From acoustics to <span class='italic'>Tonpsychologie</span>

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521623711.011

9 - From acoustics to Tonpsychologie

from PART II - SPECULATIVE TRADITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Burdette Green and

David Butler

Edited by

Thomas Christensen

Show author details

Thomas Christensen: Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The rise of Tonpsychologie as a scientific discipline in the nineteenth century was a key moment in the history of music theory. It revived topics hitherto situated in the venerable, although largely enfeebled, study of speculative harmonics, and at the same time prefigured future directions for research in music perception. In the final third of the century, this research field underwent two major epistemological shifts that revolved around the German polymaths Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–94) and Carl Stumpf (1848–1936). Both of these scientists were accomplished amateur musicians; both were avidly interested in music theory. Using experimental methods to study pitch organization and the physiology of hearing, they tried to answer age-old ontological questions of musica theorica: what are the origins and nature of musical sound, consonance, harmony, and scales? In so doing, they offered fresh perspectives that can be appreciated only by distinguishing their individual viewpoints and by reviewing the long prehistory of their work.

The scientific revolution of the seventeenth century gave birth to the experimental/empirical methods of natural science and stirred interest in the physical basis of pitch organization. Physical acoustics fascinated investigators from Mersenne to Helmholtz and largely replaced the dominating mode of speculative, numerical inquiry. Questions about harmony and about consonance and dissonance were now evaluated acoustically rather than by reference to canonics. By the middle of the nineteenth century it became apparent that experimental methods could be applied not only to the physics of music but also to the physiology of hearing and the psychology of perception.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory , pp. 246 - 271

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521623711.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, M. G.Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1976; Holism and the Quest for Objectivity, Cambridge University Press, 1995Google Scholar

Barbour, J. M. Introduction to Smith, R., Harmonics or the Philosophy of Musical Sounds (1749), facs. New York, Da Capo Press, 1966, pp. –xiGoogle Scholar

Barker, A.Greek Musical Writings, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, 1984–89Google Scholar

Benade, A. H.Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics, New York, Dover, 1976Google Scholar

Benedetti, , De intervallis musicis (1585).Google Scholar

Blumenthal, A. L. “Shaping a Tradition: Experimentalism Begins,” in Points of View in the Modern History of Psychology, ed. Buxton, C. E., Orlando, Academic Press, 1985Google Scholar

Boring, E. G.A History of Experimental Psychology, 2nd edn., New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950Google Scholar

Boring, E. G.Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1942Google Scholar

Butler, D. M. “Describing the Perception of Tonality in Music: A Proposal for a Theory of Intervallic Rivalry,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 6 (1989)Google Scholar

Butler, D. M.The Musician’s Guide to Perception and Cognition, New York, Schirmer, 1992Google Scholar

Cannon, J. T. and Dostrovsky, S., The Evolution of Dynamics: Vibration Theory from 1687 to 1742, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1981CrossRef Google Scholar

Cazden, N. “Sensory Theories of Musical Consonance,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (1962)CrossRef Google Scholar

Chladni, E. F. F.Entdeckungen über die Theorie des Klanges (1787), trans. Lindsay, R. B. in Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development, ed. Lindsay, , Stroudsburg, PA, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973Google Scholar

Christensen, T. “Eighteenth-Century Science and the Corps Sonore: The Scientific Background to Rameau’s Principle of Harmony,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 31 (1987)Google Scholar

Christensen, T. “Sensus, Ratio, and Phthongos: Mattheson’s Theory of Tone Perception,” in Musical Transformation and Musical Intuition, ed. Atlas, R. and Cherlin, M., Boston, Ovenbird Press, 1994Google Scholar

Christensen, T.Rameau and Musical Thought in the Enlightenment, Cambridge University Press, 1993Google Scholar

Clark, S. “Schenker’s Mysterious Five,” Nineteenth Century Music 23 (1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, H. F.Quantifying Music: The Science of Music at the First Stage of the Scientific Revolution, 1580–1650, Dordrecht, D. Reidel, 1984CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, R. S. and Elkana, Y., “Introduction: Helmholtz in the History of Scientific Method,” in Hermann von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings, ed. Cohen, and Elkana, , Dordrecht, Reidel, 1977Google Scholar

Davies, J. B.The Psychology of Music, Stanford University Press, 1978Google Scholar

Descartes, R.Compendium musicae, Utrecht, Zijll, G. and ab Ackersdijck, T., 1650Google Scholar

Euler, L. “Letter to Joseph Louis Lagrange, from Berlin” (1759), trans. Lindsay, R. B. in Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development, ed. Lindsay, , Stroudsburg, A. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973Google Scholar

Euler, L.Tentamen novae theoriae musicae, St. Petersburg, Academiae Scientarium, 1739; facs. New York, Broude, 1968Google Scholar

Fancher, R. E.Pioneers of Psychology, New York, Norton, 1979Google Scholar

Farnsworth, P. R.Social Psychology of Music, 2nd edn., Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1969Google Scholar

Fontenelle, B., “Sur la determination d’un son fixe” (1700), in Joseph Sauveur, Collected Writings on Musical Acoustics (Paris 1700–1713), ed. Rasch, R., Utrecht, Diapason Press, 1984Google Scholar

Fracastoro, , De sympathia et antipathia rerum (1546).Google Scholar

Galileo, G.Two New Sciences; including Centers of Gravity and Force of Percussion (1638), trans. Drake, S., Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1974Google Scholar

Galpin, F. W. “Monsieur Prin and his Trumpet Marine,” Music and Letters 14 (1933)CrossRef Google Scholar

Gardner, H.The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution, New York, Basic Books, 1985Google Scholar

Gouk, P.Music, Science and Natural Magic in Seventeenth-Century England, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Hall, D. E.Musical Acoustics: An Introduction, Belmont, CA, Wadsworth, 1980Google Scholar

Handel, S.Listening, An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1989Google Scholar

Hauptmann, M.Die Natur der Harmonik und der Metrik, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1853; trans. Heathcote, W. E. as The Nature of Harmony and Metre, London, S. Sonnenschein, 1888Google Scholar

Heidbreder, E.Seven Psychologies, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1933Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. “On the Physiological Causes of Harmony in Music” (1857), in Helmholtz on Perception: Its Physiology and Development, ed. Warren, R. M. and Warren, R. P., New York, J. Wiley, 1968Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. “On the Rate of Transmission of the Nerve Impulse” (1850), trans. Dietze, A. G. in Readings in the History of Psychology, ed. Dennis, W., New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1948Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H.Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologischer Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik (1863), 4th edn., Braunschweig, F. Vieweg, 1877; trans. Ellis, A. J. as On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, 2nd edn., London, Longman and Green, 1885; reprint New York, Dover, 1954Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H.Handbuch der physiologischen Optik, 3 vols., Hamburg and Leipzig, L. Voss, 1856–67, 3rd edn., 1909–11; trans. Southall, J. P. C. as Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3 vols., Rochester, NY, Optical Society of America, 1924–25; reprint New York, Dover, 1962Google Scholar

Hunt, F. V.Origins in Acoustics: The Science of Sound from Antiquity to the Age of Newton, Yale University Press, 1978Google Scholar

Jones, A. T. “The Discovery of Difference Tones,” American Physics Teacher 3 (1935)Google Scholar

Kirnberger, J. P.Die Kunst des reinen Satzes, Berlin, 1771–79; partial trans. Beach, D. and Thym, J. as The Art of Strict Musical Composition, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1982Google Scholar

Klein, M.Mathematics in Western Culture, Oxford University Press, 1953Google Scholar

Lester, J.Compositional Theory in The Eighteenth Century, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1992Google Scholar

Lindsay, R. B. “The Story of Acoustics,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39 (1966)CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ludwig, H.Marin Mersenne und seine Musiklehre, Halle, Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses, 1935Google Scholar

Lundin, R. W.An Objective Psychology of Music, New York, Ronald Press, 1953Google Scholar

Mersenne, M.Harmonie universelle, Paris, Cramoisy, 1636–37; facs. Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1963 and 1986; Book IV trans. Chapman, R. E. as Harmonie universelle: The Books on Instruments, The Hague, M. Nijhoff, 1957Google Scholar

Mersenne, M.Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne, ed. Waard, C. et al., 10 vols., Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1945–67Google Scholar

Mersenne, M.Quaestiones celeberrimae in Genesim, Paris, S. Cramoisy, 1623Google Scholar

Mickelsen, W. C.Hugo Riemann’s Theory of Harmony: A Study and History of Music Theory, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1977Google Scholar

Müller, J. “The Specific Energies of Nerves” (1838), trans. Braly, W. in Readings in the History of Psychology, ed. Dennis, W., New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1948Google Scholar

Murphy, G. and Kovach, J. K., Historical Introduction to Modern Psychology, 3rd edn., New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972Google Scholar

Murray, D. J.A History of Western Psychology, 2nd edn., Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, 1988Google Scholar

North, R.Cursory Notes of Musicke (c. 1698–1703): A Physical, Psychological and Critical Theory, ed. Chan, M. and Kassler, J. C., Kensington, Australia, Unisearch Limited, University of New South Wales, 1986Google Scholar

North, R.The Lives of the Norths (1740), 2nd edn., 3 vols., London, H. Colbur, 1826Google Scholar

Ohm, G. S. “On the Definition of a Tone with the Associated Theory of the Siren and Similar Sound Producing Devices” (1843), trans. Lindsay, R. B. in Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development, ed. Lindsay, , Stroudsburg, PA. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973Google Scholar

Œuvres de Descartes, vol. x, ed. Adam, C. and Tannery, P., Paris, L. Cerf, 1908; facs. Strasbourg, Heitz, 1965 and New York, Broude, 1968Google Scholar

Palisca, C. V. “Scientific Empiricism,” in Seventeenth Century Science in the Arts, ed. Rhys, H. H., Princeton University Press, 1961Google Scholar

Palisca, C. V. and Spender, N., “Consonance” in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, ed. Sadie, S., 20 vols., London, Macmillan; Washington, D.C., Grove’s Dictionaries of Music, 1980, vol. VIGoogle Scholar

Partch, H.Genesis of a Music, 2nd edn., New York, Da Capo Press, 1974Google Scholar

Pierce, J. R.The Science of Musical Sound, rev. edn., New York, Freeman, 1992Google Scholar

Rameau, J.-P.Code de musique pratique, Paris, Imprimerie royale, 1760; facs. New York, Broude, 1965Google Scholar

Rasch, R. A. and Plomp, R., “The Perception of Musical Tones,” in The Psychology of Music, ed. Deutsch, D., San Diego, Academic Press, 1982Google Scholar

Rasch, R. A. Introduction to Joseph Sauveur: Collected Writings on Musical Acoustics (Paris 1700–1713), ed. Rasch, R. A., Utrecht, Diapason Press, 1984Google Scholar

Rayleigh, J. W. S.The Theory of Sound, 2 vols. (2nd edn., 1894), New York, Dover, 1945Google Scholar

Révész, G.Zur Grundlegung der Tonpsychologie, Leipzig, Veit, 1913Google Scholar

Riemann, H. “Zur Theorie der Konsonanz und Dissonanz” (1901), in Präludien und Studien, vol. III, Leipzig, H. Seemann, 1901; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1967Google Scholar

Risset, J.-C. and Wessel, D. L., “Exploration of Timbre by Analysis and Synthesis,” in The Psychology of Music, ed. Deutsch, D., San Diego, Academic Press, 1982Google Scholar

Roberts, F. “A Discourse concerning the Musical Notes on the Trumpet, and the Trumpet Marine, and of the Defects of the Same,” Philosophical Transcriptions of the Royal Society of London 16 (1692)Google Scholar

