Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:37:48.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - The Mechanical Arts

from Part III - Dividing the Study of Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Katharine Park
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Lorraine Daston
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin
Get access

Summary

In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the term “mechanical” had three main senses – all interconnected and all relevant to the history of science. The traditional meaning referred to activities that were practical or manual. In the sixteenth century, the word acquired a new meaning, a revival of a classical sense, connecting it specifically to machines and their design and management. Finally, in the seventeenth century, “mechanical” came also to refer to a doctrine about the natural world. The phrase “mechanical arts” – artes mechanicae in postclassical Latin – had equivalents in a number of European languages. When linked to the first two of these senses, it referred to the skillful practice of a particular practical discipline or handicraft, including the working of machines.

The disciplinary relationships and boundaries observed in the activities and writings of contemporary practitioners of the mechanical arts confirm the relationship of machinery to a wider context of practical work. They also show the importance, increasing over the course of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, of bringing mathematics into the characterization of the “mechanical.” This is both because the design and management of machines came to be regarded as a mathematical art and because mathematics became engaged in a range of other practical work. It would be difficult and anachronistic, for example, to define a boundary between the mechanical arts and practical mathematics, as carried on by people we might more readily call “mathematical practitioners” than mechanicians or mechanics, as the practical mathematical disciplines, such as architecture, engineering, gunnery, and surveying (often referred to in English as “the mathematicals”), were directly concerned with machines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apian, Peter, Folium populi (Ingolstadt, 1533).Google Scholar
Arnold Brown, Lloyd, The Story of Maps (New York: Dover, 1979).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, The Advancement of Learning, in The Works of Francis Bacon, ed. Montagu, Basil, 16 vols. (London: William Pickering, 1825–34), 2.Google Scholar
Bagrow, Leo, History of Cartography, revised by Skelton, R. A. (London: C. A. Watts, 1964).Google Scholar
Bedini, Silvio A., The Pulse of Time (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1991).Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim and Johnston, Stephen, The Geometry of War, 1500–1750 (Oxford: Museum of the History of Science, 1996).Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim, “Cosimo’s Cosmography: The Palazzo Vecchio and the History of Museums,” in Musa Musaei: Studies on Scientific Instruments and Collections in Honour of Mara Miniati, ed. Beretta, M., Galluzzi, P., and Triarico, C. (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2003).Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim, “Geometry and Surveying in Early-Seventeenth-Century England,” Annals of Science, 48 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jim, “Geometry in Context in the Sixteenth Century: The View from the Museum,” Early Science and Medicine, 8 (2002).Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim, “Projection and the Ubiquitous Virtue of Geometry in the Renaissance,” in Making Space for Science: Territorial Themes in the Shaping of Knowledge, ed. Smith, C. and Agar, J. (London: Macmillan, 1998).Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim, “The Mechanics’s Philosophy and the Mechanical Philosophy,” History of Science, 24 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jim, The Divided Circle: A History of Instruments for Astronomy, Navigation, and Surveying (Oxford: Phaidon Christie’s, 1987).Google Scholar
Borough, William, A Discours of the Variation of the Cumpas, or Magneticall Needle (London: Jhon Kyngston for Richard Ballard, 1581).Google Scholar
Bramer, Benjamin, Bericht zu Jobsten Burgi seligen geometrischen triangular Instruments (Kassel: Jacob Gentsch, 1648).Google Scholar
Davis, John, The Seamans Secrets (London: Thomas Dawson, 1595).Google Scholar
Digges, Thomas, A Geometrical Practical Treatise Named Pantometria… (London: Abell Jeffres, 1591).Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman, Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography (New York: Dover, 1995).Google Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel Y., The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective (New York: Basic Books, 1975).Google Scholar
Euclid, , The Elements of Geometrie of the Most Auncient Philosopher Euclide of Megara, trans Billingsley, H. (London: John Daye, 1570).Google Scholar
Frisius, Gemma, De astrolabo catholico liber (Antwerp, 1556).Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, “Between Ars and Philosophia naturalis: Reflections on the Historiography of Early Modern Mechanics,” in Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen, and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, ed. , Judith V. Field and , Frank A. J. L. James (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno à due nuoue scienze attenenti alla mecanica & i movimenti locali (Leiden: Elsevier, 1638).Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Sidereus Nuncius; or, the Sidereal Messenger, trans. Helden, Albert (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galluzzi, Paolo, “Art and Artifice in the Depiction of Renaissance Machines,” in The Power of Images in Early Modern Science, ed. Lefèvre, Wolfgang, Renn, Jürgen, and Schoepflin, Urs (Basel: Birkhäuser, 2003).Google Scholar
