Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:59:22.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Lea Niccolai
Lea Niccolai
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Christianity, Philosophy, and Roman Power
Constantine, Julian, and the Bishops on Exegesis and Empire
 , pp. 308 - 344
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalders, G. J. D. 1969. ‘ΝΟΜΟΣ ΕΜΨΥΧΟΣ’, in Steinmetz, P. (ed.), Politeia und Res Publica: Beiträge zum Verständnis von Politik, Recht und Staat in der Antike. Wiesbaden: Steiner, pp. 315–19.Google Scholar
Aalders, G. J. D. 1975. Political Thought in Hellenistic Times. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Addey, C. 2014. Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods. Farnham; Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. 1995. Homo sacer. Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. 2001. ‘Late Antique Iambics and Iambiké Idea’, in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A., and Barchiesi, A. (eds.), Iambic Ideas: Essays to a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 219–51.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. 1984. ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology 105: 174–208.Google Scholar
Akçai, K. N. 2019. Porphyry’s On the Cave of the Nymphs in Its Intellectual Context. Leiden; Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alföldi, A. 1948. The Conversion of Constantine and Pagan Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Alföldi, A. 1968. ‘Die verlorene enmannsche Kaisergeschichte und die Caesares des Julianus Apostata’, Bonner Historia-Augusta Colloquium 4: 1–8.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. 1974. ‘Crisis of the Third Century as Seen by Contemporaries’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 15: 89–111.Google Scholar
Allen, P., and Mayer, W.. 1999. John Chrysostom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alvino, M. C. 2019. Lo specchio del principe. L’ideologia imperiale a Costantinopoli tra IV e VI secolo d.C. Naples: Satura editrice.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2012. Imperial Rome AD 193 to 284: The Critical Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Antonova, S. E. 2018. Barbarian or Greek? The Charge of Barbarism and Early Christian Apologetics. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Asad, T. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Asmus, R. 1900. ‘Synesius und Dio Chrysostomus’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 9: 85–151.Google Scholar
Asmus, R. 1914. ‘Review of Geffcken 1914’, Wochenschrift für klassische Philologie 31: 515–25.Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2016. ‘Distinctive Readings: Callimachus and Roman Knights’, Philologia Antiqua 9: 21–32.Google Scholar
Atack, C. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s Pambasileia and the Metaphysics of Monarchy’, Polis 32: 297–320.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, P. 1977. ‘A Contribution to Mithraic Theology: The Emperor Julian’s Hymn to King Helios’, Journal of Theological Studies 28: 360–71.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, P. 1981. Julian and Hellenism: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, P., and Frede, M. (eds.) 1999. Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Badham, C. 1855. Platonis Philebus. London: J.W. Parker.Google Scholar
Baker-Brian, N. 2020. ‘“I have taken pains to get copies of them” (Athanasius, De Synodis 55): Epistolary Relations between the Sons of Constantine and the Christian Church’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 347–87.Google Scholar
Baker-Brian, N., and Tougher, S. (eds.) 2012. Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Baker-Brian, N., and Tougher, S. 2020. The Sons of Constantine, A.D. 337–361: In the Shadows of Constantine and Julian. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldi, I. 2012. Gli Inni di Sinesio di Cirene: vicende testuali di un corpus tardoantico. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1978. ‘The Caesares of Julian’, Klio 40: 449–66.Google Scholar
Ballériaux, O. 1994. ‘Themistius et le néoplatonisme. Le Nous pathêtikos et l’immortalité de l’âme’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 12: 171–200.Google Scholar
Balot, R. K. 2004. ‘Free Speech, Courage and Democratic Deliberation’ in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 232–59.Google Scholar
Barbagli, N. 2019. ‘Il perdono degli Alessandrini. Fortuna di un episodio di clemenza imperiale’, in Cecconi, G. A., Lizzi Testa, R., and Marcone, A. (eds.), The Past as Present: Essays on Roman History in Honour of Guido Clemente. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 43–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbagli, N. 2020. ‘The Emperors in the Province: A Study of the Tetrarchic Images from the Imperial Cult Chamber in Luxor’, in Guidetti, F. and Meinecke, K. (eds.), A Globalized Visual Culture? Towards a Geography of Late Antique Art. Oxford; Havertown: Oxbow Books, pp. 91–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbero, A. 2006. Barbari. Immigrati, profughi, deportati nell’impero romano. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Barbero, A. 2016. Costantino il vincitore. Rome: Salerno editrice.Google Scholar
Barceló, P. A. 2004. Constantius II. und seine Zeit: die Anfänge des Staatskirchentums. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Bardill, J. 2012. Constantine, Divine Emperor of the Christian Golden Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bardy, J. 1949. ‘Philosophie et philosophe dans le vocabulaire chrétien des premiers siècles’, Révue d’Ascétique et de Mystique 25: 97–108.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2015. Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics: A Greek Text and Annotated translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1975. ‘Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius’, American Journal of Philology 96: 173–86.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1976. ‘The Emperor Constantine’s Good Friday Sermon’, Journal of Theological Studies 27: 414–23.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1978. ‘Emperor and Bishops, A.D. 324–44: Some Problems’, American Journal of Ancient History 3: 53–75.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1984. ‘Constantine’s Prohibition of Pagan Sacrifice’, American Journal of Philology 105: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1986a. ‘Synesius in Constantinople’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 27: 93–112.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1986b. ‘When Did Synesius Become Bishop of Ptolemais?’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 27: 325–29.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1993. Athanasius and Constantius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1998. Ammianus and the Representation of Historical Reality. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 2001. ‘Constantine’s Speech to the Assembly of the Saints: Place and Date of Delivery’, Journal of Theological Studies 52: 26–36.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 2008. ‘Aspects of the Severan Empire, Part I: Severus as a New Augustus’, New England Classical Journal 35: 251–67.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 2011. Constantine: Dynasty, Religion, and Power in the Later Roman Empire. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D., and Vanderspoel, J.. 1981. ‘Julian and Themistius’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 22: 187–89.Google Scholar
Bartelink, G. M. 1970. Quelques observations sur παρρησία dans la littérature paléo-chrétienne. Nijmegen: Dekker & van de Vegt.Google Scholar
Bartelink, G. M. 1997. ‘Die Parrhesia des Menschen vor Gott bei Johannes Chrysostomus’, Vigiliae Christianae 51: 261–72Google Scholar
Bassett, S. 2004. The Urban Image of Late Antique Constantinople. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bausi, A., Reudenback, B., and Wimmer, H. (eds.) 2020. Canones: The Art of Harmony: The Canon Tables of the Four Gospels. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baynes, N. H. 1929. Constantine the Great and the Christian Church. London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Baynes, N. H. 1955. ‘The Thought-World of East Rome’, in Byzantine Studies and Other Essays. London: Historical Association, pp. 24–46.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1986. ‘Cicero and Divination: The Formation of a Latin Discourse’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 33–46.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2014. Laughter in Ancient Rome: On Joking, Tickling, and Cracking Up. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beckwith, C. L. 2005. ‘The Condemnation and Exile of Hilary of Poitiers at the Synod of Béziers (356 C.E.)’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 13: 21–38.Google Scholar
Benedict, J. L. 2018. ‘Truth to Power: The Politics of Theological Free Speech in the Cappadocian Fathers and Augustine of Hippo’. Diss. Duke University.Google Scholar
Béranger, J. 1948. ‘Le réfus du pouvoir’, Museum Helveticum 5: 178–96.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. 1998. Die Strahlen der Heerscher. Theomorphes Herrscherbild und politische Symbolik im Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern.Google Scholar
Bidez, J. 1930. La vie de l’Empereur Julien. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bidez, J. 1932. L’empereur Julien. Œuvres complètes, I.1 Discours de Julien César. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bidez, J., and Cumont, F.. 1922. Iuliani imperatoris Epistulae Leges Poematia Fragmenta varia. Paris; Oxford: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, B. 1994. ‘Constantina, Vetranio, und Gallus Caesar’, Chiron 24: 29–68.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, B. 1997. ‘Ein Kaiser als Prediger: zur Datierung der konstantinischen Rede an die Versammlung der Heligen’, Hermes 125: 183–202.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, B. 1999. ‘Die Schlacht von Mursa und die zeitgenössische Deutung eines spätantiken Bürgerkrieges’, in Brandt, H. (ed.), Gedeutete Realität. Krisen, Wirklichkeiten, Interpretationen (3.–6. Jh. N. Chr.). Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 47–102.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, B. 2012. ‘Sources for the History of Constantine’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 14–32.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, B. 2020. ‘From Caesar to Augustus: Julian against Constantius’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 97–123.Google Scholar
Blockley, R. C. 1981. The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire: Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus. Liverpool: Cairns.Google Scholar
Blockley, R. C. 1983. The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire: Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus. Vol. 2: Text, Translation and Historiographical Notes. Liverpool: Cairns.Google Scholar
Borrelli, D. 2003. ‘Il sacerdos del De Mysteriis e il sacerdos di Giuliano’, in Criscuolo, U. (ed.), Da Costantino a Teodosio il Grande. Cultura, Società, Diritto. Naples: D’Auria, pp. 105–17.Google Scholar
Borrelli, D. 2018. ‘Identità e funzioni dello hiereus nel ‘religious revival’ di Massimino Daia e Giuliano imperatore’, in Dainese, D. and Gheller, V. (eds.), Beyond Intolerance: The Milan Meeting in AD 313 and the Evolution of the Imperial Religious Policy from the Age of the Tetrarchs to Julian the Apostate. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 67–104.Google Scholar
Bosworth, B. 1999. ‘Augustus, the Res Gestae, and Hellenistic Theories of Apotheosis’, Journal of Roman Studies 89: 1–18.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, J. 1992. L’Empereur Julien et la culture de son temps. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, J. 2004. ‘Philosophie et antichristianisme chez l’empereur Julian’, in Narcy, M. and Rebillard, É. (eds.), Hellénisme et Christianisme. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, pp. 111–31.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, J. 2005. ‘La lettre de Julien à Themistius: Histoire d’une fausse manœuvre et d’un désaccord essentiel’, in González Gálvez, Á. and Malosse, P.-L. (eds.), Mélanges A.F. Norman. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient méditerranéen, pp. 113–38.Google Scholar
Boulnois, M.-O. 2020. ‘Le prologue de l’évangile de Jean au cœur de la polémique entre l’empereur Julien et Cyrille d’Alexandrie’, in Huber-Rebenich, G. and Rebenich, S. (eds.), Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. Und 5. Jahrhundert. Julian Contra Gailaeos-Kyrill Contra Iulianum. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 195–227.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1986. ‘The Forms of Capital’, in Richardson, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–58.Google Scholar
Boyarin, D. 2004. Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Boyarin, D. 2010. ‘Origen as Theorist of Allegory: Alexandrian Contexts’, in Copeland, and Struck, (eds.), pp. 39–54.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2001. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of Its Development from The Stoics to Origen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.) 2003. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2016. ‘Providence and Religion in Middle Platonism’, in Eidinow, E., Kindt, J. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Theologies of ancient Greek religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–38.Google Scholar
Bowen, A., and Garnsey, P.. 2003. Lactantius: Divine Institutes. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1978. Julian the Apostate. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1982. ‘The Emperor Julian on His Predecessor’, Yale Classical Studies 27: 159–72.Google Scholar
Bowman, A. 2005. ‘Diocletian and the first Tetrarchy, A.D. 284–305’, Cambridge Ancient History XII: 67–88.Google Scholar
