Book contents
- Classical Philology and Theology
- Classical Philology and Theology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter 1 Philology’s Shadow
- Chapter 2 Philology’s Roommate: Hermeneutics, Antiquity, and the Seminar
- Chapter 3 The Union and Divorce of Classical Philology and Theology
- Chapter 4 The Philology of Judaism: Zacharias Frankel, the Septuagint, and the Jewish Study of Ancient Greek in the Nineteenth Century
- Chapter 5 Source, Original, and Authenticity between Philology and Theology
- Chapter 6 Whose Handmaiden? ‘Hellenisation’ between Philology and Theology
- Chapter 7 Julian the Emperor on Statues (of Himself)
- Chapter 8 Boethius in the Genres of the Book: Philology, Theology, Codicology
- Chapter 9 Virgil, Creator of the World
- Chapter 10 Theology’s Shadow
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 10 - Theology’s Shadow
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 September 2020
- Classical Philology and Theology
- Classical Philology and Theology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter 1 Philology’s Shadow
- Chapter 2 Philology’s Roommate: Hermeneutics, Antiquity, and the Seminar
- Chapter 3 The Union and Divorce of Classical Philology and Theology
- Chapter 4 The Philology of Judaism: Zacharias Frankel, the Septuagint, and the Jewish Study of Ancient Greek in the Nineteenth Century
- Chapter 5 Source, Original, and Authenticity between Philology and Theology
- Chapter 6 Whose Handmaiden? ‘Hellenisation’ between Philology and Theology
- Chapter 7 Julian the Emperor on Statues (of Himself)
- Chapter 8 Boethius in the Genres of the Book: Philology, Theology, Codicology
- Chapter 9 Virgil, Creator of the World
- Chapter 10 Theology’s Shadow
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter offers a trenchant criticism of the discipline of classical philology as practised today. At its heart is a consideration of the Cambridge series, ‘Roman Literature and its Contexts,’ and the shifting view of classical philology that the series promotes. Above all, the chapter shows how the hold of the godlike author on the imagination of classical philologists is as strong as ever. The authority of a single source for meaning continues in many quarters to be upheld; its relation to the theology of monotheism remains unacknowledged. This critique is illuminated with a performance of an alternative mode of reading: a pliant, tentative, open-ended interpretation of one historically contingent text by one fallible, human, historically contingent reader. Uncovering the entanglement of classical philology and theology dethrones simultaneously both the godlike author and the godlike scholar.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Classical Philology and TheologyEntanglement, Disavowal, and the Godlike Scholar, pp. 199 - 224Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
- 1
- Cited by