Part I - Fundamentals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing , pp. 13 - 104Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
References
Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.J. 2010, Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics, 2nd printing, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wachtor, A.J., Grinstein, F.F., DeVore, C.R., Ristorcelli, J.R., and Margolin, L.G. 2013, “Implicit large-eddy simulation of passive scalar mixing in statistically stationary isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 25(2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overholt, M.R. and Pope, S.B. 1996, “Direct numerical simulation of a passive scalar with imposed mean gradient in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 8(11), 3128–3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullin, D.I. 2000, “A vortex-based model for the subgrid flux of a passive scalar,” Phys. Fluids, 12(9), 2311–2319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, D.R. and Dimotakis, P.E. 1990, “Similarity of concentration field of gas-phase turbulent jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 218, 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristorcelli, J.R. 2006, “Passive scalar mixing: Analytic study of time scale ratio, variance, and mix rate,” Phys. Fluids, 18(7), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotoh, T., Watanabe, T., and Suzuki, Y. 2011, “Universality and anisotropy in passive scalar fluctuations in turbulence with uniform mean gradient,” J. Turb., 12(48), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F.F. 2010, “Vortex dynamics and transition to turbulence in free shear flows,” ch. 8 in Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics, 2nd printing, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F. 1999, “Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows,” AIAA Journal, 37(5), 544–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, D.H., Woodward, P.R., and Pouquet, A. 1998, “Inertial range structures in decaying turbulent flows,” Phys. of Fluids 10, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F. 2002, “Large eddy simulation of high Reynolds-number free and wall bounded flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 181, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A., Xiao, Z., and Smolarkiewicz, P. 2003, “Effective eddy viscosities in implicit large eddy simulations of turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids, 15, 3890–3893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G., Rider, W.J., and Grinstein, F.F. 2006, “Modeling turbulent flow with implicit LES,” Journal of Turbulence, 7, N15, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornber, B., Mosedale, A., and Drikakis, D. 2007, “On the implicit large eddy simulations of homogeneous decaying turbulence,” Journal of Computational Physics, 226, 1902–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnier, E., Mossi, M., Sagaut, P., Comte, P., and Deville, M. 1999, “On the use of shock-capturing schemes for large eddy simulation,” J. Comput. Phys. 153, 273–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rider, W.J. and Margolin, L.G. 2010, “Numerical regularization: The numerical analysis of implicit subgrid models,” ch. 5 in Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics, ed. by Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.J., 2nd printing, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, M.R. and Livescu, D. 2010, “Forcing for statistically stationary compressible isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 22(11), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimenez, J., Wray, A.A., Saffman, P.G., and Rogallo, R.S. 1993, “The structure of intense vorticity in isotropic turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech. 255, 65–90 832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. and Meneveau, C. 2005, “Origin of non-Gaussian statistics in hydrodynamic turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Letters, 95, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y., Perlman, E., Wan, M., Yang, Y., Burns, R., Meneveau, C., Burns, R., Chen, S., Szalay, A., and Eyink, G. 2008, “A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study Lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence,” J. Turbulence 9, N31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimotakis, P.E. 2000, “The mixing transition in turbulent flows,” J. Fluid Mech., 409, 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. 1992, “Kinematic alignment effects in turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids A, 4, 652–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachtor, A.J. 2012, “On the predictability of turbulent mixing with implicit large-eddy simulation,” PhD Thesis Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Blaisdell, G.A., Mansour, N.N., and Reynolds, W.C. 1994, “Compressibility effects on the passive scalar flux within homogeneous turbulence,” Phys. Fluids 6, 3498–3500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, C.W. 1969, “Computer studies of time-dependent turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids 12, II–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibliography
Nelkin, M., “Universality and scaling in fully developed turbulence,” Adv. in Phys., 43, 143–181, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., and Speziale, C.G., “Advances in the fundamental aspects of turbulence, energy transfer, interacting scales, and self-preservation in isotropic decay,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 51, 267, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P., and Kim, J., “Tracking turbulence with supercomputers,” Scientific American, 276, 62–68, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Matthaeus, W.H., and Dmitruk, P., “Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence and time scales in astrophysical and space plasma,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 76, 1015–1035, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G.K., Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1953.Google Scholar
