References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 March 2025
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Complex Systems View on the Visual Arts , pp. 382 - 431Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2004). The artistic personality: A systems perspective. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 31–42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achlioptas, P., Ovsjanikov, M., Haydarov, K., Elhoseiny, M., & Guibas, L. J. (2021). ArtEmis: Affective language for visual art. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, TN, USA (pp. 11569–11579). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adajian, Th. (2003). On the cluster account of art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 43(4), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adajian, Th. (2022). The definition of art. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2022 ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/art-definition/Google Scholar
Adler, M. (2006). Stardom and talent. In Ginsburgh, V. A. & Throsby, D. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 895–906). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01025-8Google Scholar
Agassi, J. (2003). Progress in science and in art. In Agassi, J. (Ed.), Science and culture. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 231, pp. 260–269). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2946-8_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H., & O’Boyle, E. (2014). Star performers in twenty‐first century organizations. Personnel Psychology, 67, 313–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/PEPS.12054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleem, H., Correa-Herran, I., & Grzywacz, N. M. (2020). A theoretical framework for how we learn aesthetic values. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 345–362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aletti, G., Crimaldi, I., & Ghiglietti, A. (2023). Interacting innovation processes. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 17187. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–023-43967-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthelemy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(21), 11149–11152. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200327197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambrožicÿ, M., & Vettese, A. (2013). Art as a thinking process: Visual forms of knowledge production. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M., Wheeler, M., & Sprevak, M. (2020). Distributed cognition and the humanities. In Anderson, M., Garratt, P., & Sprevak, M. (Eds.), Distributed cognition in victorian culture and modernism (Vol. 1, pp. 1–17). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. C., Bischof, W. F., Laidlaw, K. E., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Recurrence quantification analysis of eye movements. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 842–856. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0299-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angelini, F., Castellani, M., & Pattitoni, P. (2023). Artist names as human brands: Brand determinants, creation and co-creation mechanisms. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 41(1), 80–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374211072964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anjum, R. L., & Mumford, S. (2018). Dispositionalism: A dynamic theory of causation. In Nicholson, D. J. & Dupré, J. (Eds.), Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology (pp. 61–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annechini, C., Menardo, E., Hall, R., & Pasini, M. (2020). Aesthetic attributes of museum environmental experience: A pilot study with children as visitors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 508300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.508300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ardizzone, A., & Zorloni, A. (2014). Factors driving the contemporary art market: A quantitative analysis. Milan: IULM University. www.siecon.org/sites/siecon.org/files/oldfiles/uploads/2015/10/Ardizzone.pdfGoogle Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1962). The genesis of a painting: Picasso’s “Guernica”. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ashe, A., Colot, V., & Oldroyd, B. P. (2021). How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1826), 20200111. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asquith, S. L., Wang, X., Quintana, D. S., & Abraham, A. (2022). Predictors of creativity in young people: Using frequentist and Bayesian approaches in estimating the importance of individual and contextual factors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assaf, A., Kristoufek, L., Demir, E., & Mitra, S. K. (2021). Market efficiency in the art markets using a combination of long memory, fractal dimension, and approximate entropy measures. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 71, 101312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, C. D. M. (2003). Frans Hals’s Virtuoso Brushwork. Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek (NKJ)/Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art, 54, 280–307. www.jstor.org/stable/24706512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, C. D. M. (2015). The Signature Style of Frans Hals: Painting, subjectivity, and the market in early modernity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. www.aup.nl/en/book/9789089643353/the-signature-style-of-frans-halsGoogle Scholar
Atmanspacher, H. (2007). Contextual emergence from physics to cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(1–2), 18–36.Google Scholar
Austerlitz, F., & Heyer, E. (2018). Neutral theory: From complex population history to natural selection and sociocultural phenomena in human populations. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(6), 1304–1307. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avila, F., Delrieux, C., & Gasaneo, G. (2019). Complexity analysis of eye-tracking trajectories: Permutation entropy may unravel cognitive styles. The European Physical Journal B, 92, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2019–100437-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awad, S. H., Wagoner, B., & Glaveanu, V. (2017). In Awad, S. H. & Wagoner, B. (Eds.), The street art of resistance (pp. 161–180). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63330-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baas, M., Nijstad, B. A., Boot, N. C., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2016). Mad genius revisited: Vulnerability to psychopathology, biobehavioral approach-avoidance, and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 142(6), 668–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baedke, J. (2013). The epigenetic landscape in the course of time: Conrad Hal Waddington’s methodological impact on the life sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(4), 756–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.06.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. (1987). Self-organized criticality: An explanation of 1/f noise. Physics Review Letters, 59, 381–384. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, C., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. (2005). Bayesian models of human action understanding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18 (NIPS 2005). https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2005/hash/f5b1b89d98b7286673128a5fb112cb9a-Abstract.htmlGoogle Scholar
Baldin, A., & Bille, T. (2022). Who is an artist? Heterogeneity and professionalism among visual artists. In Woronkowicz, J. (Ed.), Arts, entrepreneurship, and innovation (pp. 9–38). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. (Original article in Journal of Cultural Economics (2021) 45:527–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09400-5). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18195-5_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, J., & Burgess, M. (2013). A phenomenology of artistic doing: Flow as embodied knowing in 2D and 3D professional artists. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 44(1), 60–91. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbieri, P., Sarasso, P., Lodico, F., Aliverti, A., Murayama, K., Sacco, K., & Ronga, I. (2024). The aesthetic valve: How aesthetic appreciation may switch emotional states from anxiety to curiosity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1895), 20220413. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartel, C., & Kwong, J. M. (2021). Pluralism, eliminativism, and the definition of art. European Journal of Aesthetics, LVIII /XIV(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.213Google Scholar
Barton, G., & Baguley, M. (Eds.). (2017). The Palgrave handbook of global arts education (Vol. 21, No. 1). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55585-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batty, M. (2006). Rank clocks. Nature, 444(7119), 592–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baudson, T. G. (2016). The mad genius stereotype: Still alive and well. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F. (2016). Toward a general theory of motivation: Problems, challenges, opportunities, and the big picture. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9521-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxandall, M. (1980). The limewood sculptors of Renaissance Germany. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, J. (2021). James Castle: Memory palace. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, M. C. (1982). The aesthetic point of view: Selected essays, Edited by Wreen, M. J. & Callen, D. M.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (2014). A socio-historical overview of the creativity–pathology connection: From antiquity to contemporary times. In Kaufman, J. C. (Ed.), Creativity and mental illness (pp. 3–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139128902.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. S. (2008). Art Worlds, 25th Anniversary Edition (Updated and Expanded). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520934870Google Scholar
Beckert, J. (2020). Markets from meaning: Quality uncertainty and the intersubjective construction of value. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(2), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez035Google Scholar
Beckert, J., & Rössel, J. (2013). “The price of art.” Uncertainty and reputation in the art field. European Societies, 15(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2013.767923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedau, M. A., & Humphreys, P. E. (2008). Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beggs, J. M. (2019). The critically tuned cortex. Neuron, 104(4), 623–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beggs, J. M. (2022). The cortex and the critical point: Understanding the power of emergence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13588.003.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belke, B., Leder, H., & Carbon, C. C. (2015). When challenging art gets liked: Evidences for a dual preference formation process for fluent and non-fluent portraits. PLoS One, 10(8), e0131796. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131796CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellavitis, M. (2018). Making copies in European art 1400–1600: Shifting tastes, modes of transmission, and changing contexts (Vol. 286). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004379596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsen, P. (2014). The street art world. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Bengtsen, P. (2020). The monetization of the street art world and the fossilization of urban public space. Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, 9(1–2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1386/vi_00009_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhamou, F., & Ginsburgh, V. (2006). Copies of artworks: The case of paintings and prints. In Ginsburg, V. A. & Throsby, D. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 253–283). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01008-8Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1935/2018). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Watson, S., Barnes, A. J., & Bunning, K. (Eds.), A museum studies approach to heritage (pp. 226–243). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, T. (1995). The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315002668Google Scholar
Beslon, G., Liard, V., Parsons, D. P., & Rouzaud-Cornabas, J. (2021). Of evolution, systems and complexity. In Crombach, A. (Ed.), Evolutionary systems biology: Advances, questions, and opportunities (pp. 1–18). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71737-7_1Google Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2008). Issues in process metaphysics. Ecological Psychology, 20(3), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410802189273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2009). The interactivist model. Synthese, 166, 547–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9375-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2011a). Some consequences (and enablings) of process metaphysics. Axiomathes: An International Journal in Ontology & Cognitive Systems, 21(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-010-9130-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2011b). Systems and process metaphysics. In Hooker, C. (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science, Vol. 10: Philosophy of complex systems (pp. 91–104). Amsterdam: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52076-0.50002-XGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C. (2004). Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October Magazine, 110, 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/0162287042379810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso books.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2015). Against digital art history. https://humanitiesfutures.org/papers/digital-art-history/Google Scholar
Björneborn, L. (2023). Adjacent possible. In Glăveanu, V. P. (Ed.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of the possible (pp. 16–28). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_100Google Scholar
Bocart, F. Y. R. P., Gertsberg, M., & Pownall, R. A. J. (2022). An empirical analysis of price differences for male and female artists in the global art market. Journal of Cultural Economics, 46, 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccardi, E., & Perelda, F. (2020). What it is like to be a Dialetheia. The ontology of true contradictions. Eternity & Contradiction: Journal of Fundamental Ontology, 2(2), 116–162. https://doi.org/10.7346/e&c-022020-08Google Scholar
Boivin, K. M. (2021). Riemenschneider in Rothenburg: Sacred space and civic identity in the late medieval city. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Boivin, K. M., & Bryda, G. C. (2021). Riemenschneider in situ. London: Harvey Miller Publishers.Google Scholar
Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. (1984). Developmental psychology and the problem of artistic change. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 43(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/429988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsboom, D. (2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosma, H. A., & Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botella, M., Glaveanu, V., Zenasni, F., Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Wolff, M., & Lubart, T. (2013). How artists create: Creative process and multivariate factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botella, M., Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2018). What are the stages of the creative process? What visual art students are saying. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botz-Bornstein, Th. (2019). The New Aesthetics of Deculturation. Neoliberalism, Fundamentalism, and Kitsch. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350086371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Brenner, P. S., & DeLamater, J. (2016). Lies, damned lies, and survey self-reports? Identity as a cause of measurement bias. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(4), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516628298CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brey, A. (2021). Digital art history in 2021. History Compass, 19(8), e12678. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brieber, D., Nadal, M., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2014). Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS One, 9(6), e99019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brielmann, A. A., Berentelg, M., & Dayan, P. (2024). Modelling individual aesthetic judgements over time. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 379(1895), 20220414. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0414Google ScholarPubMed
Briki, W., & Markman, K. D. (2018). Psychological momentum: The phenomenology of goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(9), e12412. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinck, I. (2018). Empathy, engagement, entrainment: The interaction dynamics of aesthetic experience. Cognitive Processing, 19(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0805-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Psychological Society. (2011). Response to the American Psychiatric Association: DSM-5 Development. https://dxrevisionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/dsm-5-2011-bps-response.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brodsky, J. (1980). Continuity and discontinuity in style: A problem in art historical methodology. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 39(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/429916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broido, A. D., & Clauset, A. (2019). Scale-free networks are rare. Nature Communications, 10, 1017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467–019-08746-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosens, K., Alen, K., Slegten, A., & Truyen, F. (2016). MapTap and Cornelia. Foundations of a slow digital art history and formal art historical social network research. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte, 79, 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZKG-2016-0025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. (1986). Enemies of Flattery: Velazquez’ Portraits of Philip IV. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 17(1), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.2307/204128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., & Dissanayake, E. (2018). The synthesis of the arts: From ceremonial ritual to “total work of art”. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, L. (2022). The global rules of art: The emergence and divisions of a cultural world economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bueichekú, E., Gonzalez-de-Echavarri, J. M., Ortiz-Teran, L., Montal, V., d’Oleire Uquillas, F., De Marcos, L., … & Sepulcre, J. (2021). Divergent connectomic organization delineates genetic evolutionary traits in the human brain. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 19692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99082-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullot, N. J., & Reber, R. (2013). The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callander, A., & Cummings, M. E. (2021). Liminal spaces: A review of the art in entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurship in art. Small Business Economics, 57, 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00421-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. (2009). A process-based model for an interactive ontology. Synthese, 166(3), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9372-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. (2015). The metaphysics of emergence. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137502384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candela, G., Castellani, M., Pattitoni, P., & Di Lascio, F. M. L. (2016). On Rosen’s and Adler’s hypotheses in the modern and contemporary visual art market. Empirical Economics, 51, 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-1002-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelletto, C. (2022). Embodying art: How we see, think, feel, and create. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/capp19586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbon, C.-C. (2011). Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. i-Perception, 2(7), 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0463aapCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carbon, C.-C. (2014). Understanding human perception by human-made illusions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00566CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carbon, C.-C. (2017). Art perception in the museum: How we spend time and space in art exhibitions. i-Perception, 8(1), 2041669517694184. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517694184MinissaleCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carbon, C.-C. (2019). Empirical approaches to studying art experience. Journal of Perceptual Imaging, 2(1), 010501-1–010501-7. https://doi.org/10.2352/J.Percept.Imaging.2019.2.1.010501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbon, C.-C. (2020). Ecological art experience: How we can gain experimental control while preserving ecologically valid settings and contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, N. (Ed.). (2000). Theories of art today. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (2007). Art and globalization: Then and now. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00244.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, N. (2021). Arthur Danto’s Philosophy of Art: Essays. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004468368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, J. M. (2018). Thinking with images: An enactivist aesthetics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascales, R. (2019). Arthur Danto and the end of art. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Cascales, R. (2023). Interpreting AI-generated art: Arthur Danto’s perspective on intention, authorship, and creative traditions in the age of artificial intelligence. The Polish Journal of Aesthetics, 71(4), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.19205/71.23.2Google Scholar
Castellano, G., & Vessio, G. (2022). A deep learning approach to clustering visual arts. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(11), 2590–2605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263–022-01664-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824–844. www.jstor.org/stable/25146223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cela-Conde, C. J., Agnati, L., Huston, J. P., Mora, F., & Nadal, M. (2011). The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Progress in Neurobiology, 94(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.03.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cetinic, E., Lipic, T., & Grgic, S. (2020). Learning the principles of art history with convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognition Letters, 129, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2019.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chame, H. F., Mota, F. P., & da Costa Botelho, S. S. (2019). A dynamic computational model of motivation based on self-determination theory and CANN. Information Sciences, 476, 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.09.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, N., & Rowland, I. (2017). The collector of lives: Giorgio Vasari and the invention of art. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2003). Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 4(2), 55–60. https://neuroaesthetics.med.upenn.edu/assets/user-content/documents/publications/chatterjee-2003-01.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2004). The neuropsychology of visual artistic production. Neuropsychologia, 42(11), 1568–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatterjee, A. (2014). Neuroaesthetics: Descriptive and experimental approaches. In Tinio, P. & Smith, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 481–499). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207058.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, A., & Cardilo, E. (2021). Brain, beauty, and art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513620.001.0001Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatterjee, A., Widick, P., Sternschein, R., Smith, W. B., & Bromberger, B. (2010). The assessment of art attributes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemi, T. (2016). The experience of flow in artistic creation. In Harmat, L., Ørsted Andersen, F., Ullén, F., Wright, J., & Sadlo, G. (Eds.), Flow experience (pp. 37–49). Cham: Springer. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Christensen, A. P., Kenett, Y. N., Ren, Z., Condon, D. M., Bilder, R. M., Qiu, J., & Beaty, R. E. (2023). Mapping the creative personality: A psychometric network analysis of highly creative artists and scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 35(3), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2184558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chialvo, D. R. (2010). Emergent complex neural dynamics. Nature Physics, 6(10), 744–750. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, H. D. (2017). The art of copying: Five strategies for transforming originals in the art museum. Culture Unbound, 9(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.179185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, L., & Elliott, M. (2015). Distributed objects: Meaning and mattering after Alfred Gell. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. J. (1982). Clement Greenberg’s theory of art. Critical Inquiry, 9(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1086/448192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. A. (2009). Becoming Edvard Munch: Influence, anxiety, and myth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, P. (2004). Mind and emergence: From quantum to consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199272525.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, P., & Davies, P. (2011). The re-emergence of emergence: The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544318.001.0001Google Scholar
Clignet, R. (1986). The structure of artistic revolutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512801354Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R., Cloninger, K. M., Zwir, I., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2019). The complex genetics and biology of human temperament: A review of traditional concepts in relation to new molecular findings. Translational Psychiatry, 9(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0621-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clowney, D. (2008). A third system of the arts? An exploration of some ideas from Larry Shiner’s the invention of art: A cultural history. Contemporary Aesthetics, 6(1), 4. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.7523862.0006.004Google Scholar
Clowney, D. (2011). Definitions of art and fine art’s historical origins. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 69(3), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2011.01474.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coate, B., Hoffmann, R., Arenius, P., & Chuah, S. H. (2021). A behavioural approach to understanding the artist as entrepreneur. In Lazzaro, E., Moureau, N., & Turpin, A. (Eds.), Researching art markets (pp. 86–98). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018674-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Cruz, J. (2016). The imagination and beyond: Toward a method of evaluating socially engaged art. In Grady, E. M. (Ed.), Future imperfect (pp. 144–153). New York: A Blade of Grass Books.Google Scholar
Colvin, G. (2008). Talent is overrated: What really separates world-class performers from everybody else. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Corradini, A., & O’Connor, T. (2010). Emergence in science and philosophy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R. F. A., Tschacher, W., & van Geert, P. (2023). Modelling art experiences based on the theory of complex dynamical systems. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ys4cbCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R. F. A., & van Klaveren, L.-M. (2024). The embodied experience of abstract art: An exploratory study. Ecological Psychology, 36(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2024.2355901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, D. (2009). The talent code. Greatness isn’t born. It’s grown. Here’s how. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8Google Scholar
Crowther, P. (2009). Phenomenology of the visual arts (even the frame). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, P. (2013). Phenomenologies of art and vision: A post-analytic turn. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472545800Google Scholar
Crowther, P. (2017). What drawing and painting really mean. The phenomenology of image and gesture. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315311852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper & Collins.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–336). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy? American Psychologist, 54(10), 821–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1973). The personality of young artists: An empirical and theoretical exploration. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01331.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, A. M. (2014). Narratives, mechanisms and progress in historical science. Synthese, 191(6), 1163–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0317-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. (1989). An ontology of art. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20038-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. (2021). Style and the agency in art 1. In Sedivy, S. (Ed.), Art, representation, and make-believe: Essays on the philosophy of Kendall L. Walton (pp. 265–283). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, J. M., Henson, S. M., Desharnais, R. A., Dennis, B., Costantino, R. F., & King, A. (2001). A chaotic attractor in ecology: Theory and experimental data. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 12(2), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusmariu, A. (2021). How innovative was Picasso’s Demoiselles d’Avignon? Academia Letters, Article 3518. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. O. (2018). The religion of art. In Dahlstrom, D. O. (Ed.), Philosophy and art (pp. 235–254). Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damásio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1964). The artworld. The Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.2307/2022937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace. A philosophy of art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1985). The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. Grand Street, 4(3), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/25006747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1985/2007). Narration and knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1998). The end of art: A philosophical defense. History and Theory, 37(4), 127–143. www.jstor.org/stable/2505400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, A. C. (2001). Vagina Monologue. The Nation, September 3. www.thenation.com/article/archive/vagina-monologue/Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (2003). Renee Cox: Yo Mama’s last supper. In Danto, A. C. (Ed.), Unnatural wonders: Essays from the gap between art and life (pp. 101–108). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (2013). What art is. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300195118Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (2015). After the end of art: Contemporary art and the pale of history (Updated ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691209302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, N., & Nielsen, C. (2023). Gadamer’s Aesthetics. In Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/gadamer-aesthetics/Google Scholar
Davidson, I. (2023). Humans making history through continuities and discontinuities in art. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 33(4), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774323000057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., & Nowell, A. (Eds.). (2021). Making scenes: Global perspectives on scenes in rock art. New York: Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781789209204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. (2008). Art as performance. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774922Google Scholar
Davies, S. (2004). The cluster theory of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 44(3), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/44.3.297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, S. (2007). Philosophical perspectives on art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, S. (2012). The artful species: Aesthetics, art, and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658541.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Duve, Th. (1994). When form has become attitude – And beyond. In de Ville, N. & Foster, S. (Eds.), The artist and the academy: Issues in fine art education and the wider cultural context (pp. 23–40). Southampton, England: John Hansard Gallery.Google Scholar
de Oliveira, P. M. C. (2001). Why do evolutionary systems stick to the edge of chaos. Theory in Biosciences, 120(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0101170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, N. M. P., Den Hartigh, R. J. R., Cox, R. F. A., Van Geert, P. L. C., & Kunnen, E. S. (2015). The temporal structure of state self-esteem variability during parent-adolescent interactions: More than random fluctuations. Self and Identity, 14(3), 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.994026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, N. M. P., & Gmelin, J.-O.H. (2021). What is real about “real time” anyway? A proposal for a pluralistic approach to studying identity processes across different timescales. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 21(4), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2021.1969937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, N. M. P., Van Geert, P. L. C., & Kunnen, E. S. (2017). Explaining the “how” of self-esteem development: The self-organizing self-esteem model. Review of General Psychology, 21(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, T. (2011). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Cox, S. R., & Hill, W. D. (2022). Genetic variation, brain, and intelligence differences. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01027-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Den Hartigh, R. J. R., Van Dijk, M. W. G., Steenbeek, H. W., & Van Geert, P. L. C. (2016). A dynamic network model to explain the development of excellent human performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00532CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deranty, J. (2010). Regimes of the arts. In Deranty, J. (Ed.), Jacques Rancière: Key concepts (pp. 116–130). London: Acumen Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654727.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, R. (2018). Hack the experience: Tools for artists from cognitive science. Santa Barbara, CA: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (1974). Art and the aesthetic. An institutional analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (2003). The new institutional theory of art. In Lamarque, P. & Olson, S. H. (Eds.), Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: The analytic tradition: An anthology (pp. 47–54). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. (Originally published in 1983).Google Scholar
