Book contents
- Constitutional Transition and the Travail of Judges
- Constitutional Transition and the Travail of Judges
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Making of the Constitution and the Courts, 1945–1962
- 3 Jurisprudential Evolution, 1962–1972
- 4 The Yusin Era, 1972–1980 (1): The Laws
- 5 The Yusin Era, 1972–1980 (2): The Courts
- 6 The Yusin Era, 1972–1980 (3): The Judges
- 7 Political Transitions and Rule of Law, 1980–1987
- 8 Democracy and Travails of Judges, 1987 to the Present
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2019
Book contents
- Constitutional Transition and the Travail of Judges
- Constitutional Transition and the Travail of Judges
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Making of the Constitution and the Courts, 1945–1962
- 3 Jurisprudential Evolution, 1962–1972
- 4 The Yusin Era, 1972–1980 (1): The Laws
- 5 The Yusin Era, 1972–1980 (2): The Courts
- 6 The Yusin Era, 1972–1980 (3): The Judges
- 7 Political Transitions and Rule of Law, 1980–1987
- 8 Democracy and Travails of Judges, 1987 to the Present
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constitutional Transition and the Travail of JudgesThe Courts of South Korea, pp. 324 - 344Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alexy, Robert. The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.Google Scholar
An, Tong-Il. 10.26 ŭn ajikto sara itta: An Tong-Il pyŏnhosa ka tŭllyŏ chunŭn 10.26 sakŏn, kŭ chinsil kwa kŏjit [The October 26th Is Still Alive: The October 26th Incident Told by Attorney An Tong-Il, Its Truth and Lies]. Seoul: Raendŏm Hausŭ Chungang, 2005.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Charles K. “America’s Korea, Korea’s Vietnam.” Critical Asian Studies 33, no. 4 (2001): 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, Robert. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Barros, Robert. “Courts Out of Context: Authoritarian Sources of Judicial Failure in Chile (1973–1990) and Argentina (1976–1983).” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 156–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Barros, Robert. “Dictatorship and the Rule of Law: Rules and Military Power in Pinochet’s Chile.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam, 188–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bedner, Adriaan. “An Elementary Approach to the Rule of Law.” The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 2, no. 1 (2010): 48–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Lawrence Ward, ed. Constitutional Systems in Late Twentieth Century Asia. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bender, Paul. “The Retroactive Effect of an Overruling Constitutional Decision: Mapp v. Ohio.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 110 (1962): 650–683.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty, 118–172. London: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. “Radbruch’s Formula and Conceptual Analysis.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 56 (2011): 45–57.Google Scholar
Bourgon, Jérôme. “The Principle of Legality and Legal Rules in the Chinese Legal Tradition.” In China, Democracy, and Law, edited by Delmas-Marty, Mireille and Will, Pierre-Etienne, 169–188. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Bourgon, Jérôme, and Roux, Pierre-Emmanuel. “The Chosŏn Law Codes in an East Asian Perspective.” In The Spirit of Korean Law: Korean Legal History in Context, edited by Kim, Marie Seong-Hak, 19–54. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2016.Google Scholar
Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Peter C. Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Carmen, Rolando V. del. “Constitutionalism and the Supreme Court in a Changing Philippine Polity.” Asian Survey 13 (1973): 1050–1061.Google Scholar
Carmen, Rolando V. del. “Constitutionality and Judicial Politics.” In Marcos and Martial Law in the Philippines, edited by Rosenberg, David A., 85–112. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. “The Rule of Law Revival.” Foreign Affairs 77, no. 2 (1998): 95–106.Google Scholar
Cha, Victor D. “Bridging the Gap: The Strategic Context of the 1965 Korea–Japan Normalization Treaty.” Korean Studies 20 (1996): 123–160.Google Scholar
Chang, Paul. Protest Dialectics: State Repression and South Korea’s Democracy Movement, 1970–1979. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Chang, Yŏng-Su. “Kyubŏm t’ongje ŭi ponjil e pich’uŏ pon Taebŏpwŏn kwa Hŏnpŏp Chaep’anso ŭi yŏkhal” [The Role of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court Seen in Terms of Normative Control]. Koryŏ pŏphak 55 (2009): 39–71.Google Scholar
Chen, Albert H. Y. “Emergency Powers, Constitutionalism and Legal Transplants: The East Asian Experience.” In Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality, edited by Ramraj, Victor V. and Thiruvengadam, Arun K., 56–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Chinsil-Hwahae Rŭl Wihan Kwagŏsa Chŏngni Wiwŏnhoe. Truth and Reconciliation: Activities of the Past Three Years, edited by An, Pyŏng-Uk. Seoul: Chinsil-Hwahae Rŭl Wihan Kwagŏsa Chŏngni Wiwŏnhoe, 2009.Google Scholar
Chinsil-Hwahae Rŭl Wihan Kwagŏsa Chŏngni Wiwŏnhoe. 2006 nyŏn habangi chosa pogosŏ [Report of the 2nd half of Year 2006]. Seoul: Chinsil-Hwahae Rŭl Wihan Kwagŏsa Chŏngni Wiwŏnhoe, 2007.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Neil. “The Faces of Judicial Independence: Democratic versus Bureaucratic Accountability in Judicial Selection, Training, and Promotion in South Korea and Taiwan.” American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (2014): 893–949.Google Scholar
Cho, Kuk. “Transitional Justice in Korea: Legally Coping with Past Wrongs after Democratization.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 16, no. 3 (2007): 579–661.Google Scholar
Ch’oe, Chong-Ko. Hanguk ŭi pŏmnyulga [Jurists of Korea]. Seoul: Seoul Taehakkyo Ch’ulp’anbu, 2007.Google Scholar
Ch’oe, Chong-Ko. Hanguk ŭi pŏphakcha [Legal Scholars of Korea]. Seoul: Seoul Taehakkyo Ch’ulp’anbu, 1989.Google Scholar
Ch’oe, Chong-Ko. Sado pŏpkwan Kim Hong-Sŏp: Han pŏmnyulga ŭi sasang kwa sinang [Kim Hong-Sŏp, a Judge Apostle: A Jurist’s Thought and Faith]. Seoul: Yukpŏpsa, 1985.Google Scholar
Choi, Dai-Kwon. “Law and Social Change: The Korean Experience.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, 1976.Google Scholar
