Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T08:56:58.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

By
Lisa Dilling  and
Susanne C. Moser
Edited by
Susanne C. Moser  and
Lisa Dilling
Lisa Dilling
Affiliation:
University of Colorado – Boulder
Susanne C. Moser
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Susanne C. Moser
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder
Lisa Dilling
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Summary

It is June 23, 1988, a sweltering day in Washington, DC, and members of the US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources are settling into their seats. What they are about to hear will change the direction of American politics forever. Up to the podium steps a six-foot middle-aged scientist, a little hoarse, a little nervous, and quietly vies for the attention of the eminent body.

The timing is perfect. Over 100 degrees outside and a deadly drought gripping much of the country, James E. Hansen, chief scientist of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, is here to nail the case for global warming. His message is simple and clear. “The greenhouse effect has been detected, and it is changing our climate now.” He states “with 99 percent confidence” that the evidence was in – the world was indeed getting warmer, and model projections pointed to worse heat waves and droughts in the future. As observers later recalled, “Besieged by the media afterward, [Hansen] said, ‘It's time to stop waffling so much and say that the greenhouse effect is here and affecting our climate now.’ Suddenly global warming – and Hansen – became world news.”

And world news it was. Not because of the news value of climate change – global warming had been buzzing around for a while – but because rarely if ever before did a scientist's warning set off such determined response. The June hearing was just the beginning. Seven hearings in the Senate and five in the House followed, each adding to the persuasiveness and urgency of the scientists' warning. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Creating a Climate for Change
Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change
 , pp. 1 - 28
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agyeman, J., Bullard, R., and Evans, B. (2003). Just Sustainabilities: Development in An Unequal World. London: Earthscan/The MIT Press.Google Scholar
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (1999). Waiting for a signal: Public attitudes toward global warming, the environment and geophysical research. Report available at: http://www.ago.org/sci_soc/attitude_study.pdf
Bell, A. (1994). Media (mis)communication on the science of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 259–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bord, R. J., O'Connor, R. E., and Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., et al. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 6, 959–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, M. (2001). American attitudes to the environment and global warming: An overview of public opinion. Report prepared for the FrameWorks Institute, Washington, DC.
Boykoff, M. T. and Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 2, 125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, R. H. (1999). “You're getting warmer …” Audobon Magazine (November/December). Available at: http://magazine.audobon.org/global.html; accessed June 15, 2005.
Brechin, S. R. (2003). Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: The US versus the world? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23, 10, 106–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, T. L. (2003). US public opinion on climate change issues: Evidence for 1989–2002. Available at: http://www.ceps.be; accessed January 5, 2006.
Briscoe, M. (2004). Communicating Uncertainty in the Science of Climate Change: An Overview of Efforts to Reduce Miscommunication Between the Research Community and Policymakers and the Public. Washington, DC: International Center for Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and Practice, 4th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Clark, W. C., et al. (2001). Acid rain, ozone depletion, and climate change: An historical overview. In Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vol. 1, Social Learning Group, ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 21–55.
Crane, V., Nicholson, H., Chen, M., et al. (1994). Informal Science Learning: What the Research Says About Television, Science Museums, and Community-Based Projects. Ephrata, PA: Science Press.Google Scholar
Dearing, J. W. (1995). Newspaper coverage of maverick science: Creating controversy through balancing. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Energy (DOE), Information Administration (2005). Monthly Energy Review, January, Table 1.3, p. 7.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillard, J. P. and Pfau, M. (eds.) (2002). The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Doppelt, B. (2003). Leading Change Toward Sustainability. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
Eastland, T. (2005). The collapse of big media: Starting over. Wilson Quarterly, (Spring).
Environics International (1998). The International Environmental Monitor, Vol. 1: Citizens Worldwide Want Tough Environmental Action Now. Available at: http://www.mori.com/polls/1998/iem_02.shtml; accessed January 10, 2006.
Field, C. B., Raupach, M. R., and Victoria, R. (2004). The global carbon cycle: Integrating humans, climate and the natural world. In The Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Humans, Climate and the Natural World, eds. Field, C. B. and Raupach, M. R. SCOPE Report #62, Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
France, M. (2004). Is there a market for nonpartisan news? Media Commentary. Business Week, November 29.Google Scholar
Futerra (2005a). UK Communications Strategy on Climate Change. London: Futerra.
Futerra (2005b). The Rules of the Game: Principles of Climate Change Communication. London: Futerra.
Hannon, B. (2005). Pathways to environmental change. Ecological Economics, 52, 417–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. E. (1988). Testimony before US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Greenhouse effect and climate change, 100th Congress, 1st Session, June 23.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Harper, D. (2001). Online Etymology Dictionary. Available at: http://www.etymonline.com/, accessed March 28, 2005.
Hayes, M. T. (2001). The Limits of Policy Change: Incrementalism, Worldview, and the Rule of Law. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hendrick, L. and Nicolaij, S. (2004). Temporal discounting and environmental risks: The role of ethical and loss-related concerns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 4, 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffert, M., et al. (2002). Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: Energy for a greenhouse planet. Science, 298, 981–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y.Griggs, D.J., et al. (eds.) (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Isham, J. and Waage, S. (forthcoming). Ignition: The Birth of the New Climate Movement Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D. (1996). Scientific uncertainty and the political process. Annals AAPSS, 545, May, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X., and Dow, K. (2001). Vulnerability, equity, and global environmental change. In Global Environmental Risk, eds. Kasperson, J. X. and Kasperson, R. E.London: Earthscan, pp. 247–72.Google Scholar