Dietrich, A. (2014). The mythconception of the mad genius. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00079CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2010). Goals, attention, and (un)consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dissanayake, E. (1979). An ethological view of ritual and art in human evolutionary history. Leonardo, 12(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1574079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (2000). Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Washington, DC: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (2008). The arts after Darwin: Does art have an origin and adaptive function? In Zijlmans, K. & van Damme, W. (Eds.), World art studies: Exploring concepts and approaches (pp. 241–263). Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
Dixson, A. F., & Dixson, B. J. (2011). Venus figurines of the European paleolithic: Symbols of fertility or attractiveness? Journal of Anthropology, 2011, 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/569120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolese, M. J., & Kozbelt, A. (2020). Communication and meaning-making are central to understanding aesthetic response in any context. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00473CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donald, M. (2006). Art and cognitive evolution. In Turner, M. (Ed.), The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306361.003.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorman, M. (2003). Art in progress: A philosophical response to the end of the avant-garde. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreon, R. (2023). On the meanings and implications of Joseph Margolis’ definition of art. East Asian Journal of Philosophy, 2(2), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.19079/eajp.2.2.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressen, A. (2021). The intellectual education of the Italian Renaissance Artist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108916899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duddy, T. (1999). Teaching the unteachable: Art and the ideology of genius. Circa, 89, 22–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/25563493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukes, D., Abrams, K., Adolphs, R., Ahmed, M. E., Beatty, A., Berridge, K. C., … & Sander, D. (2021). The rise of affectivism. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunlop, I. (1972). The shock of the new: Seven historic exhibitions of modern art. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson,Google Scholar
Dupré, J., & Nicholson, D. J. (2018). A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. In Nicholson, D. J. & Dupré, J. (Eds.), Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology (pp. 3–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.003.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, D. (2009). The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure, and human evolution. New York: Bloomsbury Press. www.bloomsbury.com/us/art-instinct-9781608191932/Google Scholar
Editorial, A. (2019). Time to move beyond average thinking. Nature Physics, 15, 1207. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0758-3Google Scholar
Eikhof, D. R., & Haunschild, A. (2007). For art’s sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(5), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgammal, A., Liu, B., Kim, D., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2018). The shape of art history in the eyes of the machine. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 32(1), 2183–2191. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, J. (2019). What painting is (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429453700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, J., Valiavicharska, Z., & Kim, A. (Eds.). (2015). Art and globalization. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, W. D., Levy, K. N., Newman, M. G., Pincus, A. L., Wilson, S. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2020). Dynamics among borderline personality and anxiety features in psychotherapy outpatients: An exploration of nomothetic and idiographic patterns. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, L. Q. (2017). There is no theory of everything. A physics perspective on emergence. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59150-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Érdi, P. (2007). Complexity explained. Berlin: Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35778-0Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada-Gonzalez, V., East, S., Garbutt, M., & Spehar, B. (2020). Viewing art in different contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etro, F. (2018). The economics of renaissance art. The Journal of Economic History, 78(2), 500–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050718000244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etro, F., & Stepanova, E. (2018). Power-laws in art. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 506, 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evershed, R. P., Davey Smith, G., Roffet-Salque, M., Timpson, A., Diekmann, Y., Lyon, M. S., … & Thomas, M. G. (2022). Dairying, diseases and the evolution of lactase persistence in Europe. Nature, 608(7922), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05010-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favela, L. H. (2020). Cognitive science as complexity science. WIREs Cognitive Science, 11, e1525. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1525CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.016Google Scholar
Fejfer, J., & Johannsen, K. B. (Eds.). (2022). Sculpture workshops as space and concept: Creating the portrait. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Félix-Jäger, S. (2020). Art theory for a global pluralistic age. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29706-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feltman, J. M., & Thompson, S. (2019). The long lives of medieval art and architecture. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351181129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feudel, U., Pisarchik, A. N., & Showalter, K. (2018). Multistability and tipping: From mathematics and physics to climate and brain – Minireview and preface to the focus issue. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 28(3), 033501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5027718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillis, I. (2010). The tension between artistic and market orientation in visual art. In Kerrigan, F. (Ed.), Marketing the arts: A fresh approach (pp. 31–39). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855072Google Scholar
Fine, G. A. (2003). Crafting authenticity: The validation of identity in self-taught art. Theory and Society, 32, 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023943503531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. A. (2006). Everyday genius: Self-taught art and the culture of authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226249605.001.0001Google Scholar
Fine, G. A. (2018). Talking art: The culture of practice and the practice of culture in MFA education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226560359.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingelkurts, A. A., & Fingelkurts, A. A. (2004). Making complexity simpler: Multivariability and metastability in the brain. International Journal of Neuroscience, 114(7), 843–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450490450046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fingerhut, J., & Prinz, J. J. (2020). Aesthetic emotions reconsidered. The Monist, 103(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onz037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, A., Benedek, M., Unterrainer, H.-F., Papousek, I., & Weiss, E. M. (2014). Creativity and psychopathology: Are there similar mental processes involved in creativity and in psychosis-proneness? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiore, D. (2020). The art of making images: Technological affordance, design variability and labour organization in the production of engraved artefacts and body paintings in Tierra del Fuego (southern South America). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09474-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, A. J., Medaglia, J. D., & Jeronimus, B. F. (2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(27), E6106–E6115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711978115Google ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, M. C. (1995). Making modernism: Picasso and the creation of the market for twentieth-century art. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Fleck, R. (2023). Statistical interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics. In Fleck, R. (Ed.), Entropy and the second law of thermodynamics: … or why things tend to go wrong and seem to get worse (pp. 69–85). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34950-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. A., & Kochanowski, P. (2004). Models of superstardom: An application of the Lotka and Yule distributions. Popular Music and Society, 27, 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300776042000264694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraiberger, S. P., Sinatra, R., Resch, M., Riedl, C., & Barabási, A. L. (2018). Quantifying reputation and success in art. Science, 362(6416), 825–829. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau7224CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, S. A. (2009). The common patterns of nature. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22(8), 1563–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01775.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frascaroli, J., Leder, H., Brattico, E., & Van de Cruys, S. (2024). Aesthetics and predictive processing: Grounds and prospects of a fruitful encounter. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1895), 20220410. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeland, C. A. (2001). But is it art? An introduction to art theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. A. (2010). Portraits and persons: A philosophical inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. (2012). Art’s emotions: Ethics, expression and aesthetic experience. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315729985Google Scholar
Friston, K., & Ao, P. (2012). Free energy, value, and attractors. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2012, 937860. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/937860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuchs, Th. (2022). The not-yet-conscious: Protentional consciousness and the emergence of the new. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 23, 717–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09869-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2017). Personality traits, personality disorders, and creativity. In Feist, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 251–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality, intelligence, and art. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00128-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fürst, G., & Lubart, T. (2017). An integrative approach to the creative personality: Beyond the big five paradigm. In Feist, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 140–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galenson, D. W. (1999). Quantifying artistic success: Ranking French Painters – and paintings – From impressionism to Cubism. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 7407. www.nber.org/papers/w7407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galenson, D. W. (2001). Painting outside the lines: Patterns of creativity in modern art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv219kxp1Google Scholar
Galenson, D. W. (2006). Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of artistic creativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400837397Google Scholar
Galenson, D. W. (2009). Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of artistic creativity. Journal of Applied Economics, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(09)60002-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, A. (2018). Processes as patterns of occurrence. In Stout, R. (Ed.), Process, action and experience (pp. 41–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198777991.003.0003Google Scholar
Gann, L. H., & Duignan, P. (1979/2015). The Rulers of Belgian Africa, 1884–1914. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x17wvCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaut, B. (2005). The cluster account of art defended. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 45(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayi032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gernigon, C., Briki, W., & Eykens, K. (2010). The dynamics of psychological momentum in sport: The role of ongoing history of performance patterns. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.3.377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gertsman, E. (2015). Worlds within: Opening the medieval Shrine Madonna. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Oxford: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.2307/1574154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gikandi, S. (2003). Picasso, Africa, and the schemata of difference. Modernism/Modernity, 10(3), 455–480. https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2003.0062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, H. (2022). Kant’s aesthetics and teleology. In Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2022 ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/kant-aesthetics/Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2011). Gene–culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1566), 878–888. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glăveanu, V. P., & Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Creative experience: A non-standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381Google Scholar
Goldsmith, L. T. (2000). Tracking trajectories of talent: Child prodigies growing up. In Friedman, R. C. & Shore, B. M. (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 89–122). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10373-005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gompertz, W. (2013). What are you looking at? The surprising, shocking, and sometimes strange story of 150 years of modern art. New York: Pume (Penguin Group).Google Scholar
Gonen, T., Admon, R., Podlipsky, I., & Hendler, T. (2012). From animal model to human brain networking: Dynamic causal modeling of motivational systems. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(21), 7218–7224. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6188-11.2012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, M. J. (2020). Children Draw: A guide to why, when and how children make art. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Gosetti-Ferencei, J. A. (2020). Distributed cognition and the phenomenology of modernist painting and poetry (Rilke and Cézanne). In Anderson, M., Garratt, P., & Sprevak, M. (Eds.), Distributed cognition in Victorian culture and modernism (pp. 113–133). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442244.003.0007Google Scholar
Gotsi, M., Andriopoulos, C., Lewis, M. W., & Ingram, A. E. (2010). Managing creatives: Paradoxical approaches to identity regulation. Human Relations, 63(6), 781–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709342929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205(1161), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086Google Scholar
Graham, G. (2007). The re-enchantment of the world: Art versus religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M. (2019). Assessment in the visual arts: Challenges and possibilities. Arts Education Policy Review, 120(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2019.1579131Google Scholar
Green, C., & Gardner, A. (2016). Biennials, triennials, and documenta: The exhibitions that created contemporary art. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greenwald, D. S. (2021). Painting by numbers: Data-driven histories of nineteenth-century art. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214948Google Scholar
Grew, R. (2007). The immortal self: Surrealist alter egos. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=wk58dKAAAAAJ&citation_for_view=wk58dKAAAAAJ:UeHWp8X0CEICGoogle Scholar
Grew, R. (2015). States of transition: The femme fatale in the art of Fernand Khnopff and Leonor Fini. In Facos, M. & Mednick, T. J. (Eds.), The symbolist roots of modern art (pp. 71–84). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Gross, E. C. (2022). The artists in the branded world. A theoretical approach to artist personal branding. Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media, 15(43), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.24193/jmr.43.4Google Scholar
