Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:46:10.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Meanings of Experience

from Part I - The New Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Peter Dear
Edited by
Katharine Park  and
Lorraine Daston
Katharine Park
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Lorraine Daston
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin
Get access

Summary

The categories of “experience” and “experiment” lay at the heart of the conceptions of natural knowledge that dominated European learning at both the beginning and the end of the Scientific Revolution. The Latin words generally used to denote “experience” in both the medieval and early modern periods, experientia and experimentum, were generally interchangeable, with no systematic distinction between them except in particular contexts to be discussed; both are related to the word peritus, meaning skilled or experienced. Besides these terms and their vernacular cognates, another related Latin term, periculum (“trial” or “test”), began to be used in the late sixteenth century to designate the deliberate carrying out of an experiment (periculum facere), initially in the mathematical sciences. By the end of the seventeenth century, the construal of experience as “experiment” in this sense had acquired a wide and influential currency.

At the start of the sixteenth century, scholastic versions of Aristotelian natural philosophy dominated the approach to knowledge of nature that informed the official curricula of the universities (see the following chapters in this volume: Blair, Chapter 17; Garber, Chapter 2); Aristotle’s writings stress repeatedly the importance of sense experience in the creation of reliable knowledge of the world. Nonetheless, during the seventeenth century, many of the proponents of what came to be called by some (rather obscurely) “the new science” criticized the earlier orthodoxy of what Aristotelian natural philosophy (or “physics”) had become on the grounds that it paid insufficient attention to the lessons of experience. For example, Francis Bacon (1561–1626) wrote in his New Organon of 1620 that Aristotle “did not properly consult experience… after making his decisions arbitrarily, he parades experience around, distorted to suit his opinions, a captive.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 106 - 131
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, Hans, From Locke to Saussure (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Agrimi, Jole and Chiara, Crisciani, “Per una ricerca su experimentum-experimenta: Riflessione epistemologica e tradizione medica (secolo XIII–XV),” in Presenza del lessico greco e latino nelle lingue contemporanee, ed. Janni, Pietro and Mazzini, Innocenza (Macerata: Università degli Studi di Macerata, 1990).Google Scholar
Alan, E. Shapiro, Fits, Passions, and Paroxysms: Physics, Method, and Chemistry and Newton’s Theories of Colored Bodies and Fits of Easy Reflection (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Andrew, Wear, French, R. K., and Lonie, I. M., eds., The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. Barnes, Jonathan (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Arthur Burtt, Edwin, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science: A Historical and Critical Essay (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday [Anchor Books], 1954)Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, The New Organon, 1.8, ed. and trans. Jardine, Lisa and Silverthorne, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, , Of the Proficiencie and Advancement of Learning (London: Henrie Tomes, 1605).Google Scholar
Bacon, RogerOpus Majus, ed. Bridges, John Henry (1897–1900; facsimile repr. Frankfurt am Main: Minerva, 1964)Google Scholar
Baldini, Ugo, Legem impone subactis: Studi su filosofia e scienza dei Gesuiti in Italia, 1540–1632 (Rome: Bulzoni, 1992), chap. 1.Google Scholar
Baroncini, Gabriele, Forme di esperienza e rivoluzione scientifica (Bibliotheca di Nuncius, Studi e testi IX) (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1992)Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, Lectiones mathematicae (1683), reprinted in The Mathematical Works of Isaac Barrow, D.D., ed. Whewell, William (Cambridge, 1860; facsimile repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1973).Google Scholar
Bechler, Zev, “Newton’s 1672 Optical Controversies: A Study in the Grammar of Scientific Dissent,” in The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy, ed. Elkana, Yehuda (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Ben-Chaim, Michael, “The Value of Facts in Boyle’s Experimental Philosophy,” History of Science, 38 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario, “The Social Status of Italian Mathematicians, 1450–1600,” History of Science, 27 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario, Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), chap. 4.Google Scholar
Boas Hall, Marie, Promoting Experimental Learning: Experiment and the Royal Society, 1660–1727 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B.French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Cultural History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Chauvin, Étienne, Lexicon Philosophicum (Leeuwarden, 1713; facsimile repr. Düsseldorf: Stern-Verlag Janssen, 1967).Google Scholar
Clarke, Desmond, Descartes’ Philosophy of Science (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Clavius, Christoph, “In sphaeram Ioannis de Sacro Bosco commentarius,” in Clavius, , Opera mathematica, 5 vols. in 4 (Mainz: A. Hierat for R. Eltz, 1611–12)Google Scholar
Clavius, Christoph, Ptolemy’s Almagest, trans. Toomer, G. J. (London: Duckworth, 1984).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard, The Newtonian Revolution: With Illustrations of the Transformation of Scientific Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), chap. 3.Google Scholar
