Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T10:20:50.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature

from Part I - The New Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Lynn Joy
Edited by
Katharine Park  and
Lorraine Daston
Katharine Park
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Lorraine Daston
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin
Get access

Summary

The story of the changing forms of explanation adopted in the early modern sciences is too often told as a story of the wholesale rejection of the systematic Aristotelian treatment of causal questions that flourished in medieval as well as ancient science. Narratives of this sort have ignored a promising alternative way of understanding the multifaceted transformation that occurred in early modern natural philosophers’ beliefs about causality. By focusing instead on the Aristotelian tradition’s contributions to the development of rival forms of explanation, it becomes possible to characterize these new sorts of explanations against a rich conceptual background. Of course, scientific innovators in the period 1500–1800 did widely reject Aristotle’s account of the four kinds of causes as a source of acceptable theories in the specific sciences. But a more tempered view of this rejection may better reveal how the new sorts of explanations were actually conceived by their originators.

THREE NOTABLE CHANGES IN EARLY MODERN SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATIONS

This chapter considers three notable changes in early modern scientific explanations. The first was a change in the overall purpose of scientific research that was initiated by those critics of Aristotelianism who relinquished Aristotle’s goal of understanding the form of each natural substance. Rather than trying to elucidate each substance’s form, early modern innovators in the specific sciences, as well as natural philosophy, sought to determine the fundamental constituent parts – whether elements or atoms – of each kind of material body and also to identify the lawlike regularities exhibited in the organization and motions of these fundamental elements or atoms.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 70 - 105
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas Thomas, SaintDe principiis naturae, critical Latin text, ed. Pauson, John J. (Textus Philosophici Friburgenses, 2) (Fribourg: Société Philosophique, 1950), chap. 5.Google Scholar
Aquinas, ThomasDe principiis naturae, chap. 4, translated in Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements, ed. Bobik, Joseph (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Aristotle, Metaphysics, 5.2, trans. Ross, W. D., in The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, Jonathan, 2 vols. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984), 2.Google Scholar
Bacon, FrancisThe Works of Francis Bacon, ed. Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert L., and Heath, Douglas D., 14 vols. (London: Longmans, 1857–74), 4, I.Google Scholar
Bernard Cohen, I.The Birth of a New Physics, 2nd ed. (New York: W. W. Norton, 1985).Google Scholar
Boyle, A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Receiv’d Notion of Nature (London: Printed by H. Clark for John Taylor, 1686).Google Scholar
Boyle, RobertA Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things (London: Printed by H. C. for John Taylor, 1688).Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B.French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Caesar Scaliger, JuliusExotericarum exercitationum liber XV de subtilitate ad Hieronymum Cardanum [1557].Google Scholar
Conimbricense, CollegiumCommentarii… in duos libros De generatione et corruptione (Lyons: Buysson, 1600).Google Scholar
Conimbricense, CollegiumCommentarii… in octo libros Physicorum, 2 vols. (Lyons: Buysson, 1594).Google Scholar
Cook, Harold J. “The New Philosophy and Medicine in Seventeenth-Century England,” in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. Lindberg, David C. and Westman, Robert S. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian P. and Schmitt, Charles B.Renaissance Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Coulston Gillispie, CharlesThe Edge of Objectivity (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Croce Birch, Andrea “The Problem of Method in Newton’s Natural Philosophy,” in Nature and Scientific Method, ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 22) (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Park, KatharineWonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750 (New York: Zone Books, 1998).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Katharine, Park “Unnatural Conceptions: The Study of Monsters in Sixteenth-and Seventeenth-Century France and England,” Past and Present, 92 (1981).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine “Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity,” Annals of Scholarship, 8 (1991).Google Scholar
Des Chene, DennisPhysiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Descartes, RenéPrinciples of Philosophy, 1.24–8, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984–91), I.Google Scholar
Descartes, RenéOeuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul, 12 vols., rev. ed. (Paris: J. Vrin/CNRS, 1964–76).Google Scholar
Descartes, RenéPrinciples of Philosophy, trans. Miller, Valentine Rodger and Miller, Reese P. (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991).Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J.The Mechanization of the World Picture, trans. Dikshoorn, C. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Drake, StillmanGalileo at Work (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Edward Cranz, F.A Bibliography of Aristotle Editions, 1501–1600 (Bibliotheca Bibliographica Aureliana, 38) (Baden-Baden: Verlag Valentin Koerner, 1971).Google Scholar
Emerton, Norma E.The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Ferguson, John “The Margarita Philosophica of Gregorius Reisch: A Bibliography,” The Library, 10 (1929).Google Scholar
Galilei, GalileoLetters on Sunspots, excerpts translated in Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, ed. Drake, Stillman (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1957).Google Scholar
Galilei, GalileoDialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems – Ptolemaic and Copernican, trans. Drake, Stillman (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Galileo, , Two New Sciences, trans. Drake, Stillman (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Garber, DanielDescartes’ Metaphysical Physics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Grendler, Paul F.Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literacy and Learning, 1300–1600 (The John Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science, 107) (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Guerlac, Henri “Newton and the Method of Analysis,” in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, ed. Wiener, Philip P., 5 vols. (New York: Charles Scribners’ Sons, 1973–74), 3.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Niccolò “Analysis and Synthesis in Newton’s Mathematical Work,” in The Cambridge Companion to Newton, ed. Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Guiducci, Mario (and Galilei, Galileo), Discorso delle comete… [1619].Google Scholar
Hume, DavidA Treatise of Human Nature [1739–40], ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., rev. text by Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Jo Teeter Dobbs, BettyThe Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Laertius, DiogenesLives of Eminent Philosophers, Loeb Classical Library nos. 184–5, trans. Hicks, R. D., 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1925), 2.Google Scholar
Lear, JonathanAristotle: The Desire to Understand (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis Saunders, JasonJustus Lipsius: The Philosophy of Renaissance Stoicism (New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Lipsius, JustusManuductionis ad stoicam philosophiam libri iii [1604].Google Scholar
Lipsius, JustusOpera omnia, 4 vols. (Wesel, 1675), 4.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Locke, JohnAn Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 2.8.9 (4th rev. ed., London, 1700), ed. Nidditch, Peter H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Loux, Michael J.Primary Ousia (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Lucretius Carus, TitusOn the Nature of the Universe [De rerum natura], trans. Latham, R. E. and rev. Godwin, John (London: Penguin Books, 1994), bk. 2, II.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. “Force, Active Principles, and Newton’s Invisible Realm,” Ambix, 15 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. E. “Natural Motion and Its Causes: Newton on the ‘Vis Insita’ of Bodies,” in Self Motion: From Aristotle to Newton, ed. Gill, Mary Louise and Lennox, James G. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
McMullin, “The Impact of Newton’s Principia on the Philosophy of Science,” Philosophy of Science, 68 (2001).Google Scholar
McMullin, ErnanNewton on Matter and Activity (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Merchant, CarolynThe Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution (New York: Harper and Row, 1980).Google Scholar
Milton, John R. in his “Laws of Nature,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Murdoch, John E. “The Medieval and Renaissance Tradition of Minima Naturalia,” in Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, ed. Lüthy, Christoph, Murdoch, John E., and Newman, William R. (Leiden: Brill, 2001).Google Scholar
Newman, William R.Gehennical Fire: The Lives of George Starkey, an American Alchemist in the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Newton, IsaacIsaac Newton’s Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica, ed. Koyré, Alexandre and Cohen, I. Bernard, with Whitman, Anne, 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972), 2.Google Scholar
Newton, IsaacOpticks, 3.31 (4th ed., London, 1730; repr. New York: Dover Publications, 1979).Google Scholar
Newton, IsaacThe Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Newton, , Principia, (London, 1726).Google Scholar
Nicholas, Jardine “Epistemology of the Sciences,” in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Schmitt, Charles B., Skinner, Quentin, Kessler, Eckhard, and Kraye, Jill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Nifo, AgostinoExpositio super octo Aristotelis Stagiritae libros de physico auditu: Averrois… in eosdem libros proemium ac commentaria [1552], fols. 96v, 97v, 112r, 213r, translated in Emerton, , Scientific Reinterpretation of Form.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J.Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacius, JuliusAristotelis Naturalis auscultationis libri VIII [1596] (repr., Frankfurt: Minerva, 1964).Google Scholar
Pacius, JuliusAristotelis Peripateticorum principis organum [1597] (repr., Hildesheim: Geory Olms, 1967).Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramos, Antonio “Bacon’s Forms and the Maker’s Knowledge Tradition,” in The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, ed. Peltonen, Markku (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Reisch, GregorMargarita philosophica, 2.5, 3rd Basel ed., expanded by Oronce Finé (Basel: S. H. Petri, 1583).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B.Aristotle and the Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sennert, DanielOpera omnia, 4 vols. (Lyons: Hugetan and Ravaud, 1650), 3.Google Scholar
Suárez, FranciscoDisputationes metaphysicae (Salamanca: Joannes and Andreas Renault, 1597).Google Scholar
Suárez, FranciscoOn Efficient Causality: Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18, and 19, trans. Freddoso, Alfred J. (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Sumida Joy, LynnGassendi the Atomist, Advocate of History in an Age of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Wallace, William A.Causality and Scientific Explanation, 2 vols. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1972 and 1974), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Waterlow, SarahNature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wear, A.French, R. K., and Lonie, I. M., eds., The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S.Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Zabarella, Opera logica, col. 489, translated in Randall, John Herman Jr., The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1961).Google Scholar
Zabarella, JacopoDe rebus naturalibus libri XXX [1607] (repr., Frankfurt: Minerva, 1966).Google Scholar
Zabarella, JacopoOpera logica [1597] (repr. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1966).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×