Importance of Social Categorization for Forgiveness and Collective Guilt Assignment for the Holocaust

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139106931.017

15 - Importance of Social Categorization for Forgiveness and Collective Guilt Assignment for the Holocaust

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2012

Michael J. A. Wohl and

Nyla R. Branscombe

Edited by

Nyla R. Branscombe and

Bertjan Doosje

Show author details

Michael J. A. Wohl: Affiliation:
Carleton University
Nyla R. Branscombe: Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Nyla R. Branscombe: Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bertjan Doosje: Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Although more than a half century has passed since the liberation of the Nazi concentration camps, the extermination of some six million Jews remains the prototype of the violence that one group can commit against another group (Barkan, 2000; Staub, 1989). The extent to which contemporary Germans should and do continue to feel collective guilt for the Nazi genocide is a topic of much ongoing political debate (see Churchill, 1997; Goldhagen, 1996; Gross, 2001). Indeed, most of the chapters in this volume examine influences on the willingness of such perpetrator groups to accept guilt for their group's past. In contrast, in this chapter, we focus on the factors that lead historically victimized group members to assign or prescriptively desire that contemporary members of the perpetrator group experience collective guilt.

Given that collective guilt can be both accepted and assigned based on category membership alone, and does not require personal responsibility for the wrongdoing, social categorization processes should play a crucial role. We report on studies that empirically examine collective guilt assignment and forgiveness of contemporary Germans for the Holocaust among North American–Jewish people as a function of how the groups are categorized. We consider the consequences of perceiving Germans and Jews as distinct and separate groups, versus perceiving both groups as part of a single more inclusive superordinate category – that of humans.

Type: Chapter
Information: Collective Guilt
International Perspectives
, pp. 284 - 306

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139106931.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York: W. W. Norton

Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Boon, S. D., & Sulsky, L. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19–44Google Scholar

Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press

Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2003). How people explain the Holocaust: Assignment of collective guilt to Germans as a function of level of categorization. Manuscript submitted for publication

Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell

Brown, R., & Abrams, D. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Churchill, W. (1997). A little matter of genocide. San Francisco, CA: City Light Books

Enright, R., & North, J. (1998). Exploring forgiveness. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press

Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 133–55). New York: Guilford Press

Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (pp. 1–26). Chichester, UK: WileyCrossRef

Gaertner, S. L, Dovidio, J. F, Nier, J. A, Ward, C. M, & Banker, B. S. (1999). Across cultural divides: The value of a superordinate identity. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds). Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 173–212). New York: Russell Sage Foundation

Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–24CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goldhagen, D. J. (1996). Hitler's willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Knopf

Gorenberg, G. (2002). The thin green line. Mother Jones, 27, 48–56Google Scholar

Gross, J. T. (2001). Neighbours: The destruction of the Jewish community in Jedwabne, Poland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. J. (1998). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (pp. 203–39). New York: Wiley

Hewstone, M. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Marques, J., Paez, D., & Serra, A. F. (1997). Social sharing, emotional climate, and the transgenerational transmission of memories: The Portuguese colonial war. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez & B. Rime (Eds.), Collective memory of political events (pp. 253–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness: History, conceptual issues, and overview. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–14). New York: Guilford Press

Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston, MA: Beacon Press

Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell

Paez, D., Basabe, N., & Gonzalez, J. L. (1997). Social processes and collective memory: A cross-cultural approach to remembering political events. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rime (Eds.), Collective memory of political events (pp. 147–74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Pennebaker, J. W., & Banasik, B. L. (1997). On the creation and maintenance of collective memories: History as social psychology. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez & B. Rime (Eds.), Collective memory of political events (pp. 3–19). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation. London: Sage

Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 64–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L. Jr., Everett, L., & Hight, T. L. (2000). Seeking forgiveness: Theoretical context and an initial empirical study. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 28, 21–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmitt, M. T., & Silvia, P. J., & Branscombe, N. R. (2000). The intersection of self-evaluation maintenance and social identity theories: Intragroup judgment in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1598–1606CrossRef Google Scholar

Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall

Tangney, J. P., & Fischer, K. W. (1995). (Eds.). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York: Guilford Press

Teveth, S. (1996). Ben-Gurion and the Holocaust. New York: Harcourt Brace

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell

Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. S. (1999). Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self-categorizing perspective. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 11–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Doubleday

Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press

Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Manuscript submitted for publication

Wohl, M. J. A., & Pritchard, E. T. (2003). The relationship between forgiveness and responsibility: An application of the triangle model. Manuscript submitted for publication

Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003CrossRef Google Scholar

Zechmeister, J. S., & Romero, C. (2002). Victim and offender accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives of forgiveness and unforgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 675–86CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zuckerman, M. (1993). Shoah in the sealed room: The “Holocaust” in the Israel press during the Gulf War. Tel Aviv: The Author's Publishing