Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:05:24.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2021

Edited by
Ricardo Salles
Ricardo Salles
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cosmology and Biology in Ancient Philosophy
From Thales to Avicenna
 , pp. 279 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akinpelu, J. 1967. ‘The Stoic scala naturae’. Phrontisterion 5: 7–16.Google Scholar
Algra, K. 2009. ‘Stoic Philosophical Theology and Graeco-Roman Religion’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 224–51.Google Scholar
Alesse, F. 2011–12. ‘Dio, anima e intelligibili nella Stoa’. Χώρα: Revue d’Études Anciennes et Médiévales 9–10: 365–81.Google Scholar
Alpina, T. 2018a. ‘Knowing the Soul from Knowing Oneself: A Reading of the Prologue to Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Nafs (Book of the Soul)’. Atti e Memorie dell’Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere ‘La Colombaria’ 82.68: 443–58.Google Scholar
Alpina, T. 2018b. ‘The Soul of, the Soul in Itself, and the Flying Man Experiment’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 28.2: 187–224.Google Scholar
Alpina, T. 2021. Subject, Definition, Activity: Framing Avicenna’s Science of the Soul, Scientia Graeco-Arabica series 28, De Gruyter, Berlin: Boston.Google Scholar
Alpina, T. Forthcoming. ‘Retaining, Remembering, Recollecting. Avicenna’s Account of Memory and Its Sources’ in V. Decaix, C. Thomsen Thörnqvist (eds.), Aristotle’s De memoria et reminiscentia and Its Reception, Studia Artistarum, Brepols Publishers.Google Scholar
Alt, K. 1973. ‘Zum Satz des Anaximenes über die Seele: Untersuchung von Aëtios Περὶ ἀρχῶν’. Hermes 101: 129–64.Google Scholar
Alter, T. and Nagasawa, Y. 2015. Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andral, G. 1829. Grundriss der pathologischen Anatomie: Erster Theil: Allgemeine pathologische Anatomie. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Archer-Hind, R. D. (ed.). 1888. The Timaeus of Plato. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. 1966–88. Plotinus Enneads. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Attfield, R. 1994. Environmental Philosophy: Principles and Prospects. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1976. Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1997. ‘Is the Idea of the Good in Plato’s Republic beyond Being?’ in Joyal, M. (ed.), Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition. Aldershot: Ashgate, 3–23.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1999. ‘Gegonen (Platon, Tim. 28b7): Ist die Welt real enstanden oder nicht?’ in Baltes, M. (ed.), DIANOHMATA Kleine Schriften zu Platon und zum Platonismus. Stuttgart: De Gruyter, 301–25.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. 1992. Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with selections from II. 1–3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baltzly, D. 2007. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus: Vol. III, Book 3, Part 1. Proclus on the World’s Body. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1982. The Presocratic Philosophers. Rev. ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. 2009. ‘How Industrious Can Zeus Be?’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–45.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. 2002. ‘Galen and the Mechanical Philosophy’. Apeiron 35: 235–54.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. 2003. ‘Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation’. Phronesis 47: 344–69.Google Scholar
Berti, E. 2000. ‘Metaphysics Lambda 6’ in Frede, M. and Charles, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181–206.Google Scholar
Berti, E. 2012. ‘The Finality of Aristotle’s Unmoved Mover in the Metaphysics Book 12, Chapters 7 and 10’. Nova et Vetera 10: 863–76.Google Scholar
Bertolacci, A. 2006. The Reception of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifāʾ: A Milestone of Western Metaphysical Thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2007. ‘On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology’. Phronesis 52: 3–32.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2013. ‘On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology (with New Appendices)’ in Sider, T. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin: De Gruyter, 225–61.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2018. ‘Plato and Cosmology, Theology and Cognition’ in Sisko, J. E. (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity: The History of the Philosophy of Mind, vol. 1. London: Taylor and Francis, 120–40.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bien, C. G. 1997. Erklärungen zur Entstehung von Missbildungen im physiologischen und medizinischen Schrifttum der Antike. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1999. ‘Chrysippus’ Theory of Causes’ in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 196–242.Google Scholar
Boechat, E. 2016. ‘Stoic Physics and the Aristotelianism of Posidonius’. Ancient Philosophy 36: 425–63.Google Scholar
Boechat, E. 2017. ‘The Concept of the Sun as ἡγεμονικόν in the Stoa and in Manilius’ Astronomica’. Archai 21: 79–125.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2009. ‘Two Standards of Inquiry in Aristotle’s De caelo’ in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill, 51–82.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. 2007. ‘Aristotle on Dissection of Plants and Animals and His Concept of the Instrumental Soul-Body’. Ancient Philosophy 27: 95–106.Google Scholar
