Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:44:04.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - The Uses of the Social Sciences

from PART IV - SOCIAL SCIENCE AS DISCOURSE AND PRACTICE IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LIFE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Theodore M. Porter
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Dorothy Ross
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access

Summary

The idea of developing social knowledge for the purpose of social betterment assumed its modern form during the Enlightenment. In many respects, the American and French Revolutions were a culmination of that development and the first large-scale “application” of modern social and political theory. At the same time, the revolutions were often interpreted as having brought about a situation in which good social knowledge would permit the steady amelioration of social life. The ways of thinking of the social sciences were also created in that context.

The new, postrevolutionary situation altered the epistemic position of the social sciences, even though this was acknowledged only gradually. Any attempt to understand the social and political world now had to deal with the basic condition of liberty; but an emphasis on liberty alone – as in the tradition of early modern political theorizing during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries – was insufficient to understand the social order. Thus, in the words of Edmund Burke, if “the effect of liberty to individuals is, that they may do what they please [, we] ought to see what it will please them to do, before we risque congratulations.” The use orientation of the early social sciences consisted in offering a variety of ways of dealing with this situation. Aiming at finding out what it pleased individuals to do, the emerging social sciences embarked on developing empirical research strategies to provide useful knowledge. On the other hand, the concern for the practical order of the world in those social sciences translated into attempts to identify some theoretical order inherent in the nature of human beings and their ways of socializing, namely, the predictability and stability of human inclinations and their results.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam Tooze, J.La connaissance de l’activité économique: Réflexions sur l’histoire de la statistique économique en France et en Allemagne,” in Le travail et la nation: Histoire croisée de la France et de l’Allemagne, ed. Zimmermann, Bénédicte, Didry, Claude, and Wagner, Peter (Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1999).Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich and Bonß, Wolfgang, “Soziologie und Modernisierung,” Soziale Welt, 35 (1984).Google Scholar
Burke, EdmundReflections on the Revolution in France (1790), ed. Mitchell, L. G. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Desrosières, AlainThe Part in Relation to the Whole? How to Generalise: A Prehistory of Representative Sampling,” in The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880–1940, ed. Bulmer, Martin, Bales, Kevin, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Elzinga, AantResearch, Bureaucracy, and the Drift of Epistemic Criteria,” in The University Research System: Public Policies of the Home of Scientists, ed. Wittrock, Björn and Elzinga, Aant (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1985).Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., ed., The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis in The Liberal Tradition in America (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1955).Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L.The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Hawthorn, GeoffreyEnlightenment and Despair: A History of Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Heilbron, JohanMagnusson, Lars, and Wittrock, Björn, eds, The Rise of the Social Sciences and the Formation of Modernity (Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 20) (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998)Google Scholar
Horkheimer, MaxDie gegenwärtige Lage der Sozialphilosophie und die Aufgaben eines Instituts für Sozialforschung (Frankfurter Universitätsreden, vol. 37) (Frankfurt am Main: Englert und Schlosser, 1931).Google Scholar
Manicas, PeterThe Social Science Disciplines: The American Model,” in Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, ed. Wagner, Peter, Wittrock, Björn, and Whitley, Richard, (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991).Google Scholar
Rothblatt, SheldonThe Revolution of the Dons: Cambridge and Society in Victorian England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Rossem, Ronan, “The Verein für Sozialpolitik and the Fabian Society: A Study in the Sociology of Policy-Relevant Knowledge,” in Social Knowledge and the Origins of Modern Social Policies, ed. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Skocpol, Theda (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1996).Google Scholar
Schäfer, UrsulaHistorische Nationalökonomie und Sozialstatistik als Gesellschaftswissenschaften (Wien: Böhlau, 1971).Google Scholar
Therborn, GöranScience, Class and Society (London: New Left Book, 1976)Google Scholar
Wagner, PeterWittrock, Björn, and Wollmann, Hellmut, “Social Sciences and Modern States,” in Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads, ed. Wagner, Peter, Weiss, Carol H., Wittrock, Björn, and Wollmann, Hellmut (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, PeterThe Place of the Discourse on Politics among the Social Sciences: Political Science in Turn-of-the-Century Europe,” in Texts, Contexts, Concepts: Studies on Politics and Power in Language, ed. Hänninen, Sakari and Palonen, Kari (Helsinki: Finnish Political Science Association, 1990).Google Scholar
Wittrock, BjörnSocial Knowledge and Public Policy: Eight Models of Interaction,” in The Difficult Dialogue between Producers and Users of Social Science Research, ed. Nowotny, Helga and Dimaki, Jane Lambiri (Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare Training and Research, 1985)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×