Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:06:37.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2023

Theresa Neumaier
Theresa Neumaier
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dortmund
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Conversation in World Englishes
Turn-Taking and Cultural Variation in Southeast Asian and Caribbean English
 , pp. 272 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aijmer, K., 2011. Well I’m not sure I think … The use of ‘well’ by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), pp. 231–254.Google Scholar
Andersen, G., 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L., 2020. AntConc (Version 3.5.9 Macintosh OS X). Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar
Auer, P., 2007. Syntax als Prozess. In: Hausendorf, H., ed. Gespräch als Prozess. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 95–124.Google Scholar
Auer, P., 2015. The temporality of language in interaction: Projection and latency. In: Deppermann, A. & Günthner, S., eds. Temporality in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
Barron, A. & Schneider, K. P., 2009. Variational pragmatics: Studying the impact of social factors on language use in interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(4), pp. 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S., 2015. Tension in co-opetition. In: Spotts, H. E., ed. Creating and Delivering Value in Marketing: Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Washington, DC: Springer, pp. 38–42.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., et al., 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bilmes, J., 1997. Being interrupted. Language in Society, 26(4), pp. 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolden, G., 2006. Little words that matter: Discourse markers ‘so’ and ‘oh’ and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), pp. 661–688.Google Scholar
Bolden, G., 2009. Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), pp. 974–998.Google Scholar
Bolton, K. & Graddol, D., 2012. English in China today. English Today, 28(1), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D, Bloom, J. E., et al., 2001. Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), pp. 123–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandenburger, A. M. & Nalebuff, B. J., 1995. The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
Brato, T., 2019. Lexical expansion in Ghanaian English from a diachronic perspective: A structural and semantic analysis. In: Esimaje, A., Gut, U., & Antia, B. E., eds. Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 259–291.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, S., 2020. Children’s English in Singapore: Acquisition, Properties, and Us. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, S. & Kautzsch, A., 2017. Towards an integrative approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes, 36(1), pp. 104–126.Google Scholar
Chen, M.-J., 2008. Reconceptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), pp. 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinese Culture Connection, 1987. Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), pp. 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, B. & McCarthy, M., 2015. Co-constructed turn-taking. In: Aijmer, K. & Rühlemann, C., eds. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 430–453.Google Scholar
Clancy, P., Thompson, S. A., Suzuki, R., et al., 1996. The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(3), pp. 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Fox Tree, J. E., 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, pp. 73–111.Google Scholar
Clayman, S. E., 2010. Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk. Discourse & Communication, 4(2), pp. 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. E., 2013. Turn-constructional units and the transition relevance place. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T., eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 150–166.Google Scholar
Clift, R., Drew, P., & Hutchby, I., 2009. Conversation analysis. In: D’hondt, S., Östman, J., & Verschueren, J., eds. The Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 40–54.Google Scholar
Clyne, M., 1994. Intercultural Communication at Work: Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, J., 1996. Women Talk: Conversations between Women Friends. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J., & Donaldson, D. I., 2007. It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105(3), pp. 658–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corley, M. & Stewart, O. W., 2008. Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), pp. 589–602.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ono, T., 2007. ‘Incrementing’ in conversation: A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics, 17(4), pp. 513–552.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., 1996. Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., eds. Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D., 1979. Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In: Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. N., & Svartvik, J., eds. Studies in English Linguistics: For Randolph Quirk. London: Longman, pp. 153–166.Google Scholar
Crystal, D., 2008. Two thousand million? Updates on the statistics of English. English Today, 24(1), pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
Deuber, D., 2014. English in the Caribbean: Variation, Style and Standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blythe, J., & Dirksmeyer, T., 2014. Formats for the other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in language typology. Studies in Language, 38(1), pp. 5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’souza, J., 1988. Interactional strategies in South Asian languages: Their implications for teaching English internationally. World Englishes, 7(2), pp. 159–171.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M., Duncan, N. D. C., & Nettle, D., 1995. Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups. Human Nature, 6(1), pp. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, S., 1972. Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), pp. 283–292.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. & Fiske, D. W., 1977. Face to Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eades, D., 2007. Understanding Aboriginal silence in legal contexts. In: Kotthoff, H. & Spencer-Oatey, H., eds. Handbook of Intercultural Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–301.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C., 1981. Who’s got the floor?. Language in Society, 10(3), pp. 383–421.Google Scholar
Egbert, M., 1996. Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator ‘bitte?’. Language in Society, 25(4), pp. 587–612.Google Scholar
Eglin, P., 2015. Language, culture, and interaction. In: Sharifian, F., ed. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 141–153.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. & Sidnell, J., 2014. Language presupposes an enchronic infrastructure for social interaction. In: Dor, D., Knight, C., & Lewis, J., eds. The Social Origins of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92–104.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T., Brown, P., et al., 2019. Polar answers. Journal of Linguistics, 55(2), pp. 277–304.Google Scholar
Fang, T., 2011. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), pp. 25–50.Google Scholar
Ferrara, K., 1992. The interactive achievement of a sentence: Joint productions in therapeutic discourse. Discourse Processes, 15(2), pp. 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, E., 2005. Rude sounds: Kiss Teeth and negotiation of the public sphere. In: Mühleisen, S. & Migge, B., eds. Politeness and Face in Caribbean Creoles. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 73–99.Google Scholar
Fischer, K., 2000. Discourse particles, turn-taking, and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 8, pp. 111–137.Google Scholar
FitzGerald, H. G., 2003. How Different Are We? Spoken Discourse in Intercultural Communication: The Significance of the Situational Context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. & Loakes, D., 2006. Patterns of rising and falling in Australian English. In: Warren, P. & Watson, C. I., eds. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. s.l.:University of Auckland, pp. 42–47.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E., 2001. Denial and the construction of conversational turns. In: Bybee, J. & Noonan, M., eds. Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A., 1996. Practices in the construction of turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited. Pragmatics, 6(3), pp. 427–454.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A., 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In: Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14–38.Google Scholar
Fox, B. A., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R., 1996. A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–237.Google Scholar
Fox, B., Wouk, F., Hayashi, M., et al., 2009. A cross-linguistic investigation of the site of initiation in same-turn self-repair. In: Sidnell, J., ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–103.Google Scholar
French, P. & Local, J., 1983. Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Görlach, M., 2002. Still More Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gardner, R., 2001. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. & Mushin, I., 2007. Post-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in a Garrwa Community. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), pp. 35.1–35.14.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., 2008. Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference? In: Romero-Trillo, J., ed. Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P. J., 1989. Inviting shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(2), pp. 127–149.Google Scholar
Glenn, P. J., 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
GLOBE, 2020, n.d. Global Leadership & Organizational Behavior Effectiveness: 2004 Data. https://globeproject.com/results (accessed 28.09.2021).Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F., 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., 1986. Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9, pp. 205–217.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), pp. 1489–1522.Google Scholar
Graham, L. R., 1995. Performing Dreams: Discourses of Immortality among the Xavante of Central Brazil. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. F., 1992. The pragmatic particles of Singapore Colloquial English. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Gut, U., 2011. Studying structural innovations in New English varieties. In: Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M., eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner English: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar
Guy, G., Horvath, B., Vonwiller, J., et al., 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society, 15(1), pp. 23–51.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T., 1976. Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Haselow, A., 2021. Dealing with trouble in conversation in English-speaking cultures: Conversational repair in global varieties of English. English World-Wide, 42(3), pp. 324–349.Google Scholar
Haviland, W. A., 1990. Cultural Anthropology. Orlando, FL: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M., 2004. Projection and grammar: Notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative ‘are’ in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp. 1337–1374.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M., 2005. Joint construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica, 156, pp. 21–53.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M., 2013. Turn allocation and turn sharing. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T., eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 167–190.Google Scholar
Heath, C. & Luff, P., 1993. Explicating face-to-face interaction. In: Gilbert, N., ed. Researching Social Life. London: Sage, pp. 306–326.Google Scholar
Heldner, M. & Edlund, J., 2010. Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversation. Journal of Phonetics, 38, pp. 555–568.Google Scholar
