Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:22:22.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Individuating Matter over Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

By
Manfred Krifka
Edited by
Hana Filip
Hana Filip
Affiliation:
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, Krifka proposes a mereotopological formal semantic theory, enriched with a temporal dimension (a spatiotemporal haptomereology) that can account for the individuation of objects and (portions of) substances over time in terms of an ontology that underlies our use of natural language in the sense of Bach’s (1981) natural language metaphysics. Krifka’s spatiotemporal haptomereology can model not only how entities in space are connected but also how entities in time are connected. This, in turn, allows for the definition of solids, liquids, gases, grains, and individuals. For example, a solid in an interval t, t’ is an entity whose interior parts touch the same parts between t and t′. With these theoretical developments, Krifka proposes an account of different types of individuation over time. For example, he proposes that material identity over time can be established via matter individuals: individuals that are understood as identifying the same matter over time. The re-identification of matter over time, it is proposed, is based on the mereotopological notion of maximally self-connected entities described by Grimm, and a haptomereological modeling of change over time.

Keywords

mereotopologyspatiotemporal haptomereology
Type
Chapter
Information
Countability in Natural Language , pp. 121 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asher, Nicholas, and Vieu, Laure (1995). Toward a geometry of common sense: A semantics and a complete axiomatization of mereotopology. Proceedings of IJCAI ’95, 846–852.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9.1: 5–16.Google Scholar
Campbell, John (1993). The role of physical objects in spatial thinking. In Eilan, Naomi, McCarthy, Rosaleen, and Brewer, Bill (eds.), Spatial Representation. Problems in Philosophy and Psychology, pp. 65–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto, and Varzi, Achille C. (1999). Parts and Places. The Structure of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Champollion, Lucas, and Krifka, Manfred (2016). Mereology. In Aloni, Maria (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, pp. 513–541. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary et al. (1998). Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 159–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, Andre (2016). Identity. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter (1973). Ontological relativity and relative identity. In Munitz, M.K. (ed.), Logic and Ontology, pp. 287–302. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott (2012a). Degrees of countability: A mereotopological approach to the mass/count distinction. SALT 22: 1–15.Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott (2012b). Number and Individuation. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anil (1980). The Logic of Common Nouns: An Investigation in Quantified Modal Logic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hovda, Paul (2013). Tensed mereology. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42: 241–283.Google Scholar
Inwagen, Peter van (2006). Can mereological sums change their parts? Journal of Philosophy 103: 614–630.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, and Reyle, Uwe (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic, and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred (1991). How to get rid of groups, using DRT: A case for discourse-oriented semantics. Texas Linguistic Forum 32: 71–110.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred (1989). Groups i. Linguistics and Philosophy 12.5: 559–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred (2011). Count nouns – mass nouns – neat nouns – mess nouns. In Glanzberg, Michael, Partee, Barbara H., and Šķilters, Jurģis (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics: Discourse, Context and Models. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6, 2010, pp. 1–67, http://thebalticyearbook.org/journals/baltic/issue/current.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C., and von Stechow, A. (eds.), Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, pp. 303–323. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Kris (2010). Parts and wholes. Philosophy Compass 5.5: 412–425.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike (1997). Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike (1998). Part structures, integrity, and the mass-count distinction. Synthese 116: 75–111.Google Scholar
Nicolas, David (2002). La distinction entre noms massifs et noms comptables. Leuven: Editions Peeters.Google Scholar
Nicolas, David (2004). Is there anything characteristic about the meaning of a count noun? Revue de la Lexicology 18–19.Google Scholar
Nicolas, David (2017). Matière et mélanges. Le français moderne 2017: 246–260.Google Scholar
Noonan, Harold, and Curtis, Ben (2017). Identity. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard v. O. (1976). Whither physical objects? In Cohen, Robert S., Feyerabend, Paul K., and Wartofsky, Marx W. (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, pp. 497–504. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard v. O. (1981). Things and their places in theories. In Theories and Things, pp. 1–23. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, Peter (1997). Region-based topology. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26: 251–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan (2011). Count nouns – mass nouns – neat nouns – mess nouns. In Glanzberg, Michael, Partee, Barbara H., and Šķilters, Jurģis (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics: Discourse, Context and Models. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6, 2010, pp. 1–67, http://thebalticyearbook.org/journals/baltic/issue/current.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2009). Spacetime the one substance. Philosophical Studies 145.1: 131–148.Google Scholar
Simons, Peter (1987). Parts. A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Sheldon R (2007). Continuous bodies, impenetrability, and contact interactions: The view from the applied mathematics of continuum mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58: 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, Mark (2016). The metaphysics of mass expressions. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Sutton, Peter R., and Filip, Hana (2016). Counting in context. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26: 350–370.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1983). Parthood and identity across time. Journal of Philosophy 80: 201–220.Google Scholar
Varzi, Achille C. (2004). Boundary. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Varzi, Achille C. (2007). Spatial reasoning and ontology: parts, wholes and locations. In Aiello, Marco, Pratt-Hartmann, Ian, and van Benthem, Johan (eds.), Handbook of Spatial Logics, pp. 945–1038. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David (1967). Identity and Spatio-Temporal Continuity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zemach, Eddy (1970). Four ontologies. Journal of Philosophy 62: 213–247.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×