Saddoughi, S.G. and Veeravalli, S.V., “Local isotropy in turbulent boundary layers at high Reynolds number,” J. Fluid Mech., 268, 333, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J., “Computing high-Reynolds-number turbulence: Will simulation ever replace experiments?,” J. Turbulence, 4(022), 1–14, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S.B., “Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows,” New J. Phys., 6(35), 1–24, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burattini, P., Lavole, P., and Antonia, R.A., “On the normalized energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 17(098103), 1–4, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K.R., “On the scaling of the turbulence energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 27, 1048–1051, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K.R., “An update on the energy dissipation rate in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 10, 528–529, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keneda, Y., Ishihara, T., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K., and Uno, A., “Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box,” Phys. Fluids, 15, L21–24, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B.R., Krogstad, P.-A., and van de Water, W., “Measurements of the turbulent energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 14, 1288–1290, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Hossain, M., and Vahala, G., “A critical look at the use of filters in large eddy simulation,” Phys. Lett. A, 139, 330–332, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, A., “Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows,” Adv. Geophy. S., 18A, 237–248, 1974.Google Scholar
Germano, M., “Differential filters for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids, 29, 1755–1757, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, J.A. and Moser, R.D., “Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 398, 321–346, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A. and Loh, K.-C., “The subgrid-scale estimation model in the physical space representation,” Phys. Fluids, 11, 2330–2342, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A. and Adams, N.A., “Direct modelling of subgrid scales of turbulence in large eddy simulations,” J. of Turbulence, 3(024), 1–19, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Eddy damping, backscatter, and subgrid stresses in subgrid modeling of turbulence, “Phys. Rev. A, 43, 7049–7052, 1991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y. and Vahala, G., “Reformulation of recursive-renormalization-group based subgrid modeling of turbulence,” Phys. Rev. E, 47, 2503–2519, 1993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraichnan, R.H., “Eddy viscosity in two and three dimensions,” J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1521–1536, 1976.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, T., Jauberteau, F., and Zhou, Y., “Influences of subgrid scale dynamics on resolvable scale statistics in large-eddy simulations,” Physica D, 100, 390–406, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H.A., “Eddy diffusivity, eddy noise, and subgrid-scale modelling,” J. Fluid Mech., 81, 719–734, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Vahala, G., and Hossain, M., “Renormalization-group theory for the eddy viscosity in subgrid modeling,” Phys. Rev. A, 37, 2590–2598, 1988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y., Vahala, G., and Hossain, M., “Renormalization eddy viscosity and Kolmogorov’s constant in forced Navier-Stokes turbulence,” Phys. Rev. A., 40, 5865–5874, 1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimotakis, P.E., “The mixing transition in turbulent flows,” J. Fluid Mech., 409, 69–98, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Unification and extension of the concepts of similarity criteria and mixing transition for studying astrophysics using high energy density laboratory experiments or numerical simulations,” Phys. Plasmas, 14, 082701, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Robey, H.F., and Buckingham, A.C., “Onset of turbulence in accelerated high-Reynolds-number flow,” Phys. Rev. E, 67, 056305, 1–11, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y., Remington, B.A., Robey, H.F., et al., “Progress in understanding turbulent mixing induced by Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instability,” Phys. Plasma, 10, 1883–1896, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A. and Rogallo, R.S., “Local energy transfer and non-local interactions in homogeneous, isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A, 2, 413–426, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Degree of locality of energy transfer in the inertial range,” Phys. Fluids A, 5, 1092–1094, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Interacting scales and energy transfer in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A, 5, 2511–2524, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Renormalization group theory for fluid and plasma turbulence,” Phys. Report, 488, 1, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraichnan, R.H., “Inertial range transfer in two- and three-dimensional turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 47, 525–535, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotoh, T. and Watanabe, T., “Statistics of transfer fluxes of the kinetic energy and scalar variance,” J. of Turbulence, 6(33), 1–18, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneda, Y., “Renormalization expansions in the theory of turbulence with the use of the Lagrangian position function,” J. Fluid Mech, 107, 131, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. and Oughton, S., “Nonlocality and the critical Reynolds numbers of the minimum state magnetohydrodynamic turbulence,” Phys. Plasma, 18, 072304, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Buckingham, A.C., Bataille, F., and Mathelin, L., “Manimum state for high Reynolds and Peclet number turbulent flows,” Phys. Lett. A., 373, 2746, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A., Liu, W., and Brachet, M. E., “An analysis of subgrid-scale interactions in numerically simulated isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A 5, 1747, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A., Liu, W., Hartel, C., and Kleiser, L., “Energy transfer in numerically simulated wall-bounded turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids, 6, 1583, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, D.O., Chen, S., Dolen, G.D., Kraichnan, R.H., Wang, L.P., and Zhou, Y., “Energy spectrum in the dissipation range of fluid turbulence,” J. Plasma Phys., 57, 195, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I., “The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their plane,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 201, 192, 1950.Google Scholar
Richtmyer, R. D., “Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 13, 297, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshkov, E. E., “Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave,” Izv., Acad. Sci., USSR Fluid Dyn., 4, 101, 1969.Google Scholar
Stokes, G.G., “On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums,” Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 9, 8, 1901.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J.L., First Course in Turbulence, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurricane, O.A., Hansen, J.F., Robey, H.F., et al., “A high energy density shock driven Kelvin–Helmholtz shear layer experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 16(5), p056305, 2008.Google Scholar
Haines, B.M., Grinstein, F.F., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Analysis of the effects of energy deposition on shock-driven turbulent mixing,” Phys. Plasma, 20(7), 072306, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welser-Sherrill, L., Fincke, J., Doss, F., et al., “Two laser-driven mix experiments to study reshock and shear,” High Energy Density Phys., 9(3), 496, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, B.M., Grinstein, F.F., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Simulation ensemble for a laser-driven shear experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 20(9), 092301, 2013.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F.F., Gowandhan, A.A., et al., “On coarse-grained simulations of turbulent material mixing,” Physica Scripta, 86(5), 058203, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalyk, V.A., Hansen, J.F., and Hurricane, O.A., “Experimental observations of turbulent mixing due to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability on the OMEGA Laser Facility,” Phys. Plasma, 19(9), 092702, 2012.Google Scholar
Gowandhan, A.A. and Grinstein, F.F., “Numerical simulation of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in shocked gas curtains,” J. Turbulence, 12, pN43, 2012.Google Scholar
Hurricane, O.A., Smalyk, V.A., Raman, K., et al., “Validation of a turbulent Kelvin–Helmholtz shear layer model using a high-energy-density OMEGA laser experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(15), 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Stefano, C.A., Kuranz, C.C., Keiter, P.A., et al., “Late-time breakup of laser-driven hydrodynamics experiments,” High Energy Density Phys., 8(4), 360, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurricane, O.A., Smalyk, V.A., Hansen, J.F., et al., “Measurements of turbulent mixing due to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in high-energy-density plasmas,” High Energy Density Phys., 9(1), 47, 2013.Google Scholar
Doss, F.W., Loomis, E.N., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Instability, mixing, and transition to turbulence in a laser-driven counterflowing shear experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 20(1), 012707, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, R.P., Harding, E.C., and Kuranz, C.C., “Approaches to turbulence in high-energy-density experiments,” Physica Scripta, 2008, p014022, 2008.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.G., editors, Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Grinstein, F.F., Wachtor, A.J., and Haines, B.M., “Estimating the effective Reynolds number in implicit large eddy simulation,” Phys. Rev. E., 89, 013303, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falkovich, G., “Bottleneck phenomenon in developed turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 6, 1411, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, P.K. and Zhou, Y., “Universality of the Kolmogorov constant in numerical simulations of turbulence,” Phys. Rev. E., 56, 1746, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