Chŏng, Chong-Sŏp. “Hanguk pŏpwŏn chedo ŭi pyŏnch’ŏn kwa kwaje” [The Evolution of the Korean Court System and Its Tasks]. Hŏnpŏphak yŏngu 4 (1998): 188–219.Google Scholar
Chŏng, Yag-Yong. Admonitions on Governing the People: Manual for All Administrators. Translated by Byonghyon Choi. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ch’ŏnjugyo Inkwŏn Wiwŏnhoe, ed. Sabŏp Sarin: 1975 nyŏn sawŏl ŭi haksal [Judicial Murder: The Massacre of April 1975]. Seoul: Ch’ŏnjugyo Inkwŏn Wiwŏnhoe, 2001.Google Scholar
Chōsen Kōtō Hōin Hanketsuroku [Chosŏn Kodŭng Pŏpwŏn Reports]. Seoul: Kōtō Hōin Shokika, 1908–1943.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jerome Alan, and Baker, Edward J.. “U.S. Foreign Policy and Human Rights in South Korea.” In Human Rights in Korea: Historical and Policy Perspectives, edited by Shaw, William, 172–219. Cambridge, MA: The East Asian Legal Studies Program of the Harvard Law School and the Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1991.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Robert. “Methods of Judicial Decision-Making and the Rule of Law: The Case of Apartheid South Africa.” Boston University International Law Journal 30 (2012): 497–527.Google Scholar
“Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, Year 1977.” Washington, DC: 95th Congress, 2nd session, February 3, 1978.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997.Google Scholar
Dewind, Adrian W., and Woodhouse, John. “Persecution of Defence Lawyers in South Korea: Report of a Mission to South Korea in May 1979.” New York: International Commission of Jurists, 1979.Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie. “Is Bad Law Still Law? Is Bad Law Really Law?” (October 6, 2008). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, no. 39/2008. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279599.Google Scholar
Dietze, Gottfried. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Norms? Constitutional Development in Postwar Germany.” Virginia Law Review 42, no. 1 (1956): 1–22.Google Scholar
Dominguez, Jorge I. “The Perfect Dictatorship? Comparing Authoritarian Rule in South Korea and in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico.” In The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea, edited by Kim, Byung-Kook and Vogel, Ezra F., 573–602. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems. South African Law in the Perspective of Legal Philosophy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David., ed. Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order?” Cardozo Law Review 27, no. 5 (2006): 2005–2040.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “‘With Benefit of Hindsight’: Dilemmas of Legality in the Fact of Injustice.” In Lethe’s Law: Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation, edited by Christodoulidis, Emilios and Veitch, Scott, 65–89. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001.Google Scholar
Edlin, Douglas E. Judges and Unjust Laws: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, James W. Jr. “Review of Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process by Robert M. Cover.” Washington University Law Quarterly 1975, no. 1 (1975): 265–274.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. “Natural Law: The Dilemmas of Judges Who Must Interpret Immoral Laws.” In Problems at the Roots of Law: Essays in Legal and Political Theory, 3–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 65 (2002): 41–68.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale. “Constitutional Adjudications: Lessons from Europe.” Texas Law Review 82 (2004): 1671–1704.Google Scholar
Ford, Christopher. “The Indigenization of Constitutionalism in the Japanese Experience.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 28, no. 1 (1996): 3–62.Google Scholar
Förster, Christian. “Review of Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History by Marie Seong-Hak Kim.” Journal of Japanese Law 20, no. 40 (2015): 299–302.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Translated by E. A. Shils, Edith Loewenstein, and Klaus Knorr. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 1941.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. Ernst Fraenkel Gesammelte Schriften. Bd 3, Neuaufbau der Demokratie in Deutschland und Korea. Edited by Göhler, Gerhard. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. Constitutional Reason of State: The Survival of the Constitutional Order. Providence, RI: Brown University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. 2nd rev. ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.” Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (1958): 630–672.Google Scholar
Garlicki, Lech. “Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5, no. 1 (2007): 44–68.Google Scholar
Gatmaytan, Dante B. “Can Constitutionalism Constrain Constitutional Change?” Northwestern Interdisciplinary Law Review 3, no. 1 (2010): 22–38.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999): 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. “The Constitutional Court and the Judicialization of Korean Politics.” In New Courts in Asia, edited by Harding, Andrew and Nicholson, Penelope, 145–157. New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. “Korea and the Reform of the Northeast Asian Legal Complex of Korean Law.” In The Spirit of Korean Law: Korean Legal History in Context, edited by Kim, Marie Seong-Hak, 233–260. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2016.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir, eds. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Simpser, Alberto, eds. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. “Partial Justice.” Commentary, August 1, 1994. https://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/partial-justice/.Google Scholar
Graver, Hans Petter. Judges against Justice: On Judges When the Rule of Law Is under Attack. Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, Hans Petter. “Judicial Independence under Authoritarian Rule: An Institutional Approach to the Legal Tradition of the West.” The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 10, no. 2 (2018): 317–339.Google Scholar
Graver, Hans Petter. “Why Adolf Hitler Spared the Judges: Judicial Opposition Against the Nazi State.” German Law Journal 19, no. 4 (2018): 845–877.Google Scholar
