The Americas: Languages

doi:10.1017/CHO9781139017831.084

2.36 - The Americas: Languages

from VI. - The Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014

Paul Heggarty and

Colin Renfrew

Edited by

Colin Renfrew and

Paul Bahn

Show author details

Paul Heggarty: Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Colin Renfrew: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Colin Renfrew: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Overview

To survey the language prehistory of the entire Americas is a daunting task. For in several fundamental respects, as we shall explore in this opening section, the linguistic panorama here is strikingly distinct from that of the Old World. Moreover, within the scope of this chapter fall not one but two of humanity’s major hearths of “civilisation”, Mesoamerica and the Central Andes; and just as they were essentially independent of each other, so too were the prehistories of their languages. The conquistadors met only the final incarnations of these indigenous cultural trajectories, of course, and soon shattered both. What does live on, however, is the native speech of both Moctezuma and Atahualpa – now as modern Nahuatl and Quechua respectively, to this day among the most widely spoken native languages of the Americas. Moreover, just as the Aztecs and Incas were but the tip of the iceberg, of long and fluctuating trajectories that archaeologists trace back millennia into the past, their languages likewise are just two players among a host of native tongues, rich testimony to the prehistories of the populations that spoke them. Moreover, this complementary level of data on our past – language – can be read just as fully across much of the Americas, irrespective of the presence or absence of complex societies and rich, monumental material culture records.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge World Prehistory , pp. 1326 - 1354

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781139017831.084 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adelaar, W. F. H. 1989. Review of Greenberg (1987): Language in the Americas. Lingua 78: 249–55.Google Scholar

Adelaar, W. F. H. 1991. The endangered languages problem: South America, pp. 45–91 in (Robins, R. H. & Uhlenbeck, E. M., eds.) Endangered Languages. Berg: Oxford.

Adelaar, W. F. H. 2012. Cajamarca Quechua and the expansion of the Huari state, pp. 197–217 in (Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G., eds.) Archaeology and Language in the Andes. Proceedings of the British Academy, 173. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Adelaar, W. F. H. with Muysken, P. C. 2004. Languages of the Andes. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 1999a. The Arawak language family, pp. 65–106 in (Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y., eds.) The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 1999b. Areal diffusion and language contact in the Içana-Vaupés Basin, north-west Amazonia, pp. 385–416 in (Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y., eds.) The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. 1999. Other small families and isolates, pp. 341–84 in (Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y., eds.) The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

D’Altroy, T. N. 2003. The Incas. Wiley-Blackwell: New York.

Bellwood, P. 2005. First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies. Blackwell: Oxford.

Benz, B. F. & Long, A. 2000. Prehistoric maize evolution in the Tehuacán Valley. Current Anthropology 41 (3): 460–5.Google Scholar

Beresford-Jones, D. G. & Heggarty, P. 2012. Broadening our horizons: a new methodology and cross-disciplinary hypothesis for Andean prehistory, pp. 57–84 in (Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G., eds.) Archaeology and Language in the Andes. Proceedings of the British Academy, 173. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Bird, R. M., Browman, D. L. & Durbin, M. E. 1984. Quechua and maize: mirrors of Central Andean culture history. Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society 15 (1–2): 187–240.Google Scholar

Blench, R. & Spriggs, M. (eds.) 1999. Archaeology and Language IV: Language Change and Cultural Transformation. Routledge: London.

Browman, D. L. 1994. Titicaca Basin archaeolinguistics: Uru, Pukina and Aymara ad 750–1450. World Archaeology 26 (2): 235–51.Google Scholar

Burger, R. L. 2012. Central Andean language expansion and the Chavín sphere of interaction, pp. 135–61 in (Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G., eds.) Archaeology and Language in the Andes. Proceedings of the British Academy, 173. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Campbell, L. 1997. American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford University Press: New York.

Campbell, L. & Kaufman, T. 1976. A linguistic look at the Olmecs. American Antiquity 41 (1): 80–9.Google Scholar

Campbell, L., Kaufman, T. & Smith-Stark, T. C. 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62 (3): 530–70.Google Scholar

Campbell, L. & Poser, W. J. 2008. Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Cerrón-Palomino, R. 1993. Quechuística y aimarística: una propuesta terminológica. Alma Mater 5: 41–55.Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, R. 1999. Tras las huellas del aimara cuzqueño. Revista Andina 33: 137–61.Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, R. 2000a. El origen centroandino del aimara, pp. 131–42 in (Kaulicke, P. & Isbell, W., eds.) Boletín de Arqueología PUCP (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú). Fondo Editorial de la PUCP: Lima.

Cerrón-Palomino, R. 2000b. Lingüística aimara. Centro Bartolomé de las Casas: Cuzco.

Cerrón-Palomino, R. 2003. Lingüística quechua. 2nd ed. Centro Bartolomé de las Casas: Cuzco.

Cerrón-Palomino, R. 2008. Quechumara: estructuras paralelas del quechua y del aimara. 2nd ed. Plural: La Paz.

Cerrón-Palomino, R. 2012. Unravelling the enigma of the “particular language” of the Incas, pp. 265–94 in (Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G., eds.) Archaeology and Language in the Andes. Proceedings of the British Academy, 173. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Constenla Umaña, A. 1990. Una hipótesis sobre la localización del protochibcha y la dispersión de sus descendientes. Filología y Lingüística 16 (2): 111–23 San José: Universidad de Costa Rica.Google Scholar

Dahlin, B. H., Quizar, R. & Dahlin, A. 1987. Linguistic divergence and the collapse of Preclassic civilization in southern Mesoamerica. American Antiquity 52 (2): 367–82.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1906 (reprinted 1983). The Voyage of the “Beagle”. Dent: London.

Denevan, W. M. 2002. Cultivated Landscapes of Native Amazonia and the Andes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Derbyshire, D. C. 1979. Hixkaryana. North-Holland: Amsterdam.

Derbyshire, D. C. & Pullum, G. K. 1986. Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.

Diamond, J. M. 1997. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. Norton: New York.

Diamond, J. M. & Bellwood, P. 2003. Farmers and their languages: The first expansions. Science 300 (5619): 597–603.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y. 1999. The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Durbin, M. E. 1985. A survey of the Carib language family, pp. 325–70 in (Klein, H. E. M. & Stark, L. R., eds.) South American Indian Languages: Retrospect and Prospect. University of Texas Press: Austin.

Everett, D. L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46 (4): 621–46.Google Scholar

Everett, D. L. 2009. Pirahã culture and grammar: a response to some criticisms. Language 85 (2): 405–42.Google Scholar

Flannery, K. V. 1972. The origins of the village as a settlement type in Mesoamerica and the Near East: a comparative study, pp. 23–54 in (Ucko, P. J., Tringham, R. & Dimbleby, G. W., eds.) Man, Settlement and Urbanism. Duckworth: London.

Fortescue, M. 1986. What dialect distribution can tell us of dialect formation in Greenland. Arctic Anthropology 23 (1–2): 413–22.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 1998. Language Relations across the Bering Strait: Reappraising the Archaeological and Linguistic Evidence. Continuum: London.

Fowler, C. S. 1983. Some lexical clues to Uto-Aztecan prehistory. International Journal of American Linguistics 49 (3): 224–57.Google Scholar

Goddard, I. 1994. The West-to-East cline in Algonquian dialectology, pp. 187–211 in (Cowan, W., ed.) Actes du vingt-cinquième congrès des algonquinistes. Carleton University: Ottawa.

Goddard, I. & Campbell, L. 1994. The history and classification of American Indian languages: what are the implications for the peopling of the Americas?, pp. 189–207 in (Bonnichsen, R. & Steele, D. G., eds.) Method and Theory for Investigating the Peopling of the Americas. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Oregon State University: Corvallis.

Granberry, J. & Vescelius, G. S. 2004. Languages of the Pre-Columbian Antilles. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa.

Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426 (6965): 435–9.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.

Greenberg, J. H., Turner, C. G. & Zegura, S. L. 1986. The settlement of the Americas: A comparison of the linguistic, dental, and genetic evidence. Current Anthropology 27 (5): 477–97.Google Scholar

Heggarty, P. 2005. Enigmas en el origen de las lenguas andinas: aplicando nuevas técnicas a las incógnitas por resolver. Revista Andina 40: 9–57.Google Scholar

Heggarty, P. 2007. Linguistics for archaeologists: principles, methods and the case of the Incas. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17 (3): 311–40.Google Scholar

Heggarty, P. 2008. Linguistics for archaeologists: a case-study in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18 (1): 35–56.Google Scholar

Heggarty, P. 2010. Beyond lexicostatistics: how to get more out of “word list” comparisons. Diachronica 27 (2): 301–24.Google Scholar

Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G. 2010. Agriculture and language dispersals: Limitations, refinements, and an Andean exception? Current Anthropology 51 (2): 163–91.Google Scholar

Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G. (eds.) 2012. Archaeology and Language in the Andes. Proceedings of the British Academy, 173. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Hill, J. H. 2001. Proto-Uto-Aztecan: A community of cultivators in central Mexico? American Anthropologist 103 (4): 913–34.Google Scholar

Hill, J. H. 2002. Proto-Uto-Aztecan cultivation and the northern devolution, pp. 331–40 in (Bellwood, P. & Renfrew, C., eds.) Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.

Howard, R. 2011 The Quechua languages in the Andes today: between statistics, the state, and daily life, pp. 189–213 in (Heggarty, P. & Pearce, A., eds.) History and Linguistics in the Andes. Palgrave Macmillan: London.

Jensen, C. 1999. Tupí-Guaraní, pp. 125–63 in (Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y., eds.) The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Justeson, J. S. & Kaufman, T. 1997. A newly discovered column in the hieroglyphic text on La Mojarra Stela 1: a test of the Epi-Olmec decipherment. Science 277 (5323): 207.Google Scholar

Kari, J. & Potter, B. A. (eds.) 2010. The Dene-Yeniseian Connection. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Department of Anthropology: Fairbanks.

Kaufman, T. 1976. Archaeological and linguistic correlations in Mayaland and associated areas of Meso-America. World Archaeology 8 (1): 101.Google Scholar

Kaufman, T. 1994. The native languages of South America, pp. 46–76 in (Mosley, C. J. & Asher, R. E., eds.) Atlas of the World’s Languages. Routledge: London.

Kaufman, T. & Golla, V. 2000. Language groupings in the New World: their reliability and usability in cross-disciplinary studies, pp. 47–57 in (Renfrew, C., ed.) America Past, America Present: Genes and Languages in the Americas and Beyond. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.

Kaufman, T. & Justeson, J. 2009. Historical linguistics and Pre-Columbian Mesoamerica. Ancient Mesoamerica 20 (2): 221–31.Google Scholar

Kolata, A. L. 1993. The Tiwanaku: Portrait of an Andean Civilization. Blackwell: Cambridge, MA.

Kroeber, P. D. 1999. The Salish Language Family: Reconstructing Syntax. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln.

Lewis, M. P. (ed.) 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 16th ed. SIL International: Dallas. Available at .

Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F. & Fennig, C. D. (eds.) 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 17th ed. Dallas: SIL International. Available at .

Merrill, W. L., Hard, R. J., Mabry, J. B., Fritz, G. J., Adams, K. R., Roney, J. R. & MacWilliams, A. C. 2009. The diffusion of maize to the southwestern United States and its impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (50): 21,019–26.Google Scholar

Migliazza, E. C. 1982. Linguistic prehistory and the refuge model in Amazonia, pp. 497–519 in (Prance, G. T., ed.) Biological Diversification in the Tropics. Columbia University Press: New York.

Migliazza, E. C. & Campbell, L. 1988. Panorama general de las lenguas indígenas en América. Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia: Caracas.

Mithun, M. 1981. Stalking the Susquehannocks. International Journal of American Linguistics 47 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar

Nettle, D. 1999. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D. & Rodrigues, C. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: a reassessment. Language 85 (2): 355–404.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. 1990. Linguistic diversity and the first settlement of the New World. Language 66: 475–521.Google Scholar

Payne, D. L. (ed.) 1990. Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languages. University of Texas Press: Austin.

Pearsall, D. 2008. Plant domestication and the shift to agriculture in the Andes, pp. 105–20 in (Silverman, H. & Isbell, W. H., eds.) Handbook of South American Archaeology. Springer: New York.

Pope, K. O., Pohl, M. E. D., Jones, J. G., Lentz, D. L., Nagy, C. von, Vega, F. J. & Quitmyer, I. R. 2001. Origin and environmental setting of ancient agriculture in the lowlands of Mesoamerica. Science 292 (5520): 1370–3.Google Scholar

Rankin, R. L. 2006. Siouan tribal contacts and dispersions evidenced in the terminology for maize and other cultigens, pp. 563–77 in (Staller, J. E., Tykot, R. H. & Benz, B. F., eds.) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Prehistory, Linguistics, Biogeography, Domestication, and Evolution of Maize. Academic Press: Burlington.

Renfrew, C. (ed.) 2000. America Past, America Present: Genes and Languages in the Americas and Beyond. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.

Rensch, C. R. 1976. Comparative Otomanguean Phonology. Indiana University Press: Bloomington.

Robinson, A. 2008. Lost Languages: The Enigma of the World’s Undeciphered Scripts. Tess Press: New York.

Rodrigues, A. D. 1999a. Macro-Jê, pp. 165–206 in (Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y., eds.) The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Rodrigues, A. D. 1999b. Tupí, pp. 107–24 in (Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y., eds.) The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Sapir, E. 1916. Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture: A Study in Method. Government Printing Bureau: Ottawa. Available at .

Sorensen, A. P. 1967. Multilingualism in the northwest Amazon. American Anthropologist 69 (6): 670–84.Google Scholar

Stanish, C. 2003. Ancient Titicaca: The Evolution of Complex Society in Southern Peru and Northern Bolivia. University of California Press: Berkeley.

Starostin, S. A. 1991. On the hypothesis of a genetic connection between the Sino-Tibetan languages and the Yeniseian and North-Caucasian languages, pp. 12–41 in (Shevoroshkin, V. V., ed.) Nostratic, Dene-Caucasian, Austric and Amerind: Materials from the First International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Language and Prehistory, Ann Arbor, 8–12 November, 1988. Brockmeyer: Bochum.

Torero, A. 1972. Lingüística e historia de la sociedad andina, pp. 51–106 in (Escobar, A., ed.) El Reto del Multilingüismo en el Perú. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos: Lima.

Torero, A. 1984. El comercio lejano y la difusión del quechua. Revista Andina 4: 367–89.Google Scholar

Torero, A. 2002. Idiomas de los Andes: Lingüística e Historia. Editorial Horizonte/Institut Français des Études Andines: Lima.

Urton, G. 2012 The herder-cultivator relationship as a paradigm for archaeological origins, linguistic dispersals and the evolution of record keeping in the Andes, pp. 321–43 in (Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G., eds.) Archaeology and Language in the Andes. Proceedings of the British Academy, 173. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Villalón, M. E. 1991. A spatial model of lexical relationships among fourteen Cariban varieties, pp. 54–96 in (Key, M. R., ed.) Language Change in South American Indian Languages. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia.

Walker, R. S. & Ribeiro, L. A. 2011. Bayesian phylogeography of the Arawak expansion in lowland South America. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278 (1718): 2562–7.

Wichmann, S., Beliaev, D. & Davletshin, A. 2008. Posibles correlaciones lingüísticas y arqueológicas vinculadas con los olmecas, pp. 667–83 in (Uriarte, M. T. & González Lauck, R. B., eds.) Olmeca: Balance y Perspectivas. Memoria de la Primera Mesa Redonda. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Mexico City.

Wise, M. R. 1999. Small language families and isolates in Peru, pp. 307–40 in (Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y., eds.) The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Wohlgemuth, J. 2010. Language endangerment, community size and typological rarity, pp. 255–77 in (Wohlgemuth, J. & Cysouw, M., eds.) Rethinking Universals: How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.