Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:42:20.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2018

Matei Candea
Matei Candea
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Comparison in Anthropology
The Impossible Method
 , pp. 365 - 384
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. 2001. Chaos of disciplines. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. 2004. Methods of discovery: heuristics for the social sciences. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, L. 1990. Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 5, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Lughod, L. 1991. Writing against culture. In Recapturing anthropology, ed. Fox, R. C., 137–162. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. 2000. Means without end: notes on politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Amundson, R. 1998. Typology reconsidered: two doctrines on the history of evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 13, 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. 2001. The powers of distance: cosmopolitanism and the cultivation of detachment. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 2016. Frameworks of comparison. London Review of Books, 21 January, 15–18.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1988a. Introduction: place and voice in anthropological theory. Cultural Anthropology 3, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1988b. Putting hierarchy in its place. Cultural Anthropology 3, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1994. Posterior analytics (trans. J. Barnes). 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1997. Topics: books I and VIII (trans. R. Smith). 1st edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, T. 1973a. Anthropology and the colonial encounter. New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (ed.) 1973b. Two European images of non-European rule. In Anthropology and the colonial encounter, ed. Asad, T., 103–118. New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (ed.) 1986. The concept of cultural translation in British social anthropology. In Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, ed. Clifford, J.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (ed.) 2003. Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (ed.) 2009a. The idea of an anthropology of Islam. Qui Parle 17, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, T. (ed.) 2009b. Is critique secular? Blasphemy, injury, and free speech. Berkeley: Townsend Center for the Humanities, distributed by University of California Press.Google Scholar
Astuti, R. (ed.) 2007. Questions of anthropology. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. 1934. Le nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Barad, K. M. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1990. The guru and the conjurer: transactions in knowledge and the shaping of culture in southeast Asia and Melanesia. Man n.s. 25, 640–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartha, P. 2013. Analogy and analogical reasoning. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. N. (Fall 2013 edition).Google Scholar
Bashkow, I. 2004. A neo-Boasian conception of cultural boundaries. American Anthropologist 106, 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashkow, I., Bunzl, M., Handler, R., Orta, A. and Rosenblatt, D. 2004. Introduction. American Anthropologist 106, 433–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G. 1967. Review of Person, time, and conduct in Bali: an essay in cultural analysis, by Clifford Geertz. American Anthropologist 69, 765–766.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Bayly, S. 2018. Anthropology and history. In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beckner, M. 1959. The biological way of thought. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, R. 1934. Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Benedict, R. 2005. The chrysanthemum and the sword: patterns of Japanese culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. 2005. Where did anthropology go? Or the need for ‘human nature’. In Essays on cultural transmission, ed. Bloch, M., 1–20. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. and Sperber, D. 2002. Kinship and evolved psychological dispositions: the mother’s brother controversy reconsidered. Current Anthropology 43, 723–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, F. 1896. The limitations of the comparative method of anthropology. Science, 901–908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boas, F. 1938 [1911]. The mind of primitive man. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boon, J. 2009. Other tribes, other scribes: symbolic anthropology in the comparative study of cultures, histories, religions and texts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. 2000. Collected fictions. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Brettell, C. B. 1993. When they read what we write: the politics of ethnography. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Brightman, R. 1995. Forget culture: replacement, transcendence, relexification. Cultural Anthropology 10, 509–546.Google Scholar
Buchanan, I. 1996. What is heterology? New Blackfriars 77, 483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunzl, M. 2004. Boas, Foucault, and the ‘native anthropologist’: notes toward a neo-Boasian anthropology. American Anthropologist 106, 435–442.Google Scholar
Burawoy, M. 2009. The extended case method: four countries, four decades, four great transformations, and one theoretical tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, P. H. 1997. Analysis and science in Aristotle: new essays on auto/biography. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2007. Arbitrary locations: in defence of the bounded field-site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13, 167–184.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2010a. Corsican fragments: difference, knowledge and fieldwork. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2010b. ‘I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat’: engagement and detachment in human–animal relations. American Ethnologist 37, 241–258.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2011. Endo/exo. Common Knowledge 17, 146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, M. 2012. Different species, one theory: reflections on anthropomorphism and anthropological comparison. Cambridge Anthropology 30, 118–135.