ALIGNING ONTOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803963.012

11 - ALIGNING ONTOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Peter A. Hall

Edited by

James Mahoney and

Dietrich Rueschemeyer

Show author details

Peter A. Hall: Affiliation:
Harvard University
James Mahoney: Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Dietrich Rueschemeyer: Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Some of the liveliest debates about methodology in the social sciences center on comparative research. This essay concentrates on comparative politics, a field often defined by reference to the use of a particular “comparative method,” but it also bears on sociology, where there is active controversy about methodological issues. I use the term “methodology” to refer to the means scholars employ to increase confidence that the inferences they make about the social and political world are valid. The most important of these are inferences about causal relationships, where the object of a methodology is to increase confidence in assertions that one variable or event (x) exerts a causal effect on another (y).

One of the curious features of contemporary debates is that they pay more attention to methodology than to issues of ontology. “Ontology” refers to the character of the world as it actually is. Accordingly, I use the term to refer to the fundamental assumptions scholars make about the nature of the social and political world and especially about the nature of causal relationships within that world. If a methodology consists of techniques for making observations about causal relations, an ontology consists of premises about the deep causal structures of the world from which analysis begins and without which theories about the social world would not make sense. At a fundamental level, it is how we imagine the social world to be.

Type: Chapter
Information: Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences , pp. 373 - 404

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803963.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1988. “Transcending General Linear Reality.” Sociological Theory 6: 169–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Abbott, Andrew 1993. “Sequences of Social Events: Concepts and Methods for the Analysis of Order in Social Processes.” Historical Methods 16: 129–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Abbott, Andrew 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Almond, Gabriel A. 1956. “Comparative Political Systems.” Journal of Politics 17: 391–409CrossRef Google Scholar

Almond, Gabriel and G. Bingham Powell, Jr. 1966. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown

Almond, Gabriel and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Apter, David E. 1965. The Politics of Modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Archer, Margaret, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson, and Alan Norrie, eds. 1998. Critical Realism: Essential Readings. London: Routledge

Bagehot, William. 1867. The English Constitution. London: Chapman and Hall

Bates, Robert, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry Weingast. 1998. Analytical Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Bennett, Andrew and George, Alexander. 2001. “Case Studies and Process Tracing in History and Political Science: Similar Strokes for Different Foci.” Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar

Bennett, Andrew and Alexander George in press. Case Studies and Theory Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bentley, Arthur. 1908. The Process of Government. Cambridge, MA: Belknap

Bill, James A. and Robert Hardgrave. 1973. Comparative Politics: The Quest for Theory. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill

Binder, Leonard, James S. Coleman, Joseph LaPalombara, Lucian W. Pye, Sidney Verba, and Myron Weiner. 1971. Crises and Sequences in Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Braumoeller, Bear. 2000. “Modeling Multiple Causal Paths: Logic, Derivation and Implementation.” Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Donald T. 1975. “Degrees of Freedom and the Case Study.” Comparative Political Studies 8: 178–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 1997. “What Is a Causal Structure?” Pp. 342–58 in Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences, edited by Vaughtn R. McKim and Stephen P. Turner. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press

Cederman, Lars-Enik. 1997. Emergent Actors in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Chilcote, Ronald H. 1981. Theories of Comparative Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview

Collier, David, 1991. “The Comparative Method: Two Decades of Change.” Pp. 7–31 in Comparative Political Dynamics, edited by Dankwart Rustow and Kenneth Erickson. New York: HarperCollins

Collier, David and Adcock, Robert. 1999. “Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choice about Concepts.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 537–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Collier, Ruth Berins and David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Cook, T. D. and Donald T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation. New York: Houghton Mifflin

Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf

Easton, David 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Eckstein, Harry. 1963. “A Perspective on Comparative Politics.” Pp. 3–33 in Comparative Politics, edited by Harry Eckstein and David Apter. New York: The Free Press

Eckstein, Harry 1965. “On the Etiology of Internal Wars.” History and Theory 4: 133–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Eckstein, Harry 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Macro-Politics.” Pp. 79–139 in Handbook of Political Science I, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Eckstein, Harry and David Apter, eds. 1963. Comparative Politics: A Reader. New York: Free Press

Elster, Jon. 1983. Explaining Technical Change. New York: Cambridge University Press

Elster, Jon 1998. “A Plea for Mechanisms.” Pp. 45–73 in Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by Peter Hedström and Richard Swedberg. New York: Cambridge University Press

Elster, Jon 2000. “Review Essay: ‘Analytical Narratives.’” American Political Science Review 94: 685–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Franzese, Robert. J., Jr. 2001. Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press

Frey, Fredrick. 1985. “The Problem of Actor Designation in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Politics 17: 127–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1968. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” Pp. 508–29 in Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by May Brodbeck. New York: Macmillan

Friedrich, Carl J. 1950. Constitutional Government and Democracy, rev. edition. Boston: Ginn

Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get.” Political Analysis 2: 131–49CrossRef Google Scholar

George, Alexander. 1979. “Case Studies and Theory: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison.” Pp. 43–68 in Diplomacy: New Approaches to History, Theory and Policy, edited by Paul Larson. New York: Free Press

Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Goldthorpe, John A. 1997. “Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology: A Debate on Methodological Issues.” Comparative Social Research 16: 1–26Google Scholar

Greenstein, Fred I. and Nelson Polsby, eds. 1975. Handbook of Political Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Grew, Raymond. 1978. Crises of Political Development in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Hedström, Peter and Richard Swedberg, eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press

Hempel, Carl. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press

Hoffmann, Stanley. 1963. “Paradoxes of the French Political Community.” Pp. 1–117 in In Search of France, edited by Stanley Hoffmann et al. New York: Harper

Holt, Robert T. and John E. Turner, eds. 1970. The Methodology of Comparative Research. New York: Free Press

Hume, David. [1748] 1955. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill

Jackson, John E. 1996. “Political Methodology: An Overview.” Pp. 717–48 in A New Handbook of Political Science, edited by Robert Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Katznelson, Ira. 1997. “Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics.” Pp. 81–112 in Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by Mark Lichbach and Alan Zuckerman. New York: Cambridge University Press

King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Knight, Jack and Itai Sened, eds. 1995. Explaining Social Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs.” Pp. 91–196 in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lasswell, Harold. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, Where, How? New York: McGraw-Hill

Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press

Lichbach, Mark and Alan Zuckerman. eds. 1997. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure. New York: Cambridge University Press

Lieberson, Stanley. 1985. Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press

Lieberson, Stanley 1992. “Small N's and Big Conclusions.” Pp. 105–18 in What Is a Case?, edited by Charles C. Ragin and Howard S. Becker. New York: Cambridge University Press

Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 64: 682–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend 1975. “The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 8: 158–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53: 69–105CrossRef Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1978. “Is a Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” Pp. 226–84 in The Practice of Comparative Politics, edited by Paul Lewis, David Potler, and Francis Castles. New York: Longman

Macridis, Roy. 1968. “Comparative Politics and the Study of Governments: The Search for Focus.” Comparative Politics 1: 79–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2000a. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29: 507–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Mahoney, James 2000b. “Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 28: 387–424CrossRef Google Scholar

Mahoney, James 2001. “Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method.” Sociological Forum 16: 575–93CrossRef Google Scholar

McDonald, Terrence J., ed. 1996. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Merton, Robert K. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press

Mill, John Stuart. 1872. A System of Logic. New York: Harper

Milner, Helen. 1998. Interests, Institutions and Information. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Moon, Donald. 1975. “The Logic of Political Inquiry.” Pp. 131–95 in Handbook of Political Science, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World

O'Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press

Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press

Pierson, Paul. 2000a. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94: 251–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul 2000b. “Not Just What but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Development.” Studies in American Political Development 14: 72–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley

Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of California Press

Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Ragin, Charles C. and Howard S. Becker, eds. 1992. What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press

Richter, Melvin. 1970. Essays in Theory and History: An Approach to the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Roberts, Clayton. 1996. The Logic of Historical Explanation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press

Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64: 1033–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1935. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall

Sewell, William. 1996. “Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” Pp. 245–80 in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by Terrence J. McDonald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Shalev, Michael. 1998. “Limits of and Alternatives to Multiple Regression in Macro-Comparative Research.” Paper presented at a conference on “The Welfare State at the Crossroads,” Stockholm

Shively, W. Phillips. 1974. The Craft of Political Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. New York: Cambridge University Press

Skocpol, Theda and Somers, Margaret. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 174–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Smelser, Neil. 1966.“Notes on the Methodology of Comparative Analysis of Economic Activity.” Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology. Evian: International Sociological Association

Smelser, Neil 1976. Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Somers, Margaret R. 1996. “Where Is Sociology after the Historic Turn? Knowledge, Cultures, Narrativity, and Historical Epistemologies.” Pp. 53–90 in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by Terrence J. McDonald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Thelen, Kathleen 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage

Thelen, Kathleen 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404CrossRef Google Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen 2000. “Time and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Evolution and Change.” Studies in American Political Development 14: 102–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles 1995. “To Explain Political Processes.” American Journal of Sociology 100: 1594–610CrossRef Google Scholar

Verba, Sidney. 1967. “Some Dilemmas of Comparative Research.” World Politics 20: 111–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Verba, Sidney 1971. “Cross-National Survey Research: The Problem of Credibility.” Pp. 309–56 in Comparative Methods in Sociology, edited by Ivan Vallier. Berkeley: University of California Press

Wallerstein, Michael. 2000. “Trying to Navigate between Scylla and Charybdis: Misspecified and Unidentified Models in Comparative Politics.” APSA-CP: Newsletter for the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association 11: 1–21Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. A Theory of International Relations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press

Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press

Wilson, Woodrow. 1890. The State. Boston: Heath

Winch, Donald. 1989. “Keynes, Keynesianism and State Intervention.” Pp. 107–28 in The Political Power of Economic Ideas, edited by Peter A. Hall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Wolin, Sheldon. 1969. “Political Theory as a Vocation.” American Political Science Review 63: 1062–82CrossRef Google Scholar