Book contents
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Law and Christianity
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Themes in Understandings of Conscience in Christianity
- Part II Conscience According to Major Figures and Traditions
- Part III Applied Topics in Law and Conscience
- 15 Liberty of Conscience, Free Exercise of Religion, and the US Constitution
- 16 Religious Conscience Protections in American State Constitutions
- 17 Forced Conformity or Accommodation?
- 18 Christian Conscience and Sexual Expression Rights
- 19 Conscience and the Roman Catholic “Just War” Tradition
- 20 Institutional Conscience, Corporate Persons, and Hobby Lobby
- 21 Religion, Conscience, and the Law
- Index
- References
20 - Institutional Conscience, Corporate Persons, and Hobby Lobby
from Part III - Applied Topics in Law and Conscience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2021
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Law and Christianity
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Themes in Understandings of Conscience in Christianity
- Part II Conscience According to Major Figures and Traditions
- Part III Applied Topics in Law and Conscience
- 15 Liberty of Conscience, Free Exercise of Religion, and the US Constitution
- 16 Religious Conscience Protections in American State Constitutions
- 17 Forced Conformity or Accommodation?
- 18 Christian Conscience and Sexual Expression Rights
- 19 Conscience and the Roman Catholic “Just War” Tradition
- 20 Institutional Conscience, Corporate Persons, and Hobby Lobby
- 21 Religion, Conscience, and the Law
- Index
- References
Summary
Christopher Tollefsen addresses institutions’ conscience rights. The Supreme Court’s description in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby of the rights of religious corporations affects that question. Institutional conscience attracts more skepticism than individual conscience. Skeptics wonder if an institution can have a conscience or make others respect it. Some medical institutions, looking to exercise conscience, ask if they should be forced to offer patients all services the law allows, including abortion, sterilization, physician-aided suicide and gender transition. If they don’t, others fear unwanted costs to clients and employees. Hobby Lobby involved a closely-held corporation’s refusal to obey a law mandating the purchase of health insurance covering drugs and devices that could destroy an embryo. In other institutional conscience cases, religion could be exercised by the group-subject’s doing or abstaining from acts, as a group and for religious reasons. As in Hobby Lobby, shielding group conscience claims, through corporations, vindicates humans’ rights to achieve certain ends: business efficiencies and the goods of working as a family and as co-believers.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Christianity and the Laws of ConscienceAn Introduction, pp. 395 - 413Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Recommended Reading
- 1
- Cited by