Book contents
- Conducting Research on Global Environmental Agreement-Making
- Series page
- Conducting Research on Global Environmental Agreement-Making
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures, Tables and Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Developing a Methodology
- Part II Navigating Sites
- 6 Negotiations
- 7 Beyond Negotiations
- Part III Collecting and Analysing Data
- Part IV Implementing and Adapting
- Index
- References
7 - Beyond Negotiations
Studying Side Events, Exhibition Booths, and Other Neglected Conference Spaces
from Part II - Navigating Sites
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 August 2023
Book contents
- Conducting Research on Global Environmental Agreement-Making
- Series page
- Conducting Research on Global Environmental Agreement-Making
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures, Tables and Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Developing a Methodology
- Part II Navigating Sites
- 6 Negotiations
- 7 Beyond Negotiations
- Part III Collecting and Analysing Data
- Part IV Implementing and Adapting
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter is a practical guide for navigating international environmental conferences, focusing on what there is to these events beyond the negotiations. It sensitizes readers to the existence and specificities of conference spaces and practices such as side events, the corridors, and civil society protests, first touching upon spaces within conference venues before zooming out to consider how conferences manifest outside and beyond their dedicated venue. Building on this scene-setting, the chapter outlines the distinction between using the various conference spaces as sites for data collection and treating them as research objects in their own right. It especially underscores the need for comparative research across processes, notably by providing novel insights on the side-event phenomenon. The chapter makes explicit much of the implicit knowledge that enables seasoned participants to smoothly navigate these events and aims to stimulate scholarship that advances our understanding of the multifaceted nature of these conferences and their constitutive parts.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Conducting Research on Global Environmental Agreement-Making , pp. 121 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Further Reading
1.Hjerpe, M. and Linnér, B-O. (2010). Functions of COP side-events in climate-change governance. Climate Policy, 10(2), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This article examines the functions of UNFCCC side events for participants, organizers, and the negotiation process more broadly. It constitutes an excellent primer on the side-event phenomenon.Google Scholar
2.Schroeder, H. and Lovell, H. (2012). The role of non-nation-state actors and side events in the international climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 12(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This article explores linkages between side events and the negotiations. It underscores the special relevance of side events for nonstate actors.Google Scholar
3.Thew, H. (2018). Youth participation and agency in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(3), 369–389.Google Scholar
This article provides critical food for thought on a range of UNFCCC conference spaces, including side events and civil society actions.Google Scholar
References
Betzold, C., Bernauer, T., and Koubi, V. (2016). Press briefings in international climate change negotiations. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, M. (2020). The legitimation of contested carbon markets after Paris: Empirical insights from market stakeholders. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(2), 226–238.Google Scholar
Buhr, K. and Hjerpe, M. (2012). Expectations on corporate climate action under regulatory uncertainty. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 4(4), 403–419.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. M., Gray, N. J., Fairbanks, L. W., Silver, J. J., and Gruby, R. L. (2013). Oceans at Rio+ 20. Conservation Letters, 6(6), 439–447.Google Scholar
Corson, C., Gruby, R., Witter, R. et al. (2014). Everyone's solution? Defining and redefining protected areas at the Convention on Biological Diversity. Conservation and Society, 12(2), 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaventa, J. (2010). Environmental mega-conferences and climate governance beyond the nation-state: A Bali case study. St Antony’s International Review, 5(2), 29–45.Google Scholar
Hadden, J. (2014). Explaining variation in transnational climate change activism: The role of inter-movement spillover. Global Environmental Politics, 14(2), 7–25.Google Scholar
Hjerpe, M. and Buhr, K. (2014). Frames of climate change in side events from Kyoto to Durban. Global Environmental Politics, 14(2), 102–121.Google Scholar
Hughes, H., Vadrot, A. B, M., Allan, J. I., et al. (2021). Global environmental agreement-making: Upping the methodological and ethical stakes of studying negotiations. Earth System Governance, 10.Google Scholar
IISD. (2000). Summary of the Sixth Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. 13–25 November 2000. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(163): 1–19.Google Scholar
Lövbrand, E., Hjerpe, M., and Linnér, B.-O. (2017). Making climate governance global: How UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 580–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion Suiseeya, K. R. (2014). Negotiating the Nagoya Protocol: Indigenous demands for justice. Global Environmental Politics, 14(3), 102–124.Google Scholar
Marion Suiseeya, K. R., and Zanotti, L. (2019). Making influence visible: Innovating ethnography at the Paris Climate Summit. Global Environmental Politics, 19(2), 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., and Linnér, B.-O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(1), 109–126.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. D. (2016). From REDD+ forests to green landscapes? Analyzing the emerging integrated landscape approach discourse in the UNFCCC. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uldam, J. (2013). Activism and the online mediation opportunity structure: Attempts to impact global climate change policies? Policy & Internet, 5(1), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by