Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- PART I WORKERS AND PLACES
- PART II ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION
- 10 Geology
- 11 Paleontology
- 12 Zoology
- 13 Botany
- 14 Evolution
- 15 Anatomy, Histology, and Cytology
- 16 Embryology
- 17 Microbiology
- 18 Physiology
- 19 Pathology
- PART III NEW OBJECTS AND IDEAS
- PART IV SCIENCE AND CULTURE
- Index
- References
17 - Microbiology
from PART II - ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- PART I WORKERS AND PLACES
- PART II ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION
- 10 Geology
- 11 Paleontology
- 12 Zoology
- 13 Botany
- 14 Evolution
- 15 Anatomy, Histology, and Cytology
- 16 Embryology
- 17 Microbiology
- 18 Physiology
- 19 Pathology
- PART III NEW OBJECTS AND IDEAS
- PART IV SCIENCE AND CULTURE
- Index
- References
Summary
The only constant characteristics of a research area that we can, anachronistically, describe as microbiology might be the minute size of the organisms it studies and its reliance on instruments and a set of techniques that allow us to see beyond the range of what is visible to the naked eye. Stability or continuity are difficult to find elsewhere – either in the range and classification of microorganisms, in the types of questions asked about them, in the theoretical or practical goals of research, in the institutions in which investigations were conducted, or in the composition of the group of scientists to whom these microscopic organisms were of interest.
The range of organisms encompassed by these investigations has changed many times during the last two centuries. Relatively undifferentiated infusoria gave place to protists and schizomycetes, and later to protozoa, bacteria, fungi, and algae; the invisible filterable viruses, obligate parasites, and lytic principles appeared only temporarily, to be replaced by rickettsia and viruses. These microorganisms were investigated by a heterogeneous assembly of amateurs, botanists, zoologists, biologists, pathologists, biochemists, geneticists, medical doctors, sanitary engineers, agricultural scientists, veterinarians, public health investigators, biotechnologists, and so on. Specialisms and disciplines devoted to specific groups of microorganisms – bacteriology, virology, protozoology, and mycology – have disparate though often overlapping institutional and intellectual histories, and although the term “microbiology” dates from the last decades of the nineteenth century, it did not come to designate a discipline that could claim its own sphere of concern until after the Second World War.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 316 - 341Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, “The Discourse of Physical Power and Biological Knowledge in the 1930s: A Reappraisal of the Rockefeller Foundation’s Policy in Molecular Biology,” Social Studies of Science, 12 (1982);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “From Multi-disciplinary Collaboration to Transnational Objectivity: International Space as Constitutive of Molecular Biology, 1930–1970,” in Denationalizing Science: The International Context of Scientific Practice, ed. , , and (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993).Google Scholar
, “Medical and Biological Constraints: Early Research on Variation in Bacteriology,” Social Studies of Science, 17 (1987).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Beneficent Microbes: The Delft School of Microbiology and Its Industrial Connections,” in Beijerinck and the Delft School of Microbiology, ed. and (Delft: Delft University Press, 1995);Google Scholar
, “Stabilizing Instability: The Controversies over Cyclogenic Theories of Bacterial Variation during the Interwar Period,” Journal of the History of Biology, 24 (1991);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “From Pneumonia to DNA: The Research Career of Oswald T. Avery,” Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Sciences, 24 (1993);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Robert Koch: A Life in Medicine and Bacteriology (Madison, Wis.: Science Tech, 1988);Google Scholar
, The Emergence of Bacterial Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1990);Google Scholar
, “The Zymotechnic Roots of Biotechnology,” British Journal of the History of Science, 25 (1992);Google Scholar
, The Uses of Life: A History of Biotechnology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
, , and , eds., Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology (Cold Spring Harber, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1966).Google Scholar
, “The Development of Pasteur’s Concept of Disease Causation and the Emergence of Specific Causes in Nineteenth Century Medicine,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 65 (1991).Google ScholarPubMed
, “The Koch-Pasteur Debate on Establishing the Cause of Anthrax,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 62 (1988);Google Scholar
, “Ignaz Semmelweis, Carl Mayrhoffer, and the Rise of Germ Theory,” Medical History, 29 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Koch’s Postulates in Relation to the Work of Jacob Henle and Edwin Klebs,” Medical History, 29 (1985).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “The Guts of the Matter – Infusoria from Ehrenberg to Bütschli: 1838–1876,” Journal of the History of Biology, 22 (1989).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Koch’s Comma Bacillus: The First Year,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 61 (1987);Google ScholarPubMed
, “Pasteur’s Study of Fermentation,” in Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1957), vol. 2.Google Scholar
, “Professor Herbert William Conn and the Founding of the Society,” Bacteriological Reviews, 12 (1948), at p. 287.Google Scholar
, “From the Soil to Scientific Discovery: René Dubos and the Ecological Model for Microbial Investigation, 1924–1939,” paper presented at the meeting of the History of Science Society, Atlanta, Georgia, November 1996.
, The History of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 1964);Google Scholar
, The Professor, the Institute and DNA (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 1976);Google Scholar
, Pasteur: The History of a Mind, trans. Erwin F. Smith and Florence Hedges (Philadelphia: Saunders, 1920);Google Scholar
, The Spontaneous Generation Controversy from Descartes to Oparin (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), p..Google Scholar
and , “Science, Politics and Spontaneous Generation in Nineteenth Century France: The Pasteur-Pouchet Debate,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 48 (1974);Google ScholarPubMed
, The Private Science of Louis Pasteur (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
, “Lawson Tait and Opposition to Germ Theory: Defining Science in Surgical Practice,” Journal of the History of Medicine and the Allied Sciences, 53 (1998);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Science of Impurity: Water Analysis in Nineteenth Century Britain (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).Google Scholar
, “On the Cusp: Epidemiology and Bacteriology at the Local Government Board, 1890–1905,” Medical History, 42 (1998);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “From Unit to Unity: Protozoology, Cell Theory, and the New Concept of Life,” Journal of the History of Biology, 22 (1989).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and , eds., Albert Jan Kluyver: His Life and Work (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1959).Google Scholar
, The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
, “Laboratory Technology and Biological Knowledge: The Tiselius Electrophoresis Apparatus, 1930–1945,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 10 (1988).Google ScholarPubMed
, “Conceptual Models and Analytical Tools: The Biology of Physicist Max Delbrück,” Journal of the History of Biology, 18 (1985);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Selling Pure Science in Wartime: The Biochemical Genetics of G. W. Beadle,” Journal of the History of Biology, 2 (1989).Google Scholar
, “The Management of Science: The Experience of Warren Weaver and the Rockefeller Foundation Program in Molecular Biology,” Minerva, 14 (1976);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Background to Edouard Buchner’s Discovery of Cell-Free Fermentation,” Journal of the History of Biology, 4 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Bacterial Physiology: The Medical Context,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 59 (1985).Google ScholarPubMed
, “Systems of Production: Drosophila, Neurospora, and Biochemical Genetics,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 22 (1991);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “From Guinea Pigs to Man: The Development of Haffkine’s Anticholera Vaccine,” Journal of the History of Medicine and the Allied Sciences, 47 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “On Hybridizations, Networks, and New Disciplines: The Pasteur Institute and the Development of Microbiology in France,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 25 (1994), at p. 670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Variances of Meaning in Discovery Accounts: The Case of Contemporary Biology,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 21 (1990).Google ScholarPubMed
and , “Practicing on Principle: Joseph Lister and the Germ Theories of Disease,” in Medical Theory, Surgical Practice: Studies in the History of Surgery, ed. (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
, “Forty Years of Genetic Recombination in Bacteria,” Nature, 324 (1986);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Genetic Recombination in Bacteria: A Discovery Account,” Annual Review of Genetics, 21 (1987).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “‘Physician vs. Bacteriologist’: The Ideology of Science in Clinical Medicine,” in The Therapeutic Revolution: Essays in the Social History of American Medicine, ed. and (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1979);Google Scholar
, “Pathologists, Clinicians, and the Role of Pathophysiology,” in Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940, ed. (Bethesda, Md.: American Physiological Society, 1987).Google Scholar
, Species and Specificity: An Interpretation of the History of Immunology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
, The Transforming Principle: Discovering that Genes Are Made of DNA (New York: Norton, 1985);Google Scholar
, “Contribution à la connaissance des relations entre Koch et Pasteur,” Schriftenreihe für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, 20 (1983).Google Scholar
, “Pure Science and Applied Medicine: The Relationship between Bacteriology and Biochemistry in England after 1880,” Society for Social History of Medicine Bulletin, 37 (1985).Google ScholarPubMed
, Cholera, Fever and English Medicine, 1825–1865 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978);Google Scholar
, “Contagion/Germ Theory/Specificity,” in Companion Encyclopedia to the History of Medicine, ed. and , 2 vols. (London: Routledge, 1997), vol. 1;Google Scholar
, Picture Control: The Electron Microscope and the Transformation of Biology in America, 1940–1960 (Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1997), especially chaps. 2 and 5.Google Scholar
, “Protozoa as Precursors of Metazoa: German Cell Theory and Its Critics at the Turn of the Century,” Journal of the History of Biology, 22 (1989).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “Experimental Method and Spontaneous Generation: The Controversy between Pasteur and Pouchet, 1859–64,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 34 (1979).Google Scholar
, “The Cattle Plague of 1865 and the Reception of ‘The Germ Theory’ in Mid-Victorian Britain,” Journal of the History of Medicine and the Allied Sciences, 52 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Rationalization and Reality in Shaping American Agricultural Research, 1875–1914,” in The Sciences in the American Context: New Perspectives, ed. (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1979);Google Scholar
, “The Adams Act: Politics and the Cause of Scientific Research,” in , No Other Gods: On Science and American Social Thought (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1961);Google Scholar
, “The Organization of the Agricultural Sciences,” in The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860–1920, ed. and (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
, “Swimming against the Tide: Adrianus Pijper and the Debate over Bacterial Flagella, 1946–1956,” Isis, 87 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “From Culture as Organism to Organism as Cell: Historical Origins of Bacterial Genetics,” Journal of the History of Biology, 24 (1991).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “A Historical Analysis of the Concept of Infection,” in Owsei Temkin, The Double Face of Janus and Other Essays in the History of Medicine (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
, “The Beginnings of the ‘Delft Tradition’; Revisited: Martinus W. Beijerinck and the Genetics of Microorganisms,” Journal of the History of Biology, 29 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Introduction to Special Issue on Rethinking the Reception of the Germ Theory of Disease: Comparative Perspectives,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 52 (1997);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, The Gospel of Germs: Men, Women, and the Microbe in American Life (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998), p..Google Scholar
, “American Attitudes towards the Germ Theory of Disease: Phyllis Allen Richmond Revisited,” Journal of the History of Medicine and the Allied Sciences, 52 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “ABacteriological Paradigm in Influenza Research in the First Half of the Twentieth Century,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 15 (1993).Google ScholarPubMed
, , and , Martinus Willem Beijerinck: His Life and Work (orig., 1940; repr. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Science Tech, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Microbiology and the Spontaneous Generation Debate during the 1870’s (Lawrence, Kans.: Coronado Press, 1971).Google Scholar
, “Pus, Sewage, Beer, and Milk: Microbiology in Britain, 1870–1940,” History of Science, 28 (1990);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Sergei Winogradsky, His Life and Work (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
and , An Introduction to the History of Virology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
, “Scientific Elites and Laboratory Organisation in fin de siècle Paris and Berlin: The Pasteur Institute and Robert Koch’s Institute for Infectious Diseases Compared,” in The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
, Spreading Germs: Disease Theories and Medical Practice in Britain, 1865–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
, “Treatments for Pneumonia in Britain, 1910–1940,” in Medicine and Change: Historical and Sociology Studies of Medical Innovation, ed. et al. (Paris: Libbey, 1993);Google Scholar
, “The Emergence of Tropical Medicine,” in Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, ed. et al. (The Hague: Mouton, 1976).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by