Greitens, Sheena Chestnut. Dictators and Their Secret Police: Coercive Institutions and State Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Guichard, Justine. Regime Transition and the Judicial Politics of Enmity: Democratic Inclusion and Exclusion in South Korean Constitutional Justice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark. “Beyond ‘Law vs. Politics’ in Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from South Korea.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10, no. 1 (2012): 6–34.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark, and Kim, Sung Ho. “Challenge and Change in East Asia: Constitutionalism on Trial in South Korea.” Journal of Democracy 16 (2005): 28–42.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark, and Kim, Sung Ho. Making We the People: Democratic Constitutional Founding in Postwar Japan and South Korea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark, and Kim, Sung Ho. “‘Stranger in a Strange Land’: Carl Schmitt’s Politics of Exception in South Korea.” In The European Mind: Narrative and Identity, edited by Frendo, Henry, 405–411. Msida: Malta University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark, and Kim, Sung Ho. “To Make ‘We the People’: Constitutional Founding in Postwar Japan and South Korea.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 8, no. 4 (2010): 800–848.Google Scholar
Haldemann, Frank. “Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law.” Ratio Juris 18 (2005): 162–178.Google Scholar
Haley, John O. “Constitutional Adjudication in Japan: Context, Structures, and Values.” Washington University Law Review 88 (2011): 1467–1491.Google Scholar
Haley, John O.. “Review of Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan by Ramseyer and Rasmusen.” Journal of Japanese Studies 30 (2004): 235–240.Google Scholar
Haley, John O.. The Spirit of Japanese Law. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. “The Fight for Basic Legal Freedoms: Mobilization by the Legal Complex.” In Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law, edited by Heckman, James J., Nelson, Robert L., and Cabatingan, Lee, 210–240. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., eds. “Introduction – The Legal Complex in Struggles for Political Liberalism.” In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, 1–40. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. The Federalist Papers. Edited by Rossiter, Clinton Lawrence. New York: New American Library of World Literature, 1961.Google Scholar
Han, Hong-Ku. Han Hong-Ku kyosu ka ssŭnŭn sabŏppu—hoehan kwa oyok ŭi yŏksa [Judicial History Written by Professor Han Hong-Ku: The History Filled with Regrets and Shame]. Hangyŏrye Sinmun. May 19, 2009–June 18, 2010. http://m.hani.co.kr/arti/SERIES/214/title1.html.Google Scholar
Han, In-Sŏp, ed. Chŏngŭi ŭi pŏp, yangsim ŭi pŏp, inkwŏn ŭi pŏp [Law as Justice, Law as Conscience, Law as Human Rights]. Seoul: Pagyŏngsa, 2004.Google Scholar
Han, In-Sŏp. “Hoehan kwa oyok ŭi kwagŏ rŭl paro chabŭryŏmyŏn: Sabŏppu ŭi kwagŏ ch’ŏngsan ŭl wihayŏ” [To Correct the Past Filled with Regrets and Shame: For the Cleansing of the Judiciary’s Past]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 46, no. 4 (2005): 84–120.Google Scholar
Han, In-Sŏp. “Hŏnpŏp kwa hyŏngsapŏp: kwŏllŏk chŏngch’i, chiptan kaltŭng kwa pŏp ŭi chibae” [The Constitution and Criminal Law: Politics of Power, Group Conflicts and Rule by Law]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 39, no. 4 (1999): 128–168.Google Scholar
Han, In-Sŏp. “Kukka pŏngnyŏk e taehan pŏpchŏk ch’aegim mit p’ihae hoebok: 5.18 minjuhwa undong ŭi pŏpchŏk haegyŏl ŭl chungsim ŭro” [Legal Liability and the Recovery of Damages for State Violence: Legal Solutions for the 5.18 Democracy Movement]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 43 (2002): 187–237.Google Scholar
Han, In-Sŏp. “Ryu Kŭn-Il ŭi sunan (1)” [Yu Kŭn-Il’s Ordeal (1)]. Minju sahoe rŭl wihan pyŏllon 85 (2009): 84–93.Google Scholar
Han Sŭng-Hŏn Pyŏnhosa Pyŏllon Sakŏn Sillok Kanhaeng Wiwŏnhoe, ed. Han Sŭng-Hŏn pyŏnhosa pyŏllon sakŏn sillok [The Truthful Record of the Defense Cases of Attorney Han Sŭng-Hŏn]. 7 vols. Seoul: Pŏmusa, 2006.Google Scholar
Hanguk Pŏpche Yŏnguhoe, ed. Mi kunjŏng pŏmnyŏng ch’ongnam: Yŏngmunp’an. [The Complete Collection of the Laws and Regulations of the U.S. Military Government: English Edition]. Seoul: Hanguk Pŏpche Yŏnguhoe, 1971.Google Scholar
Hanley, Paul. “Transitional Justice in South Korea: One Country’s Restless Search for Truth and Reconciliation.” University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review 9 (2014): 138–166.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. London: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (1958): 593–629.Google Scholar
Hauriou, André. Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques. Paris: Montchrestien, 1983.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Rosenbluth, Frances. “Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (2009): 345–366.Google Scholar
Herdegen, Matthias J. “Unjust Laws, Human Rights, and the German Constitution: Germany’s Recent Confrontation with the Past.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 32, no. 3 (1995): 591–606.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Carolina G. “Constitutional Authoritarianism and the Prospects of Democracy in the Philippines.” Journal of International Affairs 2 (1985): 243–258.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. “Agents of Anti-Politics: Courts in Pinochet’s Chile.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 102–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. Judges Beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hŏ, Il-T’ae. “Inhyŏktang Chaegŏnwi sakŏn kwa sapŏp sarin” [The Inhyŏktang Restoration Committee Case and Judicial Murder]. Tonga pŏphak 40 (2007): 105–125.Google Scholar
Hŏ, Il-T’ae. “Pŏp waegok haengwi wa sabŏp sarin ŭi pangji rŭl wihan ippŏp chŏngch’aek” [Legislative policy for the Prevention of the Distortion of Law and Judicial Murder]. Hyŏngsa chŏngch’aek yŏngu 18 (2007): 5–48.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. “Lineages of the Rule of Law.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam, 19–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hong, Sŏng-U. Inkwŏn pyŏllon han sidae: Hong Sŏng-U pyŏnhosa ŭi chŭngŏn [An Era of Human Rights Defense: Testimony of Attorney Hong Song-U]. Edited by Han, In-Sŏp. Seoul: Kyŏngin Munhwasa, 2011.Google Scholar
Hong, Sŏng-U, and Han, In-Sŏp, eds. Inkwŏn pyŏllon charyo chip (1970 nyŏn dae) [Collection of Sources for Defense of Human Rights (The 1970s)]. 6 vols. Seoul: Kyŏngin Munhwasa, 2012.Google Scholar
