Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:26:00.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2024

Adam Seth Levine
Adam Seth Levine
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Collaborate Now!
How Expertise Becomes Useful in Civic Life
 , pp. 201 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaluck, Jason, Kwong, Laura H., Styczynski, Ashley, et al. 2021. “Normalizing Community Mask-Wearing: A Cluster Randomized Trial in Bangladesh.” NBER Working Paper 28734: www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w28734/w28734.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlquist, John and Levi, Margaret. 2014. In the Interest of Others: Organizations and Social Activism. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertson, Bethany and Kushner Gadarian, Shana. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jennifer. 2000. “Adaptive Strategies of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations in an Era of Devolution and New Public Management.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10: 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2003. Talking to Strangers. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2013. “A Connected Society.” Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture 53: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2016. “Toward a Connected Society.” In Lewis, Earl and Cantor, Nancy (Eds.) Our Compelling Interests (pp. 71–105). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2023. Justice by Means of Democracy. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Academy of Arts and Sciences (AAAS). 2020. Our Common Purpose: Reinventing American Democracy for the 21st Century. American Academy of Arts and Sciences (AAAS)Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2006. “The Epistemology of Democracy.” Episteme 3: 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Kenneth T., Ganz, Marshall, Baggetta, Matthew, Han, Hahrie, and Lim, Chaeyoon. 2010. “Leadership, Membership, and Voice: Civic Associations That Work.” American Journal of Sociology 115: 1191–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F. 2021. “Party and Ideology in American Local Government: An Appraisal.” Annual Review of Political Science 24: 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggetta, Matthew, Han, Hahrie, and Andrews, Kenneth T.. 2013. “Leading Associations: How Individual Characteristics and Team Dynamics Generate Committed Leaders.” American Sociological Review 78: 544–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balliet, Daniel. 2010. “Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54: 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, Jean M. 2007. “Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need Not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration.” Academy of Management Journal 50: 1323–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank and Leech, Beth. 1998. Basic Interests. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Angela T., Wyborn, Carina, Cvitanovic, Chris, et al. 2018. “Boundary Spanning at the Science-Policy Interface: The Practitioners’ Perspectives.” Sustainability Science 13: 1175–1183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bednarek, Angela and Tseng, Vivian. 2022. “A Global Movement for Engaged Research.” Issues in Science and Technology 38: 53–56.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bogenschneider, Karen and Corbett, Tom J.. 2010. Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policymakers. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bogenschneider, Karen, Day, Elizabeth, and Parrott, Emily. 2019. Revisiting Theory on Research Use: Turning to Policymakers for Fresh Insights. American Psychologist 74: 778–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowers, Jake and Testa, Paul F.. 2019. “Better Government, Better Science: The Promise of and Challenges Facing the Evidence-Informed Policy Movement.” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Ernest L. 2016 [1990]. Scholarship Reconsidered. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.” American Political Science Review 93: 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, David E. and Kalla, Joshua. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing.” Science 352: 220–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brossard, Dominique and Lewenstein, Bruce V.. 2009. “A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science: Using Practice to Inform Theory.” In Kahlor, LeeAnn and Stout, Patricia A. (Eds.) Communicating Science: New Agendas in Communication (pp. 11–39). Routledge.Google Scholar
Brownson, Ross C., Royer, Charles, Ewing, Reid, and McBride, Timothy D.. 2006. “Researchers and Policymakers: Travelers in Parallel Universes.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 30: 164–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busby, Ethan. 2021. Should You Stay Away from Strangers? Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Vannevar. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. 2019. “Facilitating Field Experiments at the Subnational Level.” Journal of Politics 81: 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., Volden, Craig, Dynes, Adam M., and Shor, Boris. 2017. “Ideology, Learning, and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 61: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairney, Paul. 2016. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy and Hardie, Jeremy. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casciaro, Tiziana and Sousa Lobo, Miguel. 2008. “When Competence Is Irrelevant: The Role of Interpersonal Affect in Task-Related Ties.” Administrative Science Quarterly 53: 655–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Serena, Shechter, David, and Chaiken, Shelly. 1996. “Getting at the Truth or Getting Along: Accuracy- Versus Impression-Motivated Heuristic and Systematic Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopherson, Elizabeth Good, Scheufele, Dietram A., and Smith, Brooke. 2018. “The Civic Science Imperative.” Stanford Social Innovation Review. Spring.Google Scholar
