Book contents
- Frontmatter
- VII Political philosophy
- VIII Metaphysics
- 44 The subject of the Aristotelian science of metaphysics
- 45 Essence and existence
- 46 Form and matter
- 47 Realism
- 48 Nominalism in the later Middle Ages
- 49 Accidents and modes
- IX Theology
- Appendix A Doctrinal creeds
- Appendix B Medieval translations
- Appendix C Biographies of medieval authors
- Bibliography of primary sources
- Bibliography of secondary sources
- Index nominum
- Index rerum
- References
46 - Form and matter
from VIII - Metaphysics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2011
- Frontmatter
- VII Political philosophy
- VIII Metaphysics
- 44 The subject of the Aristotelian science of metaphysics
- 45 Essence and existence
- 46 Form and matter
- 47 Realism
- 48 Nominalism in the later Middle Ages
- 49 Accidents and modes
- IX Theology
- Appendix A Doctrinal creeds
- Appendix B Medieval translations
- Appendix C Biographies of medieval authors
- Bibliography of primary sources
- Bibliography of secondary sources
- Index nominum
- Index rerum
- References
Summary
The first unquestionably big idea in the history of philosophy was the idea of form. The idea of course belonged to Plato, and was then domesticated at the hands of Aristotle, who paired form with matter as the two chief principles of his metaphysics and natural philosophy. In the medieval period, it was Aristotle’s conception of form and matter that generally dominated. This was true for both the Islamic and the Christian tradition, once the entire Aristotelian corpus became available. For this reason, although there is much to say about the fate of Platonic Forms in medieval thought, the present chapter will focus on the Aristotelian tradition.
Aristotelian commentators have been puzzled by form and matter for as long as there have been Aristotelian commentators. Indeed, it would not be too much to say that these are topics about which Aristotelians have never formed a very clear conception, and that their failure to do so was the principal reason why Aristotelianism ceased to be a flourishing research program from the seventeenth century onward. For those who aspire to a modern revival of Aristotelianism, the concepts of form and matter can easily take on the aspect of a kind of Holy Grail, such that if only we could get these ideas clearly in focus, we could see our way forward on any number of philosophical fronts, such as the union of mind and body, the coherence and endurance of substances, the nature of causality, and so on.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy , pp. 635 - 646Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
- 1
- Cited by