Boudon, V. 2000. Galien, Exhortation à la médecine, Art médical. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2007. Galien, Sur l’ordre des ses propres livres, Sur ses propres livres, Que l’excéllent médecin est aussi philosophe. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. and Pietrobelli, A. 2005. ‘Galien résussicité: édition princeps du texte grec du De propriis placitis’. Revue des Études grecques 118: 168–213.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. 2007. ‘Physiognomy in Ancient Philosophy’ in Swain, S. et al. (eds.), Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–124.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2016. ‘Philosophy as Religion and the Meaning of “Providence” in Middle Platonism’ in Eidenow, E., Kindt, J. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 317–38.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. 2018 [= BS]. Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to 250 AD: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1983. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1995 (repr. 2017). Platon. Timée-Critias. Traduction, introduction, et notes. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1998. Le Même et l’Autre dans la Structure Ontologique du Timée de Platon. Un commentaire systématique du Timée de Platon. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2006. ‘The Intellect and the Cosmos’. Methodos 16. http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4463.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. F. 2002. ‘Non-Rational Perception in the Stoics and Augustine’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 253–308.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2009. ‘Heavenly Bodies and First Causes’ in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Oxford: Blackwell, 230–41.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2012. Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. 2015. ‘Stoic Sympathy’ in Schliesser, E. (ed.), Sympathy: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–35.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1999. ‘Stoic Metaphysics’ in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206–32.Google Scholar
Brüntrup, G. and Jaskolla, L. (eds.). 2017. Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burkhard, U. 1973. Die angebliche Heraklit-Nachfolge des Skeptikers Aenesidem. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Caluori, D. 2015. Plotinus on the Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. 2000. ‘Zoogony and Evolution in Plato’s Timaeus: The Presocratics, Lucretius and Darwin’ in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 145–80.Google Scholar
Carone, G. R. 1998. ‘Plato and the Environment’. Environmental Ethics 20: 115–33.Google Scholar
Carone, G. R. 2005. Plato’s Cosmology and Its Ethical Dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, A. 2010. ‘Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato’s Timaeus’. Phronesis 55: 281–3.Google Scholar
Caston, V. 2006. ‘Aristotle’s Psychology’ in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 316–46.Google Scholar
Caveing, M. 1965–6. ‘Quelques remarques sur le Timée et les mathématiques’. Revue de l’Enseignement Philosophique 15: 1–10.Google Scholar
Cerami, C. 2017. ‘The De Caelo et Mundo of Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifāʾ: An Overview of Its Structure, Its Goal and Its Polemical Background’. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 28: 273–329.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, C. F. and Lennox, J. G. 2020. ‘Aristotle on the Unity of the Nutritive and Reproductive Function’. Phronesis 65: 1–53.Google Scholar
Colish, M. 1990. The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2007. ‘Aristotle on Action’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 109–38.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2020. ‘Animal and Celestial Motion: The Role of an External Springboard: De Motu Animalium 2 and 3’ in Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Symposium Aristotelicum) 240–72.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2003. ‘Stoic Autonomy’ repr. in his Knowledge, Nature and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 204–44.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2009. ‘Chrysippus on Physical Elements’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. 2020. ‘The Role of Thought in Animal Voluntary Self-Locomotion’ in Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Symposium Aristotelicum) 345–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1937. Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato. London: Taylor and Francis. Reprinted in Indianapolis by Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar
Craik, E. 1978–84. Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. 3 vols. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 4,1,2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Craik, E. 1992. Galen: On Semen. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 3,1. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Craik, E. 2017. ‘Teleology in Hippocratic Texts: Clues to the Future?’ in Rocca, J. (ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 203–16.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. 2007. ‘Ex uno non fit nisi unum : storia e preistoria della dottrina avicenniana della Prima Intelligenza’ in Canone, E. (ed.), Per una storia del concetto di mente. Firenze: L. S. Olschki, 29–55.Google Scholar
Davidson, H. A. 1992. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. 1980–4. Galen, On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. 3 vols. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Diehl, E. 1903–6. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Timaeum Commentaria. 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. 1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 9th ed. 3 vols. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 2003. The Heirs of Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Distelzweig, P. 2013. ‘The Intersection of the Mathematical and Natural Sciences: The Subordinate Sciences in Aristotle’. Apeiron 46: 85–105.Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 1991. Platon. Phédon. Introduction, traduction et notes. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Google Scholar
Duminil, M. P. 1983. Le sang, les vaisseaux, le cœur dans la collection hippocratique. Anatomie et physiologie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Duminil, M. P. 1998. Hippocrate: Book VIII. Plaies, Nature des os, Cœur, Anatomie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2016. ‘The Subject Matter of Aristotle’s Physics’ in Buchheim, T., Meissner, D. and Wachsmann, N. (eds.), Sōma : Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 423–36.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M. 2015. ‘The Scientific Role of Eulogos in Cael II.12’ in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–40.Google Scholar