Cook, Harold J., “The New Philosophy and Medicine in Seventeenth Century England,” in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. Lindberg, David C. and Westman, Robert S. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Cook, , “The Cutting Edge of a Revolution? Medicine and Natural History Near the Shores of the North Sea,” in Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen, and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, ed. Field, J. V. and James, Frank A. J. L. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Cranefield, Paul, “On the Origins of the Phrase Nihil est in intellectu quod non prius fuerit in sensu,” Journal of the History of Medicine, 25 (1970).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Katharine, Park, Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750 (New York: Zone Books, 1998), esp. chap. 5Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, “Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity,” Annals of Scholarship, 8 (1991).Google Scholar
Dear, Peter, Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, Peter, Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Dee, John, The Mathematicall Preface to the Elements of Geometrie of Euclide of Megara, intro. Debus, Allen G. (1570; facsimile repr. New York: Science History Publications, 1975).Google Scholar
Descartes, , Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul, 8 vols. (Paris: J. Vrin, 1964–76).Google Scholar
Eamon, WilliamScience and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K., “Classical Empiricism,” in The Methodological Heritage of Newton, ed. Butts, Robert E. and Davis, John W. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula, Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).Google Scholar
French, Roger, William Harvey’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, Michael, Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Discourses and Demonstrations Concerning Two New Sciences, trans. Drake, Stillman (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel, “Descartes and Experiment in the Discourse and the Essays,” in Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes, ed. Voss, Stephen (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel, “Experiment, Community, and the Constitution of Nature in the Seventeenth Century,” Perspectives on Science, 3 (1995)Google Scholar
Garber, , Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), chap. 2Google Scholar
Grant, Edward, “Ways to Interpret the Terms ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Aristotelianism’ in Medieval and Renaissance Natural Philosophy,” History of Science, 25 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerlac, Henry, “Newton and the Method of Analysis,” in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, ed. Wiener, P. P., 5 vols. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
Hahn, Roger, The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), chap. 1.Google Scholar
Hanafi, Zakiya, The Monster in the Machine: Magic, Medicine, and the Marvelous in the Time of the Scientific Revolution (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, Thomas L. and Robert, J. Silverman, Instruments and the Imagination (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Harvey, William, “A Second Essay to Jean Riolan,” in Harvey, , The Circulation of the Blood and Other Writings, trans. Franklin, Kenneth J. (London: Dent/Everyman’s Library, 1963).Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L., Physics at the Royal Society During Newton’s Presidency (Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1983)Google Scholar
Holmes, Frederic L., Eighteenth-Century Chemistry as an Investigative Enterprise (Berkeley: Office for History of Science and Technology, University of California at Berkeley, 1989)Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas, “Epistemology of the Sciences,” in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Schmitt, Charles B., Quentin, Skinner, and Kessler, Eckhard with Kraye, Jill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Knowles Middleton, W. E., The Experimenters: A Study of the Accademia del Cimento (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre, “A Documentary History of the Problem of Fall from Kepler to Newton: De motu gravium naturaliter cadentium in hypothesi terrae motae,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s. 45 (1955), pt. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko, The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian, “The Crystallization of a New Narrative Form in Experimental Reports (1660–1690): Experimental Evidence as a Transaction Between Philosophical Knowledge and Aristocratic Power,” Science in Context, 7 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian, La formation de la pratique scientifique: Le discours de l’expérience en France et en Angleterre (1630–1820) (Paris: Éditions de la Découverte, 1996), chap. 1.Google Scholar
Lindroth, Sten, “The Two Faces of Linnaeus,” in Linnaeus: The Man and His Work, ed. Frängsmyr, Tore (Canton, Mass.: Science History Publications, 1994).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. “Experiment in Early Greek Philosophy and Medicine,” in Lloyd, G. E. R., Methods and Problems in Greek Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. “Introduction,” in Hippocratic Writings, ed. Lloyd, G. E. R. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), chap. 2.Google Scholar
Martin, Julian, Francis Bacon, the State, and the Reform of Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
McKirahan, Richard D., Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Meier Reeds, Karen, Botany in Medieval and Renaissance Universities (New York: Garland, 1991)Google Scholar
