Book contents
- Catullus and Roman Comedy
- Catullus and Roman Comedy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Note on the Text
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Through the Comic Looking Glass
- Chapter 2 The Best Medicine
- Chapter 3 Heroic Badness and Catullus’ Plautine Plots
- Chapter 4 Naughty Girls
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Subject Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2021
Book contents
- Catullus and Roman Comedy
- Catullus and Roman Comedy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Note on the Text
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Through the Comic Looking Glass
- Chapter 2 The Best Medicine
- Chapter 3 Heroic Badness and Catullus’ Plautine Plots
- Chapter 4 Naughty Girls
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Subject Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Catullus and Roman ComedyTheatricality and Personal Drama in the Late Republic, pp. 189 - 208Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, J. 2001. Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1964. “Anger in Juvenal and Seneca.” California Publications in Classical Philology 19:127–96.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1984. “Love Plots in Menander and His Roman Adapters.” Ramus 13:124–34.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1993. Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 2004. “Epicurean Economics.” In Fitzgerald, J. T., Obbink, D., and Holland, G. S. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World. Leiden: Brill, 131–76.Google Scholar
Augello, G. 1991. “Catullo e il folklore.” In Studi di Filologia Classica in Onore di Giusto Monaco. Universitá di Palermo, Facoltá di Lettere e Filosofia, 723–35.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. 2014. “Plautinisches im Silius? Two Episodes from Silius Italicus’ Punica.” In Perysinakis and Karakasis (2014), 259–76.Google Scholar
Bagordo, A. 2001. Beobachtungen zur Sprache des Terenz, mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung der Umgangssprachlichen Elemente. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari de rerum natura libri sex. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. 2012. A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. 1999b. “Love in Terence.” In Amor: Roma: Love and Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press, 5–29.Google Scholar
Barton, C. 1993. The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2006. The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. 1998. “Dry Pumice and the Programmatic Language of Catullus 1.” CPh 93:125–35.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. 2005. “Plautine Farce and Plautine Freedom.” In Batstone, W. and Tissol, G. (eds.), Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature. New York: Lang, 13–46.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. 2007. “Catullus and the Programmatic Poem: The Origins, Scope, and Utility of a Concept.” In Skinner, M. B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 235–53.Google Scholar
Beacham, R. C. 1999. Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Beacham, R. C. 2007. “Playing Places: The Temporary and the Permanent.” In McDonald, M. and Walton, J. M. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre. Cambridge University Press, 202–26.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2003. “The Triumph of the Absurd: Roman Street Theatre.” In Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge University Press, 21–43.Google Scholar
Bernek, R. 2004. “Catull c. 10 – Tragikomödie eines Aufschneiders. Intertextuelle Verbindungen zwischen Catull und der (römischen) Komödie.” In Janka, M. (ed.), EГΚΥΚΛΙΟΝ KHΠΙΟV (Rundgärtchen) zu Poesie, Historie und Fachliteratur der Antike. Festschrift für Hans Gärtner. Munich: Saur, 81–100.Google Scholar
Berno, F. R. 2004. “One truncus, Many Kings. Priam, Agamemnon, Pompey (Vergil, Seneca, Lucan), Part 1.” Maia 56:79–84.Google Scholar
Bernstein, F. 1998. Ludi publici: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der Öffentlichen Spiele im Republikanischen Rom. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bessone, F. 2013. “Latin Precursors.” In Thorsen, T. S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Cambridge University Press, 39–58.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. 1959. “Roman Men in Greek Himation (Romani Palliati): A Contribution to the History of Copying.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103:374–417.Google Scholar
