Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:55:07.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Americans’ Lack of Political Beliefs and the Consequences for Democracy

from Economics and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2022

By
Yalidy Matos  and
Katherine McCabe
Edited by
Julien Musolino ,
Joseph Sommer  and
Pernille Hemmer
Julien Musolino
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Joseph Sommer
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Pernille Hemmer
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Democracy requires factual information and an attentive electorate. The electorate are a key part of a functioning democracy, where they choose between candidates, parties, and policies based on their own political beliefs, which are influenced by information. Because the world of politics is complex, human beings are bounded in their capabilities for decision making and must develop strategies to navigate through an overwhelming amount of political information to form beliefs and make decisions. Political belief systems – or “ideologies” – help people organize this complex political world. However, a large portion of the American public do not have a coherent political belief system, and instead rely on cues and elites to make decisions and form attitudes on the issues of the day. This kind of reliance is efficient, but can also lead people to become vulnerable to mis- and disinformation, fake news, conspiracy theories, and extreme polarization, which can have detrimental consequences for democracy.

Keywords

political beliefsideologydemocracymisinformationfake newsconspiracypartisan bias
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cognitive Science of Belief
A Multidisciplinary Approach
 , pp. 298 - 320
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2017) The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. The American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrajano, M. & Hajnal, Z. L. (2015) White backlash: immigration, race, and American politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, A. I. & Saunders, K. L. (2008) Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493Google Scholar
Albertson, B. & Gadarian, S. K. (2015) Anxious politics: democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005) Are political orientations genetically transmitted? The American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579Google Scholar
Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M. (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. The Journal of economic perspectives, 31(2), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211Google Scholar
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W. et al. (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – PNAS, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, M. & Pope, J. C. (2019). Does party trump ideology? Disentangling party and ideology in America. The American Political Science Review, 113(1), 38–54. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000795Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. & Cassese, E. C. (2017) American party women: a look at the gender gap within parties. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916675738Google Scholar
Bartels, L. (2003) Democracy with attitudes. In MacKuen, M. B., & Rabinowitz, G. (Eds.). Electoral democracy (pp. 48–82). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, B. (2009) The big sort: why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Brader, T. (2005) Striking a responsive chord: how political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, T. (2011) The political relevance of emotions: “Reassessing” revisited. Political Psychology, 32(2), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00803.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, J. G. (2009) Partisan bias and the Bayesian ideal in the study of public opinion. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, J. G. & Lenz, G. (2019) Partisan bias in surveys. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-050904Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015) Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014074Google Scholar
Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008) The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, P. J. & Feldman, S. (1984) Group identification, values, and the nature of political beliefs. American Politics Research, 12(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8401200202Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.). Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Cook, J., Linden, S. V. D., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. (2020) Coronavirus, “plandemic” and the seven traits of conspiratorial thinking. https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-plandemic-and-the-seven-traits-of-conspiratorial-thinking-138483Google Scholar
Dawson, M. C. (1994) Behind the mule: race and class in African-American politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. C. (2001) Black visions: the roots of contemporary African-American political ideologies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H. & Lopez, D. F. (1992) Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2001) The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. & McGrath, M. C. (2019) The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1Google Scholar
Edelson, J., Alduncin, A., Krewson, C., Sieja, J. A., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017) The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 933–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721061Google Scholar
Egan, P. J. (2012) Group cohesion without group mobilization: The case of lesbians, gays and bisexuals. British Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 597-616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000500Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. B. T. & Over, D. E. (1996) Rationality in the selection task: epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. Psychological Review, 103(2), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.356Google Scholar
Farhi, P. (2019) Mueller report suggests the ‘fake news’ came from trump, not the news media. www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/mueller-report-suggests-the-fake-news-came-from-trump-not-the-news-media/2019/04/18/ca96e574-61f7-11e9-9412-daf3d2e67c6d_story.html.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (1988) Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S. (2013) Political ideology. In Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of political psychology I, 2 ed. (pp. 591–626). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, E. A. (1938) Race consciousness among American negroes. The Journal of Negro Education, 7 (1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M. et al. (2020) Political sectarianism in America. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 370(6516), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. (2006) Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) The nature and origins of misperceptions: understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics: nature and origins of misperceptions. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394Google Scholar
Gadarian, S. K. & Albertson, B. (2014) Anxiety, immigration, and the search for information. Political Psychology, 53(2), 133–164.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12034Google Scholar
Gadarian, S. K. & Van Der Vort, E. (2018) The gag reflex: disgust rhetoric and gay rights in American politics. Political Behavior, 40(2), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9412-xGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010) Personality and political attitudes: relationships across issue domains and political contexts. The American Political Science Review, 104 (1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000031Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (1999) Why Americans hate welfare: race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goren, P. (2004) Political sophistication and policy reasoning: a reconsideration. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00081.xGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141Google Scholar
Graham, M. H. & Svolik, M. W. (2020) Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the united states. The American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052Google Scholar
Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002) Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2018) Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 us presidential campaign. European Research Council.Google Scholar
Hancock, A.-M. (2004) The politics of disgust: the public identity of the welfare queen. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hastie, R. & Park, B. (1986) The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258Google Scholar