Coburn, Cynthia E. and Penuel, William R.. 2016. “Research-Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions.” Educational Researcher 45: 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Wesley M. and Levinthal, Daniel A.. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Fay Lomax, Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2007. “Who Deliberates? Discursive Participation in America.” Institute for Policy Research Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Caren B., Hawn, Chris L., Larson, Lincoln R., et al. 2021. “Inclusion in Citizen Science: The Conundrum of Rebranding.” Science 372: 1386–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Katherine. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. and Toff, Benjamin. 2017. “The Fact of Experience: Rethinking Political Knowledge and Civic Competence.” Perspectives on Politics 15: 754–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer Walsh, Katherine. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, D. Max, Taylor Scott, J., Long, Elizabeth C., et al. 2021. “Lawmakers’ Use of Scientific Evidence Can Be Improved.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dietz, Thomas. 2013. “Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication.” PNAS 110: 14081–14087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobbins, Maureen, Hanna, Steven E., Ciliska, Donna, et al. 2009. “A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Knowledge Translation and Exchange Strategies.” Implementation Science 4.Google ScholarPubMed
Douglas, Heather E. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2015. “Communicating Policy-Relevant Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 48: 58–69.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P.. 2021. “A New Era of Experimental Political Science.” In Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P. (Eds.) Advances in Experimental Political Science (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. and Karau, Steven J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109: 573–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einstein, Katherine Levine, Glick, David M., and Palmer, Maxwell. 2019. “City Learning: Evidence of Policy Information Diffusion from a Survey of U.S. Mayors.” Political Research Quarterly 72: 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, Robin J. and Thomas, David A.. 2001. “Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes.” Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epley, Nicholas and Schroeder, Juliana. 2014. “Mistakenly Seeking Solitude.” Journal of Experimental Psychology General 143: 1980–1999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, Steven. 1995. “The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 20: 408–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eveland, William P., Morey, Alyssa C., and Hutchens, Myiah J.. 2011. “Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective.” Journal of Communication 61: 1082–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Caitlin C., Coburn, Cynthia E., and Chong, Seenae. 2019. “Under What Conditions Do School Districts Learn from External Partners? The Role of Absorptive Capacity.” American Educational Research Journal 56: 955–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry and Rohilla Shalizi, Cosma. 2015. “Pursuing Cognitive Democracy.” In Allen, Danielle and Light, Jennifer S. (Eds.) From Voice to Influence (pp. 211–231). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 2011. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., and Glick, Peter. 2007. Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence.” TRENDS in Cognitive Science 11: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Glick, Peter, and Xu, Jun. 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. and Dupree, Cydney. 2014. “Gaining Trust as well as Respect in Communicating to Motivated Audiences about Science Topics.” PNAS 111: 13593–13597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frohlich, Norman and Oppenheimer, Joe A.. 1992. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe A., and Young, Oran R.. 1971. Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2003. “Associations and Democracy: Between Theories, Hopes, and Realities.” Annual Review of Sociology 29: 515–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, Adam D., Todd, Andrew R., Homan, Astrid C., et al. 2015. “Maximizing the Gains and Minimizing the Pains of Diversity: A Policy Perspective.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10: 742–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamoran, Adam. 2018. “Evidence-Based Policy in the Real World: A Cautionary View.” Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Science 678: 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganz, Marshall. 2000. “Resources and Resourcefulness: Strategic Capacity in the Unionization of California Agriculture, 1959–1966.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 1003–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganz, Marshall. 2009. Why David Sometimes Wins. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
García Bedolla, Lisa and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2012. Mobilizing Inclusion: Transforming the Electorate through Get-Out-the-Vote Campaigns. Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (Eds.). 2005. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century. Jossey-Boss.Google Scholar
