Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:42:02.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Impact of LLETZ on subsequent pregnancies

from SECTION 3 - Gynaecological Cancers and Precancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Affiliation:
Ioannina University Hospital
Maria Kyrgiou
Affiliation:
West Middlesex University
Sean Kehoe
Affiliation:
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Eric Jauniaux
Affiliation:
University College Hospital, London
Pierre Martin-Hirsch
Affiliation:
Royal Preston Hospital
Philip Savage
Affiliation:
Charing Cross Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Background

During the past few decades, the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and microinvasive cervical cancer (FIGO stage IA1) in younger women has increased in Western countries. In many women, diagnosis and treatment of CIN occur before the completion or even the beginning of their family.

Well-organised cervical screening with appropriate treatment of screen-detected intraepithelial lesions can reduce cervical cancer incidence by up to 80%. The introduction of systematic call and recall screening programmes in the UK over the past 20 years has resulted in a profound decrease in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer as preinvasive lesions can be detected by the screening programme and treated appropriately.

There are several methods for the treatment of the cervical precancer. Cold knife conisation (CKC) is known to be associated with adverse fertility- and pregnancy-related effects. It also has the disadvantage of requiring general anaesthesia and hospitalisation. For this reason, in the 1970s and 1980s outpatient ablative methods of treatment (electrocoagulation, cryotherapy, laser ablation) replaced cone biopsy for the great majority of cases. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) (also known as loop electrosurgical excision procedure [LEEP] in the USA) was introduced in the late 1980s and has now become the most popular method of treatment for CIN, largely as a result of its simplicity, its efficiency as an outpatient or ‘office’ technique, and the facility to comprehensively examine histologically the excised transformation zone.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×