Rothfarb, L. A. “Ernst Kurth’s Die Voraussetzungen der theoretischen Harmonik and the Beginnings of Music Psychology,” Theoria 4 (1989)Google Scholar

Rothfarb, L. A. (ed.), Ernst Kurth: Selected Writings, Cambridge University Press, 1991Google Scholar

Sauveur, J. “Application des sons harmoniques à la composition des jeux d’orgues” (1702), in Joseph Sauveur: Collected Writings on Musical Acoustics (Paris 1700–1713), ed. Rasch, R., Utrecht, Diapason Press, 1984Google Scholar

Sauveur, J. “Système général des intervalles des sons, et son application à tous les systèmes et à tous les instrumens de musique” (1701), in Joseph Sauveur: Collected Writings on Musical Acoustics (Paris 1700–1713), ed. Rasch, R., Utrecht, Diapason Press, 1984Google Scholar

Savart, F. “Sensibilité de l’ouïe” (1830), trans. Lindsay, R. B. in Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development, ed. Lindsay, , Stroudsburg, PA, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973Google Scholar

Schlick, A.Spiegel der Orgelmacher und Organisten, Mainz, P. Schöffer, 1511; facs. with trans. by Barber, E., Buren, Netherlands, F. Knuf, 1980Google Scholar

Schultz, D. P. and Schultz, S. L., A History of Modern Psychology, 5th edn., New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992Google Scholar

Shirlaw, M.The Theory of Harmony, 2nd edn., Dekalb, IL, B. Coar, 1955Google Scholar

Smith, R.Harmonics or the Philosophy of Musical Sounds (1749), facs. New York, Da Capo Press, 1966Google Scholar

Spender, N. and Shuter-Dyson, R., “Psychology of Music” in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd edn., ed. Sadie, S., 29 vols., London, Macmillan, 2001, vol. xxGoogle Scholar

Stumpf, C. “Carl Stumpf,” in Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen, ed. Schmidt, R., Leipzig, F. Meiner, 1924Google Scholar

Stumpf, C. “Hermann von Helmholtz and the New Psychology,” trans. Hibben, J. G. in Psychological Review 2 (1895)CrossRef Google Scholar

Stumpf, C. “Konsonanz und Konkordanz,” in Beiträge zur Akustik und Musikwissenschaft, vol. VI, ed. Stumpf, C., Leipzig, J. A. Barth, 1911Google Scholar

Stumpf, C.Tonpsychologie, 2 vols., Leipzig, S. Hirzel, 1883–90; reprint Hilversum, F. Knuf, 1965Google Scholar

Terhardt, E. “Concept of Musical Consonance: A Link between Music and Psychoacoustics,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 1 (1984)Google Scholar

Truesdell, C. “The Rational Mechanics of Flexible or Elastic Bodies, 1638–1788,” in Leonhardi Euleri Opera Omnia, Ser. 2/X–XI, Zurich, O. Füssli, 1960Google Scholar

Turner, R. S. “Helmholtz, Hermann von” in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. VI, ed. Gillispie, C. C. (1972)Google Scholar

Tyndall, J.Sound, 3rd. edn., New York, Appleton, 1903; reprint New York, Greenwood, 1969Google Scholar

Vogel, S. “Sensation of Tone, Perception of Sound, and Empiricism; Helmholtz’s Physiological Acoustics,” in Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundation of Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. Cahan, D., Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar

trans Robert, W. as Compendium of Music, American Institute of Musicology, 1961Google Scholar

Wallis, J. “Dr Wallis’s Letter to the Publisher, concerning a new Musical Discovery,” Philosophical Transcriptions of the Royal Society of London 12 (1677)Google Scholar

Warren, R. M. “Helmholtz and His Continuing Influence,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 1 (1984)Google Scholar

Wever, E. G. and Lawrence, M., Physiological Acoustics, Princeton University Press, 1954CrossRef Google Scholar

Zarlino, G.Le istitutioni harmoniche, Venice, Franceschi, 1558; facs., New York, Broude, 1965Google Scholar

Book contents

9 - From acoustics to Tonpsychologie

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive