Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:01:34.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Science and literary criticism

from LITERATURE AND OTHER DISCIPLINES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Michel Baridon
Edited by
H. B. Nisbet  and
Claude Rawson
H. B. Nisbet
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Claude Rawson
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Science and literary criticism are generally considered to stand so far apart that one cannot analyse their mutual relations without clear definitions of both.

If we assume, as did Ezra Pound, that ‘literature is news that stays news’, we can consider writers as agents in the transformation of the world-picture of their age. They therefore have something in common with scientists, who keep modifying received ideas by the testing of new paradigms. But their quest for modernity does not always elicit an immediate response on the part of the critics: Thomson's Seasons popularized a form of natural sublimity which received its critical status in Burke's Enquiry almost thirty years later. Thus, if we wish to consider literary criticism in both its incipient and developed forms, we must include in our corpus the stray remarks, sometimes off the cuff, made by the authors themselves.

The same applies to science. The term must be used in a broad sense, i.e., science as understood by the interested layman. Innovations, whether a writer rejects or favours them, will attract his attention and develop his creative powers, but science, as he apprehends it, is often mediated by philosophy. To use the example of Thomson again, he and Swift held different views about the Royal Society, but the ‘new science’ was central to their preoccupations. Neither of them had done any work in a laboratory, but both knew about the Boyle Lectures and about the controversies caused by the Essay concerning Human Understanding, which relies on the corpuscular theory of matter.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 778 - 797
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, Hans, et al. (eds.), Papers in the History of Linguistics (Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, M. H., The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (New York, 1953; rpt 1958).Google Scholar
Addison, Joseph, The Spectator, ed. Bond, Donald F. (5 vols., Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar
Apostolidès, Jean-Marie, Le Roi-Machine (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Pierre, Nicole, La Logique, ou l'art de penser (Paris, 1662).Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. H., English Literary Criticism, 17th and 18th Centuries (London, 1951; rpt 1966).Google Scholar
Belaval, Yvon, ‘La Crise de la géométrisation de l'univers dans la philosophie des lumières’, Revue internationale de Philosophie, 6 (1972).Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, trans. Wallace, Robert M. (Cambridge MA, 1983).Google Scholar
Boswell, James, The Life of Samuel Johnson, ed. Hill, George Birkbeck, rev. Powell, L. F. (6 vols., Oxford, 1934–50).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (London, 1757), ed. Boulton, James T. (London, 1958).Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas, Sacred Theory of the Earth (London, 1684).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment (Princeton, 1951).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, Rousseau, Kant and Goethe (Princeton, 1945; rpt 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Cartesian Linguistics (New York, 1966).Google Scholar
Condorcet, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat marquis, Esquisse d'un Tableau historique des Progrès de l'Esprit humain (Paris, An V), ed. Prior, O. H. (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian P., ‘Jewish theologies of space in the scientific revolution: More, Raphson, Newton and their predecessors’, Annals of Science, 37, 5 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombie, Alistair C., Augustine to Galileo (Harvard, 1952; rpt 1979).Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair C., ‘Experimental science and the rational artist in early modern Europe’, Daedalus (Summer, 1986).Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair C., Science, Optics and Music in Medieval and Early Modern Thought (London, 1990).Google Scholar
Dennis, John, Critical Works, ed. Hooker, Edward N. (Baltimore, 1939–1943).Google Scholar
Descartes, René, Oeuvres (Paris, 1953).Google Scholar
Dewhurst, Kenneth, John Locke, Physician and Philosopher (London, 1963).Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J., The Mechanization of the World-Picture (Princeton, 1986).Google Scholar
Dryden, John, Essays, ed. Ker, W. P. (2 vols., Oxford, 1926).Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry, The History of Tom Jones, A Foundling (London, 1749), ed. Battestin, Martin C. and Bowers, Fredson (2 vols., Oxford, 1974).Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia, L'Estetica del Gusto nel Settecento inglese (Florence, 1962).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Les Mots et les Choses (Paris, 1966); English trans. The Order of Things (London, 1974).Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (7 vols., London, 1896–1900).Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Goethes Werke, ed. Trunz, Erich (14 vols., Hamburg, 1948–64).Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg, Sämtliche Werke, ed. Nadler, Josef (Vienna, 1949–53).Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas L., Science and the Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1985) with a Bibliographical Essay.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried, Sämtliche Werke, ed. Suphan, B. (Berlin 1877–1913).Google Scholar