She, Z.S., Chen, S., Doolen, G., Kraichnan, R.H., and Orszag, S.A., “Reynolds number dependence of isotropic Navier-Stokes turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 3251, 1993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, N., Chen, S., and Doolen, G.D., “Statistics and structures of pressure in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 11, 2235, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.P., Chen, S., Brasseur, J.G., and Wyngaard, J.C., “Examination of hypotheses in the Kolmogorov refined turbulence theory through high- resolution simulations,” J. Fluid Mech., 309, 113, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F.F., Gowardhan, A.A., and Wachtor, A.J., 2011, “Simulations of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in planar shock-tube experiments,” Physics of Fluids, 23, 034106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F., “Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows,” AIAA Journal, 37, 544–556, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, D.H., Woodward, P.R., and Pouquet, A., “Inertial range structures in decaying turbulent flows,” Phys. of Fluids, 10, 237–245, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F., “Large eddy simulation of high Reynolds number free and wall bounded flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 181, 68, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Alsmeyer, H., 1976, “Density profiles in argon and nitrogen shock waves measured by the absorption of an electron beam,” J. Fluid Mech. 74, 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluie, H., 2013, “Scale decomposition in compressible turbulence,” Physica D 247, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspden, A., Nikiforakis, N., Dalziel, S., and Bell, J. B., 2008, “Analysis of implicit LES methods,” Comm. App. Math. Comp. Sci. 3, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethe, H., 1942 [1998], “On the theory of shock waves for an arbitrary equation of state,” Technical Report NDRC-B-237, office of Scientfic Research and Development. Reprinted in Classic Papers in Shock Compression Science, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Boris, J.P., 1990, “On large eddy simulation using subgrid turbulence models,” in Whither Turbulence? Turbulence at the Crossroads, ed. by Lumley, J.L., Springer-Verlag, 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boris, J.P., 2013, “Flux-corrected transport looks at forty,” Computers & Fluids 84, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boris, J.P., Book, D.L., 1973: “Flux-corrected transport: 1. SHASTA, A fluid transport algorithm that works,” J. Comp. Phys. 11, 38–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S. and Cowling, T.G., 1991, The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases: An Account of the Kinetic theory of Viscosity, Thermal Conduction and Diffusion in Gases, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, R.A., Ferziger, J.H., Reynolds, W.C., 1979, “Evaluation of subgrid scale models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 91, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colella, P. and Woodward, P.R., 1984, “The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations,” J. Comput. Phys. 54, 174–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrsin, S., 1974, “Limitations of gradient transport models in random walks and turbulence,” Adv. Geophys. 18 A, 25–60.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J.W., 1972, “Theoretical expression for the countergradient vertical heat flux,” J. Geophysical Res. 77, 5900–5904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyink, G.L., 1994, “Energy dissipation without viscosity in ideal hydrodynamics,” Physica D 78, 222–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyink, G.L., 2003, “Local 4/5-law and energy dissipation anomaly in turbulence,” Nonlinearity 16, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favre, A., 1983, “Turbulence: Spacetime statistical properties and behavior in supersonic flows,” Phys. Fluids 26, 2851–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foias, C., Sell, G.R., Temam, R., 1988, “Inertial manifolds for nonlinear evolutionary equations,” J. Differential Eqs. 73, 309–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foias, C., Holm, D.D., Titi, E.S., 2001, “The Navier–Stokes–alpha model of fluid turbulence,” Physica D 152, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, J.S and Davies, A.G., 1997, “Eddy viscosity and stocastic backscatter parameterizations on the sphere for atmospheric circulation models,” J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 2475–2492.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosal, S., 1996, “An analysis of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulence,” J. Comput. Phys. 125, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godunov, S.K. and Sergei, K., 1954, “Different Methods for Shock Waves,” PhD Dissertation, Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Grad, H., 1958, “Principles of the kinetic theory of gases,” in Handbuch der Physik Vol. XII, ed. by Flugge, S., Springer, 205–294.Google Scholar
Greenshields, C.J. and Reese, J.M., 2007, “The structure of shock waves as a test of Brenner’s modifications to the Navier-Stokes equations," J. Fluid Mech. 580, 407–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.J., 2007, Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S., 1971, An Introduction to the Theory of the Boltzmann Equation, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,.Google Scholar
Hirt, C.W., 1968, “Heuristic stability theory for finite difference equations,” J. Comput. Phys. 2, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, C.W., 1969, “Computer studies of time-dependent turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids Supplement II, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C-M. and Tai, Y-C., 1998, “Micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMs) and fluid flows,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 579–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, D.D., Marsden, J.E., and Ratiu, T.S., 1998, “Euler–Poincaré models of ideal fluids with nonlinear dispersion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4173–4176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D.A., Margolin, L.G., and Poje, A.C., 2002, “Accuracy and nonoscillatory properties of enslaved difference schemes,” J. Comput. Phys. 181, 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P.M. and Kieffer, R.S., 2015, “A note on finite-scale Navier–Stokes theory: the case of constant viscosity, strictly adiabatic flow,” Phys. Letters A 379, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, G.M., 2010, An Introduction to the Boltzmann Equation and Transport Processes in Gases, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M., 1959, Fluid Mechanics, Course of Theoretical Physics Vol. 6, Addison-Wesley, chapter 17.Google Scholar
Lax, P.D., 1952, “On discontinuous initial value problems for nonlinear equations and finite differences,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LAMS-1332.Google Scholar
Leith, C.E., 1990, “Stochastic backscatter in a subgridscale model,” Phys. Fluids A 2, 297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVeque, R.J., 2002, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P.F., Redondo, J.M., and Youngs, D.L., 1994, “Molecular mixing in Rayleigh-Taylor instability,” J. Fluid Mech. 265, 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majda, A. and Osher, S., 1977, “Propagation of error into regions of smoothness for accurate difference approximations to hyperbolic equations,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 30, 671–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G., 2009, “Finite-scale equations for compressible fluid flow,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 367, 2861–2871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margolin, L.G., 2014, “Finite scale theory: The role of the observer in classical fluid flow,” Mech. Res. Comm. 57, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G. and Rider, W.J., 2002, “A rationale for implicit turbulence modeling,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 39, 821–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G., Rider, W.J., and Grinstein, F.F., 2006, “Modeling turbulent flow with implicit LES,” J. Turbulence 7, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G., Ruppel, H.M., and Demuth, R. B., 1985, “Gradient Scaling for Nonuniform Meshes,” Proc. 4th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Laminar and Turbulent Flow, The University of Wales, Swansea, 1477.Google Scholar
Margolin, L.G. and Shashkov, M., 2005, “MPDATA: Gauge transformation, limiters and monotonicity,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 50, 1193–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G. and Shashkov, M., 2007, “Finite volume methods and the equations of finite scale: a mimetic approach,” Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 56, 991–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G., Smolarkiewicz, P.K., and Sorbjan, Z., 1999, “Large eddy simulations of convective boundary layers using nonoscillatory differencing,” Physica D 133, 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G., Smolarkiewicz, P.K., and Wyszogradzki, A.A., 2006, “Dissipation in implicit turbulence models: A computational study,” J. Appl. Mech. 73, 469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G. and Vaughan, D.E., 2012, “Traveling wave solutions for finite scale equations,” Mech. Res. Comm. 45, 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattiussi, C., 1997, “An analysis of finite volume, finite element and finite differences methods using some concepts from algebraid topology,” 133, 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, M.L., 1987, “Smoothing and the Second Law,” Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 64, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, X.B., Chen, S.Y., W.N. E, and Robbins, M.O., 2004, “A continuum and molecular dynamics hybrid method for micro- and nano-fluid flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 500, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, W.F., 1964, “CEL: a time-dependent two-dimensional coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian code,” in Methods in Computational Physics, ed. Alder, B.J.. Academic Press, 117–180.Google Scholar
Peierls, R.E., 1945, “Theory of von Neumann’s method of treating shocks,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-332.Google Scholar
Porter, D.H., Pouquet, A., and Woodward, P.R., 1994, “Kolmogorov-like spectra in decaying three-dimensional supersonic flows,” Phys. Fluids 6, 2133–2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, F., 1965, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics, McGraw-Hill, 475–476.Google Scholar
Ren, W. and Weinan, E, 2005, “Heterogeneous multiscale method for the modeling of complex fluids and micro–fluidics,” J. Comput. Phys. 204, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtmyer, R.D., 1948, ”Proposed numerical method for calculation of shocks,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-671.Google Scholar
Schmidt, B., 1969, “Electron beam density measurements in shock waves in argon,” J. Fluid Mech. 39, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F.G., 2007, “About Boussinesq’s turbulent viscosity hypothesis: Historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity,” C.R. Mecanique 335, 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, X., Yuan, X-F., and Chen, H., 2006, “Kinetic theory representation of hydrodynamics: A way beyond the Navier-Stokes equation,” J. Fluid Mech. 550, 413–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shashkov, M., 1996, Conservative Finite Diference Methods on General Grids, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, J., 1963, “ General circulation experiments with the primitive equations I. The basic experiment,” Mon. Wea. Rev. 91, 99–164.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, J., 1983, “The beginnings of numerical weather prediction and general circulation modeling: early recollections,” Adv. Geophys. 25, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolarkiewicz, P.K. and Margolin, L.G., 1998, “MPDATA: A finite-difference solver for geophysical flows,” J. Comput. Phys. 140, 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stull, R.B., 1991, “Review of non-local mixing in turbulent atmospheres: transilient turbulence theory,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology 62, 21–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tikhonov, A.N. and Samarskii, A.A., 1962, “Homogeneous difference schemes,” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 1, 5–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uribe, F.J., 2011, “The shock wave problem revisited: The Navier–Stokes equations and Brenner’s two velocity hydrodynamics,” in Coping with Complexity: Model Reduction and Data Analysis, ed. by Gorban, A.N. and Roose, D., Springer–Verlag, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leer, B., 1979, “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme 5: 2nd-order sequel to Godunov’s method,” J. Comput. Phys. 32, 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J. and Richtmyer, R.D., 1950, “A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks,” J. Appl. Phys. 21, 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesseling, P., 2001, Principles of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, M.L., 1964, “Calculation of Elastic-Plastic Flow,” in Methods in Computational Physics, ed. Alder, B.J., Academic Press, 211–263.Google Scholar
Wilkins, M.L., 1980, “Use of artificial viscosity in multidimensional fluid dynamic calculations,” J. Comput. Phys. 36, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S.A., Bell, J.B., and Garcia, A.L., 2008, “Algorithm refinement for fluctuating hydrodynamics,” Multiscale Model. Simul. 6, 1256–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckelmans, G., Wray, A., Vasilyev, O., and Jeanmart, O., 2001, “Explicit filtering large edddy simulation using the tensor diffusivity model supplemented by a dynamic Smagorinsky term,” Phys. Fluids 13, 1385–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Grinstein, F.F., Wachtor, A.J., and Haines, B.M., 2014, “Estimating the effective Reynolds number in implicit large eddy simulation,” Phys. Rev. E 89, 013303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Grinstein, F.F, Margolin, L.G., Rider, W.J. (2010). Implicit Large Eddy Simulation, 2nd printing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J.L. (1972). A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., Meneveau, C., and Katz, J. (1994). “On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet.” J. Fluid Mech. 275:83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardina, J., Ferziger, J.H., and Reynolds, W.C. (1980). “Improved turbulence models for large eddy simulation.” AIAA paper 80-1357.Google Scholar
Clark, R.A., Fertziger, J. H., and Reynolds, W. C. (1979). “Evaluation of subgrid models using accurately simulated turbulent flow.” J. Fluid Mech. 91:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galdi, G.P., Layton, W.J. (2000). “Approximating the larger eddies in fluid flows II: a model for space filtered flow.” Math. Models and Meth. in Appld. Sciences 10(3):343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G. and Rider, W.J. (2002). “A rationale for implicit turbulence modeling.” Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 39:821–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, L.G., Rider, W.J., and Grinstein, F.F. (2006). “Modeling turbulent flow with implicit LES.” J. Turbulence 7:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, C.W. (1968). “Heuristic stability theory for finite difference equations.” J. Comput. Phys. 2, 339355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F. (1999). “Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows.” AIAA Journal 37:544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyink, G. (2006). “Multi-scale gradient expansion of the turbulent stress tensor.” J. Fluid Mech. 549:159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristorcelli, J.R., Margolin, L.G., and Grinstein, F.F. (2011). “Moment analysis of Finite Scale Navier Stokes for coarse grained computations of turbulent mixing.” Los Alamos National Laboratory report: LA-UR-11-03387.Google Scholar
Lumley, J.L. (1978). “Computational modeling of turbulent flows.” Adv. Appl. Mech. 18:123–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachtor, A.J., Grinstein, F.F., DeVore, C.R., Ristorcelli, J.R., and Margolin, L.G. (2013). “Implicit large-eddy simulation of passive scalar mixing in statistically stationary isotropic turbulence.” Physics of Fluids 25(2), 025101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F.F., Gowardhan, A.A., Ristorcelli, J.R., Wachtor, A.J., and Gowardhan, A.J. (2012). “On coarse-grained simulations of turbulent material mixing.” Physica Scripta 86(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensow, R.E. and Fureby, C. (2008). “On the justification and extension of mixed models in LES.” J Turbulence, 8(54):1–17.Google Scholar
Boris, J.P. (1990). “On large eddy simulation using subgrid turbulence models.” In Whither Turbulence? Turbulence at the Crossroads, ed. by Lumley, J.L., Springer, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, W.J. (2000). “Approximating the larger eddies in fluid motion V: Kinetic energy balance of scale similarity models.” Math. Comp. Modelling 31:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leveque, R.J. (2002). Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overholt, M.R. and Pope, S. B. (1996). “Direct numerical simulation of a passive scalar with imposed mean gradient in isotropic turbulence.” Physics of Fluids 8, 3128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristorcelli, J.R. (2006). “Passive scalar mixing: analytic study of time scale ratio, variance and mix rate.” Phys. Fluids A 3:1269–1277.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, J. (1963). “General circulation experiments with primitive equations: I. Basic equations.” Mon. Weather Rev 91:99–264.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar