Russian Formalism

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.003

1 - Russian Formalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Peter Steiner

Edited by

Raman Selden

Show author details

Peter Steiner: Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Russian Formalism is a convenient label for a loosely knit group of critics whose signal role for contemporary literary studies can hardly be overestimated. They were born mostly in the 1890s, came to prominence in Russian letters during World War I, established themselves institutionally through the restructuring of academia after the Communist revolution, and became marginalized with the rise of Stalinism in the late 1920s. Though the affinities of Russian Formalism to some previous trends in Russian poetics cannot be denied (A. Potebnya's theory of poetic language, A. Veselovsky's historical poetics, or the metrics of the Symbolist poet-theoreticians A. Belyj and V. Bryusov), it represents a radical departure from the previously dominant mimetic theory of art. The Russian Formalists assailed the view of literature as an emanation of the author's soul, as a socio-historical document, or as a manifestation of a philosophical system. In this way, their theoretical orientation corresponded to the aesthetic sensibility of modernist art, in particular Futurism, with which the Russian Formalists were initially closely allied. It was the Futurist emphasis on the shocking effect of art and the understanding of poetry as the ‘unfolding of the word as such’ that found an analogue in Russian Formalist poetics.

Russian Formalism resists a totalizing historical synthesis for several reasons. First of all, from its very inception it was split geographically into two centres: the Moscow Linguistic Circle established in 1915, among whose members were Petr Bogatyrëv, Roman Jakobson and Grigory Vinokur, and the Petersburg OPOJAZ (the Society for the Study of Poetic Language) founded in 1916, with such scholars as Boris Eikhenbaum, Viktor Shklovsky and Yuri Tynyanov.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 11 - 30

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arvatov, Boris, Sociologiceskaja poetika (Moscow, 1928).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail, Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Works, ed. Holquist, Michael and Liapunov, Vadim, trans. Liapunov, Vadim (Austin, TX, 1990).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail, Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, ed. and trans. Emerson, Caryl (Minneapolis, 1984).CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail, Rabelais and his World, trans. Iswolsky, Hélène (Bloomington, IN, 1984).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. Holquist, Michael and Emerson, Caryl, trans. McGee, Vern (Austin, TX, 1986).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays on the Novel, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Holquist, Michael and Emerson, Caryl (Austin, TX, 1981).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail, Toward a Philosophy of the Act, ed. Holquist, Michael and Liapunov, Vadim, trans. Liapunov, Vadim (Austin, TX, 1981).Google Scholar

Bann, Stephen, and Bowlt, John E. (eds.), Russian Formalism: A Collection of Articles and Texts in Translation (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar

Bernstejn, Sergei, ‘Esteticeskie predposylki teorii deklamacii’, Poètika, 3 (1927).Google Scholar

Bernstejn, Sergei, ‘Stich i deklamacija’, Russkaja rec’: Novaja serija, I (Leningrad, 1927).Google Scholar

Bogatyrëv, Petr, and Roman Jakobson, ‘Slavjanskaja filologija v Rosii za gg. 1914–1921’, Slavia, 1 (1922).Google Scholar

Boris, Eikhenbaum, and Tynyanov, Juri (eds.), Russian Prose, trans. Parrott, R. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1985).Google Scholar

Brik, Osip, ‘Ritm i sintaksis: Materialy k izuceniju poeticeskoj reci’, Novyj Lef, 3–6 (1927).Google Scholar

Brik, Osip, ‘T.n. “formal ‘nyj metod’”, Lef 1 (1923).Google Scholar

Brik, Osip, ‘Zvukovye povtory’, in Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka, II (Petersburg, 1917).Google Scholar

Clark, Katerina and Holquist, Michael, Mikhail Bakhtin (Cambridge, MA, 1985).Google Scholar

Eagle, Herbert (ed.), Russian Formalist Film Theory (Ann Arbor, MI, 1981).Google Scholar

Efimov, Nikola, ‘Formalizm v russkom hteraturovedenii’, Smolenskij gosudarstvennyj universitet: Naucnye izvestija, vol. 5, pt. 3 (Smolensk, 1925).Google Scholar