Hobbes, , Leviathan (1651), ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Harmondsworth, 1986).Google Scholar
Hume, David, Essays Moral, Political and Literary, ed. Green, T. H. and Mossner, E. C. (2 vols., London, 1922).Google Scholar
Hume, David, Letters of David Hume, ed. Greig, J. Y. T. (London, 1932).Google Scholar
Hume, David, New Letters of David Hume, ed. Klibansky, R. and , E. C. Mossner (London, 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David A.Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (London, 1964).Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, The Works of Samuel Johnson, Yale edition (New Haven, 1958–).Google Scholar
Kames, Henry Home Lord, Elements of Criticism (3 vols., Edinburgh, 1762; rpt 1967).Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre, Études newtoniennes (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe (London, 1962).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962).Google Scholar
La Motte, Antoine Houdart, Discours sur la Fable, in Oeuvres complètes, IX (Paris, 1754).Google Scholar
Lancelot, Claude, and Antoine, Arnauld, Grammaire générate et raisonnée (Paris, 1660).Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, Sämtliche Werke, ed. Lachmann, K. and Muncker, F. (23 vols., Leipzig, 1886–1924).Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O., Essays in the History of Ideas (Baltimore, 1948).Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O., The Great Chain of Being (Harvard, 1936).Google Scholar
Maclean, Kenneth, John Locke and English Literature in the Eighteenth Century (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
Metzger, Hélène, Newton, Stahl, Boerhaave et la Doctrine chimique (Paris, 1930).Google Scholar
Naves, Raymond, Le Goût de Voltaire (Paris, 1938).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Opticks, ed. Whittaker, E. T. (London, 1931).Google Scholar
Nicolson, Marjorie H., Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory (Ithaca, 1959; rpt Toronto, 1963).Google Scholar
Nisbet, H. B., Herder and the Philosophy and History of Science (Cambridge, 1970).Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin, Galileo as Critic of the Arts (The Hague, 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean, L'Epistémologie génétique (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean, and Garcia, R., Psychogenèse et Histoire des Sciences (Paris, 1983).Google Scholar
Pittock, Joan, The Ascendancy of Taste. The Achievement of Joseph and Thomas Warton (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Rhys, Hedley Howell (ed.), Seventeenth Century Science and the Arts (Princeton, 1961).Google Scholar
Rousseau, G. S. and Roy, Porter, The Ferment of Knowledge (Cambridge, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Oeuvres complètes (Paris, 1959–).Google Scholar
Schick, Edgar B., Metaphorical Organicism in Herder's Early Works. A Study of the Relation of Herder's Literary Idiom to his World View, De Proprietatibus Litterarum, Series Practica, 20 (The Hague and Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Sebok, Thomas A. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics (The Hague and Paris, 1975).Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, third Earl of, Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (London 1711; ed. Robertson, J. M., 2 vols., New York, 1900).Google Scholar
Spingarn, J. E., Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century (London, 1908–9).Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie, History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century (2 vols., London, 1876).Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie, A History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century (1876; 2 vols., London, 1962).Google Scholar
Taton, René (ed.), A General History of the Sciences, trans. Pomerans, A. J. (4 vols., London, 1963–6).Google Scholar
Turgot, Anne-Robert Jacques, Oeuvres, ed. Nemours, Dupont (Paris, 1844).Google Scholar
Tuveson, Ernest L., The Imagination as a Means of Grace. Locke and the Aesthetics of Romanticism (Los Angeles and London, 1960).Google Scholar
Voltaire, , Oeuvres, ed. Moland, Louis (Paris, 1877–83).Google Scholar
Wahl, Jean, Le Rôle de I'Instant dans la Philosophie de Descartes (Paris, 1920).Google Scholar
Wellek, René, A History of Modern Criticism, 1750–1900 (4 vols., London, 1955; rpt 1970).Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K., and Brooks, Cleanth, Literary Criticism. A Short History (New York, 1957; paperback edn, 1967).Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William K. and Cleanth, Brooks, Literary Criticism. A Short History (New York, 1957; rpt 1970).Google Scholar
Wolf, A., A History of Science, Technology and Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1952).Google Scholar
Wolf, A., A History of Science, Technology and Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (London, 1950).Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, and Samuel, Taylor Coleridge, Lyrical Ballads (1805; ed. Roper, Derek, London, 1968).Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, Lyrical Ballads, ed. Brett, R. L. and Jones, A. R. (New York and Cambridge, 1963).Google Scholar
Young, Edward, Conjectures on Original Composition (London, 1759; rpt 1966).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×