Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Supernovae: Observations Today
- Part III Theory of Thermonuclear Supernovae
- Part IV Theory of Core Collapse Supernovae
- 22 Rotation in core collapse progenitors: single and binary stars
- 23 Large scale convection and the convective supernova mechanism
- 24 Topics in core-collapse supernova-theory
- 25 MHD supernova jets: the missing link
- 26 Effects of super-strong magnetic fields in a core collapse supenova
- 27 Non-radial instability of stalled accretion shocks: advective-acoustic cycle
- 28 Asymmetry effects in hypernovae
- 29 Stellar abundances: the r-process and supernovae
- Part V Magnetars, N-Stars, Pulsars
- Part VI Gamma-ray Bursts
- Part VII Conference Summary
- References
22 - Rotation in core collapse progenitors: single and binary stars
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Supernovae: Observations Today
- Part III Theory of Thermonuclear Supernovae
- Part IV Theory of Core Collapse Supernovae
- 22 Rotation in core collapse progenitors: single and binary stars
- 23 Large scale convection and the convective supernova mechanism
- 24 Topics in core-collapse supernova-theory
- 25 MHD supernova jets: the missing link
- 26 Effects of super-strong magnetic fields in a core collapse supenova
- 27 Non-radial instability of stalled accretion shocks: advective-acoustic cycle
- 28 Asymmetry effects in hypernovae
- 29 Stellar abundances: the r-process and supernovae
- Part V Magnetars, N-Stars, Pulsars
- Part VI Gamma-ray Bursts
- Part VII Conference Summary
- References
Summary
Abstract
Current massive single star evolution models with rotation, especially when magnetic fields are included, appear to get close in reproducing the spin rates of young neutron stars. This, however, excludes them as progenitors of gamma-ray bursts within the collapsar model. Close binary evolution models with rotation, on the other hand, suggest that the mass receiving star is spun-up appreciably and may retain enough angular momentum in its core until collapse, while the mass donor is spun-down to produce core rotation rates below those of single stars.
Introduction
The evolution of a single star can be strongly influenced by its rotation (e.g., Heger & Langer 2000; Meynet & Maeder 2000), and evolutionary models of rotating stars are now available for many masses and metallicities. While the treatment of the rotational processes in these models is not yet in a final stage (e.g., magnetic dynamo processes are just about to be included; Heger et al. 2003), they provide first ideas of what rotation can really do to a star.
Effects of rotation, as important as they are in single stars, can be much stronger in the components of close binary systems: Estimates of the angular momentum gain of the accreting star in mass transferring binaries show that critical rotation may be reached quickly (Packet 1981; Langer et al. 2000). Therefore, we need binary evolution models which include a detailed treatment of rotation in the stellar interior, as in recent single star models.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cosmic Explosions in Three DimensionsAsymmetries in Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts, pp. 191 - 198Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
References
- 1
- Cited by