Bradbury, S. 1987. ‘The Date of Julian’s Letter to Themistius’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 28: 235–52.Google Scholar
Bradbury, S. 1994. ‘Constantine and the Problem of Anti-Pagan Legislation in the Fourth Century’, Classical Philology 89: 120–39.Google Scholar
Bradbury, S. 2020. ‘Julian and the Jews’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 267–92.Google Scholar
Brakke, D. 1995. Athanasius and the Politics of Asceticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 1985. Rhetorike philosophousa. Dione Crisostomo nella cultura antica e bizantina. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Branham, R. B. 1989. Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the comedy of traditions. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bransbourg, G. 2009. ‘Julien, l’immunitas Christi, les dieux et les cités’, Antiquité Tardive 17: 151–58.Google Scholar
Breebaart, A. B. 1979. ‘Eunapius of Sardes and the Writing of History’, Mnemosyne 32: 360–75.Google Scholar
Bregman, J. 1982. Synesius of Cyrene, Philosopher–Bishop. Berkeley; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, B. 1976. ‘Dating Athanasius’ Vita Antonii’, Vigiliae Christianae 39: 209–27.Google Scholar
Brennecke, H. C. 1994. ‘Nicäa’, Theologische Realenziklopädie 24: 429–41.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. 1995. ‘L’empereur Claude comme auteur des ‘Tyrrhenika’, in Briquel, D. and Guittard, C. (eds.), Les écrivains et l’Etrusca disciplina de Claude à Trajan. Tours: Université de Tours, pp. 88–93.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1990. ‘L’Oracle d’Apollon dans la vie de Plotin’, Kernos 3: 77–88.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1996. Introduction à la philosophie du mythe. Tome 1: Sauver les myths. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 1988. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 1992. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Browning, R. 1952. ‘The Riot of A.D. 387 in Antioch: The Role of Theatrical Claques in the Later Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies 42: 13–20.Google Scholar
Browning, R. 1975. The Emperor Julian. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Bruch, J., and Hermann, K.. 2012. ‘The Reception of the Philosopher-King in Antiquity and the Medieval Age’, in van Ackeren, M. (ed.), A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Chichester; Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell, pp. 483–96.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1977. ‘Lex de imperio Vespasiani’, Journal of Roman Studies 67: 95–116.Google Scholar
Bryan, J. 2012. Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Burckhardt, J. 1853. Die Zeit Constantins des Großen. Basel: Schweighauser’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, D. W. P. 2020. ‘Neoplatonic Philosophy in Tetrarchic and Constantinian Panegyric’, in Ross, and Omissi, (eds.), pp. 167–89.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, D. W. P., and Ross, A. J. (eds.) 2018. Imagining Emperors in the Later Roman Empire. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Burgess, R. 2008. ‘The Summer of Blood: the ‘Great Massacre’ of 337 and the Promotion of the Sons of Constantine’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 62: 5–51.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M., and Frede, M.. 2015. The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caltabiano, M. 1991. L’epistolario di Giuliano Imperatore. Saggio storico, traduzione, note e testo in appendice. Naples: D’Auria.Google Scholar
Cameron, Al. 1987. ‘Earthquake 400’, Chiron 17: 343–60.Google Scholar
Cameron, Al. 2011. The Last Pagans of Rome. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Al., and Long, J.. 1993. Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Av. 1965. ‘Procopius and the Church of St. Sophia’, Harvard Theological Review 58: 161–63.Google Scholar
Cameron, Av. 1991. Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development of Christian Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Av. 1997. ‘Eusebius’ Vita Constantini and the Construction of Constantine’, in Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–74.Google Scholar
Cameron, Av. 1998. ‘The Perception of Crisis’, Settimane di studio del centro italiano sull’alto medioevo 45: 9–31.Google Scholar
Cameron, Av. 2005. ‘The Reign of Constantine, A.D. 306–337’, Cambridge Ancient History XII: 90–109.Google Scholar
Cameron, Av., and Hall, S. G.. 1999. Life of Constantine. Eusebius. Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, F. 2019. Diocleziano. Milan: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cartwright, S. 2016. ‘Athanasius’ Vita Antonii as Political Theology: The Call of Heavenly Citizenship’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 67: 241–64.Google Scholar
Célérier, P. 2013. L’ombre de l’empereur Julian: le destine des écrits de Julien chez les auteurs païens et chrétiens du IVe au Vie siècle. Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris Ouest.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2000. ‘Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Early Empire’, in Rowe, and Schofield, (eds.), pp. 559–83.Google Scholar
Cerutti, M. V. 2010. ‘‘Pagan Monotheism’? Towards a Historical Typology’, in Mitchell, S. and Van Nuffelen, P. (eds.), Monotheism between Pagans and Christians in Late Antiquity. Leuven; Walpole, MA: Peeters, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. 2001. The Church in Ancient Society: From Galilee to Gregory the Great. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chantraine, H. 1993–94. ‘Die Kreuzesvision von 351 – Fakten und Probleme’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 86–87: 430–41.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2015. ‘La Lettera a Temistio di Giuliano imperatore e il dibattito filosofico nel IV secolo’, in Marcone, (ed.), pp. 149–71.Google Scholar
Chin, C. M. 2008. Grammar and Christianity in the Late Roman World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Civiletti, M. 2007. Eunapio. Vite di Filosofi e Sofisti. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 1989. Iamblichus, On the Pythagorean Life. Translated with notes and introduction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 2000a. ‘Philosophic Lives and the Philosophic Life. Porphyry and Iamblichus’, in Hagg, T. and Rousseau, P. (eds.), Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 2000b. Porphyry. On Abstinence from Killing Animals. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 2004. Christianity and Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. C. 1998. ‘Communication, Human and Divine. Saloustious Reconsidered’, Phronesis 43: 326–50.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. C. 2004. Iamblichus, De mysteriis. Translated with an introduction and notes by E. C. Clarke, J. M. Dillon, and J. P. Hershbell. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cocchini, F. 2006. Origene. Teologo esegeta per un’identità cristiana. Bologna: EDB.Google Scholar
Conti, S. 2009. ‘Da eroe a dio: la concezione teocratica del potere in Giuliano’, Antiquité Tardive 17: 119–26.Google Scholar
Conybeare, C., and Goldhill, S. (eds.) 2021a. Classical Philology and Theology: Entanglement, Disavowal, and the Godlike Scholar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conybeare, C., and Goldhill, S.. 2021b. ‘Philology’s Shadow’, in Conybeare, and Goldhill, (eds.), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Coogan, J. 2021. ‘Transforming Textuality: Porphyry, Eusebius, and Late Ancient Tables of Contents’, Studies in Late Antiquity 5: 6–27.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. 2007. ‘Septimius Severus: the Augustan Emperor’, in Swain, S., Harrison, S. J., and Elsner, J. (eds.), Severan Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–93.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. 2009. Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Text, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. 1992. ‘Insinuation of Womanly Influence: An Aspect of the Christianisation of the Roman Aristocracy’, Journal of Roman Studies 82: 150–64.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. 1996. The Virgin and the Bride: Idealized Womanhood in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. 2019. ‘Constantine the Populist’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 27: 241–70.Google Scholar
Copeland, R., and Struck, P. T. (eds.) 2010. The Cambridge Companion to Allegory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. 1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corcoran, D. 1997. The Empire of the Tetrarchs: Imperial Pronouncements and Government, AD 284–324. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Corcoran, D. 2013. ‘The Gregorianus and Hermogenianus Assembled and Shattered’, Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome 125: 285–304.Google Scholar
Corke-Webster, J. 2019. Eusebius and Empire: Constructing Church and Rome in the Ecclesiastical History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corke-Webster, J. 2020a. ‘How to Praise a Christian Emperor: The Panegyrical Experiments of Eusebius of Caesarea’, in Omissi, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 143–65.Google Scholar
Corke-Webster, J. 2020b. ‘A Bishop’s Biography: Eusebius of Caesarea’s Life of Constantine’, in de Temmerman, K. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Ancient Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 297–312.Google Scholar
Cox, P. 1983. Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox Miller, P. ‘Strategies of Reprentation in Collective Biography: Constructing the Subject as Holy’, in Hägg, and Rousseau, (eds.), pp. 209–54.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. R. 2019. The Eusebian Canon Tables: Ordering Textual Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, W. S. 1901. Synesius the Hellene. London: Rivingtons.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 2013. Libanius the Sophist: Rhetoric, Reality, and Religion in the Fourth Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Criscuolo, U. 1983. ‘Sull’epistola di Giuliano Imperatore al filosofo Temistio’, Koinonia 7: 89–111.Google Scholar
Criscuolo, U. 2001. ‘La religione diGiuliano’, Mediterraneo Antico 4: 365–88.Google Scholar
Criscuolo, U. 2012. ‘Sinesio di Cirene tra neoplatonismo e teologia patristica’, in Seng, and Hoffmann, (eds.), pp. 164–82.Google Scholar
Cristofoli, R. 2005. Costantino e l’Oratio ad sanctorum coetum. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Curta, F. 1995. ‘Atticism, Homer, Neoplatonism, and Fürstenspiegel: Julian’s Second Panegyric on Constantius’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 36: 177–211.Google Scholar
Dagron, G. 1968. L’Empire romain d’Orient au IVe siècle et les traditions politiques de l’hellénisme. Le témoignage de Thémistios. Paris: de Broccard.Google Scholar
Damgaard, F. 2013. ‘Propaganda against Propaganda. Revisiting Eusebius’ Use of the Figure of Moses in the Life of Contantine’, in Johnson, and Schott, (eds.), pp. 115–49.Google Scholar
Davies, J. P. (2004) Rome’s Religious History: Livy, Tacitus, and Ammianus on their Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, D. 1992. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Acient Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dearn, A. 2003. ‘The Coinage of Vetranio: Imperial Representation and the Memory of Constantine the Great’, Numismatic Chronicle 163: 169–91.Google Scholar
De Blois, L. 1976. The Policy of Emperor Gallienus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
De Blois, L. 2002. ‘The Crisis of the Third Century A.D. in the Roman Empire: A Modern Myth?’, in De Blois, L. and Rich, J. (eds.), The Transformation of Economic Life under the Roman Empire: Proceedings of the Second Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire. Amsterdam: Gieben, pp. 204–17.Google Scholar
Demoen, K. 1996. Pagan and Biblical Exempla in Gregory Nazianzen: A Study in Rhetoric and Hermeneutic. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Den Boeft, J., Drijvers, J. W., den Hengst, D., and Teitler, H. C. (1995) Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXII. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
DePalma Digeser, E. 2000. The Making of a Christian Empire: Lactantius and Rome. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. 1978. Dione di Prusa. Un intellettuale greco nell’impero romano. Messina; Florence: G. d’Anna.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. 2012. ‘Introduzione’, in Vagnone, (ed.), pp 7–21.Google Scholar
De Vita, M. C. 2006. ‘Socrate filosofo politico e maschera letteraria nelle orazioni di Temistio: strategie di appropriazione di un mito’, in De Gregorio, G. and Medaglia, S. M. (eds.), Tradizione, ecdotica, esegesi. Miscellanea di studi. Naples: Arte Tipografica, pp. 7–41.Google Scholar
De Vita, M. C. 2010. ‘Cibele Neoplatonica: alcune osservazioni sull’inno giulianeo Alla Madre degli dèi (or. 8 Rochefort)’, in Talamo, C. (ed.), Saggi di commento a testi greci e latini. Pisa: ETS, pp. 154–77.Google Scholar
De Vita, M. C. 2011. Giuliano imperatore filosofo neoplatonico. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
De Vita, M. C. 2013. ‘Alcune variazioni sul mito di Socrate nella tarda antichità’, χώρα 11: 37–58.Google Scholar
De Vita, M. C. 2014. ‘Una nobile gara di pietà: il dibattito interreligioso nel panegirico di Temistio a Gioviano’, in Coppola, M., Fernicola, G. and Pappalardo, L. (eds.), Dialogus. Il dialogo fra le religioni nel pensiero tardo-antico, medievale e umanistico. Rome: Città Nuova, pp. 119–34.Google Scholar
De Vita, M. C. 2017a. ‘Giuliano l’Apostata e il Vangelo di Giovanni’, Koinonia 41: 147–67.Google Scholar
De Vita, M. C. 2017b. ‘Giuliano Imperatore e il culto delle immagini sacre: un esempio di philosophia telestike?’, in Canetti, L. (ed.), Statue. Rituali, Scienze e Magia dalla Tarda Antichità al Rinascimento. Florence: Sismel, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar
De Vita, M. C. 2022. Giuliano imperatore: Lettere e discorsi. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
DeVore, D. J. 2013. ‘Greek Historiography, Roman Society, Christian Empire: The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius of Caesarea’. Diss. University of California.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1986. ‘Plutarch and Second Century Platonism’, in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.), Classical Mediterranean Spirituality: Egyptian, Greek, Roman. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 214–29.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2001. ‘The Neoplatonic Reception of Plato’s Laws’, in Lisi, (ed.), pp. 241–54,Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2006. ‘Pedantry and Pedestrianism? Some Reflections on the Middle Platonic Commentary Tradition’, in Tarrant, H. and Baltzly, D. (eds.), Reading Plato in Antiquity. London: Duckworth, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2012. ‘The Theology of Julian’s Hymn to King Helios’, in Dillon, J. (ed.), The Platonic Heritage. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum, pp. 103–15.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M., and Gerson, L. P.. 2004. Neoplatonic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. N. 2012. The Justice of Constantine: Law, Communication, and Control. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dolezal, S. 2006. ‘Johannes Chrysostomos and the Goths’, Acta Universitatis Carolinae 2: 165–85.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1981. ‘Die Andere Theologie: Wie stellten die frühchristlichen Theologien des 2.–4. Jahrhunderts ihren Lesern die ‚Griechische Weisheit’ (= den Platonismus) dar?’, Theologie und Philosophie 56: 1–46.Google Scholar
Dörries, H. 1954. Das Selbstzeugnis Kaiser Konstantins. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Dossey, L. 2010. Peasants and Empire in Christian North Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Downey, G. 1959. ‘The Name of the Church of St. Sophia in Constantinople’, Harvard Theological Review 52: 37–41.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 1976. In Praise of Constantine: A Historical Study and New Translation of Eusebius’ Tricennial Orations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 1988. ‘What Eusebius Knew: The Genesis of the Vita Constantini’, Classical Philology 83: 20–38.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 2000. Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 2012a. ‘The Impact of Constantine on Christianity’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 111–36.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 2012b. ‘But I Digress … Rhetoric and Propaganda in Julian’s Second Oration to Constantius’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 35–46.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 2020. A Century of Miracles: Christians, Pagans, Jews, and the Supernatural, 312–410. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, J. F. 1983. ‘The ‘Pagan Underground’, Constantius II’s ‘Secret Service’ and the Usurpation and Survival of Julian the Apostate’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History III. Brussels: Latomus, pp. 348–87.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, J. F. 2005. ‘Maximinus to Diocletian and the “crisis”’, Cambridge Ancient History XII: 28–66.Google Scholar
Drijvers, J. W. 2004. Cyril of Jerusalem: Bishop and City. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Drozdek, A. 2007. Greek Philosophers as Theologians: The Divine Arche. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. 2004. ‘Economic Change and the Transition to Late Antiquity’, in Swain, S. and Edwards, M. (eds.), Approaching Late Antiquity: The Transformation from Early to Late Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20–52.Google Scholar
Dvornik, F. 1955. ‘The Emperor Julian’s “Reactionary” Ideas on Kingship’, in Weitzmann, K. et al. (eds.), Late Classical and Medieval Studies in Honor of Albert Mathias Rend. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 71–81.Google Scholar
Dvornik, F. 1966. Early Christian and Byzantine Political Philosophy: Origins and Background. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies.Google Scholar
Easterling, P., and Miles, R.. 1996. ‘Dramatic Identities: Tragedy in late Antiquity’, in Miles, R. (ed.), Constructing Identities in late Antiquity. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 95–111.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 1995. ‘The Arian Controversy and the Oration to the Saints’, Vigiliae Christianae 49: 379–87.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 2003. Constantine and Christendom: The Oration to the Saints; the Greek and Latin Accounts of the Discovery of the Cross; the Edict of Constantine to Pope Silvester. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 2006. ‘The First Council of Nicaea’, The Cambridge History of Christianity. Origins to Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 552–67.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 2018. Catholicity and Heresy in the Early Church. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elliott, T. G. 1987. ‘Constantine’s Conversion: Do We Really Need It?’, Phoenix 41: 420–38.Google Scholar
Elm, S. 1997. ‘Isis’ Loss – Gender, Dependence and Ethnicity in Synesius’ de providentia or Egyptian Tale’, Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum 1: 86–115.Google Scholar
Elm, S. 2012. Sons of Hellenism, Fathers of the Church: Julian the Emperor, Gregory of Nazianzus and the Vision of Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elm, S. 2013. ‘Priest and Prophet: Gregory of Nazianzus’ concept of Christian leadership as Theosis’, in Stroumsa, G., Parker, R. and Dignas, B. (eds.), Priests and Prophets in the Roman World. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 162–84.Google Scholar
Elm, S. 2021. ‘Julian the Emperor on Statues (of Himself)’, in Conybeare, and Goldhill, (eds.), pp. 128–48.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1996. ‘Inventing Imperium: Texts and the Propaganda of Monuments’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–53.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2000. ‘From the Culture of Spolia to the Cult of Relics: The Arch of Constantine and the Genesis of Late Antique Forms’, Papers of the British School at Rome 68: 149–84.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2012. ‘Perspectives in Art’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 255–77.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2020. ‘Introduction’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Empires of Faith in Late Antiquity: Histories of Art and Religion from India to Ireland. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Elsner, J., and Hernández Lobato, J. (eds.) 2017. The Poetics of Late Latin Literature. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Errington, M. 1997. ‘Church and State in the First Years of Theodosius I’, Chiron 27: 36–41.Google Scholar
Errington, M. 2000. ‘Themistius and His Emperors’, Chiron 30: 861–904.Google Scholar
Errington, M. 2006. Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Eshleman, K. 2012. The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire: Sophists, Philosophers, and Christians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esmonde Cleary, A. S. 2013. The Roman West, AD 200–500: An Archaeological Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falls, T. B. 2003. St. Justin Martyr. Dialogue with Trypho. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Favale, A. 1958. Teofilo di Alessandria. Scritti, vita e dottrina. Turin: Società editrice internazionale.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1988. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts and Beliefs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fejfer, J. 2008. Roman Portraits in Context. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Feissel, D. 2009. ‘Les acts de l’Etat impérial dans l’épigraphie tardive (324–610). Prolégomènes à un inventaire’, in Haensch, R. (ed.), Selbstdarstellung und Kommunikation. Die Veröffentlichung staatlicher Urkunden auf Stein und Bronze in der Römischen Welt. Munich: Beck, pp. 97–128.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1991. Clement of Alexandria, Stromateis. Books One to Three. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Ferrar, W. J. 1920. The Proof of the Gospel Being the Demonstratio Evangelica of Eusebius of Caesarea. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. 1990. ‘Plato and Poetry’, in Kenney, G. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–148.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, A. 2018. The Specter of the Jews: Emperor Julian and the Rhetoric of Ethnicity in Syrian Antioch. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. 1992–93. ‘Ritratti maschili privati di epoca adrianea. Problemi della loro varietà’, Scienze dell’antichità. Storia, archeologia, antropologia 6/7: 445–85.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. 1997. ‘Privatporträts hadrianischer Zeit’, in Bouzek, J. and Ondrejová, I. (eds.), Roman Portraits: Artistic and literary. Mainz: von Zabern, pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, A. 1930. The Essays and Hymns of Synesius of Cyrene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. 1999. ‘Über die Grenzen der Akkulturation: Wider die Verdinglichung des Kulturbegriffs’, in Vogt-Spira, G., Rommel, B., and Musäus, I. (eds.), Rezeption und Identität: die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 81–112.Google Scholar
Flower, R. 2012. ‘Visions of Constantine’, Journal of Roman Studies 102: 287–305.Google Scholar
Flower, R. 2013. Emperors and Bishops in Late Roman Invective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flower, R., and Ludlow, M.. 2020. Rhetoric and Religious Identity in Late Antiquity. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. 1987. ‘Introduzione’, in Fontaine, , Prato, , and Marcone, (eds.), pp. ix–lxxvii.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J., Prato, C., and Marcone, A.. 1987. Giuliano Imperatore. Alla madre degli dèi e altri discorsi. Milan: Arnaldo Mondadori Editore.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fowden, G. 1978. ‘Bishops and Temples in the Eastern Roman Empire A.D. 320–435’, Journal of Theological Studies 29: 53–78.Google Scholar
Fowden, G. 1979. ‘Pagan Philosophers in Late Antique Society with Special Reference to Iamblichus and His Followers’. Diss. Oxford University.Google Scholar
Fowden, G. 1982. ‘The Pagan Holy Man in Late Antique Society’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 102: 33–59.Google Scholar
Fowden, G. 1985. Review of Bregman (1985) in Classical Philology 80: 281–85.Google Scholar
Fowden, G. 1991. ‘Constantine’s Porphyry Column: The Earliest Literary Allusion’, Journal of Roman Studies 81: 119–31.Google Scholar
Fowden, G. 1998. ‘Polytheist Religion and Philosophy’, Cambridge Ancient History XIII: 538–60.Google Scholar
Fowden, G. 2005. ‘Late Polytheism: The World-View’, Cambridge Ancient History XII: 521–37.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (ed.) 2014. Plato in the Third Sophistic. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fowler, R., and Quiroga Puertas, A.. 2014. ‘A Prolegomena to the Third Sophistic’, in Fowler, (ed.), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Franchi de’ Cavalieri, P. 1953. ‘I SS. Gioventino e Massimino’, in Note agiografiche 9: 167–200.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 2000. ‘The Philosopher’, in Brunschwig, J. and Lloyd, G. E. R. (eds.), Greek Thought: A Guide to Classical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freisenbruch, A. 2007. ‘Back to Fronto: Doctor and Patient in his Correspondence with an Emperor’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.), Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–56.Google Scholar
French, D. R. 1998. ‘Rhetoric and the Rebellion of A.D. 387 in Antioch’, Historia 47: 468–84.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2014. ‘“Recusatio” as Political Theatre: Horace’s Letter to Augustus’, Journal of Roman Studies 104: 105–32.Google Scholar
Gaisford, T. 1842. Eusebii Pamphili episcopi Caesariensis, Eclogae Propheticae, e codice manuscripto bibliothecae Caesareae Vindobonensis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galvão-Sobrinho, C. R. 2013. Doctrine and Power: Theological Controversy and Christian Leadership in the later Roman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gangloff, A. 2018. Pouvoir impérial et vertus philosophiques: l’évolution de la figure du bon prince sous le Haut-Empire. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
García-Ruiz, M. P. 2015. ‘Una Lectura Conjuncta del Primer Encomio A Constancio y el Encomio A Eusebia de Juliano’, Exemplaria Classica 19: 155–73.Google Scholar
García-Ruiz, M. P. 2018. ‘Julian’s Self-Representation in Coins and Texts’, in Burgersdijk, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 204–33.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. 1984. ‘Religious Toleration in Classical Antiquity’, Studies in Church History 21: 1–27.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. 2000. ‘Introduction: The Hellenistic and Roman Periods’, in Rowe, and Schofield, (eds.), pp. 397–414.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. 2003. ‘Introduction’, in Bowen, and Garnsey, , pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P., and Humfress, C.. 2001. The Evolution of the Late Antique World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P., and Winton, R.. 1981. ‘Political Theory’, in Finley, M. I. (ed.), The Legacy of Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. 1972. ‘Il ‘Dione’ di Sinesio nel quadro del dibattito culturale del IV secolo d.C.’, Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica 100: 32–45.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. 1989. Opere di Sinesio di Cirene. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar
Garzya, A., and Roques, D.. 2000a. Synésios de Cyrène, tome I: Correspondance (lettres I–LXIII). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Garzya, A., and Roques, D.. 2000b. Synésios de Cyrène, tome II : Correspondance (lettres LXIV–CLVI). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Gassman, M. 2016. ‘Eschatology and Politics in Cyril of Jerusalm’s Epistle to Constantius’, Vigiliae Christianae 70: 119–33.Google Scholar
