Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:44:29.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Ernest Lim
Ernest Lim
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
A Case for Shareholders' Fiduciary Duties in Common Law Asia , pp. 553 - 592
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2018 Proxy Paper Guidelines: An Overview of the Glass Lewis Approach to Proxy Advice: Hong Kong (2017).Google Scholar
2018 Proxy Paper Guidelines: An Overview of the Glass Lewis Approach to Proxy Advice: India (2017).Google Scholar
2018 Proxy Paper Guidelines: An Overview of the Glass Lewis Approach to Proxy Advice: Singapore (2017).Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D., ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’ (2000) 54 International Organization 421.Google Scholar
Abeyratne, R., ‘Judicial Independence and the Rise of the Supreme Court’ in Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Afsharipour, A., ‘The Promise and Challenge of India’s Corporate Governance Reforms’ (2010) 1 Indian Journal of law and Economics 1.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Bolton, P. ‘An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial Contracting’ (1992) 59 Review of Economic Studies 473.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Stein, J. C. ‘Growth versus Margins: Destabilizing Consequences of Giving the Stock Market What It Wants’ (2008) 3 Journal of Finance 1025.Google Scholar
Albuquerque, R. A., Durnev, A. and Koskinen, Y., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence’ (2013), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2291334.Google Scholar
Alexander, C., Chen, M., Seppi, D. and Spatt, C., ‘Interim News and the Role of Proxy Voting Advice’ (2010) 23 Review of Financial Studies 4419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allaire, Y. and Dauphin, F., ‘“Activist” Hedge Funds: Creators of Lasting Wealth? What Do the Empirical Studies Really Say?’ (Institute for Governance and Public Organizations, July 2014).Google Scholar
Allen, F. and Qian, J., ‘Comparing Legal and Alternative Institutions in Finance and Commerce’ in Heckman, J. J., Nelson, R. L. and Cabatingan, L. (eds.), Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Allen, W. T. and Kraakman, R., Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organization (Wolters Kluwer, 5th ed., 2016).Google Scholar
Almeida, H. V. and Wolfenzon, D., ‘A Theory of Pyramidal Ownership and Family Business Groups’ (2006) 61 Journal of Finance 2637.Google Scholar
Ameer, R. and Rahman, R. A., ‘The Impact of Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group Activism on the Performance of Targeted Firms in Malaysia’ (2009) 5 Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance 67.Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law of Agency, Vol. 1 (American Law Institute Publishers, 3rd ed., 2006).Google Scholar
Amira, K. and Muzere, M. L., ‘Competition Among Stock Exchanges for Equity’ (2011) 35 Journal of Banking and Finance 2355.Google Scholar
Amran, N. A. and Ahmad, A. C., ‘Board Mechanisms and Malaysian Family Companies’ Performance’ (2011) 2 Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance 15.Google Scholar
Anabtawi, I. and Stout, L., ‘Fiduciary Duties for Activist Shareholders’ (2008) 60 Stanford Law Review 1255.Google Scholar
Anand, S., ‘Shareholder Activism in India’ (2016) 4 International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature 11.Google Scholar
Ang, J. S. and Ding, D. K., ‘Government Ownership and the Performance of Government-Linked Companies: The Case of Singapore’ (2006) 16 Journal of Multinational Financial Management 64.Google Scholar
Armour, J. and Lele, P., ‘Law, Finance, and Politics: The Case of India’ (2009) 43 Law and Society Review 491.Google Scholar
Armour, J. and Payne, J. (eds.), Rationality in Company Law (Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Armour, J., ‘Enforcement Strategies in UK Corporate Governance: A Roadmap and Empirical Assessment’ in Armour, J. and Payne, J. (eds.), Rationality in Company Law (Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Armour, J., Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘Agency Problems and Legal Strategies” in Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringe, W. G. and Rock, E., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2017).Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. and Flaherty, M., ‘Temasek-Led Group Offers $2.1 Billion for Remaining Olam Shares’, Reuters, 14 March 2014.Google Scholar
Arsalidou, D., ‘Shareholders and Corporate Scrutiny: The Role of the UK Stewardship Code’ (2012) 9 European Company and Financial Law Review 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspen Institute, ‘Overcoming Short-Termism’ (2009), available at www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/overcome_short_state0909_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Association for Sustainable & Responsible Investment in Asia Report on Asia Sustainable Review (2014).Google Scholar
Atanasov, V., Black, B. and Ciccotello, C. S., ‘Law and Tunnelling’ (2011) 37 Journal of Corporation Law 1.Google Scholar
Atanasov, V., Black, B. and Ciccotello, C. S., ‘Unbundling and Measuring Tunneling’ (2014) University of Illinois Law Review 101.Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, R. S., ‘The Four Transformations of the Corporate Form’ in Choudhury, B. and Petrin, M. (eds.), Understanding the Company: Corporate Governance and Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Azizan, S. S. and Ameer, R., ‘Shareholder Activism in Family-Controlled Firms in Malaysia’ (2012) 27 Managerial Auditing Journal 774.Google Scholar
Baars, G. and Spicer, A., The Corporation: A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Back, K., Li, T. and Ljungqvist, A., ‘Liquidity and Governance’ (2015), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2350362.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M., ‘Director Primacy and Shareholder Disempowerment’ (2006) 119 Harvard Law Review 1735.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M., ‘The Case for Limited Shareholder Voting Rights’ (2006) 53 UCLA Law Review 601.Google Scholar
Baker, H. K., Nofsinger, J. R. and Weaver, D. G., ‘International Cross-Listing and Visibility’ (2002) 37 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., Ruback, R. S. and Wurgler, J., ‘Behaviorial Corporate Finance’ in Eckbo, B. E. (ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (vol 1) (Elsevier North-Holland, 2008).Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, B. N., Black, B. S. and Khanna, V., ‘The Relation Between Firm-Level Corporate Governance and Market Value: A Case Study of India’ (2010) 11 Emerging Markets Review 319.Google Scholar
Balchunas, E., ‘Vanguard’s Gain is Wall Street’s Pain as Billions Leave the Financial Industry’, Bloomberg, 1 December 2015.Google Scholar
Balding, C., Sovereign Wealth Funds: The New Intersection of Money and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bant, E. and Harding, M. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Barton, D. and Koller, T., ‘What CEOs Can Learn from Activist Investors’ (2015), available at www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/what-ceos-can-learn-from-activist-investors.Google Scholar
Barton, D., ‘Refocusing Capitalism on the Long-Term: Ownership and Trust Across the Investment Value Chain’ (2017) 33 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 188.Google Scholar
Barton, D., Manyika, J. and Williamson, S. K., ‘Finally, Evidence that Managing for the Long-Term Pays Off’ (2017) Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Baruah, B., ‘Vedanta-Cairn Merger Makes Investors Glum, Company Says It’s a Win-Win Deal’, Economic Times, 16 June 2015.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (ed.), Public and Private Enterprises in a Mixed Economy (Palgrave Macmillan, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A. and Hamdani, A., ‘Independent Directors and Controlling Shareholders’ (2016) 165 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1271.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A. and Neeman, Z., ‘Investor Protection and Interest Group Politics’ (2010) 23 Review of Financial Studies 1089.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A. and Roe, M. J., ‘A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance’ (1999) 52 Stanford Law Review 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Debate on Contractual Freedom in Corporate Law’ (2004) 89 Columbia Law Review 1395.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power’ (2005) 118 Harvard Law Review 833.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Case for Shareholder Access to the Ballot’ (2003) 59 Business Lawyer 43.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise’ (2007) 93 Virginia Law Review 675.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Myth That Insulating Boards Serves Long Term Value’ (2013) 113 Columbia Law Review 1637.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., Brav, A. and Jiang, W., ‘The Long-Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism’ (2015) 115 Columbia Law Review 1085.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A. and Hirst, S., ‘The Agency Problems of Institutional Investors’ (2017) 31 Journal of Economic Perspectives 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., Kraakman, R. and Triantis, G. G., ‘Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership, and Dual Class Equity: The Mechanisms and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash-Flow Rights’ in Morck, R. K. (ed.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership (University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Rossi, S., ‘Returns to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Clinical Study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund’ (2009) 22 Review of Financial Studies 3093.Google Scholar
Belinfanti, T., ‘Shareholder Cultivation and New Governance’ (2014) 38 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 789.Google Scholar
Bena, J., Ferreira, M. A., Matos, P. and Pires, P., ‘Are Foreign Investors Locusts? The Long-Term Effects of Foreign Institutional Ownership’ (2017) 126 Journal of Financial Economics 122.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Commerce Clearing House, 1932).Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., Mehta, P. and Mullainathan, S., ‘Ferreting out Tunneling: An Application to Indian Business Groups’ (2002) 117 Quarterly Journal of Economics 121.Google Scholar
Bhandari, V. and Arora, A., ‘Influence of Shareholders’ Activism and Firm-Level Variables on the Corporate Governance Quality in India’ (2016) 9 Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, A. K., ‘Public Enterprises – Corporate Governance and the Role of Government’ (2005), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=697381 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.697381.Google Scholar
Bhide, A., ‘The Hidden Costs of Stock Market Liquidity’ (1993) 34 Journal of Financial Economics 31.Google Scholar
Centre, Big Innovation, The Purposeful Company: Interim Report (2016).Google Scholar
Centre, Big Innovation, The Purposeful Company: The Policy Report (2017).Google Scholar
Birkmose, H. S. (ed.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar
Black, B. S. and Khanna, V. S., ‘Can Corporate Governance Reforms Increase Firm Market Values? Event Study Evidence from India’ (2007) 4 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 749.Google Scholar
BlackRock, Corporate governance and proxy voting guidelines for Hong Kong securities (2016).Google Scholar
BlackRock, Global Corporate Governance and Engagement Principles (2014).Google Scholar
BlackRock, Investment Stewardship Report: 2017 Voting and Engagement Report (2017).Google Scholar
Blair, M. M. and Stout, L. A., ‘A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law’ (1999) 85 Virginia Law Review 247.Google Scholar
BNP Paribas Asia Strategy Report, Corporate governance and shareholder activism in Asia (2014).Google Scholar
Boeger, N. and Villiers, C. (eds.), Shaping the Corporate Landscape (Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Bogg, A., Costello, C., Davies, A. C. L. and Prassl, J. (eds.),The Autonomy of Labour Law (Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Bolton, P., Scheinkman, J. and Xiong, W., ‘Executive Compensation and Short-Termist Behavior in Speculative Markets’ (2006) 73 Review of Economic Studies 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, R., ‘Advisory Firm Recommends that Institutional Investors Accept Offer for SMRT Buyout’ Straits Times, 16 September 2016.Google Scholar
Bower, J. L. and Paine, L. S., ‘The Error at the Heart of Corporate Leadership’ (2017) 95 Harvard Business Review 50.Google Scholar
Brandenburger, M. and Nalebuff, B. J., Co-Opetition (Crown Publishing, 1996).Google Scholar
Bratton, W. W. and McCahery, J. A. (eds.), Institutional Investor Activism: Hedge Funds and Private Equity, Economics and Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bratton, W. W. and Watcher, M. L., ‘The Case Against Shareholder Empowerment’ in Bratton, W. W. and McCahery, J. A. (eds.), Institutional Investor Activism: Hedge Funds and Private Equity, Economics and Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Brav, A., Jiang, W. and Kim, H., ‘The Real Effects of Hedge Fund Activism: Productivity, Asset Allocation, and Labor Outcomes’ (2015) 28 Review of Financial Studies 2723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brav, A., Jiang, W., Partnoy, F. and Thomas, R. S., ‘Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance’ in Bratton, W. W. and McCahery, J. A. (eds.), Institutional Investor Activism: Hedge Funds and Private Equity, Economics and Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Brennan, M. J. and Cao, H. H. ‘International Portfolio Investment Flows’ (1997) 52 Journal of Finance 1851.Google Scholar
Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C. and Smith, C. W. Jr., ‘Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments’ (1988) 20 Journal of Financial Economics 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkart, M., Gromb, D. and Panunzi, F., ‘Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm’ (1997) 112 Quarterly Journal of Economics 693.Google Scholar
Burrows, A. (ed.), English Private Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2007).Google Scholar
Burrows, A., ‘Post-Legislative Scrutiny, Legislative Boundary and the ‘Elusive’ Boundary’ in Dyson, M., Lee, J. and Stark, S. W. (eds.), Fifty Years of the Law Commissions: The Dynamics of Law Reform (Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Burrows, A., ‘The Relationship Between Common Law and Statute in the Law of Obligations’ (2012) 128 Law Quarterly Review 232.Google Scholar
Bursa Malaysia Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
Busch, D., Macgregor, L. and Watts, P., Agency Law in Commercial Practice (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Butler, H. N. and Ribstein, L. E., ‘Opting Out of Fiduciary Duties: A Response to the Anti-Contractarians’ (1990) 65 Washington Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Cahn, A., ‘The Shareholders’ Fiduciary Duty in German Company Law’ in Birkmose, H. (ed.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar
Cahn, A. and Donald, D. C., Comparative Company Law: Text and Cases on the Laws Governing Corporations in Germany, the UK and the USA (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cahn, A. and v. Spannenberg, M. A., ‘s 53a margin note 38’ in Spindler, G. and Stilz, E. (eds.), Akitiengesetz (C.H. Beck, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar
Cahn, A. and v. Spannenberg, M. A., ‘s 53a margin note 52’ in Spindler, G. and Stilz, E. (eds.), Akitiengesetz (C.H. Beck, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar
Cahn, A., ‘The Shareholders’ Fiduciary Duty in German Company Law’ in Birkmose, H. S. (eds.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar
Cain, M. D., Fisch, J. E., Griffith, S. J. and Solomon, S. D., ‘How Corporate Governance Is Made: The Case of the Golden Leash’ (2016) 164 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 649.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W. and Mackinlay, A. C., The Econometrics of Financial Markets (Princeton University Press, 2nd ed., 1996).Google Scholar
Canavan, J., Jones, B., and Potter, M. J., ‘Board Tenure: How Long Is Too Long?’ (2004) 28 Boards & Directors 39.Google Scholar
Carney, M. and Andriesse, E., ‘Malaysia: Personal Capitalism’ in Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Carney, R. W. and Child, T. B., ‘Changes to the Ownership and Control of East Asian Corporations Between 1996 and 2008: The Primacy of Politics’ (2013) 107 Journal of Financial Economics 494.Google Scholar
Caselli, S., Corbetta, G. and Vecchi, V. (eds.), Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure and Business Development Principles, Practices, and Perspectives (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).Google Scholar
Caton, G. L., Goh, J. and Donaldson, J., ‘The Effectiveness of Institutional Activism’ (2001) 57 Financial Analysts Journal 21.Google Scholar
Cetorelli, N. and Peristiani, S., ‘Prestigious Stock Exchanges: A Network Analysis of International Financial Centers’ (2013) 37 Journal of Banking & Finance 1543.Google Scholar
CFA Institute Report on Corporate Governance for Asian Publicly Listed Family-Controlled Firms (2017).Google Scholar
Chandrachud, A., ‘The Insulation of India’s Constitutional Judiciary’ (2010) 45 Economic and Political Weekly 38.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, D., ‘GIFT to Create Regulatory Crisis for RBI, SEBI: Mistry’, Business Standard, 23 February 2016.Google Scholar
Cheffins, B., Corporate Ownership and Control: British Business Transformed (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Chen, A. H. Y. and Lo, P. Y., ‘Hong Kong’s Judiciary Under “One Country, Two Systems”’ in Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Chen, W. (ed.), The Beijing Consensus? How China Has Changed the Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Chen, V., ‘The Statutory Derivative Action in Malaysia: Comparison with an Australian Judicial Approach’ (2017) 12 Asian Journal of Comparative Law 281.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Harford, J. and Li, K., ‘Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?’ (2007) 86 Journal of Financial Economics 279.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Cheung, Y. L., Stouraitis, A. and Wong, A. W. S., ‘Ownership Concentration, Firm Performance, and Dividend Policy in Hong Kong’ (2005) 13 Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 431.Google Scholar
Cheung, Y. L., Connelly, J. T., Jiang, P., and Limpaphayom, P., ‘Does Corporate Governance Predict Future Performance? Evidence from Hong Kong.’ (2011) 40 Financial Management 159.Google Scholar
Cheung, Y. L., Connelly, J. T., Limpaphayom, P. and Zhou, L., ‘Do Investors Really Value Corporate Governance? Evidence from the Hong Kong Market’ (2007) 18 Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 86.Google Scholar
Cheung, Y. L., Haw, I. M., Tan, W. and Wang, W., ‘Board Structure and Intragroup Propping: Evidence from Family Business Groups in Hong Kong’ (2014) 43 Financial Management 569.Google Scholar
Cheung, Y. L., Rau, P. R. and Stouraitis, A. ‘Tunnelling, Propping, and Expropriation: Evidence from Connected Party Transactions in Hong Kong’ (2006) 82 Journal of Financial Economics 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Y. L., Stouraitis, A. and Wong, A. W. S., ‘Ownership Concentration and Executive Compensation in Closely Held Firms: Evidence from Hong Kong’ (2005) 12 Journal of Empirical Finance 511.Google Scholar
China Mobile Limited Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar
Chiu, I., ‘Operationalising a Stakeholder Conception in Company Law’ (2016) 10 Law Financial Markets Review 173.Google Scholar
Chiu, I. H. Y. and Katelouzou, D., ‘From Shareholder Stewardship to Shareholder Duties: Is the Time Ripe?’ in Birkmose, H. S. (eds.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar
Chiu, I. H. Y., McKee, M. and Donovan, A. P. (eds.), The Law on Corporate Governance in Banks (Edward Elgar, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chivers, D., Shaw, B., Bryant, C. and Staynings, C. (eds.), The Law of Majority Shareholder Power, Use and Abuse (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Choi, A. ‘Concentrated Ownership and Long-Term Shareholder Value’ (2018) 8 Harvard Business Law Review 53.Google Scholar
Choper, J. H., Coffee, J. C. and Gilson, R. J., Cases and Materials on Corporations (Wolters Kluwer, 7th ed., 2008).Google Scholar
Choudhury, B. and Petrin, M. (eds.), Understanding the Company: Corporate Governance and Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
CITIC Limited Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Lang, L. H. P., ‘Who Controls East Asian Corporations – and the Implications for Legal Reform’, Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note no. 195. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Lang, L. H. P., ‘The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations’ (2000) 58 Journal of Financial Economics 81.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H. and Lang, L. H. P., ‘Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings’ (2002) 57 Journal of Finance 2741.Google Scholar
Clark, C. E. and Van Buren, H. J. B., ‘Compound Conflicts of Interest in the US Proxy System’ (2013) 116 Journal of Business Ethics 355.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C. and Palia, D., ‘The Wolf at the Door: The Impact of Hedge Fund Activism on Corporate Governance’ (2016) 1 Annals of Corporate Governance 1.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C., ‘Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement’ (2007) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 229.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C., ‘Liquidity Versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor’ (1991) 91 Columbia Law Review 1277.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C., ‘Preserving the Corporate Superego in a Time of Activism: An Essay on Ethics and Economics’ (2017) 33 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 221.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C., ‘Racing Towards the Top: The Impact of Cross-Listing and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance’ (2002) 102 Columbia Law Review 1757.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C., ‘The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications’ (1999) 93 Northwestern University Law Review 641.Google Scholar
Companies Commission of Malaysia Annual Report (2014).Google Scholar
Company Law Review, Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: The Strategic Framework (1999).Google Scholar
Conaglen, M., Fiduciary Loyalty: Protecting the Due Performance of Non-Fiduciary Duties (Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Corporate Governance Reform: The Government response to the green paper consultation (2017).Google Scholar
Council of Institutional Investors, Dual Class Companies List (March 2017).Google Scholar
Coutinho, A., ‘NSE Mulls Foreign Listing Along with Self-Listing’, Business Standard, 8 March 2016.Google Scholar
Crane, A. D., Koch, A. and Michenaud, S., ‘Institutional Investor Cliques and Governance’ (2019) 133 Journal of Financial Economics 175.Google Scholar
Credit Suisse, Asian Family Businesses Report (2011).Google Scholar
Cremers, M., Gjambona, E., Sepe, S. M. and Wang, Y., ‘Hedge Fund Activism and Long-Term Firm Value’ (2015), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2693231.Google Scholar
Cremers, M., Pareek, A., and Sautner, Z., ‘Short-Term Investors, Long-Term Investments, and Firm Value’ (2017), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2720248.Google Scholar
Crotty, J., ‘The Neoliberal Paradox: The Impact of Destructive Product Market Competition and “Modern” Financial Markets on Nonfinancial Corporation Performance in the Neoliberal Era’ in Epstein, G. A., Financialisation and the World Economy (Edward Elgar, 2006).Google Scholar
Cvijanovic, D., Dasgupta, A. and Zachariadis, K., ‘Ties That Bind: How Business Connections Affect Mutual Fund Activism’ (2016) 71 Journal of Finance 2933.Google Scholar
Dai, S. and Helfrich, C., ‘The Structure of Corporate Ownership and Control’ (2016), available at http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=fisch_2016.Google Scholar
Dal Bo, P., ‘Cooperation Under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games’ (2005) 95 American Economic Review 1591.Google Scholar
Dallas, L. L., “Short-Termism, the Financial Crisis, and Corporate Governance” (2012) 37 Journal of Corporation Law 265.Google Scholar
Dammann, J. and Hansmann, H., ‘Globalizing Commercial Litigation’ (2008) 94 Cornell Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Datar, A. P. and Balasubramanian, S., A Ramaiya Guide to the Companies Act (Lexis Nexis, 18th ed., 2014).Google Scholar
Davidoff, S. M., ‘Fairness Opinions’ (2006) 55 American University Law Review 1557.Google Scholar
Davies, P. ‘Efficiency Arguments for the Collective Representation of Workers’ in Bogg, A., Costello, C., Davies, A. C. L. and Prassl, J. (eds.), The Autonomy of Labour Law (Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Davies, P. and Worthington, S., Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 9th ed., 2012).Google Scholar
Davies, P. and Worthington, S., Gower Principles of Modern Company Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 10th ed., 2016).Google Scholar
Davies, P., ‘Shareholders in the United Kingdom’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Davies, R., Haldane, A. G., Nielsen, M. and Pezzini, S., ‘Measuring the Costs of Short-Termism’ (2014) 12 Journal of Financial Stability 16.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F. and Kim, E. H., ‘Business Ties and Proxy Voting by Mutual Funds’ (2007) 85 Journal of Financial Economics 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. M., ‘The Costs of Fiduciary Failure – and an Agenda for Remedy’ in Hawley, J. P., Hoepner, A. G. F., Johnson, K. L., Sandberg, J. and Waitzer, E. J. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Institutional Investment and Fiduciary Duty (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Dayanandan, A., Malik, S. and Nautiyal, S., ‘Effectiveness of SEBI’s Complaints Redress Systems (SCORES) in India’ (2015), available at https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/DRG_Study/DRG_II_Scores_15092015.pdf.Google Scholar
Debroy, B., ‘Some Issues in Law Reform in India” in Dethier, J. J. (eds.), Governance, Decentralization, and Reform in China, India and Russia (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar
DeHaan, E., Larcker, D. and McClure, C., ‘Long-Term Economic Consequences of Hedge Fund Activist Interventions’ (2018), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3260095.Google Scholar
Deng, X., Kang, J. K. and Low, B. S., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Value Maximization: Evidence from Mergers’ (2013) 110 Journal of Financial Economics 87.Google Scholar
DeMott, D. A., ‘Beyond Metaphor: An Analysis of Fiduciary Obligation’ (1988) Duke Law Journal 879.Google Scholar
Dethier, J. J. (eds.), Governance, Decentralization, and Reform in China, India and Russia (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar
Dharmapala, D. and Khanna, V. S., ‘Corporate Governance, Enforcement, and Firm Value: Evidence from India’ (2008), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1105732.Google Scholar
Dharwadkar, R., George, G. and Brandes, P., ‘Privatization in Emerging Economies: An Agency Theory Perspective’ 25 Academy of Management Review 650.Google Scholar
Dieleman, M., Shim, J. and Ibrahim, M., ‘Success and Succession: A Study of SGX-listed Family Firms’ (2013), available at https://bschool.nus.edu.sg/Portals/0/images/CGIO/Report/Asian%20Family%20Business%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Dignam, A. and Lowry, J., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 5th ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Dignam, A. and Lowry, J., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 8th ed., 2014).Google Scholar
Dine, J. and Koutsias, M., Company Law (Palgrave MacMillan, 6th ed., 2007).Google Scholar
Directive (EU) 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 Amending Directive 2007/36/EC as Regards the Encouragement of Long-Term Shareholder Engagement (2017).Google Scholar
Djankov, S., Hart, O., McLiesh, C. and Shleifer, A., ‘Debt Enforcement Around the World’ (2008) 116 Journal of Political Economy 1105.Google Scholar
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘The Law and Economics of Self-Dealing’ (2008) 88 Journal of Financial Economics 430.Google Scholar
Doidge, C. G., Karolyi, A. and Stulz, R. M., ‘Why Are Foreign Firms Listed in the US Worth More?’ (2004) 71 Journal of Financial Economics 205.Google Scholar
Donald, D. and Cahn, A., Comparative Company Law: Text and Cases on the Corporate Laws of Germany, the UK and the US (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Donald, D. and Cheuk, P. W. H., ‘Hong Kong’s Public Enforcement Model of Investor Protection’ (2017) 4 Asian Journal of Law and Society 349.Google Scholar
Donald, D. C. and Cheuk, P. W. H., ‘Hong Kong’s Public Enforcement Model of Investor Protection’ (2017) 4 Asian Journal of Law and Society 348.Google Scholar
Donald, D. C., Wang, J. and VanderWolk, J. P., A Financial Center for Two Empires: Hong Kong’s Corporate, Securities and Tax Laws in Its Transition from Britain to China (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Doshi, V., ‘India’s Long Wait for Justice: 27 m Court Cases Trapped in Legal Logjam’, Guardian, 5 May 2016.Google Scholar
Douglas, S. and McFarlane, B., ‘Defining Property Rights’ in Penner, J. E. and Smith, H. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Property Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Drygala, T., ‘s 53a margin note 97’ in Zollner, W. and Noack, U. (eds.), Kolner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (Carl Heymanns, 3rd ed., 2011).Google Scholar
Duggan, A., ‘Contracts, Fiduciaries and the Primacy of the Deal’ in Harding, M. and Bant, E. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Dunkley, E., ‘Lure of Tech IPOs Spurs Asian Exchanges to Seek Dual-Class Listings’, Financial Times, 23 January 2018.Google Scholar
Dvck, A. and Zingales, L., ‘Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison’ (2004) 59 Journal of Finance 537.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. and Zingales, L., ‘The Corporate Governance Role of the Media’ (2002), available at www.nber.org/papers/w9309.pdf.Google Scholar
Dyson, M., Lee, J. and Stark, S. W. (eds.), Fifty Years of the Law Commissions: The Dynamics of Law Reform (Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H., ‘Two-Agency Cost Explanation of Dividends’ (1984) 74 American Economic Review 650.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R., ‘Voting in Corporate Law’ (1983) 26 Journal of Law and Economics 395.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G., ‘The Impact of a Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance’ (2014) 60 Management Science 2835.Google Scholar
Eckbo, B. E. (eds.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (vol 1) (Elsevier North-Holland, 2008).Google Scholar
Eckert, D., ‘Shareholder and Management: A Comparative View on Some Corporate Problems in the United States and Germany’ (1960) 46 Iowa Law Review 12.Google Scholar
Edelman, J., ‘Four Fiduciary Puzzles’ in Bant, E. and Harding, M. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Edelman, J., ‘When Do Fiduciary Duties Arise?’ (2010) 126 Law Quarterly Review 302.Google Scholar
Edmans, A., ‘Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices’ (2011) 101 Journal of Financial Economics 621.Google Scholar
Edmans, A., ‘The Link Between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, With Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2012) 26 Academy of Management Perspectives 1.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, M. A., ‘The Structure of Corporation Law’ (1989) 89 Columbia Law Review 1461.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, M. A., Corporations and Other Business Organizations (Foundation Press, 9th ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Enriques, L. and Romano, A., ‘Institutional Investor Voting Behavior: A Network Theory Perspective’ (2018), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3157708.Google Scholar
Enriques, L., ‘Related Party Transactions’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
EPF Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
EPF Corporate Governance Principles and Voting Guidelines (2014).Google Scholar
EPF Voting Guidelines at Shareholders’ Meeting (2017).Google Scholar
Epstein, G. A., Financialisation and the World Economy (Edward Elgar, 2006).Google Scholar
Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F. and Oesch, D., ‘Shareholder Votes and Proxy Advisors: Evidence from Say on Pay’ (2013) 51 Journal of Accounting Research 951.Google Scholar
EU Shareholder Rights Directive, Directive (EU) 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2017).Google Scholar
European Commission Green Paper, Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions and Remuneration Policies COM (2010).Google Scholar
European Commission Green Paper, The EU Corporate Governance Framework COM (2011).Google Scholar
Faccio, M., ‘Politically Connected Firms’ (2006) 96 American Economic Review 369.Google Scholar
Faccio, M., Lang, L. H. P. and Young, L., ‘Dividends and Expropriation’ (2001) 91 American Economic Review 54.Google Scholar
Fama, E., ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’ (1980) 88 Journal of Political Economy 288.Google Scholar
Fan, J. P. H. and Wong, T. J., ‘Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia’ (2002) 33 Journal of Accounting and Economics 401.Google Scholar
Fan, J. P. H., Wei, J. K. C. and Xu, X., ‘Corporate Finance and Governance in Emerging Markets: A Selective Review and an Agenda for Future Research’ (2011) 17 Journal of Corporate Finance 207.Google Scholar
Farient Advisors Report on Global Trends in Corporate Governance (2017).Google Scholar
FCA Consultation Paper on Proposal to Create a New Premium Listing Category for Sovereign Controlled Companies (CP 17/21) (2017).Google Scholar
Ferran, E., ‘After the Crisis: the Regulation of Hedge Funds and Private Equity in the EU’ (2011) 12 European Business Organization Law Review 379.Google Scholar
Ferran, E., ‘Corporate Mobility and Company Law’ (2016) 79 Modern Law Review 813.Google Scholar
Ferrell, A., Liang, H. and Renneboog, L., ‘Socially Responsible Firms’ (2016) 122 Journal of Financial Economics 585.Google Scholar
Fichtner, J., Heemskerk, E. M. and Garcia-Bernardo, J., ‘Hidden Power of the Big Three? Passive Index Funds, Re-Concentration of Corporate Ownership, and New Financial Risk’ (2017), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2798653.Google Scholar
Financial Reporting Council, Proposed Revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code (2017).Google Scholar
Financial Services and The Treasury Bureau, Public Consultation on Company Names, Directors’ Duties, Corporate Directorship and Registration of Charges Compendium of Responses (2008).Google Scholar
Fink, L. ‘A Sense of Purpose’ (2018), available at www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry-fink-ceo-letter.Google Scholar
Finn, P., ‘The Fiduciary Principle’ in Youdan, T. G., Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Carswell, 1989).Google Scholar
Fisman, R. and Khanna, T., ‘Facilitating Development: The Role of Business Groups’ (2004) 32 World Development 609.Google Scholar
Flannigan, R., ‘Shareholder Fiduciary Accountability’ (2014) Journal of Business Law 1.Google Scholar
Fleckner, A. M. and Hopt, K. J., Comparative Corporate Governance: A Functional and International Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Fleischer, H., ‘s 53a margin note 55’ in Schmidt, K. and Lutter, M. (eds.), Aktiengesetz (Otto Schmidt, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar
Fontanills, G. A. and Gentile, T., The Stock Market Course (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001).Google Scholar
Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson, F. V. and Krishnan, M. S., ‘Customer Satisfaction and Stock Prices: High Returns, Low Risk’ (2006) 70 Journal of Marketing 3.Google Scholar
Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson, F. V. and Krishnan, M. S., ‘Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?’ (2011) 35 Journal of Banking & Finance 2388.Google Scholar
Frankel, T., ‘Fiduciary Duties as Default Rules’ (1995) 74 Oregon Law Review 1209.Google Scholar
Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Renneboog, L., ‘Who Disciplines Management in Poorly Performing Companies?’ (2001) 10 Journal of Financial Intermediation 209.Google Scholar
French, K. R., ‘Presidential Address: The Cost of Active Investing’ (2008) 63 Journal of Finance 1537.Google Scholar
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, ‘A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment’ (2005).Google Scholar
Friede, F., Busch, T. and Bassen, A., ‘ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies’ (2015) 5 Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 210.Google Scholar
Friedman, E., Johnson, S. and Mitton, T., ‘Propping and Tunneling’ (2003) 31 Journal of Comparative Economics 732.Google Scholar
Frostick, X., ‘Is There a Duty to Act in the Best Interests of the Beneficiaries?’ (2000) 83 Pension Lawyer 2.Google Scholar
Fround, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K., Financialization and Strategy: Narrative and Numbers (Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
FSA Annual Report (2006).Google Scholar
Gallagher, D., Remarks at Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals, 2013, 67th National Conference, Seattle, Washington (2013).Google Scholar
Garg, A. K., ‘Influence of Board Size and Independence on Firm Performance: A Study of Indian Companies’ (2007) 32 VIKALPA 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, J. M., Massa, M. and Matos, P., ‘Shareholder Investment Horizons and the Market for Corporate Control’ (2005) 76 Journal of Financial Economics 135.Google Scholar
Geddie, J., ‘Keppel Bribery Fine Puts Spotlight on Peer Sembcorp, Shares Slide’, Euronews 26 December 2017.Google Scholar
Geis, G. S., ‘Can Independent Blockholding Play Much of a Role in Indian Corporate Governance?’ (2007) 3 Corporate Governance Law Review 283.Google Scholar
Geis, G. S., ‘Shareholder Power in India’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Genting Berhad Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
Genting Singapore PLC Sustainability Report (2015).Google Scholar
George, C., Singapore, Incomplete: Reflections on a First World Nation’s Arrested Political Development (Ethos Books, 2017).Google Scholar
Getzler, J., ‘Ascribing and Limiting Fiduciary Obligations’ in Gold, A. S. and Miller, P. B. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Ghai, S. and Tarnowski, M., ‘From Big to Great: The World’s Leading Institutional Investors Forge Ahead’ (2016).Google Scholar
Gillian, S. L. and Starks, L. T., ‘The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States’ (2007) 19 Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 55.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J., ‘Corporate Governance and Economic Efficiency: When Do Institutions Matter?’ (1996) 74 Washington University Law Quarterly 327.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J. ‘Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Governance: Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy’ (2006) 119 Harvard Law Review 1641.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J., ‘Controlling Family Shareholders in Developing Countries: Anchoring Relational Exchange’ (2007) 60 Stanford Law Review 633.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J. and Gordon, J. N. ‘Controlling Controlling Shareholders’ (2003) 152 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 785.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J. and Gordon, J. N., ‘The Agency Costs of Agency Capitalism: Activist Investors and the Revaluation of Governance Rights’ (2013) 113 Columbia Law Review 863.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J. and Schwartz, A., ‘Constraints on Private Benefits of Control: Ex Ante Control Mechanisms versus Ex Post Transaction Review’ (2013) 169 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J., Hansmann, H. and Pargendler, M., ‘Regulatory Dualism as a Development Strategy: Corporate Reform in Brazil, the United States, and the European Union’ (2011) 63 Stanford Law Review 475.Google Scholar
Goh, C. F. and Rasli, A., ‘CEO Duality, Board Independence, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Family Firms: Evidence from the Manufacturing Industry in Malaysia’ (2014) 13 Asian Business & Management 333.Google Scholar
