Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:27:24.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The elites

from Part IV - Russian Society, Law and Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Dominic Lieven
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Throughout the imperial period Russia’s political and social elites were drawn overwhelmingly from members of the hereditary noble estate (soslovie). Even in 1914 the core of the social elite were members of great aristocratic landowning families. This group overlapped to a still considerable but ever decreasing degree with the political elite, whose core were senior civilian and military officials. The aristocrats were all from hereditary noble families, these families usually being both old and titled, as well as rich. Most of the military and bureaucratic elite were also by birth from the hereditary nobility, the majority still coming from well-established though not usually rich land-owning families of the provincial gentry, or sometimes from well-entrenched service noble ‘dynasties’. The still relatively small minority of senior generals and bureaucrats who were not noble by birth had acquired this status automatically by reaching senior ranks in the civil and military service.

There were really only two relatively minor exceptions to the rule that the imperial elite was made up of hereditary noblemen. During the whole period senior clerics of the Orthodox Church, all of them drawn from the celibate monastic clergy, played a significant role in tsarist government and society. Since the Church was firmly subordinated to the secular ruling elite and enjoyed limited status in aristocratic society, perhaps the senior clergy is best defined as a sub-elite. The other non-noble sub-elite worth mentioning is the new Russian business class which had emerged since the middle of the nineteenth century and whose national centre was Moscow. Whereas before the 1850s most great business fortunes either were founded by the nobility or were absorbed into it by marriage or ennoblement, this became much less true in the last three generations of Imperial Russia, when a distinctive Moscow business elite and subculture emerged and came to dominate Muscovite society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, B., Monarchs and Ministers: The Grand Council in mid Ch’ing China 1723–1820 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).
Becker, S., Nobility and Privilege in Late Imperial Russia (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1985).
Chubardin, G. S., Staraia gvardiia (Orel: Izd. Veshnie vody, 2002).
Dwyer, P. G. (ed.), Napoleon and Europe (London: Longman, 2001).
Fleming, S. N., The Muslim Bonaparte. Diplomacy and Orientalism in Ali Pasha’s Greece (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).
Freeze, G., ‘The Soslovie (Estate) Paradigm in Russian Social History’, American Historical Review 91 (1986).Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Blinkhorn, M. (eds.), Landownership and Power in Modern Europe (London: Harper Collins, 1991).
Jones, R. E., The Emancipation of the Russian Nobility 1762–1785 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).
Karnovich, E. P., Zamechatel’naia bogatstva chastnikh lits v Rossii (St Petersburg: Suvorin, 1885).
Khristoforov, I. A., ‘Aristokraticheskaia’ oppozitsiia velikim reformam (Moscow: Russkoe slovo, 2002).
Kissane, W., Explaining Irish Democracy (Dublin: University College of Dublin Press, 2002).
Kohut, Z., Russian Centralism and Ukrainian Autonomy: Imperial Absorption of the Hetmanate, 1760s–1830s (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988).
Korelin, A. P., Dvorianstvo v poreformennoi Rossii (Moscow: Nauka, 1979).
Lieven, D., ‘The Russian Civil Service under Nicholas II: Some Variations on the Bureaucratic Theme’, The Aristocracy in Europe 1815–1914 (London: Macmillan, 1992).
Lieven, D., ‘The Russian Civil Service under Nicholas II: Some Variations on the Bureaucratic Theme’, Russia’s Rulers under the Old Regime (London: Yale University Press, 1989).
Lieven, D., ‘The Russian Civil Service under Nicholas II: Some Variations on the Bureaucratic Theme’, JfGO 29 (1981).Google Scholar
Madariaga, I., Russia in the Age of Catherine the Great (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1981).
Madariaga, I., ‘The Russian Nobility in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’, in Scott, H. M. (ed.), The European Nobilities in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (London: Longman, 1995).Google Scholar
Mantran, R. (ed.), Histoire de l’Empire Ottoman (Paris: Fayard, 1989).
Marasinova, N., Psikhologiia elity rossiiskogo dvorianstva poslednei tret’i XVIII veka (Moscow: Rosspen, 1999).
Minarik, L. P., Ekonomicheskaia kharakteristika krupneishikh sobstvennikov Rossii kontsa XIX-nachala XX vek (Moscow: Nauka, 1971).
Mironenko, S., Samoderzhavie i reformy: politicheskaia bor’ba v Rossii v nachale XIX v. (Moscow: Nauka, 1989).
Montefiore, S., Prince of Princes: The Life of Potemkin (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2000).
Peterson, W. J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of China, vol. IX, Part I: The Ching Dynasty to 1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Pierce, S. N., The Imperial Harem:Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Raeff, M., Origins of the Russian Intelligentsia (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1966).
Ragsdale, H. (ed.), Paul I: A Reassessment of His Life and Reign (Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 1979).
Rawski, S. N., The Last Emperors: A Social History of Qing Imperial Institutions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998).
Saunders, D., The Ukrainian Impact on Russian Culture 1750–1850 (Edmonton: CIUS, 1988).
Scott, S. N., The Response of the Royal Army to the French Revolution (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).
Troitskii, S. M., Russkii absoliutizm i dvorianstvo v XVIIIv: Formirovanie biurokratii (Moscow: Nauka, 1974).
Verzhbitskii, V. G., Revoliutsionnoe dvizhenie v russkoi armii 1826–1859 (Moscow: Izd. Sovetskaia Rossiia, 1964).
von Haxthausen, A., The Russian Empire: Its People, Institutions and Resources, trans. R. Faire, 2 vols. (London: Frank Cass, 1968):vol. II.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The elites
  • Edited by Dominic Lieven, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Russia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521815291.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The elites
  • Edited by Dominic Lieven, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Russia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521815291.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The elites
  • Edited by Dominic Lieven, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Russia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521815291.013
Available formats
×