Gazley, Beth. 2017. “The Current State of Interorganizational Collaboration: Lessons for Human Service Research and Management.” Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership, and Governance 41: 1–5.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2017. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, Kristin A. 2006. Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Gerber, Alan S.. 2010. “Introduction to Social Pressure and Voting: New Experimental Evidence.” Political Behavior 32: 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Gerber, Alan S.. 2019. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Kara L., Vogel, Amanda L., Huang, Grace C., et al. 2018. “The Science of Team Science: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and Research Gaps on Collaboration in Science.” American Psychologist 73: 532–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, Nina. 2022. Transnational Advocacy in the Digital Era: Think Global, Act Local. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Hahrie. 2009. Moved to Action: Motivation, Participation, and Inequality in American Politics. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Hahrie. 2014. How Organizations Develop Activists. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Hahrie and Barnett-Loro, Carina. 2018. “To Support a Stronger Climate Movement, Focus Research on Building Collective Power.” Frontiers in Communication 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Hahrie, McKenna, Elizabeth, and Oyakawa, Michelle. 2021. Prisms of the People: Power & Organizing in Twenty-First-Century America. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2021. News Hole: The Demise of Local Journalism and Political Engagement. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, Abby S., Gillespie, James A., Derrick, Gemma E., et al. 2011. “Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways That Policymakers Use Public Health Researchers.” The Milbank Quarterly 89: 564–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hersh, Eitan. 2020. Politics Is for Power. Scribner.Google Scholar
Hilgartner, Stephen, Hurlbut, J. Benjamin, and Jasanoff, Sheila. 2021. “Was ‘Science’ on the Ballot?” Science 371: 893–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hird, John A. 2005. Power, Knowledge, and Politics: Policy Analysis in the States. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1966. Anti-intellectualism in American Life. Knopf.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E, and Sprague, John. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insel, Thomas. 2022. “What American Health Care Is Missing.” The Atlantic, February 13.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., Lomax Cook, Fay, and Delli Carpini, Michael X.. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalla, Joshua L., Seth Levine, Adam, and Broockman, David E.. 2022. “Personalizing Moral Reframing in Interpersonal Conversation: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Politics 84: 1239–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Mendelberg, Tali, and Shaker, Lee. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106: 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlan, Dean and Appel, Jacob. 2016. Failing in the Field. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H. and Quirk, Paul J.. 2001. “Conceptual Foundations of Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior 23: 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Amit and Epley, Nicholas. 2018. “Undervaluing Gratitude: Expressers Misunderstand the Consequences of Showing Appreciation.” Psychological Science 29: 1423–1435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacombe, Matthew J. 2021. Firepower: How the NRA Turned Gun Owners into a Political Force. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Leary, Mark R. 2010. “Affiliation, Acceptance, and Belonging: The Pursuit of Interpersonal Connection.” In Fiske, Susan T., Gilbert, Daniel T., and Lindzey, Gardner (Eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 864–897). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. and Stecula, Dominik A.. 2021. We Need to Talk: How Cross-Party Dialogue Reduces Affective Polarization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2015. American Insecurity: Why Our Economic Fears Lead to Political Inaction. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2019. “Why Social Science? Because It Tells Us How to Create More Engaged Citizens.” Why Social Science? Blog.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2020a. “Research Impact Through Matchmaking (RITM): Why and How to Connect Researchers and Practitioners.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53: 265–269.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2020b. “Why Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53: 712–717.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2021a. “How to Form Organizational Partnerships.” In Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P. (Eds.) Advances in Experimental Political Science (pp. 199–216). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2021b. “Single Conversations Expand Practitioners’ Use of Research: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54: 432–437.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2022. “Unmet Desire.” Issues in Science and Technology. Spring.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth and Day, Elizabeth. 2023. “Practitioners’ Demand for Research.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth and Matias, J. Nathan. 2021. “How to Generate Research Ideas That Impact Society.” Inside Higher Ed. April 22.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth and Mulligan, Danielle. 2020. “Chapter Matchmaking.” research4impact and Scholars Strategy Network Technical Paper.Google Scholar
