Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:21:10.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Ptolemy

from I - Philosophy in the later Roman Empire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2011

Lloyd P. Gerson
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Klaudios Ptolemaios, or Ptolemy, is known today mainly for his contributions to astronomy and astrology. Following Otto Neugebauer, historians of science tend to emphasize the significance of Ptolemy’s astronomical models. These models clearly deserve this attention, for they served as the western world’s paradigm in astronomy for approximately 1,400 years, up to the time of the Scientific Revolution. Modern astrologers, on the other hand, continue to hold Ptolemy’s astrological work, the Tetrabiblos, in high regard. If Ptolemy is known principally for his mathematical and natural philosophical contributions, one may reasonably wonder, why does he deserve a place in this volume on philosophy in late antiquity?

The answer, put plainly, is that Ptolemy was a self-identified philosopher who examined a number of the most pressing philosophical questions of his time, commented on the (lack of) success of previous philosophical theories, appropriated the philosophical concepts of contemporary schools, and, moreover, propounded philosophical ideas unprecedented in the history of ancient Greek philosophy. Ptolemy, however, was not a typical philosopher. He neither affiliated himself with a specific school nor did he proclaim himself an eclectic, as did his contemporary Galen. Ptolemy’s texts, in fact, reveal him to be a Platonic empiricist. He adopts Platonic, Aristotelian, and, to a lesser extent, Stoic ideas, but the manner in which he mixes these philosophical influences depends heavily on contemporary Platonic concerns. While Ptolemy does not identify himself as a Platonist in his texts, the ideas he promulgates reveal a substantial Platonic influence on his philosophy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×