Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:39:05.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Cancer

from PART III - NEW OBJECTS AND IDEAS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2009

By
Jean-Paul Gaudillière
Edited by
Peter J. Bowler  and
John V. Pickstone
Peter J. Bowler
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
John V. Pickstone
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

In January 1994, the journal Scientific American published a review essay on cancer that opened with a quotation from John Bailar III, a famous epidemiologist at McGill University, claiming that the “war on cancer” had not been won. Bailar was referring to the anticancer campaign launched by President Richard Nixon in 1971 as a civilian alternative to the Vietnam War and as a Republican follow-up to President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty. Bailar’s argument rested on statistical data from the National Cancer Institute suggesting that U.S. cancer death rates, adjusted for the aging population, went up seven percent during the twenty-five years of a war that was waged by means of research investments – both biological and clinical.

That article reminds us that cancer remains the visible, frightening, and “scientific” disease it has been for more than a century. More than tuberculosis or syphilis, which were considered conquered after World War II, cancer was the scourge of the twentieth century. From the late nineteenth century, the growing incidence of various types of tumors, as well as the limitations of existing therapies, have been at the center of Western medical discourses increasingly concerned with relatively wealthy and aging populations. Since then, experts have viewed the formation of tumors as a problem of unlimited multiplication of cells, a process that might be controlled by physical or chemical means derived froma better understanding of cell growth and cell division.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 486 - 503
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austoker, J., AHistory of the Imperial Cancer Fund: 1902–1986 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988);Google Scholar
Beardsley, Tim, “A War Not Won,” Scientific American, 270 (January 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U., Risk Society (London: Sage, 1992).Google Scholar
Berridge, V., “Science and Policy: The Case of Postwar British Smoking Policy,” in Ashes to Ashes: The History of Smoking and Health, ed. Lock, V., Reynolds, L., and Tansey, E. M. (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998);Google Scholar
Boudia, S., “The Curie Laboratory: Radioactivity and Metrology,” History and Technology, 13 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, A., “Cigarette, Risk, and American Culture,” Daedalus, 119 (1990);Google Scholar
Bud, R., “Strategy in American Cancer Research after World War II: A Case Study,” Social Studies of Science, 8 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynum, W., Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Cambrosio, A. and Keating, P., Biomedical Platforms (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Cantor, D., “Cancer,” in Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine, ed. Bynum, W. F. and Porter, R. (London: Routledge, 1993);Google Scholar
Cantor, D., ed., “Cancer,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine (Special Issue), 81 (Spring 2007).Google ScholarPubMed
Cantor, D., “The MRC Support for Experimental Radiology during the Inter-war Years,” in Historical Perspective on the Role of the MRC, ed. Austoker, J. and Bryder, L. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Casamayou, M. H., The Politics of Breast Cancer (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2001);Google Scholar
Cassier, M. and Gaudillière, J.-P., “Recherche, médecine et marché: La génétique du cancer du sein,” Sciences Sociales et Santé, 18 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creager, A. N., The Life of a Virus: Wendell Stanley, TMV, and Material Models in Biomedical Research (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001);Google Scholar
Creager, A. N. and Gaudillière, J.-P., “Experimental Arrangements and Technologies of Visualization: Cancer as a Viral Epidemic,” in Infection and Heredity: A History of Disease Transmission, ed. Gaudillière, J.-P. and Löwy, I. (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
De Moulin, D., A Short History of Breast Cancer (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, M. R., Radon’s Deadly Daughters: Science, Environmental Policy, and the Politics of Risk (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998).Google Scholar
Fujimura, J., Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudillière, J.-P., “Circulating Mice and Viruses: The Jackson Memorial Laboratory, the National Cancer Institute and the Genetics of Breast Cancer,” in The Practices of Human Genetics, ed. Mendelsohn, E. and Fortun, M. (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999);Google Scholar