Bloomer, M. 1997. Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Booth, J. 1997. “All in the Mind: Sickness in Catullus 76.” In Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds.), The Passions in Roman Literature and Thought. Cambridge University Press, 150–68.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 2003. Ovid and the Monuments: A Poet’s Rome. Bendigo: Aureal Publications.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1994. Fiction as History: Nero to Julian. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brachtendorf, J. 1997. “Cicero and Augustine on the Passions.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 43:289–308.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. 2015. “Foul Bodies in Ancient Rome.” In Bradley, M. (ed.), Smell and the Ancient Senses. New York: Routledge, 133–45.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 1996. “The Politics of Catullus 10: Memmius, Caesar, and the Bithynians.” Hermathena 160:45–57.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. 1988. Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal’s Third Book of Satires. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. 2005. “Marriage, Adultery, and Divorce in Roman Comic Drama.” In Smith, W. S. (ed.), Satiric Advice on Women and Marriage: From Plautus to Chaucer. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 39–70.Google Scholar
Brown, B. 1996. The Material Unconscious: American Amusement, Stephen Crane, and the Economies of Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De rerum natura IV, 1030–1287 with Prolegomena, Text, and Translation. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bungard, C. 2014. “To Script or Not to Script: Rethinking Pseudolus as Playwright.” Helios 41:87–106.Google Scholar
Butler, S. 2015. “Making Scents of Poetry.” In Bradley, M. (ed.), Smell and the Ancient Senses. New York: Routledge, 74–89.Google Scholar
Byrne, S. N. 2000. “Horace Carm. 2.12, Maecenas, and Prose History.” Antichthon 34:18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1974. “Venusta Sirmio: Catullus 31.” In Woodman, A. J. and West, D. A. (eds.), Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry. Cambridge University Press, 1–17.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 2003. “Catullus in and about Bithynia: Poems 68, 10, 28, and 47.” In Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.), Myth and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. University of Exeter Press, 165–90.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1993. The Greek Anthology: From Meleager to Planudes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caston, R. R. 2012. The Elegiac Passion: Jealousy in Roman Literature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. 2003. “Agamemnon at Rome: Roman Dynasts and Greek Heroes.” In Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.), Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. University of Exeter Press, 295–319.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. F. 1943. “The Biographical Fashion in Literary Criticism.” University of California Publications in Classical Philology 12:279–92.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. 2019. “Metatheatre.” In Dinter, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Comedy. Cambridge University Press, 136–50.Google Scholar
Cilliers, L., and Retief, F. P.. 2000. “Poisons, Poisoning and the Drug Trade in Ancient Rome.” Akroterion 45:88–100.Google Scholar
Cinaglia, V. 2014. Aristotle and Menander on the Ethics of Understanding. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 2013. “Horace’s Epistle 2.1, Cicero, Varro, and the Ancient Debate about the Origins and the Development of Latin Poetry.” In Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press, 180–204.Google Scholar
Clark, C. A. 2008. “The Poetics of Manhood? Nonverbal Behavior in Catullus 51.” CPh 103:257–81.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1971–72. “Il complesso Pompeiano del Campo Marzio e la sua decorazione scultorea.” RPAA 44:99–122.Google Scholar
Coffee, N. 2013. “Ovid Negotiates with His Mistress: Roman Reciprocity from Public to Private.” In Satlow, M. L. (ed.), The Gift in Antiquity. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 77–95.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1994. Latin Literature: A History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Copley, F. O. 1956. Exclusus Amator: A Study in Latin Love Poetry. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Cotton, H. M. 1986. “The Role of Cicero’s Letters of Recommendation: Iustitia versus Gratia?” Hermes 114:443–60.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P. 1995. “Teaching Cicero’s Speech for Caelius: What Enquiring Minds Want to Know.” CJ 90:407–22.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. G. 1993. “A Case Study in the Use of Theatre Iconography as Evidence for Ancient Acting.” Antike Kunst 36:41–58.Google Scholar
Curley, D. 2013. Tragedy in Ovid: Theater, Metatheater, and the Transformation of a Genre. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 1997. The Mask of the Parasite: A Pathology of Roman Patronage. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Davis, J. E. 2014. “Terence Interrupted: Literary Biography and the Reception of the Terentian Canon.” AJPh 135:387–409.Google Scholar