Levine, Peter. 2022. What Should We Do? A Theory of Civic Life. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Janet C., Cunningham, Frances C., Carswell, Peter, and Braithwaite, Jeffrey. 2014. “Patterns of Collaboration in Complex Networks: The Example of a Translational Research Network.” BMC Health Services Research 14: 225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loyd, Denise Lewin, Wang, Cynthia S., Phillips, Katherine W., and Lount, Robert B., Jr. 2013. “Social Category Diversity Promotes Premeeting Elaboration: The Role of Relationship Focus.” Organization Science 24: 757–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lungeanu, Alina, Huang, Yun, and Contractor, Noshir S.. 2014. “Understanding the Assembly of Interdisciplinary Teams and Its Impact on Performance.” Journal of Informetrics 8: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence.” Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18: 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 2013. “Communicating Science in Politicized Environments.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 14048–14054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupia, Arthur. 2016. Uninformed: Why People Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, Krupnikov, Yanna, and Seth Levine, Adam. 2013. “Beyond Facts and Norms: How Psychological Transparency Threatens and Restores Deliberation’s Legitimating Potential.” Southern California Law Review 86: 459–493.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maruyama, Geoffrey and Westerhof, Lara. 2018. “Education: Building Trusted Partnerships with Schools.” In Tropp, Linda R. (Ed.) Making Research Matter (pp. 123–140). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
McGinty, Emma E., Siddiqi, Sameer, Linden, Sarah, Horwitz, Joshua, and Frattaroli, Shannon. 2019. “Improving the Use of Evidence in Public Health Policy Development, Enactment, and Implementation: A Multiple-Case Study.” Health Education Research 34: 129–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, Elizabeth and Han, Hahrie. 2014. Groundbreakers: How Obama’s 2.2 Million Volunteers Transformed Campaigning in America. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michener, Jamila. 2018. Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1956. On Liberty. Bobbs-Merrill. (Original published 1859).Google Scholar
Miller, Graham N. S., Lynn, Freda B., and McCloud, Laila I.. 2021. “By Lack of Reciprocity: Positioning Historically Black Colleges and Universities in the Organizational Field of Higher Education.” The Journal of Higher Education 92: 194–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Chris and Kirshenbaum, Sheril. 2009. Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Munson, Ziad. 2009. The Making of Pro-life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Vic. 1998. “Interorganizational Collaborations in the Nonprofit Sector.” In Shafirtz, J. M. (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 2 (pp. 1192–1196). Westview.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., Kennedy, Ryan P., Lazer, David M. J., and Sokhey, Anand. 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate – And Why?” American Political Science Review 104: 566–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., and Lazer, David M. J.. 2019. Politics with the People: Building A Directly Representative Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Tom. 2017. The Death of Expertise. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nutley, Sandra M., Walter, Isabel, and Davies, Huw T. O.. 2007. Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, Sides, John, and Tucker, Joshua. 2015. “APSA as Amplifier: How to Encourage and Promote Public Voices within Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 48: 90–93.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 2008. Democracy and Knowledge. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Kathryn, Innvar, Simon, Lorenc, Theo, Woodman, Jenny, and Thomas, James. 2014. “A Systematic Review of Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Research Evidence by Policymakers.” BMC Health Services Research 14: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. 2019. Why Trust Science? Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.” American Economic Review 100: 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott E. 2017. The Diversity Bonus. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palinkas, Lawrence A. and Soydan, Haluk. 2011. Translation and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pamuk, Zeynep. 2021. Politics and Expertise: How to Use Science in a Democratic Society. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pauli, Benjamin J. 2019. Flint Fights Back: Environmental Justice and Democracy in the Flint Water Crisis. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penuel, William R. and Gallagher, Daniel J.. 2017. Creating Research-Practice Partnerships in Education. Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Mark. A. 2018. “In the Shadow of Politics: The Pathways of Research Evidence to Health Policy Making.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 43: 341–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Katherine W. 2017. “What Is the Real Value of Diversity in Organizations? Questioning Our Assumptions.” In Page, Scott E. (Ed.) The Diversity Bonus (pp. 223–245). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