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2013a. The fieldsite as device. Journal of Cultural Economy 6, 241–258.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2013b. Suspending belief: epoche in animal behavior science. American Anthropologist 115, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, M. 2016a. De deux modalités de la comparaison en anthropologie sociale. L’Homme 218, 183–218.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2016b. We have never been pluralist: on lateral and frontal comparisons in the ontological turn. In Comparative metaphysics: ontology after anthropology, ed. Charbonnier, P., Salmon, G. and Skafish, P.. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2017. This is (not) like that. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7, 517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, M. 2018a. Paradoxical pedagogies: reassembling individual (animal) subjects. In Recovering the human subject, ed. Holbraad, M., Laidlaw, J. and Bodenhorn, B.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2018b. Severed roots: evolutionism, diffusionism and (structural-)functionalism. In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M.. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, M. 2018c. The two faces of character: moral tales of animal behaviour. Social Anthropology 26, 361–375.Google Scholar
Candea, M. 2018d. Going full frontal: Two modalities of comparison in social anthropology. In Regimes of comparatism: Frameworks of comparison in history, religion and Anthropology, ed. R. Gagné, S. Goldhill and G. Lloyd. Sl: Brill.Google Scholar
Carrier, J. G. 1992. Occidentalism: the world turned upside-down. American Ethnologist 19, 195–212.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 2007. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Choy, T. K. 2011. Ecologies of comparison: an ethnography of endangerment in Hong Kong. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, L. and Mathur, N. 2018. Introduction: who are we? In Who are ‘we’? Reimagining alterity and affinity in anthropology, ed. Chua, L and Mathur, N., 1–34. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. 1986. Introduction: partial truths. In Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, ed. Clifford, J and Marcus, G., 1–26. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds.) 1986. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coe, J. 2013. Sinking giggling into the sea. London Review of Books, 18 July, 30–31.Google Scholar
Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. 1795. La logique, ou, Les premiers développement de l’art de penser. Paris: F. Dufart.Google Scholar
Cook, J., Laidlaw, J. and Mair, J. 2009. What if there is no elephant? Towards a conception of an unsited field. Multi-sited ethnography: theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research, ed. M.-A. Falzon, 47–72. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corsín Jiménez, A. 2011. Daribi kinship at perpendicular angles: a trompe l’oeil anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1, 141–157.Google Scholar
Crapanzano, V. 1986. Hermes’ dilemma: the masking of subversion in ethnographic description. In Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, ed. Clifford, J. and Marcus, G.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, T. 2017. Epistemic artefacts: on the uses of complexity in anthropology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23, 285–301.Google Scholar
Daston, L. and Galison, P. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1994. What is philosophy? (trans. G. Birchill and H. Tomlinson). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 2005a. On anthropological knowledge. Social Anthropology 13, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descola, P. 2005b. Par delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Despret, V. 1996. Naissance d’une théorie éthologique: la danse du cratérope écaillé. Collection les empêcheurs de penser en rond. Le Plessis-Robinson, France: Synthélabo.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 2008. Comparing the incomparable (trans. J. Lloyd). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. D. (ed.) 1966. Purity and danger: an analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. D. (ed.) 1970. Smothering the differences: Mary Douglas in a savage mind about Lévi-Strauss. The Listener.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. D. (ed.) 1978. Judgments on James Frazer. Daedalus 107, 151–164.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1966. Homo hierarchicus: le système des castes et ses implications. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1977. Homo aequalis: Tome i, Genèse et épanouissement de l’idéologie économique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1985. A modified view of our origins: the Christian beginnings of modern individualsm. In The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history, ed. Carrithers, M., Collins, S. and Lukes, S., 257–281. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1986. Essays on individualism: modern ideology in anthropological perspective. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1991. Homo aequalis: l’idéologie allemande: France–Allemagne et retour. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1915. The elementary forms of the religious life (trans. J. W. Swain). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1964. The rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eggan, F. 1954. Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist 56, 743–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, F. 1972. The origin of the family, private property, and the state. New York: Pathfinder Press.Google Scholar
Englund, H. 2018. From the extended-case method to multi-sited ethnography (and back). In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Englund, H. and Yarrow, T. 2013. The place of theory: rights, networks, and ethnographic comparison. Social Analysis 57, 132–149.Google Scholar