Fazzo, S. 2012. Il Libro Lambda della Metafisica di Aristotele. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Feke, J. 2018. Ptolemy’s Philosophy: Mathematics as a Way of Life. Princeton University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. 1966–1968. Proclus. Commentaire sur le Timée. 5 vols. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. 2013. ‘Heraclitus, the Rival of Pythagoras’ in Sider, D. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin: De Gruyter, 147–62.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. 2017. Heraclitus and Thales’ Conceptual Scheme: A Historical Study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. 1969. ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’. Journal of Philosophy 66: 829–39.Google Scholar
Frampton, M. F. 1991. ‘Aristotle’s Cardiocentric Model of Animal Locomotion’. Journal of the History of Biology 24: 291–330.Google Scholar
Frede, D. ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias’ in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2017 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/alexander-aphrodisias/.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1992. ‘Doxographie, historiographie philosophique et historiographie historique de la philosophie’. Revue de métaphysique et de morale 97: 311–25.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 2003. ‘Galen’s Theology’ in Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classicque 49 (Galien et la Philosophie). Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 73–126.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 2011. A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Sather Classical Lectures. Edited by Long, A. A. with a foreword by David Sedley. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. 2005. Aristotle and Other Platonists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1977. ‘The Theory of Affordances’ in Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward and Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 68–82.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. 1977. Manilius, Astronomica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 1991. ‘Socrates, the Craft Analogy, and Science’. Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 24: 1–24.Google Scholar
Gregory, A. 2016. Anaximander: A Re-assessment. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Goff, P., Seager, W. and Hermanson, S. A. 2017. ‘Panpsychism’ in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/panpsychism/.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. 1997 (origin. 1935). Plato, Phaedo in Cooper, J. M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (eds.), Plato: Complete Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–100.Google Scholar
Gurtler, G. 1988. Plotinus: The Experience of Unity. New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. 2006. ‘Imagination and transcendental knowledge in Avicenna’, in J. E. Montgomery (ed.), Arabic Theology, Arabic Philosophy. From the Many to the One: Essays in Celebration of Richard M. Frank,, Leuven – Paris – Dudley: Uitgeverij Peeters en Departement Oosterse Studies, 337–354.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 2011. ‘Manilius’ Conflicted Stoicism’ in Green, S. J. and Volk, K. (eds.), Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32–44.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Vol. 2. Berlin: Georg Reimer.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. 1903. Anthropogenie. 5th ed. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. 1977. The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. 1994. ‘Self-Motion in Stoic Philosophy’ in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion: From Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 175–226.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1988. ‘Galen Explains the Elephant’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14.Suppl.: 135–57.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1989. ‘Galen and the Best of All Possible Worlds’. Classical Quarterly 39: 206–27.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2017. ‘Teleology and Necessity in Greek Embryology’ in Rocca, J. (ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 242–71.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. Forthcoming. ‘A Hymn to Nature: Structure, function, design and beauty in Galen’s biology’ in D. De Brasi and F. Fronterotta (eds.), Poikile physis, Biological Literature in Greek during the Roman Empire: Genres, Scopes, and Problems. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 2006. Animate Earth: Science, Intuition and Gaia. Cambridge: Green Books.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasnaoui, A. 1984. ‘La dynamique d’Ibn Sīnā. La notion d’inclination: mayl’ in Jolivet, J. and Rashed, R. (eds.), Études sur Avicenne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 103–23.Google Scholar
Hasnaoui, A. 1990. ‘Fayḍ’ in Auroux, S. (ed.), Encyclopédie philosophique universelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2:966–72.Google Scholar
Hasnaoui, A. 2014. ‘La théorie avicennienne de l’impetus. Ibn Sīnā entre Jean Philopon et Jean Buridan’ in Arfa Mensia, M. (ed.), Views on the Philosophy of Ibn Sīnā and Mullā Ṣadrā al-Šīrāzī (Carthage, 22nd–24th Oct. 2013). Tunis: al-Mağmaʿ al-Tūnisī li-l-ʿUlūm wa-l-ādāb wa-l-Funūn, 25–42.Google Scholar
Heath, D. L. 1913. Aristarchos of Samos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2015. ‘Aristotle on the Cosmological Significance of Biological Generation’ in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–118.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2016. ‘The Failure of Evolutionary Thinking in Antiquity’ in Irby, G. L. (ed.), A Companion to Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2:313–28.Google Scholar