Dettmer, H. 1997. Love by the Numbers: Form and Meaning in the Poetry of Catullus. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. 1993. “Malice, Envy, and Inquisitiveness in Catullus 5 and 8.” PLLS 7:9–26.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. 1952. The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duffalo, B. 2013. The Captor’s Image: Greek Culture in Roman Ecphrasis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, A. 2006. Performance and Identity in the Classical World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dutsch, D. 2008. Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. 1996. Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elder, J. P. 1951. “Notes on Some Conscious and Subconscious Elements in Catullus’ Poetry.” HSPh 60:101–36.Google Scholar
Erasmo, M. 2005. Roman Tragedy: Theatre to Theatricality. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. D. 2009. “Prostitutes in the Portico of Pompey? A Reconsideration.” TAPhA 139:123–45.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1972. Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1977. “Philemon’s Thesauros as a Dramatisation of Peripatetic Ethics.” Hermes 105:406–21.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2002. “Orator and/et actor.” In Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.), Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge University Press, 362–76.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2008. “With Malice Aforethought: The Ethics of malitia on Stage and at Law.” In Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Kakos: Badness and Anti-Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 319–34.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M., and Hunter, R.. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2009. “The Impermanent Text in Catullus and Other Roman Poets.” In Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (eds.), Ancient Literacies. Oxford University Press, 164–85.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2016. Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferri, R. 2014. “The Reception of Plautus in Antiquity.” In Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford University Press, 767–81.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1992. “Catullus and the Reader: The Erotics of Poetry.” Arethusa 25:419–43.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2000. Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flury, P. 1968. Liebe und Liebessprache bei Menander, Plautus und Terenz. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. 2014. “Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Comedy: Menander’s Kolax in Three Roman Receptions (Naevius, Plautus and Terence’s Eunuchus).” In Olson, S. D. (ed.), Ancient Comedy and Reception: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Henderson. Berlin: De Gruyter, 180–202.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 2007. “Lucretius and Politics.” In Gale, M. R. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Lucretius. Oxford University Press, 397–431.Google Scholar
Gale, M. 2007. “Lucretius and Previous Poetic Traditions.” In Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge University Press, 59–75.Google Scholar
Garani, M. 2016. “The Negation of Fame: Epicurus’ Meta-Fama and Lucretius’ Response.” In Kyriakidis, S. (ed.), Libera Fama: An Endless Journey. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 28–44.Google Scholar
Gärtner, T. 2007. “Kritisch-exegetische Überlegungen zu Catullgedichten.” AAntHung. 47:1–41.Google Scholar
Geffcken, K. 1973. Comedy in the Pro Caelio. With an Appendix on the In Clodium et Curionem. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gellar-Goad, T. H. M. 2018. “Trouble at Sea in Juvenal 12, Persius 6 and the Proem to Lucretius, De rerum natura 2.” CCJ 64:49–69.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. 1995. “How to Win Girlfriends and Influence Them: Amicitia in Roman Love Elegy.” PCPhS 41:62–82.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. 1989. “Greek Drama in Rome: Some Aspects of Cultural Transposition.” In Scolnicov, H. and Holland, P. (eds.), The Play out of Context. Cambridge University Press, 99–109.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 1978. “Plautus’ Epidicus and the Case of the Missing Original.” TAPhA 108:81–91.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2000. “Catullus 42 and the Comic Legacy.” In Vogt-Spira, G. and Stärk, E. (eds.), Dramatische Wäldchen. Festschrift für Eckard Lefèvre. Hildesheim: Olms, 475–89.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. 2013. Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1982. “Drama.” In Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 2: Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press, 77–137.Google Scholar
Graver, M. 2002. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2000. “The Tragic Mask of Comedy: Metatheatricality in Menander.” CA 19:102–37.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 2005. The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Halkin, L. 1948. “La parodie d’une démande de triomphe dans l’Amphitryon de Plaute.” AntCl 17:297–304.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. 1973. “The Role of Women in Roman Elegy: Counter-cultural Feminism.” Arethusa 6:103–24.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2013. “Lucretius, Epicurus, and the Logic of Multiple Explanations.” In Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D., and Sharrock, A. (eds.), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosphy, Science. Oxford University Press, 69–98.Google Scholar
Hanses, M. 2014. “Plautinisches im Ovid: The Amphitruo and the Metamorphoses.” In Perysinakis and Karakasis (2014), 225–58.Google Scholar
Hanses, M. 2015. “The Life of Comedy after the Death of Plautus: The Palliata in Roman Life and Letters.” Diss., Columbia University.Google Scholar
Hanses, M. 2016. “Juvenal and the Revival of Greek New Comedy at Rome.” In Marshall, C. W. and Hawkins, T. (eds.), Athenian Comedy in the Roman Empire. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. 2005. “The Parasite’s Daughter: Metatheatrical Costuming in Plautus’ Persa.” CW 99:25–33.Google Scholar
Harries, B. 2007. “Acting the Part: Techniques of the Comic Stage in Cicero’s Early Speeches.” In Booth, J. (ed.), Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 129–48.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., and Heyworth, S. J.. 1999. “Notes on the Text and Interpretation of Catullus.” CCJ 44:85–109.Google Scholar
Harrison, S., Papanghelis, T. D., and Frangoulidis, S., eds. 2018. Intratextuality and Latin Literature. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haywood, M. S. 1984. “Epibaterion: A Study of Ancient Arrival Poetry.” Diss., University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. 1963. Le vocabulaire Latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E. A. 2004. “Masculinity and Femininity in the Laudatio Turiae.” CQ 54:185–97.Google Scholar
Herrmann, K. 2011. Nunc Levis est Tractanda Venus: Form und Funktion der Komödienzitate in der Römischen Liebeselegie. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. 2011. “Metapoetic Pseudonyms in Horace, Propertius, and Ovid.” JRS 101:51–72.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. 2015. “Lutatius Catulus, Callimachus and Plautus’ Bacchides.” CQ 65:390–95.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry, c. 60 BC–AD 20. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2001. “Lesbia, the Poet, and the Two Faces of Sappho: ‘Womanufacture’ in Catullus.” CCJ 46:28–44.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2005. Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher, and Mathematician King. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. J. 1997. “Inter tribunal et scaenam: Comedy and Rhetoric in Rome.” In Dominik, W. J. (ed.), Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. New York: Routledge, 182–97.Google Scholar
Huskey, S. 2006. “Ovid’s (Mis)Guided Tour of Rome: Some Purposeful Omissions in Tr. 3.1.” CJ 102:17–39.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2003. “The Catullan Corpus, Greek Epigram, and the Poetry of Objects.” CQ 53:206–21.Google Scholar
Iddeng, J. W. 2005. “How Shall We Comprehend the Roman I-Poet? A Reassessment of the Persona-Theory.” C&M 56:185–205.Google Scholar
Innocenti, B. 1994. “Towards a Theory of Vivid Description as Practiced in Cicero’s Verrine Oration.” Rhetorica 12:355–81.Google Scholar
James, S. L. 1998. “Introduction: Constructions of Gender and Genre in Roman Comedy and Elegy.” Helios 25:3–16.Google Scholar
James, S. L. 2003. Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
James, S. L. 2006. “A Courtesan’s Choreography: Female Liberty and Male Anxiety at the Roman Dinner Party.” In Faraone, C. A. and McClure, L. (eds.), Prostitutes and Courtesans in the Ancient World. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 224–51.Google Scholar
James, S. L. 2012. “Elegy and New Comedy.” In Gold, B. K. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 253–68.Google Scholar
James, S. L. 2016. “Fallite Fallentes: Rape and Intertextuality in Terence’s Eunuchus and Ovid’s Ars amatoria.” EuGeStA 6:86–111.Google Scholar
Janan, M. 1994. When the Lamp Is Shattered: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1984. Aristotle on Comedy: Towards a Reconstruction of Poetics II. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 2009. A Latin Lover in Ancient Rome: Readings in Propertius and His Genre. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Karakasis, E. 2014. “Cicero Comicus – Catullus Plautinus: Irony and Praise in Cat. 49 Re-examined.” In Perysinakis and Karakasis (2014), 197–224.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 2001. “Controlling Reason: Declamation in Rhetorical Education at Rome.” In Too, Y. L. (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 317–37.Google Scholar
Kernan, A. 1959. The Cankered Muse: Satire of the English Renaissance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kokoszkiewicz, K. M. 2007. “Catullus 14B, 16, 41, 43, 55, 58B: Adnotationes criticae.” Mnemosyne 60:608–27.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1986. “Love in Terence’s Eunuch: The Origins of Erotic Subjectivity.” AJPh 107:369–93.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. 2009. Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. 2001a. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. 2001b. “Arbitria Vrbanitatis: Language, Style, and Characterization in Catullus cc. 39 and 37.” CA 20:239–72.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. 2005. “‘In the Mirror of the Dance’: A Lucianic Metaphor in Its Performative and Ethical Contexts.” Mnemosyne 58:335–57.Google Scholar
LeFèvre, E. 1982. Maccus Vortit Barbare: vom Tragischen Amphitryon zum Tragikomischen Amphitruo. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
LeFèvre, E. 1999. “Plautus’ Amphitruo zwischen Tragödie und Stegreifspiel.” In Baier, T. (ed.), Studien zu Plautus’ Amphitruo. ScriptOralia 111. Tübingen: Narr, 11–50.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2013. From Polypragmon to Curiosus: Ancient Concepts of Curious and Meddlesome Behaviour. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, D. 2019. “Loud and Proud: The Voice of the Praeco in Roman Love Elegy.” In Matzner, S. and Harrison, S. (eds.), The Poetics of the Weaker Voice in Latin Literature. Oxford University Press, 149–68.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 1999. “Tragödienelemente in Plautus’ Amphitruo – Zeichen von Tragödienparodie oder Tragikomödie?” In Baier, T. (ed.), Studien zu Plautus’ Amphitruo. ScriptOralia 111. Tübingen: Narr, 177–202.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2014. “Cicero, an Interpreter of Terence.” In Papaioannou, S. (ed.), Terence and Interpretation. Cambridge University Press, 179–200.Google Scholar
Manwell, E. 2007. “Gender and Masculinity.” In Skinner, M. B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 111–28.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2006. The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marsilio, M., and Podlesney, K.. 2006. “Poverty and Poetic Rivalry in Catullus (c. 23, 13, 16, 24, 81).” AClass 49:167–81.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. J. 1990. “Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama.” CA 9:247–94.Google Scholar
May, J. 1988. Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. 2003. “Persona Problems. The Literary Persona in Antiquity Revisited.” MD 50:55–80.Google Scholar
Mayor, A. 2014. “Mithridates of Pontus and His Universal Antidote.” In Wexler, P. (ed.), History of Toxicology and Environmental Health, vol. 1: Toxicology in Antiquity. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. 2000. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, P. J. 1981. “Reading and Interpreting Catullus 8.” In Kresic, S. (ed.), Contemporary Literary Hermeneutics and Interpretation of Classical Texts. Ottawa University Press, 317–26.Google Scholar
McGinn, T. A. J. 2004. The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. 1987. Ovid: Amores. Text. Prolegomena, and Commentary. Vol. 1. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2007. “Catullus and Roman Love Elegy.” In Skinner, M. B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 399–417.Google Scholar
Minyard, J. D. 1985. Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Monti, R. C. 1981. The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1995. “How Is It Played? Tragicomedy as a Running Joke: Plautus’ Amphitruo in Performance.” Didaskalia Suppl. 1. www.didaskalia.net/issues/supplement1/moore.html.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1998. The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 2013. “Meter and Music.” In Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 89–110.Google Scholar
Moore-Blunt, J. 1974. “Catullus XXXI and Ancient Generic Composition.” Eranos 72:106–18.Google Scholar
Moretti, G. 2006. “Lo spettacolo della Pro Caelio: oggetti di scena, teatro e personaggi allegorici nel processo contro Marco Celio.” In Petrone, G. and Casamento, A. (eds.), Lo Spettacolo della Giustizia: le Orazioni di Cicerone. Palermo: Flaccovio, 139–64.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 2010. Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G. 1977. “Nescio Quid Febriculosi Scorti: A Note on Catullus 6.” CQ 27:338–41.Google Scholar
Morrelli, A. 2007. “Hellenistic Epigram in the Roman World: From the Beginnings to the End of the Republican Age.” In Bind, P. and Bruss, J. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram. Leiden: Brill, 521–41.Google Scholar
Morris, E. P. 1909. “An Interpretation of Catullus VIII.” Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 15:139–51.Google Scholar
Müller, R. 2013. “Terence in Latin Literature from the Second Century BCE to the Second Century CE.” In Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 363–79.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. 2002. “Critica Varia.” In Miller, J. F., Damon, C., and Myers, K. S. (eds.), Vertis in Usum: Studies in Honor of Edward Courtney. Stuttgart: Teubner, 67–75.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. 1996. “The Poet and the Procuress: The Lena in Latin Love Elegy.” JRS 86:1–21.Google Scholar
Németh, B. 1978. “Some Notes to the Textual Criticism of Catullus’ c. 55.” ACD 14:37–42.Google Scholar
Neumeister, C. 1993. Das Antike Rom: ein Literarischer Stadtführer. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. 1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. Hildesheim: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. 2002. “Cicero, Citizenship, and the Epicurean Temptation.” In Allman, D. and Beaty, M. (eds.), Cultivating Citizens: Soulcraft and Citizenship in Contemporary America. Oxford University Press, 3–28.Google Scholar
Nugent, G. 1994. “Mater Matters: The Female in Lucretius’ De rerum natura.” Colby Quarterly 30:179–205.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Bryhim, S. 2017. “Catullus’ Mullets and Radishes (c. 15.18–19).” Mnemosyne 70:323–30.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 1996. “Sostratus Suppl. Hell. 733: A Lost, Possibly Catullan-Era Elegy on the Six Sex Changes of Tiresias.” TAPhA 126:173–219.Google Scholar
Orlin, E. 2010. Foreign Cults in Rome: Creating a Roman Empire. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Otto, A. 1890. Die Sprichwörter und Sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Owens, W. 2001. “Plautus’ Satire of Roman Ideals.” In Tylawsky, E. and Weiss, C. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams: Twenty-Five Years at Yale. New Haven: Yale University Press, 213–27.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. 2014. Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. 1989. “Crucially Funny or Tranio on the Couch: The servus callidus and Jokes about Torture.” TAPhA 119:233–46.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. 1996. “Plautus vs. Terence: Audience and Popularity Re-examined.” AJPh 117:585–617.Google Scholar
Pascucci, G. 1979. “Praeneoterica: Lutazio, Callimaco e Plauto.” In Studi di Poesia Latina in Onore di Antonio Traglia. Vol. 1. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 109–26.Google Scholar
Pease, A. S. 1955–1958. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pedrick, V. 1986. “Qui Potis Est, Inquis? Audience Roles in Catullus.” Arethusa 19:187–209.Google Scholar
Pedrick, V. 1993. “The Abusive Address and the Audience in Catullan Poems.” Helios 20:173–96.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. 1994. “Image, Ideology and Action in Cicero and Lucretius.” Ramus 23:68–91.Google Scholar
Perysinakis, I. N., and Karakasis, E., eds. 2014. Plautine Trends: Studies in Plautine Comedy and Its Reception. Festschrift in Honour of Prof. D. K. Raios. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Piazzi, L. 2013. “Latin Love Elegy and Other Genres.” In Thorsen, T. S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Cambridge University Press, 224–38.Google Scholar
Platter, C. L. 1995. “Officium in Catullus and Propertius: A Foucauldian Reading.” CPh 90:211–24.Google Scholar
Polt, C. B. 2013. “The Humour and Thematic Centrality of the Patera in Plautus’ Amphitruo.” G&R 60:232–45.Google Scholar
Polt, C. B. 2018. “‘I found someone’… or Did I? Teaching Persona Theory through Popular Music.” CW 112:627–47.Google Scholar
Porter, J. R. 2016. “Devil in the Details: The Young Man of Plautus, Asinaria 127–248 Once Again.” Logeion 6:308–58.Google Scholar
Potkay, A. 2007. The Story of Joy: From the Bible to Late Romanticism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 2006. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Re Publica; De Legibus; Cato Maior De Senectute; Laelius De Amicitia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Preston, K. 1916. Studies in the Diction of the Sermo Amatorius of Roman Comedy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramminger, A. 1937. “Motivgeschichtliche Studien zu Catulls Basiagedichten.” Diss., Würzburg.Google Scholar
Rei, A. 1998. “Villains, Wives, and Slaves in the Comedies of Plautus.” In Joshel, S. R. and Murnaghan, S. (eds.), Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture. New York: Routledge, 92–108.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2017. Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riess, W. 2012. “Rari exempli femina: Female Virtues on Roman Funerary Inscriptions.” In James, S. L. and Dillon, S. (eds.), A Companion to Women in the Ancient World. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 1998. “Pliny’s Catullus: The Politics of Literary Appropriation.” TAPhA 128:265–304.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2004. “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horacius Cocles and Cloelia.” CPh 99:1–56.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2009. “The Exemplary Past in Roman Historiography and Culture.” In Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Historians. Cambridge University Press, 214–30.Google Scholar
Rollo, A. 2017. “La tradition des passages grecs dans le De vita Caesarum de Suétone entre le Moyen Âge et la Renaissance.” Annuaire de l'École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Section des Sciences Historiques et Philologiques. Résumés des Conférences et Travaux 148:51–68.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 1995. “Enacting the Law: Plautus’ Use of the Divorce Formula on Stage.” Phoenix 49: 201–17.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. 1986. “Love and Leisure in Roman Comedy and the Amatory Poets.” AC 55:175–89.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. 2012. When a Young Man Falls in Love: The Sexual Exploitation of Women in New Comedy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. 1969. Style and Tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1989. Horace: Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (“Ars Poetica”). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, A. 2016. The Politics of Public Space in Republican Rome. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saylor, C. F. 1975. “The Theme of Planlessness in Terence’s Eunuchus.” TAPhA 105:297–311.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 1994. “Libitina’s Bitter Gains: Seasonal Mortality and Endemic Disease in the Ancient City of Rome.” AncSoc 25:151–75.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2003. “Germs for Rome.” In Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge University Press, 158–76.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2007. “Lucretius and Roman Politics and History.” In Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge University Press, 41–58.Google Scholar
Schmidt, B. 1914. “Die Lebenszeit Catulls und die Herausgabe seiner Gedichte.” RhM 69:267–83.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, U. 2001. “Literarische Stadtführungen – von Homer bis Ammianus Marcellinus und Petrarca.” Gymnasium 108:515–37.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 1974. “Venustus, Lepidus, Bellus, Salsus: Notes on the Language of Catullus.” Latomus 33:891–94.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1989. “Otium and Eros: Catullus, Sappho, and Euripides’ Hippolytus.” Latomus 48:817–22.Google Scholar
Segal, E. 1987. Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selden, D. 1992. “Ceveat lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance.” In Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations in Antiquity. New York: Routledge, 461–512.Google Scholar
Seo, M. 2013. Exemplary Traits: Reading Characterization in Roman Poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 2008. “The Theatrical Life of Things: Plautus and the Physical.” Dictynna 5.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 2009. Reading Roman Comedy: Poetics and Playfulness in Plautus and Terence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 2013. “Terence and Non-Comic Intertexts.” In Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 52–68.Google Scholar
Silverstein, A. M., and Bialasiewicz, A. A.. 1980. “A History of Theories of Acquired Immunity.” History of Immunology 51:151–67.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 1979. “Parasites and Strange Bedfellows: A Study in Catullus’ Political Imagery.” Ramus 8:137–52.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 1981. Catullus’ Passer: The Arrangement of the Book of Polymetric Poems. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 1989. “Ut decuit cinaediorem: Power, Gender, and Urbanity in Catullus 10.” Helios 16:7–23.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 1997. “Ego Mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus.” In Hallett, J. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.), Roman Sexualities. Princeton University Press, 129–50.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 2007. “Introduction.” In Skinner, M. B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–10.Google Scholar
Sklenàř, R. 1999. “Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum civile.” AJPh 120:281–96.Google Scholar
Slater, N. 2000. Plautus in Performance: The Theatre of the Mind, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Spencer, P. E. 2017. “‘Mad’ Rhoda in Acts 12:12–17: Disciple Exemplar.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 79:282–98.Google Scholar
Starks, J. A. 2013. “Opera in bello, in otio, in negotio: Terence and Rome in the 160s BCE.” In Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 132–55.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. 1995. “Cicero on Epicurean Pleasures.” In Powell, J. G. F. (ed), Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford University Press, 145–70.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1996. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strong, A. K. 2016. Prostitutes and Matrons in the Roman World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. 2010. Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sussman, L. A. 1994. “Antony as a miles gloriosus in Cicero's Second Philippic.” Scholia 3:53–83.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. 1984. Catull: Eine Interpretation, Erster Teil: Die kleinen Gedichte (1–60). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1952. “Lucretius and the Roman Theater.” In White, M. E. (ed.), Studies in Honor of Gilbert Norwood. University of Toronto Press, 147–55.Google Scholar
Temelini, M. A. 2006. “Pompey’s Politics and the Presentation of His Theatre–Temple Complex, 61–52 BCE.” Studia Humaniora Tartuensia 7:1–14.Google Scholar
Tesoriero, C. 2006. “Hidden Kisses in Catullus: Poems 5, 6, 7 and 8.” Antichthon 40:10–18.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. 1967. “Catullus and Cicero: Poetry and the Criticism of Poetry.” CW 60:255–30.Google Scholar
Uden, J. 2006. “Embracing the Young Man in Love: Catullus 75 and the Comic Adulescens.” Antichthon 40:19–34.Google Scholar
Van der Blom, H. 2010. Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Sickle, J. 1981. “Poetics of Opening and Closure in Meleager, Catullus, and Gallus.” CW 75:65–75.Google Scholar
Vardi, A. D. 2000. “An Anthology of Early Latin Epigrams? A Ghost Reconsidered.” CQ 50:147–58.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 1985. “The Masks of Rhetoric: Cicero's Pro Roscio Amerino." Rhetorica 3:1–20.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 1993. Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. 1985. “Some Thoughts Inspired by Bergk’s Emendation gaudente in Catullus, 31.13.” BICS 32:101–8.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1989. “Patronage in Roman Society.” In Wallace-Hadrill, A. (ed.), Patronage in Ancient Society. London: Routledge, 63–87.Google Scholar
Walters, B. 2017. “The Circulation and Delivery of Cicero’s Post reditum ad populum.” TAPhA 147:79–99.Google Scholar
Walters, J. 1998. “Making a Spectacle: Deviant Men, Invective, and Pleasure.” Arethusa 31:355–67.Google Scholar
Welch, T. 2005. The Elegiac Cityscape: Propertius and the Meaning of Roman Monuments. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. 2011. “Accius, Porcius Licinus, and the Beginning of Latin Literature.” JRS 101:31–50.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. L. 1910. “Erotic Teaching in Roman Elegy and the Greek Sources. Part I.” CPh 5:440–50.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. L. 1934. Catullus and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
White, P. 1993. Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 1991. The Masks of Menander: Sign and Meaning in Greek and Roman Performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1968. Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1974. Cinna the Poet, and Other Roman Essays. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1980b. “Looking for Camerius: The Topography of Catullus 55.” PBSR 48:6–16.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1985. Catullus and His World: A Reappraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1994. Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Witzke, S. 2015. “Harlots, Tarts, and Hussies? A Problem of Terminology for Sex Labor in Roman Comedy.” Helios 42:7–27.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1966. “Some Implications of otium in Catullus 51.13–16.” Latomus 25:217–26.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. 1983. Cicero’s Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model: The Rhetoric of Crisis. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wray, D. 2001. Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. 1987. “Propertius 4.5, Ovid Amores 1.6 and Roman Comedy.” PCPhS 33:179–89.Google Scholar
Young, E. 2015. Translation as Muse: Poetic Translation in Catullus’s Rome. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zagagi, N. 1980. Tradition and Originality in Plautus: Studies of the Amatory Motifs in Plautine Comedy. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, A. 2005. “Plutarch’s Moralia 712C, Menander’s Love Plots, and Terence’s Eunuchus.” In Batstone, W. and Tissol, G. (eds.), Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature. New York: Lang, 47–59.Google Scholar