Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- PART I PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY
- 1 Plain Radiography of the Upper Extremity in Adults
- 2 Lower Extremity Plain Radiography
- 3 Chest Radiograph
- 4 Plain Film Evaluation of the Abdomen
- 5 Plain Radiography of the Cervical Spine
- 6 Thoracolumbar Spine and Pelvis Plain Radiography
- 7 Plain Radiography of the Pediatric Extremity
- 8 Plain Radiographs of the Pediatric Chest
- 9 Plain Film Radiographs of the Pediatric Abdomen
- 10 Plain Radiography in Child Abuse
- 11 Plain Radiography in the Elderly
- PART II ULTRASOUND
- PART III COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
- PART IV MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
- Index
- Plate Section
4 - Plain Film Evaluation of the Abdomen
from PART I - PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- PART I PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY
- 1 Plain Radiography of the Upper Extremity in Adults
- 2 Lower Extremity Plain Radiography
- 3 Chest Radiograph
- 4 Plain Film Evaluation of the Abdomen
- 5 Plain Radiography of the Cervical Spine
- 6 Thoracolumbar Spine and Pelvis Plain Radiography
- 7 Plain Radiography of the Pediatric Extremity
- 8 Plain Radiographs of the Pediatric Chest
- 9 Plain Film Radiographs of the Pediatric Abdomen
- 10 Plain Radiography in Child Abuse
- 11 Plain Radiography in the Elderly
- PART II ULTRASOUND
- PART III COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
- PART IV MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
- Index
- Plate Section
Summary
INDICATIONS
By far, the commonest indication for abdominal plain film radiography is abdominal pain. Other indications, as dictated by clinical circumstances, might include vomiting, nonspecific abdominal complaints, history of trauma, or unexplained fever. Because abdominal plain films provide specific information about only a few diseases and give indirect or nonspecific clues about a much larger number, the decision to order abdominal films is subject to a variety of case- and location-specific considerations. Mitigating factors that are case specific might include patient age, altered mental status, distracting injuries, medications (especially steroids and other immunosuppressive agents), and comorbid conditions (diabetes, other immunocompromising illnesses, or those predisposing to abdominal pathology). Location-specific considerations include the availability of alternative tests such as CT, MRI, and ultrasound that are both more sensitive and specific for many abdominal diseases. The availability of these modalities has a significant impact on the indications for, and utilization of, plain films. The use of these more sophisticated imaging modalities is addressed elsewhere in this text. However, in many cases, the more accurate and detailed information they provide comes at the expense of delays and/or the expenditure of personnel or financial resources. For this reason, and because in many locations physicians evaluate abdominal pain without rapid and easy access to advanced imaging, it is still useful to be familiar with significant plain film findings that might tailor the workup, direct supportive care, or mandate surgical interventions that preempt further imaging.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Emergency Radiology , pp. 65 - 90Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008