Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Author Notes
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Sociology, Society and the Environment
- PART I SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES
- 1 Old Traditions and New Ages: Religions and Environments
- 2 Social Nature
- 3 Gender, Eco-Feminism and the Environment
- 4 Animals, ‘Nature’ and Human Interests
- 5 Governing Environmental Harms in a Risk Society
- PART II SOCIAL TRENDS
- PART III SOCIAL ISSUES
- Index
- References
1 - Old Traditions and New Ages: Religions and Environments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Author Notes
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Sociology, Society and the Environment
- PART I SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES
- 1 Old Traditions and New Ages: Religions and Environments
- 2 Social Nature
- 3 Gender, Eco-Feminism and the Environment
- 4 Animals, ‘Nature’ and Human Interests
- 5 Governing Environmental Harms in a Risk Society
- PART II SOCIAL TRENDS
- PART III SOCIAL ISSUES
- Index
- References
Summary
Surely religion has little to say of significance about the environment? That is a central argument of this chapter. However, it is only half the story, and the opening sentence may not have quite the meaning that you think. It is the Christian tradition and its secularised descendant ‘consumerist capitalism’ that are the religious traditions that have typically devalued the natural world by ignoring it. This world is of little significance if salvation is primarily in the next world and the key encounter in this world is between an individual's soul and a transcendent deity seen as Other. Similarly, in consumerist capitalism, talk of the rights of trees, fish, or mountains seems strange when human pleasure and wealth are the criteria by which all actions are judged. I argue that at the heart of the current environmental crisis is the relegation of the environment to something of peripheral significance. This relegation derives from the religious traditions of Christianity and consumer capitalism.
Other religious traditions, such as indigenous traditions, Buddhism, and contemporary Paganism, have very different approaches to the natural world. Typically, these traditions regard this earth as important, and do not consider human pleasure and wealth to be adequate justifications for large-scale environmental destruction. The effects of these religious traditions is clearest in their outcomes: they have fostered human societies that live in a largely ecologically sustainable relationship with the forests, rivers, and animals around them.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Controversies in Environmental Sociology , pp. 8 - 25Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
References
Barry, J. 1999, Environment and Social Theory, New York: Routledge
Berling, J. 2003, ‘Commentary’. In M. E. Tucker, Worldly Wonder: Religions enter their ecological phase, Chicago: Open Court
Berry, T. 2000, ‘Christianity's role in the earth project’. In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
Brown, L., and C. Flavin (eds) 1999, State of the World 1999, London: Earthscan
Buber, M. 1958, I and Thou, transl. R. Smith, New York: Collier Books
Cobb, J. 2000, ‘Christianity, economics, and ecology’. In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
Cowdin, D. 2000, ‘The moral status of otherkind in Christian ethics’. In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
Dutton Y. 2003, ‘The Environmental crisis of our time: a Muslim response’. In R. Foltz, F. Denny and A. Baharuddin (eds) Islam and Ecology, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
Dwivedi, O. 1996, ‘Satyagraha for conservation: awakening the spirit of Hinduism’. In Gottlieb, This Sacred Earth
1998, ‘Theorizing narrative-identity: symbolic interactionism and hermeneutics’, Sociological Quarterly 39(2): 239–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzy, D. 2001, ‘Reading for the plot, and not hearing the story: ecological tragedy and heroic capitalism’. In A. Mills and J. Smith (eds) Utter Silence, New York: Peter Lang
Flannery, T. 1994, The Future Eaters, Sydney: Reed New Holland
Foltz, R. 2003a, Worldviews, Religion, and the Environment, Melbourne: Thomson
Foltz, R. 2003b, ‘Introduction’. In R. Foltz, F. Denny and A. Baharuddin (eds) Islam and Ecology, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
Fox, M. 1991, Creation Spirituality, San Francisco CA: Harper
Fried, S. 2001, ‘Shoot the horse get the rider: religion and forest politics in Bentian Borneo’. In J. Grim (ed.) Indigenous Traditions and Ecology: The interbeing of cosmology and community, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
