Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:32:55.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2024

Carmen Beviá  and
Luis Corchón
Carmen Beviá
Affiliation:
Universidad de Alicante
Luis Corchón
Affiliation:
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Contests
Theory and Applications
 , pp. 199 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. “Rewards structures and the allocation of talent.” European Economic Review, 39, 1, 17–33, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., and Johnson, S.. “Unbundling institutions.” Journal of Political Economy, 113, 5, 949–995, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A.. “The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation.” American Economic Review, 91, 5, 1369–1401, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. A.. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Crown, 2012.Google Scholar
Aiche, A., Einy, E., Haimanko, O., Moreno, D., Sela, A., and Shitovitz, B.. “Tullock contests reward information advantages.” Economics Letters, 172, 34–36, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiche, A., Einy, E., Haimanko, O., Moreno, D., Sela, A., and Shitovitz, B.. “Information in Tullock contests.” Theory and Decision, 86, 3, 303–323, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcalde, J., and Dahm, M.. “Tullock and Hirshleifer: A meeting of the minds.” Review of Economic Design, 11, 2, 101–124, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcalde, J., and Dahm, M.. “Rent seeking and rent dissipation: A neutrality result.” Journal of Public Economics, 94, 1–2, 1–7, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegashie, J. A. “The number of rent-seekers and aggregate rent-seeking expenditures: An unpleasant result.” Public Choice, 99, 1, 57–62, 1999a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegashie, J. A. “The design of rent-seeking competitions: Committees, preliminary and final contests.” Public Choice, 99, 1, 63–76, 1999b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegashie, J. A. “A contest success function with a tractable noise parameter.” Public Choice, 126, 1–2, 135–144, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegashie, J. A. “Productive versus destructive efforts in contests.” European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 4, 461–468, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegashie, J. A., and Runkel, M.. “Sabotaging potential rivals.” Social Choice and Welfare, 28, 1, 143–162, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amegashie, A., and Runkel, M.. “The paradox of revenge in conflicts.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56, 2, 313–330, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anbarci, N., Skaperdas, S., and Syropoulos, C.. “Comparing bargaining solutions in the shadow of conflict.” Journal of Economic Theory, 106, 1, 1–16, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apesteguia, J., and Palacios-Huerta, I.. “Psychological pressure in competitive environments: Evidence from a randomized natural experiment.” American Economic Review, 100, 5, 2548–2564, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbatskaya, M., and Mialon, H.. “Multi-activity contests.” Economic Theory, 43, 1, 23–43, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arteaga, F. “The merchant guilds and the political economy of the Spanish Empire on the eve of independence.” Journal of Historical Political Economy, 2, 2, 299–331, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arve, M., and Serena, M.. “Level-k models and overspending in contests.” Games, 13, 3, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baik, K. H. “Effort levels in contests: The public-good prize case.” Economics Letters, 41, 4, 363–367, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baik, K. H. “Difference-form contest success functions and effort level in contests.” European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 4, 685–701, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baik, K. H., and Shogren, J. F.. “Strategic behavior in contests: Comment.” American Economic Review, 82, 1, 359–362, 1992.Google Scholar
Baland, J.-M., and Francoise, P.. “Rent-seeking and resource booms.” Journal of Development Economics, 61, 2, 527–542, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balard, P., Flamand, S., and Troumpounis, O.. “Strategic choice of sharing rules in collective contests.” Social Choice and Welfare, 46, 2, 239–262, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baliga, S., and Sjöström, T.. “The strategy of manipulating conflict.” American Economic Review, 102, 6, 2897–2922, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baliga, S., and Sjöström, T.. “Bargaining and war: A review of some formal models.” Korean Economic Review, 29, 2, 235–266, 2013.Google Scholar
Baliga, S., and Sjöström, T.. “The causes of war.” In Dube, O., Morelli, M., Ray, D., and Sjöström, T. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Conflict, vol. 2. North Holland, forthcoming 2023.Google Scholar
Barberà, S., and Bevia, C.. “Self-selection consistent functions.” Journal of Economic Theory, 105, 2, 263–277, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, S., and Serena, M.. “Winners’ efforts in multi-battle team contests.” Working paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2019-03, 2019.Google Scholar
Baye, M., and Hoppe, H.. “The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race games.” Games and Economic Behavior, 44, 2, 217–226, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baye, M., Kovenock, D., and de Vries, C.. “Rigging the lobbying process: An application of the all-pay auction.” American Economic Review, 83, 1, 289–294, 1993.Google Scholar
Baye, M., Kovenock, D., and de Vries, C.. “The solution to the Tullock rent-seeking game when R > 2: Mixed-strategy equilibria and mean dissipation rates.” Public Choice, 81, 3, 363–380, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baye, M., Kovenock, D., and de Vries, C.. “The all-pay auction with complete information.” Economic Theory, 8, 2, 291–305, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beccuti, J., and Möller, M.. “Fighting for lemons: The encouragement effect in dynamic competition with private information.” Discussion papers, No. 20-17, Department of Economics, University of Bern, Bern, 2020.Google Scholar
Becker, G. “A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 3, 371–400, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berge, C. Espaces topologiques, fonctions multivoques. 1959. English translation Topological Spaces: Including a Treatment of Multi-Valued Functions, Vector Spaces and Convexity, Dover Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Bernergård, A., and Wärneryd, K.. “Self-allocation in contests.” CESifo working paper, No. 6636, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich, 2017.Google Scholar
