Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:20:11.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Nineteenth-century harmonic theory: the Austro-German legacy

from D - Tonality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
David Bernstein
Edited by
Thomas Christensen
Thomas Christensen
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Today most scholars agree that Rameau was the founder of modern harmonic theory. As we have seen in the previous chapter, Rameau attempted to synthesize in his many writings a multiplicity of ideas – both old and new, speculative and practical – into a unified theory of tonal harmony grounded upon a single underlying principle, the corps sonore (see Chapter 24, pp. 759–71). If he did not succeed in creating a truly systematic and stable theory of harmony owing to his many differing and often contradictory theoretical arguments and intellectual borrowings, he nonetheless bequeathed to the nineteenth century a number of compelling and richly suggestive ideas that would inspire theorists in their own efforts.

In this chapter, we will look at the evolution of harmonic theory in the nineteenth century. This is of course a vast and complex topic. Given the profound changes in harmonic language between 1800 and 1900 – a period covering the end of Viennese Classicism and closing with Schoenberg’s first tentative steps beyond the tonal system – it is not surprising that theorists expended extraordinary energy and efforts in their attempts to rationalize this shifting practice. As it is impossible here to describe all of these efforts in detail, we will limit our scope to the development of Austro-German harmonic theory, a tradition which arguably encompasses some of the most innovative and influential writings on this topic for the entire century. Within this tradition, three individual trajectories can be traced back by differing routes to Rameau’s own theory: scale-degree (Stufen) theory, fundamental-bass theory, and function theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory , pp. 778 - 811
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arend, M. “Harmonische Analyse des Tristanvorspiels,” Bayreuther Blätter 24 (1901)Google Scholar
Baron, C. K. “At the Cutting Edge: Three American Theorists at the End of the Nineteenth Century,” International Journal of Musicology, 2 (1993)Google Scholar
Beach, D. and Thym, J. as The Art of Strict Musical Composition, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1982Google Scholar
Bent, I. as “A Particularly Remarkable Passage in a String Quartet in C by Mozart, k. 465 (‘Dissonance’),” in Music Analysis in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols., ed. Bent, I. (vol. I: Fugue, Form and Style, vol. II: Hermeneutic Approaches), Cambridge University Press, 1994, vol. IGoogle Scholar
Bent, I. as “The Harmonic Style of Richard Wagner, Elucidated with Respect to the Leitmotifs of ‘Tristan and Isolde,’” in Music Analysis in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols., ed. Bent, I. (vol. I: Fugue, Form and Style, vol. II: Hermeneutic Approaches), Cambridge University Press, 1994 vol. I (1994)Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. W. “Georg Capellen on Tristan und Isolde: Analytical Systems in Conflict at the Turn of the Twentieth Century,” Theoria 4 (1989)Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. W. “Georg Capellen’s Theory of Reduction,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 37 (1993)Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. W. “Schoenberg Contra Riemann: Stufen, Regions, Verwandschaft, and the Theory of Tonal Function,” Theoria 6 (1992)Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. W. “Symmetry and Symmetrical Inversion in Turn-of-the-Century Theory and Practice,” in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past, ed. Hatch, C. and Bernstein, D. W., University of Chicago Press, 1993Google Scholar
Bewerung, H. as Harmony Simplified, London, Augener, 1896Google Scholar
Bruckner, A.Vorlesungen über Harmonie und Kontrapunkt an der Universität Wien, ed. Schwanzara, E., Vienna, Österreichischer Bundesverlag für Unterricht, Wissenschaft, und Kunst, 1950Google Scholar
Burnham, S. “Method and Motivation in Hugo Riemann’s History of Harmonic Theory,” Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 1979– 14 (1992)Google Scholar
Capellen, G. “Die Unmöglichkeit und Überflussigkeit der dualistischen Molltheorie Riemanns,” Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 97 (1901)Google Scholar
Capellen, G. “Harmonik und Melodik bei Richard Wagner,” Bayreuther Blätter 25 (1902)Google Scholar
Capellen, G.Ist das System S. Sechters ein geeigneter Ausgangspunkt für die theoretische Wagnerforschung?, Leipzig, C. F. Kahnt, 1902Google Scholar
Capellen, G.Die Zukunft der Musiktheorie (Dualismus oder “Monismus”?) und ihre Einwirkung auf die Praxis, Leipzig, C. F. Kahnt, 1905Google Scholar
Capellen, G.Ein neuer exotischer Musikstil an Notenbeispielen nachgewiesen, Stuttgart, C. Grüninger, 1906Google Scholar
Carter, R. as Theory of Harmony, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978Google Scholar
Christensen, T. “The Rule of the Octave in Thorough-Bass Theory and Practice,” Acta Musicologica, International Musicological Socety, Basel, Bärenreiter et al., 1928– 64 (1992)Google Scholar
Christensen, T. “The Schichtenlehre of Hugo Riemann,” In Theory Only 6 (1982)Google Scholar
Christensen, T.Rameau and Musical Thought in the Enlightenment, Cambridge University Press, 1993Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, C. “Schoenberg and Schenker,” in Schoenberg and the New Music: Essays by Carl Dahlhaus, trans. Puffett, D. and Clayton, A., Cambridge University Press, 1987Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, C.Untersuchungen über die Entstehung der harmonischen Tonalität, Kassel, Bärenreiter, 1968Google Scholar
D’Alembert, J. “Réflexions sur la théorie de la musique” (1777), in Œuvres et Correspondances inédites de d’Alembert, Geneva, Slatkine, 1967Google Scholar
Dineen, P. “Schoenberg’s Concept of Neutralization,” Theoria 2 (1987)Google Scholar
Dunsby, J. “Schoenberg and the Writings of Heinrich Schenker,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute, 2/1 (1977)Google Scholar
Ellis, A. J. as On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, 2nd edn., London, Longmans and Green, 1885; reprint New York, Dover, 1954Google Scholar
Erpf, H.Studien zur Harmonie und Klangtechnik der neueren Musik, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1927Google Scholar
Federhofer, H.Akkord und Stimmführung in den musiktheoretischen Systemen von Hugo Riemann, Ernst Kurth und Heinrich Schenker, Vienna, Österreichische Akadamie der Wissenschaften, 1981Google Scholar
Filmore, J. C. as “The Nature of Harmony,” in New Lessons in Harmony, ed. Filmore, J. C., Philadelphia, T. Presser, 1887
Gjerdingen, R. as Studies on the Origin of Harmonic Tonality, Princeton University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Goehr, A. “The Theoretical Writings of Arnold Schoenberg,” Perspectives of New Music, 14 (1975)Google Scholar
Gossett, P. as Treatise on Harmony, New York, Dover, 1971Google Scholar
Grave, F. K. “Abbé Vogler’s Theory of Reduction,” Current Musicology 29 (1980)Google Scholar
Grave, F. K. and Grave, M. G., In Praise of Harmony: The Teachings of Abbé Georg Joseph Vogler, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1987Google Scholar
Halm, A.Harmonielehre, Leipzig, G. J. Göschen, 1902Google Scholar
Harrison, D.Harmonic Function in Chromatic Music: A Renewed Dualist Theory and an Account of Its Precedents, University of Chicago Press, 1994Google Scholar
Hauptmann, M.Die Natur der Harmonik und der Metrik, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1853Google Scholar
Heathcote, W. as The Nature of Harmony and Metre, London, S. Sonnenschein, 1888Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H.Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologischer Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik (1863), 4th edn., Braunschweig, F. Vieweg, 1877Google Scholar
Hostinský, O.Die Lehre von den musikalischen Klängen: Ein Beitrag zur aesthetischen Begründung der Harmonie-Lehre, Prague, H. Dominicus, 1879Google Scholar
Hyer, Brian, “Reimag(in)ing Riemann,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 39 (1995)Google Scholar
Hynais, C. “Die Harmonik Richard Wagners in Bezug auf die Fundamentaltheorie Sechters,” Neue musikalische Presse 10 (1901)Google Scholar
Bent, I. as “Prelude No. 8 (in D minor)” from Thirty-two Preludes for Organ or Piano, together with an Aesthetic, Rhetorical and Harmonic Analysis, in Music Analysis in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols., ed. Bent, I. (vol. I: Fugue, Form and Style, vol. II: Hermeneutic Approaches), Cambridge University Press, 1994, vol. IGoogle Scholar
Imig, R.Systeme der Funktions-Bezeichnung in den Harmonielehren seit Hugo Riemann, Düsseldorf, Gesellschaft zur Förderung der systematischen Musikwissenschaft, 1970Google Scholar
Jadassohn, S.Melodik und Harmonik bei Richard Wagner, Berlin, Verlagsgesellschaft für Literatur und Kunst, 1899Google Scholar
Jelensperger, D.L’Harmonie au commencement du 19me siècle, Paris, Zetter, 1830Google Scholar
Karg-Elert, S.Polaristische Klang- und Tonalitätslehre, Leipzig, Leuckhart, 1931Google Scholar
Kirnberger, J. P.Die Kunst des reinen Satzes, 2 vols., Berlin, Decker and Hartung, 1771–79; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1968 and 1988Google Scholar
Kistler, C.Harmonielehre, 3rd edn., Heizbronn, C. F. Schmidt, 1899Google Scholar
Knecht, J. H.Elementarwerk der Harmonie, Munich, Falter, 1814Google Scholar
Kurth, E.Die Voraussetzungen der theoretischen Harmonik und der tonalen Darstellungssysteme, Bern, M. Drechsel, 1913Google Scholar
Kurth, E.Romantische Harmonik und ihre Krise in Wagners “Tristan”, 3rd edn. Berlin, M. Hesse, 1923; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1968 and 1988Google Scholar
Lefèvre, G.Traité d’harmonie, Paris, E. Niedermeyer, 1889Google Scholar
Lester, J.Compositional Theory in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Lewin, D. “A Formal Theory of Generalized Tonal Functions,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 26 (1982)Google Scholar
Louis, R. and Thuille, L., Harmonielehre, 7th edn., Stuttgart, C. Grüninger, 1907Google Scholar
Mayrberger, K.Die Harmonik Richard Wagners an den Leitmotiv aus “Tristan und Isolde” erläutert, Bayreuth, Bayreuther Patronaterverein, 1881Google Scholar
Mayrberger, K.Lehrbuch der musikalischen Harmonik, Pressburg [Bratislava], G. Heckenast, 1878Google Scholar
Mickelsen, W. C., trans. and ed., Hugo Riemann’s Theory of Harmony: a Study (trans. of Geschichte der Musiktheorie im IX.–XIX. Jahrhundert, vol. III), Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1977Google Scholar
Morgan, R. P. “Schenker and the Theoretical Tradition,” College Music Symposium 18 (1978)Google Scholar
Oettingen, A. von, Harmoniesystem in dualer Entwickelung, Dorpat, W. Gläser, 1866Google Scholar
Orel, A.Ein Harmonielehrekolleg bei Anton Bruckner, Berlin, Verlag für Wirtschaft und Kultur, 1940Google Scholar
Polak, A. J.Die Harmonisierung der indischer, türkischer und japanischer Melodien; neue Beiträge zur Lehre von den Tonempfindungen, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1905Google Scholar
Rameau, J.-P.Traité de l’harmonie reduite à ses principes naturels, Paris, Ballard, 1722Google Scholar
Richter, E. F.Lehrbuch der Harmonielehre, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1853Google Scholar
Riemann, H. “Das Problem des harmonischen Dualismus,” Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 17 (1905)Google Scholar
Riemann, H. “Die Natur der Harmonik,” Sammlung musikalischer Vorträge 4/40 (1882)Google Scholar
Riemann, H. “Ideen zu einer ‘Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,’” Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters 21 (1914)Google Scholar
Riemann, H. “Neue Beiträge zu einer Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,” Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters 23 (1916)Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Grosse Kompositionslehre, 2 vols., Berlin, Spemann, 1902–03Google Scholar
Riemann, H.L. van Beethovens sämtliche Klavier-Solosonaten: Ästhetische und formal-technische Analyse mit historischen Notizen, 3 vols., Berlin, M. Hesse, 1917–19Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Musikalische Logik, Leipzig, C. F. Kahnt, 1874Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Musikalische Syntaxis, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1877Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Vereinfachte Harmonielehre, oder die Lehre von den tonalen Funktionen der Akkorde, London, Augener, 1893Google Scholar
Rummenhöller, P. “Der deskriptive Theoriebegriff Gottfried Webers,” in Musiktheoretisches Denken im 19. Jahrhundert, ed. Rummenhöller, P., Regensburg, G. Bosse, 1967Google Scholar
Saslaw, J. “Gottfried Weber and Multiple Meaning,” Theoria 5 (1990–91)Google Scholar
Saslaw, J. and Walsh, J. P., “Musical Invariance as a Cognitive Structure: ‘Multiple Meaning’ in the Early Nineteenth Century,” in Music Theory in the Age of Romanticism, ed. Bent, I., Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar
Schenker, H. “Rameau or Beethoven? Creeping Paralysis or Spiritual Potency in Music?,” in The Masterwork in Music, vol. III (1930), Drabkin, W., trans. Bent, I. et al., Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar
Schenker, H.Counterpoint, 2 vols. (1910–22), trans. and ed. Rothgeb, J., trans. Thym, J., New York, Schirmer, 1987Google Scholar
