Tonality

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521623711.025

23 - Tonality

from D - Tonality

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Brian Hyer

Edited by

Thomas Christensen

Show author details

Thomas Christensen: Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Book contents

Get access

Summary

As a music-theoretical term, “tonality” was first used by Alexander Choron in 1810 to describe the arrangement of the dominant and subdominant above and below the tonic and thus to differentiate the harmonic organization of modern music (tonalité moderne) from that of earlier music (tonalité antique). One of the main conceptual categories in Western musical thought, tonality most often refers to the orientation of melodies and harmonies toward a referential (or tonic) pitch class. In the broadest possible sense, however, it refers to systematic arrangements of pitch phenomena and relations between them.

Usage

A number of musical and discursive factors have contributed to a veritable profusion of definitions for the term. To begin with, there has been considerable indecision about what musical domain the term covers: whether it applies to both Western and non-Western music, or whether, within Western musical traditions, the term can be restricted to the harmonic organization of music from the so-called common practice (1600–1910) or includes all music that evinces a basic difference between consonance and dissonance. There have also been some basic theoretical disagreements about whether its constituent musical elements are melodies or harmonies: however narrow the definition given to the term, the domain of tonal music is so enormous, diverse, and complex that one can choose almost any combination of musical phenomena and theoretical principles as the basis for discussion. In addition to these musical problems, enormous discursive difficulties have arisen from the conceptual languages used to describe tonal phenomena, theoretical vocabularies that vary dramatically according to the aesthetic and epistemological commitments of the writer.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory , pp. 726 - 752

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521623711.025 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T.Versuch über Wagner (1938), Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1952Google Scholar

Albrechtsberger, J. G.Gründliche Anweisung zur Composition, Leipzig, Breitkopf, 1790Google Scholar

Arlin, M. as Esquisse de l’histoire de l’harmonie: An English-Language Translation of the François-Joseph Fétis History of Harmony, Stuyvesant, NY, Pendragon Press, 1994Google Scholar

Bailey, R. “The Structure of the Ring and Its Evolution,” 19th-Century Music 1 (1977)CrossRef Google Scholar

Besseler, H. “Tonalharmonik und Vollklang,” Acta 24 (1952)Google Scholar

Carter, R. as Theory of Harmony, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978Google Scholar

Choron, A. as Méthode élémentaire de composition, 2 vols., Paris, Courcier, 1814Google Scholar

Choron, A. E. “Sommaire de l’Histoire de la Musique,” in Dictionnaire historique des Musiciens, ed. Choron, and Fayolle, F. J., Paris, Valade and Lenormant, 1810; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1971Google Scholar

Cowell, H. “New Terms for New Music,” Modern Music 5/2 (1928)Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, C.Untersuchungen über die Entstehung der harmonischen Tonalität, Kassel, Bärenreiter, 1968Google Scholar

D’Alembert, J.Elemens de musique, théorique et pratique, suivant les principes de M. Rameau, Paris, David l’aîné, Le Breton, and Durand, 1752; facs. New York, Broude, 1966; Ger. trans.Google Scholar

Drabkin, W. as “On Organicism in Sonata Form,” in The Masterwork in Music, vol. II, Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar

Ellis, A. J. as On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, 2nd edn., London, Longman and Green, 1885; reprint New York, Dover, 1954Google Scholar

Marpurg, F. as Systematische Einleitung in die musikalische Setzkunst nach den Lehrsätzen des Herrn Rameau, Leipzig, Breitkopf, 1757; facs. Leipzig, Zentralantiquariat der DDR, 1980Google Scholar

Fétis, F. J.Esquisse de l’histoire de l’harmonie, Paris, Bourgogne and Martinet, 1840Google Scholar

Fétis, F. J.Histoire générale de la musique depuis les temps les plus anciens jusqu’à nos jours, 4 vols., Paris, Didot Frères, 1869–76Google Scholar

Fétis, F. J.Traité complet de la théorie et de la pratique de l’harmonie, Paris, Schlesinger, 1844; 11th edn., Paris, Brandus, 1875Google Scholar

Geslin, P.Cours d’harmonie, Paris, Geslin, 1826Google Scholar

Gjerdingen, R. as Studies on the Origin of Harmonic Tonality, Princeton University Press, 1990Google Scholar

Hauptmann, M.Die Natur der Harmonik und der Metrik, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1853Google Scholar

Heathcote, W. as The Nature of Harmony and Metre, London, S. Sonnenschein, 1888Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H.Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologischer Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik (1863), 4th edn., Braunschweig, F. Vieweg, 1877Google Scholar

Hostinský, O.Die Lehre von den musikalischen Klängen: Ein Beitrag zur aesthetischen Begründung der Harmonie-Lehre, Prague, H. Dominicus, 1879Google Scholar

Jelensperger, D.L’harmonie au commencement du 19me siècle, Paris, Zetter, 1830Google Scholar

Kurth, E.Romantische Harmonik und ihre Krise in Wagners “Tristan” (1919), 3rd edn., Berlin, M. Hesse, 1923; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1968 and 1998Google Scholar

Livingstone, R. as In Search of Wagner, London, Verso, 1981Google Scholar

Momigny, J.-J. “Musique,” in Encyclopédie méthodique de Musique, ed. Framery, N. E., Ginguené, P. L., and Momigny, , Paris, Agasse, 1818; reprint New York, Da Capo Press, 1971Google Scholar

Momigny, J.-J.Cours complet d’harmonie et de composition après une théorie neuve et générale, 3 vols., Paris, Bailleul, 1806Google Scholar

Norton, R.Tonality in Western Culture: A Critical and Historical Perspective, University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1984Google Scholar

Perle, G.Twelve-Tone Tonality, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1977Google Scholar

Powers, H. S. “Is Mode Real? Pietro Aron, the Octenary System, and Polyphony,” Basler Jahrbuch 16 (1992)Google Scholar

Rameau, , in his Vorgemach (1745).

Rameau, J. P.Génération harmonique, Paris, Prault fils, 1737Google Scholar

Riemann, H. “Ideen zu einer ‘Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,’” Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters 21 (1914)Google Scholar

Riepel, J.Grundregeln zur Tonordnung insgemein, vol. II of Anfangsgründe zur musikalischen Setzkunst, Frankfurt, Wagner, 1755; facs. Vienna, Böhlau, 1996Google Scholar

Said, E. W.Orientalism, New York, Pantheon, 1978Google Scholar

Sainsbury, J. as “Summary of the History of Music,” in Dictionary of Musicians from the Earliest Ages to the Present Time, London, Sainsbury, 1825; facs. New York, Da Capo Press, 1966Google Scholar

Schellhous, R. “Fétis’s Tonality as a Metaphysical Principle: Hypothesis for a New Science,” Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 1979– 13 (1991)Google Scholar

Schenker, H. “Vom Organischen der Sonatenform,” in Das Meisterwerk in der Musik, vol. II, Munich, Drei Masken, 1926Google Scholar

Schenker, H.Harmonielehre, Stuttgart, Cotta, 1906; reprint Vienna, Universal, 1978; abridged trans. Mann Borgese, E. M., ed. Jonas, O. as Harmony, University of Chicago Press, 1954Google Scholar

Schoenberg, A.Harmonielehre (1911), 3rd edn., Vienna, Universal, 1922Google Scholar

Schoenberg, A.Structural Functions of Harmony (1954), rev. edn. Stein, L., New York, Norton, 1968Google Scholar

Subotnik, R. R. “Tonality, Autonomy, and Competence in Post-Classical Music,” Critical Inquiry 6 (1979)CrossRef Google Scholar

“Tonal Harmony and Full Sonority,” in Counterpoint and Compositional Process in the Time of Dufay, ed. Moll, K., New York, Garland, 1997Google Scholar

Tovey, D. F. “Musical Form and Matter” (1934), in The Mainstream of Music, London, Oxford University Press, 1949Google Scholar

Warner, J. as The Theory of Musical Composition, London, R. Cocks, 1851Google Scholar

Wason, R. and West Marvin, E. as “Riemann’s ‘Ideen zu einer Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen’: An Annotated Translation,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 36 (1992)Google Scholar

Weber, G.Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst (1817–21), 3rd edn., 4 vols., Mainz, B. Schott, 1830–32Google Scholar

Book contents

23 - Tonality

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive