Book contents
- The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution
- The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction The Disciplinary Revolutions of Early Modern Philosophy and Science
- Part I The Disciplines
- Part II Disciplinary Activities
- 8 The Art of Thinking
- 9 Astrology, Natural Magic, and the Scientific Revolution
- 10 Practitioners’ Knowledge
- 11 Medicine and the Science of the Living Body
- 12 Experimental Natural History
- 13 Celestial Physics
- 14 Applying Mathematics to Nature
- 15 Mathematical Innovation and Tradition: The Cartesian Common and the Leibnizian New Analyses
- 16 Mechanics in Newton’s Wake
- Part III Problems and Controversies
- Bibliography
- Index
10 - Practitioners’ Knowledge
from Part II - Disciplinary Activities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2022
- The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution
- The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction The Disciplinary Revolutions of Early Modern Philosophy and Science
- Part I The Disciplines
- Part II Disciplinary Activities
- 8 The Art of Thinking
- 9 Astrology, Natural Magic, and the Scientific Revolution
- 10 Practitioners’ Knowledge
- 11 Medicine and the Science of the Living Body
- 12 Experimental Natural History
- 13 Celestial Physics
- 14 Applying Mathematics to Nature
- 15 Mathematical Innovation and Tradition: The Cartesian Common and the Leibnizian New Analyses
- 16 Mechanics in Newton’s Wake
- Part III Problems and Controversies
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The status of the knowledge of early modern craft practitioners and artisans has long been a point of contention among scholars, and several historians recently have argued that artisanal knowledge was central to the emergence of early modern science. This chapter follows attitudes towards craft practitioners and artisans, beginning in antiquity, when many philosophers argued that practical knowledge (techne) was of lesser value than theoretical knowledge (episteme). Following the elevation of the mechanical arts in the Middle Ages and the proliferation of practical how-to manuals in the Renaissance, a growing appreciation for artisanal work grew among philosophers. Renaissance humanists elevated the intellectual status of artistic practice, and iconoclasts like Paracelsus railed against knowledge gained without direct experience, praising instead the knowledge of miners and alchemists. Architects, engineers, and artisans came to embody the Renaissance ideal of the “polymath,” and practical knowledge became a central component of the philosophy of Francis Bacon, as well as the experimental science that was institutionalized by groups such as the Royal Society of London. Following postcolonial critiques of Eurocentrism, some have suggested the history of science should embrace a broader ambit that includes practitioners’ knowledge.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution , pp. 184 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- 2
- Cited by