Book contents
- Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered
- Human Rights in History
- Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I General Reflections
- Part II European Catholicism and Human Rights
- 3 Explaining the Catholic Turn to Rights in the 1930s
- 4 Catholic Social Doctrine and Human Rights
- 5 Radical Orthodoxy and the Rebirth of Christian Opposition to Human Rights
- 6 The Biopolitics of Dignity
- Part III American Protestant Trajectories
- Part IV Beyond Europe and North America
- Index
6 - The Biopolitics of Dignity
from Part II - European Catholicism and Human Rights
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 September 2020
- Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered
- Human Rights in History
- Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I General Reflections
- Part II European Catholicism and Human Rights
- 3 Explaining the Catholic Turn to Rights in the 1930s
- 4 Catholic Social Doctrine and Human Rights
- 5 Radical Orthodoxy and the Rebirth of Christian Opposition to Human Rights
- 6 The Biopolitics of Dignity
- Part III American Protestant Trajectories
- Part IV Beyond Europe and North America
- Index
Summary
This chapter traces the genealogy of the notion of “human dignity” in modern French law. My goal is to explain how and why dignity has come to be associated with national belonging and public order, as evidenced, for example, by the 2010 law banning “face coverings” in public spaces or by the recent pleas to revive “national indignity” after the attacks on the offices of Charlie Hebdo. I argue that that the definition of dignity circulating in French law since the 1990s is primarily a corporatist one. Rather than promoting abstract individual freedom, human rights, and democratic inclusion, this understanding of dignity (theoretically much closer to that of political Catholicism and personalism than to the Kantian or liberal understanding of dignity that we see in American law) insists on the obligations that the individual has toward the community, toward the social, and, in its most recent formulations, toward France. I propose to consider human dignity in the French context not as a value intrinsic to a person but as a project of biopolitical rule.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered , pp. 119 - 136Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020