Book contents
- Caring, Empathy, and the Commons
- Caring, Empathy, and the Commons
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Constructing a Relational Theory of Collective Action
- 3 Further Justifications of the Relational Theory
- 4 Connectedness and Pro-Social/Pro-Environmental Behavior
- 5 Illustrations
- 6 Institutional Considerations
- 7 Prospects of Relationality
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2023
Book contents
- Caring, Empathy, and the Commons
- Caring, Empathy, and the Commons
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Constructing a Relational Theory of Collective Action
- 3 Further Justifications of the Relational Theory
- 4 Connectedness and Pro-Social/Pro-Environmental Behavior
- 5 Illustrations
- 6 Institutional Considerations
- 7 Prospects of Relationality
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Caring, Empathy, and the CommonsA Relational Theory of Collective Action, pp. 135 - 162Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Agrawal, A., & Goyal, S. (2001). Group size and collective action: Third party monitoring in common pool resources. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 63–93.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, 29(4), 485–514.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A., Narain, S., & Sharma, A. (2017). The global commons and environmental justice – climate change. In Thompson, P. (Ed.), Environmental Justice (pp. 171–199). Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Aksoy, B., & Palma, M. A. (2019). The effects of scarcity on cheating and in-group favoritism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 165, 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, J. (1993). Exadaptations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 283–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althor, G., Watson, J. E., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 20281–20286.Google Scholar
Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place Attachment. Human Behavior and Environment, 1st Edition. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2015). Toward a psychology of human-animal relations. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 6–47.Google Scholar
Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, M. A. (2013). Robustness of social? ecological systems: Implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 513–536.Google Scholar
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., Bousquet, F., Cardenas, J. C., Castillo, D., Lopez, M. C., … & Wutich, A. (2011). The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1571–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, K. (2006). Understanding decentralized forest governance: An application of the institutional analysis and development framework. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(1), 25–35.Google Scholar
Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 71–93.Google Scholar
Andersson, K. P., Chang, K., & Molina-Garzón, A. (2020). Voluntary leadership and the emergence of institutions for self-governance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(44), 27292–27299.Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.Google Scholar
Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (1997). Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Araral, E. (2014). Ostrom, hardin and the commons: A critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 11–23.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanases, S. Z., & Sanchez, S. L. (2020). “A Caesar for our time”: Toward empathy and perspective-taking in new teachers’ drama practices in diverse classrooms. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 25(2), 236–255.Google Scholar
Aumann, R., & Shapley, L. (1976). Long-term competition: A game-theoretic analysis. Mimeo, Hebrew University. Reprinted in: Megiddo, N. (Ed.), 1994. Essays in Game Theory in Honor of Michael Maschler (pp. 1–15). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., & Jeffries, C. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 600–603.Google Scholar
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS One, 8(1), e55341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (1996). Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barazza, J. A., & Zak, P. J. (2013). Chapter 18. Oxytocin instantiates empathy and produces prosocial behaviours. In Choleris, E., Pfaff, D. W., & Kavaliers, M. (Eds.), Oxytocin, Vasopressin and Related Peptides in the Regulation of Behaviour (pp. 331–342). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. (2012). Harnessing the power of reputation: Strengths and limits for promoting cooperative behaviors. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(5), 147470491201000509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barclay, P., & van Vugt, M. (2015). The evolutionary psychology of human prosociality: Adaptations, byproducts, and mistakes. In Schroeder, D. A., & Graziano, W. G. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 37–60). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barraza, J., & Zak, P. (2009). Empathy toward strangers triggers oxytocin release and subsequent generosity. New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1), 182–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, K., & Turnbull, N. (2019). Relational public administration: A synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. Public Management Review, 1–23.Google Scholar
Batavia, C., Bruskotter, J. T., Jones, J. A., Vucetich, J. A., Gosnell, H., & Nelson, M. P. (2018). Nature for whom? How type of beneficiary influences the effectiveness of conservation outreach messages. Biological Conservation, 228, 158–166.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65–122). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (Ed.), (2011). Altruism in Humans (p. 329). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., & Moran, T. (1999). Empathy‐induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7), 909–924.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107–122.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., Lishner, D. A., Tsang, J., Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Chapter 35. Empathy and altruism. In Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 161–174). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. et al., (2002). “Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666., doi:10.1177/014616702237647.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Pate, S., Lawless, H., Sparkman, P., Lambers, S., & Worman, B. (1979). Helping under conditions of common threat: Increased “we-feeling” or ensuring reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(4), 410–414.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (1987). General and concrete others. In Benhabib, S., & Cornell, D. (Eds.), Feminism as Critique (pp. 77–96). Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Benjamin, P., Lam, W. F., Ostrom, E., & Shivakoti, G. (1994). Institutions, Incentives and Irrigation in Nepal. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. (2003). Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 12–29.Google Scholar
Berchin, I. I., Valduga, I. B., Garcia, J., & de Andrade, J. B. S. O. (2017). Climate change and forced migrations: An effort towards recognizing climate refugees. Geoforum, 84, 147–150.Google Scholar
Berenguer, J. (2007). “The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors.” Environment & Behavior, 39(2):269–283.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. (2002). Cross-scale institutional linkages: Perspectives from the bottom up. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., & Weber, E. U. (Eds.), The Drama of the Commons (pp. 293–321). National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262.Google Scholar
Bern, C. et al. (1993). Risk factors for mortality in the Bangladesh cyclone of 1991. Bull World Health Organ, 71(1), 73.Google Scholar
Bertin, P., Nera, K., Hamer, K., Uhl-Haedicke, I., & Delouvée, S. (2021). Stand out of my sunlight: The mediating role of climate change conspiracy beliefs in the relationship between national collective narcissism and acceptance of climate science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 738–758.Google Scholar
Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2022). All you need is… a network: The rise of interpretive public administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 149–160.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., & Möller, I. (2019). Rich man’s solution? climate engineering discourses and the marginalization of the Global South. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(2), 151–167.Google Scholar
Billen, G., Garnier, J., & Barles, S. (2012). History of the urban environmental imprint: Introduction to a multidisciplinary approach to the long-term relationships between Western cities and their hinterland.Google Scholar
Binngiesser, J., Wilhelm, C., & Randler, C. (2013). Attitudes towards animals among German children and adolescents. Anthrozoös, 26, 325–339.Google Scholar
Birdsall, N. (1980). Population growth and poverty in the developing world. Population Bulletin, 35(5), 1–48.Google Scholar
Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 366–374.Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment. American Economic Review, 89(1), 335–339.Google Scholar
Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Geller, E. S., Lehman, P. K., & Postmes, T. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3, 413–416. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1767Google Scholar
Bolton, G., & Katok, E. (1995). An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economics Letters, 48(3–4), 287–92.Google Scholar
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (translated by R. Nice). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boy, J., Pandey, A. V., Emerson, J., Satterthwaite, M., Nov, O., & Bertini, E. (2017). Showing people behind data: Does anthropomorphizing visualizations elicit more empathy for human rights data? In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5462–5474).Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2002). Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 215(3), 287–296.Google Scholar
Bredicean, C., Tamasan, S. C., Lungeanu, D., Giurgi-Oncu, C., Stoica, I. P., Panfil, A. L., … & Patrascu, R. (2021). Burnout toll on empathy would mediate the missing professional support in the COVID-19 outbreak. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 14, 2231.Google Scholar
Broome, J. (2008). The ethics of climate change. Scientific American, 298(6), 96–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brüggemann, M., Elgesem, D., Bienzeisler, N., Gertz, H. D., & Walter, S. (2020). Mutual group polarization in the blogosphere: Tracking the hoax discourse on climate change. International Journal of Communication, 14, 24.Google Scholar
Brügger, A. (2020). Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: The limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives. Global Environmental Change, 60, 102023.Google Scholar
Brügger, A., Morton, T. A., & Dessai, S. (2016). “Proximising” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 125–142.Google Scholar
Brugnach, M., De Waard, S., Dubois, D., & Farolfi, S. (2021). Relational quality and uncertainty in common pool water management: An exploratory lab experiment. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. (2003). The narrative construction of reality. In Mateas, M., & Sengers, P. (Eds.), Narrative Intelligence (pp. 41–62). John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Buber, M. (1937). I and Thou, transl. by Ronald Gregor Smith, Edinburgh: T. and T. Scribners, New York. Originally published in.Google Scholar
Burt, C. D., & Strongman, K. (2005). Use of images in charity advertising: Improving donations and compliance rates. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 8(8), 571–580.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior 22, 345–423. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
CAF, Charities Aid Foundation (2021). CAF World Giving Index 2021, Charities Aid Foundation, London. www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-research/cafworldgivingindex2021_report_web2_100621.pdfGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209–219.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. K., Bush, C. P., Brunell, A. B., & Shelton, J. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1358–1368.Google Scholar
CČapek, S. M. (2010). Foregrounding nature: An invitation to think about shifting nature–city boundaries. City & Community, 9(2), 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capstick, S., Lorenzoni, I., Corner, A., & Whitmarsh, L. (2014). Prospects for radical emissions reduction through behavior and lifestyle change. Carbon Management, 5(4), 429–445.Google Scholar
Carlsson, L., & Sandström, A. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 33–54.Google Scholar
Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The basic empathy scale in adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679–691. doi:10.1037/a003229Google Scholar
Chan, A. A. H. (2012). Anthropomorphism as a conservation tool. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(7), 1889–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2018). Taking climate change here and now–mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance. Global Environmental Change, 53, 174–181.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. K., & Vincent, J. E. (1973a). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70, 666–677.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. K., & Vincent, J. E. (1973b). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9(6), 502–516.Google Scholar
Cochard, F., Le Gallo, J., Georgantzis, N., & Tisserand, J. C. (2021). Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90(February), 101613.Google Scholar
Cockburn, J., Rosenberg, E., Copteros, A., Cornelius, S. F. A., Libala, N., Metcalfe, L., & van der Waal, B. (2020). A relational approach to landscape stewardship: Towards a new perspective for multi-actor collaboration. Land, 9(7), 224.Google Scholar
Coleman, E. A., & Steed, B. C. (2009). Monitoring and sanctioning in the commons: An application to forestry. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2106–2113.Google Scholar
Constantino, S. M., & Weber, E. U. (2021). Decision-making under the deep uncertainty of climate change: The psychological and political agency of narratives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 151–159.Google Scholar
Cooke, G., & Muir, R. (Eds.), (2012). The Relational State: How Recognising the Importance of Human Relation-Ships Could Revolutionise the Role of the State. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Cox, M., Villamayor-Tomas, S., Ban, N. C., Epstein, G., Evans, L., Fleischman, F., … & Schoon, M. (2020). From concepts to comparisons: A resource for diagnosis and measurement in social-ecological systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 211–216.Google Scholar
Crona, B. I. (2006). Supporting and enhancing development of heterogeneous ecological knowledge among resource users in a Kenyan Seascape. Ecology & Society 11, 32.Google Scholar
Cunningham, R., Cvitanovic, C., Measham, T., Jacobs, B., Dowd, A. M., & Harman, B. (2016). Engaging communities in climate adaptation: The potential of social networks. Climate Policy, 16(7), 894–908.Google Scholar
Curran, B. J., Jenkins, M. A., & Tedeschi, P. (2019). Chapter 14: The global and cross-cultural reach of trauma-informed animal-assisted interventions. In Tedeschi, P., & Jenkins, M. A. (Eds.), Transforming Trauma: Resilience and Healing through Our Connections with Animals (pp. 423–462). Purdue University Press, Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
Curto-Millet, D., & Corsín Jiménez, A. (2022). The sustainability of open source commons. European Journal of Information Systems, 1–19. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2022.2046516.Google Scholar
Czap, N. V., Czap, H. J., Banerjee, S., & Burbach, M. E. (2019). Encouraging farmers’ participation in the conservation stewardship program: A field experiment. Ecological Economics, 161(July), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czap, N., Czap, H., Lynne, G., & Burbach, M. (2015). Walk in my shoes: Nudging for empathy conservation. Ecological Economics, 118, 147–158.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E. (1984). Alternative strategies for integrating economics and ecology. In Jansson, A.-M. (Ed.), Integration of Economy and Ecology: An Outlook for the Eighties (pp. 19–29). University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E., CobbJr, J. B., & Cobb, J. B. (1994). For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, The Environment, and a Sustainable Future (No. 73). Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Daly, H. (1993). Steady-state economics: A new paradigm. New Literary History 24(4), 811–816.Google Scholar
Darian, J. C., Tucci, L., Newman, C. M., & Naylor, L. (2015). An analysis of consumer motivations for purchasing fair trade coffee. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 318–327.Google Scholar
Davis, J. E. (Ed.), (2012). Stories of Change: Narrative and Social Movements. SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (2015). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In Schroeder, D. A., & Graziano, W. G. (Eds.), Oxford Library of Psychology (pp. 282–306). The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dawes, C. T., Loewen, P. J., & Fowler, J. H. (2011). Social preferences and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 845–856.Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: Cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(3), 187–197.Google Scholar
De Moor, T., & Tukker, A. (2015). Survival without sanctioning: The relationship between institutional resilience and methods of dealing with free-riding on early modern Dutch commons. Jahrbuch für Geschichte des ländlichen Raumes, 12(2015), 175–206.Google Scholar
De Moor, T., Farjam, M., Van Weeren, R., Bravo, G., Forsman, A., Ghorbani, A., & Dehkordi, M. A. E. (2021). Taking sanctioning seriously: The impact of sanctions on the resilience of historical commons in Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 181–188.Google Scholar
De Moor, T., Laborda-Pemán, M., Lana-Berasain, J. M., Van Weeren, R., & Winchester, A. (2016). Ruling the commons. Introducing a new methodology for the analysis of historical commons. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 529–588.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625Google Scholar
Decety, J. (2011). Neuroscience of empathic responding. In Stephanie, L., & Brown, R. (Eds.), Moving Beyond Self-Interest: Perspectives from Evolutionary Biology, Neuroscience, and the Social Sciences, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research, 1079(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Deer, L., Fire, J.,& Erdoes, R. (1972). Lame Deer, Seeker of Visions, Life of a Sioux Medicine Man. Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press, London.Google Scholar
DeWall, C. N., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Dierwechter, Y., & Taufen Wessells, A. (2013). The uneven localisation of climate action in metropolitan Seattle. Urban Studies, 50(7), 1368–1385.Google Scholar
Dietz, T. (2015). Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 1654–1655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423686112Google Scholar
Dietz, T., & Henry, A. D. (2008). Context and the commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(36), 13189–13190.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.Google Scholar
Dillahunt, T., Becker, G., Mankoff, J., & Kraut, R. (2008, May). Motivating environmentally sustainable behavior changes with a virtual polar bear. In Pervasive 2008 Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 8, pp. 58–62). Workshop held at the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, May 19th, 2008, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Dodge, J., Ospina, S. M., & Foldy, E. G. (2005). Integrating rigor and relevance in public administrationscholarship: The contribution of narrative inquiry. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 286–300.Google Scholar
Dodge, J., Saz-Carranza, A., & Ospina, S. M. (2019). Narrative inquiry in public network research. In Joris, V. J., Keast, R., & Koliba, C. (Eds.), Networks and Collaboration in the Public Sector (pp. 82–106). Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Dodman, D., Hayward, B., Pelling, M., Castan, B. V., Chow, W., Chu, E., … & Ziervogel, G. (2022). Chapter 6: Cities, settlements and key infrastructure. In Pörtner, H.-O. et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Domantay, J. (1953). The turtle fisheries in turtle islands. Bull. Fish. Soc. Philippines, 3–4, 3–27.Google Scholar
Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C., & Herpertz, S. C. (2007). Oxytocin improves ‘Mind-Reading’ in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61(6), 731–733.Google Scholar
Dr Dog (2021). AnimalsAsia webpage at www.animalsasia.org/hk-en/our-work/cat-and-dog-welfare/what-we-do/dr-dog.html. Accessed June 30, 2021.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2022). (Mis) estimating affective polarization. The Journal of Politics, 84(2), 1106–1117.Google Scholar
Dubois, G., Sovacool, B., Aall, C., Nilsson, M., Barbier, C., Herrmann, A., … & Sauerborn, R. (2019). It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 144–158.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1893). (1964). The Division of Labor in Society (G. Simpson, Trans.). Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (1998). Are women less selfish than men: Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal, May 1998a, 108(448), 726–735.Google Scholar
Eckerman, I. (2005). The Bhopal Saga–Causes and Consequences of the World’s Largest Industrial Disaster. Universities Press, Hyderabad, India. doi:10.13140/2.1.3457.5364. ISBN 978-81-7371-515-0.Google Scholar
Eklund, J., Andersson- Straberg, T., & Hansen, E. M. (2009). “I’ve also experienced loss and fear”: Effects of prior similar experience on empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 65–69.Google Scholar
Empatico (2019). Empatico 2018–2019 Evaluation Study. Working paper, unpublished manuscript at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GUh8FSgP25TWY2YJED4Kn5pNaiTPamQn/view?pli=1. Accessed June 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Ernstson, H., So¨ rlin, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2009). Social movements and ecosystem services- the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in stockholm. Ecology & Society, 13, 39.Google Scholar
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002). Appropriating the Commons: A Theoretical Explanation. In Ostrom, E., et al. (Eds.), The Drama of the Commons. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Federici, S. (2011). Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. www.bakonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/FEDERICI_Feminism-and-the-Politics-of-the-Commons_FORMER-WEST-2016.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). Chapter 8. The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism–experimental evidence and new theories. In Kolm, S-C., & Ythier, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity (pp. 615–691). North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Feinberg, A., Hooijschuur, E., Rogge, N., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. (2021). Sustaining collective action in urban community gardens. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 24(3), 3. doi: 10.18564/jasss.4506Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J., & Price, M. K. (2013). Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 64–73.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J., Miranda, J. J., & Price, M. K. (2011). The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: Evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment. American Economic Review, 101(3), 318–322. www.doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.318.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. (2014). “Slumming It.” In Blog: Made in America. Boston Review. http://bostonreview.net/blog/claude-fischer-made-america-alice-goffman-slum-ethnography. Accessed June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (2009). From dehumanization and objectification, to rehumanization: Neuroimaging studies on the building blocks of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 31.Google Scholar
Flood, M., Dresher, M., Tucker, A., & Device, F. (1950). Prisoner’s dilemma: Game theory. Experimental Economics (p. 54). Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Vintage, New York.Google Scholar
Friedman, D., & McAdam, D. (1992). Collective identities and activism: networks, choices, and the life of a social movement. In Morris, A. D., & Mueller, C. (Eds.), Frontiers of Social Movement Theory (pp. 156–173). Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (Eds.), (2014). Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fultz, J., Batson, C. D., Fortenbach, V. A., McCarthy, P. M., & Varney, L. L. (1986). Social evaluation and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 761–769.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (1995). The just world, charitable giving and attitudes to disability. Personal and Individual Differences, 19, 577–583.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Y. (2010). Beyond scripts and rules: Emotion, fantasy and care in contemporary service work. In Emotionalizing Organizations and Organizing Emotions (pp. 42–62). Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19(4), 378–384.Google Scholar
Garner, B. (2017). Communicating social support during crises at the farmers’ market: A social exchange approach to understanding customer?farmer communal relationships. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(4), 422–430.Google Scholar
Gatiso, T. T., Vollan, B., & Nuppenau, E. A. (2015). Resource scarcity and democratic elections in commons dilemmas: An experiment on forest use in Ethiopia. Ecological Economics, 114, 199–207.Google Scholar
Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., & Glenna, L. (2019). Spread the green word: A social community perspective into environmentally sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(5), 561–589.Google Scholar
Genevsky, A., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., & Knutson, B. (2013). Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: Affect shifts preferences for giving. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(43), 17188–17196.Google Scholar
Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2007). Collaboration and institutional endurance in US water policy. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(1), 55–60.Google Scholar
Gibson, C., Williams, J., & Ostrom, E. (2005). Local enforcement and better forests. World Development, 33(2), 273–284.Google Scholar
Giest, S., & Howlett, M. (2014). Understanding the pre-conditions of commons governance: The role of network management. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 37–47.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Gladwin, D. (2020) Digital storytelling going viral: using narrative empathy to promote environmental action. Media Practice and Education, 21(4), 275–288. DOI:10.1080/25741136.2020.1832827Google Scholar
González, E. R., Lejano, R. P., Vidales, G., Conner, R. F., Kidokoro, Y., Fazeli, B., & Cabrales, R. (2007). Participatory action research for environmental health: Encountering Freire in the urban barrio. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 77–100.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behaviour. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–78.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.Google Scholar
Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person× situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721Google Scholar
Grossman, P. J., & Eckel, C. C. (2015). Giving versus taking for a cause. Economics Letters, 132(July), 28–30.Google Scholar
Gu, X., Gao, Z., Wang, X., Liu, X., Knight, R. T., Hof, P. R., & Fan, J. (2012). Anterior insular cortex is necessary for empathetic pain perception. Brain, 135(9), 2726–2735.Google Scholar
Gubler, M., Brügger, A., & Eyer, M. (2019). Adolescents’ perceptions of the psychological distance to climate change, its relevance for building concern about it, and the potential for education. In Filho and Helmstock (Eds.), Climate Change and the Role of Education (pp. 129–147). Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Guilbeault, D., Becker, J., & Centola, D. (2018). Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), 9714–9719.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, N. L., Hilborn, R., & Defeo, O. (2011). Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470(7334), 386–389.Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Velez, V. H., & MacDicken, K. (2008). Quantifying the direct social and governmental costs of illegal logging in the Bolivian, Brazilian, and Peruvian Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics, 10(4), 248–256.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 2). Beacon Press, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Hafstead, M. (2019). Carbon Pricing 101. Online article (June 6, 2019; updated March 3, 2020) at www.rff.org/publications/explainers/carbon-pricing-101/. Accessed on June 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Hahn, E. R., & Garrett, M. K. (2017). Preschoolers’ moral judgments of environmental harm and the influence of perspective taking. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 11–19.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 98–113.Google Scholar
Hand, L. C. (2021). A virtuous hearer: An exploration of epistemic injustice and an ethic of care in public encounters. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(1), 117–133.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622–1625.Google Scholar
Harris, A. C., & Madden, G. J. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. The Psychological Record, 52, 429–440.Google Scholar
Harrod, H. L. (2000). The Animals Came Dancing: Native American Sacred Ecology and Animal Kinship. University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, N., & Koessler, A. K. (2021). Other-regarding preferences and pro-environmental behaviour: An interdisciplinary review of experimental studies. Ecological Economics, 184, 106987.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. P., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Fehr, E., Camerer, C., & Gintis, H. (Eds.), (2004). Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-scale Societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, B., Suárez, E., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Hess, S. (2012). The relationship between social and environmental interdependence as an explanation of proenvironmental behavior. Human Ecology Review, 19(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Hernández, D., Chang, D., Hutchinson, C., Hill, E., Almonte, A., Burns, R., … & Evans, D. (2018). Public housing on the periphery: Vulnerable residents and depleted resilience reserves post-hurricane sandy. Journal of Urban Health, 95(5), 703–715.Google Scholar
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2005). A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons: A chapter from Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice.Google Scholar
Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing 24(8), 723–742.Google Scholar
Hirsh, J. B., & Dolderman, D. (2007). Personality predictors of consumerism and environmentalism: A preliminary study. Personality and individual differences, 43(6), 1583–1593.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 653–660.Google Scholar
Hofmokl, J. (2010). The Internet commons: Towards an eclectic theoretical framework. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 226–250.Google Scholar
Hollstein, B. (2011). Qualitative Approaches. The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 404–416.Google Scholar
Homer-Dixon, T. F. (2010). Environment, scarcity, and violence. In Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorono. Seabury Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hourdequin, M. (2010). Climate, collective action and individual ethical obligations. Environmental Values, 19(4), 443–464.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2019). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2018). Thirty years of research on policy instruments. In Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
Ingram, M., Ingram, H., & Lejano, R. (2019). Environmental action in the Anthropocene: The power of narrative-networks. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 492–503.Google Scholar
IPCC (2022). Summary for policymakers. In Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Poloczanska, E. S., Mintenbeck, K., Tignor, M., Alegría, A., Craig, M., Langsdorf, S., Löschke, S., Möller, V., & Okem, A. (Eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
IPS, Innovate Public Schools (2019). SELA Rising, Fighting for Educational Justice for Latino Students in Southeast Los Angeles, Innovate Public Schools, Los Angeles at https://innovateschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/SELA-Rising-Final-Report-2019_English_compressed.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Jager, W., Janssen, M. A., De Vries, H. J. M., De Greef, J., & Vlek, C. A. J. (2000). Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and Homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model. Ecological Economics, 35(3), 357–379.Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Janssen, M. A., & Anderies, J. M. (2011). Governing the commons: Learning from field and laboratory experiments. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1569–1620.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. C., Baxter, L. C., Wilder, L. S., Pipe, J. G., Heiserman, J. E., & Prigatano, G. P. (2002). Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain, 125, 1808–1814.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. M., & Glasford, D. E. (2018). Intergroup contact and helping: How quality contact and empathy shape outgroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(8), 1185–1201.Google Scholar
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. (2017). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis, 37(2), 331–341. doi.org/10.1111/risa.12601.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Schkade, D., Sherman, S. J., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. In Elicitation of Preferences (pp. 203–242). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Kapembwa, J., & Wells, J. (2016). Climate justice for wildlife: A rights-based account. Intervention or protest: Acting for nonhuman animals, 359–390.Google Scholar
Keller, A., Marsh, J. E., Richardson, B. H., & Ball, L. J. (2022). A systematic review of the psychological distance of climate change: Towards the development of an evidence-based construct. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101822.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575.Google Scholar
Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2006). Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 379–401.Google Scholar
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(2): 135–158.Google Scholar
Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014). Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(6), 873–879.Google Scholar
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005). The “identified victim” effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 157–167.Google Scholar
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2011). Chapter 8. The identifiable victim effect: Causes and boundary conditions. In Oppenheimer, D. M., & Olivola, C. Y. (Eds.), The Science of Giving: Experimental Approaches to the Study of Charity (pp. 133–148). Psychology Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1974). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630–646.Google Scholar
Kohler-Evans, P., & Candice, D. B. (2015) “Compassion: How do you teach it?” Journal of Education and Practice, 6(11), 33–37. doi: 2222–288X.Google Scholar
Koliba, C., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Managing networks and complex adaptive systems. In Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (Eds.), Public Management and Governance (pp. 262–274). Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Koliba, C. J., Meek, J. W., Zia, A., & Mills, R. W. (2017). Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Kolleck, N., Well, M., Sperzel, S., & Jörgens, H. (2017). The power of social networks: How the UNFCCC secretariat creates momentum for climate education. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 106–126.Google Scholar
Krupp, D. B., DeBruine, L. M., & Barclay, P. (2008). A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 49–55.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. (2004). Victims of gas leak in Bhopal seek redress on compensation. British Medical Journal, 2004, 329. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7462.366-b (Published 12 August 2004).Google Scholar
Ladak, A., Wilks, M., & Anthis, J. R. (2021). Extending Perspective Taking to Non-Human Groups. Preprint www.sentienceinstitute.org/downloads/Perspective%20taking%20and%20nonhuman%20groups%20-%20preprint.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Laird-Benner, W., & Ingram, H. (2010). Sonoran desert network weavers: Surprising environmental successes on the US/Mexico Border. Environment, 53(1), 6–17.Google Scholar
Lame, D., John, F., & Erdoes, R. (1972). Lame Deer, Seeker of Visions, Life of a Sioux Medicine Man, Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42–58.Google Scholar
Lamm, C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2010). How do we empathize with someone who is not like us? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(2), 362–376.Google Scholar
Lamm, C., Nusbaum, H. C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2007). What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain. PLoS One, 2(12), e1292.Google Scholar
Lee, J. A., & Murnighan, J. K. (2001). The empathy-prospect model and the choice to help. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 816–839.Google Scholar
Lee, T., & Van de Meene, S. (2012). Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network. Policy Sciences, 45(3), 199–220.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1), 45–72.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A. (2019). 17. Building public and political will for climate change action. In A Better Planet (pp. 155–162). Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. (2006). Frameworks for Policy Analysis: Merging Text and Context. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. (2007). Peace Games: Theorizing about Transboundary Conservation. Peace Parks: Conservation and Conflict Resolution (pp. 41–54). MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. (2008). The phenomenon of collective action: Modeling institutions as structures of care. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 491–504.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. (2023). Economies with other-regarding actors: An exploration (in process).Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P., & Kan, W. S. (2022a). Relationality: The Inner Life of Public Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Open access book: www.cambridge.org/core/elements/relationality/609FF3DF88BCADAA726208EE3E6F536EGoogle Scholar
Lejano, R. P., & Kan, W. S. (2022b). IPCC and the City: The need to transition from ideology to climate justice. Journal of Planning Education and Research (online).Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P. (2006). Theorizing peace parks: Two models of collective action. Journal of Peace Research, 43(5), 563–581.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P. (2017). Assemblage and relationality in social-ecological systems. Dialogues in Human Geography, 7(2), 192–196.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P. (2019a). Relationality and social-ecological systems: Going beyond or behind sustainability and resilience. Sustainability, 11(10), 2760.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P. (2019b). Ideology and the narrative of climate skepticism. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(12), ES415-ES421.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P. (2021). Relationality: An alternative framework for analysing policy. Journal of Public Policy, 41(2), 360–383.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P., & Ingram, H. (2009). Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(6), 653–662.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P., & Ingram, H. (2012). Modeling the commons as a game with vector payoffs. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(1), 66–89.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P., & Nero, S. J. (2020). The Power of Narrative: Climate Skepticism and the Deconstruction of Science. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P., Araral, E., & Araral, D. (2014). Interrogating the commons: Introduction to the special issue. Reflecting on a legacy. Environmental Sciences and Policy, 36, 1–7.Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P., Ingram, H. M., Whiteley, J. M., Torres, D., & Agduma, S. J. (2007). The importance of context: Integrating resource conservation with local institutions. Society & Natural Resources, 20(2), 177–185.Google Scholar
Lejano, R., Chui, E., Lam, T., & Wong, J. (2018). Collective action as narrativity and praxis: Theory and application to Hong Kong’s urban protest movements. Public Policy and Administration, 33(3), 260–289.Google Scholar
Lejano, R., Guo, J., Lian, H., & Yin, B. (2018). A Phenomenology of Institutions: Relationality and Governance in China and Beyond. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Lejano, R., Ingram, M., & Ingram, H. (2013). The Power of Narrative in Environmental Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Lejano, R., Ingram, M., & Ingram, H. (2018). Narrative in the policy process. In Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing (pp. 309–326). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
Lejano, R., Kan, W., & Chau, C. (2020). “The hidden disequities of carbon trading: Carbon emissions, air toxics, and environmental justice,” Frontiers in Environmental Science (online) doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.593014.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1961). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (trans: Lingis, Alphonso).Google Scholar
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 21(2):153–174.Google Scholar
Lindeboom, W., Alam, N., Begum, D., & Streatfield, P. K. (2012). The association of meteorological factors and mortality in rural Bangladesh, 1983–2009. Global Health Action, 5:61–73.Google Scholar
Loreman, T. (2011). Kindness and empathy in pedagogy. In Love as Pedagogy (pp. 15–31). SensePublishers.Google Scholar
Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77:73–95.Google Scholar
Lu, H. (2021). Exposure to victim portrayals: The role of multiple emotions in influencing collective action intentions for environmental justice. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 11(4), 548–560.Google Scholar
Maiella, R., La Malva, P., Marchetti, D., Pomarico, E., Di Crosta, A., Palumbo, R., … & Verrocchio, M. C. (2020a). The psychological distance and climate change: A systematic review on the mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 2459.Google Scholar
Maiella, R., La Malva, P., Marchetti, D., Pomarico, E., Di Crosta, A., Palumbo, R., … & Verrocchio, M. C. (2020b). The psychological distance and climate change: A systematic review on the mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:568899Google Scholar
Majdandžic´, J., Amashaufer, S., Hummer, A., Windischberger, C., & Lamm, C. (2016). The selfless mind: How prefrontal involvement in mentalizing with similar and dissimilar others shapes empathy and prosocial behavior. Cognition, 157, 24–38.Google Scholar
Mandalaki, E., & Fotaki, M. (2020). The bodies of the commons: Towards a relational embodied ethics of the commons. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(4), 745–760.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2014). The role of the state in governing the commons. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 8–10.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J. (1990). On the relation of altruism and self-interest. In Mansbridge, J. J. (Ed.), Beyond Self-interest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J. (Ed.), (1990). Beyond Self-interest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Margaret, J., & King, M. J. (1996). The audience in the wilderness: The Disney nature films. Journal of Popular Film and Television 24.2, 60–68.Google Scholar
Markowitz, E. M., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Hodges, S. D. (2013). Compassion fade and the challenge of environmental conservation. Judgment and Decision making, 8(4), 397–406.Google Scholar
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(4): 503–15.Google Scholar
McClough, D., Ewing, R., & Schertzer, S. (2015). To pay or not to pay: An empirical examination of the effect of injunctive norms on charitable donations. The Journal of Economics and Politics, 22(1), 99–118.Google Scholar
McCreary, J. J., Marchant, G. J., & Davis, A. S. (April, 2018). The anatomy of empathy. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109–118.Google Scholar
McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Design principles for local and global commons. The International Political Economy and International Institutions, 2, 465–493.Google Scholar
McPherson, J. M. (1997). For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Meinshausen, M., Lewis, J., McGlade, C., Gütschow, J., Nicholls, Z., Burdon, R., … & Hackmann, B. (2022). Realization of Paris Agreement pledges may limit warming just below 2° C. Nature, 604(7905), 304–309.Google Scholar
Miele, M., Wilder, M., Ingram, M., Migrane, E., Schein, R., & Prytherch, D. (2015). The power of narrative in environmental networks (2013), by Lejano, R., Ingram, M., & Ingram, H. [Book Review]. AAG Annals Review of Books, 3(2), 99–108.Google Scholar
Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(2), 109–117.Google Scholar
Militz, T. A., & Foale, S. (2017). The “Nemo Effect”: Perception and reality of Finding Nemo’s impact on marine aquarium fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 18(3), 596–606.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859, 2002). On Liberty. published in 2002 by Dover Publications, Mineola, New York. Originally published in 1859 by J. W. Parker, London.Google Scholar
Miller, D. T. (1977). Personal deserving versus justice for others: An exploration of the justice motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13: 1–13.Google Scholar
Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (2016). Changing norms to change behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 339–361.Google Scholar
Miller, J. J., Cooley, M., Niu, C., Segress, M., Fletcher, J., Bowman, K., & Littrell, L. (2019). Support, information seeking, and homophily in a virtual support group for adoptive parents: Impact on perceived empathy. Children and Youth Services Review, 101, 151–156.Google Scholar
Miralles, A., Raymond, M., & Lecointre, G. (2019). Empathy and compassion toward other species decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Mirra, N. (2018). Educating for Empathy: Literacy Learning and Civic Engagement. Teachers College Press, New York.Google Scholar
Morell, M. F. (2014). 8 Governance of Online Creation Communities for the Building of Digital Commons: Viewed through the. Governing knowledge commons, 281.Google Scholar
Morrissey, L., & Boswell, J. (2023). Finding common ground. European Journal of Political Theory, 22(1), 141–160.Google Scholar
Mulgan, G. (2012). Government with the people: The outlines of a relational state. In Cooke, G., & Muir, R. (Eds.), The Relational State: How Recognising the Importance of Human Relationship could Revolutionise the Role of the State. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Mumford, L. (1961). The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects (Vol. 67). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.Google Scholar
Munson, S., Kotcher, J., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2021). The role of felt responsibility in climate change political participation. Oxford Open Climate Change, 1(1), kgab012.Google Scholar
Naegele, H. (2020). Where does the Fair Trade money go? How much consumers pay extra for Fair Trade coffee and how this value is split along the value chain. World Development, 133, 105006.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y., & Saijo, T. (2021). A visual narrative for taking future generations’ perspectives. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 983–1000.Google Scholar
Nash, J. (1950). Non-Cooperative Games. A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Princeton University in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Princeton University, Princeton.Google Scholar
Natarajan, U. (2021). Environmental justice in the Global South. In Atapattu, S. A., Gonzalez, C. G., & Seck, S. L. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2022). Evolutionary Perspectives on the Commons: A Model of Commonisation and Decommonisation. Sustainability, 14(7), 4300.Google Scholar
Nieto-Romero, M., Valente, S., Figueiredo, E., & Parra, C. (2019). Historical commons as sites of transformation. A critical research agenda to study human and more-than-human communities. Geoforum, 107, 113–123.Google Scholar
Nobis, N. (2009). The “Babe” vegetarians: Bioethics, animal minds and moral methodology. In Shapshay, S. (Ed.), Bioethics at the Movies (pp. 56–73). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
O’Connell, S. M. (1995). Empathy in chimpanzees: Evidence for theory of mind? Primates, 36(3), 397–410.Google Scholar
O’Dell, L. 2008. Representations of the “damaged” child: “child saving” in a British children’s charity ad campaign. Children and Society 22: 383–392. DOI:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00114.xGoogle Scholar
Ogunseitan, O. A. (2005). Topophilia and the quality of life. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(2), 143–148.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Ortiz-Riomalo, J. F., Koessler, A. K., & Engel, S. (2021). Inducing perspective-taking for prosocial behaviour in natural resource management. Available at SSRN 3773752.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1987). Institutional arrangements for resolving the commons dilemma: Some contending approaches. Conference paper. Conference:The Question of the Commons. The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, 46th National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration, Indianapolis, Indiana, March 23–27, 1985, 250–265.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000). Crowding out citizenship. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., & Janssen, M. A. (2004). Multi-level governance and resilience of social-ecological systems. In Globalisation, Poverty and Conflict (pp. 239–259). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., Agrawal, A., & Runge, C. F. (1995). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(3), 1393–1393.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., Walker, J. M., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H., 2006. Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(51), 19, 224–19, 331.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1999) “Polycentricity”. In McGinnis, M. (Ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (pp. 52–74). University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pagdee, A., Kim, Y.-S., & Daugherty, P. J., 2006. What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 19(1), 33–52.Google Scholar
Pahl, S., & Bauer, J. (2013). Overcoming the distance: Perspective taking with future humans improves environmental engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(2), 155–169.Google Scholar
Paul, E. S., & Serpell, J. A. (1996). Obtaining a new pet dog: Effects on middle childhood children and their families. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47, 17–29.Google Scholar
Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., Mahon, K., Russo, M., Ungar, A. K., & Burdick, K. E. (2015). Oxytocin and social cognition in affective and psychotic disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(2), 265–282.Google Scholar
Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., Mahon, K., Russo, M., Ungar, A. K., & Burdick, K. E. (2015). Oxytocin and social cognition in affective and psychotic disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(2), 265–282.Google Scholar
Peth, D., Mußhoff, O., Funke, K., & Hirschauer, N. (2018). Nudging farmers to comply with water protection rules-experimental evidence from Germany. Ecological Economics, 152, 310–321.Google Scholar
Pfattheicher, S., Sassenrath, C., & Schindler, S. (2016). Feelings for the suffering of others and the environment: Compassion fosters proenvironmental tendencies. Environment and Behavior, 48(7).Google Scholar
Pilny, A., Poole, M. S., Reichelmann, A., & Klein, B. (2017). A structurational group decision-making perspective on the commons dilemma: Results from an online public goods game. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(4), 413–428.Google Scholar
Polletta, F. (1998). Contending stories: Narrative in social movements. Qualitative Sociology 21(4), 419–446.Google Scholar
Polski, M. M., & Ostrom, E. (2017). An institutional framework for policy analysis and design. In Cole, D. H., & McGinnis, M. D. (Eds.), Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy: A Framework for Policy Analysis (Vol. 3). Lexington Books, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Powell Walter, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12(2), 295–336.Google Scholar
Preis, M. A., Kröner-Herwig, B., Schmidt-Samoa, C., Dechent, P., & Barke, A. (2015). Neural correlates of empathy with pain show habituation eects. An fMRI study. PLoS One, 10, e0137056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137056Google Scholar
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–72.Google Scholar
Preston, S. D., Liao, J. D., Toombs, T. P., Romero-Canyas, R., Speiser, J., & Seifert, C. M. (2021). A case study of a conservation flagship species: The monarch butterfly. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30(7), 2057–2077.Google Scholar
Prguda, E., & Neumann, D. L. (2014). Inter-human and animal-directed empathy: A test for evolutionary biases in empathetic responding. Behavioural processes, 108, 80–86.Google Scholar
Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2010). Effects of having pets at home on children’s attitudes toward popular and unpopular animals. Anthrozoös, 23(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). Effects of keeping animals as pets on children’s concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 431–449.Google Scholar
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57–83.Google Scholar
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.Google Scholar
Pulido, L. (2015). Geographies of race and ethnicity: White supremacy vs white privilege in environmental racism research. Progress in Human Geography, 39(6), 809–17.Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281–1302.Google Scholar
Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., & Verplanken, B. (2009). Think global, act local: The effect of goal and mindset specificity on willingness to donate to an environmental organization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 391e399.Google Scholar
Rapley, J. (2013). Understanding Development: Theory and Practice in the Third World. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1974). Prisoner’s dilemma – recollections and observations. In Game Theory as a Theory of a Conflict Resolution (pp. 17–34). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Reddy, S. (2018). “Plastic Pollution Affects Sea Life Throughout the Ocean,” Pew Charitable Trusts online report, at www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2018/09/24/plastic-pollution-affects-sea-life-throughout-the-ocean. Accessed September 17, 2021.Google Scholar
Reed, K. A., Wehner, M. F., & Zarzycki, C. M. (2022). Attribution of 2020 hurricane season extreme rainfall to human-induced climate change. Nature Communications, 13(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
Rees, W., & Wackernagel, M. (2008). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable – and why they are a key to sustainability. In Urban Ecology (pp. 537–555). Springer, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. TCU Press, Fort Worth.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1983). Time and Narrative (Vols. 1, 2, and 3). (trans. K. Blamey and D. Pellauer), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative (Vol. 3). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rilling, J. K., DeMarco, A. C., Hackett, P. D., Thompson, R., Ditzen, B., Patel, R. et al. (2012). Effects of intranasal oxytocin and vasopressin on cooperative behavior and associated brain activity in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 447–467. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.013Google Scholar
Rock, J., & Gilchrist, E. (2021). Creating empathy for the more-than-human under 2 degrees heating. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1–9.Google Scholar
Rode, J., G’omez-Baggethun, E., Krause, T. (2015). Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 117, 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.019.Google Scholar
Rogge, N., Theesfeld, I., & Strassner, C. (2018). Social sustainability through social interaction – a national survey on community gardens in Germany. Sustainability, 10(4), 1085.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F. W., & Fuenfschilling, L. (2020). Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change – and how “sustainability transition policy” can help. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8664–8668.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A. (1979). Equilibrium in supergames with the overtaking criterion. Journal of Economic Theory, 21(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Rumble, A. C., Van Lange, P. A., & Parks, C. D. (2010). The benefits of empathy: When empathy may sustain cooperation in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 856–866.Google Scholar
Sacchi, S., Riva, P., & Aceto, A. (2016). Myopic about climate change: Cognitive style, psychological distance, and environmentalism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.006Google Scholar
Sandström, A., & Rova, C. (2009). The network structure of adaptive governance-A single case study of a fish management area. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1).Google Scholar
Sandström, A., 2008. Policy Networks: The Relation Between Structure and Performance. Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Lulea? University of Technology, Lulea?, Sweden. Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta.Google Scholar
Sandström, E., Ekman, A. K., & Lindholm, K. J. (2017). Commoning in the periphery–The role of the commons for understanding rural continuities and change. International Journal of the Commons, 11(1):508–531.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S. (2002). Crimes of Bhopal and the global campaign for justice. Social Justice, 29(89), 47–52.Google Scholar
Sassenrath, C., Diefenbacher, S., Pfattheicher, S., & Keller, J. (2021). The potential and limitations of empathy in changing health-relevant affect, cognition and behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 1–34.Google Scholar
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2011). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511421196.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1968). The life you save may be your own. In Chase, S. (Ed.), Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis (pp. 127–162). Brookings Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2021). Trust in social relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 239–259.Google Scholar
Schlager, E. (1999). A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. Theories of the Policy Process, 1, 233–260.Google Scholar
Schlager, E., & Cox, M. (2018). The IAD framework and the SES framework: An introduction and assessment of the Ostrom workshop frameworks. In Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 215–252). Routledge.Google Scholar
Schlegel, S. A. (2003). Wisdom from a Rainforest: The Spiritual Journey of an Anthropologist. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. J., & Dowsley, M. (2010). Hunting with polar bears: Problems with the passive properties of the commons. Human Ecology, 38(3), 377–387.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D., & Edwardsen, M. (2003). Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 143–158.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Schuldt, J. P., Rickard, L. N., & Yang, Z. J. (2018). Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 147–153.Google Scholar
Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406.Google Scholar
Schumann, K., Zaki, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 475.Google Scholar
Schwan, S., Grajal, A., & Lewalter, D. (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 70–85.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1970). Normative explanations of helping behavior: a critique, proposal, and empirical test. In Macaulay, J., & Berkowitz, L. (Eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Scott, K. E., & Graham, J. A. (2015). Service-learning: Implications for empathy and community engagement in elementary school children. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(4), 354–372.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 317–344.Google Scholar
Severson, A. W., & Coleman, E. A. (2015). Moral frames and climate change policy attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1277–1290.Google Scholar
Sevillano, V., Aragonés, J. I., & Schultz, P. W. (2007). Perspective taking, environmental concern, and the moderating role of dispositional empathy. Environment and Behavior, 39(5), 685–705.Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617–627.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I., Richardson, S., McClurg, S., & Sokhey, A. (2020). Discussion networks in political decision making. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.Google Scholar
Sheeder, R. J., & Lynne, G. D. (2011). Empathy-conditioned conservation: “Walking in the shoes of others” as a conservation farmer. Land Economics, 87(3), 433–452.Google Scholar
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. D. et al. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466–469.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P., & Swanson, M. (2017). How issue frames shape beliefs about the importance of climate change policy across ideological and partisan groups. PLoS One, 12(7), e0181401.Google Scholar
Small, D, Verrochi, N. 2009. The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research XLVI (December), 777–787.Google Scholar
Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J., Verissimo, D., Isaac, N. J. B., Jones, K. E. (2012). Identifying Cinderella species: Uncovering mammals with conservation fagship appeal. Conservation Letters, 5, 205–212.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1999). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior (No. 218). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Sojka, J. R. Z. (1986). Understanding Donor Behavior: A Classification Paradigm. ACR North American Advances.Google Scholar
Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656–667.Google Scholar
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change: Psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957–972. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.xGoogle Scholar
Spies, M., & Alff, H. (2020). Assemblages and complex adaptive systems: A conceptual crossroads for integrative research? Geography Compass, 14(10), e12534.Google Scholar
Stanley, S., Millin, P., Mickleson, K., & Milfont, T. L. (2018). Not here, not to us, maybe not at all: The psychological distance of climate change in relation to environmental engagement [Preprint]. PsyArXiv.Google Scholar
Stein, E. (1964). On the Problem of Empathy. W. Stein (trans.), Springer-Science+Business Media, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Stern, N., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S. et al. (2006). Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, HM Treasury, London.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Altruism among kin vs. nonkin: Effects of cost of help and reciprocal exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), 193–198.Google Scholar
Stocks, E. L., Lishner, D. A., & Decker, S. K. (2009). Altruism or psychological escape: Why does empathy promote prosocial behavior? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 649–665.Google Scholar
Stokols, D. (2018). Social Ecology in the Digital Age: Solving Complex Problems in a Globalized World. Academic Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Stokols, D. (2020). Toward an environmental psychology of planetary recovery and biospheric survival. Umweltpsychologie-German Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 12–33.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (2000). Caring by the book. In Harrington-Meyer, M. (Ed.), Care Work: Gender, Labor, and Welfare States (pp. 89–111). Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2021). Competing ontologies: A redux primer for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(6), 422–435.Google Scholar
Susskind, L. (2006). Arguing, bargaining, and getting agreement. The Oxford handbook of public policy, 269–295.Google Scholar
Susskind, L. E., & Cruikshank, J. L. (2006). Breaking Roberts Rules: The New Way to Run Your Meeting, Build Consensus, and Get Results. Oxford University Press., New York.Google Scholar
Susskind, L., & Kim, A. (2022). Building local capacity to adapt to climate change. Climate Policy, 22(5), 593–606.Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2015). Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 446–468.Google Scholar
Sze, J. (2020). Environmental Justice in a Moment of Danger (Vol. 11). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. M. (2007) Buffalo hunt: international trade and the virtual extinction of the North American bison. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. www.nber.org/papers/w12969 Accessed 28 August 2010.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.Google Scholar
Teodoro, J. D., Prell, C., & Sun, L. (2021). Quantifying stakeholder learning in climate change adaptation across multiple relational and participatory networks. Journal of Environmental Management, 278, 111508.Google Scholar
Thatchenkery, T. J. (1992). “Organizations as ‘Texts’: Hermeneutics as a model for understanding organizational change.” Research in Organizational Change and Development 6:197–233.Google Scholar
Thornton, B., Kirchner, G., & Jacobs, J. (1991). Influence of a photograph on a charitable appeal: A picture may be worth a thousand words when it has to speak for itself. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(6), 433–445.Google Scholar
Thushari, G. G. N., & Senevirathna, J. D. M. (2020). Plastic pollution in the marine environment. Heliyon, 6(8), e04709.Google Scholar
Tindall, D. B., & Piggot, G. (2015). Influence of social ties to environmentalists on public climate change perceptions. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 546–549.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (2017). There is an alternative: Homines curans and the limits of neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring, 1(1), 27–43.Google Scholar
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117, 440–463. doi: 10.1037/a0018963Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. F. (1990). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56–66.Google Scholar
UNEP, United Nations Environmental Program (2021). Emissions Gap Report 2021: The Heat is On – A World of Climate Promises Not Yet Delivered. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Upright, R. L. (2002). To tell a tale: The use of moral dilemmas to increase empathy in the elementary school child. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(1), 15–20.Google Scholar
Vale, M. T., Stanley, J. T., Houston, M. L., Villalba, A. A., & Turner, J. R. (2020). Ageism and behavior change during a health pandemic: A preregistered study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3156.Google Scholar
van Klingeren, F., & de Graaf, N. D. (2021). Heterogeneity, trust and common-pool resource management. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 11(1), 37–64.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A., & Huckelba, A. L. (2021). Psychological distance: How to make climate change less abstract and closer to the self. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 49–53.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A., De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). Self-interest and beyond: Basic principles of social interaction.Google Scholar
Villamayor-Tomas, S., Thiel, A., Amblard, L., Zikos, D., & Blanco, E. (2019). Diagnosing the role of the state for local collective action: Types of action situations and policy instruments. Environmental Science & Policy, 97, 44–57.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1987). Zone of proximal development. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, 5291, 157.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society In Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (Eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Walch, C. (2018). Typhoon Haiyan: Pushing the limits of resilience? The effect of land inequality on resilience and disaster risk reduction policies in the Philippines. Critical Asian Studies, 50(1), 122–135.Google Scholar
Walker, G. B., Daniels, S. E., & Emborg, J. (2022). Insights and opportunities in public participation practice: Applying collaborative learning in environmental policy decision situations. In Hansen, A., & Cox, R. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication (pp. 157–180). Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Walsh, Z., Böhme, J., & Wamsler, C. (2021). Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education. Ambio, 50(1), 74–84.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Hurlstone, M. J., Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Lawrence, C. (2019). Climate change from a distance: An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230Google Scholar
Warner, K. (2020). Climate Justice: Who bears the burden and pays the price? Social Alternatives, 39(2), 19–25.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1920). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Scribner’s, New York, 1920.Google Scholar
Wei, L., & Liu, B. (2020). Reactions to others’ misfortune on social media: Effects of homophily and publicness on schadenfreude, empathy, and perceived deservingness. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 1–13.Google Scholar
West, S., Haider, L. J., Stålhammar, S., & Woroniecki, S. (2020). A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 304–325.Google Scholar
Whatmore, S. (1997). Dissecting the autonomous self: Hybrid cartographies for a relational ethics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(1), 37–53.Google Scholar
Whitley, C. T., Kalof, L., & Flach, T. (2020). Using animal portraiture to activate emotional affect. Environment and Behavior, 0013916520928429.Google Scholar
Whitley, D. (2008). The Idea of Nature in Disney Animation. Ashgate Publishing Limited, England.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, M. O., & Bekkers, R. (2010). Helping behavior, dispositional empathic concern, and the principle of care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(1), 11–32.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Van Vugt, M., & O’Gorman, R. (2008). Multilevel selection theory and major evolutionary transitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 6–9.Google Scholar
Winerman, L. (2019). Mourning the land. Monitor on Psychology, 50(5), 24. www.apa.org/monitor/2019/05/mourning-landGoogle Scholar
Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Witt, J. (2016). Engaging the empathic imagination to explore environmental justice. In Learner-centered Teaching Activities for Environmental and Sustainability Studies (pp. 221–226). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
Wong-Parodi, G., & Feygina, I. (2020). Understanding and countering the motivated roots of climate change denial. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 60–64.Google Scholar
Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 1641–1658.Google Scholar
Young, A., Khalil, K. A., & Wharton, J. (2018). Empathy for animals: A review of the existing literature. Curator: The Museum Journal, 61(2), 327–343.Google Scholar
Yu, R. (2014). Evaluation study on animals Asia’s Dr Dog programme animal assisted therapy for senior citizens with dementia, cared for in non government subvented institutions in Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zagefka, H., & James, T. (2015). The psychology of charitable donations to disaster victims and beyond. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 155–192.Google Scholar
Zak, P. J., Stanton, A. A., & Ahmadi, S. (2007). Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. PLoS One, 2(11), e1128.Google Scholar
Zarzycka, M. (2016). Save the child: Photographed faces and affective transactions in NGO child sponsoring programs. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 23(1), 28–42.Google Scholar