Goh, C. F., Rasli, A. and Khan, S. U. R., ‘Economic Incentives for Family Controlling Shareholders and the Monitoring Role of Non-Dominant Large Shareholders in Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Manufacturing Firms in Malaysia’ (2014) 17 South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 471.Google Scholar
Goh, Y. E., ‘Making SGX RegCo “truly independent”’, Straits Times, 14 August 2017.Google Scholar
Gold, A. S. and Miller, P. B. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Goldstein, S., ‘Redefining the Role of the Annual Report’ (2012), available at www.stuartzgoldstein.com/articles/role_annual_report.html.Google Scholar
Gomez, E. T. and Jomo, K. S., Malaysia’s Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 1999).Google Scholar
Gomez, E. T., Padmanabhan, T., Kamaruddin, N., Bhalla, S. and Fisal, F., Minister of Finance Incorporated: Ownership and Control of Corporate Malaysia (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar
Goodman, B., ‘Tapping the Brakes on High-Speed Trading’, Barrons, 25 February 2012.Google Scholar
Gopalana, R., Nandab, V. and Seruc, A., ‘Affiliated Firms and Financial Support: Evidence from Indian Business Groups’ (2007) 86 Journal of Financial Economics 759.Google Scholar
Gordon, J., ‘“Say on Pay”: Cautionary Notes on the U.K. Experience and the Case for Shareholders Opt-In’ (2009) 46 Harvard Journal on Legislation 323.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Gordon, J. N. and Roe, M. J., Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Goshen, Z. and Hamdani, A., ‘Corporate Control and Idiosyncratic Vision’ (2016) 125 Yale Law Journal 560.Google Scholar
Goyal, S., Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Grant, J., ‘Muddy Waters Issues Critical Olam Report’, Financial Times, 27 November 2012.Google Scholar
Grantham, R., ‘The Doctrinal Basis of the Rights of Company Shareholders’ (1998) 57 Cambridge Law Journal 554.Google Scholar
Graziadei, M., ‘Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmerman, R., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Greenfield, K., The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities (University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Grossman, N., ‘Turning a Short-Term Fling into a Long-Term Commitment: Board Duties in a New Era’ (2010) 43 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 905.Google Scholar
Gul, F. A., ‘Auditors’ Response to Political Connections and Cronyism in Malaysia’ (2006) 44 Journal of Accounting Research 931.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. and Menon, S., ‘Top Asset Management Companies, Including UTI Mutual, Tata Mutual, Abstain from Voting in Corporate Resolutions’, Economic Times, 7 August 2012.Google Scholar
Hafeez, M. M., ‘Domination of Family Owned Corporations and Problems of Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets’ (2014) 4 South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 9.Google Scholar
Hamdani, A. and Yafeh, Y., ‘Institutional Investors as Minority Shareholders’ (2013) Review of Finance 691.Google Scholar
Hannigan, B., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2012).Google Scholar
Hannigan, B., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 4th ed., 2016).Google Scholar
Hannigan, B., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 5th ed., 2018).Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’ (2001) 89 Georgetown Law Journal 439.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H., ‘Ownership of the Firm’ (1988) 4 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 267.Google Scholar
Hart, O. and Zingales, L., ‘Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value’ (2017) 2 Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting 247.Google Scholar
Hatton, K. J. and Pistor, K., ‘Maximizing Autonomy in the Shadow of Great Powers: The Political Economy of Sovereign Wealth Funds’ (2012) 50 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47.Google Scholar
Hawley, J. P., Hoepner, A. G. F., Johnson, K. L., Sandberg, J. and Waitzer, E. J. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Institutional Investment and Fiduciary Duty (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Haydock, R. S., ‘Civil Justice and Dispute Resolution in the Twenty-First Century: Mediation and Arbitration Now and for the Future’ (2000) 27 William Mitchell Law Review 745.Google Scholar
Heard, J. E. and Sherman, H. D., Conflicts of Interest in the Proxy Voting System (Investor Responsibility Research Center, 1987).Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., Nelson, R. L. and Cabatingan, L. (eds.), Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Heng, P. K., ‘The New Economic Policy and the Chinese Community in Peninsula Malaysia’ (1997) 35 Developing Economies 262.Google Scholar
Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., van Essen, M. and van Oosterhout, J. H., ‘Meta-Analyzing Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in Asia: Towards a More Fine-Grained Understanding’ (2009) 26 Asia Pacific Journal of Management 481.Google Scholar
Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Hill, J. G., ‘Images of the Shareholder’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Hill, J. G., ‘Good Activist/Bad Activist: The Rise of International Stewardship Codes’ (2018) 41 Seattle University Law Review 497.Google Scholar
HKEX Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
HKEX Cash Market Transactions Survey 2013/4 (2015).Google Scholar
HKEX Cash Market Transactions Survey 2014/5 (2016).Google Scholar
HKEX Cash Market Transactions Survey 2016 (2017).Google Scholar
Ho, J. S., ‘Bringing Responsible Ownership to the Financial Market of Hong Kong: How Effective Could it Be’ (2016) 16 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 437.Google Scholar
Ho, L., ‘Good Faith and Fiduciary Duty in English Law’ (2010) 4 Journal of Equity 29.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. and Bond, M. H., ‘The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth’ (1988) 16 Organizational Dynamics 5.Google Scholar
Holderness, C. G., ‘The Myth of Diffuse Ownership in the United States’ (2009) 22 Review of Financial Studies 1377.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Companies Registry, A Guide to Directors’ Duties (2009).Google Scholar
Hong Kong Principles of Responsible Shareholder Ownership (2016).Google Scholar
Hong, H., Kubik, J. D. and Stein, J. C., ‘Thy Neighbor’s Portfolio: Word of Mouth Effects in the Holdings and Trades of Money Managers’ (2005) 60 Journal of Finance 2801.Google Scholar
Hongkong Land Holdings Limited Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar
Hongkong Land Holdings Limited Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
Hooy, C. W. and Tee, C. M., ‘Directors’ Pay Performance: A Study on Malaysian Government Linked Companies’ (2009), available at https://cenpris.usm.my/index.php/papers/downloadable-papers/category/1-year-2009?download=41:cenpris-wp-110-09.Google Scholar
Hopt, K. J., ‘Comparative Company Law’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmerman, R., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar
HSBC Holdings Plc Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
Hu, H. and Black, B., ‘Equity and Debt Decoupling and Empty Voting II: Importance and Extensions’ (2008) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 625.Google Scholar
Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B. S., ‘Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership: Taxonomy, Implications and Reforms’ (2006) 63 The Business Lawyer 1011.Google Scholar
Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B. S., ‘Hedge Funds, Insiders, and the Decoupling of Economic and Voting Ownership: Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership’ (2007) 13 Journal of Corporate Finance 343.Google Scholar
Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B. S., ‘The New Vote Buying: Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership’ (2006) 79 Southern California Law Review 811.Google Scholar
Huang, R. H. and Howson, N. C. (eds.), Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Law: China and the World (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Huang, G. and Song, F. M., ‘The Financial and Operating Performance of China’s Newly Listed H-Firms’ (2005) 13 Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 53.Google Scholar
Huang, R. H. and Howson, N. C. (eds.), Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Law: China and the World (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Hughes, J., ‘Activist Investors Accelerate Efforts to Build Influence in Asia: Hedge Fund Efforts to Shift Policy Are Rubbing off on Regular Shareholders’, Financial Times, 26 July 2016.Google Scholar
Hulme, S., ‘The Basic Duty of Trustees of Superannuation Trusts – Fair to One, Fair to All?’ (2000) 14 Trust Law International 130.Google Scholar
Hung, M., Wong, T. J. and Zhang, T., ‘Political Considerations in the Decision of Chinese SOEs to list in Hong Kong’ (2012) 53 Journal of Accounting and Economics 435.Google Scholar
Hylton, K. N., ‘Agreements to Waive or to Arbitrate Legal Claims: An Economic Analysis’ (2000) 8 Supreme Court Economic Review 209.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, H. and Samad, F. A., ‘Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Performance of Public-Listed Family-Ownership in Malaysia’ (2011) 3 International Journal of Economics and Finance 105.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, D., Lakonishok, J. and Vermaelen, T., ‘Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases’ (1995) 39 Journal of Financial Economics 181.Google Scholar
Iliev, P. and Lowry, M., ‘Are Mutual Funds Active Voters?’ (2015) 28 Review of Financial Studies 446.Google Scholar
Iliev, P., Lins, K. V., Miller, D. P. and Roth, L., ‘Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance Around the World’ (2015) 28 Review of Financial Studies 2167.Google Scholar
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Annual Report (2016)Google Scholar
InGovern Research Services, India Proxy Season 2017: An Analysis (2017).Google Scholar
Institutional Investor Council Malaysia, Investor Stewardship and Future Key Priorities 2016 (2016).Google Scholar
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, Guidelines on Stewardship Code for Insurers in India (2017).Google Scholar
Investment Management Association of Singapore Annual Report (2017).Google Scholar
Ireland, P. ‘Financialisation and Corporate Governance’ (2009) 60 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 1.Google Scholar
Ireland, P., ‘Capitalism without the Capitalists: The Joint Stock Company Share and the Emergence of the Modern Doctrine of Separate Legal Personality’ (1996) 17 Legal History 41.Google Scholar
Ireland, P., ‘Corporate Schizophrenia: The Institutional Origins of Corporate Social Irresponsibility’ in Boeger, N. and Villiers, C. (eds.), Shaping the Corporate Landscape (Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Ireland, P., ‘Finance and the Origins of Modern Company Law’ in Baars, G. and Spicer, A., The Corporation: A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Ireland, P., ‘Property and Contract in Contemporary Corporate Theory’ (2003) 23 Legal Studies 453.Google Scholar
Ireland, P., ‘Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 32.Google Scholar
Ireland, P., ‘Limited Liability, Shareholder Rights and the Problem of Corporate Irresponsibility’ (2010) 34 Cambridge Journal of Economics 837.Google Scholar
Isa, M. and Lee, S. P., ‘The Performance of Government-Linked Companies in Malaysia’, (2016) 24 Capital Markets Review 1.Google Scholar
Isaksson, M. and Çelik, S., ‘Institutional Investors as Owners: Who Are They and What Do They Do?’ (2013), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3v1dvmfk42-en.Google Scholar
Isaksson, M. and Çelik, S., ‘Who Cares? Corporate Governance in Today’s Equity Markets’ (2013), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k47zw5kdnmp-en.Google Scholar
Ismail, Z. I., ‘GHope Fails in Bid to Sell Negara Prop’, Business Times, 22 November 2005.Google Scholar
ISS 2018 Asia-Pacific Proxy Voting Guidelines Updates: Benchmark Policy Changes for Japan, China, Hong Kong, India, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan (2017).Google Scholar
ISS Hong Kong Proxy Voting Guidelines: 2017 Benchmark Policy Recommendations (2016).Google Scholar
ITC Ltd. Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
Jaafar, S. B., James, K. and Wahab, E. A. A., ‘Remuneration Committee and Director Remuneration in Family-Owned Companies: Evidence from Malaysia’ (2012) 8 International Review of Business Research Papers 17.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. E. and Roe, M. J., ‘Public and Private Enforcement of Securities Laws: Resource-Based Evidence’ (2009) 93 Journal of Financial Economics 207.Google Scholar
Jacoby, S. M., ‘Finance and Labor: Perspectives on Risk, Inequality and Democracy’ (2008) 30 Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 17.Google Scholar
Jagannathan, R., ‘Why Only CIL? Here Are 9 Other PSU Boards Investors Can Sue’, First Post, 20 December 2014.Google Scholar
Jaggi, B. and Tsui, J., ‘Insider Trading, Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: Empirical Evidence Based on Hong Kong Firms’ (2007) 18 Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 192.Google Scholar
Jain, A., ‘India Needs to Free up Judicial Time, Address Delays to Make Doing Business Here Easy’, LiveLaw.In, 3 February 2018.Google Scholar
Jain, S., Blackford, B., Dabney, D. and Small, J., ‘What Is the Optimal Balance in the Relative Roles of Management, Directors, and Investors in the Governance of Public Corporations?’ (2014), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2407716.Google Scholar
Jameson, M., Prevost, A. and Puthenpurackal, J., ‘Controlling Shareholders, Board Structure, and Firm Performance: Evidence from India’ (2014) 27 Journal of Corporate Finance 1.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure’ (1976) 3 Journal of Financial Economics 305.Google Scholar
Jiang, G. and Wang, H., ‘Should Earnings Thresholds Be Used as Delisting Criteria?’ (2008) 27 Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 409.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. and Peng, M. W., ‘Are Family Ownership and Controlling Large Firms Good, Bad or Irrelevant?’ (2011) 28 Asia Pacific Journal of Management 15.Google Scholar
Johl, S., Jackling, B. and Joshi, M., ‘Family Generation, Leadership and Performance: The Role of Outside Directors in Indian Family Firms’ (2010) 8 Corporate Ownership and Control 646.Google Scholar
John, A., ‘What Is Bank of East Asia and Elliott’s Dispute About?’, South China Morning Post, 18 July 2017.Google Scholar
Johnson, L., ‘Relating Fiduciary Duties to Corporate Personhood and Corporate Purpose’ in Smith, D. G. and Gold, A. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Fiduciary Law (Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar
Johnson, S. and Mitton, T., ‘Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia’ (2003) 67 Journal of Financial Economics 351.Google Scholar
Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘Tunneling’ (2000) 90 American Economic Review 22.Google Scholar
Jones, M. A., Marshall, S. D., Mitchell, R. and Ramsay, I. M., ‘Company Directors’ Views Regarding Stakeholders (Research Report)’ (2007), available at http://cclsr.law.unimelb.edu.au/go/centre-activities/research/research-reports-and-research-papers/index/cfm.Google Scholar
Juliarto, A., Tower, G., Van der Zahn, M. and Rusmin, R., ‘Managerial Ownership Influencing Tunnelling Behaviour’ (2013) 7 Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal 1.Google Scholar
Kahan, M., ‘The State of State Competition for Incorporations’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Kahan, M. and Rock, E. B., ‘When the Government Is the Controlling Shareholder’ (2011) 89 Texas Law Review 1293.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O., ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’ (1974) 37 Modern Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N., ‘Public or Private Enterprise – the Issues to Be Considered’ in Baumol, W. J. (eds.), Public and Private Enterprises in a Mixed Economy (Palgrave Macmillan, 1980).Google Scholar
Kali, R. and Sarkar, J., ‘Diversification and Tunnelling: Evidence from Indian Business Groups’ (2011) 39 Journal of Comparative Economics 349.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M., ‘How Great Companies Think Differently’ (2011) 89 Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. and Vihma, A., ‘Comparing the Legitimacy and Effectiveness of Global Hard and Soft Law: An Analytical Framework’, (2009) 3 Regulation & Governance 400.Google Scholar
Karmel, R. S., ‘Should A Duty to the Corporation Be Imposed on Institutional Shareholders’ (2004) 60 Business Lawyer 1.Google Scholar
Kastiel, K., ‘Against All Odds: Hedge Fund Activism in Controlled Companies’ (2016) 2016 Columbia Business Law Review 60.Google Scholar
Katelouzou, D. and Siems, M., ‘Disappearing Paradigms in Shareholder Protection: Leximetric Evidence for 30 countries, 1900–2013’ (2015) 15 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 127.Google Scholar
Kaur, G., ‘EPF Holds the Key in MISC Buyout’, The Star Online, 11 March 2013.Google Scholar
Kay, J., ‘The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-term Decision-Making’ (2011), available at www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-kay-review-of-uk-equity-markets-and-long-term-decision-making.Google Scholar
Kaya, O., ‘High-Frequency Trading: Reaching the Limits’ (2016), available at www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000406105/High-frequency_trading%3A_Reaching_the_limits.pdf.Google Scholar
Kazmin, A., ‘Indian Companies Facing Wave of Shareholder Activism’, Financial Times, 5 December 2014.Google Scholar
Keay, A. and Adamopoulou, R., ‘Shareholder Value and UK Companies: A Positivist Inquiry’ (2012) 13 European Business Organization Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Keay, A. and Loughrey, J., ‘An Assessment of the Present State of Statutory Derivative Proceedings’ in Loughrey, J. (eds.), Directors’ Duties and Shareholder Litigation in the Wake of the Financial Crisis (Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar
Keay, A., ‘Ascertaining the Corporate Objective: An Entity Maximisation and Sustainability Model’ (2008) 71 Modern Law Review 663.Google Scholar
Keay, A., The Corporate Objective (Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar
Keay, A., The Enlightened Shareholder Value Principle and Corporate Governance (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Keay, A., Board Accountability in Corporate Governance (Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Kelly, G. and Parkinson, J., ‘The Conceptual Foundations of the Company: A Pluralist Approach’ in Parkinson, J., Kelly, G. and Gamble, A. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Company (Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
Kershaw, D., Company Law in Context: Text and Materials (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2012).Google Scholar
Khan, M. A. A., ‘Corporate Governance and the Role of Institutional Investors in India’ (2006) 7 Journal of Asia-Pacific Business 37.Google Scholar
Khanna, S., ‘The Transformation of India’s Public Sector’ (2015) 50 Economic & Political Weekly 47.Google Scholar
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. G., ‘Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups’ (2000) 55 Journal of Finance 867.Google Scholar
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. G., ‘The Evolution of Concentrated Ownership in India’ in Morck, R. K. (eds.), A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report, 2005).Google Scholar
Khanna, T. and Rivkin, J. W., ‘Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets’ (2000) 22 Strategic Management Journal 45.Google Scholar
Khanna, T. and Yafeh, Y., ‘Business Groups and Risk Sharing Around the World’ (2005) 78 Journal of Business 301.Google Scholar
Khanna, V., ‘Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Laws in India: The Arrival of the Class Action?’ in Huang, R. H. and Howson, N. C. (eds), Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Law: China and the World (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Khanna, V. and Varottil, U., ‘The Rarity of Derivative Actions in India: Reasons and Consequences’ in Puchniak, D. W., Baum, H. and Ewing-Chow, M. (eds.), The Derivative Action in Asia: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Khanna, V., ‘Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Laws in India: The Arrival of the Class Action?’ in Huang, R. H. and Howson, N. C. (eds.), Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Law: China and the World (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Kirby, C. M. G., ‘Malaysia – the Judiciary and the Rule of Law’ (1988) 41 International Commission of Jurists Review 40.Google Scholar
Klausner, M., ‘The “Corporate Contract” Today’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Klein, A. and Zur, E., ‘Entrepreneurial Shareholder Activism: Hedge Funds and other Private Investors’ (2009) 64 Journal of Finance 187.Google Scholar
Klein, A. and Zur, E., ‘The Impact of Hedge Fund Activism on the Target Firm’s Existing Bondholders’ (2011) 24 Review of Financial Studies 1735.Google Scholar
Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H. and Rock, E., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringe, W. G. and Rock, E., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2017).Google Scholar
Krehmeyer, D. and Orsagh, M., ‘Breaking the Short-Term Cycle’ (2006), available at www.corporate-ethics.org/pdf/Short-termism_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Krouse, S., Benoit, D. and McGinty, T., ‘Meet the New Corporate Power Brokers: Passive Investors’, Wall Street Journal, 24 October 2016.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. O., ‘Government Failures in Development’ (1990) 4 Journal of Economic Perspectives 9.Google Scholar
KWAP Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar
Kwok, T., ‘Why Hong Kong People Should Support Move to End Filibustering in Legislative Council’, South China Morning Post, 1 December 2017.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins’ (2008) 46 Journal of Economic Literature 285.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘Corporate Ownership Around the World’ (1999) 54 Journal of Finance 471.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘What Works in Securities Laws?’ (2006) 61 Journal of Finance 1.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., ‘Law and Finance’, (1998) 106 Journal of Political Economy 1113.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’ (1997) 52 Journal of Finance 1131.Google Scholar
Lady, Hale, ‘Fifty Years of the Law Commission: Then, Now and Next’ in Dyson, M., Lee, J. and Stark, S. W. (eds.), Fifty Years of the Law Commissions: The Dynamics of Law Reform (Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Lam, T. Y. and Lee, S. K., ‘Family Ownership, Board Committees and Firm Performance: Evidence from Hong Kong’ (2012) 12 Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 353.Google Scholar
Lamar, M., ‘Hedge Fund Elliott Calls on Bank of East Asia to Sell’, Wall Street Journal, 5 February 2016.Google Scholar
Lan, L. L., Essentials of Corporate Law and Governance in Singapore (Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar
Lan, L. L. and Varottil, U., ‘Shareholder Empowerment in Controlled Companies: the Case of Singapore’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Langford, R., ‘Best Interests: Multifaceted But Not Unbounded’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 505.Google Scholar
Langford, R., ‘The Duty of Directors to Act Bona Fide in the Interests of the Company: A Positive Fiduciary Duty? Australia and the UK Compared’ (2011) 11 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 215.Google Scholar
Langford, R. T. and Ramsay, I. M., ‘Directors’ Duty to Act in the Interests of the Company – Subjective or Objective’ (2015) Journal of Business Law 173.Google Scholar
Langford, R. T., Directors’ Duties: Principles and Application (Federation Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Larcker, D. F., McCall, A. L. and Ormazabal, G., ‘Outsourcing Shareholder Voting to Proxy Advisory Firms’ (2015) 28 Journal of Law and Economics 173.Google Scholar
Lau, J. and Mitchell, T., ‘PCCW’s Property Buy-out Plan Rejected’, Financial Times, 18 April 2008.Google Scholar
Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong Report on Class Actions (2012).Google Scholar
Lazonick, W. and O‘Sullivan, M., ‘Maximising Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance’ (2000) 29 Economy & Society 13.Google Scholar
Lean, H. H., Ting, I. W. K. and Kweh, Q. L., ‘Ownership Concentration, Family Ownership and Leverage: Evidence from Malaysia’ (2015) 52 Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 117.Google Scholar
Lee, H. P. and Foo, R., ‘The Malaysian Judiciary: A Sisyphean Quest for Redemption?’ in Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Lee, K. and Barnes, L., ‘Corporate Governance and Performance in Hong Kong Founded Family Firms: Evidence From the Hang Seng Composite Industry Index’ (2017) 51 Journal of Developing Areas 410.Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’ (1997) 4 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 111.Google Scholar
Lehavy, R., Li, F. and Merkley, K. J., ‘The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of Their Earnings Forecasts’ (2011) 86 Accounting Review 1087.Google Scholar
Letter from Lebowitz, A. D. to Fandl, H. (23 February 1988).Google Scholar
Leung, S., Richardson, G. and Jaggi, B., ‘Corporate Board and Board Committee Independence, Firm Performance, and Family Ownership Concentration: An Analysis Based on Hong Kong Firms’ (2014) 10 Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 16.Google Scholar
Li, F., ‘Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence’ (2008) 45 Journal of Accounting and Economics 221.Google Scholar
Li, T., ‘Outsourcing Corporate Governance: Conflicts of Interest and Competition in the Proxy Advisory Industry’ (2016) Management Science 1.Google Scholar
Licht, A. N., ‘Motivation, Information, Negotiation: Why Fiduciary Accountability Cannot be Negotiable’ in Smith, D. G. and Gold, A. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Fiduciary Law (Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar
Licht, A. N., ‘Lord Eldon Redux: Information Asymmetry, Accountability and Fiduciary Loyalty’ (2017) 37 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 770.Google Scholar
Liebman, B. L. and Milhaupt, C. J., ‘Reputational Sanctions in China’s Securities Market’ (2008) 108 Columbia Law Review 929.Google Scholar
Liew, C. W., Alfan, E. and Devi, S., ‘Family Firms, Expropriation and Firm Value: Evidence of the Role of Independent Directors’ Tenure in Malaysia’ (2017) 6 International Journal of Organizational Leadership 42.Google Scholar
Lim, B. L. and Yen, S. H., ‘Agency Problem and Expropriation of Minority Shareholders’ (2011) 48 Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 37.Google Scholar
Lim, E., ‘Controlling Shareholders and Fiduciary Duties in Asia’ (2018) 18 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 113.Google Scholar
Lim, E., ‘Judicial Intervention in Directors’ Decision-Making Process: Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006’ (2018) Journal of Business Law 169.Google Scholar
Lin-Wen, L. and Milhaupt, C. J., ‘We Are the (National) Champions: Understanding the Mechanisms of State Capitalism in China’ (2013) 65 Stanford Law Review 697.Google Scholar
Lintner, J., ‘The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risk Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets’ (1965) 47 Review of Economics and Statistics 13.Google Scholar
Lo, S. H. C. and Qu, C. Z., Law of Companies in Hong Kong (Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd ed., 2015).Google Scholar
Loderer, C., Roth, L., Waelchli, U. and Joerg, P., ‘Shareholder Value: Principles, Declarations, and Actions’ (2010) 39 Financial Management 5.Google Scholar
Myners, Lord, Remarks at Financial Services Secretary to the Treasury, NAPF Annual Investment Conference (2009).Google Scholar
Nicholls, Lord, ‘Trustees and their Broader Community: Where Duty, Morality and Ethics Converge’ (1996) 70 Australian Law Journal 205.Google Scholar
Walker, Lord, ‘Developing the Common Law: How Far Is too Far’ (2013) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 232.Google Scholar
Loughrey, J. (eds.), Directors’ Duties and Shareholder Litigation in the Wake of the Financial Crisis (Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar
Lund, D., ‘The Case Against Passive Shareholder Voting’ (2018) 43 Journal of Corporation Law 493.Google Scholar
Lydenberg, S., ‘Reason, Rationality and Fiduciary Duty’ (2014) 119 Journal of Business Ethics 365.Google Scholar
Ma, S. Y., ‘Role of the State in Chinese Enterprises Listed in Hong Kong’ (2002) 15 Pacific Review 279.Google Scholar
Magill, M., Quinzii, M. and Rochet, J. C., ‘A Theory of the Stakeholder Corporation’ (2015) 83 Econometrica 1685.Google Scholar
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar
Mak, Y. T. and Chew, Y. H., ‘The Singapore Report on Shareholder Meetings: Dawn of Activism’ (2017), available at https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/c48702_9b302c5fc5574cd2b89d02936db8abc3.pdf.Google Scholar
Mak, Y. T. and Chew, Y. H., ‘The Singapore Report on Shareholder Meetings: Shareholders Awaken?’ (2016), available at http://governanceforstakeholders.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Shareholder-Meetings-Volume-2-updated.pdf.Google Scholar
Mak, Y. T., ‘Shining More Light on Remuneration Disclosures and Practices in Singapore’ (2017), available at http://governanceforstakeholders.com/2017/12/01/shining-more-light-on-remuneration-disclosures-and-practices-in-singapore/Google Scholar
Malaysian Code for Institutional Investors (2014).Google Scholar
Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (2017).Google Scholar
Malenko, N. and Shen, Y., ‘The Role of Proxy Advisory Firms: Evidence from a Regression-Discontinuity Design’ (2016) 29 Review of Financial Studies 3394.Google Scholar
Malkiel, B. G., ‘Efficient Market Hypothesis’ in Neuman, P., Milgate, M. and Eatwell, J. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance (Palgrave Macmillan, 1992).Google Scholar
Mallow, M. J. and Sethi, J., ‘Engagement: The Missing Middle Approach in the Bebchuk-Strine Debate’ (2016) 12 NYU Journal of Law and Business 385.Google Scholar
Marriage, M., ‘Passive Funds Take Third of US Market’, Financial Times, 11 September 2016.Google Scholar
Massa, M. and Simonov, A., ‘Shareholder Homogeneity and Firm Value: The Disciplining Role of Non-Controlling Shareholders’ (2006), available at https://faculty.insead.edu/massimo-massa/documents/pap8b.pdf.Google Scholar
Masulis, R. W., Pham, P. K. and Zein, J., ‘Ownership and Control in Family Business Groups Around the World’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Mayer, C., ‘Who’s Responsible for an Irresponsible Business: An Assessment’ (2017) 33 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 157.Google Scholar
Mayer, C., Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Mayer, C., Firm Commitment: Why the Corporation Is Failing Us and How to Restore Trust in It (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McCahery, J. A., Moerland, P., Raaijmakers, T. and Renneboog, L. (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
McCahery, J. A., Sautner, J. and Starks, L. T. ‘Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors’ (2016) 71 Journal of Finance 2905.Google Scholar
McDermott, G. A., Embedded Politics: Industrial Networks & Institutional Change in Postcommunism (University of Michigan Press, 2003).Google Scholar
McDonald, B., ‘Law Reform in Private Law: The Role of Statutes in Supplementing or Supplanting the Common Law’ in Dyson, M., Lee, J. and Stark, S. W. (eds.), Fifty Years of the Law Commissions: The Dynamics of Law Reform (Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
McGhee, J., Snell’s Equity (Sweet & Maxwell, 32nd ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Megarry, R., ‘Investing Pension Funds: The Mineworkers Case’ in Youdan, T. G., Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Carswell, 1989).Google Scholar
Merton, R. C., ‘A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information’ (1987) 42 Journal of Finance 483.Google Scholar
Meulbroek, L. K., ‘An Empirical Analysis of Illegal Insider Trading’ (1992) 47 Journal of Finance 1661.Google Scholar
Mezzanotte, F. E., ‘The Unconvincing Rise of the Statutory Derivative Action in Hong Kong: Evidence from Its First 10 Years of Enforcement’ (2017) 17 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 469.Google Scholar
Milhaupt, C. J., ‘Chinese Corporate Capitalism in Comparative Context’ in Chen, W. (ed), The Beijing Consensus? How China Has Changed the Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Miller, P. B., ‘A Theory of Fiduciary Liability’ (2011) 56 McGill Law Journal 235.Google Scholar
Miller, P. B., ‘The Fiduciary Relationship’ in Gold, A. S. and Miller, P. B. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Mohd-Fahmi, F. and Omar, N. B., ‘Corporate Reporting on Minority Shareholders Information and Its Implication on Shareholders Activism in Malaysia’ (2005) 3 Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 17.Google Scholar
Mohd-Sulaiman, A. N. and Othman, E., Malaysia Company Law: Principles and Practices (Wolters Kluwer, 2015).Google Scholar
Mohd-Sulaiman, A. N. and Rachagan, S., ‘Shareholder Primacy, Controlling Shareholders and Malaysia’s Companies Act 2016’ (2017) 17 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 203.Google Scholar
Moore, M., ‘Private Ordering and Public Policy: The Paradoxical Foundations of Corporate Contractarianism’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 693.Google Scholar
Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D. and Yeung, B., ‘Corporate Governance, Economic Entrenchment and Growth’ (2005) 63 Journal of Financial Economics 215.Google Scholar
Morck, R. K. (eds.), A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report, 2005).Google Scholar
Morck, R. K. (eds.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership (University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Morgan, D. P. and Stiroh, K. J., ‘Bond Market Discipline of Banks: Is the Market Tough Enough?’ (2009), available at www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr95.pdf.Google Scholar
Mortimore, S. (eds.), Company Directors, Duties, Liabilities and Remedies (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Musacchio, A. and Lazzarini, S. G., Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond (Harvard University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
MSWG Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
Mulheron, R., ‘From Representative Rule to Class Action: Steps Rather Than Leaps’ (2005) 24 Civil Justice Quarterly 424.Google Scholar
Mulheron, R., The Class Action in Common Law Legal Systems: A Comparative Perspective (Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Musa, M. A., ‘The Influence of Institutional Shareholder Activism as a Corporate Governance Monitoring Mechanism in Malaysia’ (2012) 6 International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering 3110.Google Scholar
Musacchio, A., ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds: Barbarians at the Gate or White Knights of Globalization? (TN).’ (2013), available at www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=44506.Google Scholar
Musacchio, A., and Lazzarini, S. G., ‘Leviathan in Business: Varieties of State Capitalism and Their Implications for Economic Performance’ (2012), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2070942.Google Scholar
Mustafa, N. H., Latif, R. A. and Taliyang, S. M. ‘Expropriation of Minority Shareholders’ Rights: Evidence from Malaysia’ (2011) 13 International Journal of Business and Social Science 215.Google Scholar
Najid, N. A. and Rahman, , Rashidah, R. A., ‘Government Ownership and Performance of Malaysian Government-Linked Companies’ (2011) 61 International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 42.Google Scholar
Naniwadekar, M. and Varottil, U., ‘The Stakeholder Approach Towards Directors’ Duties Under Indian Company Law: A Comparative Analysis’ (2016), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2822109.Google Scholar
National Association of Pension Funds, ‘Institutional Investment in the UK: Six Years On’ (2007), available at www.plsa.co.uk/portals/0/Documents/0016_Institutional_investment_in_the_UK_six_years_on_0107.pdf.Google Scholar
National Stock Exchange of India Limited 23rd Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar
National Stock Exchange of India Limited 24th Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
Neuman, P., Milgate, M. and Eatwell, J. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance (Palgrave Macmillan, 1992).Google Scholar
Neville, M., ‘Shareholder Activism: The Dubious Shareholder Revisited’ in Birkmose, H. S. (eds.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar
Ng, S. H., Shrives, P. and Yeoh, K. K., ‘Profit Redistribution in Family-Controlled, Group-Affiliated Publicly-Listed Corporations in Malaysia’ (2013) 10 Corporate Ownership and Control 142.Google Scholar
Ng, S. H., Yeoh, K., Lau, C. K. and Shrives, P., ‘Factors Influencing the Performance of Family-Controlled Publicly-Listed Firms in Malaysia’ (2012) 1 Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research 179.Google Scholar
Nili, Y., ‘The “New Insiders”: Rethinking Independent Directors’ Tenure’ (2016) 68 Hastings Law Journal 97.Google Scholar
Nolan, R. and Conaglen, M., ‘Good Faith: What Does It Mean for Fiduciaries, and What Does It Tell Us About Them’ in Harding, M. and Bant, E. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
OECD, State Owned Enterprises in India: Reviewing the Evidence (2009).Google Scholar
OECD, The Role of Institutional Investors in Promoting Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance (2011).Google Scholar
OECD, Public Enforcement and Corporate Governance in Asia – Guidance and Good Practices (2014).Google Scholar
OECD Corporate Governance Factbook (2017).Google Scholar
Olson, M., The Rise and Decline of Nations (Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Omran, M., Atrill, P. and Pointon, J., ‘Shareholders Versus Stakeholders: Corporate Mission Statements and Investor Returns’ (2002) 11 Business Ethics: A European Review 319.Google Scholar
Orts, E. W., Business Persons: A Legal Theory of the Firm (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Othmana, S. and Borges, W. G., ‘Shareholder Activism in Malaysia: Is It Effective?’ (2015) 172 Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 427.Google Scholar
Oyedele, A., ‘Here Is the Letter the World’s Largest Investor, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, Just Sent to CEOs Everywhere’, Business Insider, 24 January 2017.Google Scholar
Pacces, A. M., ‘Controlling and Corporate Controller’s Misbehavior’ (2011) 11 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 177.Google Scholar
Pagano, M., Panetta, F. and Zingales, L., ‘Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis’ (1998) 53 Journal of Finance 27.Google Scholar
Pagano, M., Röell, A. A. and Zechner, J., ‘The Geography of Equity Listing: Why Do Companies List Abroad?’ (2002) 57 Journal of Finance 2651.Google Scholar
Palmer, P. and Scanlan, C., Socially Responsible Investment: A Guide for Pension Schemes and Charities (Key Haven Publications, 2005).Google Scholar
Panageas, S., ‘The Neoclassical Theory of Investment in Speculative Markets’ (2005), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=720464.Google Scholar
Pandey, R. ‘Effects of Controlling Family Status, Family-Impacted Governance and Top Management Characteristics on Financial and Social Performance of Listed companies in India’ (2012), available at https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:161632Google Scholar
Pandey, R., Taylor, D. and Joshi, M., ‘Governance of Large Family Companies in Traditional and New Economy Industries in India: Effects on Financial Performance’ (2011) 8 Corporate Ownership and Control 108.Google Scholar
Pargendler, M., ‘State Ownership and Corporate Governance’ (2011) 80 Fordham Law Review 2917.Google Scholar
Pargendler, M., Musacchio, A. and Lazzarini, S. G., ‘The Puzzle of Private Investment in State Controlled Firms’ (2013), Harvard Business School WP 13–071.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J., Kelly, G. and Gamble, A. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Company (Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
Parrino, R., Sias, R. W. and Starks, L. T., ‘Voting with Their Feet: Institutional Ownership Changes Around CEO Turnovers’ (2003) 68 Journal of Financial Economics 3.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. A. II., ‘The Company Mission as a Strategic Tool’ (1982) 23 Sloan Management Review 15.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E. and Smith, H. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Property Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Phadnis, S. and Dasl, A., ‘Battle for B’luru Property Lands at Govt’s Doorstep’, Times of India, 19 September 2016.Google Scholar
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd Annual Report (2014).Google Scholar
Polinsky, A. M. and Shavell, S. M. ‘The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law’ (2000) 38 Journal of Economic Literature 45.Google Scholar
Pool, V. K., Stoffman, N. and Yonker, S. E., ‘The People in Your Neighborhood: Social Interactions and Mutual Fund Portfolios’ (2015) 70 Journal of Finance 2679.Google Scholar
Poterba, J. M. and Summers, L., ‘A CEO Survey of US Companies’ Time Horizons and Hurdle Rates’ (1995) 37 Sloan Management Review 43.Google Scholar
Pretto-Sakmann, A., Boundaries of Personal Property: Shares and Sub-Shares (Hart Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Proxy Voting by Investment Advisers, Investment Advisers Act Release No. IA–2106, 68 FR 6585 (2003).Google Scholar
PTI, ‘Independent Directors Aren’t Really “Independent”, Says Sebi Chief’, National Herald, 29 June 2017.Google Scholar
Public Bank BHD Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar
Public Enterprises Survey 2015–2016 (Department of Public Enterprises, Government of India) (2016).Google Scholar
Puchniak, D. W., Baum, H. and Nottage, L. (eds.), Independent Directors in Asia: a Historical, Contextual and Comparative Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Puchniak, D. W. and Lan, L. L., ‘Independent Directors in Singapore: Puzzling Compliance Requiring Explanation’ (2017) 65 American Journal of Comparative Law 265.Google Scholar
Puchniak, D. W., Baum, H. and Ewing-Chow, M. (eds.), The Derivative Action in Asia: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Purag, M. B., Abdullah, A. B. and Bujang, I., ‘Corporate Governance and Capital Structure of Malaysian Family-Owned Companies’ (2016) 11 Journal of Business & Retail Management Research 18.Google Scholar
Qiu, L. X., ‘Which Institutional Investors Monitor? Evidence from Acquisition Activity’ (2006), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=521803.Google Scholar
Rachagan, S. and Mohd-Sulaiman, A. N., ‘Controlling Shareholders: Issues and Challenges for Shareholders’ Empowerment in Directors’ Remuneration in Corporate Malaysia’ (2013) 9 Asian Journal of Comparative Law 267.Google Scholar
Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L., ‘The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century’ (2003) 69 Journal of Financial Economics 5.Google Scholar
Rajyaakshmi, , ‘Shareholder Activism’ (2014) 10 Parikalpana-KIIT Journal of Management 23.Google Scholar
Ramirez, C. D. and Tan, L. H., ‘Singapore, Inc. Versus the Private Sector: Are Government-Linked Companies Different?’ (2003), available at www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/wp03156.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ramzy, A., ‘Hong Kong’s Courts Have Defended Its Freedoms. Is Beijing Changing That?’, New York Times, 5 February 2018.Google Scholar
Razak, N. H. A., Ahmad, A. and Joher, H. A., ‘Do Government Linked Companies (GLCs) Perform Better than Non-GLCs?’ (2011) 1 Journal of Applied Finance & Banking 213.Google Scholar
Redding, G., Wong, G. Y. Y. and Leung, W. K. W., ‘Hong Kong: Hybrid Capitalism as Catalyst’ in Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Reddy, Y. R. K., ‘The First Principles of Corporate Governance for Public Enterprises in India’ (2001), available at http://academyofcg.org/firstprinciples.htm.Google Scholar
Reimann, M. and Zimmerman, R., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Reisberg, A., ‘The Role of Institutional Shareholders: Stewardship and the Long-/Short-term Debate’ in Chiu, I. H. Y., McKee, M. and Donovan, A. P. (eds.), The Law on Corporate Governance in Banks (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Reisberg, A., ‘The UK Stewardship Code: On the Road to Nowhere?’ (2015) 15 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 217.Google Scholar
Report on Public Sector Undertaking in India (2011).Google Scholar
Responsible Shareholder Engagement: An Indian Stewardship Code, India–UK Financial Partnership (2016).Google Scholar
Reuters, ‘Proxy Advisory Firm ISS Criticises Noble Group on Audit Committee’, Business Times, 13 April 2015.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. J., ‘Fiduciary Relationships for Socially Responsible Investing: A Multinational Perspective’ (2011) 48 American Business Law Journal 597.Google Scholar
Ringe, W. G., ‘Independent Directors: After the Crisis’ (2013) 14 European Business Organization Law Review 401.Google Scholar
Ringe, W. G., ‘Shareholder Activism: A Renaissance’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Ritter, J. R., ‘The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings’ (1991) 46 Journal of Finance 3.Google Scholar
Rock, E., ‘Institutional Investors in Corporate Governance’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Rock, E., ‘Securities Regulation as Lobster Trap: A Credible Commitment Theory of Mandatory Disclosure’ (2002) 23 Cardozo Law Review 675.Google Scholar
Roe, M. J., Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate Impact (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Roe, M. J., ‘Stock Market Short-Termism’s Impact’ (2018), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3171090 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3171090.Google Scholar
Rothberg, B. and Lilien, S., ‘Mutual Funds and Proxy Voting: New Evidence on Corporate Governance’ (2006) 1 Journal of Business & Technology Law 157.Google Scholar
Sabarinathan, G., ‘Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Regulation of the Indian Securities Market’, IIM Bangalore Research Paper No. 309 (2012).Google Scholar
Saez, L., ‘India: From Failed Development State Towards Hybrid Market Capitalisation’ in Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Safi, M., ‘India’s Top Judges Issue Unprecedented Warning over Integrity of Supreme Court’, Guardian, 12 January 2018.Google Scholar
Saha, J., ‘Essays on Related Party Transactions in India’, PhD Thesis, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.Google Scholar
Saktunasingam, E. and Shanmugam, B., ‘The Consequences of Culture on Shareholder Activism in Malaysia’ (2006) 4 Journal of Applied Management and Accounting Research 45.Google Scholar
Salim, M. R. and Rahman, A., Corporate Governance in Malaysia (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).Google Scholar
Sarkar, J. and Sarkar, S., ‘Large Shareholder Activism in Corporate Governance in Developing Countries: Evidence from India’ (2000) 1 International Review of Finance 161.Google Scholar
Sarkar, J. and Sarkar, S., Corporate Governance in India (Sage Publications, 2012).Google Scholar
Schanzenbach, M. M. and Sitkoff, R. H., ‘The Law and Economics of Environmental, Social, and Governance Investing by a Fiduciary’, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3244665.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. and Lutter, M. (eds.), Aktiengesetz (Otto Schmidt, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar
Sealy, L. and Worthington, S., Sealy and Worthington’s Cases and Materials in Company Law (Oxford University Press, 10th ed., 2013).Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Board of India, (Mutual Funds) Regulations (1996).Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Board of India, Master Circular for Mutual Funds (2010).Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Board of India, Amendment to the Equity Listing Agreement – Platform for E-Voting by Shareholders of Listed Companies, Circular CIR/CFD/DIL/6/2012 (2012).Google Scholar
Securities and Futures Commission Hong Kong, Code on Unit Trusts and Mutual Funds (2010).Google Scholar
Securities and Futures Commission Hong Kong, Fund Manager Code of Conduct (2014).Google Scholar
Securities and Futures Commission, ‘SFC Obtains Court Orders for GOME to Receive $420 Million Compensation from Founder and Wife over Breaches in Share Repurchase’, SFC News Release, 7 May 2014.Google Scholar
Securities and Futures Commission, ‘SFC Seeks Court Orders against Chairman, Current and Former Directors of Minth Group Limited’, SFC News Release, 15 April 2014.Google Scholar
Securities Commission Malaysia & Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad, Best Practice Guide in Relation to Independent Advice Letters (2012).Google Scholar
Seligman, J., ‘Equal Protection in Shareholder Voting Rights: The One Common Share, One Vote Controversy’ (1986) 54 George Washington Law Review 687.Google Scholar
Sengupta, A., ‘Hidden Factors That Slow Our Courts and Delay Justice’, The Economic Times, 29 March 2017.Google Scholar
SFC Consultation Conclusions on the Principles of Responsible Ownership (2016).Google Scholar
SGX Market Statistics Report (2018).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. C. and Pollack, M. A., ‘Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance’ (2010) 94 Minnesota Law Review 706.Google Scholar
Shamsul, A. B., ‘The Economic Dimension of Malay Nationalism – The Socio-Historical Roots of the New Economic Policy and Its Contemporary Implications’ (1997) 35 Developing Economies 240.Google Scholar
Sharif, S. P., Yeoh, K. K. and Khong, K. W., ‘The Acquisition of Valuable Resources by Family-Controlled Companies in Malaysia Through Political Connections of Their Independent Directors’ (2015) 49 The Journal of Developing Areas 309.Google Scholar
Sharma, P. and Rao, A. S., ‘Successor Attributes in Indian and Canadian Family Firms: A Comparative Study’ (2000) 13 Family Business Review 313.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. U., ‘A Study of Small Shareholders’ Attitude Towards Small-Shareholder Activism’ (2016) 9 Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 67.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F., ‘Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Condition of Risk’ (1964) 19 Journal of Finance 425.Google Scholar
Shavell, S. ‘The Optimal Structure of Law Enforcement’ (1993) 36 Journal of Law and Economics 255.Google Scholar
Shavell, S., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Economic Analysis’ (1995) 24 Journal of Legal Studies 1.Google Scholar
Shirley, M. and Nellis, J., ‘Public Enterprise Reform: The Lessons of Experience’ (1991), available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/156711468779074142/Public-enterprise-reform-the-lessons-of-experience.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures (Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Wolfenzon, D., ‘Investor Protection and Equity Markets’ (2002) 66 Journal of Financial Economics 3.Google Scholar
Siems, M. and Campbell, D., Comparative Company Law: A Case-Based Approach (Hart Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar
Sim, I., Thomsen, S. and Yeong, G., ‘The State as Shareholder: The Case of Singapore’ (2014), available at https://bschool.nus.edu.sg/Portals/0/docs/FinalReport_SOE_1July2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Sindhuja, P. N., ‘Performance and Value Creation: Family Managed Business Versus Non-Family Managed Business’ (2009) 6 IUP Journal of Business Strategy 66.Google Scholar
Singapore (Bloomberg), ‘Activist Investor Quarz Urges Metro Holdings to Return Cash to Shareholders’, Straits Times, 4 October 2016.Google Scholar
Singapore Code of Corporate Governance (2018).Google Scholar
Singapore Stewardship Principles for Responsible Investors (2016).Google Scholar
Singh, S. and Watts, H., ‘Corruption, Inefficiency Eat 25% of CIL output: Sriprakash Jaiswal’ Economic Times, 19 October 2011.Google Scholar
Sjafjell, B. and Richarson, B. J. (eds.), Company Law and Sustainability: Legal Barriers and Opportunities (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Sitkoff, R. H., ‘The Economic Structure of Fiduciary Law’ (2011) 89 Boston University Law Review 1038.Google Scholar
Smith, D. G. and Gold, A. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Fiduciary Law (Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar
Smith, T., Accounting for Growth: Stripping the Camouflage from Company Accounts (Random House Business Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Sneed, E., ‘The Stockholder May Vote as He Pleases: Theory and Fact’ (1960) 22 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 23.Google Scholar
Solomon, S. D., ‘An Activism-Shy BlackRock Throws a Surprise Punch’, New York Times, 5 April 2016.Google Scholar
Song, W. L. and Szewczyk, S. H., ‘Does Coordinated Institutional Investor Activism Reverse the Fortunes of Underperforming Firms?’ (2003) 38 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 317.Google Scholar
Sorkin, A. R., ‘BlackRock’s Message: Contribute to Society, or Risk Losing Our Support’, New York Times, 15 January 2018.Google Scholar
Spamann, H., ‘The Antidirector Rights Index Revisited’ (2010) 23 Review of Financial Studies 467.Google Scholar
Spedding, L. (ed.), India: The Business Opportunity (Eastern Book Company, 2016).Google Scholar
Spindler, G. and Stilz, E. (eds.), Akitiengesetz (C.H. Beck, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar
Srinivasan, P., ‘An Analysis of Related-Party Transactions in India’ (2013), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2352791.Google Scholar
State Street Global Advisors, Proxy Voting and Engagement Principles (2014).Google Scholar
Stout, L. A. ‘The Corporation as Time Machine: Intergenerational Equity, Intergenerational Efficiency, and the Corporate Form’ (2015) 38 Seattle University Law Review 685.Google Scholar
Stout, L. A., ‘Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy’ (2002) 75 Southern California Law Review 1189.Google Scholar
Stout, L. A., ‘How Efficient Markets Undervalue Stocks: CAPM and ECMH Under Conditions of Uncertainty and Disagreement’ (1997) 19 Cardozo Law Review 475.Google Scholar
Stout, L. A., ‘The Corporation and the Question of Time’ in Choudhury, B. and Petrin, M. (eds.), Understanding the Company: Corporate Governance and Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Stout, L. A., ‘The Mechanics of Market Inefficiency: An Introduction to the New Finance’ (2003) 28 Journal of Corporation Law 635.Google Scholar
Stout, L. A., ‘The Mythical Benefits of Shareholder Control’ (2007) 93 Virginia Law Review 789.Google Scholar
Stout, L. A., ‘The Toxic Side Effects of Shareholder Primacy’ (2013) 161 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2003.Google Scholar
Stout, L. A., The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations and the Public (Berrett-Keohler, 2012).Google Scholar
StrineJr., L. E., ‘Can We Do Better by Ordinary Investors? A Pragmatic Reaction to the Dueling Ideological Mythologists of Corporate Law’ (2014) 114 Columbia Law Review 449.Google Scholar
StrineJr., L. E., ‘Corporate Power Is Corporate Purpose I: Evidence from My Hometown’ (2017) 2 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 176.Google Scholar
StrineJr., L. E., ‘Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose II: An Encouragement for Future Consideration from Professors Johnson and Million’ (2017) 74 Washington & Lee Law Review 1165.Google Scholar
StrineJr., L. E., ‘One Fundamental Corporate Governance Question We Face: Can Corporations Be Managed for the Long Term Unless Their Powerful Electorates Also Act and Think Long Term?’ (2010) 66 Business Lawyer 1.Google Scholar
Subramanian, S., ‘A Comparison of Corporate Governance Practices in State-owned Enterprises and Their Private Sector Peers in India’ (2016) 5 IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review 200.Google Scholar
Subramanian, S., ‘Proxy Advisory Industry in India’ (2016) 13 Corporate Ownership and Control 371.Google Scholar
Subramanian, S., ‘Proxy Advisory Voting Recommendations in India – An Exploratory Study’ (2017) 9 Journal of Indian Business Research 283.Google Scholar
Swadling, W., ‘Property: General Principles’ in Burrows, A. (eds.), English Private Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2007).Google Scholar
Tam, O. K. and Tan, G. S., ‘Ownership, Governance and Firm Performance in Malaysia’ (2007) 15 Corporate Governance: An International Review 208.Google Scholar
Tan, C. H., Puchniak, D. W. and Varottil, U., ‘State-Owned Enterprises in Singapore: Historical Insights into a Potential Model for Reform’ (2015) 28 Columbia Journal of Asian Law 61.Google Scholar
Tan, K. Y. L., ‘The Singapore Judiciary: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity’ in Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Tan, L. H., ‘Exploring the Question of the Separation of Ownership from Control: An Empirical Study of the Structure of Corporate Ownership in Singapore’s Top 100 Listed Companies’ (2010), available at http://docs.business.auckland.ac.nz/Doc/exploring-the-question-of-ownership-from-control.pdf.Google Scholar
Tan, L. H., ‘Family-Owned Firms in Singapore: Legal Strategies for Constraining Self-Dealing in Concentrated Ownership Structures’ (2011) 23 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 890.Google Scholar
Tan, L. H., Tan, C. H. and Long, H. C., Corporate Governance of Listed Companies in Singapore (Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd ed., 2013).Google Scholar
Tata Consultancy Services Limited Corporate Sustainability Report (2016).Google Scholar
Tergesen, A. and Zweig, J., ‘The Dying Business of Picking Stocks’, Wall Street Journal, 17 October 2016.Google Scholar
Thaler, R., ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’ (1980) 1 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39.Google Scholar
The Companies (Meetings of Board and Its Powers) Second Amendment Rules, 2014. General Circular No. 41/2014, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India (2014).Google Scholar
The Malaysian Corporate Law Reform Committee for the Companies Commission, A Consultative Document on Clarifying and Reformulating on Clarifying and Reformulating the Directors the Directors’ Role and Duties (2006).Google Scholar
The Parliamentary Debates (Authorised Edition), Fourth Series, First Session of the Twenty-Eighth Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Volume 152 (1906).Google Scholar
The Purposeful Company: Interim Report (May 2016).Google Scholar
Thillanathan, R., ‘Corporate Governance & Restructuring in Malaysia – A Review of Markets, Mechanisms, Agents & The Legal Infrastructure’ (1999), available at www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/1931380.pdf.Google Scholar
Thomas, G., Thomas on Powers (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2012).Google Scholar
Thomas, R. S. and Edelman, P. H., ‘The Theory and Practice of Corporate Voting at US Public Companies’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Thompson, R. B., ‘The Power of Shareholders in the United States’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar
Tirole, J., ‘Cognition and Incomplete Contracts’ (2009) 99 American Economic Review 265.Google Scholar
Tjio, H., Koh, P. and Lee, P. W., Corporate Law (Academy Publishing 2015).Google Scholar
Tonello, M., ‘Revisiting Stock Market Short-Termism’ (2006), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=938466.Google Scholar
Torii, T., ‘The New Economic Policy and the United Malays National Organisation, with Special Reference to the Restructuring of the Malaysian Society’ (2007) 35 Developing Economies 209.Google Scholar
Trukhtanov, A., ‘The Irreducible Core of Trust Obligation’ (2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review 342.Google Scholar
Twenty-First Report, Standing Committee on Finance (2009–2010) (Fifteenth Lok Sabha), The Companies Bill, 2009 (2010).Google Scholar
UK Corporate Governance Code (2018).Google Scholar
UK Law Commission Consultation Paper on Fiduciary Duties and Regulatory Rules (Law Commission No 236) (1992).Google Scholar
UK Law Commission Report on Fiduciary Duties of Investment Intermediaries (Law Commission No 350) (2014).Google Scholar
UK Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (Cadbury Report) (1992).Google Scholar
UK Stewardship Code (2012).Google Scholar
Upadhyay, J. P., ‘Govt Moves to Take over Unitech as NCLT Dismisses Company Board’ (2017) LiveMint, (9 Dec) 2017Google Scholar
Vafeas, N., ‘Length of Board Tenure and Outside Director Independence’, (2003) 30 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 1043.Google Scholar
Varma, J. R., ‘Corporate Governance in India: Disciplining the Dominant Shareholder’ (1997) 9 IIMB Management Review 5.Google Scholar
Varottil, U., ‘The Advent of Shareholder Activism in India’ (2012) 1 Journal on Governance 582.Google Scholar
Varottil, U. and Naujoks, R., ‘Corporate Governance’ in Spedding, L. (ed), India: The Business Opportunity (Eastern Book Company, 2016).Google Scholar
Wahab, E. A. A., How, J. C. Y. and Verhoeven, P., ‘The Impact of the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance: Compliance, Institutional Investors and Stock Performance’ (2007) 3 Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 106.Google Scholar
Walker, D., ‘A Review of Corporate Governance in Banks and Financial Institutions: Final Recommendations’ (2009), available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/walker_review_261109.pdf.Google Scholar
Wan, W. Y., ‘Independent Financial Advisers’ Opinions for Public Takeovers and Related Party Transactions in Singapore’ (2012) 30 Corporate and Securities Law Journal 32.Google Scholar
Wan, W. Y., Chen, C. and Goo, S. H., ‘Public and Private Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Laws: An Empirical Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore’ (2019) 20 European Business Organization Law Review 319.Google Scholar
Wang, J. and Song, Lin., ‘Timeliness of Annual Reports of Chinese Listed Companies’ (2006) 4 Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 241.Google Scholar
Wasiuzzaman, S. and Lim, K. H., ‘Does Institutional Investors’ Monitoring Substitute for Litigation in Curbing Insider Trading? The Case of Malaysia’ (2017) 43 Managerial Finance 141.Google Scholar
Watchman, P., Anstee-Wedderburn, J. and Shipway, L., ‘Fiduciary Duties in the 21st Century: A UK Perspective’ (2005) 19 Trust Law International 127.Google Scholar
Watson, A., ‘Society’s Choice and Legal Change’ (1980) 9 Hofstra Law Review 1473.Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplant: An Approach to Comparative Law (University of Georgia Press, 2nd ed., 1993).Google Scholar
Watson, S., ‘Conceptual Confusion: Organs, Agents and Identity in the English Courts’ (2011) 23 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 762.Google Scholar
Watts, P. and Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (Sweet & Maxwell, 20th ed., 2014).Google Scholar
Watts, P., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (Sweet & Maxwell, 21st ed., 2017).Google Scholar
Watts, P., ‘Directors as Agents: Some Aspects of Disputed Territories’ in Busch, D., Macgregor, L. and Watts, P., Agency Law in Commercial Practice (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Watts, W., ‘BlackRock Warns CEOs Against Buybacks That Only Provide Fleeting Gains’, Market Watch, 24 January 2017.Google Scholar
Wee, M. S. and Puchniak, D. W., ‘Derivative Actions in Singapore: Mundanely Non-Asian, Intriguingly Non-American and At the Forefront of the Commonwealth’ in Puchniak, D. W., Baum, H. and Ewing-Chow, M. (eds.), The Derivative Action in Asia: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Wille, K. and Burgos, J., ‘Activists Take Aim at Singapore’s “Buy, Pray, Hope” Model’ Bloomberg, 4 November 2016.Google Scholar
Wille, K., ‘New Singapore Activist Hedge Fund Seeks to Shake Up Companies’ Bloomberg, 4 February 2015.Google Scholar
Williams, M. P. and Taylor, D. W., ‘Corporate Propping Through Related-Party Transactions’ (2013) 55 International Journal of Law and Management 28.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Palgrave Macmillan, 1983).Google Scholar
Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wong, F., ‘Shareholder Engagement and Activism Under the Radar: Empirical Evidence from Hong Kong (2003–15) – Rethinking of Disclosure Interests Regime’ (2017), available at http://papers.ssrm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2725318.Google Scholar
Wong, S., ‘Why Stewardship is Proving Elusive for Institutional Investors’ (2010) Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 406.Google Scholar
Woo, J., ‘Keppel O&M Bribery Scandal: Elaborate Scheme Used to Disguise Bribes, Says US Attorney’, Straits Times, 24 December 2017.Google Scholar
Woo, J., ‘Keppel O&M to Pay US$422 m in Fines to Settle Bribery Probe’, Straits Times, 24 December 2017.Google Scholar
World Bank Group Flagship Report, Doing Business 2018: Reforming to Create Jobs (2018).Google Scholar
World Justice Project Rule of Law Index (2017–2018) (2018).Google Scholar
Worthington, S., Robertson, A. and Virgo, G., Revolution and Evolution in Private Law (Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Worthington, S., Sealy & Worthington’s Text, Cases & Materials in Company Law (Oxford University Press, 11th ed., 2016).Google Scholar
Wymeersch, E., ‘Shareholders in Action: Towards a New Company Paradigm?’ (2007) 4 European Law Journal 50.Google Scholar
Yatim, P., Kent, P. and Clarkson, P., ‘Governance Structures, Ethnicity, and Audit Fees of Malaysian Listed Firms’ (2006) 21 Managerial Auditing Journal 757.Google Scholar
Yermack, D., ‘Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance’ (2010) 2 Annual Review of Financial Economics 103.Google Scholar
Yeung, H. W., ‘Limits to the Growth of Family‐Owned Business? The Case of Chinese Transnational Corporations from Hong Kong’ (2000) 13 Family Business Review 55.Google Scholar
Ying, Q. and Wang, L., ‘Propping by Controlling Shareholders, Wealth Transfer and Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies’ (2013) 6 China Journal of Accounting Research 133.Google Scholar
Yiu, E., ‘Why Former Link Boss Put People before Profits’, South China Morning Post, 28 January 2008.Google Scholar
Yoshimori, M., ‘Whose Company Is It? The Concept of Corporations in Japan and the West’ (1995) 28 Long Range Planning 33.Google Scholar
Youdan, T. G., Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Carswell, 1989).Google Scholar
Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D. and Jiang, Y., ‘Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal-Principal Perspective’ (2008) 45 Journal of Management Studies 196.Google Scholar
Yvan, A., ‘The Case for and Against Activist Hedge Funds’ (2015), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2613154 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2613154.Google Scholar
Zembrowski, P., ‘Hong Kong Domiciled Funds Growth Outpaces Singapore’, International Advisor, 8 August 2017.Google Scholar
Zollner, W. and Noack, U. (eds.), Kolner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (Carl Heymanns, 3rd ed., 2011).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Ernest Lim, National University of Singapore
  • Book: A Case for Shareholders' Fiduciary Duties in Common Law Asia
  • Online publication: 26 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108629065.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Ernest Lim, National University of Singapore
  • Book: A Case for Shareholders' Fiduciary Duties in Common Law Asia
  • Online publication: 26 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108629065.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Ernest Lim, National University of Singapore
  • Book: A Case for Shareholders' Fiduciary Duties in Common Law Asia
  • Online publication: 26 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108629065.015
Available formats
×