Beviá, C., and Corchón, L.. “Rational sabotage in cooperative production with heterogeneous agents.” The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics: Topics, 6, 1–27, 2006.Google Scholar
Beviá, C., and Corchón, L.. “War or peace.” In Aragonés, E., Beviá, C., Llavador, H., and Schofield, N. (eds.), The Political Economy of Democracy. Fundación BBVA, 2009.Google Scholar
Beviá, C., and Corchón, L.. “Peace agreements without commitment.” Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 2, 469–487, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beviá, C., and Corchón, L.. “Endogenous strength in conflicts.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31, 3, 297–306, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beviá, C., and Corchón, L.. “Centralized vs decentralized contests.” Economics Letters, 137, 32–35, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beviá, C., and Corchón, L.. “Dynamic contests with bankruptcy: The despair effect.” The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 16, 1, 217–241, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beviá, C., and Corchón, L.. “Meritocracy, efficiency, incentives and voting.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 89, 1, 87–108, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beviá, C., and Corchón, L.. “Contests with dominant strategies.” Economic Theory, 74, 4, 1–19, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. Fun and Games: A Text on Game Theory. D. C. Heath and Company, 1991.Google Scholar
Blavatskyy, P. R. “Contest success function with the possibility of a draw: Axiomatization.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 46, 2, 267–276, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodoh-Creed, A., and Hickman, B.. “College assignment as a large contest.” Journal of Economic Theory, 175, 344–375, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borel, E. “La théorie du jeu et les équations intégrales à noyau symétrique.” Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 173, 1304–1308, 1921. English translation by Leonard J. Savage, Econometrica, 21, 97–100, 1953.Google Scholar
Brams, S. J., and Kilgour, D.. “The truel.” Mathematics Magazine, 70, 5, 315–326, 1997.Google Scholar
Brito, D. L., and Intriligator, M. D.. “Conflict, war, and redistribution.” The American Political Science Review, 79, 4, 943–957, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookins, P., and Jindapon, P.. “Contest divisioning.” Review of Economic Design, forthcoming 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-022-00311-9Google Scholar
Brown, A., and Chowdhury, S. M.. “The hidden perils of affirmative action: Sabotage in handicap contests.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133, 273–284, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. “Quitters never win: The (adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars.” Journal of Political Economy, 119, 5, 982–1013, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J., and Tullock, G.. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. University of Michigan Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Bulow, J., Geanakoplos, J., and Klemperer, P.. “Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements.” Journal of Political Economy, 93, 3, 488–511, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calsamiglia, C., Franke, J., and Rey-Biel, P.. “The incentive effects of affirmative action in a real-effort tournament.” Journal of Public Economics, 98, 15–31, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, E. “An experimental imperfect market.” Journal of Political Economy, 56, 2, 95–108, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Che, Y.-K., and Gale, I.. “Difference-form contests and the robustness of all-pay auctions.” Games and Economic Behavior, 30, 1, 22–43, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, K.-P. “Sabotage in promotion tournaments.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 19, 1, 119–140, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M. “The attack and defense mechanisms: Perspectives from behavioral economics and game theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, e121, 2019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chowdhury, S. M., Esteve-Gonzalez, P., and Mukherjee, A.. “Hetereogeneity, leveling the playing field, and affirmative action in contests.” Southern Economic Journal, 89, 3, 924–974, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M., Danilov, A., and Kocher, M.. “The lifecycle of affirmative action policies and its effect on effort and sabotage behavior.” CESifo working paper No. 10501, June 14, 2023.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M., and Gürtler, O.. “Sabotage in contests: A survey.” Public Choice, 164, 1, 135–155, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M., Kovenock, D., and Sheremeta, R. M.. “An experimental investigation of Colonel Blotto games.” Economic Theory, 52, 3, 833–861, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M., Lee, D., and Sheremeta, R. M.. “Top guns may not fire: Best-shot group contests with group-specific public good prizes.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 92, 94–103, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M., and Sheremeta, R. M.. “Strategically equivalent contests.” Theory and Decision, 78, 4, 587–601, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, T. Y. “Rent-seeking contest when the prize increases with aggregate efforts.” Public Choice, 87, 1/2, 55–66, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. J., and Konrad, K.. “Contests with multi-tasking.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109, 2, 303–319, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. J., and Nilssen, T.. “Learning by doing in contests.” Public Choice, 156, 1/2, 329–343, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. J., Nilssen, T., and Sand, J. Y.. “Gaining advantage by winning contests.” Review of Economic Design, 24, 1, 23–38, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. J., and Riis, C.. “A multiple-winner nested rent-seeking contest.” Public Choice, 87, 1/2, 177–184, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. J., and Riis, C.. “Contest success functions: An extension.” Economic Theory, 11, 1, 201–204, 1998a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. J., and Riis, C.. “Influence and the discretionary allocation of several prizes.” European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 4, 605–625, 1998b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Clausewitz, C. On War. 1832. Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. “The problem of social cost.” The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. “The institutional structure of production.” University of Chicago Law Occasional Paper 28, 1992.Google Scholar
Cohen, C., and Nitzan, S.. “Advantageous defensive efforts in contests.” Economics Bulletin, 41, 3, 2147–2157, 2021.Google Scholar