Hwang, In-Ch’ŏl. “Kang Sin-Ok sakŏn ŭi kyŏnggwa” [The Unfolding of the Kang Sin-Ok Case]. In Chŏngŭi ŭi pŏp, yangsim ŭi pŏp, inkwŏn ŭi pŏp, edited by Han, In-Sŏp, 259–272. Seoul: Pagyŏngsa, 2004.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Constitutional Identity.” The Review of Politics 68, no. 3 (2006): 361–397.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “An Unconstitutional Constitution? A Comparative Perspective.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 4, no. 3 (2006): 460–487.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, Kanishka. “The Exception Becomes the Norm: Law and Regimes of Exception in East Asia.” Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 2, no. 1 (2001): 108–124.Google Scholar
Kalhan, Anil. “‘Gray Zone’ Constitutionalism and the Dilemma of Judicial Independence in Pakistan.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 46, no. 1 (2013): 1–96.Google Scholar
Kang, Chŏng-In. Hanguk hyŏndae chŏngch’i sasang kwa Park Chung Hee [Contemporary Korean Political Thought and Park Chung Hee]. Seoul: Ak’anet, 2014.Google Scholar
Kang, Pyŏng-Yong. “Kukka paesang chedo e kwanhan yŏngu: Kukka paesangpŏp che 2 cho rŭl chungsim ŭro” [A Study on the State Liability Compensation System: Focusing on Article 2 of the State Tort Claims Act]. Master’s thesis, Yonsei University, 2002.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, Silverstein, Gordon, and Kagan, Robert A.. Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S. “Judicial Independences.” Georgetown Law Journal 95, no. 4 (2007): 1041–1059.Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S.. “Two Concepts of Judicial Independence.” Southern California Law Review 72, no. 2–3 (1999): 535–558.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Translated by Paulson, B. L. and Paulson, S. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. “Law, State and Justice in the Pure Theory of Law.” Yale Law Journal 57, no. 3 (1948): 377–390.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law, 2nd ed. Translated by Max Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Ellen. Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook, and Vogel, Ezra F., eds. The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ang-Rok. “Odaka Tomoo ŭi pŏp sasang” [Odaka Tomō’s Legal Thought]. Pŏpsahak yŏngu 46 (2012): 433–458.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “Chayu kwŏn chŏk kibon kwŏn e kwanhan p’allye ŭi kyŏnghyang” [Jurisprudential Tendency regarding the Right to Liberty as a Fundamental Right]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 11, no. 2 (1970): 82–139.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “Ch’ŏnggu kwŏn chŏk kibon kwŏn e kwanhan p’allye ŭi kyŏnghyang” [Jurisprudential Tendency regarding the Right to Make a Claim as a Fundamental Right]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 12, no. 2 (1972): 93–128.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. Hanguk hŏnpŏp sa [Korean Constitutional History]. Seoul: Seoul Taehakkyo Ch’ulp’anbu, 1988.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “Hanguk ippŏp e taehan t’ongje” [Control of Legislation in Korea]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 25, no. 4 (1984): 125–155.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “Hŏnpŏp kwa Taebŏpwŏn ŭi kwangye: pigyopŏp jŏk kŏmt’o” [The Relationship between the Constitution and the Supreme Court: A Comparative Examination]. Hŏnpŏp Nonch’ong 19 (2008): 57–85.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “Hŏnpŏp chejŏng kwa ku pŏmnyŏng ŭi hyoryŏk: pyŏnho kwŏn kwa pŏpchŏng moyok” [Constitutional Enactment and the Legal Force of Old Laws and Regulations: The Rights of the Counsel and the Contempt of Court]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 29, no. 1 (1988): 164–192.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. Hŏnpŏphak kaeron [An Introduction to the Study of the Constitution]. Seoul: Pŏmmunsa, 1973.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “Kingŭp choch’i kwŏn” [Emergency Decree Power]. Kosigye (October 1973): 12–23.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “Kingŭp choch’i kwŏn” [Emergency Decree Power]. Kosigye (January 1979): 54–70.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “Minjujŏk kibon chilsŏ” [Basic Democratic Order]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 20, no. 1 (1979): 99–113.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. “T’ongch’i kujo e kwanhan hŏnpŏp p’allye ŭi kyŏnghyang” [Jurisprudential Tendency regarding the Constitution as a Governing Structure]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 14, no. 1 (1973): 95–123.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su. Wihŏn pŏmnyul simsa chedo ron [A Theory of the Constitutional Review System]. Seoul: Hagyŏnsa, 1983.Google Scholar
Kim, Ch’ŏl-Su, and Sang, Don Lee. “The Influence of US Constitutional Law Doctrines in Korea.” In Constitutional Systems in Late Twentieth Century Asia, edited by Beer, Lawrence Ward, 303–330. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyung-A, and Sorensen, Clark W., eds. Reassessing the Park Chung Hee Era, 1961–1979: Development, Political Thought, Democracy, and Cultural Influence. Seattle: Center for Korean Studies, University of Washington Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongcheol. “Courts in the Republic of Korea: Featuring a Built-in Authoritarian Legacy of Centralization and Bureaucratization.” In Asian Courts in Context, edited by Yeh, Jiunn-rong and Chang, Wen-Chen, 112–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongcheol. “Hŏnpŏp Chaep’anso kusŏng pangbŏp ŭi kaehyŏngnon” [A Proposal for Reform of the Composition of the Constitutional Court]. Hŏnpŏphak yŏngu 11, no. 2 (2005): 9–48.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongcheol. “Some Problems with the Korean Constitutional Adjudication System.” Journal of Korean Law 1, no. 2 (2001): 17–36.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongcheol. “The Structure and Basic Principles of Constitutional Adjudication in the Republic of Korea.” In Litigation in Korea, edited by Cho, Kuk, 115–134. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
Kim, Kang-Un. “Hanguk e issŏsŏ wihŏn pŏmnyul simsa ŭi silch’e: p’allye rŭl chungsim ŭro” [The Substance of Judicial Review in Korea: Focusing on Precedent]. Pŏphak yŏngu (Wŏngwang Taehakkyo College of Law) 12 (1992): 363–384.Google Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. “Colonial Jurisprudence and the Construction of Customary Law in Korea.” American Journal of Comparative Law 57, no. 1 (2009): 205–247.Google Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. “Constitutional Jurisprudence and the Rule of Law in Korea: Revisiting the Courts in Yusin Korea (1972–1980).” The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 5, no. 2 (2013): 178–203.Google Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. “In the Name of Custom, Culture, and the Constitution: Korean Customary Law in Flux.” Texas International Law Journal 48, no. 3 (2013): 357–391.Google Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak, ed. The Spirit of Korean Law: Korean Legal History in Context. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2016.Google Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. “Travails of Judges: Courts and Constitutional Authoritarianism in South Korea.” American Journal of Comparative Law 63, no. 3 (2015): 601–654.Google Scholar
Kim, Nyŏng. “Yusin sidae Myŏngdong Sŏngdang esŏ ŭi minjuhwa undong” [Democracy Movements at Myŏngdong Cathedral during the Yusin Period]. Kat’olik sahoe kwahak yŏngu 10 (1999): 57–80.Google Scholar
Kim, Sŏng-Su. “Kingŭp choch’i wihŏn simsakwŏn e taehan kwangyŏn: Taebŏpwŏn p’angyŏl (2010.12.16., sŏngo 2010To5986) e taehan p’yŏngka rŭl chungsim ŭro” [An Observation on the Power to Review the Emergency Decrees: Assessment of the Supreme Court Decision (December 16, 2010, 2010To5986)]. Kongpŏphak yŏngu 12 (2011): 315–336.Google Scholar
Kim, Sŏn-T’aek. “Wihŏn chŏk hŏnpŏp kaejŏng e taehan wihŏn simsaron: Yusin hŏnpŏp ŭi kyŏngu” [Study on the Constitutional Review of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Case of the Yusin Constitution]. Kongpŏphak yŏngu 12 (2011): 165–200.Google Scholar
Kim, Sŭng-Il. “3–1 tongnip undong chŏnhu Ssun Wŏn ŭi Hanguk insik yŏngu [A Study on Sun Yat-sen’s Opinion of Korea Before and After the March First Independence Movement].” Hanguk tongnip undongsa yŏngu 37 (2010): 101–128.Google Scholar
Kim, To-Kyun. “Hanguk pŏp ch’egye esŏ chayŏnpŏp ron ŭi hyŏngsŏng kwa palchŏn” [The Formation and Development of Natural Law Theory in the Korean Legal System]. Pŏp ch’ŏrak yŏngu 11 (2008): 183–226.Google Scholar
Kim, Un-Yong. “Hanguk Hŏnpŏp Wiwŏnhoe ŭi sabŏp chŏk sŏngkyŏk” [The Judicial Nature of the Constitutional Committee of Korea]. Pŏmnyul haengjŏng nonjip 19 (1978): 19–45.Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-Jick. “The Security, Political, and Human Rights Conundrum, 1974–1979.” In The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea, edited by Kim, Byung-Kook and Vogel, Ezra F., 457–482. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kim, Young C. “Politics of Emergency Powers: The Case of Korea.” In Coping with Crises: How Governments Deal with Emergencies, edited by Leng, Shao-Chuan, 122–179. Miller Center Series on Asian Political Leadership, vol. 2. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1990.Google Scholar
Kitamura, Ichiro. “The Judiciary in Contemporary Society: Japan.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 25, no. 2 (1993): 263–291.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P. Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kukka, Chŏngbowŏn. Kwagŏ wa taehwa, mirae ŭi sŏngch’al [Dialogue with the Past, Reflection on the Future], vol. 4 (Judiciary). Seoul: Kukka Chŏngbowŏn, 2007.Google Scholar
Kŭm, Hyo-Chŏn. “Hanguk hŏnpŏp II: Kwŏnwi chuŭi hŏnpŏp ŭi sŏngnip kwa punggoe” [The Korean Constitution II: The Making of the Authoritarian Constitution and Its Demise]. Kongpŏp yŏngu 17 (1989): 91–111.Google Scholar
“Kŭndaehwa int’eligench’ia ron kwa chisigin ŭi pyŏnjŏl nonjaeng” [The Modernization Theory of the Intelligentsia and Controversy over the Intellectuals’ Defection]. Chugan Tong-A, October 19, 2015.Google Scholar
Kwon, Youngjoon. “Korea: Bridging the Gap between Korean Substance and Western Form.” In Law and Legal Institutions of Asia: Traditions, Adaptations and Innovations, edited by Black, E. Ann and Bell, Gary F., 151–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Law, David S., and Versteeg, Mila. “Constitutional Variation among Strains of Authoritarianism.” In Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Simpser, Alberto, 165–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Lee, Namhee. The Making of Minjung: Democracy and the Politics of Representation in South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Lee, Young Jae. “Law, Politics, and Impeachment: The Impeachment of Roh Moo-hyun from a Comparative Constitutional Perspective.” American Journal of Comparative Law 53 (2005): 403–432.Google Scholar
Leng, Shao-Chuan, ed. Coping with Crises: How Governments Deal with Emergencies. The Miller Center Series on Asian Political Leadership, vol. 2. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1990.Google Scholar
Lindseth, Peter L. “The Paradox of Parliamentary Supremacy: Delegation, Democracy, and Dictatorship in Germany and France, 1920s–1950s.” Yale Law Journal 113 (2004): 1341–1415.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. “The Concept of Constituent Power.” European Journal of Political Theory 13, no. 2 (2013): 218–237.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. “The Rule of Law in European Jurisprudence.” Strasbourg: European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), May 29, 2009. CDL-DEM(2009)006.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. Sword and Scales: An Examination of the Relationship between Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar
Lummis, Charles Douglas. “Korea: The Trial of a Revolutionary Prophet.” New York Review of Books, April 28, 1977.Google Scholar
MacCormack, Geoffrey. The Spirit of Traditional Chinese Law. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Matsuo, Keiichi. “Odaka hō tetsugaku no keisei” [The Formation of Odaka’s Legal Philosophy]. Kōbe hōgaku zasshi 15, no. 1 (1965): 1–47.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Padraig. “Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law: The Perfect Couple or Awkward Bedfellows?” The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 2, no. 2 (2010): 127–154.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. “The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers.” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 10 (1997): 163–176.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. The Legacies of Law: Long-Run Consequences of Legal Development in South Africa, 1650–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry, and Rogelio, Pérez Perdomo. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. 3rd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Min, Pok-Ki. Na ŭi pŏpkwan sijŏl [My Times as a Judge]. Pŏmnyul Sinmun, August 17, 1981–May 10, 1982.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. “Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10 (2014): 281–299.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Müller, Ingo. Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich. Translated by Deborah Lucas Schneider. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mun, Chun-Yŏng. Pŏpwŏn kwa kŏmch’al ŭi t’ansaeng: sabŏp ŭi yŏksa ro ingnŭn Taehanminguk [The Birth of the Courts and the Prosecutor’s Office: The Republic of Korea as Seen in the History of the Judiciary]. Seoul: Yŏksa Pip’yŏngsa, 2010.Google Scholar
Mun, Hyŏng-Rae. “Pŏp e naejae toen chŏngch’i wa p’ongnyŏk e kwanhan yŏngu: Yusin ch’eje hyŏngsŏng kwa Inhyŏktang Chaegŏnwi sagŏn ŭl chungsim ŭro” [A Study on Control and Violence Embedded in Law: Focusing on the Establishment of the Yusin System and the Inhyŏktang Chaegŏnwi Case]. Master’s thesis, Sŏnggonghoe University, 2009.Google Scholar
Myŏng, Sun-Ku. “Ajikto sara innŭn pŏp, ‘Chosŏn Minsaryŏng’: Chosŏn Minsaryŏn ŭi sogŭpchŏk p’yeji rŭl chean handa” [The Law that Is Still Alive, “Chosŏn Minsaryŏng”: Calling for the Retroactive Abolition of Chosŏn Minsaryŏng]. Chŏsŭtisŭ 103 (2008): 220–236.Google Scholar
Nam, Pok-Hyŏn. “Hŏnpŏp Chaep’anso wa Taebŏpwŏn ŭi kwanhal munche” [Problems of Jurisdictional Division between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court]. Hanguk kongpŏp hakhoe 32, no. 1 (2003): 133–206.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C.. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R.. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49, no. 4 (1989): 803–832.Google Scholar
O, Se-Hyŏk. “Hanguk esŏ ŭi pŏmnyŏng haesŏk” [Interpretation of Laws and Regulations in Korea]. Pŏp chŏrak yŏngu 6, no. 2 (2003): 119–150.Google Scholar
Oberdorfer, Don, and Carlin, Robert. The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History. 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books, 2014.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Rory. “Guardians of the Constitution: Unconstitutional Constitutional Norms.” Journal of Civil Liberties 4 (1999): 46–73.Google Scholar
Ŏm, Min-Yŏng. “Ŏllon ch’ulp’an ŭi chayu wa haengjŏng chŏk chaeryang” [Freedom of the Press and Administrative Discretion]. P’allye yŏngu 1, no. 3 (1959): 464–494.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark J. “Dialogue with Dictators: Judicial Resistance in Argentina and Brazil.” Law and Social Inquiry 20, no. 2 (1995): 481–560.Google Scholar
Pak, Ch’an-Chu. “Wihŏn kyŏlchŏng kwa sogŭp hyo” [Unconstitutionality Decision and Retroactivity]. Seoul pŏphak 19 (2011): 1–47.Google Scholar
Pak, Chi-Hyang et al. Haebang chŏnhusa ŭi chae insik [Reconsidering the History before and after Liberation]. 2 vols. Seoul: Ch’aeksesang, 2006.Google Scholar
Pak, Chi-U. “Hyŏngbŏl chohang e kwanhan wihŏn kyŏlchŏng ŭi sogŭp hyo e taehan pip’anjŏk koch’al” [A Critical Examination on the Retroactivity of Unconstitutionality Decisions]. Segye hŏnpŏp yŏngu 17 (2011): 405–432.Google Scholar
Pak, Hong-Kyu. “Inhyŏktang chaegŏn tanch’e sakŏn kwa pŏp” [The Inhyoktang Restoration Group Case and Law]. In Sabŏp Sarin: 1975 nyŏn sawŏl ŭi haksal, edited by Ch’ŏnjugyo Inkwŏn Wiwŏnhoe, 235–236. Seoul: Ch’ŏnjugyo Inkwŏn Wiwŏnhoe, 2001.Google Scholar
Pak, U-Tong. P’ansa sil esŏ pŏpchŏng kkaji [From Judicial Chamber to Courtroom]. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hanguk Sabŏp Haengjŏng Hakhoe, 2000.Google Scholar
Pak, U-Tong. “Taebŏpwŏn chŏnwŏn habŭi ch’e chaep’an e issŏsŏ ŭi ŭigyŏn ŭi p’yosi” [Expression of Opinion in the Supreme Court En Banc Decisions]. In Sasilsim kwa pŏmnyulsim, 680–707. Seoul: Hanguk Sapŏp Haengjŏng Hakhoe, 1994.Google Scholar
Pak, U-Tong. “Tangsaja wa p’igoin ŭi irŭm ŭl kamch’un p’angyŏl” [Court Opinions in Which the Names of the Parties and the Defendants Are Omitted]. Pŏmnyul Sinmun, January 21, 2010.Google Scholar
Pak, U-Tong. “Taepŏpwŏn p’angyŏl i ch’wiso toen sakŏn” [A Case That Voided the Judgment by the Supreme Court]. In Pyŏnhosa sil anp’ak, 403–415. Seoul: Hanguk Sabŏp Chŏngch’aek Hakhoe, 2010.Google Scholar
Pak, Ŭn-Chŏng. “Hanguk pŏp ch’ŏrak ŭi pansŏng kwa kwaje” [Reflections and the Tasks of Korean Legal Philosophy]. Pŏp kwa sahoe 10 (1994): 189–223.Google Scholar
Pang, Sun-Wŏn. Na ŭi kil, na ŭi sŏnt’aek, pŏpcho panbaengnyŏn [My Way, My Choice, a Half-Century in the Judiciary]. Seoul: Hanguk Sabŏp Haengjŏng Hakhoe, 1994.Google Scholar
Pangalangan, Raul C. “Political Emergencies in the Philippines: Changing Labels and the Unchanging Need for Legitimacy.” In Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality, edited by Ramraj, Victor V. and Thiruvengadam, Arun K., 412–435. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pangalangan, Raul C.. “Human Rights Discourse in Post-Marcos Philippines.” In Human Rights in Asia, edited by Davis, Thomas W. D. and Galligan, Brian, 56–69. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
“Park: Survival Is at Stake.” Time, June 30, 1975.Google Scholar
Park Chung Hee Taet’ongnyŏng yŏnsŏlmun chip [Collection of Speeches by President Park Chung Hee]. Seoul: Taet’ongnyŏng Pisŏsil, 1973.Google Scholar
Park, Yong Chul. “Does It Matter Who Wrote It?: The Admissibility of Suspect Interrogation Record Written by Prosecutors in Korea.” Journal of Korean Law 6, no. 2 (2007): 180–190.Google Scholar
Parlett, William. “The Dangers of Constitution-Making.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 38 (2012): 193–238.Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony W. Political (in)Justice: Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Sinmunsa, Pŏmnyul. Pŏpcho 50 nyŏn yasa [Unofficial History of the 50 Years of the Judiciary]. 2 vols. Seoul: Pŏmnyul Sinmunsa, 2002.Google Scholar
Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ, Hanguk pŏpkwansa [History of Judges in Korea]. Seoul: Yukpŏpsa, 1981.Google Scholar
Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ. Pŏpwŏnsa [History of the Courts]. 2 vols. Seoul: Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ, 1995.Google Scholar
Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ. Sabŏp yŏngam [Judiciary Yearbook]. Seoul: Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ, 1975–2005.Google Scholar
Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ. Sosong ch’okchin tŭng e kwanhan tŭngnyepŏp sihaeng kyŏlgwa ŭi punsŏk [Analysis of the Results of the Implementation of the Act on Special Cases to Expedite Litigation and Related Matters]. Seoul: Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ, 1987.Google Scholar
Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ. T’onggye yŏnbo [Statistics Yearbook]. Seoul: Pŏpwŏn Haengjŏngch’ŏ, 1964–1974.Google Scholar
Presidential Truth Commission on Suspicious Deaths of the Republic of Korea. A Hard Journey to Justice: First Term Report by the Presidential Truth Commission on Suspicious Deaths of the Republic of Korea. Seoul: Samin Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Pyŏn, Chŏng-Su. Pŏpcho yŏjŏng [Reminiscences of a Traveler in the Judiciary]. Seoul: Kwanak Sa, 1997.Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. “Gesetzliches Unrecht und übergesetzliches Recht.” Süddeutsche Juristen-Zeitung 1 (1946): 105–108.Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. “Legal Philosophy.” In The Legal Philosophy of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin, edited by Wilk, Kurt, vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Rajah, Jothie. Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislation, Discourse, and Legitimacy in Singapore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ramraj, Victor V., and Thiruvengadam, Arun K., eds. Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rasmusen, Eric B.. Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, 2nd ed., 210–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Reimann, Mathias. “National Socialist Jurisprudence and Academic Continuity: A Comment on Professor Kaufmann’s Article.” Cardozo Law Review 9 (1988): 1657–1658.Google Scholar
Rommen, Heinrich. “Natural Law in Decisions of the Federal Supreme Court and of the Constitutional Courts in Germany.” Natural Law Forum 4 (1959): 1–25.Google Scholar
Rossitor, Clinton. Constitutional Dictatorship: Crisis Government in the Modern Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Roznai, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Roznai, Yaniv. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea.” American Journal of Comparative Law 61 (2013): 657–719.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter H., and O’Brien, David, eds. Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia, 2001.Google Scholar
Ryu, Youngju. Writers of the Winter Republic: Literature and Resistance in Park Chung Hee’s Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Sabŏpsa P’yŏnch’an Wiwŏnhoe. Yŏksa sogŭi sabŏppu [The Judiciary in History]. Seoul: Sabŏp Palchŏn Chaedan, 2009.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. “Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion.” American Political Science Review 56, no. 4 (1962): 853–864.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. “Amending the Presuppositions of a Constitution.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford, 145–162. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. “Aspirational and Aversive Constitutionalism: The Case for Studying Cross-Constitutional Influence through Negative Models.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1, no. 2 (2003): 296–324.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. “Law in a Time of Emergency: States of Exception and the Temptations of 9/11.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 6, no. 5 (2004): 1001–1084.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. Carl Schmitt: The End of Law. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Translated by Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy. Translated by Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Shaw, William R. “Introduction.” In Human Rights in Korea: Historical and Policy Perspectives, edited by Shaw, William R., 1–22. Cambridge, MA: The East Asian Legal Studies Program of the Harvard Law School and The Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1991.Google Scholar
Shaw, William R.. Legal Norms in a Confucian State. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California Berkeley, Center for Korean Studies, 1981.Google Scholar
Shaw, William R.. “Traditional Korean Law and Its Relation to China.” In Essays on China’s Legal Tradition, edited by Cohen, Jerome A., Edwards, R. Randle, and Chen, Fu-mei Chang, 302–326. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Shin, Gi-Wook, and Hwang, Kyung Moon. Contentious Kwangju: The May 18 Uprising in Korea’s Past and Present. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. “Singapore: The Exception That Proves Rules Matter.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 73–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Sim, Hŏn-Sŏp. “Sŏk-U Hwang San-Tŏk paksa e issŏsŏ ŭi chayŏnpŏp ron kwa pŏp silchŭng juŭi” [Natural Law Theory and Positivist Legal Ideology of Dr. Hwang San-Tŏk]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 35 (1994): 72–80.Google Scholar
Sin, Tong-Un. “Hanguk kŏmch’al chedo ŭi hyŏnhwang kwa kaesŏn ch’aek” [The Current State and the Reform Measures of the Prosecution System in Korea]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 29, no. 2 (1988): 39–58.Google Scholar
Sin, Tong-Un. P’allye paeksŏn hyŏngpŏp kakron 1 [One Hundred Selected Judicial Decisions in Criminal Law Provisions I]. Seoul: Kyŏngsewŏn, 1999.Google Scholar
Chung-Sŏk, Sŏ. “Ch’ŏnjugyo Chŏngŭi Kuhyŏn Chŏnguk Sajedan ŭi ch’ulbŏm paegyŏng kwa hwaltong” [The Background of the Rise and the Activities of the Catholic Priests Association for Justice]. Sarim (Sŏngdae sarim) 27 (2007): 223–248.Google Scholar
Hi-Sŏk, Sŏ. “Hanguk minpŏp e taehan Ilbon minpŏp ŭi yŏnghyang kwa hyanghu ŭi kwangye: pigyo pŏp ŭi yŏngu taesang ŭro sŏŭi Ilbon minpŏp ŭl wihayŏ” [The Influence of Japanese Civil Law on Korean Civil Law and the Future of Their Relationship: Japanese Civil Law as a Subject of Comparative Law]. Minsa pŏphak 52 (2010): 101–156.Google Scholar
Sohn, Hak-Kyu. Authoritarianism and Opposition in South Korea. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Song, Kŏn-Ho et al. Haebang chŏnhusa ŭi insik [Understanding the History before and after Liberation]. 6 vols. Seoul: Hangilsa, 1979–1989.Google Scholar
Song, Sang-Hyŏn. “Taebŏpwŏn ŭi kinŭng kwa sosong ch’okchin dŭng e kwanhan t’ŭngnyepŏp sang ŭi munjechŏm” [Functions of the Supreme Court and Problems regarding the Act on Special Cases to Expedite Litigation and Related Matters]. Sabŏp haengjŏng 23, no. 2 (1982): 14–19, 65.Google Scholar
Stolleis, Michael. The Law under the Swastika: Studies on Legal History in Nazi Germany. Translated by Thomas Dunlap. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Taegŏmch’alch’ŏng. Kŏmch’al yŏngam [Prosecution Yearbook]. Seoul: Taegŏmch’alch’ŏng, 1986.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. “Good Casuistry and Bad Casuistry: Resolving the Dilemmas Faced by Catholic Judges.” University of St. Thomas Law Journal 4, no. 2 (2006): 269–279.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z.. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Haynie, Stacia L.. “Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts: A Time Series Analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961–1987.” Law & Society Review 27 (1993): 707–740.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. “Transitional Jurisprudence: The Role of Law in Political Transformation.” Yale Law Journal 106, no. 7 (1997): 2009–2082.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Activities of the Past Three Years. Seoul: Truth and Reconciliation Commission, 2009.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Parliament and Government in a Reconstructed Germany (1917).” In Max Weber: Economy and Society, edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus, vol. 2: 1451–1459. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
West, James M., and Baker, Edward J.. “The 1987 Constitutional Reforms in South Korea: Electoral Processes and Judicial Independence.” In Human Rights in Korea: Historical and Policy Perspectives, edited by Shaw, William, 222–252. Cambridge, MA: The East Asian Legal Studies Program of the Harvard Law School and the Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1991.Google Scholar
Wright, R. George. “Could a Constitutional Amendment Be Unconstitutional?” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 22, no. 4 (1991): 741–764.Google Scholar
Yang, Kŏn. “Hanguk hŏnpŏp III: Che 4 konghwaguk mit che 5 konghwaguk hŏnpŏpsa ŭi kaekwan (1972–1988)” [The Constitutional Law of Korea III: A Survey of the Constitutional History of the Fourth and the Fifth Republics]. Kongpŏp yŏngu 17 (1989): 113–141.Google Scholar
Yang, Pyŏng-Ho. Pŏpcho pan paengnyŏn e irŭn na ŭi sosin [My Beliefs during a Half-Century in the Judicary]. Seoul: Kyŏngch’on Aein, 1995.Google Scholar
Yang, Sam-Sŭng. “Pŏpcho kaejoron: Pŏpcho samryun ŭi paramjikhan mosŭp kwa irŭl wihan pangan” [A Theory of Judicial Reform: The Ideal Image of the Three Wheels of the Judiciary and Measures for Its Achievement]. Chŏsŭt’isŭ 118 (2010): 5–56.Google Scholar
Yi, Ch’ang-Sŏk. “Ku pŏmnyŏng ŭi wihŏn simsakwŏn” [The Power to Review the Constitutionality of Old Laws and Regulations]. Pŏpche wŏlbo 2, no. 11 (November 1959): n.p.Google Scholar
Yi, Hoe-Ch’ang. “Sapŏp ŭi chŏkkŭk chuŭi: t’ŭkhi kibonkwŏn pojang kinŭng kwa kwallŏn hayŏ” [Judicial Activism: Focusing on Its Function of Protecting Fundamental Rights]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 28, no. 2 (1987): 147–161.Google Scholar
Yi, Hoe-Ch’ang. Yi Hoe-Ch’ang Hoegorok [Yi Hoe-Ch’ang Memoirs]. 2 vols. Seoul: Kimyŏngsa, 2017.Google Scholar
Yi, Hŏn-Hwan. “Chŏngch’i kwajŏng e issŏsŏ ŭi sabŏpkwŏn e taehan yŏngu: Hanguk hŏnjŏngsa rŭl chungsim ŭro” [A Study on Judicial Power in the Political Process: Focusing on Korean Constitutional History]. PhD diss., Seoul National University, 1996.Google Scholar
Yi, Kwang-Wŏn. “Wisuryŏng ŭi haesŏk kwa ippŏp panghyang” [Interpretation of Garrison Decrees and Legislative Directions]. Pŏphak nonch’ong 24, no. 1 (2011): 231–260.Google Scholar
Yi, Kyŏng-Ho. “Kunjŏng pŏmnyŏng ŭi wihŏn simsakwŏn ŭn pŏpwŏn e ittanŭn p’allye” [The Decision that the Power to Review the Military Government Laws and Regulations Resides with the Courts]. Seoul Taehakkyo pŏphak 1, no. 2 (1959): 441–455.Google Scholar
Yi, Sang-Ch’ŏl. “Kukka Paesangpŏp che 2 cho 1 hang tansŏ ŭi wihŏnsŏng” [The Unconstitutionality of Section 2 Proviso of the State Tort Claims Act]. Anam pŏphak 1 (1993): 259–280.Google Scholar
Yi, Sŭng-Il. Ch’ongdokpu pŏpche chŏngch’aek: Ilche ŭi singmin t’ongch’i wa Chosŏn Minsaryŏng [A Study on the Legal Policy of the Chosŏn Government General: Colonial Rule by Imperial Japan and Chosŏn Minsaryŏng]. Seoul: Yŏksa Pip’yŏngsa, 2008.Google Scholar
Yi, Tŏk-In. “Sahyŏng p’yeji ŭi chŏngdangsŏng: Sabŏp sarin kwa op’an e ŭihan sahyŏng” [Justification for the Abolition of the Death Penalty: Judicial Murder and the Death Penalty Resulting from Wrongful Conviction]. Chung-Ang pŏphak 12 (2010): 111–140.Google Scholar
Yi, Yŏng-Rok. “Che 1 konghwaguk Hŏnpŏp Wiwŏnhoe chedo ŭi hyŏngsŏng” [The Formation of the Constitutional Committee System during the First Republic]. Hŏnpŏphak yŏngu 11, no. 2 (2005): 307–336.Google Scholar
Yoon, Dae-Kyu. “Constitutional Amendment in Korea.” Korean Journal of Comparative Law 16 (1998): 1–13.Google Scholar
Yoon, Dae-Kyu. “Judicial Review in the Korean Political Context.” Korean Journal of Comparative Law 17 (1989): 133–178.Google Scholar
Yoon, Dae-Kyu. Law and Political Authority in South Korea. Boulder and Seoul: Westview and Kyungnam University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Youm, Kyu Ho. “Judicial Interpretation of Press Freedom in South Korea.” Boston College Third World Law Journal 7 (1987): 133–159.Google Scholar
Yu, Chin-O. Hŏnpŏp haeŭi [Interpretive Exposition of the Constitution]. Seoul: Myŏngsedang, 1949.Google Scholar
Yu, Chin-O. Hŏnpŏp kich’o hoegorok [Reminiscences on the Making of Constitutional Law]. Seoul: Ilchogak, 1980.Google Scholar
Yu, Pyŏng-Chin. Chaep’angwan ŭi komin: Yu Pyŏng-Chin pŏmnyul nonjip [The Dilemmas of a Judge: A Collection of the Legal Writings of Yu Pyŏng-Chin]. Edited by Sin Tong-Un. Seoul: Pŏmmunsa, 2008.Google Scholar
Yun, Chin-Su. “Wihŏn in taet’ŏngnyŏng ŭi kingŭp choch’i palryŏng i pulpŏp hangwi rŭl kusŏng hanŭnji yŏbu: Taebŏpwŏn 2015. 3. 26. Sŏngo 2012Ta48824 p’angyŏl” [Whether the Issuance of the Presidential Emergency Decree Which Has Been Found Unconstitutional Creates Tort Liability: The Supreme Court 2012Ta48824, March 26, 2015]. Minsa pŏphak 81 (2017): 93–154.Google Scholar