Groys, B. (1992). The total art of stalinism: Avant-garde, aesthetic dictatorship, and beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Groys, B. (2008). Art power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7469.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10080/10400418809534285.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (1998). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guastello, S. J. (2013). Chaos, catastrophe, and human affairs: Applications of nonlinear dynamics to work, organizations, and social evolution. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gultepe, E., Conturo, T. E., & Makrehchi, M. (2018). Predicting and grouping digitized paintings by style using unsupervised feature learning. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 31, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.11.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacking, I. (2016). Chapter 5: Paradigms. In Richards, R. & Daston, L. (Eds.), Kuhn’s ‘structure of scientific revolutions’ at fifty: Reflections on a science classic (pp. 96–114). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226317175.003.0005Google Scholar
Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics – An introduction. Nonequilibrium phase-transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96363-6Google Scholar
Haken, H. (2017). What can synergetics contribute to embodied aesthetics? Behavioral Sciences, 7(3), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7030061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halsall, F. (2007). No medium just a shell: How works of art configure their medium. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 6(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.6.1.45_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsall, F. (2008). Systems of art: Art, history and systems theory. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Halsall, F. (2013). Styles of observation and embodiment. In De Preester, H. (Ed.), Moving imagination: Explorations of gesture and inner movement (pp. 221–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsall, F. (2017). Attractors and locked-in art: Art history as a complex system. In Van Tuinen, S. (Ed.), Speculative art histories: Analysis at the limits (pp. 39–60). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474421041.003.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsall, F. (2023). Contemporary art, systems and the aesthetics of dispersion. London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003315322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Z. B., Lehmberg, E. S., & Bradburd, G. S. (2021). Neo-darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory: A modern perspective on Charlesworth, Lande, and Slatkin (1982). Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 75(6), 1244–1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harter, S., & Jackson, B. K. (1992). Trait vs. nontrait conceptualizations of intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartle, S., & White, D. (2022). Visual activism in the 21st century: Art, protest and resistance in an uncertain world. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350265103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvie, J. (2013). The ‘Artrepreneur’: Artists and entrepreneurialism. In Harvey, J. (Ed.), Fair play – art, performance and neoliberalism. Performance interventions (pp. 62–107). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027290_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, R. W., & Weisberg, R. W. (2009). Career development in two seminal American songwriters: A test of the equal odds rule. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410902855275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, R. W., Weisberg, R. W., & Choi, J. (2010). Quantitative case-studies in musical composition: The development of creativity in popular-songwriting teams. Psychology of Music, 38(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735609352035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, S. (2000). Artist’s Shit. 1961, Piero Manzoni.www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/manzoni-artists-shit-t07667Google Scholar
Hazelwood, C. (2021). Practice-centered pluralism and a disjunctive theory of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 61(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayaa039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heather, D., & Deceuster, K. (2008). North Korean Posters: The David Heather Collection. New York: Prestel Publishing.Google Scholar
Heinich, N. (2014). Le paradigme de l’art contemporain. Structures d’une révolution artistique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Heinich, N. (2018). Contemporary art as a new paradigm? An artistic revolution in light of the history of science. In Sormani, P., Carbone, G., & Gisler, P. (Eds.), Practicing art/science: Experiments in an emerging field (pp. 45–55). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315175881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heino, M. T., Proverbio, D., Marchand, G., Resnicow, K., & Hankonen, N. (2022). Attractor landscapes: A unifying conceptual model for understanding behavior change across scales of observation. Health Psychology Review, 17(4), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2146598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416Google ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. (2020). Identity politics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/identity-politics/Google Scholar
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018). The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/108886831773494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoelscher, J. A. (2013). Autopoietic art systems and aesthetic swarms: Notes on polyphonic purity and algorithmic emergence. Evental Aesthetics, 2(3), 15–39.Google Scholar
Hoelscher, J. A. (2014). Diffused art and diffracted objecthood: Painting in the distributed field. In College Arts Association, Painting in the Digital Age: Twenty-First-Century Recontextualization. www.researchgate.net/publication/260480880_Diffused_Art_and_Diffracted_Objecthood_Painting_in_the_Distributed_FieldGoogle Scholar
Hoelscher, J. A. (2021). Art as information ecology: Artworks, artworlds, and complex systems aesthetics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. (2014). Complexity: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, P. (2017). Rogues’ gallery: The rise (and occasional fall) of art dealers, the hidden players in the history of art New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Hopwood, C. J., Morey, L. C., & Markon, K. E. (2023). What is a psychopathology dimension? Clinical Psychology Review, 106, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houng, C. (2019). Thinking with the hand: The practice of drawing in renaissance Italy. In Anderson, M. & Wheeler, M. (Eds.), Distributed cognition in medieval and renaissance culture (pp. 171–189). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438131.003.0010Google Scholar
Huber, J. C. (1998). Cumulative advantage and success-breeds-success: The value of time pattern analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(5), 471. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980415)49:5<471::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-TGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. C. (2000). A statistical analysis of special cases of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01212.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, G. W. (2013). Beyond serial stages for attentional selection: The critical role of action. In Prinz, W., Beisert, M., & Herwig, A. (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 229–251). Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018555.003.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, P. (2016). Emergence: A philosophical account. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190620325.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, M. (2019). Significant form and aesthetic emotion: Bloomsbury theorizes modern art’s “mysterious laws” of creativity. In Nalbantian, S. & Matthews, P. M. (Eds.), Secrets of creativity: What neuroscience, the arts, and our minds reveal (Online ed.). New York: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190462321.003.0018Google Scholar
Huston, J. P., Nadal, M., Mora, F., Agnati, L. F., & Conde, C. J. C. (Eds.). (2015). Art, aesthetics, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iigaya, K., Yi, S. I., Wahle, A., Tanwisuth, K., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2020). Aesthetic preference for art emerges from a weighted integration over hierarchically structured visual features in the brain. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.09.940353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2017b). On human correspondence. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingthorsson, R. D. (2021). A powerful particulars view of causation. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iranowsk, J. (2018). Copying as museum branding: Souvenirs with Edvard Munch’s bedspread pattern. In Brenna, B., Dam Christensen, H., & Hamran, O. (Eds.), Museums as cultures of copies: The crafting of artefacts and authenticity (pp. 131–143). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351106498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving-Pease, E. K., Refoyo-Martínez, A., Barrie, W., Ingason, A., Pearson, A., Fischer, A., … & Willerslev, E. (2024). The selection landscape and genetic legacy of ancient Eurasians. Nature, 625(7994), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06705-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israëls, M. B. (2020). Piero della Francesca and the invention of the artist. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J., & Monk, N. (2014). Bioattractors: Dynamical systems theory and the evolution of regulatory processes. The Journal of Physiology, 592(11), 2267–2281. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2014.272385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamison, K. R. (1993). Touched with fire: Manic depressive illness and the artistic temperament. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jasienski, A. (2021). Velázquez and the Fragile Portrait of the King. Art History, 44(5), 922–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.12604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, H. J. (2017). It is an illusion to think that ‘things’ exist. In Thurner, S. (Ed.), Exploring complexity: Volume 3, 43 visions for complexity. Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813206854_0011Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G., McCormack, J., Santos, I., & Romero, J. (2019). Understanding aesthetics and fitness measures in evolutionary art systems. Complexity, 2019, Article 3495962. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3495962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. G., & Ratterman, N. L. (2009). Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(Suppl. 1), 10001–10008. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901129106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, A. M., & Cochrane, A. (2018). The archaeology of art: Materials, practices, affects. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315691343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. A. (2017). The global work of art: World’s fairs, biennials and the aesthetics of experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226291888.001.0001Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Agrawal, A., & Nair, S. (2020). Art Style Classification with Self-Trained Ensemble of AutoEncoding Transformations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.03377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, S. P. (2005). Innovation motivation and artistic creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01248.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, R., & Meadows, C. (2017). Sweet dreams are made of this: The role of openness in creativity and brain networks. In Feist, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 28–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, W., Pelster, A., Schanz, M., & Schöll, E. (2010). Delayed complex systems: An overview. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 368(1911), 303–304. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0243Google ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K. (2017). A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2036–2051. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000339CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, A., Garner, J. K., & Brock, B. (2019). Identity and motivation in a changing world: A complex dynamic systems perspective. In Gonida, E. N. & Lemos, M. S. (Eds.), Motivation in education at a time of global change (Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 20, pp. 101–127). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320190000020006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Gigerenzer, G. (2013). Modeling decision heuristics. In Lee, J. D. & Kirlik, A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering (pp. 490–500). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199757183.013.0034Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. A. (2019). A world beyond physics: The emergence and evolution of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kehagia, A. A. (2009). Anais Nin: A case study of personality disorder and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(8), 800–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, E., & Wlodarski, A. (Eds.). (2011). Art outside the lines: New perspectives on GDR art culture. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401200400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J. S. (2012). Multistability and metastability: Understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1591), 906–918. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelso, J. S., & Engstrom, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1988.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J. S., & Engstrøm, D. A. (2024). The squiggle sense: Sixth sense of the complementary nature and the metastable brain~mind. Cham: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J. S., & Tognoli, E. (2007). Toward a complementary neuroscience: Metastable coordination dynamics of the brain. In Perlovsky, L. I. & Kozma, R. (Eds.), Neurodynamics of cognition and consciousness. Understanding complex systems (pp. 39–60). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73267-9_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, G. (2021). Collingwood’s aesthetics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2021 ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/collingwood-aesthetics/Google Scholar
Kern, A. D., & Hahn, M. W. (2018). The neutral theory in light of natural selection. Molecular Biology and eEvolution, 35(6), 1366–1371. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy092CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kienle, M. (2017). Between nodes and edges: Possibilities and limits of network analysis in art history. Artl@s Bulleti, 6(3), Article 1. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/artlas/vol6/iss3/1/Google Scholar
Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2017). Comparative analysis of Dutch art and impressionism through an interdisciplinary method. In 2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI), Shanghai, China (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. (2006). The judgment of Paris: The revolutionary decade that gave the world Impressionism. London: Walker & Company/Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Kırmızı, D. (2013). Aesthetic experience in performance art: Marina Abramović the artist is present. Doctoral dissertation, Bilkent Universitesi, Turkey. http://hdl.handle.net/11693/16538Google Scholar
Kiss, T., & Pack, A. (2023). A dynamic network analysis of an L2 motivation system: The role of central relational links. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 5(1), e5113223. https://doi.org/10.52598/jpll/5/1/1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Salvador, C. E. (2024). Cultural psychology: Beyond east and west. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 495–526. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-021723-063333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, R. B. (2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14136-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappett, C. (2011). An archaeology of interaction: Network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199215454.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (Eds.). (2008). Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Cham: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koblížek, T. (2023). Contemporary art and the problem of indiscernibles: An adverbialist approach. Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics, 60(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.283Google Scholar
Kolev, I. (2023). Defining art as phenomenal being. Arts, 12, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12030100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2004). Originality and technical skill as components of artistic quality. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.2190/NDR5-G09N-X7RE-34H7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2006). Dynamic evaluation of Matisse’s 1935 Large Reclining Nude. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.2190/A2VY-TEBW-VH45-285ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. E. (1989). Retaining the original? The state of the question. Studies in the History of Art, 20, 7–11. www.jstor.org/stable/42620152Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1951). The modern system of the arts: A study in the history of aesthetics part I. Journal of the History of Ideas, 12(4), 496–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, J. (2014). Dewey’s rejection of the emotion/expression distinction. In Solymosi, T. & Shook, J. R. (Eds.), Neuroscience, neurophilosophy and pragmatism. New directions in philosophy and cognitive science (pp. 140–161). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376077_7Google Scholar
Krukar, J., & Dalton, R. C. (2020). How the visitors’ cognitive engagement is driven (but not dictated) by the visibility and co-visibility of art exhibits. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubler, G. (1962/2008). The shape of time: Remarks on the history of things. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kubler, G. (1979). Towards a reductive theory of visual style. In Lang, B. (Ed.), The concept of style (Revised and Expanded ed., pp. 163–173). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kubler, G. (1982). The shape of time reconsidered. Perspecta, 19, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1567055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed. with post-script). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kühnapfel, C., Fingerhut, J., Brinkmann, H., Ganster, V., Tanaka, T., Specker, E., Mikuni, J., Güldenpfennig, F., Gartus, A., Rosenberg, R., & Pelowski, M. (2024). How do we move in front of art? How does this relate to art experience? Linking movement, eye tracking, emotion, and evaluations in a gallery-like setting. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 42(1), 86–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374231160000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühnapfel, C., Fingerhut, J., & Pelowski, M. (2023). The role of the body in the experience of installation art: A case study of visitors’ bodily, emotional, and transformative experiences in Tomás Saraceno’s “in orbit”. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1192689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192689CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulka, T. (2015). Kitsch and art. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kunnen, E. S., & Bosma, H. A. (2000). Development of meaning making: A dynamic systems approach. New Ideas in Psychology, 18(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00037-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunnen, E. S., Bosma, H. A., & van Geert, P. L. (2001). A dynamic systems approach to identity formation: Theoretical background and methodological possibilities. In Nurmi, J.-E. (Ed.), Navigating through adolescence: European perspectives (pp. 251–278). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203823033-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupers, E., Lehmann-Wermser, A., McPherson, G., & van Geert, P. (2019). Children’s creativity: A theoretical framework and systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318815707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupers, E., Van Dijk, M., & Lehmann-Wermser, A. (2018). Creativity in the here and now: A generic, micro-developmental measure of creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2095. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuspit, D. B. (1996). The short, happy life of the work of art. From Artifact to art to artyfact. In Kuspit, D. (Ed.), Idiosyncratic identities artists at the end of the Avant-Garde. (pp. 48–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuspit, D. (2023). Memorable Epiphanies: Mitchell Johnson’s Paintings. Whitehot Magazine. https://whitehotmagazine.com/articles/s-paintings-by-donald-kuspit/6138Google Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2014). Creativity and psychopathology. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet. https://core.ac.uk/reader/70340950Google Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2015). Creativity and mental illness: The mad genius in question. London: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137345813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladyman, J., & Wiesner, K. (2020). What is a complex system? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lamarque, P. (2010). Work and object: Explorations in the metaphysics of art. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577460.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, P. A. (2020). The order-chaos dynamic of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 32(4), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1821562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamqaddam, H., Brosens, K., Truyen, F., Beerens, R. J., De Prekel, I., & Verbert, K. (2018). When the tech kids are running too fast: Data visualisation through the lens of art history research. In 3rd Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities at IEEEVIS, Berlin. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/524980Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Laughlin, R. B. (2005). A different universe: Reinventing physics from the bottom down. New York: Basic Books (AZ).Google Scholar
LeBlanc, A., & Sheppard, S. (2022). Women artists: Gender, ethnicity, origin and contemporary prices. Journal of Cultural Economics, 46, 439–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-021-09431-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecoutre, A., Negrevergne, B., & Yger, F. (2017). Recognizing art style automatically in painting with deep learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR), 77, 327–342. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v77/lecoutre17a.htmlGoogle Scholar
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode – Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B., Seo, M. K., Kim, D., Shin, I. S., Schich, M., Jeong, H., & Han, S. K. (2020). Dissecting landscape art history with information theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(43), 26580–26590. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011927117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. (2015). The art and politics of artists’ personas: The case of Yayoi Kusama. Persona Studies, 1(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.21153/ps2015vol1no1art422Google Scholar
Legare, C. H., & Nielsen, M. (2020). Ritual explained: Interdisciplinary answers to Tinbergen’s four questions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1805), 20190419. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehikoinen, K., Pässilä, A., & Owens, A. (2021). Conflicting professional identities for artists in transprofessional contexts: Insights from a pilot programme initiating artistic interventions in organisations. In Westerlund, H. & Gaunt, H. (Eds.), Expanding professionalism in music and higher music education: A changing game (pp. 74–88). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003108337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, D. S. (2022). Neuroscience of emotion, cognition, and decision making: A review. Medical Research Archives, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v10i7.2869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, J. (1987). Review of the art circle, by G. Dickie. The Philosophical Review, 96(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, J. (2002). The irreducible historicality of the concept of art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 42(4), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.4.367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, G., Lilley, S., & Kavanagh, D. (2006). The end of the shock of the new. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00380.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, M., Gayo, E. M., Latorre, C., Santoro, C. M., Estay, S. A., Cañellas-Boltà, N., … & Chr. Stenseth, N. (2020). Ecology of the collapse of Rapa Nui society. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287(1929), 20200662. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0662Google ScholarPubMed
Lind, M. (2007). The collaborative turn. In Billing, J., Lind, M., & Nilson, L. (Eds.), Taking the matter into common hands. On contemporary art and collaborative practices (pp. 15–31). London: Black Dog Publishing.Google Scholar
Litchfield, R., Gilson, L., & Shalley, C. (2017). Can teams have a creative personality? In Feist, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 354–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Lughofer, E., & Zeng, X. (2017). Toward model building for visual aesthetic perception. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2017, 1292801. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1292801CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, L., Dehmamy, N., Chown, J., Giles, C. L., & Wang, D. (2021). Understanding the onset of hot streaks across artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. Nature Communications, 12(1), 5392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25477-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longworth, F., & Scarantino, A. (2010). The disjunctive theory of art: The cluster account reformulated. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 50(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayq001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, A. M., & Tenreiro Machado, J. A. (2019). Complexity analysis of Escher’s art. Entropy, 21(6), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21060553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, D. M. (2014). Beyond art. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591558.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, D. M. (2018). Being for beauty: Aesthetic agency and value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D., Strogatz, S. H., & Tria, F. (2016). Dynamics on expanding spaces: Modeling the emergence of novelties. In Degli Esposti, M., Altmann, E. G., & Pachet, F. (Eds.), Creativity and universality in language (pp. 59–83). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24403-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowie, W. M., & Verspoor, M. H. (2019). Individual differences and the ergodicity problem. Language Learning, 69(S1), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lü, J., Leung, H., & Chen, G. (2004). Complex dynamical networks: Modelling, synchronization and control. Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems Series B: Applications and Algorithms, 11, 70–77Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2000). Art as a social system. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (First German edition published in 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luppi, A. I., Mediano, P. A., Rosas, F. E., Holland, N., Fryer, T. D., O’Brien, J. T., … & Stamatakis, E. A. (2022). A synergistic core for human brain evolution and cognition. Nature Neuroscience, 25(6), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01070-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace, M. A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maclagan, D. (2010). Outsider art: From the margins to the marketplace. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
MacNeill, K., Lye, J., McQuilten, G., Badham, M., & Powell, C. (2022). The incomes of visual artists: Which artists, what income? Australian Economic Review, 55(4), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maertz, G. (2019). Nostalgia for the future: Modernism and heterogeneity in the visual arts of Nazi Germany. Stuttgart: Ibidem Press.Google Scholar
Maet, F. (2013). About the destruction, continuation, and transformation of art. Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(3), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2243Google Scholar
Magnus, P. D., & Mag Uidhir, C. (2022). Art concept pluralism undermines the definitional project. British Journal of Aesthetics, 62(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayab040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mag Uidhir, C., & Magnus, P. D. (2011). Art concept pluralism. Metaphilosophy, 42, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01678.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainzer, K. (2007). Complex systems and the evolution of life. In Klaus, M. (Ed.), Thinking in complexity. The computational dynamics of matter mind and mankind (pp. 87–121). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, M. (1965). Family resemblances and generalization concerning the arts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(3), 219–228. www.jstor.org/stable/20009169Google Scholar
Margolis, J. (1974). Works of art as physically embodied and culturally emergent entities. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 14(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/14.3.187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markey-Towler, B. (2018). Antifragility, the Black Swan and psychology: A psychological theory of adaptability in evolutionary economies. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 15(2), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-018-0097-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Mekler, G., Martínez, R. A., del Río, M. B., Mansilla, R., Miramontes, P., & Cocho, G. (2009). Universality of rank-ordering distributions in the arts and sciences. PLoS One, 4(3), e4791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marwan, N., & Kraemer, K. H. (2023). Trends in recurrence analysis of dynamical systems. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 232, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00739-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965 (pp. 59–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171434.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M., Lawton, J. H., & Stork, N. E. (1995). Assessing extinction rates. In Lawton, J. H. & May, R. M. (Eds.), Extinction rates (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198548294.003.0001Google Scholar
Mayer, R., & Sheehan, S. (1991). The artist’s handbook of materials and techniques: Fifth edition, revised and updated. New York: Viking/Penguin.Google Scholar
McNiff, S. A. (1977). Motivation in art. Art Psychotherapy, 4(3–4), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-9092(77)90028-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meirelles, I., Schich, M., & Malina, R. F. (2017). Arts and humanities, complex network analysis of. In Alhajj, R. & Rokne, J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining (pp. 56–60). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_28-1Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2019). What are aesthetic emotions? Psychological Review, 126(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, S. (2011). The self as a complex dynamic system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.1.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbrath, C. (1998). Patterns of artistic development in children: Comparative studies of talent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milbrath, C., & Lightfoot, C. (Eds.). (2009). Art and human development. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415965545Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
Minissale, G. (2013). The psychology of contemporary art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minneapolis Institute of Arts. (1973). Fakes and Forgeries. https://archive.org/stream/FakesAndForgeriesArtEbook/Fakes%20and%20Forgeries%20(Art%20Ebook)_djvu.txtGoogle Scholar
Mneimne, M., Emery, L., Furr, R. M., & Fleeson, W. (2021). Symptoms as rapidly fluctuating over time: Revealing the close psychological interconnections among borderline personality disorder symptoms via within-person structures. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130(3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000656CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montias, J. M. (2002). Art at auction in 17th century Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053565919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, M. (2012). Darger’s resources. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravec, M. (2017). Network analysis and feminist artists. Artl@ s Bulletin, 6(3), 5. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/artlas/vol6/iss3/5/Google Scholar
Moro Abadía, O., & Morales, M. R. G. (2013). Paleolithic art: A cultural history. Journal of Archaeological Research, 21, 269–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-012-9063-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro Abadía, O., & Porr, M. (Eds.). (2021). Ontologies of rock art: Images, relational approaches, and indigenous knowledges (1st ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321863Google Scholar
Morowitz, H. J. (2004). The emergence of everything: How the world became complex. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morphy, H., & Perkins, M. (2006). The anthropology of art: A reflection on its history and contemporary practice. In Morphy, H. & Perkins, M. (Eds.), The anthropology of art: A reader (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mostowlansky, T., & Rota, A. (2020). Emic and etic. In Stein, F. (Ed.), The open encyclopedia of anthropology. Facsimile of the first edition in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. http://doi.org/10.29164/20emiceticCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, C., & Dörnyei, Z. (2013). Directed motivational currents: Using vision to create effective motivational pathways. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.3.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, A. (2010). From image to interaction: Meaning and agency in the arts. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Google Scholar
Muñiz, A. M. Jr, Norris, T., & Fine, G. A. (2014). Marketing artistic careers: Pablo Picasso as brand manager. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2011-0019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C. (2009). The link between artistic creativity and psychopathology: Salvador Dalí. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(8), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muth, C., & Carbon, C. C. (2013). The aesthetic aha: On the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muth, C., & Carbon, C. C. (2016). SeIns: Semantic instability in art. Art & Perception, 4(1–2), 145–184. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muth, C., & Carbon, C. C. (2019). When art is not mastered but creates Insights. Shifting in and out of Semantic Instability. Art & Perception, 7(2–3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-20191118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muth, C., & Carbon, C. C. (2024). Predicting instabilities: An embodied perspective on unstable experiences with art and design. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 379(1895), 20220416. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0416Google ScholarPubMed
Muth, C., Raab, M. H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2015). The stream of experience when watching artistic movies. Dynamic aesthetic effects revealed by the Continuous Evaluation Procedure (CEP). Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadel, D., Danin, A., Power, R. C., Rosen, A. M., Bocquentin, F., Tsatskin, A., Rosenberg, D., Yeshurun, R., Weissbrod, L., Rebollo, N. R., Barzilai, O., & Boaretto, E. (2013). Earliest floral grave lining from 13,700–11,700-y-old Natufian burials at Raqefet Cave, Mt. Carmel, Israel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(29), 11774–11778. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302277110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanay, B. (2018). George Kubler and the biological metaphor of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 58(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayy034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näslund Dahlgren, A., & Wasielewski, A. (2020). Cultures of digitization: A historiographic perspective on digital art history. Visual Resources, 36(4), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2021.1928864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, C. (2019). Practice and theory in the Italian Renaissance Workshop. In Neilson, C. (Ed.), Practice and theory in the Italian Renaissance Workshop: Verrocchio and the epistemology of making art (pp. i–ii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, A., Alexander, B., & Neumann, F. (2020). Evolutionary image transition and painting using random walks. Evolutionary Computation, 28(4), 643–675. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco_a_00270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newall, M. (2018). A philosophy of the art school (1st ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, K. M., Liu, Y.-T., & Mayer-Kress, G. (2001). Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychological Review, 108(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, K. M., Liu, Y. T., & Mayer-Kress, G. (2003). A dynamical systems interpretation of epigenetic landscapes for infant motor development. Infant Behavior and Development, 26(4), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M. (2018). Networks (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805090.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, D. J., & Dupré, J. (Eds.). (2018). Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nochlin, L. (1988). Women, art, and power and other essays. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429502996Google Scholar
Nolen, W. A., van Meekeren, E., Voskuil, P., & van Tilburg, W. (2020). New vision on the mental problems of Vincent van Gogh; results from a bottom-up approach using (semi-)structured diagnostic interviews. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 8, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-00196-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, F. C., & Natividade, J. C. (2023). The sexual selection of creativity: A nomological approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 874261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nummenmaa, L., & Hari, R. (2023). Bodily feelings and aesthetic experience of art. Cognition & Emotion, 37(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2023.2183180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Boyle, E. Jr, & Aguinis, H. (2012). The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psychology, 65, 79–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01239.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obrist, H. U. (2005). Science and art: A conversation with Ilya Prigogine. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 28(2), 115–128.Google Scholar
O’Byrne, J., & Jerbi, K. (2022). How critical is brain criticality? Trends in Neurosciences, 45(11), 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.08.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oesterdiekhoff, G. W. (2021). Different developmental stages and developmental ages of humans in history: Culture and socialization, open and closed developmental windows, and advanced and arrested development. The American Journal of Psychology, 134(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.134.2.0217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oesterdiekhoff, G. W. (2023). Civilization theory and structural-genetic theory programme: Two fundamental theories in comparison. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 57(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09718-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Keeffe, K. P., Hong, H., & Strogatz, S. H. (2017). Oscillators that sync and swarm. Nature Communications, 8, 1504–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01190-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oleynick, V. C., DeYoung, C. G., Hyde, E., Kaufman, S. B., Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2017). Openness/intellect: The core of the creative personality. In Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 9–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleynick, V. C., Thrash, T. M., LeFew, M. C., Moldovan, E. G., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00436CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olive-Tomas, A., & Harmeling, S. S. (2020). The rise of art movements: An effectual process model of Picasso’s and Braque’s give-and-take during the creation of Cubism (1908–1914). Small Business Economics, 54, 819–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00154-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öztürk, O., Gazi, X., & Bowker, S. (Eds.). (2022). Deconstructing the myths of Islamic art. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003170525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pack, A., & Kiss, T. (2022). A visual model of L2 motivation as a complex dynamic system. ELT Journal, 77(4), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The problem of emergence. In Padgett, J. F. & Powell, W. W. (Eds.), The emergence of organizations and markets (pp. 1–29). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691148670.003.0001Google Scholar
Palacio-Pérez, E. (2013). The origins of the concept of “Palaeolithic Art”: Theoretical roots of an idea. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20(4), 682–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9135-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papi, M., & Hiver, P. (2020). Language learning motivation as a complex dynamic system: A global perspective of truth, control, and value. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, N. (2020). Plato’s aesthetics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/plato-aesthetics/Google Scholar
Park, J., Cho, C. H., & Lee, J. W. (2022). A perspective on complex networks in the stock market. Frontiers in Physics, 10, 1329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.1097489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, C. (2016). A companion to digital art. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelowski, M., & Akiba, F. (2011). A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelowski, M., Graser, A., Specker, E., Forster, M., von Hinüber, J., & Leder, H. (2019). Does gallery lighting really have an impact on appreciation of art? An ecologically valid study of lighting changes and the assessment and emotional experience with representational and abstract paintings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02148CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Lauring, J. O., & Leder, H. (2016). Visualizing the impact of art: An update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penner, H. H. (2023). Ritual. Encyclopedia Britannica, December 11. www.britannica.com/topic/ritualGoogle Scholar
Pennisi, P., Giallongo, L., Milintenda, G., & Cannarozzo, M. (2021). Autism, autistic traits and creativity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cognitive Processing, 22, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Perc, M. (2020). Beauty in artistic expressions through the eyes of networks and physics. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 17(164), 20190686. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0686CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlovsky, L. (2014). Aesthetic emotions, what are their cognitive functions? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 98. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00098CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pessoa, L. (2022). The entangled brain: How perception, cognition, and emotion are woven together. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14636.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J., & Roose, H. (2022). The Matthew effect in art funding. How reputation affects an artist’s chances of receiving government support. Poetics, 92, 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, A. M., Jung, W., Yang, J., & Stanley, H. E. (2011). Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016733108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrides, L., & Fernandes, A. (2020). The successful visual artist: The building blocks of artistic careers model. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 50(6), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2020.1845892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipsen, C. (2023). Emil Nolde: Mythos und Wirklichkeit: Die Ungemalten Bilder. Quedlinburg: Museum Lyonel Feininger.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (2013). The construction of reality in the child (Vol. 82). London: Routledge. (Originally published in 1937). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piano, E. E., & Al-Bawwab, R. (2021). The artist as entrepreneur. The Review of Austrian Economics, 36, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-021-00547-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 213–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.013Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2009). Is art modern? Kristeller’s ‘modern system of the arts’ reconsidered. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayn054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preziosi, D., & Farago, C. (2012). Art is not what you think it is (Vol. 60). New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444354300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (1998). What is so bad about contradictions? The Journal of Philosophy, 95(8), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2018a). Buddhist dependence. In Bliss, R. & Priest, G. (Eds.), Reality and its Structure: Essays in fundamentality (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755630.003.0007Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2018b). The fifth corner of four: An essay on Buddhist Metaphysics and the Catuskoti. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198758716.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (2018). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books. (Originally published in 1978).Google Scholar
Prinz, A., Piening, J., & Ehrmann, T. (2015). The success of art galleries: A dynamic model with competition and information effects. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-014-9217-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: How Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world – And us. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Pufall, P. B. (1997). Framing a developmental psychology of art. Human Development, 40(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000278719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulie, E. (2015). The end of art and contemporary practice. Doctoral thesis, Sydney College of the Arts, Sydney. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/14910Google Scholar
Pulie, E. (2022). Crisis of the contemporary. In Bru, S., Kangaslahti, K., Lin, L., Slavkova, I., & Ayers, D. (Eds.), Crisis: The Avant-Garde and modernism in critical modes (pp. 521–536). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110773637-025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qyll, N. (2020). Persona as key component in (cultural) person branding. Persona Studies, 6(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.21153/psj2020vol6no1art941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampley, M. (2009). Art as a social system: The sociological aesthetics of Niklas Luhmann. Telos, 148, 111–140. https://doi.org/10.3817/0909148111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampley, M. (2017). The seductions of Darwin: Art, evolution, neuroscience. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271079028Google Scholar
Rancière, J. (2012). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible, Translated by Rockhill, G.. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350284913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, S. (Ed.). (2024). Oxford essential quotations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191826719.001.0001/q-oro-ed4-00006380Google Scholar
Read, H. (1960). Art now: An introduction to the theory of modern painting and sculpture. London: Faber & Faber. (Originally published in 1933).Google Scholar
Renz, S., & Tissen, V. (2021), LinkedArt: Exploring network analysis in art history. Digital Humanities Lab, February 24. https://dhlab.hypotheses.org/?p=1867Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1996). Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, N. (2000). Process philosophy: A survey of basic Issues. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://upittpress.org/books/9780822961284/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Y. (2017). Workshop as network: A case study from Mughal South Asia. Artl@s Bulletin, 6(3), Article 4.Google Scholar
Richards, R. A. (2019). The biology of art (Elements in the Philosophy of Biology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108672078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. A. (2022). Naturalized aesthetics: A scientific framework for the philosophy of art. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003007029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M., Dale, R., & Marsh, K. (2014). Complex dynamical systems in social and personality psychology: Theory, modeling, and analysis. In Reis, H. & Judd, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–282). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996481.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances, Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggle, N. A. (2010). Street art: The transfiguration of the commonplaces. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 68(3), 243–257. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2010.01416.xGoogle Scholar
Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (2020). Aesthetic emotions. The Monist, 103(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onz036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, R., Commins, S., & Farina, F. (2018). Why science needs art: From historical to modern day perspectives. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315660745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodner, V. L., & Thomson, E. (2013). The art machine: Dynamics of a value generating mechanism for contemporary art. Arts Marketing: An International Journal (currently published as Arts and the Market), 3(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/20442081311327165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, T. (2016). The end of average: How to succeed in a world that values sameness. London: Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. (1981). The economics of superstars. The American Economic Review, 71, 845–858Google Scholar
Rothenberg, D. (2012). Survival of the beautiful: Art, science, and evolution. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Rowland, I. D., & Charney, N. (2017). The collector of lives: Giorgio Vasari and the invention of art (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Roy, D. D. (1996). Personality model of fine artists. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0904_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruan, Q. (2023). The connection with science and renaissance art. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 11, 144–148. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v11i.7539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, G. (2023). The symbolic economy of the Nobel Prize in literature: How it counters or reproduces modes of domination. Poetics, 101, 101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargentis, G., Dimitriadis, P., Iliopoulou, T., & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2021). A stochastic view of varying styles in art paintings. Heritage, 4(1), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4010021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, D., & Heckhausen, H. (2008). Trait theories of motivation. In Heckhausen, J. & Heckhausen, H. (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 42–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499821.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidt, S., Gelhard, C., & Henseler, J. (2020). Old practice, but young research field: A systematic bibliographic review of personal branding. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1809. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherr, M. (2022). The invention of “outsider art”: Experiencing practices of othering in contemporary art worlds in the UK. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839462508Google Scholar