Gaudillière, J.-P., Inventer la biomédecine (Paris: La Découverte, 2002) (English trans. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Gaudillière, J.-P., “The Molecularization of Cancer Etiology in the Postwar United States: Instruments, Politics, and Management,” in Molecularizing Biology and Medicine, ed. Kamminga, H. and de Chadarevian, S. (Amsterdam: Harwood, 1998).Google Scholar
Hopwood, N., “Giving Body to Embryos: Modeling, Mechanism and the Microtome in the Late 19th Century Anatomy,” Isis, 90 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacyna, L. S., “The Laboratory and the Clinic: The Impact of Pathology on Surgical Diagnosis in the Glasgow Western Infirmary, 1875–1910,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 62 (1988).Google Scholar
Löwy, I., “The Century of the Transformed Cell,” in Science in the Twentieth Century, ed. Krige, J. and Pestre, D. (Amsterdam: Harwood, 1998);Google Scholar
Löwy, I., Between Bench and Bedside: Science, Healing and Interleukine 2 in a Cancer Ward (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Löwy, I., “Variances of Meanings in Discovery Accounts: The Case of Contemporary Biology,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 22 (1990);Google Scholar
Lerner, Barron H., The Breast Cancer Wars: Hope, Fear and the Pursuit of a Cure in Twentieth-Century America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001);Google Scholar
Magnello, E., A Centenary History of the Christie Hospital, Manchester (Manchester: Christie Hospital and the Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, University of Manchester, 2001).Google Scholar
Marks, H., The Progress of Experiment: Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900–1990 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Maulitz, R. C., Morbid Appearances (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maulitz, R. C., “Rudolf Virchow and the Program of Pathology,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 52 (1978);Google Scholar
Morange, M., “From the Regulatory Vision of Cancer to the Oncogene Paradigm,” Journal of the History of Biology, 30 (1997).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgen, S., In Our Own Hands: The Women’s Health Movement in the United States (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Olson, J. S., The History of Cancer: An Annotated Bibliography (New York: Greenwood Press, 1989);Google Scholar
Pasveer, B., “Depiction in Medicine as a Two-Way Affair: X-ray Pictures and Pulmonary Tuberculosis in the Early 20th Century,” in Medicine and Change: Historical and Sociological Studies of Medical Innovation, ed. Löwy, I. (Paris: INSERM–John Libbey, 1993).Google Scholar
Patterson, J. T., The Dread Disease: Cancer and Modern American Culture (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Pinell, P., “Cancer,” in Medicine in the Twentieth Century, ed. Cooter, R. and Pickstone, J. (Amsterdam: Harwood, 1998);Google Scholar
Pinell, P., Naissance d’un fléau: La lutte contre le cancer en France (Paris: Editions Métailié, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, R., Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and What We Don’t Know about Cancer (New York: Basic Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Proctor, R., The Nazi War on Cancer (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rader, K., Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Rasmussen, N., Picture Control: The Electron Microscope and the Transformation of Biology in America, 1940–1960 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1997);Google Scholar
Rather, L. J., The Genesis of Cancer (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978);Google Scholar
Rettig, R. A., Cancer Crusade: The History of the National Cancer Act of 1971 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Rheinberger, H. J., “From Microsomes to Ribosomes: Strategies of Representation,” Journal of the History of Biology, 28 (1995);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, E., “The Politics of Therapeutic Evaluation: The Vitamin C and Cancer Controversy,” Social Studies of Science, 18 (1988);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Evelleen, Vitamin C and Cancer: Medicine or Politics? (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, C., Hazards of the Job: From Industrial Disease to Environmental Health Science (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997);Google Scholar
Shimkin, M. B., Contrary to Nature (Washington, D.C.: NIH Publications, 1979).Google Scholar
Starr, P., The Social Transformation of American Medicine (New York: Basic Books, 1982).Google Scholar
Strickland, S. P., Politics, Science, and the Dread Disease (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Helvoort, T., “Viren als Krebserreger: Peyton Rous, das ‘infektiöse Prinzip’; und die Krebsforschung,” in Stretegien der Kausalität: Konzepte der Krankheitsverursachung im 19 und 20. Jahrhundert, ed. Gradmann, Christoph and Schlich, Thomas (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus, 1999).Google Scholar
Vincent, B., “Genesis of the Pavillon Pasteur of the Institut du Radium,” History of Technology, 13 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×