Gassman, M. 2020. Worshippers of the Gods: Debating Paganism in the Fourth Century Roman West. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, J. 1958. L’Église dans l’Empire Romain: IVe–Ve siècles. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Geffcken, J. 1914. Kaiser Iulianus. Leipzig: Dieterich.Google Scholar
Germino, E. 2004. Scuola e cultura nella legislazione di Giuliano l‘Apostata. Naples: Eugenio Jovene.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. H. 1903. Eusebii Pamphili Evangelicae praeparationis libri XV. Ad codices manuscriptos denuo collatos recensuit, anglice nunc primum reddidit, notis et indicibus instruxit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. 2007. Die Konstantinische Wende: Voraussetzungen und Geistige Grundlagen der Religionspolitik Konstantins des Grossen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. M. 2013. Konstantin. Rede an die Versammlung der Heiligen. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1995. Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2001a. Being Greek under Rome. Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of the Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2001b. ‘The Erotic Eye: Visual Stimulation and Cultural Conflict’, in Goldhill (2001a), pp. 154–94.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2002. Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2006. ‘Rethinking Religious Revolution’, in Goldhill, and Osborne, (eds.), pp. 141–63.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2009. ‘Constructing Identity in the Love Letters of Philostratus’, in Bowie, E. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Philostratus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–308.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2020. Preposterous Poetics: The Politics and Aesthetics of Form in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2021. ‘The Union and Divorce of Classical Philology and Theology’, in Conybeare, and Goldhill, (eds.), pp. 33–62.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2022. The Christian Invention of Time: Temporality and the Literature of Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S., and Greensmith, E.. 2020. ‘Gregory of Nazianzus in the Palatine Anthology: The Poetics of Christian Death’, The Cambridge Classical Journal 66: 29–69.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S., and Osborne, R. (eds.) 2006. Rethinking Revolutions through Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. 2008. ‘Réflexions sur la loi scolaire de l’empereur Julien’, in Hugonnard-Roche, J. (ed.), L’enseignement supérieur dans les mondes antiques et médiévaux. Paris: Vrin, pp. 175–200.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. 2008. Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius, and the Library of Caesarea. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Green, R. P. H. 2010. ‘Constantine as Patron of Christian Latin Poetry’, Studia Patristica 46: 65–76.Google Scholar
Greenlee, C. 2020. ‘The Ideology of Imperial Unity in Themistius (Or. 1) and Libanius (Or. 59)’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 133–56.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. N. 2013. ‘A Cautionary Note on Julian’s Pagan Trinity’, Ancient Philosophy 33: 391–402.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. N. 2014. ‘Crafting Divine Personae in Julian’s Or. 7’, Classical Philology 109: 140–49.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. N. 2017a. ‘Constantinian Influence upon Julian’s Pagan Church’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 68: 1–21.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. N. 2017b. ‘Julian’s Use of Asclepius against the Christians’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 109: 491–509.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. N. 2019. ‘Homer and the Wrath of Julian’, Classical Quarterly 69: 887–95.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. N. 2021. Julian and Christianity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, R. C. 1980. The Life of Antony; and the Letter to Marcellinus. Athanasius. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2013. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: ‘Future Past’ from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grillet, B., and Guinot, J. -N.. 1990. Homélie sur Babylas. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, W. M. A. 1980. ‘Semeion, Tekmerion, Eikos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology 101: 383–98.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1984. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Guidetti, F. 2013. ‘Iconografia di Costantino. L’invenzione di una nuova immagine imperiale’, in Melloni, A. (ed.) Costantino I. Enciclopedia costantiniana sulla figura e l’immagine dell’imperatore del cosiddetto editto di Milano, 313–2013, Rome: Treccani, II 185–200, 961–79Google Scholar
Guidetti, F. 2015. ‘I ritratti dell’imperatore Giuliano’, in Marcone, (ed.), pp. 12–49.Google Scholar
Haas, C. 1997. Alexandria in Late Antiquity: Topography and Social Conflict. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 2017. ‘Optatian and His Oeuvre: Explorations in Ontology’, in Squire, and Wienand, (eds.), pp. 391–425.Google Scholar
Hadijttofi, F., and Lefteratou, A. (eds.) 2020. The Genres of Late Antique Christian Poetry: Between Modulations and Transpositions. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1977. Ambroise de Milan, Apologie de David. Introd., texte latin, notes et index. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1981. Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris: Etudes augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Hafner, M. 2017. Lukians Schrift ‘Das traurige Los der Gelehrten’: Einführung und Kommentar zu De Mercede Conductis Potentium Familiaribus. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hägg, T., and Rousseau, P. (eds.) 2000. Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hagl, W. 1997. Arcadius Apis Imperator: Synesius von Kyrene und sein Beitrag zum Herrscherideal der Spätantike. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hahn, J. 1989. Der Philosoph und die Gesellschaft: Selbstverständnis, öffentliches Auftreten und populäre Erwartungen in der hohen Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Haines, C. R. 1962. The Correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto. Cambridge, MA; London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hall, S. G. 1998. ‘Some Constantinian Documents in the Vita Constantini’, in Lieu, S. N. C. and Monstserrat, D. (eds.), Constantine: History, Historiography and Legend. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 86–103.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2008. Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannestad, N. 2007. ‘Die Porträtskulptur zur Zeit Konstantins des Grossen’, in Demandt, A. and Engemann, J. (eds.), Konstantin der Grosse. Trier: Rheinisches Landesmuseum, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar
Harkins, P. W. 1963. St John Chrysostom: Baptismal Instructions. Translated and annotated. New York: Newman Press.Google Scholar
Harl, M. 1982. ‘Origène et les interpretations patristiques greques de l’obscurité biblique’, Vigiliae Christianae 36: 334–71.Google Scholar
Harries, J. 2012. ‘Julian the Lawgiver’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 121–36.Google Scholar
Hartmann, U. 2008. ‘Claudius Gothicus und Aurelianus’, in Johne, K.-P. (ed.), Die Zeit der Soldatenkaiser. Krise und Transformation des Römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. (235–284). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hartney, A. M. 2004. John Chrysostom and the Transformation of the City. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Heather, P. J. 1998. ‘Themistius: A Political Philosopher’, in Whitby, (ed.), pp. 125–50.Google Scholar
Heather, P. J. 2020. ‘The Gallic Wars of Julian Caesar’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 64–96.Google Scholar
Heather, P. J., and Matthews, J.. 1991. The Goths in the Fourth Century. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Heather, P. J., and Moncur, D.. 2001. Politics, Philosophy, and Empire in the Fourth Century: Select Orations of Themistius. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Heck, E. 2009. ‘Constantin und Lactanz in Trier – Chronologisches’, Historia 58: 118–30.Google Scholar
Heim, F. 1992. La Théologie de la victoire de Constantine à Theodose. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Helm, R. 1956. Die Chronik des Hieronymus. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Henck, N. 2001. ‘Constantius’ paideia, Intellectual Milieu and Promotion of the Liberal Arts’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 47: 172–82.Google Scholar
Henck, N. 2002. ‘Constantius ὀ Φιλοκτίστης?’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 55: 279–304.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2002. Pliny’s Statue: The Letters, Self-Portraiture and Classical Art. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1995. ‘Graecia Capta: Roman Views of Greek Culture’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 243–61.Google Scholar
Hidber, T. 2006. Herodians Darstellung der Kaisergeschichte nach Marc Aurel. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, L. M. 2012. ‘Die Lebenswelt des Synesius von Kyrene – ein historischer Überblick’, in Seng, and Hoffmann, (eds.), pp. 35–65.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. (2009) ‘What Was Commentary in Late Antiquity? The Example of the Neoplatonic Commentators’, in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrine, P. (eds.), Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 597–622.Google Scholar
Hollerich, M. J. 1989. ‘The Comparison of Moses and Constantine in Eusebius of Caesarea’s Life of Constantine’, Studia Patristica 19: 80–95.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1998. ‘Christian Number and Its Implications’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 6: 185–226.Google Scholar
Horst, C. 2013. Marc Aurel: Philosophie und politische Macht zur Zeit der Zweiten Sophistik. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Humfress, C. 2007. Orthodoxy and the Courts in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Humphries, M. 1997. ‘In Nomine Patris: Constantine the Great and Constantius II in Christological Polemic’, Historia 46: 448–64.Google Scholar
Humphries, M. 1998. ‘Savage Humour: Christian Anti-panegyric in Hilary of Poitiers’ Against Constantius’, in Whitby, (ed.), pp. 201–23.Google Scholar
Humphries, M. 2012. ‘The Tyrant’s Mask? Images of Good and Bad Rule in Julian’s Letter to the Athenians’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. 1995. ‘Julian and Marcus Aurelius’, in Innes, D., Hine, H., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for D. Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 287–98.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. 1997. ‘The Church as a Public Institution’, Cambridge Ancient History XIII: 238–76.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. 2012. ‘The Christian Context of Julian’s against the Galileans’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 251–61.Google Scholar
Hunter, D. G. 1988. A Comparison between a King and a Monk; Against the Opponents of the Monastic Life: Two Treatises by John Chrysostom. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, D. G. 1989. ‘Libanius and John Chrysostom: New Thoughts on an Old Problem’, Studia Patristica 22: 129–35.Google Scholar
Huttner, U. 2004. Recusatio imperii: ein politisches Ritual zwischen Ethik und Taktik. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. 1998. Cicero’s Correspondence: A Literary Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inowlocki, S. 2004. ‘Eusebius of Caesarea’s ‘interpretatio Christiana’ of Philo’s De vita contemplativa’, Harvard Theological Review 97: 305–28.Google Scholar
Inowlocki, S. 2006. Eusebius and the Jewish Authors: His Citation Technique in an Apologetic Context. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Inowlocki, S. 2007. ‘Eusebius’ Appropriation of Moses in an Apologetic Context’, in Graupner, A. and Wolter, M. (eds.), Moses in Biblical and Extra-Biblical Traditions. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, pp. 241–55.Google Scholar
Ip, P. H. 2022. ‘Thinking with Origen Today: Hermeneutical Challenges and Future Directions’, Modern Theology 38: 191–203.Google Scholar
Isele, B. 2010. Kampf um Kirchen: religiöse Gewalt, heiliger Raum und christiche Topographie in Alexandria und Konstantinopel (4. Jh.). Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
James, L. 2012. ‘Is There an Empress in the Text? Julian’s Speech of Thanks to Eusebia’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. 2006. Ethnicity and Argument in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: the Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. 2014. Eusebius. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. 2020. ‘The Rhetoric of Pagan Religious Identities: Porphyry and his First Readers’, in Flower, R. and Ludlow, M. (eds.), Rhetoric and Religious Identity in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 28–47.Google Scholar
Johnson, A., and Schott, J. (eds.) 2013. Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations, Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. 1949. Constantine and the Conversion of Europe. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. 1964. The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social, Economical and Administrative Survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M., and Skeat, T.. 1954. ‘Note on the Genuineness of the Constantinian Documents in Eusebius’ Life of Constantine and Appendix’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 5: 196–200.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1978. The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2010. ‘Themistius after the Death of Julian’, Historia 59: 501–6.Google Scholar
