Constitutional Adjudication and Interpretation

IV - Constitutional Adjudication and Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022

Edited by

David S. Law

Show author details

David S. Law: Affiliation:
University of Virginia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Constitutionalism in Context , pp. 183 - 260

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108699068 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Halmai, Gábor, ‘Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments and New Constitutions in Comparative Perspective’ (2015) 50(4) Wake Forest Law Review 951.Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey, ‘An Unconstitutional Constitution? A Comparative Perspective’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 460.Google Scholar

Roznai, Yaniv, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment: The Limits of Amendment Powers (Oxford University Press, 2017), chs. 1–2, 7–8.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Constitutional Choices in Taiwan: Implications of Global Trends,’ in Society, Taiwan Law (ed.), 主權、憲法與台灣的未來 [Sovereignty, the Constitution, and the Future of Taiwan] (Angle Publishing, 2006), available at ssrn.com/abstract=877154.Google Scholar

Kuo, Ming-Sung, ‘Moving Towards a Nominal Constitutional Court? Critical Reflections on the Shift from Judicial Activism to Constitutional Irrelevance in Taiwan’s Constitutional Politics’ (2016) 25(3) Washington International Law Journal 597–641.Google Scholar

Yeh, Jiunn-rong, The Constitution of Taiwan: A Contextual Analysis (Hart, 2016).Google Scholar

De Visser, Maartje, Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Hart, 2014), ch. 1.Google Scholar

Feldman, David, ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation and Human Rights’ (2002) Public Law 323.Google Scholar

Hiebert, Janet, ‘Legislative Rights Review: Addressing the Gap Between Ideals and Constraints,’ in Hunt, Murray, Hooper, Hayley and Yowell, Paul (eds.), Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart, 2015) 39.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, ‘Constitutional Engagement “Outside the Courts” (and “Inside the Legislature”),’ in Bauman, Richard and Kahana, Tsvi (eds.), The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge University Press, 2006) 378.Google Scholar

Besselink, Leonard, et al. (eds.), Constitutional Law of the EU Member States (Kluwer, 2014) 1203–1239.Google Scholar

Kraan, Karel, ‘The Kingdom of the Netherlands,’ in Prakke, Lucas and Kortmann, Constantijn (eds.), Constitutional Law of 15 EU Member States (Kluwer Law International, 2005) 591.Google Scholar

Voermans, Wim, ‘Constitutional Law,’ in Chorus, Jeroen, Hondius, Ewoud and Voermans, Wim (eds.), Introduction to Dutch Law, 5th ed. (Wolters Kluwer, 2016) 317.Google Scholar

Zoethout, Carla M., ‘On Blasphemy, an Idealistic Constitutional Provision and Militant Democracy: Constitutional Topics in the Netherlands’ (2016) 22 European Public Law 461.Google Scholar

Andenas, Mads and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds.), Courts and Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), particularly part III (“Comparative law within a European and international law context”) and part V (“Constitutional courts as users of comparative law”).Google Scholar

Claes, Monica, Visser, Maartje De, Popelier, Patricia and Heyning, Catherine Van de (eds.), Constitutional Conversations in Europe: Actors, Topics and Procedures (Intersentia, 2012), chs. 1, 7.Google Scholar

Groppi, Tania and Ponthoreau, Marie-Claire (eds.), The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges (Hart, 2013), chs. 2 (Canada), 3 (India), 5 (Israel), 7 (South Africa), 11 (Japan), 14 (Russia), 15 (Taiwan), and 16 (United States).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton University Press, 2004), ch. 2.Google Scholar

Amtenbrink, Fabian and Vedder, Hans H.B., European Union Law: A Textbook (Eleven International, 2021), chs. I (introduction), II (nature of the European legal order), III (institutional framework), V (legal protection in the European Union), and XI (development of European integration in context).Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), chs. 1 (Bruno de Witte) and 4 (Daniel Halberstam).Google Scholar

Schütze, Robert, European Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2016), chs. 1 (constitutional history), 3 (direct effect), 4 (supremacy/pre-emption), 10 (European judicial procedures), 11 (national judicial procedures), and 12 (EU fundamental rights).Google Scholar

Torres Pérez, Aida, Conflicts of Rights in the European Union: A Theory of Supranational Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2009), particularly part III on “judicial dialogue.”Google Scholar