Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:10:15.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Crime, Prisons, and Psychiatry: Reconsidering Problem Populations in Australia, 1890-1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Peter Becker
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Richard F. Wetzell
Affiliation:
German Historical Institute, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

In the 1890s nearly 1.5 percent of the population of New South Wales (Australia's most populous colony/state) were in prison. By the 1920s this rate had fallen dramatically to only 0.4 percent. This was not merely the effect of a severe economic recession and a subsequent period of growth. Prison admissions in Australia throughout the nineteenth century had been very high, and they declined quickly throughout the first half of the twentieth century. Like so much else in the field of crime, policing, and imprisonment, this trend was hardly unique to Australia. Similar patterns occurred in Britain, Canada, and America, a phenomenon described by Andrew Scull as the first great wave of “decarceration.” This is a misleading concept. When we examine the history of other institutions of “penality” very different patterns emerge. In New South Wales, during the same years of decline in prison admissions, mental hospital residents rose from 0.7 percent to 1.5 percent of the population. In addition, there were no government-run inebriate asylums in 1890 but by 1930 there were two such institutions and many more private institutions. Similarly, in 1890 there was only one asylum for the “mentally defective” but by 1930 there were at least six, and although the numbers admitted to juvenile reformatories had not changed, the number of neglected and delinquent children under some form of state supervision had increased dramatically through the operation of the children's court. What we can see is not so much “decarceration” as diversification, proliferation, and specification, all steps toward an unrealizable but nonetheless powerful ideal of “individualization.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Criminals and their Scientists
The History of Criminology in International Perspective
, pp. 231 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×