Kahlos, M. 2007. Debate and Dialogue: Christian and Pagan Cultures c. 360–430, Aldershot; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kahlos, M. 2009. Forbearance and Compulsion: The Rhetoric of Religious Tolerance and Intolerance in Late Antiquity. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Kahlos, M. 2012. ‘Pagan-Christian Debates over the Interpretation of Texts in Late Antiquity’, Classical World 105: 525–45.Google Scholar
Kahlos, M. 2019. Religious Dissent in Late Antiquity, 350–450. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, W. 2015. ‘Justinian and the Corpus Iuris Civilis’, The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–48.Google Scholar
Karla, G. 2020. ‘Libanius’ Imperial Speech to Constantius II and Constans (Or. 59): Context, Tradition and, Innovation’, in Omissi, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 67–90.Google Scholar
Kaster, B. 1983. ‘The Salaries of Libanius’, Chiron 13: 37–59.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. 2007. ‘Riot Control and Imperial Ideology in the Roman Empire’, Phoenix 61: 150–76.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. 2012. ‘Bureaucracy and Government’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 183–204.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. 2008. Ammianus Marcellinus: The Allusive Historian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. N. D. 1995. Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom, Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1983. Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Key Fowden, E., and Fowden, G.. 2008. Contextualising Late Greek philosophy, Athens; Paris: National Hellenic Research Foundation.Google Scholar
King, C. W. 1888. Julian the Emperor: Containing Gregory Nazianzen’s Two Invectives and Libanius’ Monody with Julian’s Extant Theosophical Works. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Klauser, T. 1944. ‘Aurum Coronarium’, Römische Mitteilungen 59: 129–53.Google Scholar
Klein, R. 1977. Constantius II. und die Christliche Kirche. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Klein, R. (1982) ‘Zur Glaubwürdigkeit historischer Aussagen des Bischofs Athnasius von Alexandria über die Religionspolitik des Kaisers Constantius II’, Studia Patristica 17: 996–1017.Google Scholar
Koch, W. 1927–28. ‘Comment l’empereur Julian tâcha de fonder une église païenne’, Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Historie 6: 123–46; 7: 42–82, 511–50, 1363–85.Google Scholar
Kofsky, A. 2000. Eusebius of Caesarea against Paganism. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Kolb, F. 2004. ‘Praesens Deus: Kaiser und Gott unter der Tetrarchie’, in Demandt, A., Goltz, A., and Schlange-Schöningen, H. (eds.), Diokletian und die Tetrarchie: Aspekte einer Zeitwende. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar
König, J. 2012. Saints and Symposiasts: The Literature of Food and the Symposium in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
König, J., and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.) 2007. Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Körfer, A. L. 2019. Kaiser Konstantin als Leser: Panegyrik, performance und Poetologie in den carmina Optatians. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1918. ‘Das Akrostichon Ἰησοῦς Χρειστὸς Θεοῦ Ὑιὸς Σωτὴρ Σταυρός’, Sokrates 6: 99–105.Google Scholar
Kurmann, A. 1988. Gregor von Nazianz, Oratio 4 gegen Julian: ein Kommentar. Basel: Reinhardt.Google Scholar
Labriola, I. 1972. Messaggio agli Ateniesi. Saggio e traduzione. Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar
Lacombrade, C. 1951a. Synésios de Cyrène Hellène et chrétien. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lacombrade, C. 1951b. Le Discours sur la Royauté de Synésios de Cyrène à l’empereur Arcadios. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lacombrade, C. 1964. L’Empereur Julien, oeuvres complètes, t. II, 2e p.: Discours de Julien Empereur. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lacombrade, C. 1978. Synésios de Cyrene, tome I: Hymnes. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lacoste, J.-Y. 2014. ‘Theōria, vita philosophica, and Christian Experience’, in From Theology to Theological Thinking, translated by W. C. Hackett. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. 1986. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, J., and Aujoulat, N.. 2004. Synésios de Cyrène, tome IV: Opuscules I. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, J., and Aujoulat, N.. 2008a. Synésios de Cyrène, tome V: Opuscules II. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, J., and Aujoulat, N.. 2008b. Synésios de Cyrène, tome VI: Opuscules III. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. 1986. Pagans and Christians. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. 2015. Augustine: Conversions and Confessions. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lauwers, J. 2013. ‘Systems of Sophistry and Philosophy: The Case of the Second Sophistic’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 107: 331–63.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. 2018. ‘Pliny Epistles 10 and Imperial Correspondence: The Empire of Letters’, in König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan, and Hadrian. Literary Interactions, D 96–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 280–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. D. 1993. Information and Frontiers: Roman Foreign Relations in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, A. D. 2012. ‘Traditional Religions’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 159–80.Google Scholar
Lenski, N. (ed.) 2012a. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lenski, N. 2012b. ‘The Reign of Constantine’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 59–90.Google Scholar
Lenski, N. 2014. Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman state in the fourth century A.D. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lenski, N. 2016. Constantine and the Cities: Imperial Authority and Civic Politics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lettieri, G. 2013. ‘Lattanzio ideologo della svolta costantiniana’, in Enciclopedia Costantiniana. Milan: I 45–57.Google Scholar
Levick, B. 2010. Augustus: Image and Substance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lianeri, A. 2016. Knowing Future Time in and through Greek Historiography. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 1990. Barbarians and Bishops: Army, Church, and State in the Age of Arcadius and Chrysostom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2005. Ambrose of Milan: Political Letters and Speeches. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2007. ‘Was There a Crisis of the third Century?’, in Hekster, O., de Kleijn, G. and Slootijes, D. (eds.), Crises and the Roman Empire: Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire. Leiden: Brill, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2011. Ambrose and John Chrysostom: Clerics between Desert and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2012. ‘Julian’s Hymn to the Mother of the Gods’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 213–27.Google Scholar
Lieu, S. C. 1986. The Emperor Julian: Panegyric and Polemic. Claudius Mamertinus, John Chrysostom, Ephrem the Syrian. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Lieu, S. C. 2004. Christian Identity in the Jewish and Graeco-Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lisi, F. L. 2001. Plato’s Laws and Its Historical Significance: Selected Papers of the International Congress on Ancient Thought. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Lizzi Testa, R. 1987. Il potere episcopale nell’Oriente romano. Rappresentazione ideologica e realtà politica (IV–V sec. d.C.). Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Lizzi Testa, R. 1999. ‘Synesius’, in Bowersock, G. W., Brown, P., and Grabar, O. (eds.), Late Antiquity, a Guide to the Postclassical World. Cambridge, MA; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 710.Google Scholar
Lizzi Testa, R. 2007. ‘The Late Antique Bishop: Image and Reality’, in Rousseau, Ph. (ed.), A Companion to Late Antiquity. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell, pp. 525–38.Google Scholar
Long, J. 1996. Claudian’s in Eutropium: Or, How, When, and Why to Slander a Eunuch. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Long, J. 2012. ‘Afterword: Studying Julian the Author’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 323–38.Google Scholar
López-Sánchez, F. 2012. ‘Julian and His Coinage, a Very Constantinian Prince’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 159–81.Google Scholar
Lössl, J. 2012. ‘Julian’s Consolation to Himself on the Departure of the Excellent Salutius: Rhetoric and Philosophy in the Fourth Century’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 61–74.Google Scholar
Louth, A. 2003. ‘The Collectio Sabbaitica and Sixth Century Origenism’, in Perrone, L. (ed.) Origeniana Octava. Origen and the Alexandrian Tradition. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 1167–76.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucrezi, F. 1995. Aspetti giuridici del principato di Vespasiano. Naples: Eugenio Jovene.Google Scholar
Lunn-Rockliffe, S. 2017. ‘The Power of the Jewelled Style: Christian Signs and Names in Optatian’s versus intexti and on Gems’, in Squire, and Wienand, (eds.), pp. 427–60.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. E. 2020. Musonius Rufus. That One Should Disdain Hardships: The Teachings of a Roman Stoic. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. 1981. Art and Ceremony in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1969. Constantine. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1976. Roman Government’s Response to Crisis, A.D. 235–337. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maisano, R. 1994. ‘La funzione dei richiami platonici nei discorsi di Temistio’, in Curti, C. and Crimi, C. (eds.), Scritti classici e cristiani offerti a Francesco Corsaro. Catania: Università degli studi di Catania, pp. 415–29.Google Scholar
Maisano, R. 1995. Temistio. Discorsi. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar
Maisano, R. 2006. ‘Patrimonio culturale “di prima mano” e “di seconda mano” nei discorsi di Temistio’, in Amato, E. (ed.), Approches de la Troisième Sophistique. Hommages à Jacques Schamp. Brussels: Éditions Latomus.Google Scholar
Malingrey, A.-M. 1961. Philosophia. étude d’un group des mots dans la littérature grecque, des présocratiques au IVe siècle après J.-C. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Malingrey, A.-M. 1972. Jean Chrysostome. Sur la Vaine Gloire et l’Éducation des Enfants. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Malingrey, A.-M. 1980. Jean Chrysostome. Sur le Sacerdoce (dialogue et homélie); introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Malosse, P.-L. 2008. ‘Jean Chrysostome a-t-il été l’éleve de Libanios ?’, Phoenix 62: 273–80.Google Scholar
Maltagliati, G. 2020. ‘Persuasion through Proximity (and Distance) in the Attic Orators’ Historical Examples’, Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies 60: 68–97.Google Scholar
Mantovani, D. 2009. ‘Lex ‘regia’ de imperio Vespasiani. Il vagum imperium e la legge costante’, in Capogrossi Colognesi, L. and Tassi Scandone, E. (eds.), La Lex de Imperio Vespasiani e la Roma dei Flavi. Atti del Convegno, 20–22 novembre 2008. Rome: l’Erma di Bretschneider, pp. 125–55.Google Scholar
Maraval, P. 2013. Les fils de Constantin: Constantin II (337–340), Constance II (337–361), Constant (337–350). Paris: CRNS Editions.Google Scholar
Marcone, A. 1984. ‘Un panegirico rovesciato. Pluralità di modelli e contaminazione letteraria nel Misopogon giulianeo’, Revue d’Études Augustiniennes 30: 226–39.Google Scholar
Marcone, A. 2012. ‘The Forging of a Hellenic Orthodoxy: Julian’s Speeches against the Cynics’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 239–50.Google Scholar
Marcone, A. 2015. L’imperatore Giuliano. Realtà storica e rappresentazione. Milan; Florence: Le Monnier Università.Google Scholar
Marcone, A. 2019. Giuliano. Rome: Salerno editrice.Google Scholar
Marcos, M. 2009. ‘“He Forced with Gentleness”. Emperor Julian’s Attitude to Religious Coercion’, Antiquité Tardive 19: 191–204.Google Scholar
Markus, R. A. 1990. The End of Ancient Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marlowe, E. (2016) ‘The Multivalence of Memory: The Tetrarchs, the Senate, and the Vicennalia Monument in the Roman Forum’, in Galinsky, K. and Lapatin, K. (eds.), Cultural Memories in the Roman Empire. Los Angeles: Getty: 240–62.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. 2008. The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martens, J. 1994. ‘Nomos Empsychos in Philo and Clement of Alexandria’, in Helleman, W. E. (ed.), Hellenization revisited. Lanham; London: University Press of America, pp. 323–38.Google Scholar
Masaracchia, E. 1990. Contra Galilaeos. Giuliano Imperatore; introduzione, testo critico e traduzione. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Mathew, G. 1943. ‘The Character of the Gallienic Renaissance’, Journal of Roman Studies 33: 65–70.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. 1989. The Roman Empire of Ammianus. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. L. 2006. Christianisation and Communication in Late Antiquity: John Chrysostom and His Congregation in Antioch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazza, M. 1986. ‘Filosofia religiosa ed Imperium in Giuliano’, in Mazza, M. (ed.), Le maschere del potere. Cultura e politica nella tarda antichità. Naples: Eugenio Jovene, pp. 95–148.Google Scholar
McCormick, M. 1986. Eternal Victory: Triumphal Rulership in Late Antiquity, Byzantium, and the Early Medieval West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLynn, N. B. 1994. Ambrose of Milan: Church and Court in a Christian Capital. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McLynn, N. B. 2005. ‘“Genere hispanus”: Theodosius, Spain, and Nicene Orthodoxy’, in Bowes, K. D. and Kulikowski, M. (eds.), Hispania in Late Antiquity: Current Perspectives. Boston; Leiden: Brill 77–120.Google Scholar
McLynn, N. B. 2006. ‘Among the Hellenists: Gregory and the Sophists’, in McLynn, N. (ed.), Christian Politics and Religious Culture in Late Antiquity. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum, pp. 213–38.Google Scholar
McLynn, N. B. 2014. ‘Julian and the Christian Professors’, in Harrison, G., Humfress, C., and Sandwell, I. (eds.) Being Christian in Late Antiquity: A Festschrift for Gillian Clark. Oxford University Press, pp. 120–38.Google Scholar
Metzger, E. 1998. A Companion to Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. T. 1985. Palladius. Dialogue on the Life of John Chrysostom. New York: Newman Press.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. 1990. ‘The Kingship Orations of Dio Chrysostom’, Papers of the Leeds Latin Seminar 6: 297–365.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1963. ‘Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century A.D.’, in The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century: Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1971. The Development of Greek Biography: Four Lectures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1973. ‘Freedom of Speech in Antiquity’, in Wiener, P. P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. New York: Scribners, II pp. 252–63.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1987. ‘Ancient Biography and the Study of Religion in the Roman Empire’, in On Pagans, Jews, and Christians, Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, pp. 159–77.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 2015. Roman Faith and Christian Faith: pistis and fides in the Early Roman Empire and Early Churches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, M. 2018. Emperors and Senators in the Reign of Constantius II: Maintaining Imperial Rule between Rome and Constantinople in the Fourth Century AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moss, J. 2007. ‘The Doctor and the Pastry Chef: Pleasure and Persuasion in Plato’s Gorgias’, Ancient Philosophy 27: 229–49.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 2010. ‘Hellenistic Allegory and Early Imperial Rhetoric’, in Copeland, and Struck, (eds.), pp. 26–38.Google Scholar
Müller, F. L. 1998. Die beiden Satiren des Kaisers Julianus Apostata. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Naber, S. A. (1867) M. Cornelii Frontonis et M. Aurelii Imperatoris Epistulae: L. veri et T. Antonini Pii et Appiani Epistularum Reliquiae. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Nasrallah, L. S. 2010. Christian Responses to Roman Art and Architecture: The Second-Century Church amid the Spaces of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 2008. ‘Mit “Waffen” Platonis gegen ein christliches Imperium: der Mythos in Julians Schrift Gegen den Kyniker Herakleios’, in Schäfer, (ed.), pp. 207–19.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 2020. ‘Julian’s Philosophical Writings’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 38–63.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, T. 2013. Kaiser Julian und die Repaganisierung des Reiches. Konzept und Vorbilder. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Niccolai, L. 2017a. ‘Julian, Plutarch, and the Dangers of Self-Praise’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 57: 1058–84.Google Scholar
Niccolai, L. 2017b. ‘“Avrei potuto punirti, ma ho preferito scriverti”: regole della politica e regole della satira tra Contro Nilo e Misopogon’, Athenaeum 105: 601–20.Google Scholar
Niccolai, L. 2019. ‘The “House of Hesychius” and the Religious Allegiance of Synesius’ Family’, Historia 68: 368–85.Google Scholar
Niccolai, L. 2021. ‘Synesius of Cyrene, Sophist-Bishop: Rhetoric and Religion in the Greek East at the Turn of the Fifth Century CE’, Rhetorica 39: 209–33.Google Scholar
Niccolai, L. 2023. ‘Julian the Emperor and the Reaction against Christianity: A Case Study of Resistance from the Top’, in Elsner, J. and Jolowicz, D. (eds.), Articulating Resistance under the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–238.Google Scholar
Nicolosi, S. 1959. Il De providentia di Sinesio: studio critico e tradizione. Padua: CEDAM.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. 2011. Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, C. E. W. 1983. ‘Latin Panegyrics of the Tetrarchic and Constantinian Periods’, in Croke, B. and Emmett, E. M. (eds.), History and Historians in Late Antiquity. Sydney; Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 88–99.Google Scholar
Nixon, C. E. V., Rodgers, B. S., and Mynors, R. A. B.. 1994. In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini. Introduction, Translation and Historical Commentary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nock, A.B. 1926. Sallustius: Concerning the Gods and Universe. Edited with prolegomena and translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nongbri, B. 2008. ‘Dislodging “Embedded” Religion: A Brief Note on a Scholarly Trope’, Numen 55: 440–60.Google Scholar
Nongbri, B. 2013. Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. 2001. ‘The Communication of the Emperor’s Virtues’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 146–58.Google Scholar
Norman, A. F. 1969. Libanius. Selected Orations, vol. 1. London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, A. F. 1977. Libanius. Selected orations, vol. 2. London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. F. 1992. Autobiography and Selected Letters. London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Odahl, C. M. 2010. Constantine and the Christian Empire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 2005. Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 2014. ‘Political Theory’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 471–81.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 2017. ‘Plato’s Political Dialogues in the Writings of Julian the Emperor’, in Tarrant, H. et al. (eds.), The Brill Companion for the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 400–11.Google Scholar
Omissi, A. 2018. Emperors and Usurpers in the Later Roman Empire: Civil War, Panegyric, and the Construction of Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Omissi, A. 2020. ‘Civil War and the Late Roman Panegyrical Corpus’, in Omissi, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 211–31.Google Scholar
Omissi, A., and Ross, A. J. (eds.) 2020. Imperial Panegyric from Diocletian to Honorius. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Op de Coul, M. 2012. ‘Aspects of Paideia in Synesius’ Dion’, in Seng, and Hoffman, (eds.), pp. 110–24.Google Scholar
Pack, R. 1953. ‘Julian, Libanius, and Others. A Reply’, Classical Philology 48: 173–74.Google Scholar
Pagliara, A. 2012. Retorica, filosofia e politica in Giuliano Cesare. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Pagliara, A. 2015. ‘Giuliano Cesare panegirista di Costanzo II’, in Marcone, (ed.), pp. 87–118.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 2012. ‘Aristotle’s Politics’, in Shield, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 558–85.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. 2014. The Space That Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Penella, R. J. 1990. Greek Philosophers and Sophists in the Fourth Century A.D. Studies in Eunapius of Sardis. Leeds: Frances Cairns.Google Scholar
Penella, R. J. 2000. The Private Orations of Themistius, Translated, Annotated, and Introduced. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Penella, R. J. 2007. Man and the Word. The Orations of Himerius, Translated, Annotated, and Introduced. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pépin, J. 1976. Mythe et allégorie: les origines grecques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Perl, G. 1996. ‘Die Rede des Kaisers Claudius für die Aufnahme römischer Bürger aus Gallia Comata’, Philologus 140: 114–38.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 1993. La rhétorique de l’éloge dans le monde gréco-romain. Paris: Institut d’études augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 2000. La rhétorique dans l’antiquité. Paris: Libraire générale française.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 2015. ‘Greek Figured Speech on Imperial Rome’, Advances in the History of Rhetoric 18: 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernot, L. 2021. ‘The Concept of a Third Sophistic: Definitional and Methodological Issues’, Rhetorica 39: 177–87.Google Scholar
Petit, P. 1950. ‘Libanius et la Vita Constantini’, Historia 1: 562–82.Google Scholar
Petkas, A. 2018. ‘The King in Words: Performance and Fiction in Synesius’ de regno’, American Journal of Philology 139: 123–51.Google Scholar
Pharr, C. 1952. The Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions: A Translation with a Commentary, Glossary, and Bibliography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Piepenbrink, K. 2012. ‘Selbsdarstellung des Synesius als Bischof’, in Seng, and Hoffman, (eds.), pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
Pietri, C. 1989. ‘La politique de Constance II. Un premier ‘césaropapisme’ ou l’Imitatio Constantini?’, in Dihle, A. (ed.), L ’église et l’empire au Ive siècle. Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt, pp. 113–72.Google Scholar
Piganiol, A. 1932. L’empereur Constantin. Paris: Rieder.Google Scholar
Pizzone, A. M. V. 2012. ‘Christliche und heidnische Träume: versteckte Polemik in Synesios, De insomniis’, in Seng, and Hoffman, (eds.), pp. 232–47.Google Scholar
Poggi, V. 2003. ‘Costantino e la chiesa di Persia’, in Bonamente, G. and Carile, A. (eds.), Costantino il Grande nell’età bizantina. Spoleto: Fondazione centro di studi sull’alto Medioevo, pp. 61–97.Google Scholar
Pohlsander, H. 1980. ‘Philip the Arab and Christianity’, Historia 29: 466–67.Google Scholar
Polara, G. 1973. Publii Optatiani Porfyrii Carmina. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar
Polara, G. 1974. ‘Cinquant’anni di studi su Optaziano’, Vichiana 3: 110–24, 282–301.Google Scholar
Ponzone, V. 2018. ‘Giovanni Crisostomo: retorica e politica cristiane’. Diss. University of Pisa.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. 1994. Prophets and Emperors: Human and Divine Authority from Augustus to Theodosius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. 2013. Constantine the Emperor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pownall, F. (2020) ‘Sophists and Flatterers: Greek intellectuals at Alexander’s Court’, in D’Agostni, M., Anson, E. M., and Pownall, F. (eds.), Affective Relations and Personal Bonds in Hellenistic Antiquity: Studies in Honor of Elizabeth D. Carney. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 243–65.Google Scholar
Praechter, K. 1933. Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus. Berlin: Wiedemann.Google Scholar
Prato, C., and Fornaro, A.. 1984. Giuliano Imperatore. Epistola a Temistio. Lecce: Milella.Google Scholar
Puech, B. 2002. Orateurs et sophistes grecs dans les inscriptions d’époque impériale. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Quiroga Puertas, A. 2007. ‘From Sophistopolis to Episcopolis. The Case for a Third Sophistic’, Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture 1: 31–42.Google Scholar
Quiroga Puertas, A. 2008. ‘Deflecting Attention and Shaping Reality with Rhetoric (the Case of the Riot of the Statues of A.D. 387 in Antioch’, Nova Tellus 26: 135–53.Google Scholar
Quiroga Puertas, A. 2009. ‘Julian’s Misopogon and the Subversion of Rhetoric’, Antiquité Tardive 17: 127–35.Google Scholar
Quiroga Puertas, A. 2013a. The Purpose of Rhetoric in Late Antiquity: From Performance to Exegesis. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Quiroga Puertas, A. 2013b. ‘Themistius or. 28. Between Singing and Philosophy’, Athenaeum 101: 605–19.Google Scholar
Quiroga Puertas, A. (ed.) 2017a. Rhetorical Strategies in Late Antique Literature: Images, Metatexts and Interpretation. Leiden; Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroga Puertas, A. 2017b. ‘In Heaven Unlike on Earth: Rhetorical Strategies in Julian’s Caesars’, in Quiroga Puertas, (ed.), pp. 90–103.Google Scholar
Quiroga Puertas, A. 2018. The Dynamics of Rhetorical Performances in Late Antiquity. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 2004. ‘Aristocracy and Freedom of Speech in the Greco-Roman World’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 41–61.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2006. Il basileus come nomos empsychos tra diritto naturale e diritto divino: spunti platonici del concetto e sviluppi di età imperiale e tardoantica. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 1998. ‘Comparison, Paradigm, and the Case of Moses in Panegyric and Hagiography’, in Whitby, (ed.), pp. 277–98.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2005. Holy Bishops in Late Antiquity: The Nature of Christian Leadership in an Age of Transition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1989. ‘Roman Rulers and the Philosophical Adviser’, in Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–58.Google Scholar
Rebenich, S., and Wiemer, H.-U.. 2020. A Companion to Julian the Apostate. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Rebillard, E. 2012. Christians and Their Many Identities in Late Antiquity, North Africa, 200–450 CE. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rees, R. 2002. Layers of Loyalty in Latin Panegyric, AD 289–307. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rees, R. 2004. Diocletian and the Tetrarchy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. C. 1993. Ancient Menippean Satire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Remes, P., and Slaveva-Griffin, S.. 2014. ‘Introduction’, in Slaveva-Griffin, S. and Remes, P. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rendina, S. 2021. La prefettura di Antemio e l’oriente romano. Pisa: ETS edizioni.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1983. The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. 2008. ‘Julians Exegese der Rede des Demiurgen an die versammelten Götter in Platons Timaios 41a–d: Anmerkungen zu Contra Galilaeos fr. 10 Mas.’, in Auger, D. and Wolff, É. (eds.), Culture classique et christianisme. Mélanges offerts à Jean Bouffartigue. Paris: Picard, pp. 83–95.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. 2020. ‘Anti-Christian Polemics and Pagan Onto-Theology: Julian’s Against the Gailaeans’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 245–66.Google Scholar