Schoenberg, A.Coherence, Counterpoint, Instrumentation, Instruction in Form (Zusammenhang, Kontrapunkt, Instrumentation, Formenlehre), trans. and ed. Neff, S., trans. Cross, C., Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1994Google Scholar
Schoenberg, A.Harmonielehre (1911), 3rd edn., Vienna, Universal, 1922Google Scholar
Schoenberg, A.Structural Functions of Harmony, ed. Searle, H., New York, Norton, 1954; rev. ed. Stein, L., New York, Norton, 1969Google Scholar
Schoenberg, A.The Musical Idea and the Logic, Technique, and Art of Its Presentation (Der musikalische Gedanke, und die Logik, Technik, und Kunst seiner Darstellung), bilingual, ed. and trans. Carpenter, P. and Neff, S., New York, Columbia University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Schreyer, J.Harmonielehre, Dresden, Holz and Pahl, 1905Google Scholar
Schröder, H.Die symmetrische Umkehrung in der Musik, Leipzig, Publikationen der International Musikgesellschaft, 1902Google Scholar
Sechter, S.Die Grundsätze der musikalischen Komposition, 3 vols., Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1853–54; vol. I trans. and ed. Müller, C. as The Correct Order of the Fundamental Harmonies: A Treatise on Fundamental Basses, and their Inversions and Substitutes, New York, W. A. Pond, 1871Google Scholar
Seidel, E. “Die Harmonielehre Hugo Riemanns,” in Beiträge der Musiktheorie des 19. Jahrhunderts, ed. Vogel, M., Regensburg, G. Bosse, 1966Google Scholar
Simms, B. “New Documents in the Schoenberg–Schenker Polemic,” Perspectives of New Music 16 (1977–78)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. J. “The Functional Extravagance of Chromatic Chords,” Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 1979– 8 (1986)Google Scholar
Spies, C. “Vortrag/12 tk/Princeton,” Perspectives of New Music 13 (1974)Google Scholar
Thompson, D. M.A History of Harmonic Theory in the United States, Kent, OH, Kent State University Press, 1980Google Scholar
Tittel, E. “Wiener Musiktheorie von Fux bis Schoenberg,” in Beiträge zur Musiktheorie des 19. Jahrhunderts, ed. Vogel, M., Regensburg, G. Bosse, 1966Google Scholar
Vogel, M. “Arthur v. Oettingen und der harmonische Dualismus,” Beiträge zur Musiktheorie des 19. Jahrhunderts, ed. Vogel, M., Regensburg, G. Bosse, 1966Google Scholar
Vogel, M.Der Tristan-Akkord und die Krise der modernen Harmonielehre, Düsseldorf, Gesellschaft der systematischen Musikwissenschaft, 1963Google Scholar
Vogler, G. J. “Summe der Harmonik,” Betrachtungen der Mannheimer Tonschule 3 (1780–81); 4 (1781)Google Scholar
Vogler, G. J.Zwei und dreisig Präludien für die Orgel und für das Fortepiano, Munich, Falter, 1806; partial trans.Google Scholar
Vogler, G. J.Handbuch zur Harmonielehre und für den Generalbass, Prague, K. Barth, 1802Google Scholar
Vogler, G. J.Tonwissenschaft und Tonsezkunst, Mannheim, Kurfürstliche Hofbuchdruckerei, 1776; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1970Google Scholar
Warner, J. as The Theory of Musical Composition, 2 vols., Boston, J. Wilkens and R. Carter, 1842–46; revised trans. by Bishop, J., London, R. Cocks, 1851Google Scholar
Wason, R. and Marvin, E. West as “Riemann’s ‘Ideen zu einer Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen’: An Annotated Translation,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 36 (1992)
Wason, R. W. “Progressive Harmonic Theory in the Mid-Nineteenth-Century,” Journal of Musicological Research 8 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wason, R. W. “Schenker’s Notion of Scale-Step in Historical Perspective: Non-Essential Harmonies in Viennese Fundamental Bass Theories,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 27 (1983)Google Scholar
Wason, R. W.Viennese Harmonic Theory from Albrechtsberger to Schenker and Schoenberg, Ann Arbor, UMI Research Press, 1985Google Scholar
Weber, G. “Ueber eine besonders merkwürdige Stelle in einem Mozart’schen Violinquartett aus C,” in Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst, vol. III, Mainz, B. Schott, 1830–32, vol. IIIGoogle Scholar
Weber, G.Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst, 3 vols., Mainz, B. Schott, 1817–21; 2nd edn., 4 vols., 1824; 3rd revised edn., 4 vols., 1830–32Google Scholar
Weitzmann, C. F.Die neue harmonielehren im Streit mit der alten, Leipzig, C. F. Kahnt, 1861Google Scholar
Werts, D. “The Musical Circle of Johannes Mattheson,” Theoria 1 (1985)Google Scholar
Zeleny, W.Die historischen Grundlagen des Theoriesystems von Simon Sechter, Tutzing, H. Schneider, 1979Google Scholar
Ziehn, B.Harmonie- und Modulationslehre, Berlin, C. Friedrich, 1887Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×