Individual autonomy

doi:10.1017/CHO9781107446953.049

40 - Individual autonomy

from VII - Political philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014

Cary J. Nederman

Edited by

Robert Pasnau

Edited in association with

Christina van Dyke

Show author details

Cary J. Nederman: Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Robert Pasnau: Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Christina van Dyke: Affiliation:
Calvin College, Michigan

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Some readers may find it surprising to encounter a chapter on “individual autonomy” in a survey of medieval philosophy, especially in connection with political philosophy. After all, an established tradition of historical scholarship insists that the Middle Ages was a period in which hierarchy, interdependence, and communal holism were emphasized to the virtual exclusion of the individual. The recovery of Aristotle’s writings on ethics and politics during the course of the mid-thirteenth century would seem only to reinforce the generally “communitarian” and anti-individualistic orientation commonly ascribed to medieval thinkers. Recently, the image of medieval Europe as hostile to the individual has been reaffirmed by its depiction as a “persecuting society.” Thus, according to the conventional view, the Renaissance and the Reformation constituted the watershed for the appearance of the individual as a moral and political category worthy of philosophical consideration.

Yet medieval political thinkers, both before and after the dissemination of Latin translations of Aristotle’s work, were surprisingly attuned to the standing of the individual and the role of free choice in public affairs. In their emphasis on the centrality of private property and consent to government, as well as their insistence on the ability of individuals to enjoy forms of personal liberty (such as free thought, judgment, and speech), these authors resisted the supposedly hierocratic (even authoritarian) tendencies that scholarship often ascribes to the Middle Ages. In turn, the ability of high and late medieval writers to establish a firm grounding for the individual in relation to religious as well as political authority depended upon their access to a wide range of pagan and Christian sources that yielded philosophical and theological principles supporting personal autonomy. For example, the political and legal traditions inherited from Rome endorsed such values as liberty, philosophical skepticism, and economic freedom.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy , pp. 551 - 564

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781107446953.049 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beer, Samuel, “The Rule of the Wise and the Holy: Hierarchy in the Thomistic System,” Political Theory 14 (1984) 391–422Google Scholar

Moore, R. I., The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950–1250, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007)

Martin, John, “Inventing Sincerity, Refashioning Prudence: The Discovery of the Individual in Renaissance Europe,” American Historical Review 102 (1997) 1309–42Google Scholar

Black, Antony, “Society and the Individual from the Middle Ages to Rousseau: Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Constitutional Theory,” History of Political Thought 1 (1980) 145–66Google Scholar

Wirszubski, Chaim, Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950)

Schmitt, Charles, Cicero Scepticus (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1972) pp. 18–42

Langholm, Odd, The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998) pp. 30–42

Harrison, Simon, “Do We Have a Will? Augustine’s Way in to the Will,” and Simo Knuuttila, “The Emergence of the Logic of the Will in Medieval Thought,” both in Matthews, G. (ed.) The Augustinian Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999) 195–221

Lottin, Odon, Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles (Gembloux: Duculot, 1948) vol. II, pt. IV

Tierney, Brian, The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law, 1150–1625 (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1997)

Morris, Colin, The Discovery of the Individual 1050–1200 (New York: Harper and Row, 1972)

Spijker, Ineke van’t, Fictions of the Inner Life: Religious Literature and Formation of the Self in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004)

Nederman, Cary, John of Salisbury (Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2005)

Keys, Mary, Aquinas, Aristotle and the Pursuit of the Common Good (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)

Tierney, Brian, “Hierarchy, Consent and the ‘Western Tradition,’” Political Theory 15 (1987) 646–54Google Scholar

Coleman, Janet, “Dominium in Thirteenth- and Fourteenth-Century Political Thought and its Seventeenth-Century Heirs: John of Paris and Locke,” Political Studies 33 (1985) 73–100Google Scholar

“Poverty, Property and Political Thought in Fourteenth Century Scholastic Philosophy,” in Wenin, C. (ed.) L’homme et son univers au moyen age (Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1986) pp. 845–55

Langholm, Odd, Economics in the Medieval Schools: Wealth, Exchange, Value, Money and Usury According to the Paris Theological Tradition, 1200–1350 (Leiden: Brill, 1992)

Nederman, Cary J., Community and Consent: The Secular Political Theory of Marsiglio of Padua’s Defensor Pacis (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995)

Post, Gaines, Studies in Medieval Legal Thought: Public Law and the State 1100–1322 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1964) pp. 163–238

McGrade, A. S., The Political Thought of William of Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974)

Coleman, Janet, A History of Political Thought from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000) pp. 169–92

Shogimen, Takashi, “From Disobedience to Toleration: William of Ockham and the Medieval Discourse of Fraternal Correction,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 52 (2001) 599–622Google Scholar