PielkeJr., Roger A. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Health on Call Podcast. 2021. “A Vaccine with That Haircut? Barber Shops and the Fight Against Covid-19.” July 28.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Democracy. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. and Feldstein, Lewis M.. 2003. Better Together. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2001. “Social Status and Group Structure.” In Michael, A. Hogg and Scott Tindale, R. (Eds.) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (pp. 352–375). Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, Kuipers, Kathy J., and Robinson, Dawn T.. 1998. “How Do Status Beliefs Develop? The Role of Resources and Interactional Experience.” American Sociological Review 63: 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. and Mark Hansen, John. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Lawrence S. 1992. Linking Citizens to Government: Interest Group Politics at Common Cause. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Jill, Greenhalgh, Trisha, Boynton, Petra, and Rigby, Marcia. 2004. “Soft Networks for Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice: Illuminative Evaluation of CHAIN.” BMJ 328: 1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 13: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Lynn. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25: 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandstrom, Gillian M. and Boothby, Erica J.. 2020. “Why Do People Avoid Talking to Strangers? A Mini Meta-Analysis of Predicted Fears and Actual Experiences Talking to a Stranger.” Self and Identity 20: 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel. 2016. “Saving Science.” The New Atlantis. Spring/Summer: 5–40.Google Scholar
Scheufele, Dietram A. 2014. “Science Communication as Political Communication.” PNAS 111: 13585–13592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sides, John. 2011. “The Political Scientist as a Blogger.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44: 267–271.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Betsy. 2012. The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy. University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2014. “How the Scholars Strategy Network Helps Academics Gain Public Influence.” Perspectives on Politics 12:695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Mario. 2009. “How Many Cases Do I Need? On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography 10: 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasser, Garold, Stewart, Dennis D., and Wittenbaum, Gwen M.. 1995. “Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31: 244-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasser, Garold, and Titus, William. 2003. “Hidden Profiles: A Brief History.” Psychological Inquiry 14: 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. and Hastie, Reid. 2015. Wiser. Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven and Schmitt, Mark. 2011. “The Elusive Craft of Evaluating Advocacy.” Stanford Social Innovation Review.Google Scholar
Tropp, Linda R. (Ed.). 2018. Making Research Matter: A Psychologist’s Guide to Public Engagement. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vacca, Raffaele, McCarty, Christopher, Conlon, Michael, and Nelson, David R.. 2015. “Designing a CSTA-Based Social Network Intervention to Foster Cross-Disciplinary Team Science.” Clinical and Translational Science 8: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dijk, Hans, Meyer, Bertolt, van Engen, Marloes, and Lewin Loyd, Denise. 2017. “Microdynamics in Diverse Teams: A Review and Integration of the Diversity and Stereotyping Literatures.” Academy of Management Annals 11: 517–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, Nella and Amos, Bryan. 2017. “Social Movement Coalitions: Formation, Longevity, and Success.” Sociology Compass 11: e12489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Lehman Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorauer, Jacquie D., Gagnon, Annette, and Sasaki, Stacey J.. 2009. “Salient Intergroup Ideology and Intergroup Interaction.” Psychological Science 20: 838–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, Richard. 1966. “Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs.” Papers on Non-Market Decision Making 1: 161–170.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L., Jr. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Dan J. and Soule, Sarah A.. 2012. “Social Movement Organizational Collaboration: Networks of Learning and the Diffusion of Protest Tactics, 1960–1995.” American Journal of Sociology 117: 1674–1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Dan J. and Soule, Sarah A.. 2016. “Tactical Innovation in Social Movements: The Effects of Peripheral and Multi-Issue Protest.” American Sociological Review 81: 517–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark R. 2001. Dry Bones Rattling: Community Building to Revitalize American Democracy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Rueben C., Forrow, Lachlan, Hodge, David Augustin, Sr., and Truog, Robert D.. 2020. “Trustworthiness before Trust – Covid-19 Vaccine Trials and the Black Community.” The New England Journal of Medicine 383: e121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, Carol H. 1989. “Congressional Committees as Users of Analysis.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8: 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Carol H. and Bucuvalas, Michael J. 1980. Social Science Research and Decision-Making. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1973. Political Organizations. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wojciszke, Bodgan. 1994. “Multiple Meanings of Behavior: Construing Actions in Terms of Competence or Morality.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Lingfei, Wang, Dashun, and Evans, James A.. 2019. “Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology.” Nature 566: 378–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyatt, Robert O., Katz, Elihu, and Kim, Joohan. 2000. “Bridging the Spheres: Political and Personal Conversation in Public and Private Spaces.” Journal of Communication 50: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×