Helle, R. 2018. ‘Hierocles and the Stoic Theory of Blending’. Phronesis 63: 87–116.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. 1893. Galeni Scripa Minora. Vol. 3. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. 1907–9. Galenus: de Usu Partium. 2 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Hine, H. M. 2014. Seneca, Natural Questions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horn, C. 2012. ‘Aspects of Biology in Plotinus’ in Wilberding, J. and Horn, C. (eds.), Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 214–28.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. 1993. Philolaus of Croton, Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2001. The Poem of Empedocles. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. 1982. Senocrate-Ermodoro, Frammenti. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. 1991. ‘Fra Stoa e media Stoa’ in Filosofia e scienza nel pensiero ellenistico. Naples: Morano Editore, 231–63.Google Scholar
Jaskolla, L. J. and Buck, A. J. 2012. ‘Does Panexperientialism Solve the Combination Problem?’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 19: 190–99.Google Scholar
Janos, D. 2011. ‘Moving the Orbs: Astronomy, Physics, and Metaphysics, and the Problem of Celestial Motion according to Ibn Sīnā’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 21: 165–214.Google Scholar
Janos, D. Forthcoming. Ptolemy’s Theory of the Psychic Powers of the Planets in Arabic Philosophy: Some Key Sources and Problemsin A. C. Bowen, E. Gannagé, H. Umut, The Philosophy of Ptolemy and its Greek, Arabic, and Hebrew Reception, Brill.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1987. ‘Le souffle, la vie et le froid: remarques sur la famille de ψύχω d’Homère à Hippocrate’. Revue des Etudes Grecques 100: 203–24.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2009. ‘From Plato’s Timaeus to Aristotle’s De caelo’ in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill, 9–28.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2014. ‘Why the Cosmos Needs a Craftsman’. Phronesis 59: 297–320.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2008. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2019. ‘Aristotle on Kosmos and Kosmoi’ in Horky, P. (ed.), Cosmos in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 74–107.Google Scholar
Joly, R. 1960. Recherches sur le traité pseudo-hippocratique Du régime. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Joly, R. 1967. Hippocrate Du Régime. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Joly, R. and Byl, S. 2003. Hippocratis De diaeta. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum I 2,4. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Jori, A. 2005. ‘Blut und Leben bei Aristoteles’ in Gadebusch Bondio, M. (ed.), Blood in History and Blood Histories. Florence: Sismel–Edizioni del Galluzzo, 19–38.Google Scholar
Judson, L. 1994. ‘Heavenly Motion and the Unmoved Mover’ in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Movers from Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 155–71.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. 2014. ‘Empirical Eulogōs Argumentation in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals III.10’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 25–38.Google Scholar
Karfík, F. 2014. ‘L’âme du monde: Platon, Anaxagore, Empédocle’. Études platoniciennes. http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/572.Google Scholar
Kepler, J. 1596. Mysterium Cosmographicum. Frankfurt: Erasmus Kempfer.Google Scholar
Kerschensteiner, , J. 1962. Kosmos: Quellenkritische Untersuchungen zu den Vorsokratikern. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Keyt, D. 1971. ‘The Mad Craftsman of the Timaeus’. Philosophical Review 80: 230–35.Google Scholar
Kielmeyer, C. F. 1793/1993. Über die Verhältnisse der organischen Kräfte unter einander in der Reihe der verschiedenen Organisationen, die Gesetze und Folgen dieser Verhältnisse. Faksimile der Ausgabe Stuttgart 1793. Marburg an der Lahn: Basilisken-Press.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. 1999. Posidonius: The Translation of the Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohlbrugge, J. H. F. 1911. ‘Das biogenetische Grundgesetz: Eine historische Studie’. Zoologischer Anzeiger 38: 447–53.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. 1981. ‘Galen’s Religious Belief’ in Nutton, V. (ed.), Galen: Problems and Prospects. London: Wellcome Institute, 117–30.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2008. Diogène d’Apollonie: édition, traduction et commentaire des fragments et témoignages. 2nd rev. ed. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2007. ‘Les fonctions de l’intellect chez Anaxagore’ in Histoire, Doxographie, Vérité: Études sur Aristote, Théophraste et la philosophie présocratique. Louvain: Editions Peeters, 132–48.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2015. ‘Sommeils Présocratiques’ in Leroux, V., Palmieri, N. and Pigné, C. (eds.), Le Sommeil: Approches philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance. Paris: Honoré Champion, 29–50.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2020. ‘Articulating the De Motu Animalium. The Place of the Treatise Within the Corpus Aristotelicum’ in Ch. Rapp and O. Primavesi (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium, Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford University Press, pp. 272–95.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. W. (eds.). 2016. Early Greek Philosophy. 9 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2018. ‘How Preplatonic Worlds Became Ensouled’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 1–34.Google Scholar
Lanza, D. and Vegetti, M. 1971. Opere biologiche di Aristotele. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar
Lapidge, M. 1989. ‘Stoic Cosmology and the Roman Literature, First to Third Centuries A.D.’ in Haase, W. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II 36, 3. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1379–1429.Google Scholar
Le Blay, F. 2014. ‘Pneumatism in Seneca: An Example of Interaction between Physics and Medicine’ in Maire, B. (ed.), ‘Greek’ and ‘Roman’ in Latin Medical Texts. Studies in Cultural Change and Exchange in Ancient Medicine. Leiden: Brill, 63–76.Google Scholar