Ehlers, Klaas-Hinrich, Das dynamische System: Zur Entwicklung von Begriffund Metaphorik des System bei Jurij Tynjanov (New York, 1992).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Anna Achmatova: Opyt analiza (Petersburg, 1923).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Aufsätze zur Theorie und Geschichte der Literatur, trans. Kämpfe, A. (Frankfurt, 1965).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Lermontov: A Study in Literary-Historical Evaluation, trans. Parrot, R. and Weber, H. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1981).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Lermontov: Opyt istoriko-literaturnoj ocenki (Leningrad, 1924).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Literatura: Teorija, kritika, polemika (Leningrad, 1927).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Melodika russkogo liriceskogosticha (Petersburg, 1922).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Moj vremennik (Leningrad, 1929).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Molodoj Tolstoj (Petersburg–Berlin, 1922).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, Skvoz' literaturu (Leningrad, 1924).Google Scholar

Eikhenbaum, Boris, The Young Tolstoi, trans. Kern, G. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1972).Google Scholar

Erlich, Victor, Russian Formalism: History–Doctrine, 3rd edn (The Hague, 1969); American edn (New Haven, 1981).Google Scholar

Erlich, Victor (ed.), Twentieth-Century Russian Literary Criticism (New Haven, 1975).Google Scholar

Hansen-Löve, Aage, Der russische Formalismus: Methodologische Rekonstruktion seiner Entwicklung aus dem Prinzip der Verfremdung (Vienna, 1978).Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman.Über den tschechischen Vers. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des russischen Verses (= Postilla Bohemica 8–10, 1974).

Jakobson, Roman.Language in Literature, ed. Pomorska, K. and Rudy, S. (Cambridge, MA, 1987).Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, Novejsaja russkaja poezija: Nabrosok pervyj (Prague, 1921).Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, O češcaron;skom stiche preimuscestvenno v sopostavlenii s russkim (Berlin, 1923).Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, and Pomorska, Krystyna, Dialogues (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar

Jakubinsky, Lev, ‘O poeticeskom glossemosočetanii’, in Poetika: Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka (Petersburg, 1919).Google Scholar

Jakubinsky, Lev, ‘O zvukach stichotvornogo jazyka’, in Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka, I (Petersburg, 1916).Google Scholar

Jakubinsky, Lev, ‘Skoplenie odinakovych plavnych v prakticeskom i poeticeskom jazykach’, ibid., II (Petersburg, 1917).Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric, The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism (Princeton, 1974).Google Scholar

Juri, Striedter, Literary Structure, Evolution, and Value: Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Reconsidered (Cambridge, MA, 1989).Google Scholar

Lemon, Lee T., and Reis, Marion J. (eds.), Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (Lincoln, NE, 1965).Google Scholar

Matejka, Ladislav, and Pomorska, Krystyna (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views (Cambridge, MA, 1971).Google Scholar

Medvedev, P. N. (attributed to M. Bakhtin), The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics, trans. Wehrle, Albert J. (Cambridge, MA, 1985).Google Scholar

Medvedev, Pavel, Forma'nyj metod: Kriticeskoe vvedenie v sociologiceskuju poetiku (Leningrad, 1928).Google Scholar

Medvedev, Pavel, Formalizm iformalisty (Leningrad, 1934).Google Scholar

Morson, Gary Saul and Emerson, Caryl, Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics (Stanford, 1990).Google Scholar

Mukařovský, Jan, ‘K pojmosloví československé teorie uměni’ [On the conceptural system of the Czechoslovak theory of art] (1947), Kapitoly, IGoogle Scholar

Polivanov, Evgeni, ‘Po povodu “zvukovych zestov” japonskogo jazyka’, Sborniki po teorii poeticeskogo jazyka (Petersburg, 1916), I.Google Scholar

Propp, Vladimir, Morfologija skazki (Leningrad, 1928).Google Scholar

Propp, Vladimir, Morphologie des Marchens, trans. Wendt, Ch. (Munich, 1972).Google Scholar

Propp, Vladimir, Morphologie du conte, trans. Derrida, M. et al. (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar

Propp, Vladimir, The Morphology of the Folktale, trans. Scott, L. (Austin, 1968).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, ‘Evgeni Onegin: Puskin i Sterr’, in Ocerki po poetike Puskina (Berlin, 1923).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, ‘Zaumnyj jazyk i poezija’, Sborniki po teorii po`tičeskogo jazyka. I (Petersburg, 1916).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Gamburgskij scet (Moscow, 1928).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, O teorii prozy (Moscow, 1925; 2nd enlarged edn, Moscow, 1929).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Schriften zum Film, trans. Kämpfe, A. (Frankfurt, 1966).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Sur la théorie de la prose, trans. Verret, G. (Lausanne, 1973).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Technika pisatel'skogo remesla (Moscow-Leningrad, 1927).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Theorie der Prosa, trans. Drohla, G. (Frankfurt, 1966).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Theory of Prose, trans. Sher, B. (Elmwood Park, IL, 1990).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Tret'ja fabrika (Moscow, 1926).Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Voskresenie slova (Petersburg, 1914).Google Scholar

Shpet, Gustav, Esteticeskie fragmenty, vols. 1–3 (Petersburg, 1922–3).Google Scholar

Shukman, Ann, Formalism: History, Comparison, Genre (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar

Shukman, Ann, and O'Toole, L. M. (eds.), Formalist Theory (Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar

Smith, Barry, and Mulligan, Kevin, ‘Pieces of a theory’, in Smith, (ed.), Parts

Steiner, Peter, Russian Formalism: A Metapoetics (Ithaca, NY, 1984).Google Scholar

Stempel, W. -D., and Striedter, Jurij (eds.), Texte der rusischen Formalisten, vols. 1 and 2 (Munich, 1969 and 1972).Google Scholar

Striedter, Jurij, ‘Einleitung’ to Vodička, Felix, Die Struktur der literarischen Entwick-lung, ed. Boldt, Frank et al. (Munich, 1976).Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan (ed.), Theorie de la litterature (Paris, 1965).Google Scholar

Tomashevsky, Boris, ‘Literatura i biografija’, Kniga i revoljucija, 4 (1923).Google Scholar

Tomashevsky, Boris, O stiche: Stat'i (Leningrad, 1929).Google Scholar

Tomashevsky, Boris, Russkoe stichoslozenie:Metrika (Petersburg, 1923).Google Scholar

Tomashevsky, Boris, Teorija literatury:Poetika (Moscow-Leningrad, 1925).Google Scholar

Tynyanov, Juri and Jakobson, Roman, ‘Problemy izucenija literatury i jazyka’, Novyj Lef 12 (1928).Google Scholar

Tynyanov, Juri, ‘Ob osnovach kino’, in Poetika kino (Moscow-Leningrad, 1927).Google Scholar

Tynyanov, Juri, Archaisty i novatory (Leningrad, 1929).Google Scholar

Tynyanov, Juri, Das Problem der Verssprache: Zur Semantik des poetischen Textes, trans. Paulmann, I. (Munich, 1977).Google Scholar

Tynyanov, Juri, Die literarischen Kunstmittel und die Evolution der Literatur, trans. Kaämpfe, A. (Frankfurt, 1967).Google Scholar

Tynyanov, Juri, Problema stichotvornogo jazyka (Leningrad, 1924).Google Scholar

Tynyanov, Juri, The Problem of Verse Language, trans. Sosa, M. and Harvey, B. (Ann Arbor, MI, 1981).Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Viktor, Etjudy O stile Gogolja (Leningrad, 1926).Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Viktor, Evoljucija russkogo naturalizma: Gogo'-Dostoevskij (Leningrad, 1929).Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Viktor, Gogol’ i natural'naja skola (Leningrad, 1925).Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Viktor, O poezii Anny Achmatovoj: Stilisticeskie nabroski (Leningrad, 1925).Google Scholar

Vinokur, Grigori, ‘Poetika, lingvistika, sociologija: Metodologiceskaja spravka’, Lef 3 (1923).Google Scholar

Vinokur, Grigori, Biografija i kul'tura (Moscow, 1927).Google Scholar

Vinokur, Grigori, Kul'tura jazyka (Moscow, 1925).Google Scholar

Voloshinov, V. N. (attributed to Bakhtin, M.), Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. Matejka, Ladislaw and Titunik, I. R. (Cambridge, MA, 1986).Google Scholar

Voloshinov, V. N.Freudianism: A Critical Sketch, trans. Titunik, I. R. (Bloomington, IN, 1987).Google Scholar

Wellek, René, A History of Modern Criticism 1750–1950, vol 7 (New Haven, 1991).Google Scholar

Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Bajron i Puskin: Iz istorii romanticeskoj poemy (Leningrad, 1924).Google Scholar

Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Kompozicija liriceskich stichotvorenij (Petersburg, 1921).Google Scholar

Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Rifma, ee istorija i teorija (Petersburg, 1923).Google Scholar

Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Voprosy literatury: Stat'i 1916–1926 (Leningrad, 1928).Google Scholar

Zhirmunsky, Viktor, Vvedenie v metriku: Teorija sticha (Leningrad, 1925).Google Scholar

Zirmunsky, Viktor, Introduction to Metrics, trans. Brown, C. F. (The Hague, 1966).CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

1 - Russian Formalism

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive