Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- PART I DISCIPLINING MUSIC THEORY
- PART II SPECULATIVE TRADITIONS
- PART III REGULATIVE TRADITIONS
- A Mapping tonal spaces
- B Compositional Theory
- C Time
- D Tonality
- 23 Tonality
- 24 Rameau and eighteenth-century harmonic theory
- 25 Nineteenth-century harmonic theory: the Austro-German legacy
- 26 Heinrich Schenker
- PART IV DESCRIPTIVE TRADITIONS
- Index of authors
- Index of subjects
- References
25 - Nineteenth-century harmonic theory: the Austro-German legacy
from D - Tonality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- PART I DISCIPLINING MUSIC THEORY
- PART II SPECULATIVE TRADITIONS
- PART III REGULATIVE TRADITIONS
- A Mapping tonal spaces
- B Compositional Theory
- C Time
- D Tonality
- 23 Tonality
- 24 Rameau and eighteenth-century harmonic theory
- 25 Nineteenth-century harmonic theory: the Austro-German legacy
- 26 Heinrich Schenker
- PART IV DESCRIPTIVE TRADITIONS
- Index of authors
- Index of subjects
- References
Summary
Today most scholars agree that Rameau was the founder of modern harmonic theory. As we have seen in the previous chapter, Rameau attempted to synthesize in his many writings a multiplicity of ideas – both old and new, speculative and practical – into a unified theory of tonal harmony grounded upon a single underlying principle, the corps sonore (see Chapter 24, pp. 759–71). If he did not succeed in creating a truly systematic and stable theory of harmony owing to his many differing and often contradictory theoretical arguments and intellectual borrowings, he nonetheless bequeathed to the nineteenth century a number of compelling and richly suggestive ideas that would inspire theorists in their own efforts.
In this chapter, we will look at the evolution of harmonic theory in the nineteenth century. This is of course a vast and complex topic. Given the profound changes in harmonic language between 1800 and 1900 – a period covering the end of Viennese Classicism and closing with Schoenberg’s first tentative steps beyond the tonal system – it is not surprising that theorists expended extraordinary energy and efforts in their attempts to rationalize this shifting practice. As it is impossible here to describe all of these efforts in detail, we will limit our scope to the development of Austro-German harmonic theory, a tradition which arguably encompasses some of the most innovative and influential writings on this topic for the entire century. Within this tradition, three individual trajectories can be traced back by differing routes to Rameau’s own theory: scale-degree (Stufen) theory, fundamental-bass theory, and function theory.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory , pp. 778 - 811Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
“At the Cutting Edge: Three American Theorists at the End of the Nineteenth Century,” International Journal of Musicology, 2 (1993)Google Scholar
as “A Particularly Remarkable Passage in a String Quartet in C by Mozart, k. 465 (‘Dissonance’),” in Music Analysis in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols., ed. (vol. I: Fugue, Form and Style, vol. II: Hermeneutic Approaches), Cambridge University Press, 1994, vol. IGoogle Scholar
as “The Harmonic Style of Richard Wagner, Elucidated with Respect to the Leitmotifs of ‘Tristan and Isolde,’” in Music Analysis in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols., ed. (vol. I: Fugue, Form and Style, vol. II: Hermeneutic Approaches), Cambridge University Press, 1994 vol. I (1994)Google Scholar
“Georg Capellen on Tristan und Isolde: Analytical Systems in Conflict at the Turn of the Twentieth Century,” Theoria 4 (1989)Google Scholar
“Georg Capellen’s Theory of Reduction,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 37 (1993)Google Scholar
“Schoenberg Contra Riemann: Stufen, Regions, Verwandschaft, and the Theory of Tonal Function,” Theoria 6 (1992)Google Scholar
“Symmetry and Symmetrical Inversion in Turn-of-the-Century Theory and Practice,” in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past, ed. and , University of Chicago Press, 1993Google Scholar
Vorlesungen über Harmonie und Kontrapunkt an der Universität Wien, ed. , Vienna, Österreichischer Bundesverlag für Unterricht, Wissenschaft, und Kunst, 1950Google Scholar
“Method and Motivation in Hugo Riemann’s History of Harmonic Theory,” Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 1979– 14 (1992)Google Scholar
“Die Unmöglichkeit und Überflussigkeit der dualistischen Molltheorie Riemanns,” Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 97 (1901)Google Scholar
Ist das System S. Sechters ein geeigneter Ausgangspunkt für die theoretische Wagnerforschung?, Leipzig, C. F. Kahnt, 1902Google Scholar
Die Zukunft der Musiktheorie (Dualismus oder “Monismus”?) und ihre Einwirkung auf die Praxis, Leipzig, C. F. Kahnt, 1905Google Scholar
Ein neuer exotischer Musikstil an Notenbeispielen nachgewiesen, Stuttgart, C. Grüninger, 1906Google Scholar
“The Rule of the Octave in Thorough-Bass Theory and Practice,” Acta Musicologica, International Musicological Socety, Basel, Bärenreiter et al., 1928– 64 (1992)Google Scholar
“Schoenberg and Schenker,” in Schoenberg and the New Music: Essays by Carl Dahlhaus, trans. and , Cambridge University Press, 1987Google Scholar
Untersuchungen über die Entstehung der harmonischen Tonalität, Kassel, Bärenreiter, 1968Google Scholar
“Réflexions sur la théorie de la musique” (1777), in Œuvres et Correspondances inédites de d’Alembert, Geneva, Slatkine, 1967Google Scholar
“Schoenberg and the Writings of Heinrich Schenker,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute, 2/1 (1977)Google Scholar
as On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, 2nd edn., London, Longmans and Green, 1885; reprint New York, Dover, 1954Google Scholar
Studien zur Harmonie und Klangtechnik der neueren Musik, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1927Google Scholar
Akkord und Stimmführung in den musiktheoretischen Systemen von Hugo Riemann, Ernst Kurth und Heinrich Schenker, Vienna, Österreichische Akadamie der Wissenschaften, 1981Google Scholar
as “The Nature of Harmony,” in New Lessons in Harmony, ed. , Philadelphia, T. Presser, 1887
and , In Praise of Harmony: The Teachings of Abbé Georg Joseph Vogler, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1987Google Scholar
Harmonic Function in Chromatic Music: A Renewed Dualist Theory and an Account of Its Precedents, University of Chicago Press, 1994Google Scholar
Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologischer Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik (1863), 4th edn., Braunschweig, F. Vieweg, 1877Google Scholar
Die Lehre von den musikalischen Klängen: Ein Beitrag zur aesthetischen Begründung der Harmonie-Lehre, Prague, H. Dominicus, 1879Google Scholar
, “Reimag(in)ing Riemann,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 39 (1995)Google Scholar
“Die Harmonik Richard Wagners in Bezug auf die Fundamentaltheorie Sechters,” Neue musikalische Presse 10 (1901)Google Scholar
as “Prelude No. 8 (in D minor)” from Thirty-two Preludes for Organ or Piano, together with an Aesthetic, Rhetorical and Harmonic Analysis, in Music Analysis in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols., ed. (vol. I: Fugue, Form and Style, vol. II: Hermeneutic Approaches), Cambridge University Press, 1994, vol. IGoogle Scholar
Systeme der Funktions-Bezeichnung in den Harmonielehren seit Hugo Riemann, Düsseldorf, Gesellschaft zur Förderung der systematischen Musikwissenschaft, 1970Google Scholar
Melodik und Harmonik bei Richard Wagner, Berlin, Verlagsgesellschaft für Literatur und Kunst, 1899Google Scholar
Die Kunst des reinen Satzes, 2 vols., Berlin, Decker and Hartung, 1771–79; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1968 and 1988Google Scholar
Die Voraussetzungen der theoretischen Harmonik und der tonalen Darstellungssysteme, Bern, M. Drechsel, 1913Google Scholar
Romantische Harmonik und ihre Krise in Wagners “Tristan”, 3rd edn. Berlin, M. Hesse, 1923; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1968 and 1988Google Scholar
Compositional Theory in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1992Google Scholar
“A Formal Theory of Generalized Tonal Functions,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 26 (1982)Google Scholar
Die Harmonik Richard Wagners an den Leitmotiv aus “Tristan und Isolde” erläutert, Bayreuth, Bayreuther Patronaterverein, 1881Google Scholar
, trans. and ed., Hugo Riemann’s Theory of Harmony: a Study (trans. of Geschichte der Musiktheorie im IX.–XIX. Jahrhundert, vol. III), Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1977Google Scholar
Ein Harmonielehrekolleg bei Anton Bruckner, Berlin, Verlag für Wirtschaft und Kultur, 1940Google Scholar
Die Harmonisierung der indischer, türkischer und japanischer Melodien; neue Beiträge zur Lehre von den Tonempfindungen, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1905Google Scholar
“Ideen zu einer ‘Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,’” Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters 21 (1914)Google Scholar
“Neue Beiträge zu einer Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,” Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters 23 (1916)Google Scholar
L. van Beethovens sämtliche Klavier-Solosonaten: Ästhetische und formal-technische Analyse mit historischen Notizen, 3 vols., Berlin, M. Hesse, 1917–19Google Scholar
Vereinfachte Harmonielehre, oder die Lehre von den tonalen Funktionen der Akkorde, London, Augener, 1893Google Scholar
“Der deskriptive Theoriebegriff Gottfried Webers,” in Musiktheoretisches Denken im 19. Jahrhundert, ed. , Regensburg, G. Bosse, 1967Google Scholar
and , “Musical Invariance as a Cognitive Structure: ‘Multiple Meaning’ in the Early Nineteenth Century,” in Music Theory in the Age of Romanticism, ed. , Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar
“Rameau or Beethoven? Creeping Paralysis or Spiritual Potency in Music?,” in The Masterwork in Music, vol. III (1930), , trans. et al., Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar
Coherence, Counterpoint, Instrumentation, Instruction in Form (Zusammenhang, Kontrapunkt, Instrumentation, Formenlehre), trans. and ed. , trans. , Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1994Google Scholar
Structural Functions of Harmony, ed. , New York, Norton, 1954; rev. ed. , New York, Norton, 1969Google Scholar
The Musical Idea and the Logic, Technique, and Art of Its Presentation (Der musikalische Gedanke, und die Logik, Technik, und Kunst seiner Darstellung), ed. and trans. and , New York, Columbia University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Die symmetrische Umkehrung in der Musik, Leipzig, Publikationen der International Musikgesellschaft, 1902Google Scholar
Die Grundsätze der musikalischen Komposition, 3 vols., Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1853–54; vol. I trans. and ed. as The Correct Order of the Fundamental Harmonies: A Treatise on Fundamental Basses, and their Inversions and Substitutes, New York, W. A. Pond, 1871Google Scholar
“Die Harmonielehre Hugo Riemanns,” in Beiträge der Musiktheorie des 19. Jahrhunderts, ed. , Regensburg, G. Bosse, 1966Google Scholar
“New Documents in the Schoenberg–Schenker Polemic,” Perspectives of New Music 16 (1977–78)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Functional Extravagance of Chromatic Chords,” Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 1979– 8 (1986)Google Scholar
A History of Harmonic Theory in the United States, Kent, OH, Kent State University Press, 1980Google Scholar
“Wiener Musiktheorie von Fux bis Schoenberg,” in Beiträge zur Musiktheorie des 19. Jahrhunderts, ed. , Regensburg, G. Bosse, 1966Google Scholar
“Arthur v. Oettingen und der harmonische Dualismus,” Beiträge zur Musiktheorie des 19. Jahrhunderts, ed. , Regensburg, G. Bosse, 1966Google Scholar
Der Tristan-Akkord und die Krise der modernen Harmonielehre, Düsseldorf, Gesellschaft der systematischen Musikwissenschaft, 1963Google Scholar
Zwei und dreisig Präludien für die Orgel und für das Fortepiano, Munich, Falter, 1806; partial trans.Google Scholar
Tonwissenschaft und Tonsezkunst, Mannheim, Kurfürstliche Hofbuchdruckerei, 1776; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1970Google Scholar
as The Theory of Musical Composition, 2 vols., Boston, J. Wilkens and R. Carter, 1842–46; revised trans. by , London, R. Cocks, 1851Google Scholar
and as “Riemann’s ‘Ideen zu einer Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen’: An Annotated Translation,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 36 (1992)
“Progressive Harmonic Theory in the Mid-Nineteenth-Century,” Journal of Musicological Research 8 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Schenker’s Notion of Scale-Step in Historical Perspective: Non-Essential Harmonies in Viennese Fundamental Bass Theories,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 27 (1983)Google Scholar
Viennese Harmonic Theory from Albrechtsberger to Schenker and Schoenberg, Ann Arbor, UMI Research Press, 1985Google Scholar
“Ueber eine besonders merkwürdige Stelle in einem Mozart’schen Violinquartett aus C,” in Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst, vol. III, Mainz, B. Schott, 1830–32, vol. IIIGoogle Scholar
Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst, 3 vols., Mainz, B. Schott, 1817–21; 2nd edn., 4 vols., 1824; 3rd revised edn., 4 vols., 1830–32Google Scholar
Die historischen Grundlagen des Theoriesystems von Simon Sechter, Tutzing, H. Schneider, 1979Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by