Eriksen, A. forthcoming. Going to Pentecost. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer: a description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1950. Social anthropology: past and present; the Marett Lecture, 1950. Man 50, 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1951. Social anthropology. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Fabian, J. 1983. Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fadil, N. and Fernando, M. 2015. Rediscovering the ‘everyday’ Muslim: notes on an anthropological divide. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5, 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falzon, M.-A. (ed.) 2009. Multi-sited ethnography: theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fardon, R. 1990. Localizing strategies: regional traditions of ethnographic writing. Smithsonian series in ethnographic inquiry. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Faris, J. 1973. Pax Britannica and the Sudan: S.F. Nadel. In Anthropology and the colonial encounter, ed. Asad, T., 153–170. New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. and Gupta, A. 2002. Spatializing states: towards an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist 29, 981–1002.Google Scholar
Fernando, M. L. 2010. Reconfiguring freedom: Muslim piety and the limits of secular law and public discourse in France. American Ethnologist 37, 19–35.Google Scholar
Fisher, L. E. and Werner, O. 1978. Explaining explanation: tension in American anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research 34, 194–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortes, M. 1953. The structure of unilineal descent groups. American Anthropologist 55, 17–41.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. and Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (eds.) 1940. African political systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1970. The order of things: an archaeology of human sciences. London: Tavistock Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In The Foucault reader, 76–100. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S. 2001. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gad, C. 2012. What we talk about when we talk about sailor culture: understanding Danish fisheries inspection through a cult movie. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 4, 367–392.Google Scholar
Gad, C. and Bruun Jensen, C. 2016. Lateral comparisons. In Practising comparison: logics, relations, collaborations, ed. Deville, J., Guggenheim, M and Hrdlickova, Z. Manchester: Mattering Press.Google Scholar
Gaiman, N. 2004. American gods: The author’s preferred text. London: Headline.Google Scholar
Garcia, T. 2016a. Nous. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Garcia, T. 2016b. La vie intense: une obsession moderne. Paris: Editions Autrement.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1963. Old societies and new states: the quest for modernity in Asia and Africa. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1967. The cerebral savage. Encounter 28, 25–32.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1971. Islam observed: religious development in Morocco and Indonesia. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973a. Deep play: notes on the Balinese cockfight. In The interpretation of culture: selected essays, ed. Geertz, C.. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973b. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973c. Thick description: towards an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of culture: selected essays, ed. Geertz, C.. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1974. ‘From the native’s point of view’: on the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28, 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. 1988. Works and lives: the anthropologist as author. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1998. The world in pieces: culture and politics at the end of the century. Focaal: Tijdschrift voor Antropologie 32, 91–117.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1999. The art of anthropology. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1983. Muslim society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1987. Relativism and the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gingrich, A. and Fox, R. G. 2002a. Anthropology, by comparison. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gingrich, A. and Fox, R. G. 2002b. Introduction. In Anthropology, by comparison, ed. Fox, R. G. and Gingrich, A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1958. Analysis of a social situation in modern Zululand. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Godelier, M. 1980. The emergence and development of Marxist anthropology in France. In Soviet and western anthropology, ed. Gellner, E.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. New edition. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2017. Other minds: the octopus, the sea, and the deep origins of consciousness. 1st edition. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. H. 1970. Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures, 1968. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1995. The expansive moment: the rise of social anthropology in Britain and Africa, 1918–1970. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goyet, F. 2014. Comparison. In Dictionary of untranslatables: a philosophical lexicon, ed. Cassin, B., Apter, E., Lezra, J. and Wood, M., 159–164. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. 2015. Radical alterity is just another way of saying ‘reality’: a reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5, 1–41.Google Scholar
Grillo, R. D. 2003. Cultural essentialism and cultural anxiety. Anthropological Theory 3, 157–173.Google Scholar
Gross, D. M. 2001. Foucault’s analogies, or how to be a historian of the present without being a presentist. Clio 31, 57.Google Scholar
Handler, R. 2009. The uses of incommensurability in anthropology. New Literary History 40, 627–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. J. 1989. Primate visions: gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1991. Representing fundamentalism: the problem of the repugnant cultural other. Social Research 58, 373–393.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 2005. Negotiating with the positivist legacy: new social justice movements and a standpoint politics of method. In The politics of method in the human sciences: positivism and its epistemological others, ed. Steinmetz, G., 346–365. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastrup, K. 2002. Anthropology’s comparative consciousness. Anthropology, by Comparison 27.Google Scholar
Hecht, J. M. 2003. The end of the soul: scientific modernity, atheism and anthropology in France. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, S. 2009. Alien ocean: anthropological voyages in microbial seas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (eds.) 2007. Thinking through things: theorising artifacts ethnographically. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. 1987. Anthropology through the looking-glass: critical ethnography in the margins of Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. 2001. Performing comparisons: ethnography, globetrotting, and the spaces of social knowledge. Journal of Anthropological Research 57, 259–276.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. B. 1966. Models and analogies in science, vol. xxxvi. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Heywood, P. 2015. Equivocal locations: being ‘red’ in ‘Red Bologna’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21, 855–871.Google Scholar
Heywood, P. 2018a. After difference: queer activism in Italy and anthropological theory. London: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Heywood, P. 2018b. Making difference: queer activism and anthropological theory. Current Anthropology 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, P. 2018c. The ontological turn: school or style? In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
History and Development of the HRAF Collections 2013. Human Relations Area Files – Cultural information for education and research, available online: http://hraf.yale.edu/about/history-and-development/, accessed 22 February 2018.Google Scholar
Højer, L. and Bandak, A. 2015. Introduction: the power of example. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21, 1–17.Google Scholar
Holbraad, M. 2012. Truth in motion: the recursive anthropology of Cuban divination. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holbraad, M. 2016. The contingency of concepts: transcendental deduction and ethnographic expression in anthropological thinking. In Comparative metaphysics: ontology after anthropology, ed. Charbonnier, P., Salmon, G. and Skafish, P.. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Holbraad, M. and Pedersen, M. A. 2009. Planet M: the intense abstraction of Marilyn Strathern. Anthropological Theory 9, 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, M. and Pedersen, M. A. 2017. The ontological turn: an anthropological exposition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M. A. and Viveiros de Castro, E. 2014. The politics of ontology: anthropological positions. Cultural Anthropology Online, available online: http://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions, accessed 11 July 2018.Google Scholar
Holmes, D. R. 2013. Economy of words: communicative imperatives in central banks. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, D. R. 2016. Fascism 2. Anthropology Today 32, 1–3.Google Scholar
Holmes, D. R. and Marcus, G. E. 2005. Cultures of expertise and the management of globalization: towards the re-functioning of ethnography. In Global assemblages: technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems, ed. Ong, A.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holy, L. 1987. Description, generalization and comparison: two paradigms. In Comparative anthropology, ed. Holy, L.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Howe, C. and Boyer, D. 2015. Portable analytics and lateral theory. In Theory can be more than it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition, eds. Boyer, D., Faubion, J. D. and Marcus, G. E.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Howe, L. 1987. Caste in Bali and India: levels of comparison. In Comparative anthropology, ed. Holy, L.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1993. An enquiry concerning human understanding; [with] A letter from a gentleman to his friend in Edinburgh ; [and] An abstract of a treatise of human nature. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. 2016. Placing self amid others: a Mongolian technique of comparison. L’Homme. Revue française d’anthropologie 151–181.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. 2018. Marxism and neo-Marxism. In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. C. 2007. Beyond relativism: comparability in cultural anthropology. Lanham: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1993. The art of translation in a continuous world. In Beyond boundaries: understanding, translation and anthropological discourse, ed. Palsson, G., 210–230. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2008. Anthropology is not ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy 154, 69–92.Google Scholar
Irvine, R. D. G. 2018. Cognitive anthropology as epistemological critique. In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M., 134–147. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iteanu, A. and Moya, I. 2015. Mister D.: radical comparison, values, and ethnographic theory. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5, 113–136.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. 1987. On ethnographic truth. Canberra Anthropology 10, 1–31.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, W. R., Volsche, S. L. and Garcia, J. R. 2015. Is the romantic-sexual kiss a near human universal? American Anthropologist 117, 535–539.Google Scholar
Jean-Klein, I. and Riles, A. 2005. Introducing discipline: anthropology and human rights administrations. PoLAR 28, 173–202.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. 2010. One or three: issues of comparison. In The social after Gabriel Tarde, ed. Candea, M., 103–110. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. B., Herrnstein Smith, B., Lloyd, G. E. R. et al. 2011. Comparative relativism: symposium on an impossibility. Common Knowledge 17, 1–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. 2018. Feminist anthropology and the question of gender. In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keane, W. 2005. Estrangement, intimacy, and the objects of anthropology. In The politics of method in the human sciences: positivism and its epistemological others, ed. Steinmetz, G., 59–88. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, W. 2011. Indexing voice: a morality tale. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21, 166–178.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. 2007. How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of trans-species engagement. American Ethnologist 34, 3–24.Google Scholar
Kuklick, H. 1991. The savage within: the social history of British anthropology, 1885–1945. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuklick, H. 2011. Personal equations: reflections on the history of fieldwork, with special reference to sociocultural anthropology. Isis 102, 1–33.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1973. Anthropologists and anthropology: the British School, 1922–1972. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1999. Culture: the anthropologists’ account. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 2002. Comparison and contextualisation: reflections on South Africa. In Anthropology, by comparison, ed. Gingrich, A. and Fox, R. G., 143–166. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 2005. The reinvention of primitive society: transformations of a myth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, J. 2012. Ontologically challenged. Anthropology of This Century 4, available online: http://aotcpress.com/articles/ontologically-challenged/, accessed 11 July 2018.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, J. 2014. The subject of virtue: an anthropology of ethics and freedom. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, J. 2017. Review: The ontological turn. Social Anthropology 25, 396–402.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, J. 2018. Interpretive cultural anthropology: Geertz and his ‘writing-culture’ critics. In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, J. and Heywood, P. 2013. One more turn and you’re there. Anthropology of This Century 7, available online: http://aotcpress.com/articles/turn/, accessed 11 July 2018.Google Scholar
Lambek, M. 1991. Tryin’ to make it real, but compared to what? Culture 11, 43–51.Google Scholar
Lambek, M., Das, V., Fassin, D. and Keane, W. 2015. Four lectures on ethics: anthropological perspectives. Chicago: Hau.Google Scholar
Lampedusa, G. T. D. 2007. The leopard. Revised edition. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2004. How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society 10, 205.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor–Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2009. The making of law: an ethnography of the Conseil d’etat. Revised edition. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2012. Enquête sur les modes d’existence: une anthropologie des modernes. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2013. An inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lazar, S. 2012. Disjunctive comparison: citizenship and trade unionism in Bolivia and Argentina. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18, 349–368.Google Scholar
Leach, E. R. 1964. Political systems of highland Burma. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Leach, E. R. 1966. Rethinking anthropology. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Leach, E. R. 1974. Claude Lévi-Strauss. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 2012. Philosophical papers and letters: a selection. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
L’Estoile, B. de 2005. ‘Une petite armée de travailleurs auxiliaires’. La division du travail et ses enjeux dans l’ethnologie française de l’entre-deux-guerres. Les Cahiers du Centre de Recherches Historiques, 36, available online: http://ccrh.revues.org/3037.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1958. Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1963. Totemism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1966. The savage mind. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1969. The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. 1955. Comparisons in cultural anthropology. Yearbook of Anthropology 259–292.Google Scholar
Lezaun, J. 2010. Eloquence and incommensurability: an investigation into the grammar of irreconcilable differences. Social Studies of Science 40, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, P. 2004. Inference to the best explanation. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and analogy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2015. Analogical investigations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynteris, C. 2017. Zoonotic diagrams: mastering and unsettling human–animal relations. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23, 463–485.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. E. 1989. We are not French. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2013. Whose justice? Which rationality? 2nd edition. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
McLean, S. 2013. All the difference in the world: liminality, montage, and the reinvention of comparative anthropology. In Transcultural montage, ed. Suhr, C. and Willerslev, R.. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S. 2005. Politics of piety: the Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. 1922. The argonauts of the western Pacific: an account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Malkki, L. H. 1995. Purity and exile: violence, memory and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24, 95–117.Google Scholar
Marsden, M. 2005. Living Islam: Muslim religious experience in Pakistan’s North-West Frontier. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martins, H. 1974. Time and theory in sociology. In Approaches to sociology, ed. Rex, J.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Maurer, B. 2005. Mutual life, limited: Islamic banking, alternative currencies, lateral reason. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 1970. The gift: form and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1959. Darwin and the evolutionary theory in biology. In Evolution and anthropology: a centennial appraisal, ed. Meggers, B. J, 1–10. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Messina, J. and Rutherford, D. 2009. Leibniz on compossibility. Philosophy Compass 4, 962–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1856. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive, being a connected view of the principles, and the methods of scientific investigation, vol. ii. London: J. W. Parker.Google Scholar
Miner, H. 1956. Body ritual among the Nacirema. American Anthropologist 503–507.Google Scholar
Mintz, S. W. 1985. Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, H. 2004. The method of hope: anthropology, philosophy, and Fijian knowledge. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, C. T. 1984. Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2 12/13, 333–358.Google Scholar
Mol, A. 2002a. The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, A. 2002b. Cutting surgeons, walking patients: some complexities involved in comparing. In Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices, ed. Law, J., 218–257. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. de 1965. Complete essays. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. 2005. Comparisons: possible and impossible. Annual Review of Anthropology 34, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlebach, A. K. 2010. The moral neoliberal: welfare and citizenship in Italy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Munasinghe, V. 2008. Rescuing theory from the nation. In Knowing how to know: fieldwork and the ethnographic present, ed. Halstead, N., Hirsch, E. and Okely, J. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. 1949. Social structure. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P., Ford, C. S. and Hudson, A. E. 1950. Outline of cultural materials, 3rd revised edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nadel, S. F. 1951. The foundations of social anthropology. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Nadel, S. F. 1952. Witchcraft in four African societies: an essay in comparison. American Anthropologist 54, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadel, S. F. 1957a. Malinowski on magic and religion. In Man and culture, ed. Firth, R.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Nadel, S. F. 1957b. The theory of social structure. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Nader, L. 2017. Anthropology of law, fear, and the war on terror. Anthropology Today 33, 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, K. 1993. How native is a ‘native’ anthropologist? American Anthropologist new series 95, 671–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naroll, R. 1970. What have we learned from cross-cultural surveys? American Anthropologist 72, 1227–1288.Google Scholar
Navaro-Yashin, Y. 2009. Affective spaces, melancholic objects: ruination and the production of anthropological knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, R. 1972. Belief, language, and experience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Needham, R. 1975. Polythetic classification: convergence and consequences. Man 10, 349–369.Google Scholar
Nzegwu, N. U. 2006. Family matters: feminist concepts in African philosophy of culture. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, A. 1988. Colonialism and modernity: feminist re-presentations of women in non-western societies. Inscriptions 3, 79–93.Google Scholar
Orta, A. 2004. The promise of particularism and the theology of culture: limits and lessons of ‘neo-Boasianism’. American Anthropologist 106, 473–487.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. B. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26, 126–166.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. B. 1995. Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History 37, 173–193.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M. A. 2011. Not quite shamans: spirit worlds and political lives in northern Mongolia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Peel, J. D. Y. 1987. History, culture and the comparative method: a West African puzzle. In Comparative anthropology, ed. Holy, L.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pefanis, J. 1991. Heterology and the postmodern: Bataille, Baudrillard and Lyotard. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, R. G. 1976. Herbert Spencer’s four theories of social evolution. American Journal of Sociology 81, 1339–1359.Google Scholar
Peters, J. D. 2001. Speaking into the air: a history of the idea of communication. New edition. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Petryna, A. 2002. Life exposed: biological citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pina-Cabral, J. de 1992. Against translation: the role of the researcher in the production of ethnographic knowledge. In Europe Observed, ed. de Pina-Cabral, J.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pina-Cabral, J. de 2006. Anthropology challenged: notes for a debate. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12, 663–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pina-Cabral, J. de 2009. The all-or-nothing syndrome and the human condition. Social Analysis 53, 163–176.Google Scholar
Pina-Cabral, J. de 2010. The door in the middle: six conditions for anthropology. In Culture wars: context, models and anthropologists’ accounts, ed. James, D., Plaice, E. M. and Toren, C., 152–169. EASA series 12. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Pincheon, B. S. 2000. An ethnography of silences: race, (homo)sexualities, and a discourse of Africa. African Studies Review 43, 39.Google Scholar
Plutarch, 1989. Lives, vol. iii. Cambridge, MA: Loeb.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. 1914. Science and method (trans. F. Maitland, with a preface by B. Russell). London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Povinelli, E. A. 2001. Radical worlds: the anthropology of incommensurability and inconceivability. Annual Review of Anthropology 319–334.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1951. Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60, 20.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P. 2011. The accompaniment: assembling the contemporary. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P. 2012. Designing human practices: an experiment with synthetic biology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1940. On social structure. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 70, 1–12.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (ed.) 1950. African systems of kinship and marriage. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (ed.) 1951. The comparative method in social anthropology. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 81, 15–22.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (ed.) 1952. Structure and function in primitive society. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Riles, A. 2000. The network inside out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Riles, A. 2011. Collateral knowledge: legal reasoning in the global financial markets. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. 2004. Becoming sinners: Christianity and moral torment in a Papua New Guinea society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. 2007. Continuity thinking and the problem of Christian culture: belief, time, and the anthropology of Christianity. Current Anthropology 48, 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, J. 2013. Beyond the suffering subject: toward an anthropology of the good. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19, 447–462.Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J. 1883. Animal intelligence. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J. 1895. Mind and motion and monism. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1983. Postmodernist bourgeois liberalism. Journal of Philosophy 80, 583–589.Google Scholar