Galluzzi, Paolo, Renaissance Engineers from Brunelleschi to Leonardo da Vinci (Florence: Giunti, 1996).Google Scholar
Gilbert, William, De magnete, magneticisque corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure (London: Petrus Short, 1600)Google Scholar
Gouk, Penelope, The Ivory Sundials of Nuremberg, 1500–1700 (Cambridge: Whipple Museum, 1988)Google Scholar
Gunter, Edmund, De sectore et radio (London: William Jones, 1623).Google Scholar
Harvey, P. D. A.Maps in Tudor England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L., The Sun in the Church: Cathedrals as Solar Observatories (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Higton, H., Sundials at Greenwich (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, Micrographia; or, Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies with Observations and Enquiries Thereupon (London: J. Martyn and J. Allestry, 1665).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johann, Stöffler, Elucidatio fabricae ususque astrolabii (Oppenheim: J. Köbel, 1513).Google Scholar
John Turner, Anthony, Astrolabes: Astrolabe Related Instruments (The Time Museum, vol. 1, pt. 1) (Rockford, Ill.: The Time Museum, 1985).Google Scholar
John Turner, Anthony, Early Scientific Instruments, Europe 1400–1800 (London: Sotheby’s, 1987).Google Scholar
Keller, A. G.Renaissance Theaters of Machines,” Technology and Culture, 19 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, Martin, The Science of Art (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
King, H. C. and Millburn, J. R., Geared to the Stars: The Evolution of Planetariums, Orreries and Astronomical Clocks (Bristol: Adam Hilger, 1978), esp. chap. 3.Google Scholar
L’Estrange Turner, Gerard, Elizabethan Instrument Makers: The Origins of the London Trade in Precision Instrument Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Long, Pamela O., Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael S., “The Measurement of Time and Longitude at Sea,” in Studies on Christiaan Huygens, ed. Bos, H. J. M., Rudwick, M. J. S., Snelders, H. A. M., and Visser, R. P. W. (Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger, 1980).Google Scholar
Maurice, Klaus, “Jost Bürgi, or On Innovation,” in The Clockwork Universe: German Clocks and Automata, 1550–1650, ed. Maurice, Klaus and Otto, Mayr (New York: Neale Watson, 1980).Google Scholar
Newton, Issac, Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (London: Royal Society and Joseph Streater, 1687).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niccolò, Tartaglia, La nova scientia (Venice, 1537)Google Scholar
Norman, Robert, The Newe Attractive (London: Jhon Kyngston for Richard Ballard, 1581).Google Scholar
Oughtred, W., The Circles of Proportion and the Horizontal Instrument (London: Augustine Mathewes for Elias Allen, 1632).Google Scholar
Rathborne, Aaron, The Surveyor (London: W. Stansby for W. Barre, 1616).Google Scholar
Robert Boyle, Compare, Experiments, Notes &c. about the Mechanical Origine or Production of Divers Particular Qualities (London: E. Flesher for R. Davis, 1676).Google Scholar
Robert Boyle, Compare, New Experiments Physico-Mechanicall, Touching the Spring of the Air (Oxford: H. Hall for Thomas Robinson, 1660).Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo, Philosophy, Technology, and the Arts in the Early Modern Era, trans. Attanasio, Salvator (New York: Harper and Row, 1970)Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Symonds, Robert W., Thomas Tompion, His Life and Work (London: Spring Books, 1969).Google Scholar
Taylor, E. G. R.The Haven-Finding Art (London: Institute of Navigation, 1956).Google Scholar
Taylor, E. G. R.The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge: Institute of Navigation, 1970).Google Scholar
Taylor, E. G. R.Tudor Geography, 1485–1583 (London: Methuen, 1930).Google Scholar
van Helden, Albert, “The Invention of the Telescope,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 67 (1977), pt. 4.Google Scholar
Veltman, Kim H., with Keele, Kenneth D., Linear Perspective and the Visual Dimensions of Science and Art (Munich: Kunstverlag, 1986).Google Scholar
Waters, D. W.The Art of Navigation in England in Elizabethan and Early Stuart Times (London: Hollis and Carter, 1958).Google Scholar
Wright, M.Robert Hooke’s Longitude Timekeeper,” in Robert Hooke: New Studies, ed. Hunter, Michael and Schaffer, Simon (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Yoder, J. G.Unrolling Time: Christiaan Huygens and the Mathematization of Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Mechanical Arts
  • Edited by Katharine Park, Harvard University, Massachusetts, Lorraine Daston, Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572446.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Mechanical Arts
  • Edited by Katharine Park, Harvard University, Massachusetts, Lorraine Daston, Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572446.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Mechanical Arts
  • Edited by Katharine Park, Harvard University, Massachusetts, Lorraine Daston, Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572446.028
Available formats
×