Garfield, J. 2002, ‘Philosophy, religion, and the hermeneutic imperative’. In J. Malpas, U. Arnswald and J. Kerscher (eds) Gadamer's Century, Cambridge MA: MIT Press
Gottlieb, R. 1996a, ‘Religion in an Age of Environmental Crisis’. In Gottlieb, This Sacred Earth
Gottlieb, R. (ed.) 1996b, This Sacred Earth: Religion, nature, environment, New York: Routledge
Greaves, T. 2001, ‘Contextualizing the Environmental Struggle’. In Grim, Indigenous Traditions and Ecology
Greenwood, S. 2000, Magic, Witchcraft and the Otherworld, Oxford: Berg
Greider, W. 1997, One World, Ready or Not: The manic logic of global capitalism, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin
Grim, J. (ed.) 2001a, Indigenous Traditions and Ecology: The interbeing of cosmology and community, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
Grim, J. 2001b, ‘Introduction’. In Grim, Indigenous Traditions and Ecology
Hallman, D. 2000, ‘Climate change: ethics, justice and sustainable community’. In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
1999, ‘New age spiritualities as secular religion’, Social Compass 46(2): 145–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, I. 1997, ‘Buddhism and the discourse of environmental concern’. In M. Tucker and D. Williams (eds) Buddhism and Ecology, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
Harvey, G. 1997, Listening People, Speaking Earth: Contemporary paganism, Adelaide: Wakefield Press
Haught, J. 1996, ‘“Christianity and Ecology” from The Promise of Nature’. In Gottlieb, This Sacred Earth
Hay, P. 2002, Main Currents in Western Environmental Thought, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press
Heelas, P. 1996, The New Age Movement, Oxford: Blackwell
Hessel, D., and R. Ruether (eds) 2000, Christianity and Ecology, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
Hume, L. 1997, Witchcraft and Paganism in Australia, Melbourne University Press
Johnson, E. 2000, ‘Losing and finding creation in the Christian tradition’. In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
Jones, P. 1999, Gospel Truth, Pagan Lies, Enumclaw, WA: Winepress Publishing
Knitter, P. 2000, ‘Deep ecumenicity versus incommensurability: finding common ground on a common earth’. In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
Lancaster, L. 1997, ‘Buddhism and ecology: collective cultural perceptions’. In M. Tucker and D. Williams (eds) Buddhism and Ecology, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
Letcher, A. 2000, ‘“Virtual paganism” or direct action?’ Diskus 6, http://www.uni-marburg.de/religionswissenschaft/journal/diskus
1997, ‘The religion of the market’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 65(2): 275–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, J. 1991, World as Lover, World as Self, Berkeley CA: Parallax Press
McFague, S. 2000, ‘An ecological Christology: does Christianity have it?’ In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
Namunu, S. 2001, ‘Melanesian religion, ecology and modernization in Papua New Guinea’. In Grim, Indigenous Traditions and Ecology
Nash, R. 1989, The Rights of Nature: A history of environmental ethics, Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press
Posey, D. 2001, ‘Intellectual Property Rights and the Sacred Balance’. In Grim, Indigenous Traditions and Ecology
Robra, M. 2000, ‘Response to Marthinus Daneel’. In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
Ruether, R. R. 1996, ‘Ecofeminism: Symbolic and social connections of the oppression of women and the domination of nature’. In Gottlieb, This Sacred Earth
Ruether, R. R. 2000, ‘Conclusion: eco-justice at the centre of the Church's Mission’. In Hessel and Ruether, Christianity and Ecology
Sharma, B. 1996, ‘On sustainability’. In Gottlieb, This Sacred Earth
Snyder, G. 1990, The Practice of the Wild, San Francisco CA: North Point Press
Sutcliffe, S. 2003, Children of the New Age, New York: Routledge
Suzuki, D. 1997, This Sacred Balance, Sydney: Allen & Unwin
Tucker, Mary 2003, Worldly Wonder: Religions enter their ecological phase, Chicago: Open Court
Walsh, B., M. Karsh and N. Ansell 1996, ‘Trees, forestry, and the responsiveness of creation’. In Gottlieb, This Sacred Earth
Weber, M. 1947, Max Weber: The theory of social and economic organization, transl. T. Parsons, New York: Free Press
Weizsäcker, E., A. Lovins and L. Lovins 1997, Factor 4, London: Earthscan
1967, ‘The historical roots of our ecological crisis’, Science, 155(3767): 1203–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by