Corchón, L. “Comparative statics for aggregative games: The strong concavity case.” Mathematical Social Sciences, 28, 3, 151–165, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corchón, L. “On the allocative effects of rent-seeking.” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2, 4, 483–491, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corchón, L. Theories of Imperfectly Competitive Markets, 2nd ed. Springer, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corchón, L. “The theory of contests: A survey.” Review of Economic Design, 11, 2, 69–100, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corchón, L. “Forms of governance and the size of rent-seeking.” Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 2, 197–210, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corchón, L. “The theory of implementation: What did we learn?” In Meyers, R. A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems. Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Corchón, L. “Aggregative games.” SERIEs. Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 12, 1, 49–71, 2021.Google Scholar
Corchón, L., and Dahm, M.. “Foundations for contest success functions.” Economic Theory, 43, 1, 81–98, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corchón, L., and Dahm, M.. “Welfare maximizing contest success functions when the planner cannot commit.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 47, 3, 309–317, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corchón, L., and Serena, M.. “Properties of contests: Constructing CSF from best responses.” Journal of Dynamics and Games, 9, 2, 151–163, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corchón, L., and Torregrosa, R.. “Entry across markets and contests and some related problems.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=4080919, November 12, 2022.Google Scholar
Corchón, L., and Yildizparlak, A.. “Give peace a chance: The effect of ownership and asymmetric information on peace.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 92, 116–126, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornes, R., and Hartley, R.. “Asymmetric contests with general technologies.” Economic Theory, 26, 4, 923–946, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Corral, J., Prieto-Rodríguez, J., and Simmons, R.. “The effect of incentives on sabotage: The case of Spanish football.” Journal of Sports Economics, 11, 3, 243–260, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, P., and Nitzan, S.. “Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and Nash social welfare maxima.” Journal of Public Economics, 15, 1, 113–121, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubel, M., and Sanchez-Pages, S.. “An axiomatization of difference-form contest success functions.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 132, Part A, 92–105, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cueva, C. “Animal spirits in the beautiful game: Testing social pressure in professional football during the COVID-19 lockdown.” OSF Preprints. doi:10.31219/osf.io/hczkj, September 11, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, N., and Volij, O.. “The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach.” Mathematical Social Sciences, 26, 3, 287–297, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, A., and Nti, K. O.. “Designing an optimal contest.” European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 4, 587–603, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P., and Maskin, E.. “The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, I: Theory.” Review of Economic Studies, 53, 1, 1–26, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D., and Reilly, R.. “Rent seeking with non-identical sharing rules: An equilibrium rescued.” Public Choice, 100, 1–2, 31–38, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., and Sheremeta, R. M.. “A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments.” Experimental Economics 18, 4, 609–669, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, A., MacKenzie, I., and Sekeris, P.. “Rent dissipation in simple Tullock contests.” Games, 13, 6, 83, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dincecco, M. “Fiscal centralization, limited government, and public revenues in Europe, 1650–1913.” The Journal of Economic History, 69, 1, 48–103, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. “Strategic behavior in contests.” American Economic Review, 77, 5, 891–898, 1987.Google Scholar
Doğan, S., Karagözoğlu, E., Keskin, K., and Sağlam, Ç.. “Large Tullock contests.” Journal of Economics, 140, 2, 169–179, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğan, S., Keskin, K., and Sağlam, Ç.. “Sabotage in team contests.” Public Choice, 180, 3/4, 383–405, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drugov, M., and Ryvkin, D.. “Biased contests for symmetric players.” Games and Economic Behavior, 103, 116–144, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, R. G., and Bognanno, M. L.. “Do tournaments have incentive effects?” Journal of Political Economy, 98, 6, 1307–1324, 1990a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, R. G., and Bognanno, M. L.. “The incentive effects of tournaments revisited: Evidence from the European PGA Tour.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 3, 74-S–88-S, 1990b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einy, E., Haimanko, O., Moreno, D., Sela, A., and Shitovitz, B.. “Equilibrium existence in Tullock contests with incomplete information.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 61, 241–245, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einy, E., Moreno, D., and Sela, A.. “Continuity and robustness of Bayesian equilibria in Tullock contests.” Economic Theory Bulletin, 8, 2, 333–345,2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, R. B., Street, D. R., and Tollinson, R. D.. “Rent-seeking and property rights’ assignment as a process: The Mesta Cartel of Medieval-Mercantile Spain.” Journal of European Economic History, 1, 9–35, 1997.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R. B., and Tollinson, R. D.. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society. College Station, Texas A&M University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Epstein, G. S., Mealem, Y., and Nitzan, S.. “Lotteries vs. all-pay auctions in fair and biased contests.” Economics and Politics, 25, 1, 48–60, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, G. S., and Nitzan, S.. “The politics of randomness.” Social Choice and Welfare, 27, 2, 423–443, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, G. S., and Nitzan, S.. Endogenous Public Policy and Contests. Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
