Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- PART I WORKERS AND PLACES
- PART II ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION
- PART III NEW OBJECTS AND IDEAS
- 20 Plate Tectonics
- 21 Geophysics and Geochemistry
- 22 Mathematical Models
- 23 Genes
- 24 Ecosystems
- 25 Immunology
- 26 Cancer
- 27 The Brain and the Behavioral Sciences
- 28 History of Biotechnology
- PART IV SCIENCE AND CULTURE
- Index
- References
23 - Genes
from PART III - NEW OBJECTS AND IDEAS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- PART I WORKERS AND PLACES
- PART II ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION
- PART III NEW OBJECTS AND IDEAS
- 20 Plate Tectonics
- 21 Geophysics and Geochemistry
- 22 Mathematical Models
- 23 Genes
- 24 Ecosystems
- 25 Immunology
- 26 Cancer
- 27 The Brain and the Behavioral Sciences
- 28 History of Biotechnology
- PART IV SCIENCE AND CULTURE
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter, we describe traditional historical accounts of the gene and gene concepts and raise some issues from recent revisionist historiography dealing with this topic. Histories of the gene and genetics are still in their infancy. Until the mid-1970s, most histories were written by scientists and reflected the viewpoints of the victors in scientific controversies. Only recently have professional historians contested traditional accounts and probed deeply into lost aspects of the history of the gene. Recent biological work has raised doubt whether there is such an entity as “the” gene. Historians now disagree about whether the gene should count as an invention or a discovery, whether the history involved is fundamentally continuous or discontinuous, and how technical and theoretical developments in genetics are connected to larger social issues, including eugenics, genome projects, genetic medicine, and biotechnological “interference” with nature.
BEFORE MENDEL
From prehistoric times, people have recognized that like begets like and have believed in some form of inheritance of acquired characters, which was used to help explain familial inheritance of character traits and physique. Later, it was used to explain susceptibility to particular diseases, such as syphilis and tuberculosis, and the adaptation of imported plants and domesticated animals to their new environments. The Hippocratics had already developed explicit theories in support of such inheritance, but sustained efforts to develop particulate theories of heredity began with the introduction of the idea of evolution in the writings of such figures as Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802), Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744–1829), and, above all, Charles Darwin (1809–1882).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 432 - 450Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, Life Science in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975);Google Scholar
, Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
, , and , “Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types. I. Induction of Transformation by a Deoxyribonucleic Acid Fraction Isolated from Pneumococcus type III,” Journal of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 79 (1944).Google Scholar
and , “Genetic Control of Biochemical Reactions in Neurospora,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 27 (1941);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “The Ultimate Chromomeres in Lilium and Aloe with Regard to the Numbers of Genes,” University of California Publications in Botany, 14 (1928).Google Scholar
, “Über mehrpolige Mitosen als Mittel zur Analyse des Zellkerns,” Verhandlungen der physikalischenmedizinischen Gesellschaft zu Würzburg, 35 (1902).Google Scholar
, “The Localization and the Role of Ribonucleic Acid in the Cell,” New York Academy of Sciences, 50 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Emergence of Bacterial Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1990).Google Scholar
, , and , “The Singular Fate of Genetics in the History of French Biology, 1900–1940,” Journal of the History of Biology, 21 (1988);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , “The French School of Genetics: From Physiological and Population Genetics to Regulatory Molecular Genetics,” Annual Review of Genetics, 33 (1999);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and , eds., Phage and the Origin of Molecular Biology (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory of Quantitative Biology, 1966).Google Scholar
, The Gene: A Critical History (Philadelphia: Saunders, 1966; repr. ed., Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
and , eds., The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in 20th Century Life Sciences (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
, “William Bateson, Mendelism, and Biometry,” Journal of the History of Biology, 6 (1973);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, The Tangled Field: Barbara McClintock’s Search for the Patterns of Genetic Control (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
, The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication (London: John Murray, 1868), chap. 27.Google Scholar
, ed., History and Development of Human Genetics (London: World Scientific, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed., Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics during Its First 50 Years (New York: Macmillan, 1951);Google Scholar
and , “The Role of the Vilmorin Company in the Promotion and Diffusion of the Experimental Science of Heredity in France, 1840–1920,” Journal of the History of Biology, 31 (1998);Google Scholar
, Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900–1933 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993);Google Scholar
and , “Independent Functions of Viral Protein and Nucleic Acid in Growth of Bacteriophage,” Journal of General Physiology, 36 (1952).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , “Genetic Regulatory Mechanisms in the Synthesis of Proteins,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 3 (1961);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , “On the Regulation of Gene Activity: β-galactosidase Formation in E. coli,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 26 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology, expanded ed. (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1996).Google Scholar
, “Selling Pure Science in Wartime: The Biochemical Genetics of G. W. Beadle,” Journal of the History of Biology, 22 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
, A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1983);Google Scholar
and , eds., The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992);Google Scholar
, “The American Breeder’s Association: Genetics and Eugenics in an Agricultural Context, 1903–13,” Social Studies of Science, 13 (1983);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
, Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900–1945 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
, Golden Helix: Inside Biotech Ventures (Sausalito, Calif.: University Science Books, 1995).Google Scholar
, ed., Fundamenta Genetica (Prague: Publishing House of Czechoslovakia Academy of Science; Brno: Moravian Museum, 1965).Google Scholar
and , eds., “The Right Organism for the Job,” a special section of the Journal of the History of Biology, 26, no. 2 (Summer 1993).Google Scholar
and , “Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance,” Genetics, 28 (1943).Google ScholarPubMed
, “Preformation or New Formation – or Neither or Both?” in A History of Embryology, ed. , , and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986);Google Scholar
, “Heredity/Development in the United States, circa 1900,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 9 (1987);Google ScholarPubMed
, “Cell Theory and Development,” in Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. , , , and (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982);Google Scholar
, “History of Medical Genetics,” in Emery-Rimoin Principles and Practices of Medical Genetics, 3rd ed., ed. , , and (Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1996).Google Scholar
, “Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden,” Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brün, 4 (1866),Google Scholar
, “The Phenomenon of Enzymatic Adaptation and Its Bearing on Problems of Genetics and Cellular Differentiation,” Growth Symposium, 11 (1947).Google Scholar
, A History of Molecular Biology, trans. Matthew Cobb (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
, “Random Segregation versus Coupling in Mendelian Inheritance,” Science, 34 (1911);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and , The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (New York: Henry Holt, 1915, rev. ed., 1922).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Presidential Address: Human and Medical Genetics, Past, Present and Future,” in Human Genetics, ed. and (Berlin: Springer, 1987).Google Scholar
, “Variation Due to Change in the Individual Gene,” American Naturalist, 56 (1922).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “The Dependence of Cell-Free Protein Synthesis in E. coli upon Naturally Occurring or Synthetic Polyribonucleotides,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 47 (1961).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ed., Svalöf, 1886–1986, Research and Results in Plant Breeding (Stockholm: LTS Förlag, 1986).Google Scholar
and , “Mendel in America: Theory and Practice, 1900–1919,” in The American Development of Biology, ed. , , and (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988);Google Scholar
, La République de Savants: La recherche française et le CNRS (Paris: Flammarion, 1990).Google Scholar
, The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971).Google Scholar
, Towards a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
, “Experimental Complexity in Biology: Some Epistemological and Historical Remarks,” Philosophy of Science, 64 (suppl.) (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
, ed., Foundations of Evolutionary Genetics: A Centenary Reappraisal (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996).Google Scholar
in The Origin of Genetics: A Mendel Source Book, ed. and (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1966).Google Scholar
, History of Genetics, from Prehistoric Times to the Rediscovery of Mendel’s Laws, trans. T. R. W. Waters (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1965).Google Scholar
, “The Linear Arrangement of Six Sex-Linked Factors in Drosophila, as Shown by Their Mode of Association,” Journal of Experimental Zoology, 14 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Double Helix (New York: Atheneum, 1968), or the Norton Critical Edition, ed. (New York: Norton, 1980).Google Scholar
, Die Continuität des Keimplasmas als Grundlage einer Theorie der Vererbung (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1885), translated as chap. 4 in Essays upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems, vol. 1, ed. , , and (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1889).Google Scholar
, “From Butterflies to Blood: Human Genetics in the United Kingdom,” in The Practices of Human Genetics, ed. and (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999).Google Scholar
, “The Early History of the Inheritance of Acquired Characters and of Pangenesis,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., 35 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by