Kasperson, R. E. and Dow, K. (1991). Developmental and geographical equity in global environmental change. Evaluation Review, 15, 149–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperson, R. E. and Kasperson, J. X. (1991). Hidden hazards. In Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, eds. Mayo, D. G. and Hollander, R. D.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Kempton, W. (1991). Public understanding of global warming. Society and Natural Resources, 4, 4, 331–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosloff, L. H., et al. (2004). Outcome-oriented leadership: How state and local climate change strategies can most effectively contribute to global warming mitigation. Widener Law Journal, 14, 173–204.Google Scholar
Kull, S., et al. (2004). Americans on climate change. Menlo Park, CA: Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA), University of Maryland and Knowledge Networks.
Leaman, J. and Norton, A. (2004). The Day After Tomorrow – are the British too cool on climate change? London: MORI Social Research Unit, UK, Prime Minister's Strategy.
Leiserowitz, A. (2004). Before and after The Day After Tomorrow: A US study of climate change risk perception. Environment, 46, 9, 22–37.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A. (2003). American opinions on global warming. Project report. University of Oregon.CrossRef
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through.”Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luers, A. L. and Moser, S. C. (2006). Preparing for the Impacts of Climate Change in California: Advancing the Debate on Adaptation. CEC-500-2005-198-SD, Report prepared for the California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research Program and the California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA.
Macy, J. and Brown, M. Y. (1998). Coming Back to Life: Practices to Reconnect Our Lives, Our World. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Major, A. M. and Atwood, L. E. (2004). Environmental risks in the news: Issues, sources, problems, and values. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. J., Cauziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., et al. (eds.) (2001). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCright, A. M. and Dunlap, R. E. (2001). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 4, 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCright, A. M. and Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on US climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 55, 531–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinstry, R. B. (2003). Laboratories for local solutions for global problems: State, local and private leadership in developing strategies to mitigate the causes and effects of climate change. Penn State Environmental Law Review, 12, 15–82.Google Scholar
Mooney, C. (2004). Blinded by science: How “balanced” coverage lets the scientific fringe hijack reality (State of the Beat). Columbia Journalism Review, 6, November/December; available at: http://www.cjr.org/issues/2004/6/mooney-science.asp, accessed June 15, 2005.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G., et al. (2002). Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, S. and Dilling, L. (2004). Making climate hot: Communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment, 46, 10, 32–46.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabi, R. L. (2002). Discrete emotions and persuasion. In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, eds. Dillard, J. P. and Pfau, M.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 289–308.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) (2002). The Drama of the Commons. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC) Geophysics Study Committee (1977). Energy and Climate. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nicholsen, S. W. (2002). The Love of Nature and the End of the World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, K. L. and Leichenko, R. M. (2000). Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10, 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Keefe, D. J. (2002a). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, eds. Dillard, J. P. and Pfau, M.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 329–44.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, D. J. (2002b). Guilt and social influence. In Communication Yearbook23, ed. Roloff, M. E.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 67–101.Google Scholar
Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686.CrossRef
Pacala, S. and Socolow, R. (2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305, 968–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellechia, M. G. (1997). Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 1, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1932). The Economics of Welfare, 4th edn. New York: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. (eds.) (1998). Human Choice & Climate Change. What Have We Learned? Vol. 4. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.Google Scholar
Read, D., et al. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis, 14, 6, 971–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. New York: Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarewitz, S. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheurs, M., et al. (2001). Issue attention, framing, and actors: An analysis of patterns across arenas. In Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vol. 1, Social Learning Group, ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 349–62.Google Scholar
Schultz, P. W. (2001). Assessing the structure of environmental concern: Concern for the self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seacrest, S., Kuzelka, R., and Leonard, R. (2000). Global climate change and public perception: The challenge of translation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36, 2, 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday.
Shackley, S. and Wynne, B. (1996). Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21, 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamm, K. R., Clark, F., and Eblacas, P. R. (2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 219–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickell, C. (2002). Communicating climate change. Science, 297, 737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: Climate change versus ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungar, S. (1992). The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. The Sociological Quarterly, 33, 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists (2005). Clean Energy. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/renewable_energy/index.cfm, accessed June 9, 2005.
Voice of America (2004). US Plans to Emphasize Climate Change Adaptation at Upcoming Conference. December 3; available at: http://www.voanews.com/english/2004-12-03-voa83, accessed June 9, 2005.
Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. The American Political Science Review, 63, 3, 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weart, S. (2003). The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, L. (1993). Between facts and values: Print media coverage of the greenhouse effect, 1987–1990. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 1, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K. M. (2000). Drought, debate, and uncertainty: Measuring reporters' knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 1, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Susanne C. Moser, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Lisa Dilling, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: Creating a Climate for Change
  • Online publication: 20 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Susanne C. Moser, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Lisa Dilling, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: Creating a Climate for Change
  • Online publication: 20 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Susanne C. Moser, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Lisa Dilling, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: Creating a Climate for Change
  • Online publication: 20 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871.003
Available formats
×