LeBlond, J.-M. 1938. Eulogos et l’argument de convenance chez Aristote. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Leboucq, J. B. G. 1944. ‘Une anatomie du cœur humain. Philistion de Locres et le “Timée” de Platon’. Revue des Études Grecques 57: 7–40.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1985. ‘Theophrastus on the Limits of Teleology’ in Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.), Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Works. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 143–51.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1986. ‘Aristotle, Galileo, and the Mixed Sciences’ in Wallace, W. (ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 29–51.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1994. ‘The Disappearance of Aristotle’s Biology: A Hellenistic Mystery’. Apeiron 27: 7–24.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1997. ‘Nature Does Nothing in Vain…’ in Günther, H.-C. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 199–214. Repr. in Lennox 2001b, 205–24.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001a. Aristotle on the Parts of Animals I–IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001b. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2009. ‘De caelo II.2 and Its Debt to De incessu animalium’ in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill, 187–214.Google Scholar
Lernould, A. 2000. ‘Mathématique et physique chez Proclus: l’interprétation proclienne de la notion de lien en Timée 31b-32c’ in O’Meara, D. J. and Bechtle, G. (eds.), La Philosophie des mathématiques de l’Antiquité tardive. Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires, 129–47.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2009. ‘Why Stars Have No Feet: Teleological Explanations in Aristotle’s Cosmology’ in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill, 245–71.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I. 1997. The Covenant of Reason: Rationality and the Commitments of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. 2017. Praxagoras of Cos on Arteries, Pulse and Pneuma. Fragments and Interpretation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lizzini, O. 2018. ‘Representation and Reality: On the Definition of Imaginative Prophecy in Avicenna’ in Bydén, B. and Radovic, F. (eds.), The Parva naturalia in Greek, Arabic and Latin Aristotelianism: Supplementing the Science of the Soul. New York: Springer, 133–54.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1971. Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2005. ‘Mathematics as a Model of Method in Galen’ in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity. Aldershot: Ashgate, 110–30.Google Scholar
Loenen, J. H. 1954. ‘Was Anaximander an Evolutionist?’ Mnemosyne 4: 214–32.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2002. Epictetus, a Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2003. ‘Stoicism in the Philosophical Tradition: Spinoza, Lipsius, Butler’ in Miller, J. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–29.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E. 1972. ‘Gaia as Seen through the Atmosphere’. Atmospheric Environment 6: 579–80.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E. 1976. ‘The Quest for Gaia’. New Scientist 6: 304–6.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E. 2001. Homage to Gaia: The Life of an Independent Scientist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E. and Margulis, L. 1974. ‘Atmospheric Homeostasis by and for the Biosphere: The Gaia Hypothesis’. International Meteorological Institute 26: 2–10.Google Scholar
McGinnis, J. 2006. ‘Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian’. Phronesis 51: 140–61.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. D., Jr. 1978. ‘Aristotle’s Subordinate Sciences’. British Journal for the History of Science 11.39: 197–220.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. D., 1992. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1990. ‘Doxography and Dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the “Placita”’ in Haase, W. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.4. Berlin: De Gruyter, 3056–3229.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 2014. ‘Alcmaeon and Plato on Soul’. Etudes platoniciennes 11: 1–9.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 2015. ‘Heraclitus on Soul and Super-Soul: With an Afterthought on the Afterlife’. Rhizomata 3: 62–93.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. 1997. Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer: Vol. I. The Sources. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. 2009. Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer: Vol. II: The Compendium. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. 2020. Aëtiana V. An Edition of the Reconstructed Text of the Placita. With a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts. Part 3 (Books 4 and 5), Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. 1977. Cuore, sangue, cervello: biologia e antropologia nel pensiero antico. Milan: Episteme Editrice.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. 2001. Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary. 2nd ed. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Margulis, L. 1999. Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. Houston: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2017a. Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2017b. ‘Stoic Blends’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 32: 1–24.Google Scholar
Mathews, F. 2011. ‘Panpsychism as Paradigm?’ in Blamauer, M. (ed.), The Mental as Fundamental. Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag, 141–56.Google Scholar
Maudlin, T. 2007. The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
May, M. T. 1968. Galen on the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body. 2 vols. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Meijer, P. A. 2007. Stoic Theology: Proofs for the Existence of the Cosmic God and of the Traditional Gods Including a Commentary on Cleanthes’ Hymn on Zeus. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1995. Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. 2014. La puissance de l’intelligible: La théorie plotinienne des Formes au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Michot, J. 1986. La destinée de l’homme selon Avicenne. Le retour à Dieu (maʿād) et l’imagination. Louvain: Aedibus Peeters, 110–18.Google Scholar