Schich, M., Song, C., Ahn, Y. Y., Mirsky, A., Martino, M., Barabási, A. L., & Helbing, D. (2014). A network framework of cultural history. Science, 345(6196), 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schinkel, W. (2010). The autopoiesis of the artworld after the end of art. Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975510368476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, J. (2012). The insanity hoax: Exposing the myth of the mad genius. Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Shrinktunes Media.Google Scholar
Schubert, E. (2021). Creativity is optimal novelty and maximal positive affect: A new definition based on the spreading activation model. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 612379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.612379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuldberg, D., & Guisinger, S. (2021). Creativity and nonlinear dynamical systems. Journal of Creativity, 31, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulman, L. S. (2021). When things grow many: Complexity, universality and emergence in nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, W. T. (2022). The mind of the artist: Personality and the drive to create. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197611098.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. J., Luyckx, K., & Vignoles, V. L. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of identity theory and research. New York: Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibt, J. (2018a). Ontological tools for the process turn in biology. In Nicholson, D. J. & Dupré, J. (Eds.), Everything flows: Towards a Processual philosophy of biology (pp. 113–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.003.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibt, J. (2018b). What is a process? Modes of occurrence and forms of dynamicity in general process theory. In Stout, R. (Ed.), Process, action, and experience (pp. 120–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seibt, J. (2020). Process philosophy. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/process-philosophy/Google Scholar
Șerban, O. (2023). After Thomas Kuhn: The structure of aesthetic revolutions. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110774696Google Scholar
Sevänen, E. (2001). Art as an autopoietic sub-system of modern society: A critical analysis of the concepts of art and autopoietic systems in Luhmann’s late production. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, R. (2019). Artification as process. Cultural Sociology, 13(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975519854955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavinina, L. V. (2010). What does research on child prodigies tell us about talent development and expertise acquisition? Talent Development and Excellence, 29(2), 29–49.Google Scholar
Shiner, L. (2001). The invention of art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226753416.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiner, L. (2009). Continuity and discontinuity in the concept of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayp006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiner, L. (2012). “Blurred boundaries”? Rethinking the concept of craft and its relation to art and design. Philosophy Compass, 7(4), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00479.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, L., & Moriuchi, M.-Y. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge companion to art and activism in the twenty-first century. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shnayerson, M. (2019). Boom: Mad money, mega dealers, and the rise of contemporary art. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Shusterman, R. (1999). Somaesthetics: A disciplinary proposal. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/432196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shusterman, R. (2000). Performing live: Aesthetic alternatives for the ends of art. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501718168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shusterman, R. (2008). Art and religion. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 42(3), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siderits, M. (2021). How things are: An introduction to Buddhist Metaphysics (Online ed.). New York: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197606902.001.0001Google Scholar
Sigaki, H. Y., Perc, M., & Ribeiro, H. V. (2018). History of art paintings through the lens of entropy and complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(37), E8585–E8594. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800083115Google ScholarPubMed
Silva, J. M., Pratas, D., Antunes, R., Matos, S., & Pinho, A. J. (2021). Automatic analysis of artistic paintings using information-based measures. Pattern Recognition, 114, 107864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simoniti, V. (2017). Aesthetic properties as powers. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), 1434–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simoniti, V. (2018). Assessing socially engaged art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 76(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simoniti, V. (2021). Art as political discourse. British Journal of Aesthetics, 61(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayab018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1004_4Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Can creative productivity be both positively and negatively correlated with psychopathology? Yes! Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 455. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2014b). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614543973CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2017). The genetic side of giftedness: A nature-nurture definition and a fourfold talent typology. In Plucker, J. A., Rinn, A. N., & Makel, M. C. (Eds.), From giftedness to gifted education: Reflecting theory in practice (pp. 335–352). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003235262Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2023). The blind-variation and selective-retention theory of creativity: Recent developments and current status of BVSR, Creativity Research Journal, 35(3), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2059919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloane, K. D., & Sosniak, L. A. (1985). The development of accomplished sculptors. In Bloom, B. J. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 90–138). New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. (2016). Explanations for adaptations, just‐so stories, and limitations on evidence in evolutionary biology. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 25(6), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, T. (2008). Introduction: The contemporaneity question. In Enwezor, O., Condee, N., & Smith, T. (Eds.), Antinomies of art and culture: Modernity, postmodernity, contemporaneity (pp. 1–20). New York: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822389330-004Google Scholar
Smith, T. (2009). What is contemporary art? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. (2018). Biennials and the global work of art. Art Journal, 77, 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2018.1530014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, D. H., Brinberg, M., Bodie, G. D., Jones, S., & Ram, N. (2021), A dynamic dyadic systems approach to interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 1001–1026. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solso, R. L. (2003). The psychology of art and the evolution of the conscious brain. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5673.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosis, R. (2020). The last Talmudic demon? The role of ritual in cultural transmission. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B., 375, 20190425. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sosniak, L. A. (1985). Learning to be a concert pianist. In Bloom, B. J. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 19–67). New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Sosniak, L. A. (1990). The tortoise, the hare, and the development of talent. In Howe, M. J. A. (Ed.), Encouraging the development of exceptional skills and talents (pp. 165–178). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Spears, R. (2021). Social influence and group identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-070620-111818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperry, S. H., Sharpe, B. M., & Wright, A. G. C. (2021). Momentary dynamics of emotion-based impulsivity: Exploring associations with dispositional measures of externalizing and internalizing psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130(8), 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000720CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasa Desikan, B., Shimao, H., & Miton, H. (2022). WikiArtVectors: Style and color representations of artworks for cultural analysis via information theoretic measures. Entropy, 24(9), 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24091175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staff, C. (2013). After modernist painting. The history of a contemporary practice. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, G. G. (2023). Just in time: Temporality, aesthetic experience, and cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stecker, R. (1998). Artworks: Definition, meaning, value. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Stecker, R. (2000). Is it reasonable to attempt to define art? In Carroll, N. (Ed.), Theories of art today (pp. 45–64). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stecker, R. (2010). Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: An introduction (2nd ed.) New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Steele, L. M. (2019). Temporal dynamics of creativity and motivation: What we know, what we do not, and a few suggestions for filling the gap. In Mumford, M. D. & Todd, E. M. (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizations (pp. 105–137). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315192598-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, L. M., McIntosh, T., & Higgs, C. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and creativity: Opening up a black box. In Mumford, M. D. & Hemlin, S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on leadership and creativity (pp. 100–130). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715465.00013Google Scholar
Steenbeek, H. W., & van Geert, P. L. (2007). A theory and dynamic model of dyadic interaction: Concerns, appraisals, and contagiousness in a developmental context. Developmental Review, 27(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, W. (2002). Venus in exile: The rejection of beauty in twentieth-century art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2004). The self in cultural-historical activity theory: Reclaiming the unity of social and individual dimensions of human development. Theory & Psychology, 14(4), 475–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304044921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014601.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyaert, G., Postec, M., Sanyova, J., & Dubois, H. (2021). The Ghent Altarpiece: Research and conservation of the interior: The lower register. Brussels: Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8732969Google Scholar
Straiotto, B. G., Marwan, N., James, D. C., & Seeley, D. C. (2023). Recurrence analysis discriminates martial art movement patterns. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 232(1), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00684-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, S. H. (2012). Sync: How order emerges from chaos in the universe, nature, and daily life. London: Hachette UK.Google Scholar
Sullivan, G. (Ed.). (2010). Art practice as research: Inquiry in visual arts. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Summers, D. (2003). Real spaces: Art history and the rise of Western Modernism. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Szubielska, M., & Imbir, K. (2022). The aesthetic experience of contemporary installations in an art gallery and a laboratory setting: The issue of interactivity. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0360-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadić, B., & Melnik, R. (2021). Self-organised critical dynamics as a key to fundamental features of complexity in physical, biological, and social networks. Dynamics, 1(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics1020011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tafreshi, D. (2022). Adolphe Quetelet and the legacy of the “average man” in psychology. History of Psychology, 25(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. L. (2017). Creativity and mood disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1040–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699653CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, R. P. (2002). Order in Pollock’s chaos. Scientific American, 287(6), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1202-116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thain, M. (2020). Aesthetic perception and embodied cognition: Art and literature at the Fin de Siècle. In Anderson, M., Garratt, P., & Sprevak, M. (Eds.), Distributed cognition in Victorian culture and modernism (pp. 79–94). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442244.003.0005Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The National Endowment for the Arts. (2019). Artists and other cultural workers: A statistical portrait. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/Artists_and_Other_Cultural_Workers.pdfGoogle Scholar
Thodos, D. (2009). Donald Kuspit Interview with Diane Thodos – New York City, April 29, 2009 – Parts 1 & 2. www.dianethodos.com/post/an-interview-with-donald-kuspit-by-diane-thodos-new-york-city-april-29-2009-parts-1-2Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (2010). The $12 million stuffed shark: The curious economics of contemporary art. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin (Macmillan).Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (2014). The Supermodel and the Brillo Box: Back stories and peculiar economics from the world of contemporary art. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (2018). The orange balloon dog: Bubbles, turmoil and avarice in the contemporary art market. London: Aurum.Google Scholar
Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2004). Inspiration: Core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 957–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.957CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., Cassidy, S. E., Fryer, J. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017907CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thrash, T. M., Moldovan, E. G., Oleynick, V. C., & Maruskin, L. A. (2014). The psychology of inspiration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thys, E., Sabbe, B., & De Hert, M. (2014). Creativity and psychopathology: A systematic review. Psychopathology, 47(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357822CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinio, P. P. L. (2013). From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognoli, E., & Kelso, J. A. (2014). The metastable brain. Neuron, 81(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tognoli, E., Zhang, M., Fuchs, A., Beetle, C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2020). Coordination dynamics: A foundation for understanding social behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomiuc, A. (2015). Branding in the art world: The contemporary visual artist. Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media, 8(22), 3–13.Google Scholar
Topaz, C. M., Higdon, J., Epps-Darling, A., Siau, E., Kerkhoff, H., Mendiratta, S., & Young, E. (2022). Race- and gender-based under-representation of creative contributors: Art, fashion, film, and music. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 221. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01239-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsley, J. (2010). Moments of repetition in the process of art production: Temporalities, labour, appropriations and authorship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom. http://hdl.handle.net/10034/126694Google Scholar
