Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:44:29.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Paleontology

from PART II - ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2009

By
Ronald Rainger
Edited by
Peter J. Bowler  and
John V. Pickstone
Peter J. Bowler
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
John V. Pickstone
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

The study of paleontology has long provided a rich field for historical analysis. Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, geologists and paleontologists played prominent, often highly visible roles in science and society, and an earlier generation of scholars devoted considerable attention to such individuals. Biographers, principally scientists, produced laudatory studies of such figures as Georges Cuvier (1769–1832), Roderick Impey Murchison (1792–1871), Richard Owen (1804–1892), and Othniel Charles Marsh (1832–1899). With the development of the history of science as a field in the 1960s and 1970s, scholars devoted their attention to other aspects of the subject. Emphasizing the importance of conceptual and methodological developments in science, historians defined the role that paleontologists had played in documenting the occurrence of extinction, determining the relative age of the earth, and contributing to evolutionary theory.

In more recent years, the increasing interest in understanding science in its social and cultural context has resulted in new and important studies. Focusing on major individuals and developments in the nineteenth century, these contextualized studies challenge the interpretations of an older historiography. In addition to examining the emergence of scientific communities, these analyses illustrate the ways in which social, political, and cultural factors shaped scientific careers and interpretations. The recent interest in scientific practice has fostered analyses of fieldwork and specimen collections. In addition, paleontology has become increasingly important from the perspective of the institutional and disciplinary dimensions of the science. As a field that straddles both the biological and geological sciences, paleontology and its practitioners did not fit easily into the increasingly specialized scientific institutions and infrastructures that began to emerge in the nineteenth century.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 185 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V., “Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction,” Science, 208 (1980);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appel, Toby A., The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades before Darwin (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987);Google Scholar
Bourdier, Franck, “Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire versus Cuvier: The Campaign for Paleontological Evolution (1825–1838),” in Toward a History of Geology, ed. Schneer, Cecil J. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969);Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., Fossils and Progress: Paleontology and the Idea of Progressive Evolution in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Science History Publications, 1976);Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolutionary Theories in the Decades around 1900 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983);Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., Life’s Splendid Drama: Evolutionary Biology and the Reconstruction of Life’s Ancestry, 1860–1940 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996);Google Scholar
Coleman, William, Georges Cuvier, Zoologist: A Study in the History of Evolution Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsi, Pietro, The Age of Lamarck: Evolutionary Theories in France, 1790–1830 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, Archetypes and Ancestors: Palaeontology in Victorian London, 1850–1875 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982);Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, Huxley: From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High Priest (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1997).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine and Reform in Radical London (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, “Designing the Dinosaur: Richard Owen’s Response to Robert Edward Grant,” Isis, 70 (1979);Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, Mario, T. H. Huxley’s Place in Nature (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984);Google Scholar
Diemer, John and Collie, Michael, “Murchison in Moray: A Geologist on Home Ground. With the Correspondence of Roderick Impey Murchison and the Rev. Dr. George Gordon of Birnie,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 85, pt. 3 (1995).Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles and Gould, Stephen Jay, “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism,” in Models in Paleobiology, ed. Schopf, T. J. M. (San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, 1972);Google Scholar
Gingerich, Philip D., “Paleontology and Phylogeny: Patterns of Evolution at the Species Level in Early Tertiary Mammals,” American Journal of Science, 276 (1976);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glen, William, “What the Impact/Volcanism/Mass Extinction Debates Are About” and “How Science Works in the Mass-Extinction Debates,” both in Mass Extinction Debates: How Science Works in a Crisis, ed. Glen, William (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1994), respectively.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay, “Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?” Paleobiology, 6 (1980);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay, “Is Uniformitarianism Necessary?” American Journal of Science, 263 (1965);Google Scholar
Hallam, Anthony, “End-Cretaceous Mass Extinction Event: Argument for Terrestrial Causation,” Science, 238 (1987);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haraway, Donna, Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science (New York: Routledge, 1989);Google Scholar
Harwood, Jonathan, Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900–1933 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Hoffman, Anthony, “Mass Extinctions: The View of a Sceptic,” Journal of the Geological Society, London, 146 (1989);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, M. King, “Critique of the Principle of Uniformity,” Geological Society of America Special Papers, 89 (1976);Google Scholar
Jablonski, David, “Background and Mass Extinctions: The Alternation of Macroevolutionary Regimes,” Science, 231 (1986);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jefferson, Thomas, “Notes on The State of Virginia,” in The Portable Thomas Jefferson, ed. Peterson, Merrill D. (New York: Penguin, 1975).Google Scholar
Karp, I. and Lavine, S. D., eds., Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991);Google Scholar
Kohler, Robert E. and Kuklick, Henrika, eds., “Science in the Field,” Osiris (2nd ser.), 11 (1996).Google Scholar
Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory, “Museums on Campus: A Tradition of Inquiry and Teaching,” in The American Development of Biology, ed. Rainger, Ronald, Benson, Keith R., and Maienschein, Jane (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988);Google Scholar
Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory, ed., The Origins of Natural Science in America: The Essays of George Brown Goode (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991);Google Scholar
Laporte, Léo F., “Simpson’s Tempo and Mode in Evolution Revisited,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 127 (1983).Google ScholarPubMed
Laporte, Léo F., “George G. Simpson, Paleontology, and the Expansion of Biology,” in The Expansion of American Biology, ed. Benson, Keith R., Maienschein, Jane, and Rainger, Ronald (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1991);Google Scholar
Laporte, Léo F., “Wrong for the Right Reasons: George Gaylord Simpson and Continental Drift,” Geological Society of America Centennial Special Volume, 1 (1985).Google Scholar
Laudan, Rachel, From Mineralogy to Geology: The Foundations of a Science, 1650–1830 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lurie, Edward, Louis Agassiz: A Life in Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Newell, Norman D. and Colbert, Edwin H., “Paleontologist – Biologist or Geologist?” Journal of Paleontology, 22 (1948);Google Scholar
Newell, Norman D., “Infraspecific Categories in Invertebrate Paleontology,” Evolution, 1 (1947);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, Norman D., “Toward a More Ample Invertebrate Paleontology,” Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 112 (1954);Google Scholar
Newell, Norman D., “Paleobiology’s Golden Age,” Palaios, 2 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhart, Lynn K., Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Oldroyd, David R., The Highlands Controversy: Constructing Geological Knowledge through Fieldwork in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990);Google Scholar
Orocz, Joel J., Curators and Culture: The Museum Movement in America, 1740–1870 (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1990);Google Scholar
Ospovat, Dov, The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838–1859 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981);Google Scholar
Ospovat, Dov, “The Influence of Karl Ernst von Baer’s Embryology, 1828–1859: A Reappraisal in Light of Richard Owen’s and William B. Carpenter’s ‘Palaeontological Application of von Baer’s Law’,” Journal of the History of Biology, 9 (1976).Google Scholar
Outram, Dorinda, Georges Cuvier: Vocation, Science and Authority in Post-Revolutionary France (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, “The Continuation of the Morphological Tradition: American Paleontology, 1880–1910,” Journal of the History of Biology, 14 (1981).Google Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, An Agenda for Antiquity: Henry Fairfield Osborn and Vertebrate Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History, 1890–1935 (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1991);Google Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, “The Rise and Decline of a Science: Vertebrate Paleontology at Philadelphia’s Academy of Natural Sciences, 1820–1900,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 136 (1992);Google Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, “Everett C. Olson and the Development of Vertebrate Paleoecology and Taphonomy,” Archives of Natural History, 24 (1997);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, “Biology, Geology or Neither or Both: Vertebrate Paleontology at the University of Chicago, 1892–1950,” Perspectives on Science, 1 (1993).Google Scholar
Raup, David M. and Crick, R. E., “Evolution of Single Characters in the Jurassic Ammonite Kosmoceras,” Paleobiology, 7 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, David M. and Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., “Periodicity of Mass Extinctions in the Geological Past,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 81 (1984);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehbock, Philip F., The Philosophical Naturalists: Themes in Early Nineteenth-Century British Biology (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983);Google Scholar
Reif, Wolf-Ernst, “The Search for a Macroevolutionary Theory in German Paleontology,” Journal of the History of Biology, 19 (1986).Google Scholar
Rudwick, , Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S., The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in the History of Palaeontology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972);Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S., The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Science among Gentlemanly Specialists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas A., Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994);Google Scholar
Schneer, Cecil J., “The Great Taconic Controversy,” Isis, 69 (1978);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuchert, Charles and LeVene, Clara Mae, O. C. Marsh: Pioneer in Paleontology (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Secord, James A., Controversy in Victorian Geology: The Cambrian-Silurian Dispute (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Sellers, Charles Coleman, Mr. Peale’s Museum: Charles Willson Peale and the First Popular Museum of Natural Science and Art (New York: Norton, 1980);Google Scholar
Sheets-Pyenson, Susan, Cathedrals of Science: The Development of Colonial Natural History Museums in the Late Nineteenth Century (Montreal: Mc Gill–Queens University Press, 1989);Google Scholar
Shor, Elizabeth Noble, The Fossil Feud between E. D. Cope and O. C. Marsh (Hicksville, N.Y.: Exposition, 1974).Google Scholar
Simpson, George Gaylord, Tempo and Mode in Evolution (New York: Columbia University Press, 1944);Google Scholar
Sloan, R. E., Rigby, J. K., Van Valen, L. M., and Gabriel, D., “Gradual Dinosaur Extinction and Simultaneous Ungulate Radiation in the Hell Creek Formation,” Science, 232 (1986).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somit, Albert and Peterson, Steven A., eds., The Dynamics of Evolution: The Punctuated Equilibrium Debate in the Natural and Social Sciences (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Stanley, Steven W., “A Theory of Evolution Above the Species Level,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 72 (1975);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Star, Susan Leigh and Griesemer, James R., “Institutional Ecology, “Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39,” Social Studies of Science, 19 (1989);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todes, Daniel P., “V. O. Kovalevskii: The Genesis, Content, and Reception of His Paleontological Work,” Studies in History of Biology, 2 (1978).Google Scholar
Vergo, Peter, ed., The New Museology (London: Reaktion, 1991);Google Scholar
Weller, J. Marvin, “Relations of the Invertebrate Paleontologist to Geology,” Journal of Paleontology, 21 (1947);Google Scholar
Winsor, Mary P., Reading the Shape of Nature: Comparative Zoology at the Agassiz Museum (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991);CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×