HOW INSTITUTIONS EVOLVE

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803963.007

6 - HOW INSTITUTIONS EVOLVE

INSIGHTS FROM COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Kathleen Thelen

Edited by

James Mahoney and

Dietrich Rueschemeyer

Show author details

Kathleen Thelen: Affiliation:
Northwestern University
James Mahoney: Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Dietrich Rueschemeyer: Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

This essay explores the question of how formal institutions change. Despite the importance assigned by many scholars to the role of institutions in structuring political life, the issue of how these institutions are themselves shaped and reconfigured over time has not received the attention it is due. In the 1970s and 1980s, a good deal of comparative institutionalist work centered on comparative statics and was concerned with demonstrating the ways in which different institutional arrangements drove divergent political and policy outcomes (e.g., Katzenstein 1978). In addition, scholarship in the comparative historical tradition has yielded important insights into the genesis of divergent (usually national) trajectories. Works in this vein include some classics such as Gerschenkron (1962), Moore (1966), and Shefter (1977), but also significant recent contributions such as Collier and Collier (1991), Skocpol (1992), Spruyt (1994), Ertman (1997), Gould (1999), and Huber and Stephens (2001). Finally, we have a number of analyses that address the issue of “feedback mechanisms” that are responsible for the reproduction of various institutional and policy trajectories over time (e.g., Pierson 1993; Skocpol 1992; Weir 1992b).

Ongoing theoretical work centering on the concept of path dependence by Mahoney, Pierson, and others has lent greater precision to previous formulations based on the dual notions of “critical junctures” and “historical trajectories” (Mahoney 2000; Pierson 2000a). As these authors have shown, some of the major works in comparative historical analysis can be read as illustrations of path dependence in social and political development.

Type: Chapter
Information: Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences , pp. 208 - 240

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803963.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, Gerard. 2001. “Institutions, Path Dependence, and Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13: 249–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Aoki, Masahiko. 1988. Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press

Aoki, Masahiko and Hugh Patrick, eds. 1994. The Japanese Main Bank System. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Arthur, W. Brian. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events.” Economic Journal 99: 116–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell, John. 1997. “Mechanisms of Evolutionary Change in Economic Governance: Interaction, Interpretation and Bricolage.” Pp. 10–32 in Evolutionary Economics and Path Dependence, edited by L. Magnusson and J. Ottosson. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar

Clemens, Elisabeth. 1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women's Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 755–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Collier, Ruth B. and David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

David, Paul. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75: 332–7Google Scholar

Dobbin, Frank. 1994. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain and France in the Railway Age. New York: Cambridge University Press

Ekiert, Grzegorz and Stephen Hanson, eds. in press-a. Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press

Ekiert, Grzegorz and Stephen Hanson in press-b. “Time, Space, and Institutional Change in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule, edited by G. Ekiert and S. Hanson. New York: Cambridge University Press

Elster, Jon. 1989. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. New York: Cambridge University Press

Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press

Finegold, David and Soskice, David. 1988. “The Failure of Training in Britain: Analysis and Prescription.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 4: 21–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Fligstein, Neil. 1991. “The Structural Transformation of American Industry.” Pp. 311–36 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press

Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Gibson, Edward L. and Tulia Falleti. in press. “Unity by the Stick: Regional Conflict and the Origins of Argentine Federalism.” In Federalism: Latin America in Comparative Perspective, edited by E. L. Gibson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Gillingham, John. 1985. “The ‘Deproletarization’ of German Society: Vocational Training in the Third Reich.” Journal of Social History 19: 423–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Gould, Andrew. 1999. Origins of Liberal Dominance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Past: The Regeneration of the Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe after 1989. New York: Cambridge University Press

Haydu, Jeffrey. 1998. “Making Use of the Past: Time Periods as Cases to Compare and as Sequences of Problem-Solving.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 339–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Herrigel, Gary. 2000. “American Occupation, Market Order, and Democracy: Reconfiguring the Steel Industry in Japan and Germany after the Second World War.” Pp. 340–99 in Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking U.S. Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan, edited by J. Zeitlin and G. Herrigel. New York: Oxford University Press

Huber, Evelyne and John D. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare States: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Inglot, Tomasz. in press. “Historical Legacies, Institutions, and the Politics of Social Policy in Hungary and Poland, 1989–1999.” In Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by G. Ekiert and S. Hanson. New York: Cambridge University Press

Kato, J. 1996. “Path Dependency as a Logic of Comparative Studies: Theorization and Application.” Paper read at the 92nd annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, at San Francisco, August 29 to September 1

Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1978. Beyond Power and Plenty. Madison: University of Wiscons in Press

Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Kitschelt, Herbert, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John D. Stephens, eds. 1999a. Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press

Kitschelt, Herbert, Zdenka Mansfeldova, Radoslaw Markowski, and Gabor Toka, eds. 1999b. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press

Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press

Knight, Jack 1999. “Explaining the Rise of Neo-Liberalism: The Mechanisms of Institutional Change.” Unpublished manuscript, Washington University in St. Louis

Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Krasner, Stephen D. 1988. “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 21: 66–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Kurzer, Paulette. 1993. Business and Banking. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 2001. “The Institutional Embedding of Market Economies: The German ‘Model’ and Its Impact on Japan.” Pp. 39–93 in The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan, edited by W. Streeck and K. Yamamura. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Levi, Margaret. 1997. “A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis.” Pp. 19–41 in Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by M. I. Lichbach and A. S. Zuckerman. New York: Cambridge University Press

Levy, Jonah. 1999. Tocqueville's Revenge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Lichtenstein, Nelson. 1988. “The Union's Early Days: Shop Stewards and Seniority Rights.” Pp. 65–74 in Choosing Sides: Unions and the Team Concept, edited by Mike Parker and Jane Slaughter. Boston: South End Books

Lipset, Seymour Martin and Stein Rokkan. 1968. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments.” Pp. 1–64 in Party System and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, edited by S. M. Lipsetand S. Rokkan. New York: Free Press

Locke, Richard M. and Thelen, Kathleen. 1995. “Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics.” Politics and Society 23: 337–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29: 507–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Manow, Philip. 2001. “Social Protection, Capitalist Production: The Bismarckian Welfare State and the German Political Economy from the 1880s to the 1990s.” Habilitätionsschrift, University of Konstanz, Konstanz

McDonald, Terrance J., ed. 1996. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Meyer, J. W. and B. Rowan. 1991. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” Pp. 41–62 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Moe, Terry. 1990. “The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy.” Pp. 116–53 in Organizational Theory, edited by O. Williamson. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press

Myles, John and Paul Pierson. 2001. “The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform.” Pp. 305–33 in The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by P. Pierson. New York: Oxford University Press

North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press

Nunberg, Barbara. 1999. The State After Communism, World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies. Washington, DC: The World Bank

Orren, K., and S. Skowronek. 1994. “Beyond the Iconography of Order: Notes for a ‘New’ Institutionalism.” Pp. 311–30 in The Dynamics of American Politics, edited by L. C. Dodd and C. Jillson. Boulder, CO: Westview

Orren, K., and S. Skowronek 2000. “History and Governance in the Study of American Political Development.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC

Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. “Coping with Tragedies of the Commons.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 493–537CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45: 595–628CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pierson, Paul 2000a. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94: 251–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul 2000b. “The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change.” Governance 13: 475–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul 2000c. “Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequences in Political Processes.” Studies in American Political Development 14: 72–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul 2001. “Explaining Institutional Origins and Change.” Manuscript, Harvard University

Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol. in press. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by H. Milner and I. Katznelson. New York and Washington, DC: W. W. Norton and the American Political Science Association

Pollack, Mark. 1996. “The New Institutionalism and EC Governance: Promise and Limits of Institutional Analysis.” Governance 9: 429–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Powell, Walter W. 1991. “Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis.” Pp. 183–203 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Powell, Walter W. and Daniel L. Jones, eds. in press. How Institutions Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Riker, William H. 1964. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown

Riker, William H. 1980. “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 74: 432–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press

Scharpf, Fritz. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Boulder, CO: Westview

Schickler, Eric. 1999. “Disjointed Pluralism and Congressional Development: An Overview.” Paper read at the 95th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September 2–5

Schickler, Eric 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Schneiberg, Marc and Elisabeth Clemens. in press. “The Typical Tools for the Job: Research Strategies in Institutional Analysis.” In How Institutions Change, edited by W. W. Powell and D. L. Jones. Chicago: Chicago University Press

Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Scott, W. Richard and John W. Meyer. 1994. “The Rise of Training Programs in Firms and Agencies.” Pp. 228–54 in Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism, edited by W. R. Scott and J. W. Meyer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Sewell, William H. 1996. “Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” Pp. 245–80 in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by T. J. McDonald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Shefter, Martin. 1977. “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and Italy.” Politics and Society 7: 403–51CrossRef Google Scholar

Shonfeld, Andrew. 1969. Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. London: Oxford University Press

Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap

Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Stark, David and László Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press

Stephens, John D., Evelyne Huber, and Leonard Ray. 1999. “Welfare State in Hard Times.” Pp. 164–93 in Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, and J. D. Stephens. New York: Cambridge University Press

Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World

Thelen, Kathleen. 1991. Union of Parts: Labor Politics in Postwar Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Thelen, Kathleen 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” The Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404CrossRef Google Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen 2002. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Comparative-Historical Perspective. Book manuscript, Northwestern University. Evanston

Thelen, Kathleen and Sven Steinmo. 1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Pp. 1–32 in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, and F. Longstreth. New York: Cambridge University Press

Vogel, Steven K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Watts, Ronald L. 1987. “The American Constitution in Comparative Perspective: A Comparison of Canada and the United States.” Journal of American History 74: 769–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. and Marshall, William J.. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Weir, Margaret. 1992a. “Ideas and the Politics of Bounded Innovation.” Pp. 188–216 in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, and F. Longstreth. New York: Cambridge University Press

Weir, Margaret. 1992b. Politics and Jobs: The Boundaries of Employment Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: University Press

Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2000. “Introduction: Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking U.S. Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan.” Pp. 1–50 in Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking U.S. Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan, edited by J. Zeitlin and G. Herrigel. New York: Oxford University Press