Tria, F., Crimaldi, I, Aletti, G., & Servedio, V. (2020). Taylor’s law in innovation processes. Entropy, 22(5), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tria, F., Loreto, V., & Servedio, V. D. (2018). Zipf’s, Heaps’ and Taylor’s laws are determined by the expansion into the adjacent possible. Entropy, 20(10), 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20100752CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinkaus, E., & Buzhilova, A. P. (2018). Diversity and differential disposal of the dead at Sunghir. Antiquity, 92(361), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripps, J. (2012). The Mechanical Presentations of Marian Statues in the Late Gothic Period. https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/2106/1/Tripps_The_mechanical_presentations_of_Marian_Statues_2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tripps, J. (2018). Silent Assistants. The “Wolfram” Candelabra in the Erfurt Cathedral in the Context of the 12th and 13th Centuries. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/185515723.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tröndle, M., & Tschacher, W. (2012). The physiology of phenomenology: The effects of artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 30(1), 75–113. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.30.1.gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007). Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2023). A complexity science account of humor. Entropy, 25(2), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschacher, W., Schiepek, G., & Brunner, E. J. (Eds.). (2012). Self-organization and clinical psychology: Empirical approaches to synergetics in psychology (Vol. 58). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77534-5Google Scholar
Tschacher, W., & Tröndle, M. (2011). A dynamic systems perspective on fine art and its market. Futures, 43(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. (Ed.). (2006). The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306361.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504. https://doi.org/10.1086/432782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. (2014). A note on Denis Dutton’s concept of art. Florida Philosophical Review, 14(1), 14. https://cah.ucf.edu/fpr/article/a-note-on-denis-duttons-concept-of-art/Google Scholar
Vallacher, R., & Wegner, D. (2012). Action identification theory. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 327–348). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Cruys, S., Frascaroli, J., & Friston, K. (2024). Order and change in art: Towards an active inference account of aesthetic experience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1895), 20220411. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Rijt, A., Kang, S. M., Restivo, M., & Patil, A. (2014). Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(19), 6934–6939. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1316836111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113(4), 842. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Der Maas, H. L. J., Kan, K. J., Marsman, M., & Stevenson, C. E. (2017). Network models for cognitive development and intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 5(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Maas, H. L. J., Kolstein, R., & van der Pligt, J. (2003). Sudden transitions in attitudes. Sociological Methods and Research, 32, 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103253773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 99, 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1996). Catastrophe analysis of discontinuous development. In Clogg, C. C., & von Eye, A. A. (Eds.), Categorical variables in developmental research methods of analysis (pp. 77–105). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P. (1986). The concept of development. In van Geert, P. (Ed.), Theory building in developmental psychology (pp. 3–50). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60004-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P. (1987). The structure of developmental theories. A generative approach. Human Development, 30(3), 160–177. www.jstor.org/stable/26764701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development. Change between complexity and chaos. London: Harvester.Google Scholar
Van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105(4), 634. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.634-677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P. (2009). Transmission, self-organization, and the emergence of language: A dynamic systems point of view. In Schonpflug, U. (Ed.), Cultural transmission: Psychological, developmental, social, and methodological aspects (pp. 48–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Geert, P. (2023). Some thoughts on dynamic systems modeling of L2 learning. Frontiers of Physics, 11, 1186136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1186136Google Scholar
Van Geert, P., & De Ruiter, N. (2022). Toward a process approach in psychology: Stepping into Heraclitus’ river. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2013). (P)(re)presentations: What are they and how do they develop? Cognitive Development, 28(2), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lange, P. A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2012). Handbook of theories of social psychology. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Maanen, H. (2009). How to study art worlds: On the societal functioning of aesthetic values. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n0p3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Saaze, V. E. J. P. (2009). Doing artworks. A study into the presentation and conservation of installation artworks. Doctoral thesis, Maastricht University, Maastricht. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20091217vsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanchurin, V., Wolf, Y. I., Katsnelson, M. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2022). Toward a theory of evolution as multilevel learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(6), e2120037119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120037119Google Scholar
Vandiver, P. B., Soffer, O., Klima, B., & Svoboda, J. (1989). The origins of ceramic technology at Dolni Věstonice, Czechoslovakia. Science, 246(4933), 1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.246.4933.1002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varella, M. A. C. (2021). Evolved features of artistic motivation: Analyzing a Brazilian database spanning three decades. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 5663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769915CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasari, G. (1550/1998). The lives of the artists, Translated with an introduction and notes by Conaway Bondanella, J. & Bondanella, P.. Oxford: Oxford’s World Classics.Google Scholar
Veras, E. F. (2018). Interviews with artists: A virgin patch of fertile content. PORTO ARTE: Revista De Artes Visuais (Qualis A2), 22(37), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.22456/2179-8001.80131Google Scholar
Visser-Rotgans, R. (2018). Veranderend kunstenaarschap. De rol en betekenis van de kunstenaar in participatieve kunstpraktijken (Changing artistry. The role and meaning of the artist in participatory art practices.). Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/66670Google Scholar
Walberg, H. J., Strykowski, B. F., Rovai, E., & Hung, S. S. (1984). Exceptional performance. Review of Educational Research, 54, 87–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054001087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldrop, M. M. (1993). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Walia, C. (2019). A dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, R. J. (2021). Hunters and shamans, sex and death: Relational ontologies and the materiality of the Lascaux “shaft-scene”. In Abadía, Ó. M. & Porr, M. (Eds.), Ontologies of rock art: Images, relational approaches, and indigenous knowledges (pp. 319–334). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, V. (2021). The artist as shaman: The work of Joseph Beuys and Marcus Coates. In Schneider, A. & Wright, C. (Eds.), Between art and anthropology: Contemporary ethnographic practice (pp. 35–47). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003230694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, S., & Morrens, M. (2020). What can be learned from dimensional perspectives on psychiatry? Neuropsychobiology, 79(4–5), 249–250. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508762CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W., Stanley, H. E., & Braunstein, L. A. (2018). Effects of time-delays in the dynamics of social contagions. New Journal of Physics, 20(1), 013034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa9fc8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, T., & Wasserman, L. (2020). Motivation: In Wasserman, T. & Wasserman, L. (Eds.), Motivation, effort, and the neural network model (pp. 93–101). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58724-6_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, N. W., Pruessner, G., Chapman, S. C., Crosby, N. B., & Jensen, H. J. (2016). 25 years of self-organized criticality: Concepts and controversies. Space Science Reviews, 198, 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0155-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D. J. (1999a). Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 493–527. https://doi.org/10.1086/210318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D. J. (1999b). Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weitz, M. (1956). The role of theory in aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/427491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijnberg, N. M., & Gemser, G. (2000). Adding value to innovation: Impressionism and the transformation of the selection system in visual arts. Organization Science, 11(3), 323–329. www.jstor.org/stable/2640265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willette, J. (2010). Hegel, Art and the Dialectical Method. https://web.archive.org/ (search: https://arthistoryunstuffed.com/hegel-art-dialectical-method/)Google Scholar
Williams, L. (2017). The relationship between the creation and perception of art. Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading, Reading, England. https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/75873/Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999). Questioning art education. Circa, 89, 18–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/25563491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winner, E. (2006). Development in the arts: Drawing and music. In Kuhn, D., Siegler, R. S., Damon, W., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 859–904). New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0220Google Scholar
Wise, M. N. (2016). A smoker’s paradigm. In Richards, R. & Daston, L. (Eds.), Kuhn’s ‘structure of scientific revolutions’ at fifty: Reflections on a science classic (pp. 31–41). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226317175.003.0002Google Scholar
Withagen, R., Araújo, D., & de Poel, H. J. (2017). Inviting affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 45, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withagen, R., de Poel, H. J., Araujo, D., & Pepping, G-J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witham, L. (2012). Art schooled: A year among prodigies, rebels, and visionaries at a world-class art college. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Witherington, D. C. (2011). Taking emergence seriously: The centrality of circular causality for dynamic systems approaches to development. Human Development, 54(2), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000326814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittingslow, R. (2023). What art does: Using philosophy of technology to talk about art. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojcik, D. (2016). Outsider art: Visionary worlds and trauma. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Wolf, R. (2020). The artist interview: An elusive history. Journal of Art Historiography, 23, 1–25.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. (1993). Art as ideology. In Wolff, J. (Ed.), The social production of art (pp. 49–70). London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23041-9_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wölfflin, H. (1932/1950). Principles of art history. The problem of the development of style in later art, Translated from 7th German Edition (1929). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. (2015). Art rethought: The social practices of art. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747758.003.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, A. E., Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2016). Intrinsic dynamics of state self-esteem: The role of self-concept clarity. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, S. E., Keith, M. G., Su, R., Saef, R., & Parrigon, S. (2017). The curious dynamic between openness and interests in creativity. In Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 44–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A., & Coan, J. A. (2023). Beyond nature versus nurture: The emergence of emotion. Affective Science, 4(3), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00212-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woronkowicz, J. (2021). Arts, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 45(4), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-021-09432-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (2016). Stability and fluctuation of personality disorder features in daily life. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(5), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wunderlich, S. (2021). Propaganda Des Terrors. Plakate Des NS-Staates Zwischen 1933 und 1945. Propaganda Posters of the Nazi Terror Regime. Berlin: Berlin Story Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Yang, H., & Yang, H. (2021). Evolution of entropy in art painting based on the wavelet transform. Entropy, 23(7), 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23070883CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, P., & Hou, X. (2022). Research on dynamic characteristics of stock market based on big data analysis, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, Article 8758976. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8758976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yevin, I. (1994). The synergetic approach to art theory: Recent investigations. Leonardo, 27(5), 413–415. www.muse.jhu.edu/article/608058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yogev, T. (2010). The social construction of quality: Status dynamics in the market for contemporary art. Socio-Economic Review, 8(3), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yogev, T., & Grund, T. (2012). Network dynamics and market structure: The case of art fairs. Sociological Focus, 45(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2012.630846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaaiman, J. (2016). In monstrous shallows: Pinpointing where the real art of Jeff Koons lies. https://philarchive.org/archive/ZAAIMSGoogle Scholar
Zangwill, N. (2001). The metaphysics of beauty. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangwill, N. (2002). Are there counterexamples to aesthetic theories of art? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6245.00059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarobell, J. (2022). New geographies of the biennial: Networks for the globalization of art. GeoJournal, 87, 2505–2523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10384-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, W., Zhou, D., Qiu, X., & Jiang, W. (2021). Compare the performance of the models in art classification. PLoS One, 16(3), e0248414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248414Google ScholarPubMed
Zickfeld, J. H., Schubert, T. W., Seibt, B., Blomster, J. K., Arriaga, P., Basabe, N., … Fiske, A. P. (2019). Kama muta: Conceptualizing and measuring the experience often labelled being moved across 19 nations and 15 languages. Emotion, 19(3), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zijlmans, K. (2008). The discourse on contemporary art and the globalization of the art system. In Zijlmans, K. & van Damme, W. (Eds.), World art studies: Exploring concepts and approaches (pp. 135–150). Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
Zijlmans, K. (2021). Van kunstgeschiedenis naar World Art Studies: De wereld op zijn kop (From art history to world art studies: The world upside down). Leiden: University of Leiden. www.universiteitleiden.nl/binaries/content/assets/geesteswetenschappen/nieuws/afscheidsrede-kitty-zijlmans-boekje-okt.-2021.pdfGoogle Scholar
Zorloni, A. (2013). The economics of contemporary art markets, strategies, and stardom. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32405-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorloni, A., & Ardizzone, A. (2016). The winner-take-all contemporary art market. Creative Industries Journal, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2016.1154651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwir, I., Del-Val, C., Arnedo, J., Pulkki-Råback, L., Konte, B., Yang, S. S., … & Cloninger, C. R. (2021). Three genetic–environmental networks for human personality. Molecular Psychiatry, 26(8), 3858–3875. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0579-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwir, I., Del-Val, C., Hintsanen, M., Cloninger, K. M., Romero-Zaliz, R., Mesa, A., … & Cloninger, C. R. (2022). Evolution of genetic networks for human creativity. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 354–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01097-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zyga, O., Ivcevic, Z., Hoffmann, J., & Palomera, R. (2022). Developmental trends in creative ability: A cross-sectional examination of figural and verbal domains across the school-age years. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000425CrossRefGoogle Scholar