Newman, William R., “Art, Nature, and Experiment among some Aristotelian Alchemists,” in Texts and Contexts in Ancient and Medieval Science: Studies on the Occasion of John E. Murdoch’s Seventieth Birthday, ed. Sylla, Edith and McVaugh, Michael (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, “New Theory about Light and Colours,” Philosophical Transactions, 6 (1672).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Opticks [4th ed., 1730] (New York: Dover, 1952).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, The Optical Papers of Isaac Newton, Vol. I: The Optical Lectures, 1670–72, ed. Shapiro, Alan E. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Niccolò, Cabeo, In quatuor libros Meteorologicorum Aristotelis commentaria (Rome: Francisco Corbeletti, 1646).Google Scholar
O’Malley, C. D.Andreas Vesalius of Brussels, 1514–1564 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Pagel, WalterParacelsus: An Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of the Renaissance, 2nd rev. ed. (Basel: Karger, 1982)Google Scholar
Pesic, Peter, “Wrestling with Proteus: Francis Bacon and the ‘Torture’ of Nature,” Isis, 90 (1999).Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary, A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), esp. chaps. 1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H., The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Pumfrey, Stephen “The History of Science and the Renaissance Science of History,” in Science, Culture, and Popular Belief in Renaissance Europe, ed. Pumfrey, Stephen, Rossi, Paolo L., and Slawinski, Maurice (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, The Understanding of the Fossil Past: Paleontology and Evolution Theory, 1850–1910 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Reeds, , “Renaissance Humanism and Botany,” Annals of Science, 33 (1976).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risnerus, Federicus, ed., Opticae thesaurus: Alhazeni arabis libri septem, nunc primum editi… (Basel: per Episcopios, 1572).Google Scholar
Russell Hanson, Norwood, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958)Google Scholar
Salmone, Mario, ed., Ratio atque institutio studiorum Societatis Jesu: L’ordinamento scolastico dei collegi dei Gesuiti (Milan: Feltrinelli, 1979).Google Scholar
Scarborough, John, Roman Medicine (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, “Glass Works: Newton’s Prisms and the Uses of Experiment,” in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences, ed. Gooding, David, Pinch, Trevor, and Schaffer, Simon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B., “Experience and Experiment: A Comparison of Zabarella’s View with Galileo’s in De motu,” Studies in the Renaissance, 16 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B., “William Harvey and Renaissance Aristotelianism: A Consideration of the Praefatio to De generatione animalium (1651),” in Humanismus und Medizin, ed. Schmitz, Rudolf and Keil, Gundolf (Weinheim: Acta Humaniora, 1984).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B., Aristotle in the Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Robert E., “An Evolutionary Taxonomy of Eighteenth-Century Newtonianisms,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 7 (1978).Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Simon, Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985), chap. 2Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology,” Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, StevenA Social History of Truth: Gentility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Alan E., “The Gradual Acceptance of Newton’s Theory of Light and Color, 1672–1727,” Perspectives on Science: Historical, Philosophical, Social, 4 (1996).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J., A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy G., “Vesalius and Human Diversity in De humani corporis fabrica,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 57 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy G., The Clock and the Mirror: Girolamo Cardano and Renaissance Medicine (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997), chap. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Mary M., Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Sloan, Phillip R., “John Locke, John Ray, and the Problem of the Natural System,” Journal of the History of Biology, 5 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroup, Alice, A Company of Scientists: Botany, Patronage, and Community at the Seventeenth-Century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan, Gulliver’s Travels, 3.5 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1948).Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Henry G., The Problem of Certainty in English Thought, 1630–1690 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, David L., The Seven Liberal Arts in the Middle Ages (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Wallace, William A., “Albertus Magnus on Suppositional Necessity in the Natural Sciences,” in Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1980), ed. Weisheipl, James A.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A., Galileo and His Sources: The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo’s Science (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, , Galileo, the Jesuits, and the Medieval Aristotle (Aldershot: Variorum, 1991), chap. 9.Google Scholar
Wear, Andrew “William Harvey and the ‘Way of the Anatomists’,” History of Science, 21 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wear, , “Epistemology and Learned Medicine in Early Modern England,” in Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions, ed. Bates, Don (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Weeks, AndrewParacelsus: Speculative Theory and the Crisis of the Early Reformation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Yates, Frances A. “The Hermetic Tradition in Renaissance Science,” in Yates, , Collected Essays, vol. 3, Ideas and Ideals in the North European Renaissance (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×