Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:27:44.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Organum – discantuscontrapunctus in the Middle Ages

from B - Compositional Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Thomas Christensen
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

“Anyone who aspires to understand contrapunctus should write down the following matters.” So begins a short manual on counterpoint from the early fourteenth century that circulated widely under the authority of Jehan des Murs but is best identified (anonymously) by its incipit “Quilibet affectans.” The theorist’s remarks are straightforward indeed. Contrapunctus observes a strictly note-against-note texture. Only select intervals – some perfect in nature (unisons, fifths, octaves), others imperfect (minor third, major third, and major sixth) – are admitted between the voices, as are their octave compounds. The natural sequel to any authorized interval is that interval from the opposite category closest in size: minor third (imperfect) after unison (perfect); octave (perfect) after major sixth (imperfect). Although characterized as “natural,” these contiguous progressions are by no means mandatory. The motion of the cantus, the pre-existent melody to which another line is joined in counterpoint, may well prompt other intervallic successions. Within the latitude this affords, no perfect interval may be reiterated in direct succession, but any imperfect interval may be followed by another, or by several, of the same kind. Aside from such parallels, the two voices ought usually to proceed in contrary directions, so that when the cantus ascends, the new line descends, and vice versa. All contrapunctus must begin and end with perfect consonance.

The compact array of precepts set forth in “Quilibet affectans” hardly seems to qualify as theory. It reads as a set of rudimentary guidelines for production of correct note-against-note polyphony in two parts. Yet the opening declaration that the path to understanding contrapunctus is to write these rules (rather than, say, to sing or to compose model progressions or phrases) does appear to claim some theoretical status for what follows (as does one stray reference to Boethius).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, IV, ed. Reckow, F. as Der Musiktraktat des Anonymous 4, 2 vols., Steiner, Wiesbaden F., 1967
Anonymous, IV, trans. Yudkin, J. as The Music Treatise of Anonymous IV: A New Translation, Musicological Studies and Documents, ed. Carapetyan, A., American Institute of Musicology, Neuhausen-Stuttgart, Hänssler, 195741 (1985)Google Scholar
,Anonymous of St. Emmeram, De Musica Mensurata; trans. and ed. Yudkin, J. as De Musica Mensurata: The Anonymous of St. Emmeram, Complete Critical Edition, Translation, and Commentary, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Arlt, W.Stylistic Layers in Eleventh-Century Polyphony: How Can the Continental Sources Contribute to our Understanding of the Winchester Organa?,” in Music in the Medieval English Liturgy, ed. Rankin, S. and Hiley, D., Oxford, Clarendon, 1993Google Scholar
Bent, M.Resfacta and Cantare Super Librum,” Journal of the American Musicological Society, University of Chicago Press, et al., 194836 (1983)Google Scholar
Blackburn, B. J.On Compositional Process in the Fifteenth Century,” Journal of the American Musicological Society, University of Chicago Press, et al., 194840 (1987)Google Scholar
Boen, J.Johannes Boens Musica und seine Konsonanzenlehre, ed. Frobenius, W., Stuttgart, Musikwissenschaftliche Verlags-Gesellschaft mbH, 1971Google Scholar
Boethius, A. M. S.De institutione musica, ed. Friedlein, G. as Anicii Manlii Torquati Severini Boetii De institutione arithmetica libri duo, De institutione musica libri quinque, accedit Geometria quae fertur Boetii, Leipzig, Teubner, 1867; reprint Frankfurt-am-Main, Minerva, 1966Google Scholar
Boethius, A. M. S.De institutione musica, trans. Bower, C., ed. Palisca, C. as Fundamentals of Music, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar
Bukofzer, M.Geschichte des englischen Diskants und des Fauxbourdons nach den theoretischen Quellen, Leipzig, Heitz, 1936Google Scholar
Eggebrecht, H. and Zaminer, F., eds., Ad Organum Faciendum: Lehrschriften der Mehrstimmigkeit in nachguidonischer Zeit, Mainz, B. Schotts Söhne, 1970Google Scholar
,Franco of Cologne, Ars cantus mensurabilis, ed. Reaney, G. and Gilles, A. as Franconis de Colonia Ars Cantus Mensurabilis, Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, Rome, American Institute of Musicology, 195018 (1974)Google Scholar
,Franco of Cologne, Ars cantus mensurabilis, trans. Strunk, O. in Source Readings in Music History, ed. Strunk, Oliver; rev. edn., ed. Leo Treitler, New York, Norton, 1998Google Scholar
Fuller, S.Discant and the Theory of Fifthing,” Acta Musicologica, International Musicological Socety, Basel, Bärenreiter et al., 192850 (1978)Google Scholar
Fuller, S.Early Polyphony,” in The New Oxford History of Music, vol. II, ed. Crocker, R. L. and Hiley, D., Oxford University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Fuller, S.On Sonority in Fourteenth-Century Polyphony,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195730 (1986)Google Scholar
Fuller, S.Theoretical Foundations of Early Organum Theory,” Acta Musicologica, International Musicological Socety, Basel, Bärenreiter et al., 192853 (1981)Google Scholar
Godt, I. and Rivera, B., “The Vatican Organum Treatise – A Colour Reproduction, Transcription, and Translation,” in Gordon Athol Anderson (1929–1981) In Memoriam, Basel Institute of Medieval Music, 1984Google Scholar
,Guido of Arezzo, Micrologus, ed. Waesberghe, J. Smits as Guidonis Aretini Micrologus, Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, Rome, American Institute of Musicology, 19504 (1955)Google Scholar
,Guido of Arezzo, Micrologus, trans. Babb, W., ed. Palisca, C. in Hucbald, Guido, and John On Music: Three Medieval Treatises, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1978Google Scholar
Guilielmus, monachus, De Preceptis Artis Musicae, ed. Seay, A., Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, Rome, American Institute of Musicology, 195011 (1965)Google Scholar
Haas, M.Die Musiklehre im 13. Jahrhundert von Johannes de Garlandia bis Franco,” in Die Mittelalterliche Lehre von der Mehrstimmigkeit, Geschichte der Musiktheorie, 10 of 15 vols. to date, ed. Zaminer, F., Staatliches Institut fr Musikforschung Preussischer Kulturbesitz Berlin, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgessellschaft, 19845 (1984)Google Scholar
Hothby, J., De arte contrapuncti, ed. Reaney, G., Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, Rome, American Institute of Musicology, 195026 (1977)Google Scholar
Jacques, Liège, Speculum musicae, ed. Bragard, R., 7 vols., Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, Rome, American Institute of Musicology, 19503 (1955–73)Google Scholar
Jerome, Moravia, Tractatus de musica, ed. Cserba, S. M. O.P. in Hieronymus de Moravia O.P. Tractatus de Musica, Pustet, Regensburg F., 1935Google Scholar
Jerome, Moravia, Tractatus de musica, trans. Knapp, J. in Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 19576 (1962)Google Scholar
John, Garland, De mensurabili musica, trans. Birnbaum, S. as Johannes de Garlandia Concerning Measured Music, Colorado Springs, Colorado College Music Press, 1978Google Scholar
John, Garland, De mensurabili musica, ed. Reimer, E., Steiner, Wiesbaden F., 1972Google Scholar
Marchetto, Padua, Lucidarium in arte Musicae planae, trans. and ed. Herlinger, J. as The Lucidarium of Marchetto of Padua: A Critical Edition, Translation, and Commentary, University of Chicago Press, 1985Google Scholar
Meech, S. B.Three Musical Treatises in English from a Fifteenth-Century Manuscript,” Speculum 10 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musica Enchiriadis, Scolica Enchiriadis, ed. Schmid, H. as Musica et Scolica Enchiriadis una cum aliquibus tractatulis adiunctis, Munich, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1981Google Scholar
Musica Enchiriadis, Scolica Enchiriadis, trans. Erickson, R., ed. Palisca, C. as “Musica enchiriadis” and “Scolica enchiriadis”: Translated, with Introduction and Notes, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Petrus dictus palma ociosa, Compendium de discantu mensurabili, ed. Wolf, J. in “Ein Beitrag zur Diskantlehre des 14. Jahrhunderts,” Sammelbände der Internationalem Musikgesellschaft 15 (1913–14)Google Scholar
Pinegar, S.On Rhythmic Modes,” Theoria 8 (1994)Google Scholar
Prosdocimo, Beldomandi, Contrapunctus (1942), ed. and trans. Herlinger, J., Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1984Google Scholar
“Quaedam de arte discantandi,” ed. Coussemaker, C. E. H. in Histoire de L’Harmonie au Moyen Age, Paris, V. Didron, 1852; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1966Google Scholar
Quatuor Tractatuli Italici de Contrapuncto, ed. Seay, A., Colorado Springs, Colorado College Music Press, 1977Google Scholar
Rankin, S.Winchester Polyphony: The Early Theory and Practice of Organum,” in Music in the Medieval English Liturgy, ed. Rankin, S. and Hiley, D., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993Google Scholar
Reckow, F.Guido’s Theory of Organum after Guido: Transmission–Adaptation–Transformation,” in Essays on Medieval Music in Honor of David G. Hughes, ed. Boone, G. M., Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Geschichte der Musiktheorie im IX.–XIX. Jahrhundert, reprint of 2nd edn., Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1921; trans. of Riemann, , Books I and II, by Haggh, R. as History of Music Theory, New York, Da Capo, 1966, reprint 1974Google Scholar
Sachs, K.-J.Arten improvisierter Mehrstimmigkeit nach Lehrtexten des 14. bis 16. Jahrhunderts,” Basler Jahrbuch für Historische Musikpraxis 7 (1983)Google Scholar
Sachs, K.-J.Die Contrapunctus-Lehre im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert,” Die Mittelalterliche Lehre von der Mehrstimmigkeit, Geschichte der Musiktheorie, 10 of 15 vols. to date, ed. Zaminer, F., Staatliches Institut fr Musikforschung Preussischer Kulturbesitz Berlin, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgessellschaft, 19845 (1984)Google Scholar
Sachs, K.-J.Zur Tradition der Klangschritt-Lehre: Die Texte mit der Formel ‘Si cantus ascendit…’ und ihre Verwandten,” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, Bückeburg, Fürstliches Institut für Musikwissenschaftliche Forschung, 1918–27; Trossingen, Hohner-Stiftung, 1952–61; Wiesbaden, F. Steiner, 196228 (1971)Google Scholar
Sachs, K.-J.Der Contrapunctus im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert: Untersuchungen zum Terminus, zur Lehre und zu den Quellen, Wiesbaden, F. Steiner, 1974Google Scholar
Seay, A. as The Art of Counterpoint, Musicological Studies and Documents, ed. Carapetyan, A., American Institute of Musicology, Neuhausen-Stuttgart, Hänssler, 19575 (1961)Google Scholar
Scattolin, P. P.La Regola del ‘Grado’ nella Teoria Medievale del Contrappunto,” Rivista Italiana di Musicologia 14 (1979)Google Scholar
Seay, A., ed., “An Anonymous Treatise from St. Martial,” Annales Musicologiques 5 (1976)Google Scholar
Tinctoris, J.Liber de arte contrapuncti (1477), ed. Seay, A., Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, Rome, American Institute of Musicology, 195022/2 (1975)Google Scholar
Torkewitz, D.Zur Entstehung der Musica und Scolica Enchiriadis,” Acta Musicologica, International Musicological Socety, Basel, Bärenreiter et al., 192869 (1997)Google Scholar
Treitler, L.Dervatikanische Organum-traktat und das Organum von Notre Dame de Paris: Perspektiven der Entwicklung einer schriftlichen Musikkultur in Europa,” Basler Jahrbuch für historische Musikpraxis 7 (1983)Google Scholar
Trowell, B.Faburden – New Sources, New Evidence: a Preliminary Survey,” in Modern Musical Scholarship, ed. Olleson, E., Boston, Oriel Press, 1980Google Scholar
Trowell, B.Faburden and Fauxbourdon,” Musica Disciplina 13 (1959)Google Scholar
Trumble, E.Fauxbourdon: An Historical Survey, Brooklyn, Institute of Medieval Music, 1959Google Scholar
Ugolino, Orvieto, Declaratio Musicae Disciplinae, ed. Seay, A., 3 vols., Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, Rome, American Institute of Musicology, 19507 (1959–62)Google Scholar
Wegman, R.From Maker to Composer: Improvisation and Musical Authorship in the Low Countries, 1450–1500,” Journal of the American Musicological Society, University of Chicago Press, et al., 194849 (1996)Google Scholar
Whitcomb, P.Teachers, Booksellers and Taxes: Reinvestigating the Life and Activities of Johannes de Garlandia,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 8 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaminer, F.Der Vatikanische Organum-Traktat (Ottob. lat. 3025): Organum-Praxis der frühen Notre Dame-Schule und ihrer Vorstufen, Tutzing, H. Schneider, 1959Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×