Book contents
- The Cambridge World HistoryVOLUME VI
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- Part One Global matrices
- Part Two Macro-regions
- Part Three Large-scale political formations
- 11 The Iberian empires, 1400 to 1800
- 12 Imperial competition in Eurasia: Russia and China
- 13 The Islamic empires of the early modern world
- Part Four Crossroads regions
- Part Five Overview
- Index
- References
12 - Imperial competition in Eurasia: Russia and China
from Part Three - Large-scale political formations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Book contents
- The Cambridge World HistoryVOLUME VI
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- Part One Global matrices
- Part Two Macro-regions
- Part Three Large-scale political formations
- 11 The Iberian empires, 1400 to 1800
- 12 Imperial competition in Eurasia: Russia and China
- 13 The Islamic empires of the early modern world
- Part Four Crossroads regions
- Part Five Overview
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter examines the competition between the imperial Chinese and imperial Russian empires in a world-historical context, and traces how the rules of that game were gradually established over the course of the early modern period. It also explores how each of these empires positioned itself vis-a-vis the rest of the early modern world more generally from about 1600 until the late eighteenth century. The chapter discusses the growth of Qing power which included Taiwan and other territories, and the Russian empire, which was based in Muscovy. Knowledge of new territories and the management of peoples of a variety of ethnicities were central to the growth and maintenance of both the Qing and Russian Empires during this period of intense mutual imperial expansion. One of ways in which the Russian and Qing Empires both competed to build legitimacy and create lasting legacies was through the patronage of arts and the creation of a distinctive literature.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge World History , pp. 297 - 322Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Further reading
Breyfogle, Nicholas, Schrader, Abby and Sunderland, Willard (eds.), Peopling the Russian Periphery: Borderland Colonization in Eurasian History (New York: Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbank, Jane and Cooper, Frederick (eds.), Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Crossley, Pamela Kyle, “Manzhou Yuanliu Kao and the Formalization of the Manchu Heritage,” Journal of Asian Studies 46 (1987), 761–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Pamela Kyle, A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Deal, David M. and Hostetler, Laura, The Art of Ethnography: A Chinese “Miao Album” (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dmytryshyn, Basil, Crownhart-Vaughan, E. A. P. and Vaughan, Thomas (eds.), Russia's Conquest of Siberia 1558–1700: A Documentary Record (Portland, OR: Oregon Historical Society, 1985), vol. i.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Joseph, “Sino-Russian Relation, 1800–62” in Fairbank, John King (ed.), The Cambridge History of China (Cambridge University Press, 1978), vol. x, pt 1.Google Scholar
Glebov, Sergey, “Siberian Middle Ground: Languages of Rule and Accommodation of the Siberian Frontier” in Ilya Gerasimov, Jan Kusber and Semyonov, Alexander (eds.), Empire Speaks Out Languages of Rationalization and Self-Description in the Russian Empire (Leiden: Brill, 2009), pp. 121–51.Google Scholar
Grumbach, Lutz, Heklau, Heike and Nikol, Thomas, Terra incognita Sibirien: die Anfänge der wissenschaftlichen Erforschung Sibiriens unter Mitwirkung deutscher Wissenschaftler im 18. Jahrhundert; eine Ausstellung der Frankeschen Stiftungen zu Halle in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Archiv der Russischen Akademie der Wissenschaften St. Petersburg (Halle: Verl. der Franckeschen Stiftungen, 1999).Google Scholar
Hempel, Friedrich and Geißler, Christian Gottfried Heinrich, Abbildung und Beschreibung Der Völkerstämme und Völker Unter Des Russischen Kaisers Alexander Menschenfreundlichen Regierung. Oder Charakter Dieser Völker Aus Der Lage und Beschaffenheit Ihrer Wohnplätze Entwickelt und in Ihren Sitten, Gebräuchen und Beschäftigungen Nach Den Angegebenen Werken Der in-und Ausländischen Litteratur (Leipzig: Industrie-Comptoir, 1803).Google Scholar
Hostetler, Laura, “Contending Cartographic Claims? The Qing Empire in Manchu, Chinese, and European Maps” in Akerman, James R. (ed.), The Imperial Map: Cartography and the Mastery of Empire (University of Chicago Press, 2009), pp. 92–132.Google Scholar
Hostetler, Laura, “Early Modern Mapping at the Qing Court: Survey Maps from the Kangxi, Yongzheng, and Qianlong Reign Periods” in Du, Yongtao and Kyong-McClain, Jeff (eds.), Chinese History in Geographical Perspective (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Hostetler, Laura, Qing Colonial Enterprise: Ethnography and Cartography in Early Modern China (University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hughes, Lindsey, Russia in the Age of Peter the Great (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kao, Ting Tsz, The Chinese Frontiers (Palatine, IL: Chinese Scholarly Publishing Company, 1980).Google Scholar
Khodarkovsky, Michael, Russia's Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800 (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Khodarkovsky, Michael, Where Two Worlds Met: The Russian State and the Kalmyk Nomads, 1600–1771 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kivelson, Valerie A., Cartographies of Tsardom: The Land and Its Meanings in Seventeenth-Century Russia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Mancall, Mark, Russia and China: Their Diplomatic Relations to 1728 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Millward, James A., “Qing Inner Asian Empire and the Return of the Torghuts” in Millward, James A., Dunnell, Ruth W., Elliott, Mark C. and Forêt, Philippe (eds.), New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengdu (New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004), pp. 91–105.Google Scholar
Perdue, Peter C., “Boundaries, Maps, and Movement: Chinese, Russian, and Mongolian Empires in Early Modern Central Eurasia,” International History Review 20 (1998), 263–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdue, Peter C., China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quested, R. K. I., Sino-Russian Relations: A Short History (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1984).Google Scholar
Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, David, Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Denis J. B., “Mapmaking, Science, and State Building in Russia before Peter the Great,” Journal of Historical Geography 31 (2005), 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, Willard, “Imperial Space: Territorial Thought and Practice in the Eighteenth Century” in Jane Burbank, Mark Von Hagen and Remnev, Anatolyi (eds.), Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700–1930 (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2008), pp. 33–66.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Willard, Taming the Wild Field: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Tulišen, , Narrative of the Chinese Embassy to the Khan of the Tourgouth Tartars, in the Years 1712, 13, 14, & 15 (Arlington, VA: University Publications of America, 1976).Google Scholar
Waley-Cohen, Joanna, Exile in Mid-Qing China: Banishment to Xinjiang, 1758–1820 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, Cynthia Hyla, Russia Engages the World, 1453–1825 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by