Esteban-Marquillas, J., and Ray, D.. “Collective action and the group paradox.” American Political Science Review, 95, 3, 663–672, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewerhart, C. “Unique equilibrium in rent-seeking contests with a continuum of types.” Economics Letters, 125, 1, 115–118, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewerhart, C. “Mixed equilibria in Tullock contests.” Economic Theory, 60, 1, 59–71, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewerhart, C. “Contests with small noise and the robustness of the all-pay auction.” Games and Economic Behavior, 105, 195–211, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewerhart, C., and Quartieri, F.. “Unique equilibrium in contests with incomplete information.” Economic Theory, 70, 1, 243–271, 2020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewerhart, C., and Serena, M.. “On the (im-)possibility of representing probability distributions as a difference of I.I.D. noise terms.” Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Zurich. www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/231569/1/econwp428.pdf, 2023.Google Scholar
Falcone, S., and Rosenberg, M.. “Agricultural modernization and land conflict.” Mimeo, 2023.Google Scholar
Ewerhart, C., and Sun, G. Z.. “The n-player Hirshleifer contest.” Working paper, No. 361, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-189517, 2022.Google Scholar
Fang, H. “Lottery versus all-pay auction models of lobbying.” Public Choice, 112, 3/4, 351–371, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, J., Mixon, F. G. Jr, Caudill, S. B., and Wineke, S. J.. “Two-dimensional effort in patent-race games and rent-seeking contests: The case of telephony.” Games, 5, 2, 116–126, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, A., and Pecorino, P.. “Legal expenditure as a rent-seeking game.” Public Choice, 100, 3/4, 271–288, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J. D. “Rationalist explanations for war.” International Organization, 49, 3, 379–414, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flamand, S., and Troumpounis, O.. “Prize-sharing rules in collective rent seeking.” In Congleton, R. D. and Hillman, A. L. (eds.), Companion to the Political Economy of Rent Seeking. Edward Elgar, 2015.Google Scholar
Franke, J. “The incentive effects of levelling the playing field – An empirical analysis of amateur golf tournaments.” Applied Economics, 44, 9, 1193–1200, 2012a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, J. “Affirmative action in contest games.” European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 1, 105–118, 2012b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, J., Kanzow, C., Leininger, W., and Schwartz, A.. “Effort maximization in asymmetric contest games with heterogeneous contestants.” Economic Theory, 52, 2, 589–630, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, J., Kanzow, C., Leininger, W., and Schwartz, A.. “Lottery versus all-pay auction contests: A revenue dominance theorem.” Games and Economic Behavior 83, 116–126, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, J., and Metzger, L.. “Repeated contests with draws.” Ruhr economic papers No. 1016, 2023.Google Scholar
Franke, J., and Öztürk, T.. “Conflict networks.” Journal of Public Economics, 126, 104–113, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J. “A noncooperative equilibrium for supergames.” Review of Economic Studies, 38, 1, 1–12, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, L. “Game theory models in the allocation of advertising expenditures.” Operations Research, 6, 5, 699–709, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Q. “Endogeneous timing of contest with asymmetric information.” Public Choice, 129, 1/2, 1–23. 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Q., and Lu, J.. “Micro foundations of multi-prize lottery contests: A perspective of noisy performance ranking.” Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 3, 497–517, 2012a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Q., and Lu, J.. “The optimal multi-stage contests.” Economics Theory, 51, 2, 351–382, 2012b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Q., Lu, J., and Pan, Y.. “Team contests with multiple pairwise battles.” American Economic Review, 105, 7, 2120–2140, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Q., and Wu, W.. “Contests theory and topics, a survey on theoretical studies of contests.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics, 2019.Google Scholar
Fu, Q., and Wu, W.. “On the optimal design of biased contests.” Theoretical Economics, 15, 4, 1435–1470, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J.. Game Theory. The MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fullerton, R. L., and McAfee, R. P.. “Auctioning entry into tournaments.” Journal of Political Economy, 107, 3, 573–605, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L., Lu, J., and Wang, Z.. “Equilibria in two-player sequential Tullock contests.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=4322145, January 4, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, M. R., and Skaperdas, S.. “Conflict without misperceptions or incomplete information: How the future matters.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44, 6, 793–807, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, M. R., and Syropoulos, C.. “Self-enforcing peace agreements that preserve the status quo.” Games and Economic Behavior, 130, 148–178, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelder, A., and Kovenock, D.. “Dynamic behavior and player types in majoritarian multi-battle contests.” Games and Economic Behavior, 104, 444–455, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilsdorf, K., and Sukhatme, V.. “Testing Rosen’s sequential: Elimination tournament model incentives and player performance in professional tennis.” Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 3, 287-303, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaezer, E., La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A.. “Do institutions cause growth?” Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 3, 271–303, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, A., and Hassin, R.. “Sequential rent seeking.” Public Choice, 102, 3/4, 219–228, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, S., and Goyal, A.. “Optimal tie-breaking rules.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 108, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, J. Through a Window: My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe. Mariner Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Gradstein, M. “Intensity of competition: Entry and entry deterrence in rent-seeking contests.” Economics and Politics, 7, 1, 79–91, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradstein, M. “Governance and growth.” Journal of Development Economics, 73, 2, 505–518, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, H. “A general equilibrium model of insurrections.” American Economic Review, 81, 4, 912–921, 1991.Google Scholar
Grossman, G., and Helpman, E.. Interest Groups and Trade Policy. Princeton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürtler, O. “On sabotage in collective tournaments.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 44, 3–4, 383–393, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürtler, O., and Münster, J.. “Sabotage in dynamic tournaments.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 46, 2, 179–190, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürtler, O., Münster, J., and Nieken, P.. “Information policy in tournaments with sabotage.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115, 3, 932–966, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, A., Gustavsson, P., and Halvarsson, D.. “Subsidy entrepreneurs: An inquiry into firms seeking public grants.” Journal of Industry, Competition & Trade, 20, 3, 439–478, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J. M., and Slutsky, S. M.. “Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria.“ Games and Economic Behavior, 2, 1, 29–46, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harberger, A. “Monopoly and resource allocation.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 44, 2, 77–87, 1954.Google Scholar
Hardy, I. C. W., and Briffa, M.. Animal Contests. Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. “Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players, I–III.” Management Science, 14, 3, 159–183 (Part I); 14, 5, 320–334 (Part II); 14, 7, 486–502 (Part III), 1967–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausken, K. “Production and conflict models versus rent-seeking models.” Public Choice, 123, 1/2, 59–93, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, F. “Third-party intervention in secessions.” Economics of Governance, 23, 1, 65–82, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A., and Katz, E.. “Risk-averse rent seekers and the social cost of monopoly power.” The Economic Journal, 94, 373, 104–110, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A., and Riley, J.. “Politically contestable rents and transfers.” Economics and Politics, 1, 1, 17–39, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinnosaar, T. “Optimal sequential contests.” Forthcoming in Theoretical Economics, 2023.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. “Conflict and rent-seeking success functions: Ratio vs. difference models of relative success.” Public Choice, 63, 2, 101–112, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. “The paradox of power.” Economics and Politics, 3, 3, 177–200, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. “The dark side of the force.” Economic Inquiry, 32, 1, 1–10, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P. “Why was it Europeans who conquered the world?” The Journal of Economic History, 72, 3, 601–633, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, M., and Rota-Graziosi, G.. “Endogenous timing in general rent-seeking and conflict models.” Games and Economic Behavior, 75, 1, 168–184, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, M., and Rota-Graziosi, G.. “Endogenous timing in contest.” In Corchón, L. and Marini, M. (eds.) Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization. Edward Elgar, 2018, 147–174.Google Scholar
Hurley, T., and Shogren, J.. “Asymmetric information contests.” European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 4, 645–665, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S.-H. “Technology of military conflict, military spending, and war.” Journal of Public Economics, 96, 1/2, 226–236, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M., and Morelli, M.. “Political bias and war.” American Economic Review, 97, 4, 1353–1373, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M., and Morelli, M.. “The reasons for wars – An updated survey.” In Coyne, C. (ed.), Handbook on the Political Economy of War. Elgar Publishing, 2011, 34–57.Google Scholar
Jamison, E., Jamison, D., and Hanushek, E.. “The effects of education quality on mortality decline and income growth.” Economics of Education Review, 26, 2, 772–789, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, C., and Sanchez-Pages, S.. “Social capital, conflict and welfare.” Journal of Development Economics, 124, 157–167, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetter, M., Agudelo, A., and Hassan, A.. “The effect of democracy on corruption: Income is key.” World Development, 74, 286–304, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, H. “A stochastic derivation of the Ratio Form of contest success functions.” Public Choice, 135, 3/4, 125–130, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, H. “Contests with the probability of a draw: A stochastic foundation.” The Economic Record, 88, 282, 391–406, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, H., Skaperdas, S., and Vaidya, S.. “Contest functions: Theoretical foundations and issues in estimation.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31, 3, 211–222, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, C., Krutilla, K., Viscusi, W. K., and Boyd, R.. “The Coase theorem in a rent-seeking society.” International Review of Law and Economics, 15, 3, 259–268, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahana, N., and Klunover, D.. “Sequential lottery contests with multiple participants.” Economics Letters, 163, 126–129, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk.” Econometrica, 47, 2, 313–327, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E., Nitzan, S., and Rosenberg, J.. “Rent-seeking for pure public goods.” Public Choice, 65, 1, 49–60, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Penguin Random House, 1987.Google Scholar
Kimbrough, E. O., Laughren, K., and Sheremeta, R.. “War and conflict in economics: Theories, applications, and recent trends.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 998–1013, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkegaard, R. “Favoritism in asymmetric contests: Head starts and handicaps.” Games and Economic Behavior, 76, 1, 226–248, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klumpp, T., and Polborn, M. K.. “Primaries and the New Hampshire effect.” Journal of Public Economics, 90, 6–7, 1073–1114, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klunover, D. “Punishment for sabotage in dynamic tournaments.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 106, May, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmar, M., and Rommeswinkel, H.. “Contests with group-specific public goods and complementarities in efforts.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 89, 9–22, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, K. “Sabotage in rent-seeking contests.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 16, 1, 155–165, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, K. Strategy and Dynamics in Contests. Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, K., and Kovenock, D.. “Multi-battle contests.” Games and Economic Behavior, 66, 1, 256–274, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, K., and Kovenock, D.. “Equilibrium and efficiency in the tug-of-war.” CESifo working paper series No. 1564, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovenock, D., and Roberson, B.. “Generalizations of the General Lotto and Colonel Blotto games.” Economic Theory, 71, 3, 997–1032, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. “The political economy of the rent-seeking society.” American Economic Review, 64, 3, 291–303, 1974.Google Scholar
Krumer, A., and Lechner, M.. “First in first win: Evidence on schedule effects in round-robin tournaments in mega-events.” European Economic Review, 100, 412–427, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, S., and Ono, Y.. “Helping minor firms reduces welfare.” The Economic Journal, 98, 393, 1199–1202, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahkar, R., and Mukherjee, S.. “Optimal large population Tullock contests.” Oxford Open Economics, 2, 1–11, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahkar, R., and Sultana, R.. “Rent dissipation in large population Tullock contests.” Public Choice, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01103-72, 2023.Google Scholar
Lanchester, F. W. “Mathematics in warfare.” In Newman, J. (ed.), The World of Mathematics, Simon & Shusterin, vol.4, 2138–2157, 1956; anthologized from Aircraft in Warfare Constable and Co. Ltd. 1916.Google Scholar
Lazear, E. P. “Pay equality and industrial politics.” Journal of Political Economy, 97, 3, 561–580. 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E. P., and Rosen, S.. “Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts.” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 5, 841–864, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. “Weakest-link contests with group-specific public good prizes.” European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 2, 238–248, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. “Endogenous sharing rules in collective-group rent seeking.” Public Choice, 85, 1–2, 31–44, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. K., and Hahn, K.. “Bid-rigging in auctions for Korean public-works contracts and potential damage.” Review of Industrial Organization, 21, 1, 73–88, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leininger, W. “More efficient rent seeking – A Munchausen solution.” Public Choice, 75, 1, 43–62, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leininger, W., and Yang, C.-L.. “Dynamic rent-seeking games.” Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 3, 406–427, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., and Zheng, J.. “Pure strategy Nash equilibrium in 2-contestant generalized lottery Colonel Blotto games.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 103, December 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbeck, A., and Weibull, J. W.. “Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition.” Public Choice, 52, 3, 273–297, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, B., and Lu, J.. “Optimal orchestration of rewards and punishments in rank-order contests.” Journal of Economic Theory, 208, 105594, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2022.105594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Lu, J. and Salvo, A.. “Willingness to fight on: Environmental quality in dynamic contests.” The Rand Journal of Economics, 54, 2, 189–239, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loury, G. C. “Market structure and innovation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 3, 395–410, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Z., and Xin, X.. “A model of rivalries with endogenous prize and strength.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 152, 215–223, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N. Il Principe. Antonio Blado d’Asola, 1532.Google Scholar
Maci, M. “Private enforcement in bid-rigging cases in the European union.” European Competition Journal. 8, 1, 211–227, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malueg, D., and Yates, A.. “Rent seeking with private values.” Public Choice, 119, 1/2, 161–178, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malueg, D., and Yates, A.. “Equilibria in rent-seeking contests with homogeneous success functions.” Economic Theory, 27, 3, 719–727, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F.. Manifesto of the Communist Party. London 1848. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. Das Kapital. Edited by Meissner, Otto. Hamburg, 1867.Google Scholar
Masera, F. “Violent crime and the overmilitarization of US policing.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 37, 3, 479–511, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H., Sommers, P. M., and Peschiera, F. J.. “Incentives and superstars on the LPGA tour.” Applied Economics, 39, 1, 87–94, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, W. (ed.). The Making of the Presidential Candidates. Rowman and Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar
Mayoral, L., and Ray, D.. “Groups in conflict: Private and public prizes.” Journal of Development Economics, 154, Article 102759, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, D. “The measurement of urban travel demand.” Journal of Public Economics, 3, 4, 303–328, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey & Company. “And the winner is … Capturing the promise of philanthropic prizes.” www.mckinsey.com/industries/social-sector/our-insights/and-the-winner-is-philanthropists-and-governments-make-prizes-count?cid=eml-web, May 2009.Google Scholar
Mealem, Y., and Nitzan, S.. “Discrimination in contests: A survey.” Review of Economic Design, 20, 2, 145–172, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. “The Matthew effect in science.” Science, 159, 3810, 56–63, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, B. Capitalism Alone. Harvard University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Mildenberger, C. D., and Pietri, A.. “How does size matter for military success? Evidence from virtual worlds.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 154, 137–155, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchuk, Y., Keren, B., and Hadad, Y.. “Sabotaging in contests with monitoring efforts.” Managerial and Decision Economics, 39, 6, 674–681, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moatsos, M. “Global extreme poverty: Present and past since 1820.” In How Was Life? Volume II: New Perspectives on Well-Being and Global Inequality since 1820. OECD, 2021.Google Scholar
Moldovanu, B., and Sela, A.. “The optimal allocation of prizes in contests.” American Economic Review, 91, 3, 542–558, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, M. “Incentives versus competitive balance.” Economics Letters, 117, 2, 505–508, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, P., and Munshi, S.. “Conflict with third-party intervention and revenge: A game-theoretic exploration.” Defence and Peace Economics, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10242694.2022.2065187.Google Scholar
Münster, J. “Simultaneous inter- and intra-group conflicts.” Economic Theory, 32, 2, 333–352, 2007a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münster, J. “Selection tournaments, sabotage, and participation.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 4, 943–970, 2007b.Google Scholar
Münster, J. “Contests with investment.” Managerial and Decision Economics, 28, 8, 849–862, 2007c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münster, J. “Repeated contests with asymmetric information.” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 11, 1, 89–118, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W.. “The allocation of talent: Implications for growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 2, 503–530, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, R. B. “Emile Borel and the foundations of game theory.” Prepared for Nobel Symposium “One Hundred Years of Game Theory.” https://home.uchicago.edu/\char126\relaxrmyerson/research/boreltalk.pdf, 2021.Google Scholar
Myerson, R. B., and Satterthwaite, M. A.. “Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading.” Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 2, 265–281, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalebuff, B., and Stiglitz, J. E.. “Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 1, 21–43, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. F. “Equilibrium points in N-person games.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36, 1, 48–49, 1950a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, J. F. “The bargaining problem.” Econometrica, 18, 2, 155–162, 1950b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, H. “A comparison of rent-seeking models and economic models of conflict.” Public Choice, 93, 3–4, 373–388, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neugart, M., and Richiardi, M.. “Sequential teamwork in competitive environments: Theory and evidence from swimming data.” European Economic Review, 63 (C), 186–205, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitzan, S. “Collective rent dissipation.” The Economic Journal, 101, 409, 1522–1534, 1991a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitzan, S. “Rent seeking with non-identical sharing rules.” Public Choice, 71, 1–2, 43–50, 1991b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitzan, S. “Modelling rent-seeking contests.” European Journal of Political Economy, 10, 1, 41–60, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitzan, S., and Ueda, K.. “Prize sharing in collective contests.” European Economic Review, 55, 5, 678–687, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D., and Weingast, B.. “Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England.” The Journal of Economic History, XLIX, 4, 1989.Google Scholar
Nti, K. O. “Comparative statics of contests and rent-seeking games.” International Economic Review, 38, 1, 43–59, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nti, K. O. “Effort and performance in group contests.” European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 4, 769–781, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, J. B., and Sanchez, N.. “The efficiency of the Mesta: A parable.” Explorations in Economic History, 26, 3, 261–284, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Olszewski, W., and Siegel, R.. “Large contests.” Econometrica, 84, 2, 835–854, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, M., and Rubinstein, A.. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Osipov, M. “The influence of the number of combatants on their losses.” Military Collection, 1915. Translated by RL Helmbold, AS Rehm at Naval Research Logistics 42, 435–490, 1995.Google Scholar
Parente, S. L., and Prescott, E. C.. “Monopoly rights: A barrier to riches.” American Economic Review, 89, 5, 1216–1233, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parente, S. L., and Prescott, E. C.. Barriers to Riches. The Walras-Pareto Lectures, École des hautes études commerciales, Université de Laussane. The MIT Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perc, M. “The Matthew effect in empirical data.” Journal of the Royal Society, 11, 2014. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378.Google Scholar
Pérez-Castrillo, D., and Verdier, T.. “A general analysis of rent-seeking games.” Public Choice, 71, 3, 335–350, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Ploeg, F. “Natural resources: Curse or blessing.” Journal of Economic Literature, 49, 2, 366–420, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polishchuk, L. I., and Tonis, A.. “Endogenous contest success functions: A mechanism design approach.” Economic Theory, 52, 1, 271–297, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L., and Rodríguez-Caballero, C. V.. “War, pandemics, and modern economic growth in Europe.” Explorations in Economic History, 86, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2022.101467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protopappas, K. “Manipulation of moves in sequential contests.” Social Choice and Welfare, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-023-01461-7, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinganum, J. “The timing of innovation: Research, development and diffusion.” In Willig, R. and Schmalensee, R. (eds.),. North-Holland, 49-908, 1989.Google Scholar
Reny, P. J. “Nash equilibrium in discontinuous games.” Economic Theory, 61, 553–569, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberson, B. “The Colonel Blotto game.” Economic Theory, 29, 1, 1–24, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, J. E. Theories of Distributive Justice. Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. “Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments.” American Economic Review, 76, 4, 701–715, 1986.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. “External players in the political economy of natural resources.” Mimeo, 2020.Google Scholar
Ryvkin, D. “Contests with doping.” Journal of Sports Economics, 14, 3, 253–275, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Pages, S. “On the social efficiency of conflict.” Economics Letters, 90, 1, 96–101, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, M. E. “Are profit maximizers the best survivors? A Darwinian model of economic natural selection.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, 1, 29–45, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, Z., and Skaperdas, S.. “Bargaining and conflict with up-front investments: How power asymmetries matter.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 176, 212–225, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharfstein, D. “Product-market competition and managerial slack.” Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 1, 147–155, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharfstein, D., and Stein, J.. “The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment.” Journal of Finance, 55, 6, 2537–2564, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sela, A. “Best-of-three all-pay auctions.” Economics Letters, 112, 1, 67–70, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sela, A. “Optimal allocations of prizes and punishments in Tullock contests.” International Journal of Game Theory, 49, 3, 749–771, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. “Labour allocation in a cooperative enterprise.” Review of Economic Studies, 33, 4, 361–371, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serena, M. “Quality contests.” European Journal of Political Economy, 46, 15–25, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serena, M. “Harnessing beliefs to optimally disclose contestants’ types.” Economic Theory, 74, 763–792, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R. “Sixty-seven years of the Nash program: Time for retirement?” SERIEs, 12, 1, 35–48, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, S., and Shogren, J.. “Infinitely repeated contests: How strategic interaction affects the efficiency of governance.” Regulation & Governance, 2, 2, 234–252, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, C., and Varian, H.. Information Rules. Harvard Business School Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Sheremeta, R. S. “Behavior in group contests: A review of experimental research.” Journal of Economic Surveys, 32, 3, 683–704, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shubik, M. “Does the fittest necessarily survive?” In Shubik, M. (ed.), Readings in Game Theory and Political Behavior. Doubleday. 1954.Google Scholar
Sisak, D. “Multiple-prize contests – The optimal allocation of prizes.” Journal of Economic Surveys, 23, 1, 82–114, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaperdas, S. “Contest success functions.” Economic Theory, 7, 2, 283–290, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaperdas, S., and Grofman, B.. “Modeling negative campaigning.” American Political Science Review, 89, 1, 49–61, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaperdas, S., and Vaidya, S.. “Persuasion as a contest.” Economic Theory, 51, 2, 465–486, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J. “Election goals and the allocation of campaign resources.” Econometrica, 57, 3, 637–660, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stackelberg, H. Markform und Gleichgewicht. Verlag von Julius Springer, 1934.Google Scholar
Tzu, Sun. The Art of War. https://sites.ualberta.ca/~enoch/Readings/The_Art_Of_War.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sydsæter, K., and Hammond, P.. Essential Mathematics for Economic Analysis, 4th ed. Pearson, 2012.Google Scholar
Szidarovsky, F., and Okuguchi, K.. “On the existence and uniqueness of pure Nash equilibrium in rent-seeking games.” Games and Economic Behavior, 18, 1, 135–140, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymanski, S. “The economic design of sporting contests.” Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 4, 1137–1187, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. The MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Torvik, R. “Natural resources, rent-seeking and welfare.” Journal of Development Economics, 67, 2, 455–470, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, G. “The welfare cost of tariffs, monopolies and theft.” Western Economic Journal, 5, 3, 224–232, 1967.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. “Efficient rent-seeking.” In Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D., and Tullock, G. (eds.), Towards a Theory of a Rent-Seeking Society, Texas A&M University Press, 97–112, 1980.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. “Why did the Industrial Revolution occur in England?” In Rowley, C. K., , R. D.Tollison, , and Tullock, G. (eds.), The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy, vol. 1. Springer, 1988.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. “The origin rent-seeking concept.” International Journal of Business and Economics, 2, 1, 1–8, 2003.Google Scholar
Ueda, K. “Oligopolization in collective rent seeking.” Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 3, 613–626, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, D. “The dynastic cycle and the stationary state.” The American Economic Review, 79, 5, 1031–1044, 1989.Google Scholar
Vázquez-Sedano, A. “Sharing the effort costs in collective contests.” The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 18, 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Vela Tejada, J. “Warfare, history and literature in the archaic and classical periods: The development of Greek military treatises.” Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, Franz Steiner Verlag, 129–146, 2004.Google Scholar
Vesperoni, A., and Yildizparlak, A.. “Contests with draws: Axiomatization and equilibrium.” Economic Inquiry, 57, 3, 1597–1616, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickrey, W. “Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders.” The Journal of Finance, 16, 1, 8–37, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vives, X. Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. The MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Vojnovic, M. Contest Theory: Incentive Mechanisms and Ranking Methods. Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, B. “The firm in Illyria: Market syndicalism.” American Economic Review, 48, 4, 566–589, 1958.Google Scholar
Wärneryd, K. “Distributional conflict and jurisdictional organization.” Journal of Public Economics, 69, 3, 435–450, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wärneryd, K. “Replicating contests.” Economics Letters, 71, 3, 323–327, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wärneryd, K. “Information in conflicts.” Journal of Economic Theory, 110, 1, 121–136, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, A. “Contests with gender bias: Evidence from a culinary competition.” Applied Economics, 54, 60, 6875–6886, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Weizsäcker, C. C. “A welfare analysis of barriers to entry.” Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 2, 399–420, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, J., Zhang, C., and Zhang, J.. “Three-player sequential contests with asymmetric valuations.” Operations Research Letters, 48, 5, 635–640, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yildizparlak, A. “An application of contest success functions for draws on European soccer.” Journal of Sports Economics, 19, 8, 1191–1212, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Carmen Beviá, Universidad de Alicante, Luis Corchón, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  • Book: Contests
  • Online publication: 30 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009504409.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Carmen Beviá, Universidad de Alicante, Luis Corchón, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  • Book: Contests
  • Online publication: 30 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009504409.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Carmen Beviá, Universidad de Alicante, Luis Corchón, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  • Book: Contests
  • Online publication: 30 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009504409.020
Available formats
×