Morison, B. 2020. ‘Completing the Argument that Locomotion Requires an External and Unmoved Mover. De Motu Animalium 4–5’ in Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Symposium Aristotelicum), 273–98.Google Scholar
Mortley, R. 1969. ‘Plato’s Choice of the Sphere’. Revue des Études Grecques 82: 342–5.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 1891. Galeni Scripta Minora. Vol. 2. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Nagasawa, Y. and Wager, K. 2016. ‘Panpsychism and Priority Cosmopsychism’ in Brüntrup, G. and Jaskolla, L. (eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 113–29.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1979. ‘Panpsychism’ in Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 181–95.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, J. 1959. A History of Embryology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nickel, D. 2001. Galeni de Foetuum Formatione. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 3, 3. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Norman, R. 1969. ‘Aristotle’s Philosopher God’. Phronesis 14: 63–74. Repr. in J. Barnes, M. Schofield and R. Sorabji (eds.), Articles on Aristotle: Vol. 4. Psychology and Aesthetics. London: Duckworth, 93–102.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1978. Galeni de Praecognitione: Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 3,2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1987. ‘Galen’s Philosophical Testament’ in Moraux, P. (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung 2: Kommentierung, Überlieferung, Nachleben. Berlin: De Gruyter, 27–51.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1999. Galen: On My Own Opinions. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 3,2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 1996. Philodemus, On Piety. Part 1: Critical Text with Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. 2012. ‘The Middle Platonist Demiurge and Stoic Cosmobiology’ Horizons 3: 19–39.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1987. ‘Problèmes d’établissement du texte’ in Aubenque, P. (ed.), Études sur Parménide, II: Problèmes d’interprétation. Paris: Vrin, 314–50.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1997. ‘L’Empédocle de Platon’. Revue des Études Grecques 110: 381–98.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 1985. Platonic Investigations. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2017. Cosmology and Politics in Plato’s Later Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2005. ‘Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonism’ in Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Götterbilder, Gottesbilder, Weltbilder. Berlin: De Gruyter, 51–99.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1929. From the Greeks to Darwin. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Oser-Grote, C. M. 2004. Aristoteles und das Corpus Hippocraticum: Die Anatomie und Physiologie des Menschen. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Parry, R. D. 1979. ‘The Unique World of the Timaeus’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17: 1–10.Google Scholar
Parry, R. D. 1991. ‘The Intelligible World-Animal in Plato’s Timaeus’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29: 13–32.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. 1981. ‘The Unique Worlds of the Timaeus’. Phoenix 35: 105–19.Google Scholar
Peck, A. L. 1942. Aristotle: Generation of Animals. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Jean, B. 2005. Dogmatisme et scepticisme: l’Héraclitisme d’Enésidème. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du septentrion.Google Scholar
Polito, R. 2004. The Sceptical Road: Aenesidemus’ Appropriation of Heraclitus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Potter, P. 2010. Hippocrates. Vol. IX. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, P. 1990. ‘The Meaning of Δύναμις at Timaeus 31c’. Phronesis 35: 182–93.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2008. Stoici romani minori. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2014. ‘Manilius and Stoicism’ in Garani, M. and Konstan, D. (eds.), The Philosophizing Muse: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Roman Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 161–86.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. and Lucchetta, G. 2004. Allegoria, Vol. I: L’età classica, Introduction by R. Radice. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.) 2020. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Symposium Aristotelicum), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2004. ‘The Problem of the Composition of the Heavens (529–1610): A New Fragment of Philoponus and Its Readers’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 83.Suppl.: 35–56. French version: ‘Le problème de la composition du ciel (529–1610): Un nouveau fragment de Philopon et ses lecteurs’ in M. Rashed, L’héritage aristotélicien: Textes inédits de l’Antiquité. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 649–89.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2005. ‘Imagination astrale et physique supralunaire selon Avicenne’ in Federici-Vescovini, G., Sorge, V. and Vinti, C. (eds.), Corpo e anima, sensi interni e intelletto dai secoli XIII-XV ai post-cartesiani e spinoziani. Turnhout: Brepols, 103–17.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1926. Kosmos und Sympathie: Neue Untersuchungen über Poseidonios. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 1999. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2005. ‘Le sage face à Zeus. Logique, éthique et physique dans le stoïcisme impérial’. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4: 579–96.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2006. ‘The Roman Stoics on Divine Thinking and Human Knowledge’ in Gersh, S. and Moran, D. (eds.), Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 81–94.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2010. ‘Seneca’s Platonism: The Soul and Its Divine Origin’ in Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.), Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 196–215.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2013. ‘The Academy, the Stoics, and Cicero on Plato’s Timaeus’ in Long, A. G. (ed.), Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–58.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. 1992. The Meaning of Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rivaud, A. 1925. Platon. Timée. Texte et traduction. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Robin, L. 1919. Études sur la signification et la place de la physique dans la philosophie de Platon. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Robin, L. 1926. Platon. Phédon. Texte et traduction. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Robin, L. 1950. Platon. Oeuvres complètes,. Traduction nouvelle et notes (avec la collaboration de M.-J. Moreau). Books I and II Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1922. Aristotle: Metaphysics. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. 2010. Plato, The Last Days of Socrates. Eutyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo. Translation with introduction and notes. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rudberg, G. 1951. ‘Empedocles and Evolution’. Eranos 49: 23–30.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. and Share, M. 2008. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus: Vol. II, Book 2. Proclus on the Causes of the Cosmos and Its Creation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1927. The Analysis of Matter. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Salemme, C. 1983. Introduzione agli Astronomica di Manilio. Naples: Loffredo.Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2005. ‘Ekpurosis and the Goodness of God in Cleanthes’. Phronesis 50: 56–78.Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2005. The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2003. ‘Determinism and Recurrence in Early Stoic Thought’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 253–72.Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2009. ‘Chrysippus on Conflagration and the Indestructibility of the Cosmos’ in God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–34.Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2015. ‘Two Early Stoic Theories of Cosmogony’ in Marmodoro, A. and Prince, B. D. (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30.Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2018a. ‘Why Is the Cosmos Intelligent? (1) Stoic Cosmology and Plato, Philebus 29a9–30a8’. Rhizomata 6.1: 40–64.Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2018b. ‘Two Classic Problems in the Stoic Theory of Time’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 133–83.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. 1973. Physics of the Stoics. Westport: Greenwood Press. First ed. 1959 in Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. 1987. The Physical World of the Greeks. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sánchez Castro, L. C. 2016. Traditio animae: la recepción aristotélica de las teorías presocráticas del alma. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Sánchez Castro, L. C. 2021. ‘The Aristotelian Reception of Heraclitus’ Conception of the Soul’ in Harry, C. and Habash, J. (eds.), The Reception of Presocratic Natural Philosophy in Later Classical Thought. Leiden: Brill, 377–403.Google Scholar
Sattler, B. M. 2012. ‘A Likely Account of Necessity, Plato’s Receptacle as a Physical and Metaphysical Basis of Space’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50: 159–95.Google Scholar
Sattler, B. In preparation. ‘Thinking Makes the World Go Round - Intellection and Astronomy in Plato’s Timaeus’.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. 2004. Plato: The Laws. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sauvé-Meyer, S. 2009. ‘Chain of Causes: What Is Stoic Fate?’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71–92.Google Scholar
Sauvé-Meyer, S. 2014 ‘Aristotle on What Is Up to Us and What Is Contingent’ in Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M. (eds.), What Is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 75–89.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2010. ‘Monism: The Priority of the Whole’. Philosophical Review 119: 31–76.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2013. ‘The Action of the Whole’. Aristotelian Society 87.Suppl.: 67–87.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1983. ‘The Syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’. Phronesis 28: 31–58.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1999. The Stoic Idea of the City. With a foreword by Martha Nussbaum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, W. 1972. ‘Praecordia mundi. Zur Grundlegung der Bedeutung des Zodiak bei Manilius’. Hermes 100: 601–14.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1989. ‘Teleology and Myth in the Phaedo’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 5: 359–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1997a. ‘The Ideal of Godlikeness’. Repr. in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 309–28.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1997b. ‘“Becoming Like God” in the Timaeus and Aristotle’ in Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag: 327–39.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1998. ‘Platonic Causes’. Phronesis 43: 114–32.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 2002. ‘The Origins of Stoic God’ in Frede, M. and Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leiden: Brill, 41–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 2009. ‘Three Kinds of Platonic Immortality’ in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 145–61.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 2016. ‘Empedoclean Superorganisms’. Rhizomata 4: 111–25.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 2017. ‘Socrates, Darwin, and Teleology’ in Rocca, J. (ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25–42.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. and Long, A. G. 2011. Plato, Meno and Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2015. Aristotle: De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. E. 1973. Galen on Psychology, Psychopathology, and Function and Diseases of the Nervous System. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Skrbina, D. 2005. Panpsychism in the West. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1961. Cleanthes or Posidonius? The Basis of Stoic Physics. Amsterdam: N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Shani, I. 2015. ‘Cosmopsychism: A Holistic Approach to the Metaphysics of Experience’. Philosophical Papers 44: 389–417.Google Scholar
Steckerl, F. 1958. The Fragments of Praxagoras of Cos and His School. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2001. ‘The Moral Purpose of the Human Body: A Reading of Timaeus 69–72’. Phronesis 46: 105–28.Google Scholar
Strange, S. K. 1985. ‘The Double Explanation in the Timaeus’. Ancient Philosophy 5: 25–39. Repr. in G. Fine (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 397–415.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. and Freeman, A. 2006. Consciousness and Its Place in Nature: Does Physicalism Entail Panpsychism? Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 1975. Academica: Plato, Philip of Opus, and the Pseudo-Platonic Epinomis. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1928. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thein, K. 2006. ‘The Life Forms and Their Model in Plato’s Timaeus’. Rhizai 2: 241–73.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 1991. ‘Diogenes of Babylon and Stoic Embryology. Ps.-Plutarch, Plac. V 15.4 Reconsidered’. Mnemosyne 44: 106–25.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 1996. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books II–III. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2003. Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tirard, S., Morange, M. and Lazcano, A. 2010. ‘The Definition of Life: A Brief History of an Elusive Scientific Endeavor’. Astrobiology 10: 1003–9.Google Scholar
Twetten, D. 2016. ‘Aristotelian Cosmology and Causality in Classical Arabic Philosophy’ in Janos, D. (ed.), Ideas in Motion in Baghdad and Beyond: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges between Christians and Muslims in the Third/Ninth and Fourth/Tenth Centuries. Leiden: Brill, 312–434.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, T. 2013. On Gaia: A Critical Investigation of the Relationship between Life and Earth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. 1945. L’évolution de la doctrine du pneuma du Stoïcisme à S. Augustin. Paris: Desclée De Brouwer/Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Vicaire, P. 1983. Platon. Phédon. Texte et traduction. With an introduction by Robin, L.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1939. ‘The Disorderly Motion in the Timaeus’. Classical Quarterly 33: 71–83.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. 2008. Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. 2012. ‘Michael Frede, a Free Will’. Classical Philology 107: 161–8.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. 2014. ‘I Shall Do What I Did: Stoic Views on Action’ in Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M. (eds.), What Is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 107–20.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. 2018. ‘A Unified Notion of Cause’. Rhizomata: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 6: 65–86.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2009. Manilius and His Intellectual Background. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vorwerk, M. 2010. ‘Maker or Father? The Demiurge from Plutarch to Plotinus’ in Mohr, R. D. and Sattler, B. M. (eds.), One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today. Las Vegas: Parmenides, 79–100.Google Scholar
Vottero, D. 1989. Questioni naturali di Lucio Anneo Seneca. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar
Westra, L. and Robinson, T. (eds.), The Greeks and the Environment. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2006. Plotinus’ Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2011. ‘Intelligible Kinds and Natural Kinds in Plotinus’. Études Platoniciennes 7: 53–73.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2014. ‘Teratology in Neoplatonism’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 1021–42.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2015. ‘Plato’s Embryology’. Early Science and Medicine 20: 150–68.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2017. Forms, Souls and Embryos: Neoplatonists on Human Reproduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wildberger, J. 2006. Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt. 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2013. Structure and Method in Aristotle’s Meteorologica: A More Disorderly Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, R. 2002. ‘Final and Efficient Causality in Avicenna’s Cosmology and Theology’. Quaestio 2: 97–123.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, R. 2003a. Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, R. 2003b. ‘Towards a History of Avicenna’s Distinction between Immanent and Transcendent Causes’ in Reisman, D. and Al-Rahim, A. H. (eds.), Before and after Avicenna: Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group. Leiden: Brill, 49–68.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1922. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Zeyl, D. J. 2000. Plato: Timaeus. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Ricardo Salles, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Book: Cosmology and Biology in Ancient Philosophy
  • Online publication: 21 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108873970.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Ricardo Salles, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Book: Cosmology and Biology in Ancient Philosophy
  • Online publication: 21 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108873970.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Ricardo Salles, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Book: Cosmology and Biology in Ancient Philosophy
  • Online publication: 21 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108873970.017
Available formats
×