Terminist logic

doi:10.1017/CHO9781107446953.015

11 - Terminist logic

from II - Logic and language

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014

E. Jennifer Ashworth

Edited by

Robert Pasnau

Edited in association with

Christina van Dyke

Show author details

E. Jennifer Ashworth: Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Robert Pasnau: Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Christina van Dyke: Affiliation:
Calvin College, Michigan

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Terminist logic is a specifically medieval development. It is named from its focus on terms as the basic unit of logical analysis, and so it includes both supposition theory, together with its ramifications, and the treatment of syncategorematic terms. It also includes other areas of investigation not directly linked with Aristotelian texts, notably obligations, consequences, and insolubles (see Chapters 10, 13, and 14).

Logic was at the heart of the arts curriculum, for it provided the techniques of analysis and much of the vocabulary found in philosophical, scientific, and theological writing. Moreover, it trained students for participation in the disputations that were a central feature of medieval instruction, and whose structure, with arguments for and against a thesis, followed by a resolution, is reflected in many written works. This practical application affected the way in which logic developed. While medieval thinkers had a clear idea of argumentation as involving formal structures, they were not interested in the development of formal systems, and they did not see logic as in any way akin to mathematics. Logic involved the study of natural language, albeit a natural language (Latin) that was often regimented to make formal points, and it had a straightforwardly cognitive orientation. The purpose of logic was to separate the true from the false by means of argument, and to lead from known premises to a previously unknown conclusion. In this process, the avoidance of error was crucial, so there was a heavy emphasis on the making of distinctions and on the detection of fallacies. The procedures involved often have the appearance of being ad hoc, and modern attempts to draw precise parallels between medieval theories as a whole and the results of contemporary symbolic logic are generally doomed to failure, even though there are many fruitful partial correlations.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy , pp. 146 - 158

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781107446953.015 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashworth, E. J., The Tradition of Medieval Logic and Speculative Grammar from Anselm to the End of the Seventeenth Century. A Bibliography from 1836 Onwards (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1978)

Pironet, Fabienne, The Tradition of Medieval Logic and Speculative Grammar from Anselm to the End of the Seventeenth Century. A Bibliography (1977–1994) (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997)

de Rijk, L. M., Logica modernorum: A Contribution to the History of Early Terminist Logic (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1962–7) vol. I: On the Twelfth-Century Theories of Fallacy, and vol. II: The Origin and Early Development of the Theory of Supposition

Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.) The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, vol. 1: Logic and the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)

Lewry, P. Osmund, “Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric 1220–1320,” in Catto, J. (ed.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. I: The Early Oxford Schools (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1984) 401–33

Kretzmann, Norman et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism. 1100–1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)

Gilbert, Neal, “Ockham, Wyclif, and the ‘Via Moderna’,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 9 (1974) pp. 111–15Google Scholar

Braakhuis, H. A. G., “School Philosophy and Philosophical Schools: The Semantic-Ontological Views in the Cologne Commentaries on Peter of Spain, and the ‘Wegestreit’,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 20 (1989) esp. pp. 1–2 and 6Google Scholar

d’Ors, Angel, “Petrus Hispanus O.P., Auctor Summularum,” Vivarium 35 (1997) 21–71, 39 (2001) 209–54, 41 (2003) 249–303Google Scholar

Braakhuis, H. A. G., “English Tracts on Syncategorematic Terms from Robert Bacon to Walter Burley,” in Braakhuis, H. A. G. et al. (eds.) English Logic and Semantics from the End of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockham and Burleigh (Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers, 1981) pp. 138–40

Ashworth, E. J. and Spade, Paul, “Logic in Late Medieval Oxford,” in Catto, J. I. and Evans, R. (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992) 35–64

Kretzmann, et al., The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, p. 188

Kretzmann, and Stump, , in Cambridge Translations, vol. I, p. 105; ed. Alessio, p. 206

Helias, Peter, Summa super Priscianum, ed. Reilly, p. 891

Ebbesen, Sten, “Early Supposition Theory (12th–13th Century),” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3 (1981) 35–48Google Scholar

Kneepkens, C. H., “‘Suppositio’ and ‘supponere’ in 12th-Century Grammar,” in Jolivet, J. and de Libera, A. (eds.) Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains: aux origines de la Logica modernorum (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1987) 325–51

Panaccio, Claude and Perini-Santos, Ernesto, “Guillaume d’Ockham et la suppositio materialis,” Vivarium 42 (2004) 202–24Google Scholar

Bacon, Roger, Summulae II (ed. de Libera, p. 266); Lambert, Logica, p. 209

Malcolm, John, “A Reconsideration of the Identity and Inherence Theories of the Copula,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (1979) 383–400Google Scholar

de Libera, Alain, “Supposition naturelle et appellation: aspects de la sémantique parisienne au XIIIe siècle,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3 (1981) 63–77Google Scholar

Asztalos, M. (ed.) The Editing of Theological and Philosophical Texts from the Middle Ages (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International, 1986) 213–44

Spade, Paul, “The Logic of the Categorical: The Medieval Theory of Descent and Ascent,” in Kretzmann, N. (ed.) Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988) 187–224

Read, Stephen, “Thomas of Cleves and Collective Supposition,” Vivarium 29 (1991) 50–84Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J., Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics (London: Variorum Reprints, 1985)