Rike, R. L. 1987. Apex omnium. Religion in the Res Gestae of Ammianus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. 2019. Mosaics of Knowledge: Representing Information in the Roman World. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rigolio, A. 2019. ‘Themistius: On Virtue’, in Wildberg, J., Trompeter, J., and Rigolio, A. (eds.), Michael of Ephesus: On Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics 10. Themistius: On Virtue. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 207–73.Google Scholar
Robert, F. 2008. ‘La rhétorique au service de la critique du christianisme dans le Contre les Galiléens de l’empereur Julien’, Revue d ’études augustiniennes et patristiques 54: 221–56.Google Scholar
Roberto, U. 2015. ‘Giuliano e la memoria politica della tetrarchia’, in Marcone, (ed.), pp. 50–62.Google Scholar
Rochefort, G. 1956. ‘Le περὶ θεῶν καὶ κόσμου de Saloustios et l’influence de l’Empereur Julien’, Revue des études grecques 69: 50–66.Google Scholar
Rochefort, G. 1963. L’Empereur Julien. Oeuvres complètes, tome II, 1e part: Discours de Julien Empereur. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, D. 2005. ‘Why Didn’t Constantius II Eat Fruit?’, Classical Quarterly 55: 323–26.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J. C. 1935–40. Ammianus Marcellinus: With an English translation, London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roques, D. 1987. Synésios de Cyrène et la Cyrénaïque du Bas-Empire. Paris: Editions du CRNS.Google Scholar
Roques, D. 1989. Études sur la Correspondance de Synésios de Cyrène. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Rosen, K. 2006. Julian. Kaiser, Gott und Christenhasser. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J. 2016. Ammianus’ Julian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J. 2018. ‘The Constantinians’ Returns to the West: Julian’s Depiction of Constantius in Oration 1’, in Burgersdijk, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 183–203.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J. 2020. ‘Text and Paratext: Reading the Emperor Julian via Libanius’ Epitaphios’, American Journal of Philology 141: 241–81.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J., and Omissi, A. (eds.) 2020. Imperial Panegyric from Diocletian to Honorius. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Rostagni, A. 1920. Giuliano l’apostata: saggio critico con le operette politiche e satiriche tradotte e commentate. Turin: Bocca.Google Scholar
Rothrauff, C. M. 1965. ‘The Philanthropia of the Emperor Julian’. Diss. University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Roueché, C. 1997. ‘Benefactors in the Late Roman Period: The Eastern Empire’, in Christol, M. and Masson, O. (eds.), Actes du Xe Congrès International d’Épigraphie Grecque et Latine, Nimes 4–9 Octobre 1992. Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne, pp. 353–68.Google Scholar
Roueché, C. 1998. ‘The Functions of the Governor in Late Antiquity: Some Observations’, Antiquité Tardive 6: 31–36.Google Scholar
Rowe, C., and Schofield, M. (eds.) 2000. The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubenson, S. 1995. The Letters of St. Antony: Monasticism and the Making of a Saint. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Rubenson, S. 2000. ‘Philosophy and Simplicity: The Problem of Classical Education in Early Christian Biography’, in Hägg, and Rousseau, (eds.), pp. 110–39.Google Scholar
Rubenson, S. 2012. ‘Monasticism and the Philosophical Heritage’, in Johnson, S. F. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 487–512.Google Scholar
Runia, D. 1993. Philo in Early Christian Literature: A Survey. Assen; Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Russell, D., and Wilson, N. G.. 1981. Menander Rhetor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabbah, G. 1984. ‘De la rhétorique à la communication politique: les panégiriques latins’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 43: 363–88.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. 2008. ‘Pagans and Christians’, in Ashbrook Harvey, S. and Hunter, D. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 186–202.Google Scholar
Sandwell, I. 2004. ‘Christian Self-Definition in the Fourth Century AD: John Chrysostom on Christianity, Imperial Rule and the City’, in Sandwell, I. and Juskinson, J. (eds.), Culture and Society in Later Roman Antioch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–58.Google Scholar
Sandwell, I. 2007. Religious Identity in Late Antiquity: Greeks, Jews, and Christians in Antioch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sardiello, R. 2001. Giuliano Imperatore. Simposio I Cesari. Lecce: Milella.Google Scholar
Scarpat, G. 2001. Parrhesia greca, parrhesia cristiana. Brescia: Paideia.Google Scholar
Schäfer, C. (ed.) 2008. Kaiser Julian ‘Apostata’ und die philosophische Reaktion gegen das Christentum. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schatkin, M. 1970. ‘The Authenticity of St. John Chrysostom’s Contra Julianum et Gentiles (de Sancto Babyla)’, in Kyriakon: Festschrift Johannes Quasten. Münster: Aschendorff, pp. 474–89.Google Scholar
Schatkin, M. 1985. Discourse on blessed Babylas and against the Greeks. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Schlange-Schöningen, H. 1995. Kaisertum und Bildungswesen im spätantiken Konstantinopel. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. 1994. ‘Claudius als Schriftsteller’, in Strocka, V. M. (ed.), Die Regierungszeit des Kaisers Claudius (41–54 n.Chr.). Umbruch oder Episode? Mainz: von Zabern, pp. 119–32.Google Scholar
Schidmt-Hofner, S. 2020. ‘Reform, Routine, and Propaganda: Julian the Lawgiver’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 124–71.Google Scholar
Schmitt, T. 2001. Die Bekehrung des Synesius von Kyrene: Politik und Philosophie. Munich: Saur.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. 1997. Bildung und Macht: zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1999. Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2000. ‘Epilogue’, in Rowe, and Schofield, (eds.), pp. 661–71.Google Scholar
Schott, J. 2003. ‘Founding Platonopolis: The Platonic Politeia in Eusebius, Porphyry, and Iamblichus’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 11: 501–31.Google Scholar
Schott, J. 2008. Christianity, Empire, and the Making of Religion in Late Antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Schramm, M. 2014. ‘Platonic Ethics and Politics in Themistius and Julian’, in Fowler, (ed.), pp. 131–43.Google Scholar
Schrenk, S. 1995. Typos und Antitypos in der Früchristliche Kunst. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Scicolone, S. 1982. ‘Le accezioni dell’appellativo “Galilei” in Giuliano’, Aevum 56: 71–80.Google Scholar
Scott, A. G. 2015. ‘Cassius Dio, Caracalla and the Senate’, Klio 97: 157–75.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1989. ‘Philosophical Allegiance in the Graeco-Roman World’, in Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–96.Google Scholar
Seeck, O. 1894. ‘Studien zu Synesius’, Philologus 52: 442–83.Google Scholar
Seeck, O. 1906. Die Briefe des Libanius. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Seeck, O. 1920. Geschichte des Untergangs der antiken Welt. Band I. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Seiler, E.-M. 1998. Konstantios II. bei Libanios. Eine kritische Untersuchung der überlieferten Herrschenbildes. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Seng, H., and Hoffmann, L. M. (eds.) 2012. Synesius von Kyrene: Politik, Literatur, Philosophie. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Shahîd, I. 1984. Rome and the Arabs: A Prolegomenon to the Study of Byzantium and the Arabs. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 2011. Sacred Violence. African Christians and Sectarian Hatred in the Age of Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. 2007. ‘Porphyry’s Views on Phantasia’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 89: 71–76.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. 2009. ‘Philostratus and the Symbolic Roles of the Sophist and the Philosopher’, in Bowie, E. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Philostratus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–99.Google Scholar
Siecienski, A. E. (ed.) 2017. Constantine: Religious Faith and Imperial Policy. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Silli, P. 1987. Testi costantiniani nelle fonti letterarie. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Simelidis, C. 2009. Selected Poems of Gregory of Nazianzus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Simmons, M. B. 2015. Universal Salvation in Late Antiquity: Porphyry of Tyre and the Pagan-Christian Debate. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siniossoglou, N. 2008. Plato and Theodoret: The Christian Appropriation of Platonic Philosophy and the Hellenic Intellectual Resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sissa, G. 2009. ‘Gendered Politics, or the Self-Praise of Andres Agathoi’, in Balot, R. K. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden, MA; Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. 2017. ‘Anchoring Innovation: A Classical Research Agenda’, European Review 25: 20–38.Google Scholar
Smith, C., and Yarrow, L. M. (eds.) 2012. Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. 1997. ‘The Religion of Constantius I’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 38: 187–208.Google Scholar
Smith, R. B. E. 1995. Julian’s Gods: Religion and Philosophy in the Thought and Action of Julian the Apostate. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1990. ‘Late Roman Philosopher Portraits from Aphrodisias’, Journal of Roman Studies 80: 127–55.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1997. ‘The Public Image of Licinius I: Portrait Sculpture and Imperial Ideology in the Early Fourth Century’, Journal of Roman Studies 87: 170–202.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. 1993. ‘Il De Vita Sua di Claudio e le caratteristiche di Claudio come storico di se stesso e di Roma’, Rendiconti 127: 213–19.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2017a. ‘POP art: the Optical Poetics of Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius’, in Elsner, and Hernández Lobato, (eds.), pp. 25–99.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2017b. ‘Optatian and His Lettered Art: A Kaleidoscopic Lens on Late Antiquity’, in Squire, and Wienand, (eds.), pp. 55–120.Google Scholar
Squire, M., and Whitton, C.. 2017. ‘Machina sacra: Optatian and the Lettered Art of the Christogram’, in Garizpanov, I. (ed.) Graphic Signs of Identity, Faith, and Power in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 45–108.Google Scholar
Squire, M., and Wienand, J. (eds.) 2017. Morphogrammata: The Lettered Art of Optatian Figuring Cultural Transformations in the Age of Constantine. Padeborn: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Stanton, G. R. 1973. ‘Sophists and Philosophers: Problems of Classification’, American Journal of Philology 94: 350–64.Google Scholar
Stenger, J. 2009. Hellenische Identität in der Spätantike: pagane Autoren und ihr Unbehagen an der eigenen Zeit. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stenger, J. 2016. ‘Where to Find Christian Philosophy? Spatiality in John Chrysostom’s Counter to Greek Paideia’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 24: 173–98.Google Scholar
Sterk, A. 1998. ‘On Basil, Moses, and the Model Bishop: The Cappadocian Legacy of Leadership’, Church History 67: 227–53.Google Scholar
Sterk, A. 2004. Renouncing the World Yet Leading the Church: The Monk-Bishop in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stertz, S. A. 1977. ‘Marcus Aurelius as Ideal Emperor in Late Antique Greek Thought’, Classical World 70: 433–39.Google Scholar
Stöcklin-Kaldewey, S. 2014. Julians Gottesverherung im Kontext der Spätantike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Strobel, K. 1993. Das Imperium Romanum im 3. Jahrhundert: Modell einer historischen Krise? Zur Frage mentaler Strukturen breiterer Bevölkerungsschichten in der Zeit von Marc Aurel bis zum Ausgang des 3. Jh. N. Chr. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. 2004. Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. 2010. ‘Allegory and Ascent in Neoplatonism’, in Copeland, and Struck, (eds.), pp. 57–70.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1989. ‘Plutarch: Chance, Providence, and History’, American Journal of Philology 110: 272–302.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1996. Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 2013. Themistius, Julian, and Greek Political Theory under Rome: Texts, Translations and Studies of Four Key Works. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szidat, J. 1981. Historischer Kommentar zu Ammianus Marcellinus Buch XX–XXI. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. 2008. Konversion zur Philosophie in der Spätantike. Kaiser Julian und Synesios von Kyrene. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. 2013. Theurgy in Late Antiquity. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Tantillo, I. 1997. La prima orazione di Giuliano a Costanzo. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Tantillo, I. 2003. ‘Costantino e Helios Paneptotes’: la statua equestre di Termessos’, Epigraphica 65: 159–84.Google Scholar
Taoka, Y. 2013. ‘The Correspondence of Fronto and Marcus Aurelius’, Classical Antiquity 32: 406–38.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 2014. ‘Platonist Curricula and Their Influence’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. 1996. ‘The Regal Image in Plutarch’s Lives’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 116: 135–51.Google Scholar
Teitler, H. C. 2017. The Last Pagan Emperor: Julian the Apostate and the War against Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. 1965. The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period. Åbo: Åbo Academi.Google Scholar
Tiersch, C. 2002. Johannes Chrysostomus in Konstantinopel (398–404): Weltsicht und Wirken eines Bischofs in der Hauptstadt des Oströmischen Reiches. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Tor, S. 2017. Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology: A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tougher, S. 1998a. ‘In Praise of an Empress: Julian’s Speech of Thanks to Eusebia’, in Whitby, (ed.), pp. 105–23.Google Scholar
Tougher, S. 1998b. ‘Advocacy of an Empress. Julian and Eusebia’, Classical Quarterly 48: 595–99.Google Scholar
Tougher, S. 2007. Julian the Apostate. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Tougher, S. 2012. ‘Reading between the Lines: Julian’s First Panegyric on Constantius II’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
Tougher, S. 2020a. ‘Julian and Claudius Mamertinus: Panegyric and Polemic in East and West’, in Omissi, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 117–40.Google Scholar
Tougher, S. 2020b. ‘Julian the Apologist: Christians and Pagans on the Mother of the Gods’, in Flower, and Ludlow, (eds.), pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. 2007. Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics, and Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Treu, K. 1959. Synesios von Kyrene. Dion Chrysostomos oder vom Leben nach seinem Vorbild. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tuori, K. 2016. The Emperor of Law: The Emergence of Roman Imperial Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, D. 2010. ‘Allegory in Christian Late Antiquity’, in Copeland, and Struck, (eds.), pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. 1974. ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185: 1124–31.Google Scholar
Ugenti, V. 1992. Alla madre degli dèi: edizione critica, traduzione e commento. Lecce: Congedo.Google Scholar
Ugenti, V. 2014. Giuliano imperatore. A Salustio. Autoconsolazione per la partenza dell’ottimo Salustio. Pisa; Rome: Fabrizio Serra.Google Scholar
Ullmann, W. 1975. Law and Politics in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urbano, A. P. 2013. The Philosophical Life: Biography and the Crafting of Intellectual Identity in Late Antiquity, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Vagnone, G. 2012. Dione di Prusa: orazioni I–II–III–IV (Sulla regalità), orazione LXII (Sulla regalità e sulla tirannide). Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Van Dam, R. 2007a. ‘Bishops and Society’, in Casiday, A. and Norris, F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 343–66.Google Scholar
Van Dam, R. 2007b. The Roman Revolution of Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, R. 2011. Remembering Constantine at the Milvian Bridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, R. M. 2019. ‘The Emperor Julian, Against the Cynic Heraclius (Oration 7): A Polemic about Myths’, in van Kooten, G. and van Ruiten, J. (eds.), Intolerance, Polemics, and Debate in Antiquity: Politico-Cultural, Philosophical, and Religious Forms of Critical Conversation. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 423–39.Google Scholar
Van de Paverd, F. 1991. St. John Chrysostom, the Homilies on the Statues: An Introduction. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Orientalium Studiorum.Google Scholar
Vanderspoel, J. 1995. Themistius and the Imperial Court. Oratory, Civic Duty, and Paideia from Constantius to Theodosius. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L. 2010a. Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L. 2010b. ‘Greek Rhetoric and the Later Roman Empire: The Bubble of the Third Sophistic’, Antiquité Tardive 18: 211–24.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L. 2013. ‘Performing Paideia. Greek Culture as an Instrument for Social Promotion in the Fourth Century A.D.’, Classical Quarterly 63: 387–406.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L., and Van Nuffelen, P.. 2011. ‘Monarchy and Mass Communication: Antioch AD 362/3 Revisited’, Journal of Roman Studies 101: 166–84.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L., and Van Nuffelen, P.. 2015. Literature and Society in the Fourth Century AD: Performing Paideia, Constructing the Present, Presenting the Self. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van Kooten, G. H. 2010. ‘Christianity in the Graeco-Roman World: Socio-political, Philosophical, and Religious Interactions up to the Edict of Milan (313 AD)’, in Bingham, D. J. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Early Christian Thought. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
Van Kooten, G. H. 2021. ‘The Johannine Christ, the “Only-Begotten” Athena, and the Platonic Difference between “Begotten” and “Made”’, in Frey, J., Kunath, F., and Schröter, J. (eds.), Perspektiven zur Präexistenz im Früjudentum und frühen Christentum. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 209–45.Google Scholar
Van Nijf, O. 2008. ‘Athletics and Paideia’, in Borg, B. (ed.), Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 203–28.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. 2002. ‘Deux fausses lettres de Julien l’apostat (la Lettre aux Juifs, ep. 51 [Wright], et la Lettre à Arsacius, ep. 84 [Bidez]’, Vigiliae Christianae 56: 131–50.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. 2006. ‘Earthquakes in A.D. 363–68 and the Date of Libanius, Oratio 18’, Classical Quarterly 56: 657–61.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. 2011. Rethinking the Gods: Philosophical Readings of Religion in the Post-Hellenistic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. 2013. ‘The Life of Constantine: The Image of an Image’, in Johnson, and Schott, (eds.), pp. 133–49.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. 2014. ‘Not the Last Pagan: Libanius between Elite Rhetoric and Religion’, in Van Hoof, L. (ed.), Libanius. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–314.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. 2018. Penser la tolérance durant l’Antiquité tardive. Paris: Publications de l’École Pratique des Hautes Études.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. 2020. ‘The Christian Reception of Julian’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 360–97.Google Scholar
Van Renswoude, I. 2019. The Rhetoric of Free Speech in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Varner, E. R. 2012. ‘Roman Authority, Imperial Authoriality, and Julian’s Artistic Program’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 183–212.Google Scholar
Varner, E. R. 2020. ‘Innovation and Orthodoxy in the Portraiture of Constantine and His Sons’, in Baker-Briand, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 97–132.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 2010. When Our World Became Christian, 312–394, trans. J. Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vössing, K. 2020. ‘The Value of a Good Education: The School Law in Context’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 172–206.Google Scholar
Vout, C. 2006. ‘What’s in a Beard? Rethinking Hadrian’s Hellenism’, in Goldhill, and Osborne, (eds.), pp. 96–123.Google Scholar
Yarnold, E. 2000. Cyril of Jerusalem. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, F. 2002. Biblical Exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, J. 2000. Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallraff, M. 2001. ‘Constantine’s Devotion to the Sun after 324’, Studia Patristica 34: 256–69.Google Scholar
Ware, C. 2018. ‘Constantine, the Tetrarchy, and the Emperor Augustus’, in Burgersdijk, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 113–36.Google Scholar
Ware, T. 1963. The Orthodox Church: An Introduction to Eastern Christianity, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Washington, B. 2020. ‘Playing with Conventions in Julian’s Encomium to Eusebia: Does Gender Make a Difference?’, in Omissi, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 93–116.Google Scholar
Watson, A. 1999. Aurelian and the Third Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watts, E. J. 2006. City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weinbrot, H. D. 2005. Menippean Satire Reconsidered: From Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Weis, B. K. 1973. Julian. Briefe. Munich: Heimeran.Google Scholar
Weiss, D. 2017. Pious Irreverence: Confronting God in Rabbinic Judaism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, P. 2003. ‘The Vision of Constantine’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 16: 237–59.Google Scholar
Weisweiler, J. 2015. ‘Domesticating the Senatorial Elite: Universal Monarchy and Transregional Aristocracy in the Fourth Century AD’, in Wienand, (ed.), pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
Weisweiler, J. 2016. ‘From Empire to World-State: Ecumenical Language and Cosmopolitan Consciousness in the Later Roman Aristocracy’, in Lavan, M., Payne, R. E., and Weisweiler, J. (eds.), Cosmopolitanism and Empire: Universal Rulers, Local Elites, and Cultural Integration in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1982. ‘The Metre of Arius’ Thalia’, Journal of Theological Studies 33: 98–105.Google Scholar
Westerink, L.G. 2011. Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy. Edited with translation. 2nd ed. Dilton Marsh: Prometheust Trust (1st ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co, 1962).Google Scholar
Whitby, M. L. (ed.) 1998. The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Boston; Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Whitby, M. L. 1999. ‘Images of Constantius’, in Drijvers, J. W. and Hunt, D. (eds.), The Late Roman World and Its Historian: Interpreting Ammianus Marcellinus. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
White, C. 1996. Gregory of Nazianzus, Autobiographical Poems: Translated and edited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, C. 1998. Early Christian lives. Translated, Edited and with Introductions. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2001. Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2018. ‘How to Write Anti-Roman History’, in Allen, D., Christesen, P., and Millet, P. (eds.) How to Do Things with History: New Approaches to Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 365–90.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. 2015. ‘Grand Designs: Unrolling Epistles 2’, in Marchesi, I. (ed.), Pliny the Book-Maker: Betting on Posterity in the Epistles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–45.Google Scholar
Wiemer, H.-U. 1994. ‘Libanius on Constantine’, Classical Quarterly 44: 511–24.Google Scholar
Wiemer, H.-U. 1995. Libanios und Julian: Studien zum Verhältnis von Rhetorik und Politik im vierten Jahrhundert n. Chr. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Wienand, J. 2012. Der Kaiser als Sieger. Metamorphosen triumphaler Herrschaft unter Constantin I. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Wienand, J. 2013. ‘Costantino e il Sol Invictus’, in Costantino I. Enciclopedia costantiniana sulla figura e l’immagine dell’imperatore del cosiddetto Editto di Milano 313–2013. Roma: Treccani, pp. 177–95.Google Scholar
Wienand, J. 2014. Review of Girardet (2013), Sehepunkte 14 , www.sehepunkte.de/2014/12/24081.html.Google Scholar
Wienand, J. 2017. ‘Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius: The Man and His Book’, in Squire, and Wienand, (eds.), pp. 121–63.Google Scholar
Williams, F., and Wickham, L.. 2002. St. Gregory of Nazianzus: On God and Christ: the five theological orations and two letters to Cledonius. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Williams, M. S. 2008. Authorised Lives in Early Christian Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. 2001. Arius: heresy and tradition. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Williams, S., and Friell, J. G. P.,. 1994. Theodosius: The Empire at Bay. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Wilson, N.G. 1994. Photius. The Bibliotheca. A Selection Translated with Notes. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Witschel, C. 1999. Krise-Rezession-Stagnation? Der Westen des römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. Frankfurt: Marthe Clauss.Google Scholar
Witschel, C. 2004. ‘The Roman West in the Third Century A.D.’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 17: 251–81.Google Scholar
Wintjes, J. 2005. Das Leben des Libanius. Rahden: Leidorf.Google Scholar
Wright, W. C. 1913–23. The Works of the Emperor Julian. London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, W. C. 1921. Lives of the Philosophers and Sophists. London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, D. H. 1987. ‘The True Face of Constantine the Great’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 41: 493–507.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1995. Die Maske des Sokrates: das Bild des Intellektuellen in der antiken Kunst. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Zeiner-Carmichael, N. K. 2013. Roman Letters: An Anthology. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zelzer, M. 1982. Ambrosius: Epistulae et Acta. Tom. Iii: Epistularum Liber X, Epistulae Extra Collectionem, Gesta Concili Aquileiensis, Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Zucker, A. 2016. ‘Themistius’, in Falcon, A. (ed.), The Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 358–73.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Lea Niccolai, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Christianity, Philosophy, and Roman Power
  • Online publication: 07 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009299312.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Lea Niccolai, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Christianity, Philosophy, and Roman Power
  • Online publication: 07 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009299312.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Lea Niccolai, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Christianity, Philosophy, and Roman Power
  • Online publication: 07 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009299312.013
Available formats
×