Hepburn, A. & Bolden, G. B., 2017. Transcribing for Social Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., 1987. Enthnomethodology. In: Giddens, A. & Turner, J. H., eds. Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 224–272.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., 1995. Conversation Analysis: Methodological aspects. In: Quasthoff, U. M., ed. Aspects of Oral Communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 391–418.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., 2015. ‘Well’-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, pp. 88–104.Google Scholar
Hoey, E. M., 2018. How speakers continue with talk after a lapse in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), pp. 329–346.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., 2021. The 6-D Model of National Culture. https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/ (accessed 28.09.2021).Google Scholar
Holt, E. & Drew, P., 2005. Figurative pivots: The use of figurative expressions in pivotal topic transitions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(1), pp. 35–61.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., 2004. The openness of grammatical constructions. Papers from the 40th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 40(2), pp. 143–175.Google Scholar
Hopper, R., 1989. Conversation Analysis and Social Psychology as descriptions of interpersonal communication. In: Roger, D. & Bull, P., eds. Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 48–65.Google Scholar
Horlacher, A.-S. & Pekarek Doehler, S., 2014. ‘Pivotage’ in French talk-in-interaction: On the emergent natrue of [clause-NP-clause] pivots. Pragmatics, 24(3), pp. 593–622.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Davidan, M., et al. eds., 2004. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Howard, G. & Ogay, T., 2007. Communication Accommodation Theory. In: Whaley, B. B. & Samter, W., eds. Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 293–310.Google Scholar
Huang, L.-F., 2019. A corpus-based exploration of the discourse marker ‘well’ in spoken interlanguage. Language and Speech, 62(3), pp. 570–593.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I., 2008. Participants’ orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(2), pp. 221–241.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. & Baker, W. E., 2000. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), pp. 19–51.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., et al., 2014. World Values Survey: Round Six – Country-Pooled Datafile Version. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp (accessed 09.2021).Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S., 2009. Initiating interactive turn spaces in Japanese conversation: Local projection and collaborative action. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), pp. 226–246.Google Scholar
James, D. & Clarke, S., 1993. Women, men, and interruptions: A critical review. In: Tannen, D., ed. Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–280.Google Scholar
James, W. & Youssef, V., 2004. The creoles of Trinidad and Tobago: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, B., Burridge, K., Mesthrie, R., et al., eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 454–481.Google Scholar
Jasperson, R., 2002. Some linguistic aspects of closure cut-offs. In: Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–286.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 1974. Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 3(2), pp. 181–199.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In: Psathas, G., ed. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 1983a. Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘mm hm’. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Two Papers on Transitory Recipientship. Tilburg: Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 1983b. On a failed hypothesis: ‘Conjunctionals’ as overlap-vulnerable. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Two Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation. Tilburg: Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 1984. Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In: D’Urso, V. & Leonardi, P., eds. Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetorics. Padua: cleup editore, pp. 11–38.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 1985. An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In: van Dijk, T. A., ed. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 1986a. Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9(2–3), pp. 153–183.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 1986b. On stepwise transition from talk about trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matches. In: Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., eds. Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–222.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 2002. Is ‘no’ an acknowledgement token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(-) tokens. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10–11), pp. 1345–1383.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., 2004. A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation. In: Lerner, G. H., ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B., 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In: Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. G., eds. English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & The British Council, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y. & Smith, L. E., 2008. Cultures, Contexts, and World Englishes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keevallik, L., 2013. Accomplishing continuity across sequences and encounters: ‘No(h)’-prefaced initiations in Estonian. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, pp. 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., 2015. The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(250), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H. & Torreira, F., 2015. The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), pp. 255–289.Google Scholar
Kirk, J. & Nelson, G., 2018. The International Corpus of English project: A progress report. World Englishes, 37(4), pp. 697–716.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A., 2010. English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN: A Multilingual Model. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A., Lixun, W., Patkin, J., et al. 2020. ACE. https://corpus.eduhk.hk/ace/index.html (accessed 08.2021).Google Scholar
Kita, S. & Ide, S., 2007. Nodding, ‘aizuchi’, and final particles in Japanese conversation: How conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), pp. 1242–1254.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G., 2003. Hesitation: In defence of ER and ERM. English Studies, 84(2), pp. 170–198.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G., 2009. Where do we backchannel? On the use of mm, mhm, uh huh and such like. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), pp. 81–112.Google Scholar
Klumm, M., 2021. Nominal and Pronominal Address in Jamaica and Trinidad. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kortmann, B. & Lunkenheimer, K., 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. http://ewave-atlas.org (accessed 08.03.2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtić, E., Brown, G. J., & Wells, B., 2013. Resources for turn competition in overlapping talk. Speech Communication, 55, pp. 721–743.Google Scholar
Kwan-Terry, A., 1991. Child Language Development in Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., 1970. The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, pp. 30–87.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., 1982. A Course in Phonetics. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, J. & Sajavaara, K., 1985. The silent Finn. In: Tannen, D. & Saville-Troike, M., eds. Perspectives on Silence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 193–201.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, J. R. E., 2013. Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H., 1996. On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation. Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–276.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H., 2003. Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2), pp. 177–201.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H., 2004a. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), pp. 151–184.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H., 2004b. Collaborative turn sequences. In: Lerner, G. H., ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 225–256.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. & Takagi, T., 1999. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp. 49–75.Google Scholar
Leuckert, S., 2019. Topicalization in Asian Englishes: Forms, Functions, and Frequencies of a Fronting Construction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leuckert, S. & Neumaier, T., 2016. Copula deletion in English as a Lingua Franca in Asia. 10plus1: Living Linguistics, 2, pp. 86–106.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., 2013. Action formation and action ascription. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T., eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 103–130.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. & Torreira, F., 2015. Timing in turn-taking and its implication for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Levitin, T., 1973. Values. In: Robinson, J. P. & Shaver, P. R., eds. Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, ISR, pp. 489–502.Google Scholar
Lim, L., 2007. Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes, 26(4), pp. 446–473.Google Scholar
Li, P. P., 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), pp. 413–439.Google Scholar
Li, X., 2014. Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Local, J., 1996. Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., eds. Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–230.Google Scholar
Local, J. & Kelly, J., 1986. Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9(2–3), pp. 185–204.Google Scholar
Local, J., Kelly, J., & Wells, W. H. G., 1986. Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp. 411–437.Google Scholar
Local, J. & Walker, G., 2004. Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp. 1375–1403.Google Scholar
Local, J. & Walker, G., 2012. How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Volume 42(3), pp. 255–280.Google Scholar
Local, J., Wells, W. H. G., & Sebba, M., 1985. Phonology for conversation: Phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, pp. 309–330.Google Scholar
Maclay, H. & Osgood, C. E., 1959. Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15(1), pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
Markee, N., 2008. Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), pp. 404–427.Google Scholar
Maynard, D., 2013. Everyone and no one to turn to: Intellectual roots and contexts for Conversation Analysis. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T., eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 11–31.Google Scholar
Meierkord, C., 2020. The global growth of English at the grassroots. In: Schreier, D., Hundt, M., & Schneider, E. W., eds. The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–338.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R., 1992. English in Language Shift: The History, Structure, and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R., 2004. Synopsis: The phonology of English in Africa and South and Southeast Asia. In: Schneider, E. W., Burridge, B., Kortmann, B., et al. eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 1: Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1099–1109.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L., 2007. Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meyer, C., 2018. Culture, Practice, and the Body: Conversational Organization and Embodied Culture in Northwestern Senegal. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Minkov, M., 2013. Cross-Cultural Analysis: The Science and Art of Comparing the World’s Modern Societies and Their Cultures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Moerman, M., 1977. The preference for self-correction in a Thai conversational corpus. Language, 53(4), pp. 872–882.Google Scholar
Moerman, M., 1988. Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, L., 2019. Contemporary issues in Conversation Analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
Mulder, J., Thompson, S. A., & Williams, C. P., 2009. Final ‘but’ in Australian English conversation. In: Peters, P., Collins, P., & Smith, A., eds. Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 337–358.Google Scholar
Murray, S. O., 1985. Toward a model of members’ methods for recognizing interruptions. Language in Society, 14, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
Nelson, G., 2002. Markup Manual for Spoken Texts - International Corpus of English. http://ice-corpora.net/ice/index.html (accessed 22.09.2021).Google Scholar
Neumaier, T., 2023. New Englishes and Conversation Analysis: Turn-taking as a factor in explaining syntactic variation. In: Wilson, G. & Westphal, M., eds. New Englishes, New Methods: Methodological Considerations for the Study of New Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 65–83.Google Scholar
Nevile, M., 2015. The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), pp. 121–151.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., 1984. Clarification and culture. In: Schiffrin, D., ed. Georgetown University Round Table in Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 325–341.Google Scholar
O’Connell, D. C., Kowal, S., & Ageneau, C., 2005. Interjections in interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 34(2), pp. 153–171.Google Scholar
Ogden, R., 2004. Non-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnish. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ford, C. E., eds. Sound Patterns in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 29–62.Google Scholar
Ogden, R., 2013. Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), pp. 299–320.Google Scholar
Ogden, R., 2018. The actions of peripheral linguistic objects: clicks. In: Ginzburg, J. & Pelachaud, C., eds. Proceedings of Laughter Workshop 2018. s.l.:Sorbonne Université, pp. 2–5.Google Scholar
Ogden, R., 2020. Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), pp. 66–89.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. & Routarinne, S., 2005. The communicative functions of final rises in Finnish intonation. Phonetica, 62(2–4), pp. 169–175.Google Scholar
Oreström, B., 1983. Turn-taking in English Conversation. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Padula, G. & Dagnino, G. B., 2007. Untangling the rise of coopetition: The intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(2), pp. 32–52.Google Scholar
Patrick, P. L., 2008. Jamaican Creole: Morphology and syntax. In: Schneider, E. W., ed. Varieties of English: The Americas and the Caribbean. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 609–644.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., 2011. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation. In: Auer, P. & Pfänder, S., eds. Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 45–87.Google Scholar
Peters, P. & Wong, D., 2015. Turn management and backchannels. In: Aijmer, K. & Rühlemann, C., eds. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 408–429.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U., 1976. Some sources of cultural variability in the regulation of talk. Language in Society, 5(1), pp. 81–95.Google Scholar
Platt, J., Weber, H., & Ho, M. L., 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Raymond, G., 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), pp. 939–967.Google Scholar
Raymond, G., 2004. Prompting action: The stand-alone ‘so’ in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), pp. 185–218.Google Scholar
Reber, E., 2012. Affectivity in Interaction: Sound Objects in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Reisman, K., 1974. Contrapuntual conversations in an Antiguan village. In: Baumann, R. & Sherzer, J., eds. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–123.Google Scholar
Rieger, C. L., 2003. Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1), pp. 47–69.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. G. & Levinson, S. C., 2017. Conversation, cognition and cultural evolution: A model of the cultural evolution of word order through pressures imposed from turn taking in conversation. Interaction Studies, 18(3), pp. 404–431.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, I., Jantos, S., Höhn, N., et al., 2009. International Corpus of English: Manual for the Jamaican Component (ICE-JA). www.researchgate.net/publication/268285735_Manual_for_the_Jamaican_component_ICE-JA (accessed 09.08.2021).Google Scholar
RStudio, 2021. R Studio Desktop Open Source Edition. www.rstudio.com/products/rstudio (accessed 09.11.2021).Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C., Bagoutdinov, A., & Brook O’Donnell, M., 2011. Windows on the mind: Pauses in conversational narrative. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), pp. 198–230.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., 1974. An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In: Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J., eds. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337–353.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., 1984. Notes on methodology. In: Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–27.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., 1992 [1967]. Lecture 1: The speaker sequencing problem. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 624–632.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., 1992 [1968]. Lecture 3: Turn-taking; the notion ‘conversation’, noticeable absences, greetings, adjacency. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 32–43.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., 1992 [1969]. Lecture 9: Sound shifts; showing understanding; dealing with ‘utterance completion’; practical mysticism. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 137–149.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., 1992 [1971]. Lecture 4: Spouse talk. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 437–443.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G., 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), pp. 696–735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In: Tannen, D., ed. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71–93.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 1987 [1973]. Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation. In: Button, G. & Lee, J. R. E, eds. Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 70–85.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 1993. Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), pp. 99–128.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 1995. Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction. In: ten Have, P. & Psathas, G., eds. Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–133.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 1998. Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society, 9(3), pp. 457–460.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 2000. Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 2006. Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In: Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C., eds. Roots of Human Society: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg, pp. 70–96.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., 2013. Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In: Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J., eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–70.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H., 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), pp. 361–382.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. & Lerner, G. H., 2009. Beginning to respond: ‘Well’-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, pp. 91–115.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H., 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), pp. 289–327.Google Scholar
Scheutz, H., 2005. Pivot constructions in spoken German. In: Hakulinen, A. & Selting, M., eds. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 103–128.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D., 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D., 2014. ‘Oh’ as a marker of information management. In: Jaworski, A. & Coupland, N., eds. The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 254–275.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W., 2004a. Synopsis: Morphological and syntactic variation in the Americas and the Caribbean. In: Kortmann, B. Burridge, B., Mesthrie, R., et al. eds. An Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1104–1115.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W., 2004b. Global synopsis: Phonetic and phonological variation in English world-wide. In: Schneider, E. W., Burridge, B., Mesthrie, R., et al. eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1111–1137.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W., 2014. Asian Englishes – into the future. A bird’s eye view. Asian Englishes, 16(3), pp. 249–256.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W., 2017. Models of English in the world. In: Filppula, M., Klemola, J., & Sharma, D., eds. The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–57.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W., 2018. The interface between cultures and corpora: Tracing reflections and manifestations. ICAME Journal, 42(1), pp. 97–132.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W., 2020. English around the World: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, G., 2017. International Corpus of English (ICE). www.ice-corpora.uzh.ch/en/design.html (accessed 08.2021).Google Scholar
Schröder, A. & Schneider, K. P., 2018. Variational pragmatics, responses to thanks, and the specificity of English in Namibia. English World-Wide, 39(9), pp. 338–368.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., 1994. Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In: Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., et al. eds. Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 85–119.Google Scholar
Selting, M., 1995. Prosodie im Gespräch: Aspekte einer Interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Selting, M., 1996. On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6, pp. 357–388.Google Scholar
Selting, M., 2000. The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 29, pp. 477–517.Google Scholar
Selting, M., 2001. Fragments of units as deviant cases of unit-production in conversational talk. In: Selting, M. & Couper-Kuhlen, E., eds. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 229–258.Google Scholar
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., et al., 2009. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung, 10, pp. 353–402.Google Scholar
Shields-Brodber, K., 1992. Dynamism and assertiveness in the public voice: Turn-taking and code-switching in radio talk shows in Jamaica. Pragmatics, 2(4), pp. 487–504.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2001. Conversational turn-taking in a Caribbean English Creole. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(8), pp. 1263–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2006. Conversational analytic approaches to culture. In: Brown, K., ed. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. s.l.:Elsevier Science, pp. 169–172.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2007a. ‘Look’-prefaced turns in first and second position: Launching, interceding and redirecting action. Discourse Studies, 9(3), pp. 387–408.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2007b. Comparative studies in conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, pp. 229–244.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2008. Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organisation of repair in two Caribbean communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), pp. 477–503.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2009a. Comparative perspectives in conversation analysis. In: Sidnell, J., ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2009b. Language-specific resources in repair and assessments. In: Sidnell, J., ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 304–325.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., 2016. Conversation Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.40 (accessed 01.10.2018).Google Scholar
Statista Research Department, 2021. The Most Spoken Languages Worldwide 2021. www.statista.com/statistics/266808/the-most-spoken-languages-worldwide/ (accessed 08.03.2021).Google Scholar
Stenström, A.-B., 1990. Pauses in monologue and dialogue. In: Svartvik, J., ed. The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: Lund University Press, pp. 211–252.Google Scholar
Stenström, A.-B., 1994. An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Stenström, A.-B., 2005. ‘It’s very good eh’ – ‘Está muy bien eh’: Teenagers’ use of tags: London and Madrid compared. In: McCafferty, K., Bull, T., & Killie, K., eds. Contexts: Historical, Social, Linguistic: Studies in Celebration of Toril Swan. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 279–292.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., 2015. Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in Conversation Analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(1), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., 2021. Is Conversation Built for Two? The Partitioning of Social Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(1), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., et al., 2009. Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), pp. 10587–10592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, H., 1999. Turn-taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., 2004. Prosody for marking transition-relevance places in Japanese conversation: The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objects. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ford, C. E., eds. Sound Patterns in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 63–96.Google Scholar
Tannen, D., 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tannen, D., 1994. Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ten Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., & Boves, L., 2005. On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Communication, 47(1), pp. 80–86.Google Scholar
Tottie, G., 1991. Conversational style in British and American English: The case of backchannels. In: Aijmer, K. & Altenberg, B., eds. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. New York: Routledge, pp. 254–335.Google Scholar
Tottie, G., 2011. Uh and um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), pp. 173–197.Google Scholar
Tottie, G., 2014. Uh and um in British and American English: Are they words? Evidence from co-occurence with pauses. In: Dion, N., Lapierre, A., & Torres Cacoullous, R., eds. Linguistic Variation: Confronting Fact and Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 38–54.Google Scholar
Tottie, G., 2015. Turn management and the fillers uh and uhm. In: Aijmer, K. & Rühlemann, C., eds. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–407.Google Scholar
Tottie, G. & Hoffmann, S., 2009. Tag questions in English: The first century. Journal of English Linguistics, 37(2), pp. 130–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G., 2007. On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), pp. 2217–2243.Google Scholar
Walker, G., 2010. The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction. In: Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E., & Selting, M., eds. Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
Walker, G., 2017. Pitch and the projection of more talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), pp. 206–225.Google Scholar
Walker, M. B. & Trimboli, C., 1982. Smooth transitions in conversational interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(2), pp. 305–306.Google Scholar
Warren, P., 2016. Uptalk: The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, D. R., 1992. The understanding of language use in everyday life. In: Watson, G. & Seiler, R. M., eds. Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Wells, B. & Macfarlane, S., 1998. Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech, 41(3–4), pp. 265–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, B. & Peppé, S., 1996. Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn-taking in English dialects. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., eds. Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–130.Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, A. & Siegel, A. F., 2003. Keeping the floor in multiparty conversation: Intonation, syntax, and pause. Discourse Processes, 36(2), pp. 77–107.Google Scholar
Wilson, G., Westphal, M., Hartmann, J., et al. 2017. The use of question tags in different text types of Trinidadian English. World Englishes, 36(4), pp. 726–743.Google Scholar
Winford, D., 1993. Predication in Caribbean English Creoles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wright, M., 2005. Studies of the Phonetics-Interaction Interface: Clicks and Interactional Structures in English Conversation. PhD dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Wright, M., 2011. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), pp. 207–229.Google Scholar
Wu, R.-J. R., 2009. Repetition in the initiation of repair. In: Sidnell, J., ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–59.Google Scholar
Xu, J., 2016. Displaying Recipiency: Reactive Tokens in Mandarin Task-oriented Interactional Styles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Youssef, V. & James, W., 2008. The creoles of Trinidad and Tobago: Phonology. In: Schneider, E. W., ed. Varieties of English: The Americas and the Caribbean. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 320–338.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., 2012. Latching/rush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions in retrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation: Findings from Mandarin Chinese. Discourse Processes, 49(3–4), pp. 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Theresa Neumaier, Technische Universität Dortmund
  • Book: Conversation in World Englishes
  • Online publication: 30 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108936996.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Theresa Neumaier, Technische Universität Dortmund
  • Book: Conversation in World Englishes
  • Online publication: 30 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108936996.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Theresa Neumaier, Technische Universität Dortmund
  • Book: Conversation in World Englishes
  • Online publication: 30 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108936996.009
Available formats
×