Huddy, L. (2013) From group identity to political cohesion and commitment, 2nd ed. In Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 737–773). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. (2005) Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00144.xGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. & Hahn, K. S. (2009) Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.xGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D. R. (1987) News that matters. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the united states. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.  https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009) Politics across generations: family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090719Google Scholar
Jones-Correa, M. & Leal, D. L. (1996) Becoming “Hispanic”: secondary panethnic identification among Latin American-origin populations in the united states. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(2), 214–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863960182008Google Scholar
Kalmoe, N. P. & Mason, L. (2019) Lethal mass partisanship: prevalence, correlates, & electoral contingencies. Paper presented at the National Capital Area Political Science Association American Politics Workshop, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955) Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press.Google Scholar
Khanna, K. & Sood, G. (2018) Motivated responding in studies of factual learning. Political Behavior, 40(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9395-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, D. R. & Kalmoe, N. P. (2017) Neither liberal nor conservative: ideological innocence in the American public. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R. & Sanders, L. (1996) Divided by color: racial politics and democratic ideals. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, G., Schneer, B., & White, A. (2017) How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 358(6364), 776–780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao1100Google Scholar
Kuklinski, J., Cobb, M., & Gilens, M. (1997) Racial attitudes and the new south. Journal of Politics, 59(2), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998167Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1987) Motivated inference: self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(4), 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.108.3.480Google Scholar
Ladd, J. M. & Lenz, G. S. (2008) Reassessing the role of anxiety in vote choice. Political Psychology, 29(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00626.xGoogle Scholar
Lane, R. E. (1962) Political ideology: why the American common man believes what he does. Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Larry, M. B. (2002) Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021226224601Google Scholar
Lau, R. R. & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006) How voters decide: information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y. et al. (2018) The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998Google Scholar
Lee, T. (2008) Race, immigration, and the identity-to-politics link. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.051707.122615Google Scholar
Lenz, G. S. (2012) Follow the leader? How voters respond to politicians’ policies and performance. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.146Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. (2009) The partisan sort: how liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lien, P.-T. (2001) The making of Asian America through political participation. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2020) The paranoid style in American politics revisited: an ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12681Google Scholar
Lodge, M., McGraw, K., & Stroh, P. (1989) An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83 (2), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962397Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & Mackuen, M. (2000) Affective intelligence and political judgment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., Valentino, N. A., Vasilopoulos, P., & Foucault, M. (2019) Applying the theory of affective intelligence to support for authoritarian policies and parties. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12571Google Scholar
Margolis, M. F. (2018) From politics to the pews: how partisanship and the political environment shape religious identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2018) Uncivil agreement: how politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Masuoka, N. (2006) Together they become one: examining the predictors of pan ethnic group consciousness among Asian Americans and Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 993–1011.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00412.xGoogle Scholar
McClain, P., Carew, J. D. J., Walton, Eugene Jr., & Watts, C. S. (2009) Group membership, group identity, and group consciousness: measures of racial identity in American politics? Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.102452Google Scholar
Metaxas, P. T. & Mustafaraj, E. (2012) Social media and the elections. Science Magazine, 338(6106), 472–473. http://cs.wellesley.edu/~pmetaxas/Research/SCIENCE_PREPRINT.pdfGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016) Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: the moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (2002) Cross-cutting social networks: testing democratic theory in practice. The American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004264Google Scholar
Oliver, J. E. & Thomas, J. W. (2014) Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phoenix, D. L. (2019) The anger gap: how race shapes emotion in politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2007) Post-broadcast democracy: how media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015) You cannot be serious: the impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489–518. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014127Google Scholar
Radnitz, S. & Underwood, P. (2017) Is belief in conspiracy theories pathological? A survey experiment on the cognitive roots of extreme suspicion. British Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000556Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P. (2002) Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, G. (2006) The role of group consciousness in Latino public opinion. Political Research Quarterly (formerly WPQ), 59(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900311Google Scholar
Sanchez, G. & Masuoka, N. (2010) Brown-utility heuristic? The presence and contributing factors of Latino linked fate. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32(4), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986310383129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, B. F. & Luks, S. (2018) Misinformation or expressive responding? Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx042Google Scholar
Sears, D. O., Hensler, C. P., & Speer, L. K. (1979) Whites’ opposition to “busing”: Self-interest or symbolic politics? American Political Science Review, 73(2), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954885Google Scholar
Stokes, A. K. (2003) Latino group consciousness and political participation. American Politics Research, 31(4), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03031004002Google Scholar
Stroud, N. J. (2011) Niche news: the politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.xGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. C. & Fischer, F. (2021) Members of several well-known hate groups identified at capitol riot. www.propublica.org/article/several-well-known-hate-groups-identified-at-capitol-riot.Google Scholar
Valentino, N. A., Banks, A. J., Hutchings, V. L., & Davis, A. K. (2009) Selective exposure in the internet age: the interaction between anxiety and information utility. Political Psychology, 30(4), 591. www.propublica.org/article/several-well-known-hate-groups-identified-at-capitol-riot613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.xGoogle Scholar
Valentino-Devries, J., Ashford, G., Lu, D., Lutz, E., Matthews, A. L., & Yourish, K. (2021) Arrested in capitol riot: Organized militants and a horde of radicals. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/02/04/us/capitol-arrests.html?referringSource=articleShareGoogle Scholar
Wang, C. & Huang, H. (2020) When “fake news” becomes real: the consequences of false government denials in an authoritarian country. Comparative Political Studies, 54(5), 753–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020957672Google Scholar
White, I. K. & Laird, C. N. (2020) Steadfast democrats: how social forces shape black political behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yair, O. & Huber, G. A. (2021) How robust is evidence of partisan perceptual bias in survey responses? Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(2), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa024Google Scholar
Zaller, J. R. (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×