Roscoe, P. B. 1995. The perils of ‘positivism’ in cultural anthropology. American Anthropologist new series, 97, 492–504.Google Scholar
Roth, G. 1978. Introduction. In Max Weber, Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology, ed. G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. 1983. A treatise on social theory, vol. i: The methodology of social theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1963. Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5, 285–303.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1985. Islands of history. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 2002. Waiting for Foucault, still. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. and Service, E. R. (eds.) 1960. Evolution and culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. D. 1976. The use and abuse of biology: an anthropological critique of sociobiology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, E. W. 2003. Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Salmon, G. 2013a. Forme et variante: Franz Boas dans l’histoire du comparatisme. In Franz Boas: le travail du regard, ed. Espagne, M. and Kalinowski, I.., 191–220. Paris: Armand Colin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, G. 2013b. Les structures de l’esprit: Lévi-Strauss et les mythes. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Salmon, G. and Charbonnier, P. 2014. The two ontological pluralisms of French anthropology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20, 567–573.Google Scholar
Salmond, A. 1982. Theoretical landscapes: on cross-cultural conceptions of knowledge. In Semantic anthropology, ed. Parkin, D., 65–88. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Salmond, A. J. M. 2013. Transforming translations (part 1): ‘The owner of these bones’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3, 1–32.Google Scholar
Salmond, A. J. M. 2014. Transforming translations (part 2): Addressing ontological alterity. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4, 155–187.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. and Singer, M. B. 1953. Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference: comparative method in social anthropology. American Anthropologist 55.Google Scholar
Scheffer, D. T. and Niewöhner, J. 2010. Thick comparison: reviving the ethnographic aspiration. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schielke, S. 2009. Being good in Ramadan: ambivalence, fragmentation, and the moral self in the lives of young Egyptians. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15, S24–S40.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. M. 1984. A critique of the study of kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schumaker, L. 2001. Africanizing anthropology: fieldwork, networks, and the making of cultural knowledge in central Africa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U. C. O. 2000. Defenders of the truth: the battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1997. Introduction. In Aristotle Topics Books I and VIII, xi–xxxv. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sneath, D. 2018. From transactionalism to practice theory. In Schools and styles of anthropological theory, ed. Candea, M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 2000. Philosophy of biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Sneath, P. H. A 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. 1896. The study of sociology. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. 1899. Social statics: abridged and revised: together with The man versus the state. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Spiro, M. E. 1966. Religion: problems of definition and explanation. In Anthropological approaches to the study of religion, ed. Banton, M., 85–126. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L., 271–313. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stasch, R. 2014. Linguistic anthropology and sociocultural anthropology. In The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 626–643. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. 2000. The invention of modern science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. 2007. Diderot’s egg: divorcing materialism from eliminativism. Radical Philosophy 144, 7.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. 2009. Thinking with Deleuze and Whitehead: a double test. In Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson: rhizomatic connections, 28–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. 2011. Cosmopolitics, vol. ii. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. 1989. The basic assumptions of Boasian anthropology. In A Franz Boas reader: the shaping of American anthropology, 1883–1911, ed. Stocking, G. W., 1–20. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. 1991a. Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. 1991b. Victorian anthropology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. 1998. After Tylor: British social anthropology, 1888–1951. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. 1989. Rethinking colonial categories: European communities and the boundaries of rule. Comparative Studies in Society and History 31, 134–161.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. 2001. Tense and tender ties: the politics of comparison in North American history and (post) colonial studies. Journal of American History 88, 829–865.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1980. No nature, no culture: the Hagen case. In Nature, culture and gender, ed. MacCormack, C and Strathern, M, 174–222. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1981. Culture in a netbag: the manufacture of a subdiscipline in anthropology. Man, new series 16, 665–688.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1987a. An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology. Signs: Journal of Women, Culture and Society 12, 276–292.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1987b. The limits of auto-anthropology. In Anthropology at home, ed. Jackson, A.. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1987c. Out of context: the persuasive fictions of anthropology [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology 28, 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. 1988. The gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1992. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 2002. Foreword: not giving the game away. In Anthropology, by comparison, ed. Gingrich, A., xii–xvii. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 2004. Partial connections. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 2006. A community of critics? Thoughts on new knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12, 191–209.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 2011. Binary license. Common Knowledge 17, 87–103.Google Scholar
Swanson, G. 1971. Frameworks for comparative research: structural anthropology and the theory of action. In Comparative methods in sociology: essays on trends and applications, ed. Vallier, I. and Apter, D. E., 141–202. Berkeley: University of California Press.Tambiah, S. 1973. Form and meaning of magical acts: a point of view. In Modes of thought: essays on thinking in Western and non-Western societies, ed. Robin Horton and Ruth Finnegan. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Tarde, G. 2016. Monadology and sociology. In The social after Gabriel Tarde: debates and assessments, ed. Candea, M., 31–65. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1985. The person. In The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history, ed. Carrithers, M., Collins, S. and Lukes, S., 257–281. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. 2011. Les opérations du droit. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. W. 1961. On growth and form. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, N. S. 1994. The many perils of ejective anthropomorphism. Behavior and Philosophy 22, 59–70.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. J. 1988. The rhetoric of ethnographic holism. Cultural Anthropology 3, 285–303.Google Scholar
Toren, C. and de Pina-Cabral, J. 2009. Introduction: what is happening to epistemology? Social Analysis 53, 1.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. L. 2014. Strathern beyond the human: testimony of a spore. Theory, Culture and Society 31, 221–241.Google Scholar
Tyler, S. 1984. The poetic turn in postmodern anthropology: the poetry of Paul Friedrich. American Anthropologist 86, 328–336.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. 1871. Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom, vol. i. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. 1889. On a method of investigating the development of institutions; applied to laws of marriage and descent. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 18.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, P. 2013. The modern spirit of Asia: the spiritual and the secular in China and India. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, P. 2014. The value of comparison. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, Morgan Lectures Initiative, 1–14.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, P. 2016. The value of comparison. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Van Velsen, J. 1967. The extended-case method and situational analysis. In The craft of social anthropology, ed. Epstein, A. L., 129–149. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4, 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2003. And. Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology 7. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2004. Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipití (Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America) 2, 3–22.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2011. Zeno and the art of anthropology: of lies, beliefs, paradoxes, and other truths. Common Knowledge 17, 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. 1977. Scientific and indigenous Papuan conceptualizations of the innate: a semiotic critique of the ecological perspective. In Subsistence and survival, ed. Bayliss-Smith, T. O. and Feachem, R., 385–410. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. 1981. The invention of culture. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walford, A. 2015. Double standards: examples and exceptions in scientific metrological practices in Brazil. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21, 64–77.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1924. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
White, P. S. 2005. The experimental animal in Victorian Britain. In Thinking with animals: new perspectives on anthropomorphism, ed. Daston, L., 59–81. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1958. An introduction to mathematics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willerslev, R. 2011. Frazer strikes back from the armchair: a new search for the animist soul. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17, 504–526.Google Scholar
Williams, B. A. O. 2005. In the beginning was the deed: realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 2007. Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1973. Philosophical investigations (trans. G. E. M. Anscombe). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. 1983. Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yarrow, T. forthcoming. The space between: life and work in an architectural practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yengoyan, A. A. (ed.) 2006a. Introduction: on the issue of comparison. In Modes of comparison: theory and practice, ed. Yengoyan, A. A., 1–27. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Yengoyan, A. A. (ed.) 2006b. Modes of comparison: theory and practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Matei Candea, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Comparison in Anthropology
  • Online publication: 12 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667609.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Matei Candea, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Comparison in Anthropology
  • Online publication: 12 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667609.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Matei Candea, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Comparison in Anthropology
  • Online publication: 12 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667609.014
Available formats
×